The Kramers–Kronig relations are mathematical properties, connecting the real and imaginary parts of any complex function which is analytic in the upper half plane. These relations are often used to relate the real and imaginary parts of response functions in physical systems because causality implies the analyticity condition is satisfied and conversely. [John S. Toll, "Causality and the Dispersion Relation: Logical Foundations", Physical Review, vol. "104", pp. 1760 - 1770 (1956).] The relation is named in honor of Ralph Kronig [R. de L. Kronig, "On the theory of the dispersion of X-rays," J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. 12, pp. 547-557 (1926).] and Hendrik Anthony Kramers. [H.A. Kramers, "La diffusion de la lumiere par les atomes," Atti Cong. Intern. Fisica, (Transactions of Volta Centenary Congress) Como, vol. 2, p. 545-557 (1927) .]
Definition
For a complex function of the complex variable , analytic in the upper half plane of and which vanishes as , the Kramers–Kronig relations are given by
:
and:
where denotes the Cauchy principal value. We see that the real and imaginary parts of such a function are not independent, so that the full function can be reconstructed given just one of its parts.
Derivation
The proof begins with an application of the residue theorem for complex integration. Given any analytic function in the upper half plane, consider the integral
:
The contour encloses the upper half plane at infinity, the real axis and a hump over the pole (complex analysis) at leaving no poles inside, and so the integral vanishes. We decompose the integral into its contributions along each of these three contour segments. The segment at infinity vanishes since we assume vanishes as we take . We are left with the segment along the real axis and the half-circle:
:
Rearranging, we arrive at the compact form of the Kramers–Kronig relations,
:
The single in the denominator hints at the connection between the real and imaginary components. Finally, split and the equation into their real and imaginary parts to obtain the forms quoted above.
Physical interpretation and alternate form
We can apply the Kramers–Kronig formalism to response functions. In physics, the response function describes how some property of a physical system responds to an applied force . For example, could be the angle of a pendulum and the applied force of a motor driving the pendulum motion. The response must be zero for