- William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin
box_width = 300px
name = Lord Kelvin
image_width = 300px
caption = William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin (1824-1907)
birth_date = birth date|1824|6|26|df=y
Belfast, Co. Antrim, Northern Ireland
death_date = death date and age|1907|12|17|1824|6|26|df=yThe Timetables of Science|pages=411]
Largs, Ayrshire, Scotland
Cambridge, England Glasgow, Scotland
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
University of Glasgow
Glasgow University Peterhouse, Cambridge
William Edward Ayrton William Murray Morrison
Joule-Thomson effect Mirror galvanometer Siphon recorder Kelvin material Kelvin water dropper Kelvin wave Kelvin-Helmholtz instability Kelvin-Helmholtz mechanism Kelvin-Helmholtz luminosity Kelvin transform Kelvin's circulation theorem Kelvin bridge Kelvin water dropper Kelvin sensing Kelvin equation Magnetoresistance Four-terminal sensingnowrap|Coining the term 'kinetic energy'
John Pringle Nichol Humphry Davy Julius Robert von Mayer
influenced = Andrew Gray
Smith's Prize Royal Medal Copley Medal
footnotes = It is believed the "PNP" in his signature stands for "Professor of Natural Philosophy." Note that Kelvin also wrote under the pseudonym "P. Q. R."
William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin (or Lord Kelvin), OM, GCVO, PC, PRS, FRSE, (26 June 1824 – 17 December 1907) was an Irish mathematical physicist and
engineer. At Glasgow University he did important work in the mathematical analysis of electricityand thermodynamics, and did much to unify the emerging discipline of physicsin its modern form. He is widely known for developing the Kelvinscale of absolute temperature measurement. He was given the title BaronKelvin in honour of his achievements and is therefore often described as LordKelvin. The title refers to the River Kelvin, which flows past his university in Glasgow, Scotland.
He also had a later career as an
electric telegraphengineer and inventor, a career that propelled him into the public eye and ensured his wealth, fame and honour.
Early life and work
William Thomson's father, Dr. James Thomson, was a teacher of mathematics and engineering at
Royal Belfast Academical Institutionand the son of a farmer. James Thomson married Margaret Gardner in 1817 and, of their children, four boys and two girls survived infancy. Margaret Thomson died in 1830 when William was only six years old. [http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Thomson_James.html Biography of William Thomson's father]
William and his elder brother James were tutored at home by their father while the younger boys were tutored by their elder sisters. James was intended to benefit from the major share of his father's encouragement, affection and financial support and was prepared for a fashionable career in
engineering. However, James was a sickly youth and proved unsuited to a sequence of failed apprenticeships.
In 1832, his father was appointed professor of mathematics at
Glasgowand the family relocated there in October 1833. The Thomson children were introduced to a broader cosmopolitan experience than their father's rural upbringing, spending the summer of 1839 in Londonand, the boys, being tutored in French in Paris. The summer of 1840 was spent in Germanyand the Netherlands. Language study was given a high priority.
Thomson had heart problems and nearly died when he was 9 years old. He attended the
Royal Belfast Academical Institution, where his father was a professor in the university department, before beginning study at Glasgow University in 1834 at the age of 10, not out of any precociousness; the University provided many of the facilities of an elementary school for abler pupils and this was a typical starting age. In 1839, John Pringle Nichol, the professor of astronomy, took the chair of natural philosophy. Nichol updated the curriculum, introducing the new mathematical works of Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier. The mathematical treatment much impressed Thomson.
In the academic year 1839-1840, Thomson won the class prize in
astronomyfor his "Essay on the figure of the Earth" which showed an early facility for mathematical analysis and creativity. Throughout his life, he would work on the problems raised in the essay as a coping strategy at times of personal stress.
Thomson became intrigued with Fourier's "Théorie analytique de la chaleur" and committed himself to study the "Continental" mathematics resisted by a British establishment still working in the shadow of Sir
Isaac Newton. Unsurprisingly, Fourier's work had been attacked by domestic mathematicians, Philip Kellandauthoring a critical book. The book motivated Thomson to write his first published scientific paper[P.Q.R (1841) "On Fourier's expansions of functions in trigonometric series" "Cambridge Mathematical Journal" 2, 258-259] under the pseudonym"P.Q.R.", defending Fourier, and submitted to the "Cambridge Mathematical Journal" by his father. A second P.Q.R paper followed almost immediately. [P.Q.R (1841) "Note on a passage in Fourier's 'Heat'" "Cambridge Mathematical Journal" 3, 25-27]
While holidaying with his family in
Lamlashin 1841, he wrote a third, more substantial, P.Q.R. paper "On the uniform motion of heat in homogeneous solid bodies, and its connection with the mathematical theory of electricity". [P.Q.R (1842) "On the uniform motion of heat and its connection with the mathematical theory of electricity" "Cambridge Mathematical Journal" 3, 71-84] In the paper he made remarkable connections between the mathematical theories of heat conductionand electrostatics, an analogythat James Clerk Maxwellwas ultimately to describe as one of the most valuable "science-forming ideas." [cite book| author=Niven, W.D. (ed.) | title=The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 2 vols | location=New York | publisher=Dover | year=1965 | id= , Vol.2, "p.301"]
William's father was able to make a generous provision for his favourite son's education and, in 1841, installed him, with extensive letters of introduction and ample accommodation, at
Peterhouse, Cambridge. In 1845 Thomson graduated as Second Wrangler. However, he won a Smith's Prize, sometimes regarded as a better test of originality than the tripos. Robert Leslie Ellis, one of the examiners, is said to have declared to another examiner "You and I are just about fit to mend his pens." [Thompson (1910) vol. 1, "p."98]
While at Cambridge, Thomson was active in sports, athletics and
sculling, winning the Colquhoun Sculls in 1843. [ [http://www.pbcf.org/history/timeline.php Peterhouse Boat Club Fund - Timeline] ] He also took a lively interest in the classics, music, and literature; but the real love of his intellectual life was the pursuit of science. The study of mathematics, physics, and in particular, of electricity, had captivated his imagination.
In 1845 he gave the first mathematical development of Faraday's idea that electric induction takes place through an intervening medium, or "dielectric", and not by some incomprehensible "action at a distance". He also devised a hypothesis of electrical images, which became a powerful agent in solving problems of electrostatics, or the science which deals with the forces of electricity at rest. It was partly in response to his encouragement that Faraday undertook the research in September of 1845 that led to the discovery of the
Faraday effect, which established that light and magnetic (and thus electric) phenomena were related.
He was elected a fellow of St Peter's in June 1845.cite news|first=Mark|last=McCartney|title=William Thomson: king of Victorian physics|work=
Physics World|url=http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/16484|date=1 December 2002|accessdate=2008-07-16] On gaining the fellowship, he spent some time in the laboratory of the celebrated Henri Victor Regnault, at Paris; but in 1846 he was appointed to the chair of natural philosophy in the University of Glasgow. At twenty-two he found himself wearing the gown of a learned professor in one of the oldest Universities in the country, and lecturing to the class of which he was a freshman but a few years before.
By 1847, Thomson had already gained a reputation as a precocious and maverick scientist when he attended the
British Association for the Advancement of Scienceannual meeting in Oxford. At that meeting, he heard James Prescott Joulemaking yet another of his, so far, ineffective attempts to discredit the caloric theoryof heatand the theory of the heat enginebuilt upon it by Sadi Carnot and Émile Clapeyron. Joule argued for the mutual convertibility of heat and mechanical workand for their mechanical equivalence.
Thomson was intrigued but skeptical. Though he felt that Joule's results demanded theoretical explanation, he retreated into an even deeper commitment to the Carnot-Clapeyron school. He predicted that the
melting pointof icemust fall with pressure, otherwise its expansion on freezing could be exploited in a "perpetuum mobile". Experimental confirmation in his laboratory did much to bolster his beliefs.
In 1848, he extended the Carnot-Clapeyron theory still further through his dissatisfaction that the
gas thermometerprovided only an operational definitionof temperature. He proposed an " absolute temperaturescale" [Chang (2004), Ch.4] in which "a unit of heat descending from a body A at the temperature "T"° of this scale, to a body B at the temperature ("T"-1)°, would give out the same mechanical effect " [work] ", whatever be the number" T"." Such a scale would be "quite independent of the physical properties of any specific substance." [Thomson, W. (1848) "On an absolute thermometric scale founded on Carnot's theory of the motive power of heat, and calculated from Regnault's observations" "Math. and Phys. Papers" vol. 1, "pp"100-106] By employing such a "waterfall", Thomson postulated that a point would be reached at which no further heat (caloric) could be transferred, the point of " absolute zero" about which Guillaume Amontonshad speculated in 1702. Thomson used data published by Regnault to calibrate his scale against established measurements.
In his publication, Thomson wrote:
- But a footnote signalled his first doubts about the caloric theory, referring to Joule's "very remarkable discoveries". Surprisingly, Thomson did not send Joule a copy of his paper but when Joule eventually read it he wrote to Thomson on 6 October, claiming that his studies had demonstrated conversion of heat into work but that he was planning further experiments. Thomson replied on 27 October, revealing that he was planning his own experiments and hoping for a reconciliation of their two views.
Thomson returned to critique Carnot's original publication and read his analysis to the
Royal Society of Edinburghin January 1849, [- (1949) "An account of Carnot's theory of the motive power of heat; with numerical results deduced from Regnault's experiments on steam" "Math. and Phys. Papers" vol.1, "pp"113-1154] still convinced that the theory was fundamentally sound. However, though Thomson conducted no new experiments, over the next two years he became increasingly dissatisfied with Carnot's theory and convinced of Joule's. In February 1851 he sat down to articulate his new thinking. However, he was uncertain of how to frame his theory and the paper went through several drafts before he settled on an attempt to reconcile Carnot and Joule. During his rewriting, he seems to have considered ideas that would subsequently give rise to the second law of thermodynamics. In Carnot's theory, lost heat was "absolutely lost" but Thomson contended that it was "lost to man" irrecoverably; but not lost in the material world". Moreover, his theological beliefs led to speculation about the heat death of the universe.
In final publication, Thomson retreated from a radical departure and declared "the whole theory of the motive power of heat is founded on ... two ... propositions, due respectively to Joule, and to Carnot and Clausius." [Thomson, W. (1851) "On the dynamical theory of heat; with numerical results deduced from Mr. Joule's equivalent of a thermal unit and M. Regnault's observations on steam" "Math. and Phys. Papers" vol.1, "pp"175-183] Thomson went on to state a form of the second law:
In the paper, Thomson supported the theory that heat was a form of motion but admitted that he had been influenced only by the thought of Sir
Humphry Davyand the experiments of Joule and Julius Robert von Mayer, maintaining that experimental demonstration of the conversion of heat into work was still outstanding. [Thomson, W. (1851) "p."183]
As soon as Joule read the paper he wrote to Thomson with his comments and questions. Thus began a fruitful, though largely epistolary, collaboration between the two men, Joule conducting experiments, Thomson analysing the results and suggesting further experiments. The collaboration lasted from 1852 to 1856, its discoveries including the
Joule-Thomson effect, sometimes called the Kelvin-Joule effect, and the published results [Thomson, W. (1856) "On the thermal effects of fluids in motion" "Math. and Phys. Papers" vol.1, "pp"333-455] did much to bring about general acceptance of Joule's work and the kinetic theory.
Thomson published more than 600 scientific papersFact|date=January 2008 and filed 70 patents (not all were issued). [http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/Physics3/Kelvin_online/Patents.htm]
Calculations on data-rate
Though now eminent in the academic field, Thomson was obscure to the general public. In September 1852, he married childhood sweetheart Margaret Crum but her health broke down on their
honeymoonand, over the next seventeen years, Thomson was distracted by her suffering. On 16 October 1854, George Gabriel Stokeswrote to Thomson to try to re-interest him in work by asking his opinion on some experiments of Michael Faradayon the proposed transatlantic telegraph cable.
:"To understand the technical issues in which Thomson became involved, see "
Faraday had demonstrated how the construction of a cable would limit the rate at which messages could be sent — in modern terms, the bandwidth. Thomson jumped at the problem and published his response that month. [- (1854) "On the theory of the electric telegraph" "Math. and Phys. Papers" vol.2, "p."61] He expressed his results in terms of the
data ratethat could be achieved and the economic consequences in terms of the potential revenueof the transatlantic undertaking. In a further 1855 analysis, [- (1855) "On the peristaltic induction of electric currents in submarine telegraph wires" "Math. and Phys. Papers" vol.2, "p."87] Thomson stressed the impact that the design of the cable would have on its profitability.
Thomson contended that the speed of a signal through a given core was inversely proportional to the square of the
lengthof the core. Thomson's results were disputed at a meeting of the British Association in 1856 by Wildman Whitehouse, the electricianof the Atlantic Telegraph Company. Whitehouse had possibly misinterpreted the results of his own experiments but was doubtless feeling financial pressure as plans for the cable were already well underway. He believed that Thomson's calculations implied that the cable must be "abandoned as being practically and commercially impossible."
Thomson attacked Whitehouse's contention in a letter to the popular "Athenaeum" magazine, [- (1855) "Letters on telegraph to America" "Math. and Phys. Papers" vol.2, "p."92] pitching himself into the public eye. Thomson recommended a larger conductor with a larger cross section of insulation. However, he thought Whitehouse no fool and suspected that he may have the practical skill to make the existing design work. Thomson's work had, however, caught the eye of the project's undertakers and in December 1856, he was elected to the
board of directorsof the Atlantic Telegraph Company.
cientist to engineer
Thomson became scientific adviser to a team with Whitehouse as chief electrician and Sir
Charles Tilston Brightas chief engineer but Whitehouse had his way with the specification, supported by Faraday and Samuel F. B. Morse.
Thomson sailed on board the cable-laying ship HMSS "Agamemnon" in August 1857, with Whitehouse confined to land owing to illness, but the voyage ended after just 380
miles when the cable parted. Thomson contributed to the effort by publishing in the "Engineer" the whole theory of the stresses involved in the laying of a submarine cable, and showed that when the line is running out of the ship, at a constant speed, in a uniform depth of water, it sinks in a slant or straight incline from the point where it enters the water to that where it touches the bottom. [- (1857) "Math. and Phys. Papers" vol.2, "p."154]
Thomson developed a complete system for operating a submarine telegraph that was capable of sending a character every 3.5
seconds. He patented the key elements of his system, the mirror galvanometerand the siphon recorder, in 1858.
However, Whitehouse still felt able to ignore Thomson's many suggestions and proposals. It was not until Thomson convinced the board that using a purer
copperfor replacing the lost section of cable would improve data capacity, that he first made a difference to the execution of the project. [Sharlin (1979) "p."141]
The board insisted that Thomson join the 1858 cable-laying expedition, without any financial compensation, and take an active part in the project. In return, Thomson secured a trial for his mirror galvanometer, about which the board had been unenthusiastic, alongside Whitehouse's equipment. However, Thomson found the access he was given unsatisfactory and the "Agamemnon" had to return home following the disastrous
stormof June 1858. Back in London, the board was on the point of abandoning the project and mitigating their losses by selling the cable. Thomson, Cyrus West Fieldand Curtis M. Lampsonargued for another attempt and prevailed, Thomson insisting that the technical problems were tractable. Though employed in an advisory capacity, Thomson had, during the voyages, developed real engineer's instincts and skill at practical problem-solving under pressure, often taking the lead in dealing with emergencies and being unafraid to lend a hand in manual work. A cable was finally completed on 5 August.
Disaster and triumph
Thomson's fears were realised and Whitehouse's apparatus proved insufficiently sensitive and had to be replaced by Thomson's mirror galvanometer. Whitehouse continued to maintain that it was his equipment that was providing the service and started to engage in desperate measures to remedy some of the problems. He succeeded only in fatally damaging the cable by applying 2,000
V. When the cable failed completely Whitehouse was dismissed, though Thomson objected and was reprimanded by the board for his interference. Thomson subsequently regretted that he had acquiesced too readily to many of Whitehouse's proposals and had not challenged him with sufficient energy. [Sharlin (1979) "p."144]
A joint committee of inquiry was established by the
Board of Tradeand the Atlantic Telegraph Company. Most of the blame for the cable's failure was found to rest with Whitehouse. ["Board of Trade Committee to Inquire into … Submarine Telegraph Cables’, Parl. papers (1860), 52.591, no. 2744] The committee found that, though underwater cables were notorious in their lack of reliability, most of the problems arose from known and avoidable causes. Thomson was appointed one of a five-member committee to recommend a specification for a new cable. The committee reported in October 1863. ["Report of the Scientific Committee Appointed to Consider the Best Form of Cable for Submersion Between Europe and America" (1863)]
In July 1865 Thomson sailed on the cable-laying expedition of the "
SS Great Eastern" but the voyage was again dogged with technical problems. The cable was lost after 1,200 miles had been laid and the expedition had to be abandoned. A further expedition in 1866 managed to lay a new cable in two weeks and then go on to recover and complete the 1865 cable. The enterprise was now feted as a triumph by the public and Thomson enjoyed a large share of the adulation. Thomson, along with the other principals of the project, was knightedon 10 November 1866.
To exploit his inventions for signalling on long submarine cables, Thomson now entered into a partnership with
C.F. Varleyand Fleeming Jenkin. In conjunction with the latter, he also devised an automatic curb sender, a kind of telegraph keyfor sending messages on a cable.
Thomson took part in the laying of the French Atlantic
submarine communications cableof 1869, and with Jenkin was engineer of the Western and Brazilian and Platino-Brazilian cables, assisted by vacation student James Alfred Ewing. He was present at the laying of the Pará to Pernambucosection of the Brazilian coast cables in 1873.
Thomson's wife had died on 17 June 1870 and he resolved to make changes in his life. Already addicted to seafaring, in September he purchased a 126
ton schooner, the "Lalla Rookh" and used it as a base for entertaining friends and scientific colleagues. His maritime interests continued in 1871 when he was appointed to the board of enquiry into the sinking of the HMS "Captain".
In June 1873, Thomson and Jenkin were onboard the "Hooper", bound for
Lisbonwith convert|2500|mi|km|-1 of cable when the cable developed a fault. An unscheduled 16-day stop-over in Madeirafollowed and Thomson became good friends with Charles R. Blandy and his three daughters. On 2 May 1874 he set sail for Madeira on the "Lalla Rookh". As he approached the harbour, he signalled to the Blandy residence "Will you marry me?" and Fanny signalled back "Yes". Thomson married Fanny, 13 years his junior, on 24 June 1874.
Thomson & Tait: "Treatise on Natural Philosophy"
Over the period 1855 to 1867, Thomson collaborated with
Peter Guthrie Taiton a text bookthat unified the various branches of physical science under the common principle of energy. Published in 1867, the " Treatise on Natural Philosophy" did much to define the modern discipline of physics.
Thomson was an enthusiastic yachtsman, his interest in all things relating to the sea perhaps arising, or at any rate fostered, from his experiences on the "Agamemnon" and the "Great Eastern".
Thomson introduced a method of deep-sea sounding, in which a steel
piano wirereplaces the ordinary land line. The wire glides so easily to the bottom that "flying soundings" can be taken while the ship is going at full speed. A pressure gauge to register the depth of the sinker was added by Thomson.
About the same time he revived the
Sumner methodof finding a ship's place at sea, and calculated a set of tables for its ready application. He also developed a tide predicting machine.
During the 1880s, Thomson worked to perfect the adjustable
compassin order to correct errors arising from magnetic deviationowing to the increasing use of ironin naval architecture. Thomson's design was a great improvement on the older instruments, being steadier and less hampered by friction, the deviation due to the ship's own magnetism being corrected by movable masses of iron at the binnacle. Thomson's innovations involved much detailed work to develop principles already identified by George Biddell Airyand others but contributed little in terms of novel physical thinking. Thomson's energetic lobbying and networking proved effective in gaining acceptance of his instrument by The Admiralty.
quotation | Scientific biographers of Thomson, if they have paid any attention at all to his compass innovations, have generally taken the matter to be a sorry saga of dim-witted naval administrators resisting marvellous innovations from a superlative scientific mind. Writers sympathetic to the Navy, on the other hand, portray Thomson as a man of undoubted talent and enthusiasm, with some genuine knowledge of the sea, who managed to parlay a handful of modest ideas in compass design into a commercial monopoly for his own manufacturing concern, using his reputation as a bludgeon in the law courts to beat down even small claims of originality from others, and persuading the Admiralty and the law to overlook both the deficiencies of his own design and the virtues of his competitors'.
The truth, inevitably, seems to lie somewhere between the two extremes. [Lindley (2004), "p."259]
Charles Babbagehad been among the first to suggest that a lighthousemight be made to signal a distinctive number by occultations of its light but Thomson pointed out the merits of the Morse codefor the purpose, and urged that the signals should consist of short and long flashes of the light to represent the dots and dashes.
Thomson did more than any other electrician up to his time to introduce accurate methods and apparatus for measuring electricity. As early as 1845 he pointed out that the experimental results of
William Snow Harriswere in accordance with the laws of Coulomb. In the "Memoirs of the Roman Academy of Sciences" for 1857 he published a description of his new divided ring electrometer, based on the old electroscope of Johann Gottlieb Friedrich von Bohnenbergerand he introduced a chain or series of effective instruments, including the quadrant electrometer, which cover the entire field of electrostatic measurement. He invented the current balance, also known as the "Kelvin balance" or "Ampere balance" ("SiC"), for the precise specification of the ampere, the standard unit of electric current.
In 1893, Thomson headed an international commission to decide on the design of the
Niagara Falls power station. Despite his previous belief in the superiority of direct current electric power transmission, he was convinced by Nikola Tesla's demonstration of three-phase alternating currentpower transmission at the Chicago World's Fair of that year and agreed to use Tesla's system. In 1896, Thomson said "Tesla has contributed more to electrical science than any man up to his time." [cite web | url=http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_niagara.html | title=Harnessing Niagara | work=Tesla: Master of Lightning | author=PBS | accessdate=2006-07-03 ]
Geology and theology
Thomson remained a devout believer in
Christianitythroughout his life: attendance at chapel was part of his daily routine, [McCartney & Whitaker (2002), reproduced on [http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/12/6 Institute of Physics website] ] though writers such as H.I. Sharlin argue he might not identify with fundamentalismif he were alive today. [Sharlin (1979) p.7] He saw his Christian faith as supporting and informing his scientific work, as is evident from his address to the annual meeting of the Christian Evidence Society, 23 May 1889. [Thomson, W. (1889) [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/William_Thomson%27s_account_of_his_Christian_faith Address to the Christian Evidence Society] ]
One of the clearest instances of this interaction is in his estimate of the
age of the Earth. Given his youthful work on the figure of the Earth and his interest in heat conduction, it is no surprise that he chose to investigate the Earth's cooling and to make historical inferences of the earth's age from his calculations. Thomson believed in an instant of creation but he was no creationist in the modern sense. [Sharlin (1979) "p."169] He contended that the laws of thermodynamicsoperated from the birth of the universe and envisaged a dynamic process that saw the organisation and evolution of the solar systemand other structures, followed by a gradual "heat death". He developed the view that the Earth had once been too hot to support lifeand contrasted this view with that of uniformitarianism, that conditions had remained constant since the indefinite past. He contended that "This earth, certainly a moderate number of millions of years ago, was a red-hot globe ... ." [Burchfield (1990)]
After the publication of
Charles Darwin's " On the Origin of Species" in 1859, Thomson saw evidence of the relatively short habitable age of the Earth as tending to contradict an evolutionary explanation of biological diversity. He noted that the suncould not have possibly existed long enough to allow the slow incremental development by evolution— unless some energy source beyond what he or any other Victorian eraperson knew of was found. He was soon drawn into public disagreement with Darwin's supporters John Tyndalland T.H. Huxley. In his response to Huxley’s address to the Geological Society of London (1868) he presented his address "Of Geological Dynamics", (1869) [ [http://zapatopi.net/kelvin/papers/of_geological_dynamics.html "Of Geological Dynamics" excerpts] ] which, among his other writings, set back the scientific acceptance that the earth must be of very great age.
Thomson ultimately settled on an estimate that the Earth was 20-40 million years old.
Limits of classical physics
In 1884, Thomson delivered a series of lectures at
Johns Hopkins Universityin the United Statesin which he attempted to formulate a physical model for the aether, a medium that would support the electromagnetic waves that were becoming increasingly important to the explanation of radiative phenomena. [Kargon & Achinstein (1987)] Imaginative as were the "Baltimore lectures", they had little enduring value owing to the imminent demise of the mechanical world view.
In 1900, he gave a lecture titled "Nineteenth-Century Clouds over the Dynamical Theory of Heat and Light". [The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, Series 6, volume 2, page 1 (1901)] The two "dark clouds" he was alluding to were the unsatisfactory explanations that the physics of the time could give for two phenomena: the
Michelson-Morley experimentand black bodyradiation. Two major physical theories were developed during the twentieth century starting from these issues: for the former, the Theory of relativity; for the second, quantum mechanics. Albert Einstein, in 1905, published the so-called " Annus Mirabilis Papers", one of which explained the photoelectric effect and was of the foundation papers of quantum mechanics, another of which described special relativity.
Pronouncements later proven to be false
Like many scientists of his day, he is known for making some embarrassing mistakes in terms of predicting the future of technology.
In 1895, Lord Kelvin declared that "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." [ [http://www.anvari.org/fortune/Famous_Last_Words/53_heavier-than-air-flying-machines-are-impossible-lord-kelvin-president-royal-society-1895.html Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible." - ] at www.anvari.org] This was to be proven spectacularly incorrect in the following decade.
In 1897, he predicted that "Radio has no future;" [ [http://www.nsba.org/sbot/toolkit/tnc.html Technology and Change ] ] while the popularity of radio did not appear in his lifetime (it was not until the 1920s and 30s that it attained any degree of popularity), the statement was nevertheless proven false.
In 1900, Lord Kelvin famously stated, "There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement.", and also proclaimed that "
X-rays are a hoax.". [ [http://www.webmediaexplorer.com/?action=quotes WebmediaExplorer.com ] ]
A variety of physical phenomena and concepts with which Thomson is associated are named "Kelvin":Always active in industrial
Kelvin water dropper
SIunit of temperature, kelvin
Kelvin transformin potential theory
Kelvin's circulation theorem
*Kelvin-bridge (also known as Thomson-bridge)
research and development, he was a Vice-Presidentof the Kodakcorporation.
Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1847.
Keith Medal, 1864.
Gunning Victoria Jubilee Prize, 1887.
**President, 1873–1878, 1886–1890, 1895–1907.
Fellow of the Royal Society, 1851.
Royal Medal, 1856.
Copley Medal, 1883.
BaronKelvin, of Largsin the County of Ayr, 1892. The title derives from the River Kelvin, which passes through the grounds of the University of Glasgow. His title died with him, as he was survived by neither heirs nor close relations.
*Knight Grand Cross of the Victorian Order, 1896.
*One of the first members of the Order of Merit, 1902.
*Privy Counsellor, 1902.
*First international recipient of
John Fritz Medal, 1905.
*He is buried in
Westminster Abbey, Londonnext to Isaac Newton.
The Kelvinator Corporation was founded in 1914 in
Detroit, Michigan. This name was very suitable for a company that manufactured ice-boxes and domestic refrigerators.
In popular culture
Lord Kelvin is portrayed by
Jim Broadbentin the 2004 film "Around the World in Eighty Days" as a bureaucratic scientist, sceptical of most modern inventions, and as an arch-villain, trying to delay the main character, Phileas Fogg.
Kelvin water dropper
Weaire-Phelan structurefor a solution to the Kelvin problemregarding partitioning space.
*cite book | author=Hörz, H. | title=Naturphilosophie als Heuristik?: Korrespondenz zwischen Hermann von Helmholtz und Lord Kelvin (William Thomson) | publisher=Basilisken-Presse | year=2000 | id=ISBN 3-925347-56-9
*cite book | author=Thomson, W. | title=Mathematical and Physical Papers | publisher=(6 vols) Cambridge University Press | year=1882-1911 | id=ISBN 0-521-05474-5
*cite book | author=- | title=Collected Papers in Physics and Engineering | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=1912 | id=ISBN B0000EFOL8
*cite book | author=Thomson, W. & Tait, P.G. | title=Treatise on Natural Philosophy | publisher=Oxford | year=1867 | id=
*cite book | author=Wilson, D.B. (ed.) | title=The Correspondence Between Sir George Gabriel Stokes and Sir William Thomson, Baron Kelvin of Largs | publisher=(2 vols), Cambridge University Press | year=1990 | id=ISBN 0-521-32831-4
Biography, history of ideas and criticism
* cite journal | author=Buchwald, J.Z. | year=1977 | title=William Thomson and the mathematization of Faraday's electrostatics | journal=Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences | volume=8 | pages=101–136
*cite book | author=Burchfield, J.D. | title=Lord Kelvin and the Age of the Earth | year=1990 | publisher=University of Chicago Press | id=ISBN 0-226-08043-9
* cite journal | author=Cardoso Dias, D.M. | year=1996 | title=William Thomson and the Heritage of Caloric | journal=Annals of Science | volume=53 | pages=511–520 | doi=10.1080/00033799600200361
*cite book | author=Chang, H. | title=Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=2004 | id=ISBN 0-19-517127-6
*cite journal | author=Gooding, D. | year=1980 | title=Faraday, Thomson, and the concept of the magnetic field | journal=British Journal of the History of Science | volume=13 | pages=91–120
*cite journal | author=Gossick, B.R. | year=1976 | title=Heaviside and Kelvin: a study in contrasts | journal=Annals of Science | volume=33 | pages=275–287 | doi = 10.1080/00033797600200561
*cite book | author=Gray, A. | title=Lord Kelvin: An Account of His Scientific Life and Work | year=1908 | location=London | publisher=J. M. Dent & Co | id=
*cite book | author=Green, G. & Lloyd, J.T. | title=Kelvin's instruments and the Kelvin Museum | year=1970 | location=Glasgow | publisher=University of Glasgow | id=ISBN 0-85261-016-5
* cite book | author=Kargon, R.H. & Achinstein, P. (eds.) | year=1987 | title=Kelvin's Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics; Historical and Philosophical Perspectives | publisher=Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press | id=ISBN 0-262-11117-9
* cite book | author=King, A.G. | year=1925 | title=Kelvin the Man | publisher=London: Hodder & Stoughton
* cite book | author=King, E.T. | year=1909 | title=Lord Kelvin's Early Home | publisher=London: Macmillan
*cite journal | author=Knudsen, O. | year=1972 | title=From Lord Kelvin's notebook: aether speculations | journal=Centaurus | volume=16 | pages=41–53 | doi = 10.1111/j.1600-0498.1972.tb00164.x
*cite book | author=Lindley, D. | title=Degrees Kelvin: A Tale of Genius, Invention and Tragedy | year=2004 | publisher=Joseph Henry Press | id=ISBN 0-309-09073-3
*cite book | author=McCartney, M. & Whitaker, A. (eds) | title=Physicists of Ireland: Passion and Precision | year=2002 | publisher=Institute of Physics Publishing | id=ISBN 0-7503-0866-4
*cite journal | year=1979 | author=May, W.E. | title=Lord Kelvin and his compass | journal=Journal of Navigation | volume=32 | pages=122–134
* cite book | author=Munro, J. | year=1891 | title=Heroes of the Telegraph | publisher=London: Religious Tract Society
* cite book | author=Murray, D. | year=1924 | title=Lord Kelvin as Professor in the Old College of Glasgow | publisher=Glasgow: Maclehose & Jackson
* cite book | author=Russell, A. | year=1908 | title=Lord Kelvin | publisher=London: Blackie
*cite book | author=Sharlin, H.I. | title=Lord Kelvin: The Dynamic Victorian | publisher=Pennsylvania State University Press | year=1979 | id=ISBN 0-271-00203-4
*cite book | author=Smith, C. & Wise, M.N. | title=Energy and Empire: A Biographical Study of Lord Kelvin | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=1989 | id=ISBN 0-521-26173-2
*cite book | author=Thompson, S.P. | title=Life of William Thomson: Baron Kelvin of Largs | publisher=Macmillan | location=London | year=1910 | id=
*cite book | author=Tunbridge, P. | title=Lord Kelvin: His Influence on Electrical Measurements and Units | location=Peter Peregrinus | publisher=London | year=1992 | id=ISBN 0-86341-237-8
* cite book | author=Wilson, D. | year=1910 | title=William Thomson, Lord Kelvin: His Way of Teaching | publisher=Glasgow: John Smith & Son
*cite book | author=Wilson, D.B. | title=Kelvin and Stokes: A Comparative Study in Victorian Physics | year=1987 | location=Bristol | publisher=Hilger | id=ISBN 0-85274-526-5
* [http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/Physics3/Kelvin_online/Kelvin_society/society.htm Kelvin Society of Glasgow]
* [http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/Physics3/Kelvin_online/ Lord Kelvin Online]
* [http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/Physics3/Kelvin_online/exhibit.html Lord Kelvin Exhibit: Image and Reality]
* [http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/Physics3/Kelvin_online/Patents.htm Lord Kelvin's Patents]
*" [http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/gutbook/lookup?num=979 Heroes of the Telegraph] " at
* [http://sheemere.hautetfort.com/archive/2007/10/16/des-chevaux-sur-mars.html Horses on Mars, from Lord Kelvin]
* [http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/15/12/6 William Thomson: king of Victorian physics] at
Institute of Physicswebsite
*" [http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/CPNSS/pdf/DP_withCover_Measurement/Meas-DP%2026%2002%20C.pdf Measuring the Absolute: William Thomson and Temperature] ", Hasok Chang and Sang Wook Yi (
* " [http://gallica.bnf.fr/notice?N=FRBNF37283720 Mathematical and physical papers. Volume I ] " (PDF copy from gallica.bnf.fr)
* " [http://gallica.bnf.fr/notice?N=FRBNF37283723 Mathematical and physical papers. Volume II] " (gallica)
* " [http://gallica.bnf.fr/notice?N=FRBNF37283725 Mathematical and physical papers. Volume III] " (gallica)
* " [http://www.archive.org/details/mathematicalandp029217mbp Mathematical and physical papers. Volume V] " (
* " [http://gallica.bnf.fr/notice?N=FRBNF37278042 Reprint of papers on electrostatics and magnetism] " (gallica)
* " [http://gallica.bnf.fr/notice?N=FRBNF37270966 Elements of natural philosophy : Part I] " (gallica)
* " [http://www.archive.org/details/treatisnatphil01kelvrich Treatise on natural philosophy (Volume 1)] "(
* " [http://www.archive.org/details/treatisnatphil02kelvrich Treatise on natural philosophy (Volume 2)] "(
* " [http://www.archive.org/details/moleculartactics00kelviala The molecular tactics of a crystal] " (
* " [http://www.archive.org/details/baltimorelecture00kelviala Baltimore lectures on molecular dynamics and the wave theory of light] " (
ALTERNATIVE NAMES=The Lord Kelvin; Thomson, William, 1st Baron Kelvin; Lord Kelvin; Baron Kelvin
SHORT DESCRIPTION=Mathematical physicist; engineer
DATE OF BIRTH=26 June 1824
PLACE OF BIRTH=
Belfast, United Kingdom
DATE OF DEATH=17 December 1907
PLACE OF DEATH=
Largs, Scotland, United Kingdom
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.