# Lorentz force

Lorentz force  Trajectory of a particle with a positive or negative charge q under the influence of a magnetic field B, which is directed perpendicularly out of the screen.  Beam of electrons moving in a circle, due to the presence of a magnetic field. Purple light is emitted along the electron path, due to the electrons colliding with gas molecules in the bulb.

In physics, the Lorentz force is the force on a point charge due to electromagnetic fields. It is given by the following equation in terms of the electric and magnetic fields: $\mathbf{F} = q[\mathbf{E} + (\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B})],$

where

F is the force (in newtons)
E is the electric field (in volts per metre)
B is the magnetic field (in teslas)
q is the electric charge of the particle (in coulombs)
v is the instantaneous velocity of the particle (in metres per second)
× is the vector cross product operator

All the quantities written in boldface are vectors.

The Lorentz force law has a close relationship with Faraday's law of induction.

A positively charged particle will be accelerated in the same linear orientation as the E field, but will curve perpendicularly to both the instantaneous velocity vector v and the B field according to the right-hand rule (in detail, if the thumb of the right hand points along v and the index finger along B, then the middle finger points along F).

The term qE is called the electric force, while the term qv × B is called the magnetic force. According to some definitions, the term "Lorentz force" refers specifically to the formula for the magnetic force, with the total electromagnetic force (including the electric force) given some other (nonstandard) name. This article will not follow this nomenclature: In what follows, the term "Lorentz force" will refer only to the expression for the total force.

The magnetic force component of the Lorentz force manifests itself as the force that acts on a current-carrying wire in a magnetic field. In that context, it is also called the Laplace force.

## History

Early attempts to quantitatively describe the electromagnetic force were made in the mid-18th century. It was proposed that the force on magnetic poles, by Johann Tobias Mayer and others in 1760, and electrically charged objects, by Henry Cavendish in 1762, obeyed an inverse-square law. However, in both cases the experimental proof was neither complete nor conclusive. It was not until 1784 when Charles-Augustin de Coulomb, using a torsion balance, was able to definitively show through experiment that this was true. Soon after the discovery in 1820 by H. C. Ørsted that a magnetic needle is acted on by a voltaic current, André-Marie Ampère that same year was able to devise through experimentation the formula for the angular dependence of the force between two current elements. In all these descriptions, the force was always given in terms of the properties of the objects involved and the distances between them rather than in terms of electric and magnetic fields.

The modern concept of electric and magnetic fields first arose in the theories of Michael Faraday, particularly his idea of lines of force, later to be given full mathematical description by Lord Kelvin and James Clerk Maxwell. From a modern perspective it is possible to identify in Maxwell's 1865 formulation of his field equations a form of the Lorentz force equation in relation to electric currents, however, in the time of Maxwell it was not evident how his equations related to the forces on moving charged objects. J. J. Thomson was the first to attempt to derive from Maxwell's field equations the electromagnetic forces on a moving charged object in terms of the object's properties and external fields. Interested in determining the electromagnetic behavior of the charged particles in cathode rays, Thomson published a paper in 1881 wherein he gave the force on the particles due to an external magnetic field as $\tfrac{1}{2}q\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}$. Thomson was able to arrive at the correct basic form of the formula, but, because of some miscalculations and an incomplete description of the displacement current, included an incorrect scale-factor of a half in front of the formula. It was Oliver Heaviside, who had invented the modern vector notation and applied them to Maxwell's field equations, that in 1885 and 1889 fixed the mistakes of Thomson's derivation and arrived at the correct form of the magnetic force on a moving charged object. Finally, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz derived the modern day form of the formula for the electromagnetic force which includes the contributions to the total force from both the electric and the magnetic fields. Lorentz began by abandoning the Maxwellian descriptions of the ether and conduction. Instead, Lorentz made a distinction between matter and the luminiferous aether and sought to apply the Maxwell equations at a microscopic scale. Using the Heaviside's version of the Maxwell equations for a stationary ether and applying Lagrangian mechanics, Lorentz arrived at the correct and complete form of the force law that now bears his name.

## Trajectories of particles in a Lorentz force  Charged particle drifts in a homogeneous magnetic field. (A) No disturbing force (B) With an electric field, E (C) With an independent force, F (e.g. gravity) (D) In an inhomogeneous magnetic field, grad H

In many cases of practical interest, the motion in a magnetic field of an electrically charged particle (such as an electron or ion in a plasma) can be treated as the superposition of a relatively fast circular motion around a point called the guiding center and a relatively slow drift of this point. The drift speeds may differ for various species depending on their charge states, masses, or temperatures, possibly resulting in electric currents or chemical separation.

## Significance of the Lorentz force

While the modern Maxwell's equations describe how electrically charged particles and currents or moving charged particles give rise to electric and magnetic fields, the Lorentz force law completes that picture by describing the force acting on a moving point charge q in the presence of electromagnetic fields. The Lorentz force law describes the effect of E and B upon a point charge, but such electromagnetic forces are not the entire picture. Charged particles are possibly coupled to other forces, notably gravity and nuclear forces. Thus, Maxwell's equations do not stand separate from other physical laws, but are coupled to them via the charge and current densities. The response of a point charge to the Lorentz law is one aspect; the generation of E and B by currents and charges is another.

In real materials the Lorentz force is inadequate to describe the behavior of charged particles, both in principle and as a matter of computation. The charged particles in a material medium both respond to the E and B fields and generate these fields. Complex transport equations must be solved to determine the time and spatial response of charges, for example, the Boltzmann equation or the Fokker–Planck equation or the Navier–Stokes equations. For example, see magnetohydrodynamics, fluid dynamics, electrohydrodynamics, superconductivity, stellar evolution. An entire physical apparatus for dealing with these matters has developed. See for example, Green–Kubo relations and Green's function (many-body theory).

## Lorentz force law as the definition of E and B

In many textbook treatments of classical electromagnetism, the Lorentz Force Law is used as the definition of the electric and magnetic fields E and B. To be specific, the Lorentz Force is understood to be the following empirical statement:

The electromagnetic force on a test charge at a given point and time is a certain function of its charge and velocity, which can be parameterized by exactly two vectors E and B, in the functional form: $\mathbf{F}=q[\mathbf{E}+(\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B})].$

If this empirical statement is valid (and, of course, countless experiments have shown that it is), then two vector fields E and B are thereby defined throughout space and time, and these are called the "electric field" and "magnetic field".

Note that the fields are defined everywhere in space and time, regardless of whether or not a charge is present to experience the force. In particular, the fields are defined with respect to what force a test charge would feel, if it were hypothetically placed there.

Note also that as a definition of E and B, the Lorentz force is only a definition in principle because a real particle (as opposed to the hypothetical "test charge" of infinitesimally-small mass and charge) would generate its own finite E and B fields, which would alter the electromagnetic force that it experiences. In addition, if the charge experiences acceleration, for example, if forced into a curved trajectory by some external agency, it emits radiation that causes braking of its motion. See, for example, Bremsstrahlung and synchrotron light. These effects occur through both a direct effect (called the radiation reaction force) and indirectly (by affecting the motion of nearby charges and currents).

Moreover, the electromagnetic force is not in general the same as the net force, due to gravity, electroweak and other forces, and any extra forces would have to be taken into account in a real measurement.

## Lorentz force and Faraday's law of induction

Given a loop of wire in a magnetic field, Faraday's law of induction states: $\mathcal{E} = -\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt}$

where: $\Phi_B \$ is the magnetic flux through the loop, $\mathcal{E}$ is the electromotive force (EMF) experienced,
t is time
The sign of the EMF is determined by Lenz's law.

Note that this is valid for not only a stationary wire but also for a moving wire. From the Faraday Law (that is valid for a moving wire, for instance in a motor) and the Maxwell Equations, the Lorentz Force can be deduced. The reverse is also true, the Lorentz force and the Maxwell Equations can be used to derive the Faraday Law.

Let $\part\mathbf{\Sigma}(t)$ be the moving wire, moving together without rotation and with constant velocity $\mathbf{v}$ and $\mathbf{\Sigma}(t)$ be the internal surface of the wire. The EMF around the closed path $\part\mathbf{\Sigma}(t)$ is given by: $\mathcal{E} =\oint_{\part \Sigma (t)} d \boldsymbol{\ell} \cdot \mathbf{F} / q$

where d is an element of the curve $\part\mathbf{\Sigma}(t)$. The flux ΦB in Faraday's law of induction can be expressed explicitly as: $\Phi_B = \iint_{\Sigma(t)} d \boldsymbol{A} \cdot \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r}, t)$

where $\mathbf{\Sigma}(t)$ is a surface bounded by the closed contour $\part\mathbf{\Sigma}(t)$
E is the electric field,
d is an infinitesimal vector element of the contour $\part\mathbf{\Sigma}(t)$,
v is the velocity of the infinitesimal contour element d,
B is the magnetic field.
dA is an infinitesimal vector element of surface $\part\mathbf{\Sigma}(t)$ , whose magnitude is the area of an infinitesimal patch of surface, and whose direction is orthogonal to that surface patch.
Both d and dA have a sign ambiguity; to get the correct sign, the right-hand rule is used, as explained in the article Kelvin-Stokes theorem.

The above result can be compared with the version of Faraday's law of induction that appears in the modern Maxwell's equations, called here the Maxwell-Faraday equation: $\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} \ .$

The Maxwell-Faraday equation also can be written in an integral form using the Kelvin-Stokes theorem:.

So we have, the Maxwell Faraday equation: $\oint_{\partial \Sigma(t)}d \boldsymbol{\ell} \cdot \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},\ t) = - \ \iint_{\Sigma(t)} d \boldsymbol {A} \cdot {{ d \,\mathbf {B}(\mathbf{r},\ t)} \over dt }$

and the Faraday Law, $\oint_{\partial \Sigma(t)}d \boldsymbol{\ell} \cdot \mathbf{F}/q(\mathbf{r},\ t) = - \frac{d}{dt} \iint_{\Sigma(t)} d \boldsymbol {A} \cdot \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},\ t)$

The two are equivalent if the wire is not moving. Using the Leibniz integral rule and that div B = 0, results in, $\oint_{\partial \Sigma(t)} d \boldsymbol{\ell} \cdot \mathbf{F}/q(\mathbf{r}, t) = - \iint_{\Sigma(t)} d \boldsymbol{A} \cdot \frac{d}{dt} \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r}, t) + \oint_{\partial \Sigma(t)} \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B} d \boldsymbol{\ell}$

and using the Maxwell Faraday equation, $\oint_{\partial \Sigma(t)} d \boldsymbol{\ell} \cdot \mathbf{F}/q(\mathbf{r},\ t) = \oint_{\partial \Sigma(t)} d \boldsymbol{\ell} \cdot \mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},\ t) + \oint_{\partial \Sigma(t)} \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},\ t) d \boldsymbol{\ell}$

since this is valid for any wire position it implies that, $\mathbf{F}= q\,\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r},\ t) + q\,\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r},\ t)$

Faraday's law of induction holds whether the loop of wire is rigid and stationary, or in motion or in process of deformation, and it holds whether the magnetic field is constant in time or changing. However, there are cases where Faraday's law is either inadequate or difficult to use, and application of the underlying Lorentz force law is necessary. See inapplicability of Faraday's law.

If the magnetic field is fixed in time and the conducting loop moves through the field, the flux magnetic flux ΦB linking the loop can change in several ways. For example, if the B-field varies with position, and the loop moves to a location with different B-field, ΦB will change. Alternatively, if the loop changes orientation with respect to the B-field, the B•dA differential element will change because of the different angle between B and dA, also changing ΦB. As a third example, if a portion of the circuit is swept through a uniform, time-independent B-field, and another portion of the circuit is held stationary, the flux linking the entire closed circuit can change due to the shift in relative position of the circuit's component parts with time (surface $\part\mathbf{\Sigma}(t)$ time-dependent). In all three cases, Faraday's law of induction then predicts the EMF generated by the change in ΦB.

Note that the Maxwell Faraday's equation implies that the Electric Field (E) is non conservative when the Magnetic Field (B) varies in time, and is not expressible as the gradient of a scalar field, and not subject to the gradient theorem since its rotational is not zero.

See Landau, L. D., Lifshit︠s︡, E. M., & Pitaevskiĭ, L. P. (1984). Electrodynamics of continuous media; Volume 8 Course of Theoretical Physics (Second ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. p. §63 (§49 pp. 205–207 in 1960 edition). ISBN 0750626348.  M N O Sadiku (2007). Elements of elctromagnetics (Fourth ed.). NY/Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 391. ISBN 0-19-530048-3.

## Lorentz force in terms of potentials

If the scalar potential and vector potential replace E and B (see Helmholtz decomposition), the force becomes: $\mathbf{F} = q(-\nabla \phi- \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial \mathbf{t}}+\mathbf{v}\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{A}))$

or, equivalently (making use of the fact that v is a constant; see triple product), $\mathbf{F} = q(-\nabla \phi- \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial \mathbf{t}}+ \nabla(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{A})-(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{A} )$

where

A is the magnetic vector potential
ϕ is the electrostatic potential
The symbols $\nabla,(\nabla\times),(\nabla\cdot)$ denote gradient, curl, and divergence, respectively.

The potentials are related to E and B by $\mathbf{E} = - \nabla \phi - \frac { \partial \mathbf{A} } { \partial t }$ $\mathbf{B} = \nabla \times \mathbf{A}$

## Lorentz force in cgs units

The above-mentioned formulae use SI units which are the most common among experimentalists, technicians, and engineers. In cgs-Gaussian units, which are somewhat more common among theoretical physicists, one has instead $\mathbf{F} = q_{cgs} \cdot (\mathbf{E}_{cgs} + \frac{\mathbf{v}}{c} \times \mathbf{B}_{cgs}).$

where c is the speed of light. Although this equation looks slightly different, it is completely equivalent, since one has the following relations: $q_{cgs}=\frac{q_{SI}}{\sqrt{4\pi \epsilon_0}}$, $\mathbf E_{cgs} =\sqrt{4\pi\epsilon_0}\,\mathbf E_{SI}$, and $\mathbf B_{cgs} ={\sqrt{4\pi /\mu_0}}\,{\mathbf B_{SI}}$

where ε0 and μ0 are the vacuum permittivity and vacuum permeability, respectively. In practice, unfortunately, the subscripts "cgs" and "SI" are always omitted, and the unit system has to be assessed from context.

## Covariant form of the Lorentz force

Newton's law of motion can be written in covariant form in terms of the field strength tensor. $\frac{d p^\alpha}{d \tau} = q U_\beta F^{\alpha \beta}$
where
τ is c times the proper time of the particle,
q is the charge,
U is the covariant 4-velocity of the particle, defined as: $U_\beta = \left(U_0, U_1, U_2, U_3 \right) = \gamma \left(-c, u_x, u_y, u_z \right) \,$ under the metric signature (-1,1,1,1)
with γ = Lorentz factor defined above, and F is the contravariant electromagnetic tensor written in terms of fields as: $F^{\alpha \beta} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & E_x/c & E_y/c & E_z/c \\ -E_x/c & 0 & B_z & -B_y \\ -E_y/c & -B_z & 0 & B_x \\ -E_z/c & B_y & -B_x & 0 \end{bmatrix}$.

The fields are transformed to a frame moving with constant relative velocity by: $\acute{F}^{\mu \nu} = {\Lambda^{\mu}}_{\alpha} {\Lambda^{\nu}}_{\beta} F^{\alpha \beta} ,$

where ${\Lambda^{\mu}}_{\alpha}$ is a Lorentz transformation. Alternatively, using the four vector: $A^{\alpha} = \left( \phi / c,\ A_x,\ A_y,\ A_z \right) \ ,$

related to the electric and magnetic fields by: $\mathbf{E = -\nabla} \phi - \partial_t \mathbf{A}$ $\mathbf{B = \nabla \times A } \ ,$

the field tensor becomes: $F^{\alpha \beta} = \frac {\partial A^{\beta}}{\partial x_{\alpha}} - \frac {\partial A^{\alpha}}{\partial x_{\beta}} \ ,$

where: $x_{\alpha} = \left( -ct,\ x,\ y,\ z \right) \ .$

### Translation to vector notation

The α = 1 component (x-component) of the force is $\frac{d p^1}{d \tau} = q U_\beta F^{1 \beta} = q\left(U_0 F^{10} + U_1 F^{11} + U_2 F^{12} + U_3 F^{13} \right) .\,$

Here, τ is the proper time of the particle. Substituting the components of the covariant electromagnetic tensor F yields $\frac{d p^1}{d \tau} = q \left(U_0 \left(\frac{-E_x}{c} \right) + U_2 (B_z) + U_3 (-B_y) \right) \,$

Using the components of covariant four-velocity yields $\frac{d p^1}{d \tau} = q \gamma \left(-c \left(\frac{-E_x}{c} \right) + u_y B_z + u_z (-B_y) \right) \,$ $\frac{d p^1}{d \tau} = q \gamma \left(E_x + u_y B_z - u_z B_y \right) \,$ $\frac{d p^1}{d \tau} = q \gamma \left( E_x + \left[ \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B} \right]_x \right) .\,$

The calculation of the α = 2 or α = 3 is similar yielding $\frac{d \mathbf{p} }{d \tau} = q \gamma\left( \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B} \right)\ ,$

or, in terms of the vector and scalar potentials A and φ, $\frac{d \mathbf{p} }{d \tau} = q \gamma ( - \nabla \phi - \frac { \partial \mathbf{A} } { \partial t } + \mathbf{v} \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{A})) \ ,$

which are the relativistic forms of Newton's law of motion when the Lorentz force is the only force present.

## Force on a current-carrying wire  Right hand rule for a current-carrying wire in a magnetic field B

When a wire carrying an electrical current is placed in a magnetic field, each of the moving charges, which comprise the current, experiences the Lorentz force, and together they can create a macroscopic force on the wire (sometimes called the Laplace force). By combining the Lorentz force law above with the definition of electrical current, the following equation results, in the case of a straight, stationary wire: $\mathbf{F} = I \mathbf{L} \times \mathbf{B} \,$

where

F = Force, measured in newtons
I = current in wire, measured in amperes
B = magnetic field vector, measured in teslas $\times$ = vector cross product
L = a vector, whose magnitude is the length of wire (measured in metres), and whose direction is along the wire, aligned with the direction of conventional current flow.

Alternatively, some authors write $\mathbf{F} = L \mathbf{I} \times \mathbf{B}$

where the vector direction is now associated with the current variable, instead of the length variable. The two forms are equivalent.

If the wire is not straight but curved, the force on it can be computed by applying this formula to each infinitesimal segment of wire d, then adding up all these forces via integration. Formally, the net force on a stationary, rigid wire carrying a current I is $\mathbf{F} = I\int d\boldsymbol{\ell}\times \mathbf{B}$

(This is the net force. In addition, there will usually be torque, plus other effects if the wire is not perfectly rigid.)

One application of this is Ampère's force law, which describes how two current-carrying wires can attract or repel each other, since each experiences a Lorentz force from the other's magnetic field. For more information, see the article: Ampère's force law.

## EMF

The magnetic force (q v × B) component of the Lorentz force is responsible for motional electromotive force (or motional EMF), the phenomenon underlying many electrical generators. When a conductor is moved through a magnetic field, the magnetic force tries to push electrons through the wire, and this creates the EMF. The term "motional EMF" is applied to this phenomenon, since the EMF is due to the motion of the wire.

In other electrical generators, the magnets move, while the conductors do not. In this case, the EMF is due to the electric force (qE) term in the Lorentz Force equation. The electric field in question is created by the changing magnetic field, resulting in an induced EMF, as described by the Maxwell-Faraday equation (one of the four modern Maxwell's equations).

Both of these EMF's, despite their different origins, can be described by the same equation, namely, the EMF is the rate of change of magnetic flux through the wire. (This is Faraday's law of induction, see above.) Einstein's theory of special relativity was partially motivated by the desire to better understand this link between the two effects. In fact, the electric and magnetic fields are different faces of the same electromagnetic field, and in moving from one inertial frame to another, the solenoidal vector field portion of the E-field can change in whole or in part to a B-field or vice versa.

## General references

The numbered references refer in part to the list immediately below.

• Feynman, Richard Phillips; Leighton, Robert B.; Sands, Matthew L. (2006). The Feynman lectures on physics (3 vol.). Pearson / Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-8053-9047-2 : volume 2.
• Griffiths, David J. (1999). Introduction to electrodynamics (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, [NJ.]: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-805326-X
• Jackson, John David (1999). Classical electrodynamics (3rd ed.). New York, [NY.]: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-30932-X
• Serway, Raymond A.; Jewett, John W., Jr. (2004). Physics for scientists and engineers, with modern physics. Belmont, [CA.]: Thomson Brooks/Cole. ISBN 0-534-40846-X
• Srednicki, Mark A. (2007). Quantum field theory. Cambridge, [England] ; New York [NY.]: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86449-7

## Numbered footnotes and references

1. ^ a b See Jackson page 2. The book lists the four modern Maxwell's equations, and then states, "Also essential for consideration of charged particle motion is the Lorentz force equation, F = q ( E+ v × B ), which gives the force acting on a point charge q in the presence of electromagnetic fields."
2. ^ See Griffiths page 204.
3. ^ For example, see the website of the "Lorentz Institute": , or Griffiths.
4. ^ Meyer, Herbert W. (1972). A History of Electricity and Magnetism. Norwalk, CT: Burndy Library. pp. 30–31. ISBN 026213070X.
5. ^ Verschuur, Gerrit L. (1993). Hidden Attraction : The History And Mystery Of Magnetism. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 78–79. ISBN 0195064887.
6. ^ Darrigol, Olivier (2000). Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein. Oxford, [England]: Oxford University Press. pp. 9, 25. ISBN 0-198-50593-0
7. ^ Verschuur, Gerrit L. (1993). Hidden Attraction : The History And Mystery Of Magnetism. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 76. ISBN 0195064887.
8. ^ Darrigol, Olivier (2000). Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein. Oxford, [England]: Oxford University Press. pp. 126–131, 139–144. ISBN 0-198-50593-0
9. ^ Huray, Paul G. (2009). Maxwell's Equations. Wiley-IEEE. p. 22. ISBN 0470542764.
10. ^ Darrigol, Olivier (2000). Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein. Oxford, [England]: Oxford University Press. pp. 200, 429–430. ISBN 0-198-50593-0
11. ^ Darrigol, Olivier (2000). Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein. Oxford, [England]: Oxford University Press. p. 327. ISBN 0-198-50593-0
12. ^ Whittaker, E. T. (1910). A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity: From the Age of Descartes to the Close of the Nineteenth Century. Longmans, Green and Co.. pp. 420–423. ISBN 1143012089.
13. ^ See Griffiths page 326, which states that Maxwell's equations, "together with the [Lorentz] force law...summarize the entire theoretical content of classical electrodynamics".
14. ^ See, for example, Jackson p777-8.
15. ^ Landau, L. D., Lifshit︠s︡, E. M., & Pitaevskiĭ, L. P. (1984). Electrodynamics of continuous media; Volume 8 Course of Theoretical Physics (Second ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. p. §63 (§49 pp. 205–207 in 1960 edition). ISBN 0750626348.
16. ^ Roger F Harrington (2003). Introduction to electromagnetic engineering. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. p. 56. ISBN 0486432416.
17. ^ DJ Griffiths (1999). Introduction to electrodynamics. Saddle River NJ: Pearson/Addison-Wesley. p. 541. ISBN 0-13-805326-X.
18. ^ a b See Griffiths pages 301–3.
19. ^ Tai L. Chow (2006). Electromagnetic theory. Sudbury MA: Jones and Bartlett. p. 395. ISBN 0-7637-3827-1.

## Applications

The Lorentz force occurs in many devices, including:

In its manifestation as the Laplace force on an electric current in a conductor, this force occurs in many devices including:

## See also

 Hall effect Electromagnetism Gravitomagnetism Ampère's force law Hendrik Lorentz Maxwell's equations Formulation of Maxwell's equations in special relativity

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

### Look at other dictionaries:

• Lorentz force — Elect. the force on a charged particle moving through a region containing both electric and magnetic fields. [1960 65; named after H. A. LORENTZ] * * * ▪ physics       the force exerted on a charged particle q moving with velocity v through an… …   Universalium

• Lorentz force — Lorenco jėga statusas T sritis Standartizacija ir metrologija apibrėžtis Jėga, kuria elektromagnetinis laukas veikia jame judančią elektringąją dalelę arba kūną. atitikmenys: angl. Lorentz force vok. Lorentz Kraft, f rus. лоренцова сила, f; сила… …   Penkiakalbis aiškinamasis metrologijos terminų žodynas

• Lorentz force — Lorenco jėga statusas T sritis fizika atitikmenys: angl. Lorentz force vok. Lorentzsche Kraft, f rus. сила Лоренца, f pranc. force de Lorentz, f …   Fizikos terminų žodynas

• Lorentz force — noun the force experienced by a point charge moving along a wire that is in a magnetic field; the force is at right angles to both the current and the magnetic field the Lorentz force can be used to suspend a current carrying object between two… …   Useful english dictionary

• Lorentz force — noun Physics the force exerted by a magnetic field on a moving electric charge. Origin 1930s: named after the Dutch theoretical physicist Hendrik Antoon Lorentz …   English new terms dictionary

• Lorentz force — /ˈlɒrənts fɔs/ (say loruhnts faws) noun the sum of the electric and magnetic forces on a moving electric charge. {from Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, 1853–1928, Dutch physicist} …   Australian-English dictionary

• Lorentz force — noun the force exerted on a charged particle in an electromagnetic field …   Wiktionary

• Lorentz force density — Lorenco jėgos tankis statusas T sritis fizika atitikmenys: angl. Lorentz force density vok. Lorentzsche Kraftdichte, f rus. плотность силы Лорентца, f pranc. densité de force de Lorentz, f …   Fizikos terminų žodynas

• Abraham-Lorentz force — In the physics of electromagnetism, the Abraham Lorentz force is the recoil force on an accelerating charged particle caused by the particle emitting electromagnetic radiation. It is also called the radiation reaction force. The formula for the… …   Wikipedia

• Lorentz — may refer to:In literature:* Friedrich Lorentz, author of works on the Pomeranian language * Pare Lorentz (1905 1992), American author and film directorIn physics:* Hendrik Lorentz (1853–1928), Dutch physicist and Nobel Prize winner * Lorentz… …   Wikipedia

### Share the article and excerpts

##### Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”