# Maxwell's equations

Maxwell's equations

Maxwell's equations are a set of partial differential equations that, together with the Lorentz force law, form the foundation of classical electrodynamics, classical optics, and electric circuits. These fields in turn underlie modern electrical and communications technologies.

Maxwell's equations have two major variants. The "microscopic" set of Maxwell's equations uses total charge and total current including the difficult-to-calculate atomic level charges and currents in materials. The "macroscopic" set of Maxwell's equations defines two new auxiliary fields that can sidestep having to know these 'atomic' sized charges and currents.

Maxwell's equations are named after the Scottish physicist and mathematician James Clerk Maxwell, since in an early form they are all found in a four-part paper, "On Physical Lines of Force," which he published between 1861 and 1862. The mathematical form of the Lorentz force law also appeared in this paper.

It is often useful to write Maxwell's equations in other forms; these representations are still formally termed "Maxwell's equations". A relativistic formulation in terms of covariant field tensors is used in special relativity, while, in quantum mechanics, a version based on the electric and magnetic potentials is preferred.

## Conceptual description

Conceptually, Maxwell's equations describe how electric charges and electric currents act as sources for the electric and magnetic fields. Further, it describes how a time varying electric field generates a time varying magnetic field and vice versa. (See below for a mathematical description of these laws.) Of the four equations, two of them, Gauss's law and Gauss's law for magnetism, describe how the fields emanate from charges. (For the magnetic field there is no magnetic charge and therefore magnetic fields lines neither begin nor end anywhere.) The other two equations describe how the fields 'circulate' around their respective sources; the magnetic field 'circulates' around electric currents and time varying electric field in Ampère's law with Maxwell's correction, while the electric field 'circulates' around time varying magnetic fields in Faraday's law.

### Gauss's law

Gauss's law describes the relationship between an electric field and the electric charges that cause it: The electric field points away from positive charges and towards negative charges. In the field line description, electric field lines begin only at positive electric charges and end only at negative electric charges. 'Counting' the number of field lines in a closed surface, therefore, yields the total charge enclosed by that surface. More technically, it relates the electric flux through any hypothetical closed "Gaussian surface" to the enclosed electric charge.

Gauss's law for magnetism: magnetic field lines never begin nor end but form loops or extend to infinity as shown here with the magnetic field due to a ring of current.

### Gauss's law for magnetism

Gauss's law for magnetism states that there are no "magnetic charges" (also called magnetic monopoles), analogous to electric charges.[1] Instead, the magnetic field due to materials is generated by a configuration called a dipole. Magnetic dipoles are best represented as loops of current but resemble positive and negative 'magnetic charges', inseparably bound together, having no net 'magnetic charge'. In terms of field lines, this equation states that magnetic field lines neither begin nor end but make loops or extend to infinity and back. In other words, any magnetic field line that enters a given volume must somewhere exit that volume. Equivalent technical statements are that the sum total magnetic flux through any Gaussian surface is zero, or that the magnetic field is a solenoidal vector field.

In a geomagnetic storm, a surge in the flux of charged particles temporarily alters Earth's magnetic field, which induces electric fields in Earth's atmosphere, thus causing surges in our electrical power grids.

Faraday's law describes how a time varying magnetic field creates ("induces") an electric field.[1] This aspect of electromagnetic induction is the operating principle behind many electric generators: for example a rotating bar magnet creates a changing magnetic field, which in turn generates an electric field in a nearby wire. (Note: there are two closely related equations which are called Faraday's law. The form used in Maxwell's equations is always valid but more restrictive than that originally formulated by Michael Faraday.)

### Ampère's law with Maxwell's correction

An Wang's magnetic core memory (1954) is an application of Ampère's law. Each core stores one bit of data.

Ampère's law with Maxwell's correction states that magnetic fields can be generated in two ways: by electrical current (this was the original "Ampère's law") and by changing electric fields (this was "Maxwell's correction").

Maxwell's correction to Ampère's law is particularly important: it shows that not only a changing magnetic field induces an electric field, but also a changing electric field induces a magnetic field.[1][2] Therefore, these equations allow self-sustaining "electromagnetic waves" to travel through empty space (see electromagnetic wave equation).

The speed calculated for electromagnetic waves, which could be predicted from experiments on charges and currents,[note 1] exactly matches the speed of light; indeed, light is one form of electromagnetic radiation (as are X-rays, radio waves, and others). Maxwell understood the connection between electromagnetic waves and light in 1861, thereby unifying the theories of electromagnetism and optics.

## Units and summary of equations

Maxwell's equations vary with the unit system used. Though the general form remains the same, various definitions get changed and different constants appear at different places. (This may seem strange at first, but this is because some unit systems, e.g. variants of cgs, define their units in such a way that certain physical constants are fixed, dimensionless constants, e.g. 1, so these constants disappear from the equations.) The equations in this section are given in SI units. Other units commonly used are Gaussian units (based on the cgs system[3]), Lorentz–Heaviside units (used mainly in particle physics) and Planck units (used in theoretical physics). See below for CGS-Gaussian units.

For a description of the difference between the microscopic and macroscopic variants of Maxwell's equations see the relevant sections below.

In the equations given below, symbols in bold represent vector quantities, and symbols in italics represent scalar quantities. The definitions of terms used in the two tables of equations are given in another table immediately following.

### Table of 'microscopic' equations

Formulation in terms of total charge and current[note 2]
Name Differential form Integral form
Gauss's law $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac {\rho} {\varepsilon_0}$ $\int\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\!\;\!\subset\;\!\;\!\!\;\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\int_{\partial V}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\;\!\!\supset \mathbf E\;\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf A = \frac{Q(V)}{\varepsilon_0}$
Gauss's law for magnetism $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0$ $\int\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\!\;\!\subset\;\!\;\!\!\;\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\int_{\partial V}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\;\!\!\supset \mathbf B\;\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf A = 0$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}} {\partial t}$ $\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l} = - \frac {\partial \Phi_S{(\mathbf B)}}{\partial t}$
Ampère's circuital law
(with Maxwell's correction)
$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0\mathbf{J} + \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}} {\partial t}\$ $\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 I_S + \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac {\partial \Phi_S{(\mathbf E)}}{\partial t}$

Here, in agreement with the common definition, it is assumed that one works in a system where the integration regions are constant. Thus, for example, $\frac{\partial\Phi_S{(\mathbf B)}}{\partial t}:=\iint_S\frac{\partial{ (\mathbf B)}}{\partial t}\cdot\rm d\mathbf S\,.$ However, exactly this equation, and not  $\frac{\partial\Phi_S{(\mathbf B)}}{\partial t} :=\frac{\rm d}{\rm dt}\iint_{S(t)}\mathbf B(t)\cdot\rm d\mathbf S\,,$ would also be true, if S were to depend on time as well.

### Table of 'macroscopic' equations

Formulation in terms of free charge and current
Name Differential form Integral form
Gauss's law $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = \rho_f$ $\iint_{\partial V}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\subset\!\supset \mathbf D\;\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf A = Q_{f}(V)$
Gauss's law for magnetism $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0$ $\iint_{\partial V}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\subset\!\supset \mathbf B\;\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf A = 0$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}} {\partial t}$ $\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l} = - \frac {\partial \Phi_S(\mathbf B)}{\partial t}$
Ampère's circuital law
(with Maxwell's correction)
$\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{J}_f + \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}} {\partial t}$ $\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{H} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l} = I_{f,S} + \frac {\partial \Phi_S(\mathbf D)}{\partial t}$

### Table of terms used in Maxwell's equations

The following table provides the meaning of each symbol and the SI unit of measure:

Definitions and units
Symbol Meaning (first term is the most common) SI Unit of Measure
$\mathbf{E} \$ electric field
also called the electric field intensity
volt per meter or, equivalently,
newton per coulomb
$\mathbf{B} \$ magnetic field
also called the magnetic induction
also called the magnetic field density
also called the magnetic flux density
tesla, or equivalently,
weber per square meter,
volt-second per square meter
$\mathbf{D} \$ electric displacement field
also called the electric induction
also called the electric flux density
coulombs per square meter or equivalently,
newton per volt-meter
$\mathbf{H} \$ magnetizing field
also called auxiliary magnetic field
also called magnetic field intensity
also called magnetic field
ampere per meter
$\mathbf{\nabla \cdot}$ the divergence operator per meter (factor contributed by applying either operator)
$\mathbf{\nabla \times}$ the curl operator
$\frac {\partial}{\partial t}$ partial derivative with respect to time per second (factor contributed by applying the operator)
$S \$ and $\partial S$ $S \$ is any surface, and $\partial S$ is its boundary curve. The surface is fixed (unchanging in time).
$V \$ and $\partial V$ $V \$ is any three-dimensional volume, and $\partial V$ is its boundary surface. The volume is fixed (unchanging in time).
$\mathrm{d}\mathbf{A}$ differential vector element of surface area A, with infinitesimally small magnitude and direction normal to surface S square meters
$\mathrm{d} \mathbf{l}$ differential vector element of path length tangential to the path/curve meters
$\varepsilon_0 \$ permittivity of free space, also called the electric constant, a universal constant farads per meter
$\mu_0 \$ permeability of free space, also called the magnetic constant, a universal constant henries per meter, or newtons per ampere squared
$\ \rho_f \$ free charge density (not including bound charge) coulombs per cubic meter
$\ \rho \$ total charge density (including both free and bound charge) coulombs per cubic meter
$\mathbf{J}_f$ free current density (not including bound current) amperes per square meter
$\mathbf{J}$ total current density (including both free and bound current) amperes per square meter
$\,Q_f (V)$ net free electric charge within the three-dimensional volume V (not including bound charge) coulombs
$\,Q(V)$ net electric charge within the three-dimensional volume V (including both free and bound charge) coulombs
$\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l}$ line integral of the electric field along the boundary ∂S of a surface S (∂S is always a closed curve). joules per coulomb
$\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l}$ line integral of the magnetic field over the closed boundary ∂S of the surface S tesla-meters
$\iint_{\partial V}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\subset\!\supset \mathbf E\;\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf A$ the electric flux (surface integral of the electric field) through the (closed) surface $\partial V$ (the boundary of the volume V) joule-meter per coulomb
$\iint_{\partial V}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\subset\!\supset \mathbf B\;\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf A$ the magnetic flux (surface integral of the magnetic B-field) through the (closed) surface $\partial V$ (the boundary of the volume V) tesla meters-squared or webers
$\iint_S \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathrm{d} \mathbf{A} = \Phi_S{(\mathbf B)}$ magnetic flux through any surface S, not necessarily closed webers or equivalently, volt-seconds
$\iint_S \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d} \mathbf{A} = \Phi_S{(\mathbf E)}$ electric flux through any surface S, not necessarily closed joule-meters per coulomb
$\iint_S \mathbf{D} \cdot \mathrm{d} \mathbf{A} = \Phi_S{(\mathbf D)}$ flux of electric displacement field through any surface S, not necessarily closed coulombs
$\iint_S \mathbf{J}_f \cdot \mathrm{d} \mathbf{A} = I_{f,s}$ net free electrical current passing through the surface S (not including bound current) amperes
$\iint_S \mathbf{J} \cdot \mathrm{d} \mathbf{A} = I_{S}$ net electrical current passing through the surface S (including both free and bound current) amperes

### Proof that the two general formulations are equivalent

The two alternate general formulations of Maxwell's equations given above are mathematically equivalent and related by the following relations:

$\rho_b = -\nabla\cdot\mathbf{P},$
$\mathbf{J}_b = \nabla\times\mathbf{M} + \frac{\partial\mathbf{P}}{\partial t},$
$\mathbf{D} = \varepsilon_0\mathbf{E} + \mathbf{P},$
$\mathbf{B} = \mu_0(\mathbf{H} + \mathbf{M}),$
$\rho = \rho_b + \rho_f, \$
$\mathbf{J} = \mathbf{J}_b + \mathbf{J}_f,$

where P and M are polarization and magnetization, and ρb and Jb are bound charge and current, respectively. Substituting these equations into the 'macroscopic' Maxwell's equations gives identically the microscopic equations.

### Relationship between differential and integral forms

The differential and integral forms of the equations are mathematically equivalent, by the divergence theorem in the case of Gauss's law and Gauss's law for magnetism, and by the Kelvin–Stokes theorem in the case of Faraday's law and Ampère's law. Both the differential and integral forms are useful. The integral forms can often be used to simply and directly calculate fields from symmetric distributions of charges and currents. On the other hand, the differential forms are a more natural starting point for calculating the fields in more complicated (less symmetric) situations, for example using finite element analysis.[5]

## Maxwell's 'microscopic' equations

The microscopic variant of Maxwell's equation expresses the electric E field and the magnetic B field in terms of the total charge and total current present including the charges and currents at the atomic level. It is sometimes called the general form of Maxwell's equations or "Maxwell's equations in a vacuum". Both variants of Maxwell's equations are equally general, though, as they are mathematically equivalent. The microscopic equations are most useful in waveguides for example, when there are no dielectric or magnetic materials nearby.

Formulation in terms of total charge and current[note 3]
Name Differential form Integral form
Gauss's law $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac {\rho} {\varepsilon_0}$ $\iint_{\partial V}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\subset\!\supset \mathbf E\;\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf A = \frac{Q(V)}{\varepsilon_0}$
Gauss's law for magnetism $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0$ $\iint_{\partial V}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\subset\!\supset \mathbf B\;\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf A = 0$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}} {\partial t}$ $\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l} = - \frac {\partial \Phi_{S}(\mathbf B)}{\partial t}$
Ampère's circuital law
(with Maxwell's correction)
$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0\mathbf{J} + \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}} {\partial t}\$ $\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l} = \mu_0 I_S + \mu_0 \varepsilon_0 \frac {\partial \Phi_S{(\mathbf E)}}{\partial t}$

### With neither charges nor currents

In a region with no charges (ρ = 0) and no currents (J = 0), such as in a vacuum, Maxwell's equations reduce to:

$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 0$
$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = - \frac{\partial\mathbf{B}} {\partial t}$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \ \ \mu_0\varepsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}} {\partial t}.$

These equations lead directly to E and B satisfying the wave equation for which the solutions are linear combinations of plane waves traveling at the speed of light,

$c = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu_0 \varepsilon_0}}. \$

In addition, E and B are mutually perpendicular to each other and the direction of motion and are in phase with each other. A sinusoidal plane wave is one special solution of these equations.

In fact, Maxwell's equations explain how these waves can physically propagate through space. The changing magnetic field creates a changing electric field through Faraday's law. In turn, that electric field creates a changing magnetic field through Maxwell's correction to Ampère's law. This perpetual cycle allows these waves, now known as electromagnetic radiation, to move through space at velocity c.

## Maxwell's 'macroscopic' equations

Unlike the 'microscopic' equations, "Maxwell's macroscopic equations", also known as Maxwell's equations in matter, factor out the bound charge and current to obtain equations that depend only on the free charges and currents. These equations are more similar to those that Maxwell himself introduced. The cost of this factorization is that additional fields need to be defined: the displacement field D which is defined in terms of the electric field E and the polarization P of the material, and the magnetic-H field, which is defined in terms of the magnetic-B field and the magnetization M of the material.

### Bound charge and current

Left: A schematic view of how an assembly of microscopic dipoles produces opposite surface charges as shown at top and bottom. Right: How an assembly of microscopic current loops add together to produce a macroscopically circulating current loop. Inside the boundaries, the individual contributions tend to cancel, but at the boundaries no cancellation occurs.

When an electric field is applied to a dielectric material its molecules respond by forming microscopic electric dipoles—their atomic nuclei move a tiny distance in the direction of the field, while their electrons move a tiny distance in the opposite direction. This produces a macroscopic bound charge in the material even though all of the charges involved are bound to individual molecules. For example, if every molecule responds the same, similar to that shown in the figure, these tiny movements of charge combine to produce a layer of positive bound charge on one side of the material and a layer of negative charge on the other side. The bound charge is most conveniently described in terms of a polarization, P, in the material. If P is uniform, a macroscopic separation of charge is produced only at the surfaces where P enter and leave the material. For non-uniform P, a charge is also produced in the bulk.[6]

Somewhat similarly, in all materials the constituent atoms exhibit magnetic moments that are intrinsically linked to the angular momentum of the atoms' components, most notably their electrons. The connection to angular momentum suggests the picture of an assembly of microscopic current loops. Outside the material, an assembly of such microscopic current loops is not different from a macroscopic current circulating around the material's surface, despite the fact that no individual magnetic moment is traveling a large distance. These bound currents can be described using the magnetization M.[7]

The very complicated and granular bound charges and bound currents, therefore can be represented on the macroscopic scale in terms of P and M which average these charges and currents on a sufficiently large scale so as not to see the granularity of individual atoms, but also sufficiently small that they vary with location in the material. As such, the Maxwell's macroscopic equations ignores many details on a fine scale that may be unimportant to understanding matters on a grosser scale by calculating fields that are averaged over some suitably sized volume.

### Equations

Formulation in terms of free charge and current
Name Differential form Integral form
Gauss's law $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = \rho_f$ $\iint_{\partial V}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\subset\!\supset \mathbf D\;\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf A = Q_{f}(V)$
Gauss's law for magnetism $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0$ $\iint_{\partial V}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\;\;\;\subset\!\supset \mathbf B\;\cdot\mathrm{d}\mathbf A = 0$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}} {\partial t}$ $\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l} = - \frac {\partial \Phi_S{(\mathbf B)}}{\partial t}$
Ampère's circuital law
(with Maxwell's correction)
$\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{J}_f + \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}} {\partial t}$ $\oint_{\partial S} \mathbf{H} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{l} = I_{f,S} + \frac {\partial \Phi_S{(\mathbf D)}}{\partial t}$

### Constitutive relations

In order to apply 'Maxwell's macroscopic equations', it is necessary to specify the relations between displacement field D and E, and the magnetic H-field H and B. These equations specify the response of bound charge and current to the applied fields and are called constitutive relations.

Determining the constitutive relationship between the auxiliary fields D and H and the E and B fields starts with the definition of the auxiliary fields themselves:

$\mathbf{D}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \varepsilon_0 \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}, t) + \mathbf{P}(\mathbf{r}, t)$
$\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{1}{\mu_0} \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r}, t) - \mathbf{M}(\mathbf{r}, t),$

where P is the polarization field and M is the magnetization field which are defined in terms of microscopic bound charges and bound current respectively. Before getting to how to calculate M and P it is useful to examine some special cases, though.

#### Without magnetic or dielectric materials

In the absence of magnetic or dielectric materials, the constitutive relations are simple:

$\mathbf{D} = \varepsilon_0\mathbf{E}, \;\;\; \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{B}/\mu_0$

where ε0 and μ0 are two universal constants, called the permittivity of free space and permeability of free space, respectively. Substituting these back into Maxwell's macroscopic equations lead directly to Maxwell's microscopic equations, except that the currents and charges are replaced with free currents and free charges. This is expected since there are no bound charges nor currents.

#### Isotropic Linear materials

In an (isotropic[8]) linear material, where P is proportional to E and M is proportional to B the constitutive relations are also straightforward. In terms of the polarization P and the magnetization M they are:

$\mathbf{P} = \varepsilon_0\chi_e\mathbf{E}, \;\;\; \mathbf{M} = \chi_m\mathbf{H},$

where χe and χm are the electric and magnetic susceptibilities of a given material respectively. In terms of D and H the constitutive relations are:

$\mathbf{D} = \varepsilon\mathbf{E}, \;\;\; \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{B}/\mu,$

where ε and μ are constants (which depend on the material), called the permittivity and permeability, respectively, of the material. These are related to the susceptibilities by:

$\varepsilon = \varepsilon_0(1+\chi_e) \;\;\; \mu = \mu_0(1+\chi_m)$

Substituting in the constitutive relations above into Maxwell's equations in linear, dispersionless, time-invariant materials (differential form only) are:

$\nabla \cdot (\varepsilon \mathbf{E}) = \rho_f$
$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}} {\partial t}$
$\nabla \times (\mathbf{B} / \mu) = \mathbf{J}_f + \varepsilon \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}} {\partial t}.$

These are formally identical to the general formulation in terms of E and B (given above), except that the permittivity of free space was replaced with the permittivity of the material, the permeability of free space was replaced with the permeability of the material, and only free charges and currents are included (instead of all charges and currents). Unless that material is homogeneous in space, ε and μ cannot be factored out of the derivative expressions on the left sides.

#### General case

For real-world materials, the constitutive relations are not linear, except approximately. Calculating the constitutive relations from first principles involves determining how P and M are created from a given E and B.[note 4] These relations may be empirical (based directly upon measurements), or theoretical (based upon statistical mechanics, transport theory or other tools of condensed matter physics). The detail employed may be macroscopic or microscopic, depending upon the level necessary to the problem under scrutiny.

In general, though the constitutive relations can usually still be written:

$\mathbf{D} = \varepsilon\mathbf{E}, \;\;\; \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{B}/\mu$

but ε and μ are not, in general, simple constants, but rather functions. Examples are:

• Dispersion and absorption where ε and μ are functions of frequency. (Causality does not permit materials to be nondispersive; see, for example, Kramers–Kronig relations). Neither do the fields need to be in phase which leads to ε and μ being complex. This also leads to absorption.
• Bi-(an)isotropy where H and D depend on both B and E:[9]
$D=\varepsilon E+\xi H \;\;\; B= \mu H + \zeta E.$
$D_i = \sum_j \varepsilon_{ij} E_j \;\;\; B_i = \sum_j \mu_{ij} H_j.$
• Dependence of P and M on E and B at other locations and times. This could be due to spatial inhomogeneity; for example in a domained structure, heterostructure or a liquid crystal, or most commonly in the situation where there are simply multiple materials occupying different regions of space). Or it could be due to a time varying medium or due to hysteresis. In such cases P and M can be calculated as:[10][11]
$\mathbf{P}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \varepsilon_0 \int {\rm d}^3 \mathbf{r}'{\rm d}t'\; \hat{\chi}_{\mathrm{elec}} (\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{r}', t, t'; \mathbf{E})\, \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r}', t')$
$\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{1}{\mu_0} \int {\rm d}^3 \mathbf{r}'{\rm d}t' \; \hat{\chi}_{\mathrm{magn}} (\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{r}', t, t'; \mathbf{B})\, \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r}', t'),$
in which the permittivity and permeability functions are replaced by integrals over the more general electric and magnetic susceptibilities.[12]

In practice, some materials properties have a negligible impact in particular circumstances, permitting neglect of small effects. For example: optical nonlinearities can be neglected for low field strengths; material dispersion is unimportant when frequency is limited to a narrow bandwidth; material absorption can be neglected for wavelengths for which a material is transparent; and metals with finite conductivity often are approximated at microwave or longer wavelengths as perfect metals with infinite conductivity (forming hard barriers with zero skin depth of field penetration).

It may be noted that man-made materials can be designed to have customized permittivity and permeability, such as metamaterials and photonic crystals.

#### Calculation of constitutive relations

In general, the constitutive equations are theoretically determined by calculating how a molecule responds to the local fields through the Lorentz force. Other forces may need to be modeled as well such as lattice vibrations in crystals or bond forces. Including all of the forces leads to changes in the molecule which are used to calculate P and M as a function of the local fields.

The local fields differ from the applied fields due to the fields produced by the polarization and magnetization of nearby material; an effect which also needs to be modeled. Further, real materials are not continuous media; the local fields of real materials vary wildly on the atomic scale. The fields need to be averaged over a suitable volume to form a continuum approximation.

These continuum approximations often require some type of quantum mechanical analysis such as quantum field theory as applied to condensed matter physics. See, for example, density functional theory, Green–Kubo relations and Green's function. Various approximate transport equations have evolved, for example, the Boltzmann equation or the Fokker–Planck equation or the Navier–Stokes equations. Some examples where these equations are applied are magnetohydrodynamics, fluid dynamics, electrohydrodynamics, superconductivity, plasma modeling. An entire physical apparatus for dealing with these matters has developed. A different set of homogenization methods (evolving from a tradition in treating materials such as conglomerates and laminates) are based upon approximation of an inhomogeneous material by a homogeneous effective medium[13][14] (valid for excitations with wavelengths much larger than the scale of the inhomogeneity).[15][16][17][18]

The theoretical modeling of the continuum-approximation properties of many real materials often rely upon measurement as well,[19] for example, ellipsometry measurements.

## History

### Relation between electricity, magnetism, and the speed of light

The relation between electricity, magnetism, and the speed of light can be summarized by the modern equation:

$c = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu_0 \varepsilon_0}} \ .$

The left-hand side is the speed of light, and the right-hand side is a quantity related to the equations governing electricity and magnetism. Although the right-hand side has units of velocity, it can be inferred from measurements of electric and magnetic forces, which involve no physical velocities. Therefore, establishing this relationship provided convincing evidence that light is an electromagnetic phenomenon.

The discovery of this relationship started in 1855, when Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch determined that there was a quantity related to electricity and magnetism, "the ratio of the absolute electromagnetic unit of charge to the absolute electrostatic unit of charge" (in modern language, the value $1/\sqrt{\mu_0 \varepsilon_0}$), and determined that it should have units of velocity. They then measured this ratio by an experiment which involved charging and discharging a Leyden jar and measuring the magnetic force from the discharge current, and found a value 3.107×108 m/s,[20] remarkably close to the speed of light, which had recently been measured at 3.14×108 m/s by Hippolyte Fizeau in 1848 and at 2.98×108 m/s by Léon Foucault in 1850.[20] However, Weber and Kohlrausch did not make the connection to the speed of light.[20] Towards the end of 1861 while working on part III of his paper On Physical Lines of Force, Maxwell travelled from Scotland to London and looked up Weber and Kohlrausch's results. He converted them into a format which was compatible with his own writings, and in doing so he established the connection to the speed of light and concluded that light is a form of electromagnetic radiation.[21]

### The term Maxwell's equations

The four modern Maxwell's equations can be found individually throughout his 1861 paper, derived theoretically using a molecular vortex model of Michael Faraday's "lines of force" and in conjunction with the experimental result of Weber and Kohlrausch. But it wasn't until 1884 that Oliver Heaviside,[22] concurrently with similar work by Willard Gibbs and Heinrich Hertz,[23] grouped the four together into a distinct set. This group of four equations was known variously as the Hertz-Heaviside equations and the Maxwell-Hertz equations,[22] and are sometimes still known as the Maxwell–Heaviside equations.[24]

Maxwell's contribution to science in producing these equations lies in the correction he made to Ampère's circuital law in his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force. He added the displacement current term to Ampère's circuital law and this enabled him to derive the electromagnetic wave equation in his later 1865 paper A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field and demonstrate the fact that light is an electromagnetic wave. This fact was then later confirmed experimentally by Heinrich Hertz in 1887. The physicist Richard Feynman predicted that, "The American Civil War will pale into provincial insignificance in comparison with this important scientific event of the same decade."[25]

The concept of fields was introduced by, among others, Faraday. Albert Einstein wrote:

The precise formulation of the time-space laws was the work of Maxwell. Imagine his feelings when the differential equations he had formulated proved to him that electromagnetic fields spread in the form of polarised waves, and at the speed of light! To few men in the world has such an experience been vouchsafed ... it took physicists some decades to grasp the full significance of Maxwell's discovery, so bold was the leap that his genius forced upon the conceptions of his fellow-workers
—(Science, May 24, 1940)

Heaviside worked to eliminate the potentials (electric potential and magnetic potential) that Maxwell had used as the central concepts in his equations;[22] this effort was somewhat controversial,[26] though it was understood by 1884 that the potentials must propagate at the speed of light like the fields, unlike the concept of instantaneous action-at-a-distance like the then conception of gravitational potential.[23] Modern analysis of, for example, radio antennas, makes full use of Maxwell's vector and scalar potentials to separate the variables, a common technique used in formulating the solutions of differential equations. However, the potentials can be introduced by algebraic manipulation of the four fundamental equations.

### On Physical Lines of Force

The four modern day Maxwell's equations appeared throughout Maxwell's 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force:

1. Equation (56) in Maxwell's 1861 paper is ∇ ⋅ B = 0.
2. Equation (112) is Ampère's circuital law with Maxwell's displacement current added. It is the addition of displacement current that is the most significant aspect of Maxwell's work in electromagnetism, as it enabled him to later derive the electromagnetic wave equation in his 1865 paper A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field, and hence show that light is an electromagnetic wave. It is therefore this aspect of Maxwell's work which gives the equations their full significance. (Interestingly, Kirchhoff derived the telegrapher's equations in 1857 without using displacement current. But he did use Poisson's equation and the equation of continuity which are the mathematical ingredients of the displacement current. Nevertheless, Kirchhoff believed his equations to be applicable only inside an electric wire and so he is not credited with having discovered that light is an electromagnetic wave).
3. Equation (115) is Gauss's law.
4. Equation (54) is an equation that Oliver Heaviside referred to as 'Faraday's law'. This equation caters for the time varying aspect of electromagnetic induction, but not for the motionally induced aspect, whereas Faraday's original flux law caters for both aspects.[27][28] Maxwell deals with the motionally dependent aspect of electromagnetic induction, v × B, at equation (77). Equation (77) which is the same as equation (D) in the original eight Maxwell's equations listed below, corresponds to all intents and purposes to the modern day force law F = q( E + v × B ) which sits adjacent to Maxwell's equations and bears the name Lorentz force, even though Maxwell derived it when Lorentz was still a young boy.

The difference between the B and the H vectors can be traced back to Maxwell's 1855 paper entitled On Faraday's Lines of Force which was read to the Cambridge Philosophical Society. The paper presented a simplified model of Faraday's work, and how the two phenomena were related. He reduced all of the current knowledge into a linked set of differential equations.

Figure of Maxwell's molecular vortex model. For a uniform magnetic field, the field lines point outward from the display screen, as can be observed from the black dots in the middle of the hexagons. The vortex of each hexagonal molecule rotates counter-clockwise. The small green circles are clockwise rotating particles sandwiching between the molecular vortices.

It is later clarified in his concept of a sea of molecular vortices that appears in his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force. Within that context, H represented pure vorticity (spin), whereas B was a weighted vorticity that was weighted for the density of the vortex sea. Maxwell considered magnetic permeability µ to be a measure of the density of the vortex sea. Hence the relationship,

1. Magnetic induction current causes a magnetic current density
$\mathbf{B} = \mu \mathbf{H}$

was essentially a rotational analogy to the linear electric current relationship,

1. Electric convection current
$\mathbf{J} = \rho \mathbf{v}$

where ρ is electric charge density. B was seen as a kind of magnetic current of vortices aligned in their axial planes, with H being the circumferential velocity of the vortices. With µ representing vortex density, it follows that the product of µ with vorticity H leads to the magnetic field denoted as B.

The electric current equation can be viewed as a convective current of electric charge that involves linear motion. By analogy, the magnetic equation is an inductive current involving spin. There is no linear motion in the inductive current along the direction of the B vector. The magnetic inductive current represents lines of force. In particular, it represents lines of inverse square law force.

The extension of the above considerations confirms that where B is to H, and where J is to ρ, then it necessarily follows from Gauss's law and from the equation of continuity of charge that E is to D. i.e. B parallels with E, whereas H parallels with D.

### A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field

In 1864 Maxwell published A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field in which he showed that light was an electromagnetic phenomenon. Confusion over the term "Maxwell's equations" sometimes arises because it has been used for a set of eight equations that appeared in Part III of Maxwell's 1864 paper A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field, entitled "General Equations of the Electromagnetic Field,"[29] and this confusion is compounded by the writing of six of those eight equations as three separate equations (one for each of the Cartesian axes), resulting in twenty equations and twenty unknowns. (As noted above, this terminology is not common: Modern references to the term "Maxwell's equations" refer to the Heaviside restatements.)

The eight original Maxwell's equations can be written in modern vector notation as follows:

(A) The law of total currents
$\mathbf{J}_{tot} = \mathbf{J} + \frac{\partial\mathbf{D}}{\partial t}$
(B) The equation of magnetic force
$\mu \mathbf{H} = \nabla \times \mathbf{A}$
(C) Ampère's circuital law
$\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{J}_\mathrm{tot}$
(D) Electromotive force created by convection, induction, and by static electricity. (This is in effect the Lorentz force)
$\mathbf{E} = \mu \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{H} - \frac{\partial\mathbf{A}}{\partial t}-\nabla \phi$
(E) The electric elasticity equation
$\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \mathbf{D}$
(F) Ohm's law
$\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{\sigma} \mathbf{J}$
(G) Gauss's law
$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = \rho$
(H) Equation of continuity
$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} = -\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}$

or

$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{J}_\mathrm{tot} = 0$
Notation
H is the magnetizing field, which Maxwell called the magnetic intensity.
J is the current density (withJtot being the total current including displacement current).[note 5]
D is the displacement field (called the electric displacement by Maxwell).
ρ is the free charge density (called the quantity of free electricity by Maxwell).
A is the magnetic potential (called the angular impulse by Maxwell).
E is called the electromotive force by Maxwell. The term electromotive force is nowadays used for voltage, but it is clear from the context that Maxwell's meaning corresponded more to the modern term electric field.
φ is the electric potential (which Maxwell also called electric potential).
σ is the electrical conductivity (Maxwell called the inverse of conductivity the specific resistance, what is now called the resistivity).

It is interesting to note the μv × H term that appears in equation D. Equation D is therefore effectively the Lorentz force, similarly to equation (77) of his 1861 paper (see above).

When Maxwell derives the electromagnetic wave equation in his 1865 paper, he uses equation D to cater for electromagnetic induction rather than Faraday's law of induction which is used in modern textbooks. (Faraday's law itself does not appear among his equations.) However, Maxwell drops the μv × H term from equation D when he is deriving the electromagnetic wave equation, as he considers the situation only from the rest frame.

### A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism

In A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, an 1873 treatise on electromagnetism written by James Clerk Maxwell, eleven general equations of the electromagnetic field are listed and these include the eight that are listed in the 1865 paper.[30]

### Maxwell's equations and relativity

Maxwell's original equations are based on the idea that light travels through a sea of molecular vortices known as the 'luminiferous aether', and that the speed of light has to be respective to the reference frame of this aether. Measurements designed to measure the speed of the Earth through the aether conflicted, though.[31]

A more theoretical approach was suggested by Hendrik Lorentz along with George FitzGerald and Joseph Larmor. Both Larmor (1897) and Lorentz (1899, 1904) derived the Lorentz transformation (so named by Henri Poincaré) as one under which Maxwell's equations were invariant. Poincaré (1900) analyzed the coordination of moving clocks by exchanging light signals. He also established mathematically the group property of the Lorentz transformation (Poincaré 1905).

Einstein dismissed the aether as unnecessary and concluded that Maxwell's equations predict the existence of a fixed speed of light, independent of the speed of the observer, and as such he used Maxwell's equations as the starting point for his special theory of relativity. In doing so, he established the Lorentz transformation as being valid for all matter and not just Maxwell's equations. Maxwell's equations played a key role in Einstein's famous paper on special relativity; for example, in the opening paragraph of the paper, he motivated his theory by noting that a description of a conductor moving with respect to a magnet must generate a consistent set of fields irrespective of whether the force is calculated in the rest frame of the magnet or that of the conductor.[32]

General relativity has also had a close relationship with Maxwell's equations. For example, Theodor Kaluza and Oskar Klein showed in the 1920s that Maxwell's equations can be derived by extending general relativity into five dimensions. This strategy of using higher dimensions to unify different forces remains an active area of research in particle physics.

## Modified to include magnetic monopoles

Maxwell's equations provide for an electric charge, but posit no magnetic charge. Magnetic charge has never been seen[33] and may not exist. Nevertheless, Maxwell's equations including magnetic charge (and magnetic current) is of some theoretical interest.[34]

For one reason, Maxwell's equations can be made fully symmetric under interchange of electric and magnetic field by allowing for the possibility of magnetic charges with magnetic charge density ρm and currents with magnetic current density Jm.[35] The extended Maxwell's equations (in cgs-Gaussian units) are:

Name Without magnetic monopoles With magnetic monopoles (hypothetical)
Gauss's law: $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 4 \pi \rho_\mathrm{e}$ $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 4 \pi \rho_\mathrm{e}$
Gauss's law for magnetism: $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0$ $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 4 \pi \rho_\mathrm{m}$
$-\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}} {\partial t}$ $-\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} + \frac{4 \pi}{c} \mathbf{j}_\mathrm{m}$
Ampère's law
(with Maxwell's extension):
$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}} {\partial t} + \frac{4 \pi}{c} \mathbf{j}_\mathrm{e}$ $\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \mathbf{E}} {\partial t} + \frac{4 \pi}{c} \mathbf{j}_\mathrm{e}$

If magnetic charges do not exist, or if they exist but not in the region studied, then the new variables are zero, and the symmetric equations reduce to the conventional equations of electromagnetism such as ∇ · B = 0. Further, if every particle has the same ratio of electric to magnetic charge, then an E and a B field can be defined that obeys the normal Maxwell's equation (having no magnetic charges or currents) with its own charge and current densities.[36]

## Solving Maxwell's equations

Maxwell's equations are partial differential equations that relate the electric and magnetic fields to each other and to the electric charges and currents. Often, the charges and currents are themselves dependent on the electric and magnetic fields via the Lorentz force equation and the constitutive relations. These all form a set of coupled partial differential equations, which are often very difficult to solve. In fact, the solutions of these equations encompass all the diverse phenomena in the entire field of classical electromagnetism. A thorough discussion is far beyond the scope of the article, but some general notes follow:

• Like any differential equation, boundary conditions[37][38][39] and initial conditions[40] are necessary for a unique solution. For example, even with no charges and no currents anywhere in spacetime, many solutions to Maxwell's equations are possible, not just the obvious solution E=B=0. Another solution is E=constant, B=constant, while yet other solutions have electromagnetic waves filling spacetime. In some cases, Maxwell's equations are solved through infinite space, and boundary conditions are given as asymptotic limits at infinity.[41] In other cases, Maxwell's equations are solved in just a finite region of space, with appropriate boundary conditions on that region: For example, the boundary could be a artificial absorbing boundary representing the rest of the universe,[42][43] or periodic boundary conditions, or (as with a waveguide or cavity resonator) the boundary conditions may describe the walls that isolate a small region from the outside world.[44]
• Jefimenko's equations (or the closely related Liénard–Wiechert potentials) are the explicit solution to Maxwell's equations for the electric and magnetic fields created by any given distribution of charges and currents. It assumes specific initial conditions to obtain the so-called "retarded solution", where the only fields present are the ones created by the charges. Jefimenko's equations are not so helpful in situations when the charges and currents are themselves affected by the fields they create.
• Numerical methods for differential equations can be used to approximately solve Maxwell's equations when an exact solution is impossible. These methods usually require a computer, and include the finite element method and finite-difference time-domain method.[37][39][45][46][47] For more details, see Computational electromagnetics.

## Gaussian units

Gaussian units is a popular electromagnetism variant of the centimetre gram second system of units (cgs). In gaussian units, Maxwell's equations are:[48]

$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = 4\pi\rho_\mathrm{f}$
$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{1}{c} \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}} {\partial t}$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \frac{1}{c} \frac{\partial \mathbf{D}} {\partial t} + \frac{4\pi}{c} \mathbf{J}_\mathrm{f}$

where c is the speed of light in a vacuum. The microscopic equations are:

$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 4\pi\rho_{\mathrm{tot}}$
$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{1}{c} \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}} {\partial t}$
$\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \frac{1}{c} \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} + \frac{4\pi}{c}\mathbf{J}_{\mathrm{tot}}.$

The relation between electric displacement field, electric field and polarization density is:

$\mathbf{D} = \mathbf{E} + 4\pi\mathbf{P}.$

And likewise the relation between magnetic induction, magnetic field and total magnetization is:

$\mathbf{B} = \mathbf{H} + 4\pi\mathbf{M}.$

In the linear approximation, the electric susceptibility and magnetic susceptibility are defined so that:

$\mathbf{P} = \chi_\mathrm{e} \mathbf{E}$,     $\mathbf{M} = \chi_\mathrm{m} \mathbf{H}.$

(Note: although the susceptibilities are dimensionless numbers in both cgs and SI, they differ in value by a factor of 4π.) The permittivity and permeability are:

$\ \varepsilon = 1+4\pi\chi_\mathrm{e}$,     $\ \mu = 1+4\pi\chi_\mathrm{m},$

so that

$\mathbf{D} = \varepsilon \mathbf{E}$,     $\mathbf{B} = \mu \mathbf{H}.$

In vacuum, ε = μ = 1, therefore D = E, and B = H.

The force exerted upon a charged particle by the electric field and magnetic field is given by the Lorentz force equation:

$\mathbf{F} = q \left(\mathbf{E} + \frac{\mathbf{v}}{c} \times \mathbf{B}\right),$

where q is the charge on the particle and v is the particle velocity. This is slightly different from the SI-unit expression above. For example, the magnetic field B has the same units as the electric field E.

Some equations in the article are given in Gaussian units but not SI or vice-versa. Fortunately, there are general rules to convert from one to the other; see the article Gaussian units for details.

## Alternative formulations of Maxwell's equations

Special relativity motivated a compact mathematical formulation of Maxwell's equations, in terms of covariant tensors. Quantum mechanics also motivated other formulations.

For example, consider a conductor moving in the field of a magnet.[49] In the frame of the magnet, that conductor experiences a magnetic force. But in the frame of a conductor moving relative to the magnet, the conductor experiences a force due to an electric field. The following formulation shows how Maxwell's equations take the same form in any inertial coordinate system.

### In terms of a minimum action principle

For the field formulation of Maxwell's equations in terms of a principle of extremal action, see the article on the electromagnetic tensor.

### Covariant formulation of Maxwell's equations

In special relativity, in order to more clearly express the fact that Maxwell's ('microscopic') equations take the same form in any inertial coordinate system, Maxwell's equations are written in terms of four-vectors and tensors in the "manifestly covariant" form. The purely spatial components of the following are in SI units.

One ingredient in this formulation is the electromagnetic tensor, a rank-2 covariant antisymmetric tensor combining the electric and magnetic fields:

$F_{\alpha \beta} = \left( \begin{matrix} 0 & \frac{-E_\mathrm{x}}{c} & \frac{-E_\mathrm{y}}{c} & \frac{-E_\mathrm{z}}{c} \\ \frac{E_\mathrm{x}}{c} & 0 & B_\mathrm{z} & -B_\mathrm{y} \\ \frac{E_\mathrm{y}}{c} & -B_\mathrm{z} & 0 & B_\mathrm{x} \\ \frac{E_\mathrm{z}}{c} & B_\mathrm{y} & -B_\mathrm{x} & 0 \end{matrix} \right)$

and the result of raising its indices

$F^{\mu \nu} \, \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} \, \eta^{\mu \alpha} \, F_{\alpha \beta} \, \eta^{\beta \nu} = \left( \begin{matrix} 0 & \frac{E_\mathrm{x}}{c} & \frac{E_\mathrm{y}}{c} & \frac{E_\mathrm{z}}{c} \\ \frac{-E_\mathrm{x}}{c} & 0 & B_\mathrm{z} & -B_\mathrm{y} \\ \frac{-E_\mathrm{y}}{c} & -B_\mathrm{z} & 0 & B_\mathrm{x} \\ \frac{-E_\mathrm{z}}{c} & B_\mathrm{y} & -B_\mathrm{x} & 0 \end{matrix} \right).$

The other ingredient is the four-current:

$J^{\alpha} = (c\rho,\vec{J})$

where ρ is the charge density and J is the current density.

With these ingredients, Maxwell's equations can be written:

$\mu_{0} \, J^{\beta} \, = \, {\partial F^{\beta\alpha} \over {\partial x^{\alpha}} } \, \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} \, \partial_{\alpha} F^{\beta\alpha} \, \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} \, {F^{\beta\alpha}}_{,\alpha} \,$

and

$0 = \partial_{\gamma} F_{\alpha\beta} + \partial_{\beta} F_{\gamma\alpha} + \partial_{\alpha} F_{\beta\gamma} \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ {F_{\alpha\beta}}_{,\gamma} + {F_{\gamma\alpha}}_{,\beta} +{F_{\beta\gamma}}_{,\alpha}.$

The first tensor equation is an expression of the two inhomogeneous Maxwell's equations, Gauss's law and Ampère's law with Maxwell's correction. The second equation is an expression of the two homogeneous equations, Faraday's law of induction and Gauss's law for magnetism. The second equation is equivalent to

$0 = \epsilon^{\delta\alpha\beta\gamma} {F_{\beta\gamma}}_{,\alpha}$

where $\, \epsilon^{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}$ is the contravariant version of the Levi-Civita symbol, and

${ \partial \over { \partial x^{\alpha} } } \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ \partial_{\alpha} \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ {}_{,\alpha} \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ \left(\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}, \nabla\right)$

is the 4-gradient. In the tensor equations above, repeated indices are summed over according to Einstein summation convention. We have displayed the results in several common notations. Upper and lower components of a vector, vα and vα respectively, are interchanged with the fundamental tensor g, e.g., g = η = diag(−1, +1, +1, +1).

Alternative covariant presentations of Maxwell's equations also exist, for example in terms of the four-potential; see Covariant formulation of classical electromagnetism for details.

### Potential formulation

In advanced classical mechanics and in quantum mechanics (where it is necessary) it is sometimes useful to express Maxwell's equations in a 'potential formulation' involving the electric potential (also called scalar potential), φ, and the magnetic potential, A, (also called vector potential). These are defined such that:

$\mathbf E = - \mathbf \nabla \varphi - \frac{\partial \mathbf A}{\partial t},$
$\mathbf B = \mathbf \nabla \times \mathbf A.$

With these definitions, the two homogeneous Maxwell's equations (Faraday's Law and Gauss's law for magnetism) are automatically satisfied and the other two (inhomogeneous) equations give the following equations (for "Maxwell's microscopic equations"):

$\nabla^2 \varphi + \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left ( \mathbf \nabla \cdot \mathbf A \right ) = - \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}$
$\left ( \nabla^2 \mathbf A - \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial^2 \mathbf A}{\partial t^2} \right ) - \mathbf \nabla \left ( \mathbf \nabla \cdot \mathbf A + \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial t} \right ) = - \mu_0 \mathbf J.$

These equations, taken together, are as powerful and complete as Maxwell's equations. Moreover, if we work only with the potentials and ignore the fields, the problem has been reduced somewhat, as the electric and magnetic fields each have three components which need to be solved for (six components altogether), while the electric and magnetic potentials have only four components altogether.

Many different choices of A and φ are consistent with a given E and B, making these choices physically equivalent – a flexibility known as gauge freedom. Suitable choice of A and φ can simplify these equations, or can adapt them to suit a particular situation.

### Four-potential

In the Lorenz gauge, the two equations that represent the potentials can be reduced to one manifestly Lorentz invariant equation, using four-vectors: the four-current defined by

$j^\mu = \left( \rho c, \mathbf{j} \right)$

formed from the current density j and charge density ρ, and the electromagnetic four-potential defined by

$A^\mu = \left( \varphi , \mathbf{A} c \right)$

formed from the vector potential A and the scalar potential $\varphi \,$. The resulting single equation, due to Arnold Sommerfeld, a generalization of an equation due to Bernhard Riemann and known as the Riemann–Sommerfeld equation[50] or the covariant form of the Maxwell equations,[51] is:

$\Box A^\mu = \mu_0 j^\mu$,

where $\Box=\partial^2=\partial_\alpha\partial^\alpha$ is the d'Alembertian operator, or four-Laplacian, $\left( {\partial^2 \over \partial t^2} - \nabla^2 \right)$, sometimes written $\Box^2$, or $\Box \cdot \Box$, where $\Box$ is the four-gradient.

### Differential geometric formulations

In free space, where ε = ε0 and μ = μ0 are constant everywhere, Maxwell's equations simplify considerably once the language of differential geometry and differential forms is used. In what follows, cgs-Gaussian units, not SI units are used. (To convert to SI, see here.) The electric and magnetic fields are now jointly described by a 2-form F in a 4-dimensional spacetime manifold. Maxwell's equations then reduce to the Bianchi identity

$\mathrm{d}\bold{F}=0$

where d denotes the exterior derivative — a natural coordinate and metric independent differential operator acting on forms — and the source equation

$\mathrm {d} * {\bold{F}}=\bold{J}$

where the (dual) Hodge star operator * is a linear transformation from the space of 2-forms to the space of (4-2)-forms defined by the metric in Minkowski space (in four dimensions even by any metric conformal to this metric), and the fields are in natural units where 1/4πε0 = 1. Here, the 3-form J is called the electric current form or current 3-form satisfying the continuity equation

$\mathrm{d}{\bold{J}}=0.$

The current 3-form can be integrated over a 3-dimensional space-time region. The physical interpretation of this integral is the charge in that region if it is spacelike, or the amount of charge that flows through a surface in a certain amount of time if that region is a spacelike surface cross a timelike interval. As the exterior derivative is defined on any manifold, the differential form version of the Bianchi identity makes sense for any 4-dimensional manifold, whereas the source equation is defined if the manifold is oriented and has a Lorentz metric. In particular the differential form version of the Maxwell equations are a convenient and intuitive formulation of the Maxwell equations in general relativity.

In a linear, macroscopic theory, the influence of matter on the electromagnetic field is described through more general linear transformation in the space of 2-forms. We call

$C:\Lambda^2\ni\bold{F}\mapsto \bold{G}\in\Lambda^{(4-2)}$

the constitutive transformation. The role of this transformation is comparable to the Hodge duality transformation. The Maxwell equations in the presence of matter then become:

$\mathrm{d}\bold{F} = 0$
$\mathrm{d}\bold{G} = \bold{J}$

where the current 3-form J still satisfies the continuity equation dJ = 0.

When the fields are expressed as linear combinations (of exterior products) of basis forms θp,

$\bold{F} = \frac{1}{2}F_{pq}\bold{\theta}^p\wedge\bold{\theta}^q.$

the constitutive relation takes the form

$G_{pq} = C_{pq}^{mn}F_{mn}$

where the field coefficient functions are antisymmetric in the indices and the constitutive coefficients are antisymmetric in the corresponding pairs. In particular, the Hodge duality transformation leading to the vacuum equations discussed above are obtained by taking

$C_{pq}^{mn} = \frac{1}{2}g^{ma}g^{nb} \epsilon_{abpq} \sqrt{-g}$

which up to scaling is the only invariant tensor of this type that can be defined with the metric.

In this formulation, electromagnetism generalises immediately to any 4-dimensional oriented manifold or with small adaptations any manifold, requiring not even a metric. Thus the expression of Maxwell's equations in terms of differential forms leads to a further notational and conceptual simplification. Whereas Maxwell's Equations could be written as two tensor equations instead of eight scalar equations, from which the propagation of electromagnetic disturbances and the continuity equation could be derived with a little effort, using differential forms leads to an even simpler derivation of these results.

#### Conceptual insight from this formulation

On the conceptual side, from the point of view of physics, this shows that the second and third Maxwell equations should be grouped together, be called the homogeneous ones, and be seen as geometric identities expressing nothing else than: the field F derives from a more "fundamental" potential A. While the first and last one should be seen as the dynamical equations of motion, obtained via the Lagrangian principle of least action, from the "interaction term" A J (introduced through gauge covariant derivatives), coupling the field to matter.

Often, the time derivative in the third law motivates calling this equation "dynamical", which is somewhat misleading; in the sense of the preceding analysis, this is rather an artifact of breaking relativistic covariance by choosing a preferred time direction. To have physical degrees of freedom propagated by these field equations, one must include a kinetic term F *F for A; and take into account the non-physical degrees of freedom which can be removed by gauge transformation AA' = A − dα. See also gauge fixing and Faddeev–Popov ghosts.

### Geometric algebra (GA) formulation

In geometric algebra, Maxwell's equations are reduced to a single equation,

$\left(\frac{1}{c}\partial_t + \boldsymbol{\nabla}\right)F = \mu_0 c J,$[52]

where F and J are multivectors

$F = \bold{E} + Ic\bold{B}$

and

$J = c \rho + \bold{J}.$

with the unit pseudoscalar I2 = −1

The GA spatial gradient operator acts on a vector field, such that

$\boldsymbol{\nabla}\bold{F} = \boldsymbol{\nabla} \cdot \bold{F} + I \boldsymbol{\nabla} \times \bold{F},$

In spacetime algebra using the same geometric product the equation is simply

$\nabla F = \mu_0 c J,$

the spacetime derivative of the electromagnetic field is its source. Here the (non-bold) spacetime gradient

$\nabla = \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu$

is a four vector, as is the current density

$J = \gamma_\mu J^\mu = \gamma_0 c \rho + J^k \gamma_k = (c \rho + \bold{J})\gamma_0.$

For a demonstration that the equations given reproduce Maxwell's equations see the main article.

## Classical electrodynamics as the curvature of a line bundle

An elegant and intuitive way to formulate Maxwell's equations is to use complex line bundles or principal bundles with fibre U(1). The connection $\nabla$ on the line bundle has a curvature $\bold{F} = \nabla^2$ which is a two-form that automatically satisfies $\mathrm{d}\bold{F} = 0$ and can be interpreted as a field-strength. If the line bundle is trivial with flat reference connection d we can write $\nabla = \mathrm{d}+\bold{A}$ and F = dA with A the 1-form composed of the electric potential and the magnetic vector potential.

In quantum mechanics, the connection itself is used to define the dynamics of the system. This formulation allows a natural description of the Aharonov–Bohm effect. In this experiment, a static magnetic field runs through a long magnetic wire (e.g., an iron wire magnetized longitudinally). Outside of this wire the magnetic induction is zero, in contrast to the vector potential, which essentially depends on the magnetic flux through the cross-section of the wire and does not vanish outside. Since there is no electric field either, the Maxwell tensor F = 0 throughout the space-time region outside the tube, during the experiment. This means by definition that the connection $\nabla$ is flat there.

However, as mentioned, the connection depends on the magnetic field through the tube since the holonomy along a non-contractible curve encircling the tube is the magnetic flux through the tube in the proper units. This can be detected quantum-mechanically with a double-slit electron diffraction experiment on an electron wave traveling around the tube. The holonomy corresponds to an extra phase shift, which leads to a shift in the diffraction pattern.[53][54]

## Curved spacetime

Matter and energy generate curvature of spacetime. This is the subject of general relativity. Curvature of spacetime affects electrodynamics. An electromagnetic field having energy and momentum also generates curvature in spacetime. Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime can be obtained by replacing the derivatives in the equations in flat spacetime with covariant derivatives. (Whether this is the appropriate generalization requires separate investigation.) The sourced and source-free equations become (cgs-Gaussian units):

${ 4 \pi \over c }j^{\beta} = \partial_{\alpha} F^{\alpha\beta} + {\Gamma^{\alpha}}_{\mu\alpha} F^{\mu\beta} + {\Gamma^{\beta}}_{\mu\alpha} F^{\alpha \mu} \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ \nabla_{\alpha} F^{\alpha\beta} \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=}\ {F^{\alpha\beta}}_{;\alpha} \, \!$

and

$0 = \partial_{\gamma} F_{\alpha\beta} + \partial_{\beta} F_{\gamma\alpha} + \partial_{\alpha} F_{\beta\gamma} = \nabla_{\gamma} F_{\alpha\beta} + \nabla_{\beta} F_{\gamma\alpha} + \nabla_{\alpha} F_{\beta\gamma}.\,$

Here,

${\Gamma^{\alpha}}_{\mu\beta} \!$

is a Christoffel symbol that characterizes the curvature of spacetime and α is the covariant derivative.

### Formulation in terms of differential forms

The formulation of the Maxwell equations in terms of differential forms can be used without change in general relativity. The equivalence of the more traditional general relativistic formulation using the covariant derivative with the differential form formulation can be seen as follows. Choose local coordinates xα which gives a basis of 1-forms dxα in every point of the open set where the coordinates are defined. Using this basis and cgs-Gaussian units we define

• The antisymmetric infinitesimal field tensor Fαβ, corresponding to the field 2-form F
$\bold{F} := \frac{1}{2}F_{\alpha\beta} \,\mathrm{d}\,x^{\alpha} \wedge \mathrm{d}\,x^{\beta}.$
• The current-vector infinitesimal 3-form J
$\bold{J} := {4 \pi \over c } j^{\alpha} \sqrt{-g} \, \epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta} \mathrm{d}\,x^{\beta} \wedge \mathrm{d}\,x^{\gamma} \wedge \mathrm{d}\,x^{\delta}.$

Here g is as usual the determinant of the metric tensor gαβ. A small computation that uses the symmetry of the Christoffel symbols (i.e., the torsion-freeness of the Levi-Civita connection) and the covariant constantness of the Hodge star operator then shows that in this coordinate neighborhood we have:

• the Bianchi identity
$\mathrm{d}\bold{F} = 2(\partial_{\gamma} F_{\alpha\beta} + \partial_{\beta} F_{\gamma\alpha} + \partial_{\alpha} F_{\beta\gamma})\mathrm{d}\,x^{\alpha}\wedge \mathrm{d}\,x^{\beta} \wedge \mathrm{d}\,x^{\gamma} = 0,$
• the source equation
$\mathrm{d} * \bold{F} = {F^{\alpha\beta}}_{;\alpha}\sqrt{-g} \, \epsilon_{\beta\gamma\delta\eta}\mathrm{d}\,x^{\gamma} \wedge \mathrm{d}\,x^{\delta} \wedge \mathrm{d}\,x^{\eta} = \bold{J},$
• the continuity equation
$\mathrm{d}\bold{J} = { 4 \pi \over c } {j^{\alpha}}_{;\alpha} \sqrt{-g} \, \epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}\mathrm{d}\,x^{\alpha}\wedge \mathrm{d}\,x^{\beta} \wedge \mathrm{d}\,x^{\gamma} \wedge \mathrm{d}\,x^{\delta} = 0.$

## Notes

1. ^ The quantity we would now call $\scriptstyle{1/\sqrt{\mu_0\varepsilon_0}}$, with units of velocity, was directly measured before Maxwell's equations, in an 1855 experiment by Wilhelm Eduard Weber and Rudolf Kohlrausch. They charged a leyden jar (a kind of capacitor), and measured the electrostatic force associated with the potential; then, they discharged it while measuring the magnetic force from the current in the discharge-wire. Their result was 3.107×108 m/s, remarkably close to the speed of light. See The story of electrical and magnetic measurements: from 500 B.C. to the 1940s, by Joseph F. Keithley, p115
2. ^ In some books *e.g., in[4]), the term effective charge is used instead of total charge, while free charge is simply called charge.
3. ^ In some books *e.g., in[4]), the term effective charge is used instead of total charge, while free charge is simply called charge.
4. ^ The free charges and currents respond to the fields through the Lorentz force law and this response is calculated at a fundamental level using mechanics. The response of bound charges and currents is dealt with using grosser methods subsumed under the notions of magnetization and polarization. Depending upon the problem, one may choose to have no free charges whatsoever.
5. ^ Here it is noted that a quite different quantity, the magnetic polarization, μ0M by decision of an international IUPAP commission has been given the same name J. So for the electric current density, a name with small letters, j would be better. But even then the mathematicians would still use the large-letter-name J for the corresponding current-twoform (see below).

## References

1. ^ a b c J.D. Jackson, "Maxwell's Equations" video glossary entry
2. ^ Principles of physics: a calculus-based text, by R.A. Serway, J.W. Jewett, page 809.
3. ^ David J Griffiths (1999). Introduction to electrodynamics (Third ed.). Prentice Hall. pp. 559–562. ISBN 013805326X.
4. ^ a b U. Krey and A. Owen's Basic Theoretical Physics (Springer 2007)
5. ^ Šolín, Pavel (2006). Partial differential equations and the finite element method. John Wiley and Sons. p. 273. ISBN 0471720704.
6. ^ See David J. Griffiths (1999). Introduction to Electrodynamics (third ed.). Prentice Hall.  for a good description of how P relates to the bound charge.
7. ^ See David J. Griffiths (1999). Introduction to Electrodynamics (third ed.). Prentice Hall.  for a good description of how M relates to the bound current.
8. ^ The generalization to non-isotropic materials is straight forward; simply replace the constants with tensor quantities.
9. ^ In general materials are bianisotropic. TG Mackay and A Lakhtakia (2010). Electromagnetic Anisotropy and Bianisotropy: A Field Guide. World Scientific.
10. ^ Halevi, Peter (1992). Spatial dispersion in solids and plasmas. Amsterdam: North-Holland. ISBN 978-0444874054.
11. ^ Jackson, John David (1999). Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-30932-X.
12. ^ Note that the 'magnetic susceptibility' term used here is in terms of B and is different from the standard definition in terms of H.
13. ^ Aspnes, D.E., "Local-field effects and effective-medium theory: A microscopic perspective," Am. J. Phys. 50, p. 704-709 (1982).
14. ^ Habib Ammari & Hyeonbae Kang (2006). Inverse problems, multi-scale analysis and effective medium theory : workshop in Seoul, Inverse problems, multi-scale analysis, and homogenization, June 22–24, 2005, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. Providence RI: American Mathematical Society. p. 282. ISBN 0821839683.
15. ^ O. C. Zienkiewicz, Robert Leroy Taylor, J. Z. Zhu, Perumal Nithiarasu (2005). The Finite Element Method (Sixth ed.). Oxford UK: Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 550 ff. ISBN 0750663219.
16. ^ N. Bakhvalov and G. Panasenko, Homogenization: Averaging Processes in Periodic Media (Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1989); V. V. Jikov, S. M. Kozlov and O. A. Oleinik, Homogenization of Differential Operators and Integral Functionals (Springer: Berlin, 1994).
17. ^ Vitaliy Lomakin, Steinberg BZ, Heyman E, & Felsen LB (2003). "Multiresolution Homogenization of Field and Network Formulations for Multiscale Laminate Dielectric Slabs". IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 51 (10): 2761 ff. Bibcode 2003ITAP...51.2761L. doi:10.1109/TAP.2003.816356.
18. ^ AC Gilbert (Ronald R Coifman, Editor) (2000-05). Topics in Analysis and Its Applications: Selected Theses. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company. p. 155. ISBN 9810240945.
19. ^ Edward D. Palik & Ghosh G (1998). Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids. London UK: Academic Press. p. 1114. ISBN 0125444222.
20. ^ a b c The story of electrical and magnetic measurements: from 500 B.C. to the 1940s, by Joseph F. Keithley, p115
21. ^ "The Dictionary of Scientific Biography", by Charles Coulston Gillispie
22. ^ a b c but are now universally known as Maxwell's equations. However, in 1940 Einstein referred to the equations as Maxwell's equations in "The Fundamentals of Theoretical Physics" published in the Washington periodical Science, May 24, 1940. Paul J. Nahin (2002-10-09). Oliver Heaviside: the life, work, and times of an electrical genius of the Victorian age. JHU Press. pp. 108–112. ISBN 9780801869099.
23. ^ a b Jed Z. Buchwald (1994). The creation of scientific effects: Heinrich Hertz and electric waves. University of Chicago Press. p. 194. ISBN 9780226078885.
24. ^ Myron Evans (2001-10-05). Modern nonlinear optics. John Wiley and Sons. p. 240. ISBN 9780471389316.
25. ^ Crease, Robert. The Great Equations: Breakthroughs in Science from Pythagoras to Heisenberg, page 133 (2008).
26. ^ Oliver J. Lodge (November 1888). "Sketch of the Electrical Papers in Section A, at the Recent Bath Meeting of the British Association". Electrical Engineer 7: 535.
27. ^ J. R. Lalanne, F. Carmona, and L. Servant (1999-11). Optical spectroscopies of electronic absorption. World Scientific. p. 8. ISBN 9789810238612.
28. ^ Roger F. Harrington (2003-10-17). Introduction to Electromagnetic Engineering. Courier Dover Publications. pp. 49–56. ISBN 9780486432410.
29. ^ page 480.
31. ^ Experiments like the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887 showed that the 'aether' moved at the same speed as Earth. While other experiments, such as measurements of the aberration of light from stars, showed that the ether is moving relative to earth.
32. ^ "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies". Fourmilab.ch. Retrieved 2008-10-19.
33. ^ Recently, scientists have described behavior in a crystalline state of matter known as spin-ice which have macroscopic behavior like magnetic monopoles. (See http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/1178868 and http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7266/full/nature08500.html .) The divergence of B is still zero for this system, though.
34. ^ J.D. Jackson. "6.12". Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). ISBN 047143132x.
35. ^ "IEEEGHN: Maxwell's Equations". Ieeeghn.org. Retrieved 2008-10-19.
36. ^ This is known as a duality transformation. See J.D. Jackson. "6.12". Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). ISBN 047143132x. .
37. ^ a b Peter Monk (2003). Finite Element Methods for Maxwell's Equations. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press. p. 1 ff. ISBN 0198508883.
38. ^ Thomas B. A. Senior & John Leonidas Volakis (1995-03-01). Approximate Boundary Conditions in Electromagnetics. London UK: Institution of Electrical Engineers. p. 261 ff. ISBN 0852968493.
39. ^ a b T Hagstrom (Björn Engquist & Gregory A. Kriegsmann, Eds.) (1997). Computational Wave Propagation. Berlin: Springer. p. 1 ff. ISBN 0387948740.
40. ^ Henning F. Harmuth & Malek G. M. Hussain (1994). Propagation of Electromagnetic Signals. Singapore: World Scientific. p. 17. ISBN 9810216890.
41. ^ David M Cook (2002). The Theory of the Electromagnetic Field. Mineola NY: Courier Dover Publications. p. 335 ff. ISBN 0486425673.
42. ^ Jean-Michel Lourtioz (2005-05-23). Photonic Crystals: Towards Nanoscale Photonic Devices. Berlin: Springer. p. 84. ISBN 354024431X.
43. ^ S. G. Johnson, Notes on Perfectly Matched Layers, online MIT course notes (Aug. 2007).
44. ^ S. F. Mahmoud (1991). Electromagnetic Waveguides: Theory and Applications applications. London UK: Institution of Electrical Engineers. Chapter 2. ISBN 0863412327.
45. ^ John Leonidas Volakis, Arindam Chatterjee & Leo C. Kempel (1998). Finite element method for electromagnetics : antennas, microwave circuits, and scattering applications. New York: Wiley IEEE. p. 79 ff. ISBN 0780334256.
46. ^ Bernard Friedman (1990). Principles and Techniques of Applied Mathematics. Mineola NY: Dover Publications. ISBN 0486664449.
47. ^ Taflove A & Hagness S C (2005). Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-difference Time-domain Method. Boston MA: Artech House. Chapters 6 & 7. ISBN 1580538320.
48. ^ Littlejohn, Robert (Fall 2007). "Gaussian, SI and Other Systems of Units in Electromagnetic Theory" (PDF). Physics 221A, University of California, Berkeley lecture notes. Retrieved 2008-05-06.
49. ^ Albert Einstein (1905) On the electrodynamics of moving bodies
50. ^ Carver A. Mead (2002-08-07). Collective Electrodynamics: Quantum Foundations of Electromagnetism. MIT Press. pp. 37–38. ISBN 9780262632607.
51. ^ Frederic V. Hartemann (2002). High-field electrodynamics. CRC Press. p. 102. ISBN 9780849323782.
52. ^ Oersted Medal Lecture David Hestenes (Am. J. Phys. 71 (2), February 2003, pp. 104–121) Online:http://geocalc.clas.asu.edu/html/Oersted-ReformingTheLanguage.html p26
53. ^ M. Murray (5 September 2008). "Line Bundles. Honours 1996". University of Adelaide. Retrieved 2010-11-19.
54. ^ R. Bott (1985). "On some recent interactions between mathematics and physics". Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 28 (2): 129–164. doi:10.4153/CMB-1985-016-3.

### Journal articles

The developments before relativity

• Joseph Larmor (1897) "On a dynamical theory of the electric and luminiferous medium", Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 190, 205-300 (third and last in a series of papers with the same name).
• Hendrik Lorentz (1899) "Simplified theory of electrical and optical phenomena in moving systems", Proc. Acad. Science Amsterdam, I, 427-43.
• Hendrik Lorentz (1904) "Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity less than that of light", Proc. Acad. Science Amsterdam, IV, 669-78.
• Henri Poincaré (1900) "La theorie de Lorentz et la Principe de Reaction", Archives Néerlandaises, V, 253-78.
• Henri Poincaré (1901) Science and Hypothesis
• Henri Poincaré (1905) "Sur la dynamique de l'électron", Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, 140, 1504-8.

see

### University level textbooks

• Feynman, Richard P. (2005). The Feynman Lectures on Physics. 2 (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0805390650.
• Fleisch, Daniel (2008). A Student's Guide to Maxwell's Equations. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521877619.
• Griffiths, David J. (1998). Introduction to Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-805326-X.
• Hoffman, Banesh (1983). Relativity and Its Roots. W. H. Freeman.
• Krey, U.; Owen, A. (2007). Basic Theoretical Physics: A Concise Overview. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-36804-5.  See especially part II.
• Purcell, Edward Mills (1985). Electricity and Magnetism. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-004908-4.
• Reitz, John R.; Milford, Frederick J.; Christy, Robert W. (2008). Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory (4th ed.). Addison Wesley. ISBN 978-0321581747.
• Sadiku, Matthew N. O. (2006). Elements of Electromagnetics (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-5300483.
• Schwarz, Melvin (1987). Principles of Electrodynamics. Dover. ISBN 0-486-65493-1.
• Stevens, Charles F. (1995). The Six Core Theories of Modern Physics. MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-69188-4.
• Tipler, Paul; Mosca, Gene (2007). Physics for Scientists and Engineers. 2 (6th ed.). W. H. Freeman. ISBN 978-1429201339.
• Ulaby, Fawwaz T. (2007). Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics (5th ed.). Pearson Education. ISBN 0-13-241326-4.

#### Computational techniques

• Chew, W. C.; Jin, J.; Michielssen, E. ; Song, J. (2001). Fast and Efficient Algorithms in Computational Electromagnetics. Artech House. ISBN 1-58053-152-0.
• Harrington, R. F. (1993). Field Computation by Moment Methods. Wiley-IEEE Press. ISBN 0-78031-014-4.
• Jin, J. (2002). The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics (2nd ed.). Wiley-IEEE Press. ISBN 0-47143-818-9.
• Lounesto, Pertti (1997). Clifford Algebras and Spinors. Cambridge University Press.. ISBN 0521599164.  Chapter 8 sets out several variants of the equations using exterior algebra and differential forms.
• Taflove, Allen; Hagness, Susan C. (2005). Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method (3rd ed.). Artech House. ISBN 1-58053-832-0.

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

### Look at other dictionaries:

• Maxwell-Bloch Equations — The Maxwell Bloch equations describe the dynamics of a two state quantum system interacting with the electromagnetic mode of an optical resonator. The equations can be derived either semiclassically, or with the field fully quantized under… …   Wikipedia

• Maxwell's Equations —    , MAXWELX S LAW    Although the name James Clerk Maxwell is not well known today, he made remarkable contributions to the electromagnetic theory, known a Maxwell s Equations and Maxwell s Law. Through his keen knowledge of mathematics he… …   Dictionary of eponyms

• Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime — Induced spacetime curvature In physics, Maxwell s equations in curved spacetime govern the dynamics of the electromagnetic field in curved spacetime (where the metric may not be the Minkowski metric) or where one uses an arbitrary (not… …   Wikipedia

• Maxwell's equations — Four equations, formulated by James Clerk Maxwell, that together form a complete description of the production and interrelation of electric and magnetic fields. The statements of these four equations are (1) electric field diverges from electric …   Universalium

• Maxwell's equations — /mækswəlz əˈkweɪʒənz/ (say makswuhlz uh kwayzhuhnz) plural noun the basic equations of electromagnetism, relating charges, currents, electric fields, and magnetic fields, and predicting the behaviour of electromagnetic waves. {See maxwell} …

• Maxwell's equations — noun four differential equations that summarize classical properties of electromagnetic fields • Hypernyms: ↑differential equation …   Useful english dictionary

• Equations de Maxwell — Équations de Maxwell  Ne doit pas être confondu avec Relations de Maxwell. Les équations de Maxwell, aussi appelées équations de Maxwell Lorentz, sont des lois fondamentales de la physique. Elles constituent les postulats de base de l… …   Wikipédia en Français

• Maxwell-Faraday — Équations de Maxwell  Ne doit pas être confondu avec Relations de Maxwell. Les équations de Maxwell, aussi appelées équations de Maxwell Lorentz, sont des lois fondamentales de la physique. Elles constituent les postulats de base de l… …   Wikipédia en Français

• Équations de Maxwell pour les nuls — Équations de Maxwell  Ne doit pas être confondu avec Relations de Maxwell. Les équations de Maxwell, aussi appelées équations de Maxwell Lorentz, sont des lois fondamentales de la physique. Elles constituent les postulats de base de l… …   Wikipédia en Français

• Équations de maxwell —  Ne doit pas être confondu avec Relations de Maxwell. Les équations de Maxwell, aussi appelées équations de Maxwell Lorentz, sont des lois fondamentales de la physique. Elles constituent les postulats de base de l électromagnétisme, avec l… …   Wikipédia en Français