Nonbenzodiazepine

The nonbenzodiazepines, also called benzodiazepine-like drugs, are a class of psychoactive drugs pharmacologically resembling the benzodiazepines, with similar benefits, side effects and risks, despite having dissimilar or entirely different chemical structures.^[1][2]

Classes

Core structures of selected nonbenzodiazepines (left three diagrams) and the structure of benzodiazepine (right) for comparison.

There are currently three major chemical classes of nonbenzodiazepines:

• Imidazopyridines
  • Zolpidem (Ambien)
  • Alpidem
  • Necopidem
  • Saripidem
• Pyrazolopyrimidines
  • Zaleplon (Sonata)
  • Divaplon
  • Fasiplon
  • Indiplon
  • Lorediplon
  • Ocinaplon
  • Panadiplon
  • Taniplon
• Cyclopyrrolones
  • Eszopiclone (Lunesta)
  • Zopiclone (Imovane)
  • Pagoclone
  • Pazinaclone
  • Suproclone
  • Suriclone
• β-Carbolines
  • Abecarnil
  • Gedocarnil
  • ZK-93423
• Others
  • CGS-9896
  • CGS-20625
  • CL-218,872
  • ELB-139
  • GBLD-345
  • L-838,417
  • NS-2664
  • NS-2710
  • Pipequaline
  • RWJ-51204
  • SB-205,384
  • SL-651,498
  • SX-3228
  • TP-003
  • TP-13
  • TPA-023
  • Y-23684

Pharmacology

The nonbenzodiazepines are positive allosteric modulators of the GABA-A receptor. Like the benzodiazepines, they exert their effects by binding to and activating the benzodiazepine site of the receptor complex.

Background

Nonbenzodiazepines have demonstrated efficacy in treating sleep disorders. There is some limited evidence that suggests that tolerance to nonbenzodiazepines is slower to develop than with benzodiazepines. However, data is limited so no conclusions can be drawn. Data is also limited into the long term effects of nonbenzodiazepines. Further research into the safety of nonbenzodiazepines and long term effectiveness of nonbenzodiazepines has been recommended in a review of the literature.^[3] Some differences exist between the Z-drugs, for example tolerance and rebound effects may not occur with zaleplon.^[4]

Pharmaceuticals

The first three nonbenzodiazepine drugs to enter the market were the "Z-drugs", zopiclone, zolpidem and zaleplon. These three drugs are all sedatives used exclusively for the treatment of mild insomnia. They are safer than the older barbiturates especially in overdosage and they may, when compared to the benzodiazepines, have less of a tendency to induce physical dependence and addiction, although these issues can still become a problem. This has led to the Z-drugs becoming widely prescribed for the treatment of insomnia particularly in elderly patients.^[5][6][7] Long term use is not recommended as tolerance and addiction can occur.^[8] A survey of patients using nonbenzodiazepine Z drugs and benzodiazepine hypnotic users found that there was no difference in reports of adverse effects which were reported in over 41% of users and, in fact, Z drug users were more likely to report that they had tried to quit their hypnotic drug and were more likely to want to stop taking Z drugs than benzodiazepine users. Efficacy also didn't differ between Z drugs and benzodiazepine users.^[9]

Side effects

The Z-drugs are not without disadvantages, and all three compounds are notable for producing side effects such as pronounced amnesia and more rarely hallucinations,^[10][11] especially when used in large doses. More rarely these drugs can produce a fugue state where the patient sleepwalks and may perform relatively complex actions, including cooking meals or driving cars, while effectively unconscious and with no recollection of the events upon awakening. While this effect is rare (and has also been reported to occur with some of the older sedative drugs such as temazepam and secobarbital) it can be potentially hazardous and so further development of this class of drugs has continued in an effort to find new compounds with further improved profiles.^{[12][13][14][15][16]}

Side effects can differ within the drug class due to differences in metabolism and pharmacology. For example long acting benzodiazepines have problems of drug accumulation especially in the elderly or those with liver disease and shorter acting benzodiazepines have a higher risk of more severe withdrawal symptoms.^[17][18] In the case of the nonbenzodiazepines, zaleplon may be the safest in terms of next day sedation and unlike zolpidem and zopiclone, zaleplon has been found to have no association with increased motor vehicle accidents even when taken for middle of the night insomnia due to its ultra short elimination half life.^{[19][20][21][22]}

Increased risk of depression

It has been claimed that insomnia causes depression and hypothesized that insomnia medications may help to treat depression. However, an analysis of data of clinical trials submitted to the FDA concerning the drugs zolpidem, zaleplon and eszopiclone found that these sedative hypnotic drugs more than doubled the risks of developing depression compared to those taking placebo pills. Hypnotic drugs therefore may be contraindicated in patients suffering from or at risk of depression. Hypnotics were found to be more likely to cause depression than to help it. Studies have found that long term users of sedative hypnotic drugs have a markedly raised suicide risk as well as an overall increased mortality risk. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for insomnia on the other hand has been found to both improve sleep quality as well as general mental health.^[23]

Dependence and withdrawal management

Nonbenzodiazepines should not be discontinued abruptly if taken for more than a few weeks due to the risk of rebound withdrawal effects and acute withdrawal reactions which may resemble those seen during benzodiazepine withdrawal. Treatment usually entails gradually reducing the dosage over a period of weeks or several months depending on the individual, dosage and length of time the drug has been taken. If this approach fails a cross over to a benzodiazepine equivalent dose of a long acting benzodiazepine such as chlordiazepoxide or preferably diazepam can be tried followed by a gradual reduction in dosage. In extreme cases and particularly where severe addiction and or abuse is manifested an inpatient detoxification may be required with flumazenil as a possible detoxification tool.^[24][25][26]

Carcinogenicity

The Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine published a paper which had carried out a systematic review of the medical literature concerning insomnia medications and raised concerns about benzodiazepine receptor agonist drugs, the benzodiazepines and the Z-drugs that are used as hypnotics in humans. The review found that almost all trials of sleep disorders and drugs are sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. It was found that the odds ratio for finding results favorable to industry in industry-sponsored trials was 3.6 times higher than non-industry-sponsored studies and that 24% of authors did not disclose being funded by the drug companies in their published papers when they were funded by the drug companies. The paper found that there is little research into hypnotics that is independent from the drug manufacturers. Also of concern was the lack of focus in industry sponsored trials on their own results showing that use of hypnotics is correlated with depression.

The author was concerned that there is no discussion of adverse effects of benzodiazepine agonist hypnotics discussed in the medical literature such as significant increased levels of infection, cancers and increased mortality in trials of hypnotic drugs and an overemphasis on the positive effects. No hypnotic manufacturer has yet tried to refute the epidemiology data that shows that use of their product is correlated with excess mortality. The author stated that "major hypnotic trials is needed to more carefully study potential adverse effects of hypnotics such as daytime impairment, infection, cancer, and death and the resultant balance of benefits and risks." The author concluded that more independent research into daytime impairment, infection, cancer, and shortening of lives of sedative hypnotic users is needed to find the true balance of benefits and risks of benzodiazepine agonist hypnotic drugs in the treatment of insomnia.^[27] Significant increases in skin cancers and tumors are found in clinical trial data of the nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics compared to trial subjects who took placebo tablets. Other cancers of the brain, lung, bowel, breast and bladder also occurred. An increase of infections, possibly due to decreased immune function also occurred in the nonbenzodiazepine users. It has been hypothesised that either depressed immune function or the viral infections themselves were the cause of the increased rates of cancer.

Initially the FDA was hesitant to approve some of the nonbenzodiazepines due to concerns regarding increases in cancers. The author reported that due to the fact that the FDA requires reporting of both favourable and unfavourable results of clinical trials that the FDA NDA data is more reliable than the peer reviewed literature which is subject to serious bias regarding hypnotics. In 2008 the FDA analysed their data again and confirmed an increased rate of cancers in the randomised trials compared to placebos but concluded that the rate of cancers did not warrant any regulatory action.^[28]

Elderly

Nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic drugs, similar to benzodiazepines causes impairments in body balance and standing steadiness in individuals who wake up during the night or the next morning; falls and hip fractures are frequently reported. The combination with alcohol increases these impairments. Partial, but incomplete tolerance develops to these impairments.^[29] Nonbenzodiazepines are not generally recommended for older patients due to the increased risk of falls and fractures.^[30] An extensive review of the medical literature regarding the management of insomnia and the elderly found that there is considerable evidence of the effectiveness and lasting benefits of non-drug treatments for insomnia in adults of all age groups and that these interventions are under used. Compared with the benzodiazepines, the nonbenzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics offer little if any advantages in efficacy or tolerability in elderly persons. It was found that newer agents such as the melatonin agonists may be more suitable and effective for the management of chronic insomnia in elderly people. Long-term use of sedative-hypnotics for insomnia lacks an evidence base and is discouraged for reasons that include concerns about such potential adverse drug effects as cognitive impairment (anterograde amnesia), daytime sedation, motor incoordination, and increased risk of motor vehicle accidents and falls. In addition, the effectiveness and safety of long-term use of these agents remain to be determined. It was concluded that further research is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of treatment and the most appropriate management strategy for elderly persons with chronic insomnia.^[31]

Controversy

A review of the literature regarding hypnotics including the nonbenzodiazepine Z drugs concluded that these drugs caused an unjustifiable risk to the individual and to public health and lack evidence of long term effectiveness due to tolerance. The risks include dependence, accidents and other adverse effects. Gradual discontinuation of hypnotics leads to improved health without worsening of sleep. Preferably they should be prescribed for only a few days at the lowest effective dose and avoided altogether wherever possible in the elderly.^[32]

New compounds

More recently, a range of non-sedating anxiolytic drugs derived from the same structural families as the Z-drugs have been developed, such as alpidem and pagoclone and are starting to be marketed. These drugs are also much more selective than the older benzodiazepine anxiolytics, producing effective relief of anxiety symptoms but with little or no sedative or amnestic side effects, and so offer considerable advantages over the older anxiolytic drugs; however, they are still new to the market and have not yet been widely prescribed.

See also

• Benzodiazepine
• Z-drugs

• Zaleplon (Sonata)
• Zolpidem (Ambien)
• Zopiclone (Imovane)
• Eszopiclone (Lunesta)

References

1. ^ Siriwardena AN, Qureshi Z, Gibson S, Collier S, Latham M (2006). "GPs' attitudes to benzodiazepine and 'Z-drug' prescribing: a barrier to implementation of evidence and guidance on hypnotics". Br J Gen Pract 56 (533): 964–67. PMC 1934058. PMID 17132386. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1934058. 
2. ^ Wagner, J.; Wagner, ML.; Hening, WA. (June 1998). "Beyond benzodiazepines: alternative pharmacologic agents for the treatment of insomnia". Ann Pharmacother 32 (6): 680–91. doi:10.1345/aph.17111. PMID 9640488. 
3. ^ Benca RM (March 2005). "Diagnosis and treatment of chronic insomnia: a review". Psychiatr Serv 56 (3): 332–43. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.56.3.332. PMID 15746509. http://ps.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/56/3/332. 
4. ^ Lader MH (January 2001). "Implications of hypnotic flexibility on patterns of clinical use". Int J Clin Pract Suppl (116): 14–9. PMID 11219327. 
5. ^ Neubauer DN (2006). "New approaches in managing chronic insomnia". CNS Spectrums 11 (8 Suppl 8): 1–13. PMID 16871130. 
6. ^ Najib J (2006). "Eszopiclone, a nonbenzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic agent for the treatment of transient and chronic insomnia". Clinical Therapeutics 28 (4): 491–516. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.04.014. PMID 16750462. 
7. ^ Lieberman JA (2007). "Update on the Safety Considerations in the Management of Insomnia With Hypnotics: Incorporating Modified-Release Formulations Into Primary Care" (PDF). Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 9 (1): 25–31. PMC 1894851. PMID 17599165. http://www.psychiatrist.com/pcc/pccpdf/v09n01/v09n0105.pdf. 
8. ^ Touitou Y (July 2007). "[Sleep disorders and hypnotic agents: medical, social and economical impact]" (in French). Ann Pharm Fr 65 (4): 230–8. PMID 17652991. 
9. ^ Siriwardena AN, Qureshi MZ, Dyas JV, Middleton H, Orner R (June 2008). "Magic bullets for insomnia? Patients' use and experiences of newer (Z drugs) versus older (benzodiazepine) hypnotics for sleep problems in primary care". Br J Gen Pract 58 (551): 417–22. doi:10.3399/bjgp08X299290. PMC 2418994. PMID 18505619. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2418994. 
10. ^ Stone JR, Zorick TS, Tsuang J (2007). "Dose-related illusions and hallucinations with zaleplon". Clin Toxicol (Philadelphia) 46 (4): 1–2. doi:10.1080/15563650701517442. PMID 17852167. 
11. ^ Toner LC, Tsambiras BM, Catalano G, Catalano MC, Cooper DS (2000). "Central nervous system side effects associated with zolpidem treatment". Clin Neuropharmacol 23 (1): 54–8. doi:10.1097/00002826-200001000-00011. PMID 10682233. 
12. ^ Mellingsaeter TC, Bramness JG, Slørdal L (2006). "[Are z-hypnotics better and safer sleeping pills than benzodiazepines?"] (in Norwegian). Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 126 (22): 2954–6. PMID 17117195. http://www.tidsskriftet.no/pls/lts/pa_lt.visSeksjon?vp_SEKS_ID=1453732. 
13. ^ Yang W, Dollear M, Muthukrishnan SR (2005). "One rare side effect of zolpidem--sleepwalking: a case report". Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86 (6): 1265–6. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.022. PMID 15954071. 
14. ^ Lange CL (2005). "Medication-associated somnambulism". Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 44 (3): 211–2. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000150618.67559.48. PMID 15725964. 
15. ^ Morgenthaler TI, Silber MH (2002). "Amnestic sleep-related eating disorder associated with zolpidem". Sleep Medicine 3 (4): 323–7. doi:10.1016/S1389-9457(02)00007-2. PMID 14592194. 
16. ^ Liskow B, Pikalov A (2004). "Zaleplon overdose associated with sleepwalking and complex behavior". Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 43 (8): 927–8. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000129219.66563.aa. PMID 15266187. 
17. ^ Shader RI, Greenblatt DJ (June 1977). "Clinical implications of benzodiazepine pharmacokinetics". Am J Psychiatry 134 (6): 652–6. PMID 17302. http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17302. 
18. ^ Noyes R, Perry PJ, Crowe RR, et al. (January 1986). "Seizures following the withdrawal of alprazolam". J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 174 (1): 50–2. doi:10.1097/00005053-198601000-00009. PMID 2867122. 
19. ^ Menzin J, Lang KM, Levy P, Levy E (January 2001). "A general model of the effects of sleep medications on the risk and cost of motor vehicle accidents and its application to France". Pharmacoeconomics 19 (1): 69–78. doi:10.2165/00019053-200119010-00005. PMID 11252547. 
20. ^ Vermeeren A, Riedel WJ, van Boxtel MP, Darwish M, Paty I, Patat A (March 2002). "Differential residual effects of zaleplon and zopiclone on actual driving: a comparison with a low dose of alcohol". Sleep 25 (2): 224–31. PMID 11905433. 
21. ^ Walsh JK; Pollak CP, Scharf MB, Schweitzer PK, Vogel GW (Jan-February 2000). "Lack of residual sedation following middle-of-the-night zaleplon administration in sleep maintenance insomnia". Clin Neuropharmacol 23 (1): 17–21. doi:10.1097/00002826-200001000-00004. PMID 10682226. 
22. ^ Verster JC, Veldhuijzen DS, Volkerts ER (August 2004). "Residual effects of sleep medication on driving ability". Sleep Med Rev 8 (4): 309–25. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2004.02.001. PMID 15233958. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1087079204000073. 
23. ^ Kripke DF (August 21, 2007). "Greater incidence of depression with hypnotic use than with placebo". BMC Psychiatry (pubmed) 7: 42. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-7-42. PMC 1994947. PMID 17711589. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1994947. 
24. ^ MedlinePlus (January 8, 2001). "Eszopiclone". National Institutes of Health. Archived from the original on February 27, 2008. http://web.archive.org/web/20080227024716/http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/medmaster/a605009.html. Retrieved 21 March 2008. 
25. ^ Professor Heather Ashton. "BENZODIAZEPINES: HOW THEY WORK AND HOW TO WITHDRAW". http://www.benzo.org.uk/manual/. 
26. ^ Quaglio G, Lugoboni F, Fornasiero A, Lechi A, Gerra G, Mezzelani P (September 2005). "Dependence on zolpidem: two case reports of detoxification with flumazenil infusion". Int Clin Psychopharmacol 20 (5): 285–7. doi:10.1097/01.yic.0000166404.41850.b4. PMID 16096519. 
27. ^ Kripke DF (December 15, 2007). "Who Should Sponsor Sleep Disorders Pharmaceutical Trials?". J Clin Sleep Med 3 (7): 671–3. PMC 2556906. PMID 18198797. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2556906. "major hypnotic trials is needed to more carefully study potential adverse effects of hypnotics such as daytime impairment, infection, cancer, and death and the resultant balance of benefits and risks." 
28. ^ Kripke DF (September 2008). "Possibility that certain hypnotics might cause cancer in skin". J Sleep Res 17 (3): 245–50. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00685.x. PMID 18844818. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/resolve/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pubmed&issn=0962-1105&date=2008&volume=17&issue=3&spage=245. 
29. ^ Mets, MA.; Volkerts, ER.; Olivier, B.; Verster, JC. (Feb 2010). "Effect of hypnotic drugs on body balance and standing steadiness". Sleep Med Rev 14 (4): 259–67. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2009.10.008. PMID 20171127. 
30. ^ Antai-Otong D (August 2006). "The art of prescribing. Risks and benefits of non-benzodiazepine receptor agonists in the treatment of acute primary insomnia in older adults". Perspect Psychiatr Care 42 (3): 196–200. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6163.2006.00070.x. PMID 16916422. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118727940/abstract. 
31. ^ Bain KT (June 2006). "Management of chronic insomnia in elderly persons". Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 4 (2): 168–92. doi:10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.06.006. PMID 16860264. 
32. ^ "What's wrong with prescribing hypnotics?". Drug Ther Bull 42 (12): 89–93. December 2004. doi:10.1136/dtb.2004.421289. PMID 15587763. http://www.nelm.nhs.uk/en/NeLM-Area/Evidence/Drug-Class-Focused-Reviews/498264/. ^{[dead link]}

External links

• http://pharmacy.oregonstate.edu/drug_policy/pages/dur_board/reviews/articles/nonbenzodiazepine.html