- Kinetic energy
The

**kinetic energy**of an object is the extraenergy which it possesses due to its motion. It is defined as "the work needed to accelerate a body of a given mass from rest to its current velocity". Having gained this energy during itsacceleration , the body maintains this kinetic energy unless its speed changes.Negative work of the same magnitude would be required to return the body to a state of rest from thatvelocity .**Etymology**The adjective "kinetic" to the noun

energy has its roots in the Greek word for "motion" ( κίνησηkinesis ). The terms "kinetic energy" and "work" and their present scientific meanings date back to the mid 19th century. Early understandings of these ideas can be attributed toGaspard-Gustave Coriolis who in 1829 published the paper titled "Du Calcul de l'Effet des Machines" outlining the mathematics of kinetic energy.William Thomson, later Lord Kelvin, is given the credit for coining the term "kinetic energy" c. 1849.Fact|date=February 2008

**Introduction**There are various forms of energy :

chemical energy ,heat ,electromagnetic radiation ,potential energy (gravitational, electric, elastic, etc.),nuclear energy ,rest energy . These can be categorized in two main classes:potential energy and kinetic energy.Kinetic energy can be best understood by examples that demonstrate how it is transformed from other forms of energy and to the other forms. For example, a cyclist will use chemical energy that was provided by food to accelerate a bicycle to a chosen speed. This speed can be maintained without further work, except to overcome air-resistance and friction. The energy has been converted into the energy of motion, known as

**kinetic energy**but the process is not completely efficient and heat is also produced within the cyclist.The kinetic energy in the moving

bicycle and thecyclist can be converted to other forms. For example, the cyclist could encounter a hill just high enough to coast up, so that the bicycle comes to a complete halt at the top. The kinetic energy has now largely been converted to gravitational potential energy that can be released by freewheeling down the other side of the hill. (Since the bicycle lost some of its energy to friction, it will never regain all of its speed without further pedaling. Note that the energy is not destroyed; it has only been converted to another form by friction.) Alternatively the cyclist could connect a dynamo to one of the wheels and also generate some electrical energy on the descent. The bicycle would be traveling more slowly at the bottom of the hill because some of the energy has been diverted into making electrical power. Another possibility would be for the cyclist to apply the brakes, in which case the kinetic energy would be dissipated through friction as heat energy.Like any physical quantity which is a function of velocity, the kinetic energy of an object does not depend only on the inner nature of that object. It also depends on the relationship between that object and the observer (in physics an observer is formally defined by a particular class of coordinate system called an "

inertial reference frame "). Thus the kinetic energy of an object depends on the frame of reference. Physical quantities like this are said to be not "invariant". However, while the total kinetic energy of aisolated system also depends on the inertial frame of reference, any changes of the total kinetic energy do not. This is related to theconservation of momentum . See also below.The kinetic energy is co-located with the object and contributes to its gravitational field.

**Calculations**There are several different equations that may be used to calculate the kinetic energy of an object. In many cases they give almost the same answer to well within measurable accuracy. Where they differ, the choice of which to use is determined by the velocity of the body or its size. Thus, if the object is moving at a velocity much smaller than the speed of light, the Newtonian (classical) mechanics will be sufficiently accurate; but if the speed is comparable to the speed of light, relativity starts to make significant differences to the result and should be used. If the size of the object is sub-atomic, the

quantum mechanical equation is most appropriate.**Newtonian kinetic energy****Kinetic energy of rigid bodies**In

classical mechanics , the kinetic energy of a "point object" (a body so small that its size can be ignored), or a non rotatingrigid body , is given by the equation $E\_k\; =\; egin\{matrix\}\; frac\{1\}\{2\}\; end\{matrix\}\; mv^2$ where m is the mass and v is the speed of the body.For example - one would calculate the kinetic energy of an 80 kg mass traveling at 18 meters per second (40 mph) as :$egin\{matrix\}\; frac\{1\}\{2\}\; end\{matrix\}\; cdot\; 80\; cdot\; 18^2\; =\; 12,960\; mathrm\{joules\}$.

Note that the kinetic energy increases with the square of the speed. This means, for example, that an object traveling twice as fast will have four times as much kinetic energy. As a result of this, a car traveling twice as fast requires four times as much distance to stop (assuming a constant braking force. See

mechanical work ).Thus, the kinetic energy can be calculated using the formula::$E\_k\; =\; frac\{1\}\{2\}mv^2$

where::"E"

_{k}is the kinetic energy injoule s:"m" is the mass in kilograms, and:"v" is the speed in meters per second.For the "translational kinetic energy" of a body with constant

mass "m", whosecenter of mass is moving in a straight line with speed "v", as seen above is equal to:$E\_t\; =\; egin\{matrix\}\; frac\{1\}\{2\}\; end\{matrix\}\; mv^2$

where::"m" is mass of the body:"v" is speed of the

center of mass of the body.Thus kinetic energy is a relative measure and no object can be said to have a unique kinetic energy. A rocket engine could be seen to transfer its energy to the rocket ship or to the exhaust stream depending upon the chosen frame of reference. But the total energy of the system, i.e. kinetic energy, fuel chemical energy, heat energy etc, will be conserved regardless of the choice of measurement frame.

The kinetic energy of an object is related to its

momentum by the equation::$E\_k\; =\; frac\{p^2\}\{2m\}$**Derivation and definition**The work done accelerating a particle during the infinitesimal time interval "dt" is given by the dot product of "force" and "displacement"::$mathbf\{F\}\; cdot\; d\; mathbf\{x\}\; =\; mathbf\{F\}\; cdot\; mathbf\{v\}\; d\; t\; =\; frac\{d\; mathbf\{p\{d\; t\}\; cdot\; mathbf\{v\}\; d\; t\; =\; mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; d\; mathbf\{p\}\; =\; mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; d\; (m\; mathbf\{v\})$

Applying the product rule we see that: :$d(mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; mathbf\{v\})\; =\; (d\; mathbf\{v\})\; cdot\; mathbf\{v\}\; +\; mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; (d\; mathbf\{v\})\; =\; 2(mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; dmathbf\{v\})$

Therefore (assuming constant mass), the following can be seen::$mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; d\; (m\; mathbf\{v\})\; =\; frac\{m\}\{2\}\; d\; (mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; mathbf\{v\})\; =\; frac\{m\}\{2\}\; d\; v^2\; =\; d\; left(frac\{m\; v^2\}\{2\}\; ight)$

Since this is a total differential (that is, it only depends on the final state, not how the particle got there), we can integrate it and call the result kinetic energy::$E\_k\; =\; int\; mathbf\{F\}\; cdot\; d\; mathbf\{x\}\; =\; int\; mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; d\; mathbf\{p\}=\; frac\{m\; v^2\}\{2\}$

This equation states that the kinetic energy ("E

_{k}") is equal to theintegral of thedot product of thevelocity (**v**) of a body and theinfinitesimal change of the body'smomentum (**p**). It is assumed that the body starts with no kinetic energy when it is at rest (motionless).**Kinetic energy of systems**A rotating body, even if it is stationary as a whole, has kinetic energy, see also below.

Also, a body that is stationary and not rotating as a whole has

internal energy , which is partly kinetic energy, due to molecular translation, rotation, and vibration, electron translation and spin, and nuclear spin. When discussing movements of macroscopic bodies the kinetic energies referred to are usually those of the macroscopic movements only.A system of bodies may also have internal kinetic energy due to macroscopic movements of the bodies in the system. For example, in the

Solar System the planets and planetoids are orbiting the Sun.The kinetic energy of the system at any instant in time is the sum of the kinetic energies of the masses.

**Frame of reference**The total kinetic energy of a system depends on the

inertial frame of reference : it is the sum of the total kinetic energy in acenter of momentum frame and the kinetic energy the total mass would have if it were concentrated in thecenter of mass .This may be simply shown: let V be the relative speed of the frame "k" from the center of mass frame "i" :

:$E\_k\; =\; int\; frac\{v^2\; dm\}\{2\}\; =\; int\; frac\{(v\_i\; +\; V)^2\; dm\}\{2\}\; =\; int\; frac\{(v\_i^2\; +\; 2\; v\_i\; V\; +\; V^2)\; dm\}\{2\}\; =\; int\; frac\{v\_i^2\; dm\}\{2\}\; +\; V\; int\; v\_i\; dm\; +\; frac\{V^2\}\{2\}\; int\; dm$

However, let $int\; frac\{v\_i^2\; dm\}\{2\}\; =\; E\_i$ the kinetic energy in the center of mass frame, $int\; v\_i\; dm$ would be simply the total momentum which is by definition zero in the center of mass frame, and let the total mass: $int\; dm\; =\; M$. Substituting, we get: [

*[*]*http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Class/intro_physics_1/intro_physics_1/node64.html Physics notes - Kinetic energy in the CM frame*] . Duke.edu. Accessed 2007-11-24.:$E\_k\; =\; E\_i\; +\; frac\{M\; V^2\}\{2\}$

Thus the kinetic energy of a system is lowest with respect to center of momentum reference frames, i.e., frames of reference in which the center of mass is stationary. In any other frame of reference there is additional kinetic energy corresponding to the total mass moving at the speed of the center of mass. In an

isolated system no more kinetic energy can be converted to other forms of energy than the kinetic energy with respect to center of momentum reference frames; the kinetic energy corresponding to the total mass moving at the speed of the center of mass is never converted.**Rotating bodies**If a rigid body is rotating about any line through the center of mass then it has "rotational kinetic energy" ($E\_r$) which is simply the sum of the kinetic energies of its moving parts, and thus it is equal to:

:$E\_r\; =\; int\; frac\{v^2\; dm\}\{2\}\; =\; int\; frac\{(r\; omega)^2\; dm\}\{2\}\; =\; frac\{omega^2\}\{2\}\; int\{r^2\}dm\; =\; frac\{omega^2\}\{2\}\; I\; =\; egin\{matrix\}\; frac\{1\}\{2\}\; end\{matrix\}\; I\; omega^2$

where:

*ω is the body'sangular velocity

*r is the distance of any mass dm from that line

*"I" is the body'smoment of inertia $=\; int\{r^2\}dm$(In this equation the moment of inertia must be taken about an axis through the center of mass and the rotation measured by ω must be around that axis; more general equations exist for systems where the object is subject to wobble due to its eccentric shape).

**Rotation in systems**It sometimes is convenient to split the total kinetic energy of a body into the sum of the body's center-of-mass translational kinetic energy and the energy of rotation around the center of mass

rotational energy ::$E\_k\; =\; E\_t\; +\; E\_r\; ,$

where::"E

_{k}" is the total kinetic energy:"E_{t}" is the translational kinetic energy:"E_{r}" is the "rotational energy" or "angular kinetic energy" in the rest frameThus the kinetic energy of a tennis ball in flight is the kinetic energy due to its rotation, plus the kinetic energy due to its translation.

**Relativistic kinetic energy of rigid bodies**In

special relativity , we must change the expression for linear momentum. Integrating by parts, we get::$E\_k\; =\; int\; mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; d\; mathbf\{p\}=\; int\; mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; d\; (m\; gamma\; mathbf\{v\})\; =\; m\; gamma\; mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; mathbf\{v\}\; -\; int\; m\; gamma\; mathbf\{v\}\; cdot\; d\; mathbf\{v\}\; =\; m\; gamma\; v^2\; -\; frac\{m\}\{2\}\; int\; gamma\; d\; (v^2)$Remembering that $gamma\; =\; (1\; -\; v^2/c^2)^\{-1/2\}!$, we get::$E\_k\; =\; m\; gamma\; v^2\; -\; frac\{-\; m\; c^2\}\{2\}\; int\; gamma\; d\; (1\; -\; v^2/c^2)\; =\; m\; gamma\; v^2\; +\; m\; c^2\; (1\; -\; v^2/c^2)^\{1/2\}\; +\; C$And thus::$E\_k\; =\; m\; gamma\; (v^2\; +\; c^2\; (1\; -\; v^2/c^2))\; +\; C\; =\; m\; gamma\; (v^2\; +\; c^2\; -\; v^2)\; +\; C\; =\; m\; gamma\; c^2\; +\; C!$The constant of integration is found by observing that $gamma\; =\; 1!$ and $E\_k\; =\; 0\; !$ when $mathbf\{v\; \}=\; 0$, so we get the usual formula::$E\_k\; =\; m\; gamma\; c^2\; -\; m\; c^2\; =\; frac\{m\; c^2\}\{sqrt\{1\; -\; v^2/c^2\; -\; m\; c^2$If a body's speed is a significant fraction of the

speed of light , it is necessary to use**relativistic mechanics**(the theory of relativity as expounded byAlbert Einstein ) to calculate its kinetic energy.For a relativistic object the momentum p is equal to:

:$p\; =\; frac\{m\; v\}\{sqrt\{1\; -\; (v/c)^2$,

where "m" is the

rest mass , "v" is the object's speed, and "c" is the speed of light in vacuum.Thus the work expended accelerating an object from rest to a relativistic speed is:

:$E\_k\; =\; frac\{m\; c^2\}\{sqrt\{1\; -\; (v/c)^2\; -\; m\; c^2$.

The equation shows that the energy of an object approaches infinity as the velocity "v" approaches the speed of light "c", thus it is impossible to accelerate an object across this boundary.

The mathematical by-product of this calculation is the

mass-energy equivalence formula—the body at rest must have energy content equal to::$E\_mbox\{rest\}\; =\; m\; c^2\; !$

At a low speed (v<

binomial approximation. Indeed, taking Taylor expansion for square root and keeping first two terms we get::$E\_k\; approx\; m\; c^2\; left(1\; +\; frac\{1\}\{2\}\; v^2/c^2\; ight)\; -\; m\; c^2\; =\; frac\{1\}\{2\}\; m\; v^2$,

So, the total energy E can be partitioned into the energy of the rest mass plus the traditional Newtonian kinetic energy at low speeds.

When objects move at a speed much slower than light (e.g. in everyday phenomena on Earth), the first two terms of the series predominate. The next term in the approximation is small for low speeds, and can be found by extending the expansion into a Taylor series by one more term:

:$E\; approx\; m\; c^2\; left(1\; +\; frac\{1\}\{2\}\; v^2/c^2\; +\; frac\{3\}\{8\}\; v^4/c^4\; ight)\; =\; m\; c^2\; +\; frac\{1\}\{2\}\; m\; v^2\; +\; frac\{3\}\{8\}\; m\; v^4/c^2$.

For example, for a speed of 10 km/s the correction to the Newtonian kinetic energy is 0.07 J/kg (on a Newtonian kinetic energy of 50 MJ/kg) and for a speed of 100 km/s it is 710 J/kg (on a Newtonian kinetic energy of 5 GJ/kg), etc.

For higher speeds, the formula for the relativistic kinetic energy [

*In Einstein's original [*] is derived by simply subtracting the rest mass energy from the total energy:*http://www.uni-kiel.de/ub/digiport/ab1800/G4378.html Über die spezielle und die allgemeine Relativitätstheorie*] (Zu Seite 41) and in most translations (e.g. [*http://bartleby.com/173/15.html Relativity - The Special and General Theory*] ) kinetic energy is defined as $m\; c^2\; /\; sqrt\{1\; -\; v^2/c^2\}$.:$E\_k\; =\; m\; gamma\; c^2\; -\; m\; c^2\; =\; m\; c^2left(frac\{1\}\{sqrt\{1\; -\; (v/c)^2\; -\; 1\; ight)$.

The relation between kinetic energy and

momentum is more complicated in this case, and is given by the equation::$E\_k\; =\; sqrt\{p^2\; c^2\; +\; m^2\; c^4\}\; -\; m\; c^2$.

This can also be expanded as a

Taylor series , the first term of which is the simple expression from Newtonian mechanics.What this suggests is that the formulas for energy and momentum are not special and axiomatic, but rather concepts which emerge from the equation of mass with energy and the principles of relativity.

**Quantum mechanical kinetic energy of rigid bodies**In the realm of quantum mechanics, the expectation value of the electron kinetic energy, $langlehat\{T\}\; angle$, for a system of electrons described by the wavefunction $vertpsi\; angle$ is a sum of 1-electron operator expectation values::$langlehat\{T\}\; angle\; =\; -frac\{hbar^2\}\{2\; m\_e\}igglanglepsi\; iggvert\; sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; abla^2\_i\; iggvert\; psi\; igg\; angle$where $m\_e$ is the mass of the electron and $abla^2\_i$ is the

Laplacian operator acting upon the coordinates of the "i"^{th}electron and the summation runs over all electrons. Notice that this is the quantized version of the non-relativistic expression for kinetic energy in terms of momentum::$E\_k\; =\; frac\{p^2\}\{2m\}$The density functional formalism of quantum mechanics requires knowledge of the electron density "only", i.e., it formally does not require knowledge of the wavefunction. Given an electron density $ho(mathbf\{r\})$, the exact N-electron kinetic energy functional is unknown; however, for the specific case of a 1-electron system, the kinetic energy can be written as:$T\; [\; ho]\; =\; frac\{1\}\{8\}\; int\; frac\{\; abla\; ho(mathbf\{r\})\; cdot\; abla\; ho(mathbf\{r\})\; \}\{\; ho(mathbf\{r\})\; \}\; d^3r$where $T\; [\; ho]$ is known as the Von Weizsacker kinetic energy functional.

**ome examples**Spacecraft use chemical energy to take off and gain considerable kinetic energy to reachorbital velocity . This kinetic energy gained during launch will remain constant while in orbit because there is almost no friction. However it becomes apparent at re-entry when the kinetic energy is converted to heat.Kinetic energy can be passed from one object to another. In the game of

billiards , the player gives kinetic energy to the cue ball by striking it with the cue stick. If the cue ball collides with another ball, it will slow down dramatically and the ball it collided with will accelerate to a speed as the kinetic energy is passed on to it.Collisions in billiards are effectively elastic collisions, where kinetic energy is preserved.Flywheel s are being developed as a method ofenergy storage (see articleflywheel energy storage ). This illustrates that kinetic energy can also be rotational. Note the formula in the articles on flywheels for calculating rotational kinetic energy is different, though analogous.**ee also***

Recoil

*Joule

*Parallel axis theorem

*Escape velocity

* Kinetic energy per unit mass of projectiles

* Kinetic projectile**Notes****References***

*

*

*

*"Oxford Dictionary", Oxford Dictionary 1998

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*