Classical electromagnetism

Electromagnetism
Electricity · Magnetism
Electrostatics Electric charge · Coulomb's law · Electric field · Electric flux · Gauss's law · Electric potential energy · Electric potential · Electrostatic induction · Electric dipole moment · Polarization density
Magnetostatics Ampère's law · Electric current · Magnetic field · Magnetization · Magnetic flux · Biot–Savart law · Magnetic dipole moment · Gauss's law for magnetism
Electrodynamics Lorentz force law · emf · Electromagnetic induction · Faraday’s law · Lenz's law · Displacement current · Maxwell's equations · EM field · Electromagnetic radiation · Liénard–Wiechert potential · Maxwell tensor · Eddy current
Electrical Network Electrical conduction · Electrical resistance · Capacitance · Inductance · Impedance · Resonant cavities · Waveguides
Covariant formulation Electromagnetic tensor · EM Stress-energy tensor · Four-current · Electromagnetic four-potential
Scientists Ampère · Coulomb · Faraday · Gauss · Heaviside · Henry · Hertz · Lorentz · Maxwell · Tesla · Volta · Weber · Ørsted
v · d · e

Classical electromagnetism (or classical electrodynamics) is a branch of theoretical physics that studies consequences of the electromagnetic forces between electric charges and currents. It provides an excellent description of electromagnetic phenomena whenever the relevant length scales and field strengths are large enough that quantum mechanical effects are negligible (see quantum electrodynamics). Fundamental physical aspects of classical electrodynamics are presented e.g. by Feynman, Leighton and Sands,^[1] Panofsky and Phillips,^[2] and Jackson.^[3]

The theory of electromagnetism was developed over the course of the 19th century, most prominently by James Clerk Maxwell. For a detailed historical account, consult Pauli,^[4] Whittaker,^[5] and Pais.^[6] See also History of optics, History of electromagnetism and Maxwell's equations.

Ribarič and Šušteršič^[7] considered a dozen open questions in the current understanding of classical electrodynamics; to this end they studied and cited about 240 references from 1903 to 1989. The outstanding problem with classical electrodynamics, as stated by Jackson,^[3] is that we are able to obtain and study relevant solutions of its basic equations only in two limiting cases: »... one in which the sources of charges and currents are specified and the resulting electromagnetic fields are calculated, and the other in which external electromagnetic fields are specified and the motion of charged particles or currents is calculated... Occasionally, ..., the two problems are combined. But the treatment is a stepwise one -- first the motion of the charged particle in the external field is determined, neglecting the emission of radiation; then the radiation is calculated from the trajectory as a given source distribution. It is evident that this manner of handling problems in electrodynamics can be of only approximative validity.« As a consequence, we do not yet have physical understanding of those electromechanical systems where we cannot neglect the mutual interaction between electric charges and currents, and the electromagnetic field emitted by them. In spite of a century long effort, there is as yet no generally accepted classical equation of motion for charged particles, as well as no pertinent experimental data, cf.^[8]

Lorentz force

Main article: Lorentz force

The electromagnetic field exerts the following force (often called the Lorentz force) on charged particles:

$\mathbf{F} = q\mathbf{E} + q\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}$

where all boldfaced quantities are vectors: F is the force that a charge q experiences, E is the electric field at the location of the charge, v is the velocity of the charge, B is the magnetic field at the location of the charge.

The above equation illustrates that the Lorentz force is the sum of two vectors. One is the cross product of the velocity and magnetic field vectors. Based on the properties of the cross product, this produces a vector that is perpendicular to both the velocity and magnetic field vectors. The other vector is in the same direction as the electric field. The sum of these two vectors is the Lorentz force.

Therefore, in the absence of a magnetic field, the force is in the direction of the electric field, and the magnitude of the force is dependent on the value of the charge and the intensity of the electric field. In the absence of an electric field, the force is perpendicular to the velocity of the particle and the direction of the magnetic field. If both electric and magnetic fields are present, the Lorentz force is the sum of both of these vectors.

The electric field E

Main article: Electric field

The electric field E is defined such that, on a stationary charge:

$\mathbf{F} = q_0 \mathbf{E}$

where q₀ is what is known as a test charge. The size of the charge doesn't really matter, as long as it is small enough not to influence the electric field by its mere presence. What is plain from this definition, though, is that the unit of E is N/C (newtons per coulomb). This unit is equal to V/m (volts per meter), see below.

In electrostatics, where charges are not moving, around a distribution of point charges, the forces determined from Coulomb's law may be summed. The result after dividing by q₀ is:

$\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 } \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{q_i \left( \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_i \right)} {\left| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_i \right|^3}$

where n is the number of charges, q_i is the amount of charge associated with the ith charge, r_i is the position of the ith charge, r is the position where the electric field is being determined, and ε₀ is the electric constant.

If the field is instead produced by a continuous distribution of charge, the summation becomes an integral:

$\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{ 4 \pi \varepsilon_0 } \int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}) \hat{\mathbf{r}}}{r^2} \mathrm{d}V$

where ρ(r) is the charge density as a function of position, $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$ is the unit vector pointing from dV to the point in space where E is being determined, and r is the distance from the point E is being calculated at to the point charge.

Both of the above equations are cumbersome, especially if one wants to determine E as a function of position. A scalar function called the electric potential can help. Electric potential, also called voltage (the units for which are the volt), is defined by the line integral

$\varphi_\mathbf{E} = - \int_C \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf{s} \, ,$

where φ_E is the electric potential, and C is the path over which the integral is being taken.

Unfortunately, this definition has a caveat. From Maxwell's equations, it is clear that ∇ × E is not always zero, and hence the scalar potential alone is insufficient to define the electric field exactly. As a result, one must add a correction factor, which is generally done by subtracting the time derivative of the A vector potential described below. Whenever the charges are quasistatic, however, this condition will be essentially met.

From the definition of charge, one can easily show that the electric potential of a point charge as a function of position is:

$\varphi = \frac{q}{ 4 \pi \varepsilon_0 \left| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_q \right|}$

where q is the point charge's charge, r is the position at which the potential is being determined, and r_q is the position of the point charge. The potential for a general distribution of charge ends up being:

$\varphi = \frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r})}{r}\, \mathrm{d}V$

where ρ(r) is the charge density as a function of position, and r is the distance from the volume element dV.

The scalar φ will add to other potentials as a scalar. This makes it relatively easy to break complex problems down in to simple parts and add their potentials. Taking the definition of φ backwards, we see that the electric field is just the negative gradient (the del operator) of the potential. Or:

$\mathbf{E} = -\nabla \varphi .$

From this formula it is clear that E can be expressed in V/m (volts per meter).

Electromagnetic waves

Main article: Electromagnetic waves

A changing electromagnetic field propagates away from its origin in the form of a wave. These waves travel in vacuum at the speed of light and exist in a wide spectrum of wavelengths. Examples of the dynamic fields of electromagnetic radiation (in order of increasing frequency): radio waves, microwaves, light (infrared, visible light and ultraviolet), x-rays and gamma rays. In the field of particle physics this electromagnetic radiation is the manifestation of the electromagnetic interaction between charged particles.

General field equations

Main articles: Jefimenko's equations and Liénard-Wiechert Potentials

As simple and satisfying as Coulomb's equation may be, it is not entirely correct in the context of classical electromagnetism. Problems arise because changes in charge distributions require a non-zero amount of time to be "felt" elsewhere (required by special relativity).

For the fields of general charge distributions, the retarded potentials can be computed and differentiated accordingly to yield Jefimenko's Equations.

Retarded potentials can also be derived for point charges, and the equations are known as the Liénard-Wiechert potentials. The scalar potential is:

$\varphi = \frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{\left| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_q(t_{ret}) \right|-\frac{\mathbf{v}_q(t_{ret})}{c} \cdot (\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_q(t_{ret}))}$

where q is the point charge's charge and r is the position. r_q and v_q are the position and velocity of the charge, respectively, as a function of retarded time. The vector potential is similar:

$\mathbf{A} = \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi} \frac{q\mathbf{v}_q(t_{ret})}{\left| \mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_q(t_{ret}) \right|-\frac{\mathbf{v}_q(t_{ret})}{c} \cdot (\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}_q(t_{ret}))}$

These can then be differentiated accordingly to obtain the complete field equations for a moving point particle.

Models

A branch of classical electromagnetisms such as optics, electrical and electronic engineering consist of a collection of relevant mathematical models of different degree of simplification and idealization to enhance our understanding of the specific electrodynamics phenomena, cf.^[9] An electrodynamics phenomenon is determined by the particular fields, specific densities of electric charges and currents, and the particular transmission medium. Since there are infinitely many of them, in modeling there is a need for some typical, representative

(a) electrical charges and currents, e.g. moving pointlike charges and electric and magnetic dipoles,^[10] electric currents in a conductor etc;

(b) electromagnetic fields, e.g. voltages, the Liénard-Wiechert potentials, the monochromatic plane waves , optical rays; radio waves, microwaves, infrared radiation, visible light, ultraviolet radiation, X-rays , gamma rays etc;

(c) transmission media, e.g. electronic components, antennas, electromagnetic waveguides, flat mirrors, mirrors with curved surfaces convex lenses, concave lenses; resistors, inductors, capacitors, switches; wires, electric and optical cables, transmission lines, integrated circuits etc;

which all have only few variable characteristics.

See also

• Quantum electrodynamics
• Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory

References

1. ^ Feynman, R.P., R.B. Leighton, and M. Sands, 1965, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. II: the Electromagnetic Field, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
2. ^ Panofsky, W.K., and M. Phillips, 1969, Classical Electricity and Magnetism, 2nd edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
3. ^ ^{a b} Jackson, John D. (1998). Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-30932-X. 
4. ^ Pauli, W., 1958, Theory of Relativity, Pergamon, London
5. ^ Whittaker, E.T., 1960, History of the Theories of the Aether and Electricity, Harper Torchbooks, New York.
6. ^ Pais, A., 1983, »Subtle is the Lord...«; the Science and Life of Albert Einstein, Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. ^ Ribarič, M., and L. Šušteršič, 1990, Conservation Laws and Open Questions of Classical Electrodynamics, World Scientific, Singapore
8. ^ M. Ribarič and L. Šušteršič, Improvement on the Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac equation, arxiv:1011.1805
9. ^ Peierls, Rudolf. Model-making in physics, Contemporary Physics, Volume 21 (1), January 1980, 3-17.
10. ^ [ Ribarič M. and Šušteršič L. Moving pointlike charges and electric and magnetic dipoles, AM.J.Phys.60(6),June 1992 ]

External links

• Electromagnetic Field Theory by Bo Thidé