- Pedro II of Brazil
-
Pedro II Emperor Dom Pedro II at age 61, 1887 Emperor of Brazil Reign 7 April 1831 – 15 November 1889
( 58 years, 222 days)Coronation 18 July 1841 Predecessor Pedro I Titular Emperor of Brazil Pretendence 15 November 1889 – 5 December 1891
( 2 years, 20 days)Successor Isabel, Princess Imperial Spouse Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies Issue Afonso, Prince Imperial
Isabel, Princess Imperial
Leopoldina, Princess of Saxe-Coburg-Kohary
Pedro, Prince ImperialFull name Pedro de Alcântara João Carlos Leopoldo Salvador Bibiano Francisco Xavier de Paula Leocádio Miguel Gabriel Rafael Gonzaga House House of Braganza Father Pedro I of Brazil Mother Maria Leopoldina of Austria Born 2 December 1825
Palace of São Cristóvão, Rio de JaneiroDied 5 December 1891 (aged 66)
Paris, FranceBurial Imperial Mausoleum, Petrópolis Signature Religion Roman Catholicism This article is part of a series related to
Pedro II of Brazil ...Early life (1825–40)
Consolidation (1840–53)
Growth (1853–64)
Paraguayan War (1864–70)
Apogee (1870–81)
Decline and fall (1881–89)
Exile and death (1889–91)
Legacy
Dom Pedro II (English: Peter II; 2 December 1825 – 5 December 1891), nicknamed "the Magnanimous",[1][2] was the second and last ruler of the Empire of Brazil, reigning for over 58 years.[A] Born in Rio de Janeiro, he was the seventh child of Emperor Dom Pedro I of Brazil and Empress Dona Maria Leopoldina and thus a member of the Brazilian branch of the House of Braganza. His father's abrupt abdication and flight to Europe in 1831 left a five-year-old Pedro as Emperor and led to a grim and lonely childhood and adolescence. Obliged to spend his time studying in preparation for rule, he knew only brief moments of happiness and encountered few friends of his age. His experiences with court intrigues and political disputes during this period greatly affected his later character. Pedro II grew into a man with a strong sense of duty and devotion toward his country and his people. On the other hand, he increasingly resented his role as monarch.
Inheriting an Empire on the verge of disintegration, Pedro II turned Portuguese-speaking Brazil into an emerging power in the international arena. The nation grew to be distinguished from its Hispanic neighbors on account of its political stability, zealously guarded freedom of speech, respect for civil rights, vibrant economic growth and especially for its form of government: a functional, representative parliamentary monarchy. Brazil was also victorious in three international conflicts (the Platine War, the Uruguayan War and the Paraguayan War) under his rule, as well as prevailing in several other international disputes and domestic tensions. Pedro steadfastly pushed through the abolition of slavery despite opposition from powerful political and economic interests. A savant in his own right, the Emperor established a reputation as a vigorous sponsor of learning, culture and the sciences. He won the respect and admiration of scholars such as Charles Darwin, Victor Hugo and Friedrich Nietzsche, and was a friend to Richard Wagner, Louis Pasteur and Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, among others.
Although there was no desire for a change in the form of government among most Brazilians, the Emperor was overthrown in a sudden coup d'état that had almost no support outside a clique of military leaders who desired a form of republic headed by a dictator. Pedro II had become weary of emperorship and despaired over the monarchy's future prospects, despite its overwhelming popular support. He allowed no prevention of his ouster and did not support any attempt to restore the monarchy. He spent the last two years of his life in exile in Europe, living alone on very little money.
The reign of Pedro II thus came to an unusual end—he was overthrown while highly regarded by the people and at the pinnacle of his popularity, and some of his accomplishments were soon brought to naught as Brazil slipped into a long period of weak governments, dictatorships, and constitutional and economic crises. The men who had exiled him soon began to see in him a model for the Brazilian republic. A few decades after his death, his reputation was restored and his remains were returned to Brazil as those of a national hero. This reputation has lasted to the present day. Historians have regarded the Emperor in an extremely positive light, and he is usually ranked as the greatest Brazilian.
Contents
Early life
Main article: Early life of Pedro II of BrazilBirth
Pedro was born at 02:30 on 2 December 1825 in the Palace of São Cristóvão, in Rio de Janeiro.[3][4][5] Named after St. Peter of Alcantara,[6][7] his name in full was Pedro de Alcântara João Carlos Leopoldo Salvador Bibiano Francisco Xavier de Paula Leocádio Miguel Gabriel Rafael Gonzaga.[1][8][9][7]
Through his father, Emperor Pedro I, he was a member of the Brazilian branch of the House of Braganza (Portuguese: Bragança) and was referred to using the honorific "Dom" (Lord) from birth.[10] He was the grandson of Portuguese King Dom João VI and nephew of Dom Miguel I.[11][12] His mother was the Archduchess Maria Leopoldina of Austria, daughter of Franz II, the last Holy Roman Emperor. Through his mother, Pedro was a nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte and first cousin of Emperors Napoleon II of France, Franz Joseph I (Francis Joseph I) of Austria-Hungary and Don Maximiliano I (Maximilian I) of Mexico.[12][13][14]
The only legitimate male child of Pedro I to survive infancy, he was officially recognized as heir to the Brazilian throne with the title Prince Imperial on 6 August 1826.[8][15] Empress Leopoldina died on 11 December 1826, a few days following the stillbirth of a male child,[16] when Pedro was a year old.[14] Pedro would have no memory of his mother apart from what he was later told about her.[17][18] The memory and influence of his father also faded, and by the time he was an adult, "he retained no strong images of him".[19]
Two and a half years after the death of Leopoldina, the Emperor married Amélie of Leuchtenberg. Prince Pedro spent little time with his stepmother; nevertheless, they had an affectionate relationship[20][21][22] and kept contact until her death in 1873.[23] Emperor Pedro I abdicated on 7 April 1831, after a long conflict with the liberal faction (which itself later split into what would become the two dominant parties under the monarchy, the Conservative and Liberal parties). He and Amélie immediately departed for Europe to restore his daughter to the Portuguese throne, which had been usurped by his brother Miguel I.[24][25] Left behind, Prince Imperial Pedro became Dom Pedro II, Constitutional Emperor and Perpetual Defender of Brazil.[5]
Education
Upon leaving the country, Emperor Pedro I selected three people to take charge of his son and remaining daughters. The first was José Bonifácio de Andrada, his friend and an influential leader during Brazilian independence, who was named guardian.[26][27] The second was Mariana de Verna, who had held the post of aia (governess) since the birth of Pedro II.[28] As a child, the Prince Imperial called her "Dadama", as he could not pronounce the word dama (Lady) correctly.[15] Pedro II regarded her as his surrogate mother, and would continue to call her by her nickname well into adulthood out of affection.[3][29] The third person was Rafael, an Afro-Brazilian veteran of the Cisplatine War.[28][30] Rafael was an employee in the Palace of São Cristóvão (Pedro II's primary residence from infancy)[31] whom Pedro I deeply trusted and asked to look after his son—a charge which he carried out during the rest of his life.[8][30]
Bonifácio was dismissed from his position in December 1833 and replaced by another guardian.[32][33][34] Pedro II spent his days studying,[35] with only two hours set aside for amusements.[36] He would wake at 6.30 a.m. and begin his studies at seven, continuing until 10 p.m., after which he would go to bed.[37] Great care was taken in his education to foster values and a character different from the impulsiveness and irresponsibility which had been displayed by his father.[32][38] His passion for reading allowed him to assimilate any information.[39] Pedro II was no genius,[40] but he was intelligent[41] and able to acquire knowledge with great ease.[42]
The Emperor experienced an unhappy and solitary childhood.[8][43] The sudden loss of his parents would shadow him later in life;[44] he had few friends of his age,[28][37][45] and contact with his sisters was limited.[32][35][45] The environment in which he was raised turned him into a shy and needy person[46][47] who saw books as a refuge and retreat from the real world.[48][49]
Early coronation
The elevation of Pedro II to the Imperial throne in 1831 led to a period of crisis, the most troublesome in Brazil's history.[50] A regency had been created to rule on his behalf until he reached the age of majority.[24] Disputes between political factions led to several rebellions and resulted in an unstable, almost anarchical, situation under the regents.[51]
The possibility of lowering the young emperor's age of majority, instead of waiting until he turned 18 on 2 December 1843, had been floated since 1835.[52][53][54] The idea had received support from both main political parties.[53][55] It was thought that those assisting him in taking the reins of government would be in a position to manipulate the inexperienced youth.[56] Those politicians who had risen to power during the 1830s had by now also become familiar with the pitfalls of rule. According to historian Roderick J. Barman, by 1840 "they had lost all faith in their ability to rule the country on their own. They accepted Pedro II as an authority figure whose presence was indispensable for the country's survival."[57] The Brazilian people also supported lowering the age of majority,[58] as they considered Pedro II "the living symbol of the unity of the fatherland"; this position "gave him, in the eyes of public opinion, a higher authority than that of any regent."[59]
Those advocating the immediate elevation of Pedro II to majority passed a motion requesting the Emperor assume full powers.[60] A delegation was sent to the Palace of São Cristóvão to ask whether Pedro II would accept or reject an early declaration of his majority.[60][61][62] He shyly answered "Yes" when asked if he desired the age of majority to be lowered, and "Now" when asked if he would prefer that it come into effect at that moment or would rather await his birthday in December.[63][64] On the following day, 23 July 1840, the Assembléia Geral (General Assembly or Parliament) formally declared the 14-year-old Pedro II of age.[65][66] There, in the afternoon, the young emperor took the oath of office.[67][68] He was acclaimed, crowned and consecrated on 18 July 1841.[69][70]
Consolidation
Main article: Consolidation of Pedro II of BrazilMarriage
Removal of the factious regency stabilized the government. With a legitimate monarch on the throne, authority was vested in a single, clear voice.[71] Pedro II perceived his role as that of an arbiter, keeping personal views from hindering his duty to untangle partisan political disputes.[71] The young Emperor was diligent in his new role, making daily personal inspections and visits to government branches. His subjects were impressed by his seeming self-confidence,[71] although his shyness and lack of social grace were considered flaws. His reticence in only offering a word or two at a time rendered direct conversation with him extremely difficult.[72] His taciturn nature manifested a caution in close relationships that traced to incidents of abandonment, intrigue and betrayal experienced during his childhood.[73]
Behind the scenes, a group of high ranking palace servants and notable politicians became known as the "Courtier Faction" as they established influence over the young Emperor—and some were very close indeed.[74] Pedro II was deftly used by the courtiers to eliminate their foes (actual or suspected) by obtaining the dismissal of rivals. Access to his person by rival politicians and the flow of information he received were strictly controlled. A continuous round of meetings, study, personal appearances and government business, used as distractions, kept the Emperor occupied, effectively isolating and keeping him unaware of being exploited.[75]
Concerned about the Emperor's taciturnity and immaturity, the courtiers believed marriage would improve his behavior and character.[76] The government of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies offered the hand of Princess Teresa Cristina.[77][78][79] A portrait of Teresa Cristina was sent by the Kingdom to Pedro II, depicting a beautiful young woman and prompting him to accept the match.[80][81] Pedro II and Teresa Cristina were married by proxy in Naples on 30 May 1843.[82][83][84] The new Empress arrived in Brazil on 3 September 1843.[85][86] Upon seeing her in person, the Emperor was noticeably disappointed.[87][88][89] The picture he had been sent was an obvious idealization; the real Teresa Cristina was short, a bit overweight, walked with a pronounced limp and though not ugly, neither was she pretty.[87][88][90] He did little to hide his disillusionment. One observer stated that he turned his back to Teresa Cristina, another depicted him as being so shocked that he needed to sit, and it is possible that both occurred.[87] That evening, Pedro II wept and complained to Mariana de Verna, "They have deceived me, Dadama!"[87][89][91] It took several hours to convince him that duty demanded that he proceed.[87][89][91] The Nuptial Mass, with the ratification of the vows previously taken by proxy and the conferral of the nuptial blessing, occurred on the following day, 4 September 1843.[92][93][94]
Imperial authority established
By 1846 Pedro II had matured physically and mentally. He was no longer an insecure 14-year-old swayed by gossip, suggestions of secret plots, and other manipulative tactics.[95] He grew into a man who, at 1.90 meters (6 ft 3 in) tall[96][97] with blue eyes and blond hair,[62][87][96] was described as handsome.[39][87][98] With growth, his weaknesses faded and his strengths of character came to the fore. He learned to be not only impartial and diligent, but also courteous, patient and personable. As he began to fully exercise authority, his new social skills and diligence in government contributed greatly to his effectiveness and public image.[95] Historian Roderick J. Barman describes him at this time: "He kept his emotions under iron discipline. He was never rude and never lost his temper. He was exceptionally discreet in words and cautious in action."[99]
The end of 1845 through the beginning of 1846 found the Emperor making a tour of Brazil's southern provinces, traveling through Santa Catarina, São Paulo (of which Paraná was a part at this time) and Rio Grande do Sul. He was buoyed by the warm and enthusiastic responses he received.[100] This success encouraged him, for the first time in his life, to act confidently on his own initiative and insights.[101] Most importantly, this period saw the end of the Courtier Faction. Pedro II successfully engineered the end of the courtiers' influence by removing them from his inner circle while avoiding any public disruption.[102]
Pedro II was faced by three crises between 1848 and 1852.[99] The first test came in confronting the trade in illegally imported slaves. This had been banned in 1826 as part of a treaty with Britain.[103] Trafficking continued unabated, however, and the British government's passage of the Aberdeen Act of 1845 authorized British warships to board Brazilian shipping and seize any found involved in the slave trade.[104] While Brazil grappled with this problem, the Praieira revolt erupted on 6 November 1848. This was a conflict between local political factions within Pernambuco province, and was suppressed by March 1849. A bill was promulgated on 4 September 1850 which gave government broad authority to combat the illegal slave trade. With this new tool, Brazil moved to eliminate importation of slaves. By 1852 this first crisis was over, with Britain accepting that the trade had been suppressed.[105]
The third crisis entailed a conflict with the Argentine Confederation regarding ascendancy over territories adjacent to the Río de la Plata and free navigation of that waterway.[106] Since the 1830s, Argentine dictator Don Juan Manuel de Rosas had supported rebellions within Uruguay and Brazil. It was only in 1850 that Brazil was able to address the threat posed by Rosas.[106] An alliance was forged between Brazil, Uruguay and disaffected Argentines,[106] leading to the Platine War and the subsequent overthrow of the Argentine ruler in February 1852.[107][108] In the words of historian Roderick J. Barman, a "considerable portion of the credit must be ... assigned to the emperor, whose cool head, tenacity of purpose, and sense of what was feasible proved indispensable."[99]
The Empire's successful navigation of these crises considerably enhanced the nation's stability and prestige, and Brazil emerged as a hemispheric power.[109] Internationally, Europeans began to regard the country as embodying familiar liberal ideals, such as freedom of the press and constitutional respect for civil liberties. Its representative parliamentary monarchy also stood in stark contrast to the mix of dictatorships and instability endemic in the other nations of South America during this period.[110][111][112]
Growth
Main article: Growth of Pedro II of BrazilPedro II and politics
At the beginning of the 1850s, Brazil was enjoying internal stability and economic prosperity.[113][114] The nation was being interconnected through railroad, electric telegraph and steamship lines, uniting it into a single entity.[113] The general opinion, both at home and abroad, was that these accomplishments had been possible for two reasons: "its governance as a monarchy and the character of Pedro II".[113]
Pedro II was neither a British-style figurehead nor an autocrat in the manner of Russian czars. The Emperor exercised power through cooperation with elected politicians, economic interests, and popular support.[115] This interdependence and interaction did much to influence the direction of Pedro II's reign.[116] The Emperor's more notable political successes were achieved due largely to the non-confrontational and cooperative manner with which he approached both issues and the partisan figures with whom he had to deal. He was remarkably tolerant, seldom taking offense at criticism, opposition, or even incompetence.[117] He was diligent in appointing only highly qualified candidates to positions in the government, and sought to curb corruption.[118] He did not have the constitutional authority to force acceptance of his initiatives without support, and his collaborative approach towards governing kept the nation progressing and enabled the political system to successfully function.[119]
The uncertainty of his childhood and exploitation at the hands of others during his youth made the Emperor determined to maintain control over his own destiny. Achieving self-determination required that sufficient power be acquired and maintained.[120] He used his active and essential participation in directing the course of government as a means of influence. His direction became indispensable, although it never devolved into "one-man rule."[121] The Emperor respected the prerogatives of the legislature, even when they resisted, delayed, or thwarted his goals and appointments.[122]
The Brazilian national political system resembled those in other parliamentary nations. The Emperor, as head of state, would ask the leader of either the Conservative or Liberal Party to form a cabinet. The other party formed the opposition in the legislature, a counterweight and check on the party in power. If support for the party in power diminished greatly, or if the cabinet resigned, the Emperor could call on others from either party to form a new government. "In his handling of the two parties, he needed to maintain a reputation for impartiality, work in accord with the popular mood, and avoid any flagrant imposition of his will on the political scene."[123]
The active presence of Pedro II on the political scene was an important part of the government's structure, which also included the cabinet, the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate (the latter two formed the General Assembly). Most politicians appreciated and supported the Emperor's role. Many had lived through the regency period, when the lack of an emperor who could stand above petty and special interests led to years of strife between political factions. Their experiences in public life had created a conviction that the Emperor was "indispensable to Brazil's continued peace and prosperity."[124]
Domestic life
The marriage between Pedro II and Teresa Cristina started off badly. With maturity, patience, and their first child, Afonso, their relationship improved.[107][125] Later Teresa gave birth to more children: Isabel, in 1846; Leopoldina, in 1847; and lastly, Pedro, in 1848.[91][126][127] However, both boys died when very young, which devastated the Emperor.[91][128][129] Beyond suffering as a father, his view of the Empire's future changed completely. Despite his affection for his daughters, he did not believe that Princess Isabel, although his heir, would have any chance of prospering on the throne. He felt his successor needed to be male for the monarchy to be viable.[130] He increasingly saw the Imperial system as being tied so inextricably to himself, that it would not survive him.[131] Isabel and her sister received an exceptional education,[132] although they were given no preparation for governing the nation. Pedro II excluded Isabel from participation in government business and decisions.[133]
Sometime around 1850, Pedro II began having discreet affairs with other women.[134] The most famous and enduring of these relationships involved Luísa Margarida Portugal de Barros, Countess of Barral, with whom he formed a romantic and intimate, though not adulterous, friendship after she was appointed governess to the emperor's daughters in November 1856.[128][135][136] Throughout his life, the Emperor held onto a hope of finding a soulmate, something he felt cheated of[137] due to the necessity of a marriage of state to a woman for whom he never felt passion.[138] This is but one instance illustrating the Emperor's dual identity: who on one hand was "Dom Pedro II" who assiduously carried out his duty in the role of Emperor which destiny had assigned to him, and who on the other hand was "Pedro de Alcântara" who considered the Imperial office an unrewarding burden and who was happier in the worlds of literature and science.[139]
Pedro II was what would today be termed a workaholic, and his routine was demanding. He usually woke up at 7 am and did not sleep before 2 in the morning. His entire day was devoted to the affairs of state and the meager free time available was spent reading and studying.[140] The Emperor went about his daily routine dressed in a simple black tail coat, trousers, and cravat. For special occasions he would wear court dress, and he only appeared in full regalia with crown, mantle and scepter twice each year at the opening and closing of the General Assembly.[141][142]
Pedro II held politicians and government officials to the strict standards which he exemplified..[110] The Emperor demanded politicians work at least an eight hour day and adopted a strict policy for the selection of civil servants based on morality and merit.[143] To set the standard, he lived simply. Balls and assemblies of the Court ceased after 1852.[139][144] He also refused to request or allow the amount of his civil list (Rs 800:000$000 per year, about U.S. $405,000 or £90,000 in 1840[145]) to be raised from 1840, when it represented 3% of the government expenditures, until 1889, when it had fallen to 0.5%.[146][147] He refused luxury,[148][149][150] once explaining: "I also understand that useless expenditure is Nation theft."[151]
Patron of arts and sciences
"I was born to devote myself to culture and sciences", the Emperor remarked in his private journal during 1862.[153][154] He had always been eager to learn and found in books a refuge from the demands of his position.[155][156] His ability to recall passages which he had read in the past was notable.[157][158] Subjects which interested Pedro II were wide-ranging, including anthropology, history, geography, geology, medicine, law, religious studies, philosophy, painting, sculpture, theater, music, chemistry, physics, astronomy, poetry, technology, among others.[159][160] By the end of his reign, there were three libraries in São Cristóvão palace containing more than 60,000 volumes.[161] A passion for linguistics prompted him throughout his life to study new languages, and he was able to speak and write not only Portuguese but also Latin, French, German, English, Italian, Spanish, Greek, Arabic, Hebrew, Sanskrit, Chinese, Occitan and Tupi.[162][163][164][165][166] He became the first Brazilian photographer when he acquired a daguerreotype camera in March 1840.[167][168] He set up one laboratory in São Cristóvão devoted to photography and another to chemistry and physics. He also had an astronomical observatory constructed.[157]
The Emperor's erudition amazed Friedrich Nietzsche when both met.[128][169][170] Victor Hugo told him: "Sire, you are a great citizen, you are the grandson of Marcus Aurelius",[171][172] and Alexandre Herculano called him: "A Prince whom the general opinion holds as the foremost of his era because of his gifted mind, and due to the constant application of that gift to the sciences and culture."[153] He became a member of the Royal Society,[173] the Russian Academy of Sciences,[174] The Royal Academies for Science and the Arts of Belgium[175] and the American Geographical Society.[176] In 1875, he was elected to the French Academy of Sciences, an honor previously granted to only two other heads of state: Peter the Great and Napoleon Bonaparte.[172][177] Pedro II exchanged letters with scientists, philosophers, musicians and other intellectuals. Many of his correspondents became his friends, including Richard Wagner,[178] Louis Pasteur,[179] Louis Agassiz,[180] John Greenleaf Whittier,[181] Michel Eugène Chevreul,[182] Alexander Graham Bell,[183] Henry Wadsworth Longfellow,[184] Arthur de Gobineau,[185] Frédéric Mistral,[186] Alessandro Manzoni,[187] Alexandre Herculano,[188] Camilo Castelo Branco[189] and James Cooley Fletcher.[190]
Pedro II early realized that he had an opportunity to put the knowledge he was accumulating to practical use for Brazil's benefit.[191] The Emperor considered education to be of national importance and was himself a concrete example of the value of learning.[192] He remarked: "Were I not an Emperor, I would like to be a teacher. I do not know of a task more noble than to direct young minds and prepare the men of tomorrow."[193] Education also helped toward his goal to create a sense of Brazilian national identity.[194] His reign saw the creation of the Brazilian Historic and Geographic Institute to promote research and preservation in the historical, geographical, cultural and social sciences.[194] The Imperial Academy of Music and National Opera[195] and the Pedro II School were also founded, the latter serving as a model for schools throughout Brazil.[196] The Imperial Academy of the Fine Arts, established by his father, received further strengthening and support.[197] Using his civil list income, Pedro II provided scholarships for Brazilian students to study at universities, art schools and conservatories of music in Europe.[198][199] He also financed the creation of the Institute Pasteur, helped underwrite the construction of Wagner's Bayreuth Festspielhaus, as well as subscribing to similar projects.[200] His efforts were recognized both at home and abroad. Charles Darwin said of him: "The Emperor does so much for science, that every scientific man is bound to show him the utmost respect".[128][201]
Popularity and clash with the British Empire
At the end of 1859, Pedro II departed on a trip to provinces north of the capital, visiting Espírito Santo, Bahia, Sergipe, Alagoas, Pernambuco and Paraíba. He returned in February 1860 after four months. The trip was a huge success, with the Emperor welcomed everywhere with warmth and joy.[202][203][204]
The first half of the 1860s saw peace and prosperity in Brazil. Civil liberties were maintained.[205][206] Freedom of speech had existed since Brazil's independence[207] and continued to be strongly defended by Pedro II.[208][209] The Emperor found newspapers from the capital and from the provinces an ideal way to keep track of public opinion and the nation's overall situation.[151] Another means of monitoring the Empire was through direct contacts with his subjects. One opportunity for this was during regular Tuesday and Saturday public audiences, where anyone of any social class (including slaves[210]) could gain admittance and present their petitions and stories.[211][212] Visits to schools, colleges, prisons, exhibitions, factories, barracks, and other public appearances presented further opportunities to gather first-hand information.[213]
This tranquility disappeared when the British consul in Rio de Janeiro, William Dougal Christie, nearly sparked a war between his nation and Brazil. Christie, who believed in Gunboat diplomacy,[214] sent an ultimatum containing abusive demands arising out of two minor incidents at the end of 1861 and beginning of 1862. The first was the sinking of a commercial barque on the coast of Rio Grande do Sul after which its goods were pillaged by local inhabitants. The second was the arrest of drunken British officers who were causing a disturbance in the streets of Rio.[214][215][216]
The Brazilian government refused to yield, and Christie issued orders for British warships to capture Brazilian merchant vessels as indemnity.[217][218][219] Brazil's Navy prepared for imminent conflict,[220] purchase of coastal artillery was ordered,[221] several ironclads were authorized[222] and coastal defenses were given permission to fire upon any British warship that tried to capture Brazilian merchant ships.[223] Pedro II was the main reason for Brazil's resistance, he rejected any suggestion of yielding.[224][225] This response came as a surprise to Christie, who changed his tenor and proposed a peaceful settlement through international arbitration.[226][227][228] The Brazilian government presented its demands and, upon seeing the British government's position weaken, severed diplomatic ties with Britain in June 1863.[228][229]
Paraguayan War
Main article: Pedro II of Brazil in the Paraguayan WarSee also: Uruguayan War and Paraguayan WarFirst Fatherland Volunteer
As war with the British Empire threatened, Brazil had to turn its attention to its southern frontiers. Another civil war had begun in Uruguay turning its political parties against each other.[230][231][232] The internal conflict led to the murder of Brazilians and looting of their property in Uruguay.[233] Brazil's government decided to intervene, fearful of giving any impression of weakness in the face of conflict with the British.[234] A Brazilian army invaded Uruguay in December 1864 beginning the brief Uruguayan War, which ended on 20 February 1865.[235][236][237]
Meanwhile, in December 1864 the dictator of Paraguay, Francisco Solano López took advantage of the situation to establish his country as a regional power. The Paraguayan army invaded the Brazilian province of Mato Grosso (currently the state of Mato Grosso do Sul), triggering the Paraguayan War. Four months later, Paraguayan troops invaded Argentine territory as a prelude to an attack upon the Brazilian province of Rio Grande do Sul.[235][238][239]
Aware of the anarchy in Rio Grande do Sul and the incapacity and incompetence of its military chiefs to resist the Paraguayan army, Pedro II decided to go to the front in person.[240] Both the Cabinet and the General Assembly refused to accede to the Emperor's wish.[240] After he also received objections from the Council of State, Pedro II made the memorable pronouncement: "If they can prevent me from going as an Emperor, they cannot prevent me from abdicating and going as a Fatherland Volunteer"—an allusion to those Brazilians who volunteered to go to war and became known throughout the nation as the "Fatherland Volunteers".[240][241][242][243] The monarch himself was popularly called the "Number-one volunteer."[128][244]
Pedro II left for the south in July 1865.[245][246][247] He disembarked in Rio Grande do Sul a few days later and proceeded from there by land.[248] The overland journey was made by horse and wagon, and at night the emperor slept in a campaign tent.[249] Pedro II arrived in Uruguaiana, a Brazilian town occupied by the Paraguayan army, on 11 September. By the time of the Emperor's arrival, the Paraguayan force was besieged.[250][251]
The Emperor rode within rifle-shot of Uruguaiana to demonstrate his courage, but the Paraguayans did not attack him.[253] To avoid further bloodshed, he offered terms of surrender to the Paraguayan commander, which was accepted.[250][254][255] Pedro II's coordination of the military operations and his personal example played a decisive role in successfully repulsing the Paraguayan invasion of Brazilian territory.[256] There was a general belief that the war was near its end and that the surrender of López was imminent.[250][257][258] Before leaving Uruguaiana, he received the British ambassador Edward Thornton, who publicly apologized on behalf of Queen Victoria and the British Government for the crisis between the empires.[254][255] The emperor considered that this diplomatic victory over the most powerful nation of the world was sufficient and renewed friendly relations between the nations.[255] He returned to Rio de Janeiro and was received with huge celebrations.[259]
Conclusion of hostilities
Against all expectations, the war continued for almost five years. During this period, Pedro II's time and energy were devoted to prosecuting the war effort.[260][261] He tirelessly worked to raise and equip troops to reinforce the front lines, and to push forward the fitting of new warships for the navy.[243] At the same time, he worked to prevent quarrels between the national political parties from impairing the military response.[262][263] His refusal to accept any outcome short of total victory over the enemy was pivotal in the final outcome.[264][265] His tenacity was well-paid with the news that López had died in battle on 1 March 1870, bringing the war to a close.[266][267]
More than 50,000 Brazilian soldiers had died,[268] and war costs equalled eleven times the government's annual budget.[269] However, the country was so prosperous, that the government was able to retire the war debt in only ten years.[270][271] The conflict was a stimulus to national production and economic growth.[272] Pedro II turned down the General Assembly's suggestion to erect an equestrian statue of him to commemorate the victory and chose instead to use the money to build elementary schools.[273][274][275][276]
Apogee
Main article: Apogee of Pedro II of BrazilAbolitionist on the throne
The diplomatic victory over the British Empire and the military victory over Uruguay in 1865, followed by a successful conclusion of the war with Paraguay in 1870, ushered in what is considered the "golden age" and apogee of the Brazilian Empire.[277] The 1870s were good times in Brazil, and the Emperor's popularity was greater than ever. Progress was made in both social and political spheres, and all segments of society benefited from the reforms and shared in the increasing prosperity.[278] Brazil's international reputation for political stability and investment potential greatly improved. The Empire was seen as a modern and progressive nation unequalled, with the exception of the United States, in the Americas.[277] The economy began undergoing rapid growth, and immigration flourished. Railroad, shipping and other modernization projects were adopted. "With slavery destined for extinction and other reforms projected, the prospects for 'moral and material advances' seemed vast."[279]
In 1870, few Brazilians opposed slavery and even fewer took an open stand against it. Pedro II was one of the few who did oppose slavery,[280][281] which he considered "a national shame."[282] The Emperor never owned slaves.[281] In 1823, slaves formed 29 percent of Brazil's population, but this figure had fallen to 15.2 percent by 1872.[283] The abolition of slavery was a delicate subject in Brazil. Slaves were used by everyone, from the richest to the poorest.[284][285] Pedro II wanted to end slavery gradually[286][287] to soften the impact to the national economy.[288] He consciously ignored the growing political damage to his image and to the monarchy in consequence of his support for abolition.[289]
The Emperor had no constitutional authority to directly intervene to put an end to slavery.[290] He would need to use all his skills to convince, influence and gather support among politicians to achieve his goal.[291] His first open move against slavery[282] occurred in 1850, when he threatened to abdicate unless the General Assembly declared the Atlantic slave trade illegal.[292]
After the overseas source for supplying new slaves had been eliminated, Pedro II turned his attention in the early 1860s to removing the remaining source: enslavement of children born to slaves.[293][294] Legislation was drafted at his initiative,[293] but the conflict with Paraguay delayed discussion of the proposal in the General Assembly.[294][295] Pedro II openly asked for the gradual eradication of slavery in the Speech from the Throne of 1867.[296] He was heavily criticized, and his move was condemned as "national suicide."[295][297][298] The charge was aired "that abolition was his personal desire and not that of the nation."[299] Eventually, the bill was enacted as the "Law of Free Birth" on 28 September 1871, under which all children born to slave women after that date were considered free-born.[299][300][301]
To Europe and North Africa
On 25 May 1871 Pedro II and his wife traveled to Europe.[302][303] He had long desired to vacation abroad. When news arrived that his younger daughter, the 23-year-old Lepoldina, had died in Vienna of typhoid fever on 7 February, he finally had a pressing reason to venture outside the Empire.[302][304][305] Upon arriving in Lisbon, Portugal, he immediately went to the Janelas Verdes palace, where he met with his stepmother Amélie of Leuchtenberg. The two had not seen each other in forty years, and the meeting was emotional. Pedro II remarked in his journal: "I cried from happiness and also from sorrow seeing my Mother so affectionate toward me but so aged and so sick."[302][306][307]
The Emperor proceeded to visit Spain, Great Britain, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Italy, Egypt, Greece, Switzerland and France. In Coburg he visited his daughter's tomb.[307][308] He found this to be "a time of release and freedom". He traveled under the assumed name "Dom Pedro de Alcântara", insisting upon being treated informally and staying only in hotels.[302][309] He spent his days sightseeing and conversing with scientists and other intellectuals with whom he shared interests.[302][307] The European sojourn proved to be a success, and his demeanor and curiosity won respectful notices in the nations which he visited. The prestige of both Brazil and Pedro II were further enhanced during the tour when news came from Brazil that the Law of Free Birth, abolishing the last source of enslavement, had been ratified. The Imperial party returned to Brazil in triumph on 31 March 1872.[279]
Quarrel with bishops
Soon after returning to Brazil, Pedro II was faced with an unexpected crisis. The clergy had long been understaffed, undisciplined and poorly educated,[310][311] leading to a great loss of respect for the Catholic Church.[310] The Imperial government had embarked upon a program of reform to address these deficiencies.[310] As the Catholic Church was the state religion, the Emperor exercised a great deal of control over Church affairs, paying clerical salaries, appointing parish priests, nominating bishops, ratifying papal bulls, and overseeing seminaries.[310][312] In pursuing reform, the government selected bishops which satisfied its criteria for education, support for reform and moral fitness.[310][311] However, as more capable men began to fill the clerical ranks, resentment of government control over the Church increased.[310][311]
The bishops of Olinda and Pará were two of the new generation of educated, zealous Brazilian clerics. They had been influenced by the Ultramontanism which spread in Catholicism in this period. In 1872 they ordered Freemasons expelled from lay brotherhoods.[313][314][315] While European Masonry often tended towards atheism and anti-clericalism, things were much different in Brazil[313] where membership in Masonic orders was common—although Pedro II himself was not a Freemason.[316] The government tried on two separate occasions to persuade the bishops to repeal, but they refused. This led to them being tried before the Superior Court of Justice and convicted. In 1874, they were sentenced four years at hard labor, although the Emperor commuted this to imprisonment only.[317][318][319] Pedro II played a decisive role by unequivocally backing the government's actions.[320][314][321]
Pedro II was a conscientious adherent of Catholicism, which he viewed as advancing important civilizing and civic values. While meticulously orthodox in matters of doctrine, he felt free to think and behave independently.[322] The Emperor accepted new ideas, such as Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, of which he remarked that "the laws that he [Darwin] has discovered glorify the Creator".[323] He was moderate in his religious beliefs,[324] but could not accept disrespect to civil law and government authority.[314][325] As he told his son-in-law: "[The government] has to ensure that the constitution is obeyed. In these proceedings there is no desire to protect masonry; but rather the goal of upholding the rights of the civilian power."[317] The crisis was resolved in September 1875 after the Emperor agreed to grant full amnesty to the bishops and the Holy See annulled their expulsion orders.[326][319][327] The main consequence of the crisis was that the clergy no longer saw any benefit in upholding Pedro II's throne.[314] Although they abandoned the Emperor, most eagerly awaited the accession of his eldest daughter and heir Isabel because of her ultramontane views.[328]
To the U.S., Europe and Mideast
Once again the Emperor traveled abroad, this time going to the United States. He was accompanied by his faithful servant Rafael, who had raised him from childhood.[329] Pedro II arrived in New York City on 15 April 1876, and set out from there to travel throughout the country; going as far as San Francisco in the west, New Orleans in the south, Washington, D.C., and north to Toronto, Canada.[330][331][332] The trip was "an unalloyed triumph", Pedro II making a deep impression on the American people with his simplicity and kindness.[176][333][334] He then crossed the Atlantic, where he visited Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Russia, Ottoman Empire, Greece, the Holy Land, Egypt, Italy, Austria, Germany, France, Britain, Netherlands, Switzerland and Portugal.[335][336] He returned to Brazil on 22 September 1877.[337]
Pedro II's trips abroad made a deep psychological impact. While traveling, he was largely freed of the restrictions imposed by his office.[338] Under the pseudonym "Pedro de Alcântara", he enjoyed moving about as an ordinary person, even taking a train journey alone with his wife. Only while touring abroad could the Emperor shake off the formal existence and demands of the life he knew in Brazil.[338] It became more difficult to reacclimate to his routine as head of state upon returning.[339] Upon his sons' early deaths, the Emperor's faith in the monarchy's future had evaporated. His trips abroad now made him resentful of the burden destiny had placed upon his shoulders when only a child of five. If he previously had no interest in securing the throne for the next generation, he now had no desire to keep it going during his own lifetime.[340]
Decline and fall
Main article: Decline and fall of Pedro II of BrazilDecadence
During the 1880s, Brazil continued to prosper and social diversity increased markedly, including the first organized push for women's rights.[341] On the other hand, letters written by Pedro II reveal a man grown world-weary with age and having an increasingly alienated and pessimistic outlook.[342] He remained respectful of his duty and was meticulous in performing the tasks demanded of the Imperial office, albeit often without enthusiasm.[343] Because of his increasing "indifference towards the fate of the regime"[344] and his lack of action in support of the Imperial system once it was challenged, historians have attributed the "prime, perhaps sole, responsibility" for the dissolution of the monarchy to the Emperor himself.[345]
After their experience of the perils and obstacles of government, the political figures who had arisen during the 1830s looked to the Emperor as providing a fundamental source of authority essential both for governing and for national survival.[57] These elder statesmen began to die off or retire from government until, by the 1880s, they had almost entirely been replaced by a younger generation of politicians who had no experience of the Regency and early years of Pedro II's reign, when external and internal dangers threatened the nation's existence. They had only known a stable administration and prosperity.[57] In sharp contrast to those of the previous era, the young politicians saw no reason to uphold and defend the Imperial office as a unifying force beneficial to the nation.[346] Pedro II's role in achieving an era of national unity, stability and good government now went unremembered and unconsidered by the ruling elites. By his very success, the emperor had made his position seem unnecessary.[347]
The lack of an heir who could feasibly provide a new direction for the nation also diminished the long-term prospects for continuation of the Brazilian monarchy. The Emperor loved his daughter Isabel, but he considered the idea of a female successor as antithetical to the role required of Brazil's ruler. He viewed the death of his two sons as being a sign that the Empire was destined to be supplanted.[348] Resistance to accepting a female ruler was also shared by the political establishment.[349] Even though the Constitution allowed female succession to the throne, Brazil was still very traditional, and only a male successor was thought capable as head of state.[131]
Republicanism was an elitist creed which never flourished in Brazil,[350][351] with little support in the provinces.[352][353][354] But a serious threat to the monarchy was the combination of republican ideas with the dissemination of Positivism among the army's lower and medium officer ranks, which led to indiscipline among the corps. They dreamed of a dictatorial republic which they believed would be superior to the liberal democratic monarchy.[355][356]
Slavery abolition and revolution
The Emperor's health had considerably worsened[357] and his personal doctors suggested going to Europe for medical treatment.[358] He left on 30 June 1887.[358] While in Milan he passed two weeks between life and death, even being anointed.[359][360][361] While on bed recovering, on 22 May 1888 he received news that slavery had been abolished in Brazil.[362] Lying in bed with a weak voice and tears in his eyes, he said, "Great people! Great people!"[362][363][364] Pedro II returned to Brazil and disembarked in Rio de Janeiro on 22 August 1888.[365][366] The "whole country welcomed him with an enthusiasm never seen before. From the capital, from the provinces, from everywhere, arrived proofs of affection and veneration."[367] With the devotion expressed by Brazilians upon the return of the Emperor and the Empress from Europe, the monarchy seemed to enjoy unshakable support[368] and to be at the height of its popularity."[365][369][370]
The nation enjoyed great international prestige during the final years of the Empire[371] and it had become an emerging power within the international arena.[372] Predictions of economic and labor disruption caused by the abolition of slavery failed to materialize and the 1888 coffee harvest was successful.[373] The end of slavery had resulted in an explicit shift of support to republicanism by rich and powerful coffee farmers who held great political, economic and social power in the country,[374][375] since they regarded emancipation as confiscation of their personal property.[376] To avert a republican backlash, the government exploited the ready credit available to Brazil as a result of its prosperity. It made available massive loans at favorable interest rates to plantation owners and lavishly granted titles and lesser honors to curry favor with influential political figures who had become disaffected.[377] The government also indirectly began to address the problem of the recalcitrant military by revitalizing the moribund National Guard, by then an entity which existed mostly only on paper.[378]
The measures made by the government alarmed the civilian republicans and the Positivists in the military corps. The republicans saw that it would undercut support for their own aims, and were emboldened to further action.[356] The reorganization of the National Guard was begun by the cabinet in August 1889, and the creation of a rival force caused the dissidents among the officer corps to consider desperate steps.[379] For both groups, republicans and military, it had become a case of "now or never".[380] Although there was no desire in Brazil among the majority of the population to change the form of government,[354] republicans began pressuring the Positivist officers to overthrow the monarchy.[381]
The Positivists launched a coup and instituted the republic on 15 November 1889.[382][383][384][385] The few people who witnessed what occurred did not realize that it was a rebellion.[386][387] Historian Lídia Besouchet noted that "[r]arely has a revolution been so minor."[388] During the whole ordeal Pedro II showed no emotion, as if unconcerned about the outcome.[389] He dismissed all suggestions for quelling the rebellion which politicians and military leaders put forward.[390][391][392] When he heard the news of his deposition he simply commented: "If it is so, it will be my retirement. I have worked too hard and I am tired. I will go rest then."[393] He and his family were sent into exile in Europe on 17 November.[394]
Exile and legacy
Last years
Main article: Exile and death of Pedro II of BrazilThere was significant monarchist reaction after the fall of the Empire, which was thoroughly repressed.[395] Riots in protest against the coup occurred, as well as pitched battles between monarchist Army troops and republican militias.[396] The "new regime suppressed with swift brutality and total disdain for civil liberties all attempts to launch a monarchist party or to publish monarchist newspapers."[397] Empress Teresa Cristina died a few days after their arrival in Europe[398][399] and Isabel and her family moved to another place while her father settled in Paris.[400][401] His last couple of years were lonely and melancholic, as he lived in modest hotels without money and writing in his journal of dreams in which he was allowed to return to Brazil.[402][403][404]
One day he took a long drive in an open carriage along the Seine, even though it was very cold. He felt ill after returning to the hotel that evening.[405][406] The illness progressed into pneumonia during the following days.[405][407] Pedro II rapidly declined and died at 00:35 on 5 December 1891[408][409] surrounded by his family.[410] His last words were "May God grant me these last wishes—peace and prosperity for Brazil".[411] While the body was being prepared, a sealed package in the room was found, and next to it a message written by the Emperor himself: "It is soil from my country, I wish it to be placed in my coffin in case I die away from my fatherland."[409][412][413] The package, which contained earth from every Brazilian province, was duly placed inside the coffin.[412][414]
Princess Isabel wished to hold a discreet and private burial ceremony,[415] but she eventually agreed to the French government's request for a State funeral.[409][416][417] On 9 December, thousands of mourners attended the ceremony at La Madeleine. Aside from Pedro II's family, these included: Francis II, former king of the Two Sicilies; Isabella II, former queen of Spain; Philippe, comte de Paris; and other members of European royalty.[418][419] Also present were General Joseph Brugère, representing President Sadi Carnot; the presidents of the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies[416] as well as their members; diplomats; and other representatives of the French government.[420] Nearly all members of the Institut de France were in attendance.[416][421] Other governments from the Americas and Europe also sent representatives, as did distant countries such as Ottoman Turkey, China, Japan and Persia.[420] Following the services, the coffin was taken in procession to the train station to begin its trip to Portugal. Around 300,000[422] people lined the route despite incessant the incessant rain and cold.[423] The journey continued on to the Church of São Vicente de Fora near Lisbon, where the body of Pedro II was interred in the Braganza Pantheon on 12 December.[424][425]
The Brazilian republican government, "fearful of a backlash resulting from the death of the emperor", banned any official reaction.[426] Nevertheless, the Brazilian people were far from indifferent to Pedro II's demise, and "repercussions in Brazil were also immense, despite the government's effort to suppress. There were demonstrations of sorrow throughout the country: shuttered business activity, flags displayed at half-staff, black armbands on clothes, death knells, religious ceremonies."[424][427] Masses were held in memory of Pedro II throughout Brazil, and he and the monarchy were praised in the eulogies that followed.[427]
Legacy
Main article: Legacy of Pedro II of BrazilAfter his fall, Brazilians remained attached to the popular Emperor whom they regarded as a hero[428] and continued to perceive him as a national symbol, the Father of the People personified.[429] This view was even stronger among those of African descent, who equated the monarchy with freedom.[430] The phenomenon of continued support for the deposed monarch is largely credited to a generally held and unextinguished belief that he was a truly "wise, benevolent, austere and honest ruler."[431] The positive view towards Pedro II, and nostalgia for his reign, only grew as the nation quickly fell into a series of economic and political crises which Brazilians attributed to the Emperor's overthrow.[432] He never ceased being a popular hero, and would gradually become, once again, an official hero.[433]
Surprisingly strong feelings of guilt were manifested among republicans, and these became increasingly evident upon the Emperor's death in exile at the end of 1891.[434] They praised Pedro II, who was seen as a model of republican ideals,[435] and the imperial era, which they believed should be regarded as an example to be followed by the young republic.[436] In Brazil, the news of the Emperor's death "aroused a genuine sense of regret among those who, without sympathy for a restoration, acknowledged both the merits and the achievements of their deceased ruler."[428][431][437][438]
His remains, as well of his wife, were finally returned to Brazil in 1921 in time for the centenary of the Brazilian independence in 1922 and the government granted Pedro II dignities befitting a Head of State.[439][440] A national holiday was declared and the return of the Emperor as a national hero[441] was celebrated throughout the country.[435] Thousands attended the main ceremony in Rio de Janeiro. Pedro Calmon describes the scene: "elderly people cried. Many knelt down. All clapped hands. There was no distinction between republicans and monarchists. They were all Brazilians."[442] This homage marked the reconciliation of Republican Brazil with its monarchical past.[440]
Historians have expressed high regard for Pedro II and his reign. The scholarly literature dealing with him is vast and, with the exception of the period immediately after his ouster, overwhelmingly positive, and even laudatory.[443] Emperor Pedro II is usually regarded by historians in Brazil as the greatest Brazilian.[1][444][445] In a manner quite similar to methods which had been used by republicans, historians point to the Emperor's virtues as an example to be followed, although none go so far as to advocate a restoration of the monarchy. Richard Graham notes: "Most twentieth-century historians, moreover, have looked back on the period [of Pedro II's reign] nostalgically, using their descriptions of the Empire to criticize—sometimes subtly, sometimes not—Brazil's subsequent republican or dictatorial regimes."[446]
Titles and honors
Styles of
Pedro II, Emperor of BrazilReference style His Imperial Majesty Spoken style Your Imperial Majesty Alternative style Sire Titles and styles
- 2 December 1825 – 7 April 1831: His Imperial Highness The Prince Imperial
- 7 April 1831 – 15 November 1889: His Imperial Majesty The Emperor
The Emperor's full style and title were "His Imperial Majesty Dom Pedro II, Constitutional Emperor and Perpetual Defender of Brazil".[447]
Honors
Emperor Pedro II was Grand Master of the following Brazilian Orders:
- Order of Christ.[448]
- Order of Saint Benedict of Aviz.[448]
- Order of Saint James of the Sword.[448]
- Order of the Southern Cross.[448]
- Order of Pedro I.[448]
- Order of the Rose.[448]
He was a recipient of the following foreign honors:
- Grand Cross of the Austro-Hungarian Order of Saint Stephen.[449]
- Grand Cordon of the Belgian Order of Leopold.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Romanian Order of the Star.[449]
- Knight of the Danish Order of the Elephant.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Januarius of the Two Sicilies.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Order of Saint Ferdinand and of Merit of the Two Sicilies.[449]
- Grand Cross of the French Légion d'honneur.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Greek Order of the Redeemer.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Dutch Order of the Netherlands Lion.[449]
- Knight of the Spanish Order of the Golden Fleece.[449]
- Stranger Knight of the British Order of the Garter.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Order of Malta.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Sacred Military Constantinian Order of Saint George.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Portuguese Order of the Immaculate Conception of Vila Viçosa.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Portuguese Order of the Tower and Sword.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Prussian Order of the Black Eagle.[449]
- Grand Cross of all Russian orders of chivalry.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Italian Order of the Most Holy Annunciation.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Swedish Royal Order of the Seraphim.[449]
- Grand Cross of the Swedish Order of the Polar Star.[449]
- Grand Cross (First Class) of the Turkish Order of the Medjidie.[449]
Genealogy
Ancestry
The ancestry of Emperor Pedro II:[450]
Ancestors of Pedro II of Brazil 16. John V of Portugal (= 36) 8. Peter III of Portugal 17. Mary Anne of Austria (= 37) 4. John VI of Portugal 18. Joseph I of Portugal 9. Maria I of Portugal 19. Mariana Victoria of Spain 2. Pedro I of Brazil 20. Charles III of Spain 10. Charles IV of Spain 21. Maria Amalia of Saxony 5. Charlotte of Spain 22. Philip, Duke of Parma 11. Maria Luisa of Parma 23. Princess Louise-Élisabeth of France 1. Pedro II of Brazil 24. Francis I, Holy Roman Emperor 12. Leopold II, Holy Roman Emperor 25. Maria Theresa of Austria 6. Francis II, Holy Roman Emperor 26. Charles III of Spain (= 20) 13. Maria Louisa of Spain 27. Maria Amalia of Saxony (= 21) 3. Maria Leopoldina of Austria 28. Charles III of Spain (= 20) 14. Ferdinand I of the Two Sicilies 29. Maria Amalia of Saxony (= 21) 7. Maria Teresa of the Two Sicilies 30. Francis I, Holy Roman Emperor (= 24) 15. Marie Caroline of Austria 31. Maria Theresa of Austria (= 25) Issue
Name Portrait Lifespan Notes By Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies (14 March 1822 – 28 December 1889; married by proxy on 30 May 1843) Afonso, Prince Imperial of Brazil 23 February 1845 –
11 June 1847Prince Imperial of Brazil from birth to his death in 1847. Isabel, Princess Imperial of Brazil 29 July 1846 –
14 November 1921Princess Imperial of Brazil and Countess of Eu through marriage to Gaston d'Orléans. She had 3 sons from this marriage. She also acted as Regent of the Empire while her father was traveling abroad. Princess Leopoldina of Brazil 13 July 1847 –
7 February 1871Married Prince Ludwig August of Saxe-Coburg-Kohary with 4 sons resulting from this marriage. Pedro, Prince Imperial of Brazil 19 July 1848 –
9 January 1850Prince Imperial of Brazil from birth to his death in 1850. Endnotes
- ^ "The Second Reign, that is, the period in which our Emperor was D. Pedro II, lasted fifty-eight years, from the abdication of his father, D. Pedro I, in 1831, until the proclamation of the republic in 1889." —Hélio Viana[444]
Footnotes
- ^ a b c Bueno 2003, p. 196.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 85.
- ^ a b Besouchet 1993, p. 39.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 11–12.
- ^ a b Olivieri 1999, p. 5.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 3.
- ^ a b Schwarcz 1998, p. 45.
- ^ a b c d Vainfas 2002, p. 198.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 4.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 424.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 40.
- ^ a b Schwarcz 1998, p. 47.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 1.
- ^ a b Besouchet 1993, p. 41.
- ^ a b Calmon 1975, p. 5.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 15.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 13.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 16.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 22.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 16.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 46.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 26.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 20.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 21.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 15.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 17.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 50.
- ^ a b c Carvalho 2007, p. 31.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 29.
- ^ a b Calmon 1975, p. 57.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 19.
- ^ a b c Schwarcz 1998, p. 57.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 25.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 33.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 27.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 8.
- ^ a b Vainfas 2002, p. 199.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 56.
- ^ a b Lyra 1977a, p. 50.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 6.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 14.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 46.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 30.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 33.
- ^ a b Besouchet 1993, p. 50.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 9.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 33.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 29.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 39.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 21.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 53.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 37.
- ^ a b Schwarcz 1998, p. 67.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 11.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 67.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 38.
- ^ a b c Barman 1999, p. 317.
- ^ Bueno 2003, pp. 194–195.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 10.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 72.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 39.
- ^ a b Schwarcz 1998, p. 68.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 136.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 70.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 40.
- ^ Bueno 2003, p. 194.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 12.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 73.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 73.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 72.
- ^ a b c Barman 1999, p. 74.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 75.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 66.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 49.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 80.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 93.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 116.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 17.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 203.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, pp. 117–119.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 205.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 51.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 122.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 19.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 123.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 238.
- ^ a b c d e f g Barman 1999, p. 97.
- ^ a b Lyra 1977a, p. 124.
- ^ a b c Calmon 1975, p. 239.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 95.
- ^ a b c d Carvalho 2007, p. 52.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, pp. 125–126.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 240.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 98.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 109.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 9.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 81.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 187.
- ^ a b c Barman 1999, p. 122.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 111.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 111–112.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 114.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 123.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 122–123.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 124.
- ^ a b c Barman 1999, p. 125.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 126.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 102–103.
- ^ Levine 1999, pp. 63–64.
- ^ a b Skidmore 2003, p. 73.
- ^ Bethell 1993, p. 76.
- ^ Graham 1994, p. 71.
- ^ a b c Barman 1999, p. 159.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 100.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 161–162.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 162.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 164.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 163.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 165.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 167.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 178.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 178–179.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 120.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 170.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 73.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 127.
- ^ Vainfas 2002, p. 98.
- ^ a b c d e Vainfas 2002, p. 200.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 129.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 129–130.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 130.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 151.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 152.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 128.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 147–148.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 65.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 148.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 144.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 80.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 134.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 133–134.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, pp. 54–55.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 83.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 53.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 439.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 97.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 51.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 93.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 47.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 38.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 79.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 326.
- ^ a b Lyra 1977b, p. 104.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 77.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 116.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 59.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 117.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 223.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 99.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 542.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 227.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 226.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 7.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 428.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 401.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 103.
- ^ Vasquez 2003, p. 77.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 345.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 230.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1389.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 258.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 172.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 194.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1787.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 94.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 280.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 255.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 185.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 49.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 193.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 238.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 57.
- ^ Gray 2006, pp. 137–138.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 236.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 195.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 196.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 187.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 179.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 200.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 201.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 118.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 118–119.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, pp. 94–95.
- ^ a b Schwarcz 1998, p. 126.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 152.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, pp. 150–151.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 144.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 119.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 99.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 226–228.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 182.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, pp. 200–207.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 138–141.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 188.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 200.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 192.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 515.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 84.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 508.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 27.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 180.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 94.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 184.
- ^ a b Calmon 1975, p. 678.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 27.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 103.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 208.
- ^ Calmon 1975, pp. 678–681.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 104.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 680.
- ^ Doratioto 2002, p. 98.
- ^ Doratioto 2002, p. 203.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 684.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 191.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 209.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 685.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 210.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 105.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 211.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 108.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 219.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 197.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 220.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 107.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 109.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, pp. 224–225.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 198.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 299.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 227.
- ^ a b c Lyra 1977a, p. 228.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 734.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 32.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 202.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 300.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 229.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 735.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 111.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 736.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 112.
- ^ a b c Carvalho 2007, p. 114.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 745.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 124.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 744.
- ^ a b Calmon 1975, p. 748.
- ^ a b c Lyra 1977a, p. 237.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 205.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 239.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 725.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 750.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 193.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 110.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 219–224.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 116–118.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 206.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 114–115.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 229–230.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 121.
- ^ Doratioto 2002, p. 461.
- ^ Doratioto 2002, p. 462.
- ^ Calmon 2002, p. 201.
- ^ Munro 1942, p. 277.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 243.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 855.
- ^ Doratioto 2002, p. 455.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 122.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 230.
- ^ a b Lyra 1977b, p. 9.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 37.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 240.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 189.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 194.
- ^ a b Olivieri 1999, p. 44.
- ^ Vainfas 2002, p. 239.
- ^ Olivieri 1999, p. 43.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 130.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 161.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 131.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 29.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 224–225.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 210.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 132–136.
- ^ Lyra 1977a, p. 166.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 132.
- ^ a b Lyra 1977b, p. 162.
- ^ a b Schwarcz 1998, p. 315.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 134.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 133.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 164.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 136.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 170.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 238.
- ^ a b c d e Barman 1999, p. 236.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 175.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, pp. 172, 174.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 144–145.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 180.
- ^ a b c Carvalho 2007, p. 147.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 237–238.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 146–147.
- ^ a b c d e f Barman 1999, p. 254.
- ^ a b c Carvalho 2007, p. 151.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 150.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, pp. 255–256.
- ^ a b c d Carvalho 2007, p. 153.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, pp. 205–206.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 256.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 257.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 152.
- ^ a b Lyra 1977b, p. 208.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 257–258.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 212.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 253.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 34.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 92.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 213.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 270.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 156.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 155.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 275.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 277–279.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 161–170.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, pp. 227–240.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 169.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 241.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 280–282.
- ^ Lyra 1977b, p. 222.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 286.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 245.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 248.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, pp. 248, 253.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 319.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 298–299.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 299.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 126.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 399.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 318.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. xiv.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 262.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 268.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 349.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 121.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 206.
- ^ Munro 1942, p. 279.
- ^ a b Ermakoff 2006, p. 189.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 195.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 353.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, pp. 53–54.
- ^ a b Lyra 1977c, p. 56.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 199.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, pp. 61–62.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1421.
- ^ a b Lyra 1977c, p. 62.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 442.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1426.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 200.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1438.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 64.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 67.
- ^ Vainfas 2002, p. 201.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 444.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 56.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 306.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 346.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 438.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 190.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 348–349.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 351.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 355.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 356.
- ^ Barman 1999, pp. 353, 356.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 450.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 360.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 104.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 219.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1611.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 459.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 96.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 538.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 361.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 217.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 99.
- ^ Calmon 1975, pp. 1603–1604.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 218.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 220.
- ^ Salles 1996, p. 194.
- ^ Mônaco Janotti 1986, p. 117.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 400.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 234.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 371.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, p. 235.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 377.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 237–238.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 595.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, pp. 156–157.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 238.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 27.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 29.
- ^ Carvalho 2007, pp. 238–239.
- ^ a b c Schwarcz 1998, p. 489.
- ^ Lyra 1977c, p. 165.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 30.
- ^ a b Calmon 1975, p. 1897.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 604.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 606.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 609.
- ^ a b c Carvalho 2007, p. 239.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1896.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1898.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 617.
- ^ a b Besouchet 1993, p. 618.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1899.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1900.
- ^ Besouchet 1993, p. 614.
- ^ a b Carvalho 2007, p. 240.
- ^ Calmon 1975, pp. 1900–1902.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 493.
- ^ a b Mônaco Janotti 1986, p. 50.
- ^ a b Schwarcz 1998, p. 497.
- ^ Martins 2008, p. 66.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 469.
- ^ a b Salles 1996, p. 15.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 496.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 498.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, pp. 495–496.
- ^ a b Schwarcz 1998, p. 508.
- ^ Martins 2008, p. 123.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 402.
- ^ Martins 2008, p. 122–123.
- ^ Calmon 1975, pp. 1914–1915.
- ^ a b Barman 1999, p. 405.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 503.
- ^ Calmon 1975, p. 1915.
- ^ Schwarcz 1998, p. 22.
- ^ a b Viana 1994, p. 467.
- ^ Benevides 1979, p. 61.
- ^ Graham (1994), p. 4.
- ^ Rodrigues 1863, p. 71.
- ^ a b c d e f Barman 1999, p. 11.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Sauer 1889, p. 41.
- ^ Barman 1999, p. 8.
References
- Barman, Roderick J. (1999). Citizen Emperor: Pedro II and the Making of Brazil, 1825–1891. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-3510-7.
- Benevides, José Marijeso de Alencar (1979) (in Portuguese). D. Pedro II, patrono da astronomia brasileira. Fortaleza: Imprensa oficial do Ceará.
- Besouchet, Lídia (1993) (in Portuguese). Pedro II e o Século XIX (2nd ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira. ISBN 85-209-0494-7.
- Bethell, Leslie (1993). Brazil: Empire and Republic, 1822–1930. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-36293-8.
- Bueno, Eduardo (2003) (in Portuguese). Brasil: uma História. São Paulo: Ática. ISBN 85-08-08952-X.
- Calmon, Pedro (1975) (in Portuguese). História de D. Pedro II. 1–5. Rio de Janeiro: J. Olympio.
- Calmon, Pedro (2002) (in Portuguese). História da Civilização Brasileira. Brasília: Senado Federal. OCLC 685131818.
- Carvalho, José Murilo de (2007) (in Portuguese). D. Pedro II: ser ou não ser. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. ISBN 978-85-359-0969-2.
- Doratioto, Francisco (2002) (in Portuguese). Maldita Guerra: Nova história da Guerra do Paraguai. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. ISBN 85-359-0224-4.
- Ermakoff, George (2006) (in Portuguese). Rio de Janeiro – 1840–1900 – Uma crônica fotográfica. Rio de Janeiro: G. Ermakoff Casa Editorial. ISBN 85-98815-05-5.
- Graham, Richard (1994). Patronage and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-2336-2.
- Gray, Charlotte (2006). Reluctant Genius: The Passionate Life and Inventive Mind of Alexander Graham Bell. Toronto: HarperCollins. ISBN 0-00-200676-6.
- Levine, Robert M. (1999). The History of Brazil. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-30390-8.
- Lyra, Heitor (1977a) (in Portuguese). História de Dom Pedro II (1825–1891): Ascenção (1825–1870). 1. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia.
- Lyra, Heitor (1977b) (in Portuguese). História de Dom Pedro II (1825–1891): Fastígio (1870–1880). 2. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia.
- Lyra, Heitor (1977c) (in Portuguese). História de Dom Pedro II (1825–1891): Declínio (1880–1891). 3. Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia.
- Martins, Luís (2008) (in Portuguese). O patriarca e o bacharel (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Alameda. ISBN 978-85-98325-68-2.
- Mônaco Janotti, Maria de Lourdes (1986) (in Portuguese). Os Subversivos da República. São Paulo: Brasiliense.
- Munro, Dana Gardner (1942). The Latin American Republics: A History. New York: D. Appleton.
- Olivieri, Antonio Carlos (1999) (in Portuguese). Dom Pedro II, Imperador do Brasil. São Paulo: Callis. ISBN 85-86797-19-7.
- Rodrigues, José Carlos (1863) (in Portuguese). Constituição política do Império do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Typographia Universal de Laemmert.
- Salles, Ricardo (1996) (in Portuguese). Nostalgia Imperial. Rio de Janeiro: Topbooks. OCLC 36598004.
- Sauer, Arthur (1889) (in Portuguese). Almanak Administrativo, Mercantil e Industrial. Rio de Janeiro: Laemmert & C.. OCLC 36598004.
- Schwarcz, Lilia Moritz (1998) (in Portuguese). As barbas do Imperador: D. Pedro II, um monarca nos trópicos (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. ISBN 85-7164-837-9.
- Skidmore, Thomas E. (2003) (in Portuguese). Uma História do Brasil. São Paulo: Paz e Terra. ISBN 85-219-0313-8.
- Topik, Steven C. (2000). Trade and Gunboats: The United States and Brazil in the Age of Empire. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-4018-6.
- Vainfas, Ronaldo (2002) (in Portuguese). Dicionário do Brasil Imperial. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva. ISBN 85-7302-441-0.
- Vasquez, Pedro Karp (2003) (in Portuguese). O Brasil na fotografia oitocentista. São Paulo: Metalivros. ISBN 85-85371-49-8.
- Viana, Hélio (1994) (in Portuguese). História do Brasil: período colonial, monarquia e república (15th ed.). São Paulo: Melhoramentos. ISBN 85-06-01999-0.
External links
Media related to Pedro II of Brazil at Wikimedia Commons
Pedro II of BrazilCadet branch of the House of AvizBorn: December 2 1825 Died: December 5 1891Regnal titles Preceded by
Pedro IEmperor of Brazil
7 April 1831 – 15 November 1889Monarchy abolished
Brazilian royalty Preceded by
Princess MariaPrince Imperial of Brazil
2 December 1825 – 7 April 1831Succeeded by
Princess MariaTitles in pretence Republic
declared— TITULAR —
Emperor of Brazil
15 November 1889 – 5 December 1891Succeeded by
Princess IsabelEmpire of Brazil General topics Wars Brazilian Independence (1822–1824) · Cisplatine War (1825–1828) · Platine War (1851–1852) · Uruguayan War (1864–1865) · Paraguayan War (1864–1870)Emperors Pedro I · Pedro IIStatesmen José Bonifácio de Andrada · Marquis of Paraná · Viscount of Rio BrancoMilitary Abolitionists The Brazilian Imperial Family Forefathers John VI of Portugal · Queen Carlota (née Infanta of Spain)First generation Emperor Pedro I · Empress Leopoldina (née Archduchess of Austria) · Empress Amélie (née Princess of Leuchtenberg)Second generation Emperor Pedro II · Empress Teresa Cristina (née Princess of Bourbon-Two Sicilies) · Maria II of Portugal · Januária, Princess Imperial and Countess of Aquila · Princess Paula · Francisca, Princess of Joinville · Princess MariaThird generation Afonso, Prince Imperial · Pedro, Prince Imperial · Isabel, Princess Imperial · Prince Gaston of Orléans, Count of Eu · Leopoldina, Princess of Saxe-Coburg-KoharyFourth generation Pedro de Alcântara, Prince of Grão-Pará · Prince Luís · Princess Maria Pia (née Princess of Bourbon-Two Sicilies) · Prince Antônio GastãoConsorts are in italics Forefather 1st Generation Pedro II2nd Generation Afonso, Prince Imperial · Pedro, Prince Imperial3rd Generation Categories:- 1825 births
- 1891 deaths
- 19th-century Brazilian people
- Brazilian monarchs
- Brazilian nobility
- Brazilian people of Austrian descent
- Brazilian people of Portuguese descent
- Princes Imperial of Brazil
- Extra Knights Companion of the Garter
- Fellows of the Royal Society
- Grand Croix of the Légion d'honneur
- House of Braganza
- Knights Grand Cross of the Order of the Immaculate Conception of Vila Viçosa
- Knights of the Golden Fleece
- Leaders ousted by a coup
- Members of the French Academy of Sciences
- Nobility of the Americas
- People from Rio de Janeiro (city)
- People of the Paraguayan War
- Pretenders to the Brazilian throne
- Roman Catholic monarchs
- Royal Fellows of the Royal Society
- Emperors
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.