- Abdominal aortic aneurysm
Abdominal aortic aneurysm Classification and external resources
CT reconstruction image of an abdominal aortic aneurysm
ICD-10 I71.3, I71.4 ICD-9 441.3, 441.4 OMIM 100070 DiseasesDB 792 MedlinePlus 000162 eMedicine med/3443 emerg/27 radio/1 MeSH D017544
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (also known as AAA, pronounced "triple-a") is a localized dilatation (ballooning) of the abdominal aorta exceeding the normal diameter by more than 50 percent, and is the most common form of aortic aneurysm. Approximately 90 percent of abdominal aortic aneurysms occur infrarenally (below the kidneys), but they can also occur pararenally (at the level of the kidneys) or suprarenally (above the kidneys). Such aneurysms can extend to include one or both of the iliac arteries in the pelvis.
Abdominal aortic aneurysms occur most commonly in individuals between 65 and 75 years old and are more common among men and smokers. They tend to cause no symptoms, although occasionally they cause pain in the abdomen and back (due to pressure on surrounding tissues) or in the legs (due to disturbed blood flow). The major complication of abdominal aortic aneurysms is rupture, which is life-threatening, as large amounts of blood spill into the abdominal cavity, and can lead to death within minutes. Mortality in the hospital is 60% to 90%.
Surgery is recommended when the aneurysm is large enough (>5.5 cm in diameter) that the risk of surgery (1% to 6%) is less than the risk of rupture. In open surgery, the surgeon opens the abdomen and stitches in a replacement section of artery; in endovascular surgery the surgeon feeds the replacement section through the patient's artery and replaces it from inside.
There is moderate evidence to support screening in individuals with risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms (e.g., males ≥65).
Abdominal aortic aneurysms are commonly divided according to their size and symptomatology. An aneurysm is usually defined as an outer aortic diameter over 3 cm (normal diameter of the aorta is around 2 cm). If the outer diameter exceeds 5.5 cm, the aneurysm is considered to be large. A ruptured AAA is a clinical diagnosis involving the presence of the triad of abdominal pain, shock and a pulsatile abdominal mass. If these conditions are present, indicating AAA rupture, no further clinical investigations are needed before surgery.
Signs and symptoms
The vast majority of aneurysms are asymptomatic. However, as abdominal aortic aneurysms expand, they may become painful and lead to pulsating sensations in the abdomen or pain in the chest, lower back, or scrotum. The risk of rupture is high in a symptomatic aneurysm, which is therefore considered an indication for surgery. The complications include rupture, peripheral embolization, acute aortic occlusion, and aortocaval (between the aorta and inferior vena cava) or aortoduodenal (between the aorta and the duodenum) fistulae. On physical examination, a palpable abdominal mass can be noted. Bruits can be present in case of renal or visceral arterial stenosis.
The clinical manifestation of ruptured AAA usually includes excruciating pain of the lower back, flank, abdomen and groin. The bleeding usually leads to a hypovolemic shock with hypotension, tachycardia, cyanosis, and altered mental status. The mortality of AAA rupture is up to 90%. 65–75% of patients die before they arrive at hospital and up to 90% die before they reach the operating room. The bleeding can be retroperitoneal or intraperitoneal, or the rupture can create an aortocaval or aortointestinal (between the aorta and intestine) fistula. Flank ecchymosis (appearance of a bruise) is a sign of retroperitoneal hemorrhage, and is also called Grey Turner's sign.
The exact causes of the degenerative process remain unclear. There are, however, some theories and well defined risk factors.
- Tobacco smoking: Greater than 90% of people who develop an AAA have smoked at some point in their life.
- Genetic influences: The influence of genetic factors is highly probable. The high familial prevalence rate is most notable in male individuals. There are many theories about the exact genetic disorder that could cause higher incidence of AAA among male members of the affected families. Some presumed that the influence of alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency could be crucial, some experimental works favored the theory of X-linked mutation, which would explain the lower incidence in heterozygous females. Other theories of genetic etiology have also been formulated. Connective tissue disorders, such as Marfan syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, have also been strongly associated with AAA. Both relapsing polychondritis and pseudoxanthoma elasticum may cause abdominal aortic aneurysm.
- Atherosclerosis: The AAA was long considered to be caused by atherosclerosis, because the walls of the AAA are frequently affected heavily. However, this theory cannot be used to explain the initial defect and the development of occlusion, which is observed in the process.
- Other causes: Other causes of the development of AAA include: infection, trauma, arteritis, cystic medial necrosis (m. Erdheim).
The most striking histopathological changes of aneurysmatic aorta are seen in tunica media and intima. These include accumulation of lipids in foam cells, extracellular free cholesterol crystals, calcifications, thrombosis, and ulcerations and ruptures of the layers. There is an adventitial inflammatory infiltrate. However, the degradation of tunica media by means of proteolytic process seems to be the basic pathophysiologic mechanism of the AAA development. Some researchers report increased expression and activity of matrix metalloproteinases in individuals with AAA. This leads to elimination of elastin from the media, rendering the aortic wall more susceptible to the influence of the blood pressure. There is also a reduced amount of vasa vasorum in the abdominal aorta (compared to the thoracic aorta); consequently, the tunica media must rely mostly on diffusion for nutrition which makes it increasingly susceptible to damage.
Hemodynamics affect the development of AAA. It has a predilection for the infrarenal aorta. The histological structure and mechanical characteristics of infrarenal aorta differ from those of the thoracic aorta. The diameter decreases from the root to the bifurcation, and the wall of the abdominal aorta also contains a lesser proportion of elastin. The mechanical tension in abdominal aortic wall is therefore higher than in the thoracic aortic wall. The elasticity and distensibility also decline with age, which can result in gradual dilatation of the segment. Higher intraluminal pressure in patients with arterial hypertension markedly contributes to the progression of the pathological process. Suitable hemodynamics conditions may be linked to specific Intraluminal Thrombus (ILT) patterns along the aortic lumen, which in turn may affect AAA's development.
An abdominal aortic aneurysm is usually diagnosed by physical exam, ultrasound, or CT. Plain abdominal radiographs may show the outline of an aneurysm when its walls are calcified. However, this is the case in less than half of all aneurysms. Ultrasonography is used to screen for aneurysms and to determine the size of any present. Additionally, free peritoneal fluid can be detected. It is noninvasive and sensitive, but the presence of bowel gas or obesity may limit its usefulness. CT scan has a nearly 100% sensitivity for aneurysm and is also useful in preoperative planning, detailing the anatomy and possibility for endovascular repair. In the case of suspected rupture, it can also reliably detect retroperitoneal fluid. Alternative less often used methods for visualization of the aneurysm include MRI and angiography.
An aneurysm ruptures if the mechanical stress (tension per area) exceeds the local wall strength; consequently, peak wall stress (PWS)  and peak wall rupture risk (PWRR)  have been found to be more reliable parameters than diameter to assess AAA rupture risk. Medical software allows computing these rupture risk indices from standard clinical CT data and provides a patient-specific AAA rupture risk diagnosis.
- Treatment of hypertension
- Smoking cessation
- Low-fat diet
- Screening abdominal ultrasound for men older than 65 years has been shown to reduce mortality, although cost-effectiveness has not been shown.
A clinical practice guideline by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force "recommends one-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by ultrasonography in men age 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked". This is a grade B recommendation. A re-analysis of the meta-analysis estimated a number needed to screen of approximately 850 patients.
- Screening men ages 65–74 years (not restricted to ever smokers). 'Men in whom abdominal aortic aneurysms (> or =3 cm in diameter) were detected were followed-up... Patients with an aortic diameter of 3·0–4·4 cm were rescanned at yearly intervals, whereas those with an aortic diameter of 4·5–5·4 cm were rescanned at 3-monthly intervals ... Surgery was considered on specific criteria (diameter > or =5.5 cm, expansion > or =1 cm per year, symptoms)'.
This trial reported significant short (number needed to screen after 4 years of approximately 590 to prevent nonfatal ruptured AAA plus AAA-related deaths) and long term (number needed to screen after 7 years of approximately 280 to prevent nonfatal ruptured AAA plus AAA-related deaths) benefit and cost effectiveness. Subsequent randomized controlled trials also found benefit:
- number needed to screen after 4 years of 300
- number needed to screen after and after 7 years of 563 (calculation).
In the U.S., effective January 1, 2007, provisions of the SAAAVE Act (Screening Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Very Efficiently) now provide a free, one-time, ultrasound AAA screening benefit for those qualified seniors. Men who have smoked at least 100 cigarettes during their life, and men and women with a family history of AAA qualify for the one-time ultrasound screening. Enrollees must visit their healthcare professional for their Welcome to Medicare physical within six months of enrollment in order to qualify for the free screening. The Welcome to Medicare Physical Exam must be completed within the first six months of Medicare eligibility, but there is no published time limit thereafter for completion of the AAA screening. Providers who perform the physical and order the AAA screening need to document the AAA risk factors.
The treatment options for asymptomatic AAA are conservative management, surveillance with a view to eventual repair, and immediate repair. There are currently two modes of repair available for an AAA: open aneurysm repair (OR), and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). An intervention is often recommended if the aneurysm grows more than 1 cm per year or it is bigger than 5.5 cm. Repair is also indicated for symptomatic aneurysms.
Conservative management is indicated in patients where repair carries a high risk of mortality and in patients where repair is unlikely to improve life expectancy. The mainstay of the conservative treatment is smoking cessation.
Surveillance is indicated in small asymptomatic aneurysms (less than 5.5 cm) where the risk of repair exceeds the risk of rupture. As an AAA grows in diameter the risk of rupture increases. Surveillance until the aneurysm has reached a diameter of 5.5 cm has not been shown to have a higher risk as compared to early intervention.
No medical therapy has been found to be effective at decreasing the growth rate or rupture rate of asymptomatic AAAs. Blood pressure and lipids should however be treated like in any atherosclerotic condition. Studies have suggested possible protective effects of therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, and statins.
Surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm is known as AAA surgery or AAA repair. The threshold for repair varies slightly from individual to individual, depending on the balance of risks and benefits when considering repair versus ongoing surveillance. The size of an individual's native aorta may influence this, along with the presence of comorbidities that increase operative risk or decrease life expectancy.
- Open repair
Open repair is indicated in young patients as an elective procedure, or in growing or large, symptomatic or ruptured aneurysms. It was the main surgical intervention used from the 1950s until other procedures developed.
- Endovascular repair
Endovascular repair first became practical in the 1990s and although it is now an established alternative to open repair, its role is yet to be clearly defined. It is generally indicated in older, high-risk patients or patients unfit for open repair. However, endovascular repair is feasible for only a proportion of AAAs, depending on the morphology of the aneurysm. The main advantages over open repair are that there is less peri-operative mortality, less time in intensive care, less time in hospital overall and earlier return to normal activity. Disadvantages of endovascular repair include a requirement for more frequent ongoing hospital reviews, and a higher chance of further procedures being required. According to the latest studies, the EVAR procedure does not offer any benefit for overall survival or health-related quality of life compared to open surgery, although aneurysm-related mortality is lower. In patients unfit for open repair, EVAR plus conservative management was associated with no benefit, more complications, subsequent procedures and higher costs compared to conservative management alone. Endovascular treatment for paraanastomotic aneurysms after aortobiiliac reconstruction is also a possibility. In 2001 former presidential candidate Bob Dole underwent surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm in which a team of surgeons led by Doctor Kenneth Ouriel inserted a stent graft:
“ Ouriel said that the team inserted a Y-shaped tube through an incision in Dole's leg and placed it inside the weakened portion of the aorta. The aneurysm will eventually contract around the stent, which will remain in place for the rest of Dole's life. -- Associated Press ”
AAA Size (cm) Growth rate (cm/yr) Annual rupture risk (%) 3.0-3.9 0.39 0 4.0-4.9 0.36 0.5-5 5.0-5.9 0.43 3-15 6.0-6.9 0.64 10-20 >=7.0 - 20-50
Although the current standard of determining rupture risk is based on maximum diameter, it is known that smaller AAAs that fall below this threshold (diameter<5.5 cm) may also rupture, and larger AAAs (diameter>5.5 cm) may remain stable. In one report, it was shown that 10–24% of ruptured AAAs were less than 5 cm in diameter. It has also been reported that of 473 non-repaired AAAs examined from autopsy reports, there were 118 cases of rupture, 13% of which were less than 5 cm in diameter. This study also showed that 60% of the AAAs greater than 5 cm (including 54% of those AAAs between 7.1 and 10 cm) never experienced rupture. Vorp et al. later deduced from the findings of Darling et al. that if the maximum diameter criterion were followed for the 473 subjects, only 7% (34/473) of cases would have succumbed to rupture prior to surgical intervention as the diameter was less than 5 cm, with 25% (116/473) of cases possibly undergoing unnecessary surgery since these AAAs may never have ruptured.
Alternative methods of rupture assessment have been recently reported. The majority of these approaches involve the numerical analysis of AAAs using the common engineering technique of the finite element method (FEM) to determine the wall stress distributions. Recent reports have shown that these stress distributions have been shown to correlate to the overall geometry of the AAA rather than solely to the maximum diameter. It is also known that wall stress alone does not completely govern failure as an AAA will usually rupture when the wall stress exceeds the wall strength. In light of this, rupture assessment may be more accurate if both the patient-specific wall stress is coupled together with patient-specific wall strength. A non-invasive method of determining patient-dependent wall strength was recently reported, with more traditional approaches to strength determination via tensile testing performed by other researchers in the field. Some of the more recently proposed AAA rupture-risk assessment methods include: AAA wall stress; AAA expansion rate; degree of asymmetry; presence of intraluminal thrombus (ILT); a rupture potential index (RPI); a finite element analysis rupture index (FEARI); biomechanical factors coupled with computer analysis; growth of ILT; geometrical parameters of the AAA; and also a method of determining AAA growth and rupture based on mathematical models.
The post-operative mortality for an already ruptured AAA has slowly decreased over several decades but remains higher than 40%. However, if the AAA is surgically repaired before rupture, the post-operative mortality rate is substantially lower: approximately 1-6%.
The occurrence of AAA varies markedly by ethnicity. In the United Kingdom the rate of AAA in Caucasian men older than 65 years is about 4.7%, while in Asian men it is 0.45%. It is also uncommon in individuals of African, and Hispanic heritage.
There are 15,000 deaths yearly in the U.S. secondary to AAA rupture. The frequency varies strongly between males and females. The peak incidence is among males around 70 years of age, the prevalence among males over 60 years totals 2-6%. The frequency is much higher in smokers than in non-smokers (8:1), and the risk decreases slowly after smoking cessation. Other risk factors include hypertension and male sex. In the U.S., the incidence of AAA is 2-4% in the adult population. AAA is 4-6 times more common in male siblings of known patients, with a risk of 20-30%.
Rupture of the AAA occurs in 1-3% of men aged 65 or more, the mortality is 70-95%.
The first historical records about AAA are from Ancient Rome in the 2nd century AD, when Greek surgeon Antyllus tried to treat the AAA with proximal and distal ligature, central incision and removal of thrombotic material from the aneurysm. However, attempts to treat the AAA surgically were unsuccessful until 1923. In that year, Rudolph Matas (who also proposed the concept of endoaneurysmorrhaphy), performed the first successful aortic ligation on a human. Other methods that were successful in treating the AAA included wrapping the aorta with polyethene cellophane, which induced fibrosis and restricted the growth of the aneurysm. Albert Einstein was operated on by Rudolf Nissen with use of this technique in 1949, and survived five years after the operation. Endovascular aneurysm repair was first performed in the late 1980s and has been widely adopted in the subsequent decades. Endovascular repair was first used for treating a ruptured aneurysm in Nottingham in 1994
Former presidential candidate Bob Dole had an abdominal aortic aneurysm in 2001 and was treated surgically by vascular surgeon Kenneth Ouriel and the operation was successful. In 1993 Country Music singer Conway Twitty died from AAA.
Risk assessment and experimental models
There have been many calls for alternative approaches to rupture-risk assessment over the past number of years, with many believing that a biomechanics-based approach may be more suitable than the current diameter approach. Numerical modelling is a valuable tool to researchers allowing approximate wall stresses to be calculated, thus revealing the rupture potential of a particular aneurysm. Experimental models are required to validate these numerical results, and provide a further insight into the biomechanical behaviour of the AAA. In vivo, AAAs exhibit a varying range of material strengths from localised weak hypoxic regions to much stronger regions and areas of calcifications. Experimental models can now be manufactured using a novel technique involving the injection-moulding lost-wax manufacturing process to create patient-specific anatomically-correct AAA replicas. Work has also focused on developing more realistic material analogues to those in vivo, and recently a novel range of silicone-rubbers was created allowing the varying material properties of the AAA to be more accurately represented. These rubber models can also be used in a variety of experimental testing from stress analysis using the photoelastic method to deterimining whether the locations of rupture experimentally correlate with those predicted numerically. New endovascular devices are being developed that are able to treat more complex and tortuous anatomies.
Prevention and treatment
A recent animal study published in the journal Nature Medicine showed that removing a single protein prevents early damage in blood vessels from triggering a later-stage, frequently lethal complication of atherosclerosis. By eliminating the gene for a signaling protein called cyclophilin A (CypA) from a strain of mice, researchers were able to provide complete protection against abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
Other recent research, published in the American Journal of Pathology, identified Granzyme B (GZMB) (a protein-degrading enzyme) to be a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Specifically, elimination of this enzyme in mice models — both slowed the progression of aneurysms and improved survival.
With the recent advancements in AAA research, coupled with the increasing collaboration between clinicians and engineers, the future research into AAA rupture-prediction and treatment appears to be in a strong position to combat what is currently ranked as the 13th leading cause of death in the US and the 10th leading cause of death in men over the age of 55 years.
- ^ Upchurch GR, Schaub TA (2006). "Abdominal aortic aneurysm". Am Fam Physician 73 (7): 1198–204. PMID 16623206.
- ^ a b c Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. (September 2006). "ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Associations for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease)—summary of recommendations". J Vasc Interv Radiol 17 (9): 1383–97; quiz 1398. doi:10.1097/01.RVI.0000240426.53079.46. PMID 16990459.
- ^ a b Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW (Apr 2005). "Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial". BMJ 330 (7494): 750. doi:10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.82. PMC 555873. PMID 15757960. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=555873.
- ^ a b Bown MJ, Sutton AJ, Bell PR, Sayers RD (June 2002). "A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair". The British Journal of Surgery 89 (6): 714–30. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02122.x. PMID 12027981.
- ^ Fauci, Anthony (2008-03-06). "242". Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine (17 ed.). McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 0071466339.
- ^ a b c d e f Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm at eMedicine
- ^ Brown LC, Powell JT (September 1999). "Risk Factors for Aneurysm Rupture in Patients Kept Under Ultrasound Surveillance". Annals of Surgery 230 (3): 289–96; discussion 296–7. doi:10.1097/00000658-199909000-00002. PMC 1420874. PMID 10493476. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1420874.
- ^ a b c d e f Treska V. et al.:Aneuryzma břišní aorty, Prague, 1999, ISBN 80-7169-724-9
- ^ a b Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT (January 2008). "Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm". N. Engl. J. Med. 358 (5): 494–501. doi:10.1056/NEJMct0707524. PMID 18234753.
- ^ Clifton MA (Nov 1977). "Familial abdominal aortic aneurysms". Br J Surg. 64 (11): 765–6. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800641102. PMID 588966.
- ^ Rapini, Ronald P.; Bolognia, Jean L.; Jorizzo, Joseph L. (2007). Dermatology: 2-Volume Set. St. Louis: Mosby. ISBN 1-4160-2999-0.
- ^ MacSweeney STR, Powell JT, Greenhalgh RM (1994). "Pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm". The British Journal of Surgery 81 (7): 935–41. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02122.x. PMID 12027981.
- ^ Biasetti J, Hussain F, Gasser TC (2011). "Blood flow and coherent vortices in the normal and aneurysmatic aortas: a fluid dynamical approach to intra-luminal thrombus formation". Journal of the Royal Society Interface 8 (63): 1449. doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0041.
- ^ a b Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, Kennedy FE (April 2003). "Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter". Journal of Vascular Surgery 37 (4): 724–32. doi:10.1067/mva.2003.213. PMID 12663969.
- ^ Gasser TC, Auer M, Labruto F, Swedenborg J, Roy J (2010). "Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: model complexity versus predictability of finite element simulations". Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40 (2): 176–185. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.04.003. PMID 20447844.
- ^ http://www.vascops.com/en/vascops-A4clinics.html
- ^ U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2005). "Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: recommendation statement". Ann. Intern. Med. 142 (3): 198–202. PMID 15684208. http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/142/3/198.
- ^ Fleming C, Whitlock EP, Beil TL, Lederle FA (2005). "Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force". Ann. Intern. Med. 142 (3): 203–11. PMID 15684209. http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/142/3/203. ACP Journal Club
- ^ Recommendation ratings
- ^ Cinà CS, Devereaux PJ (2005). "Review: population-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm reduces cause-specific mortality in older men". ACP J. Club 143 (1): 11. PMID 15989299. http://www.acpjc.org/Content/143/1/issue/ACPJC-2005-143-1-011.htm.
- ^ a b Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, et al. (2002). "The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial". Lancet 360 (9345): 1531–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11522-4. PMID 12443589. ACP Journal Club
- ^ Cina CS (2003). "Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm reduced death from AAA in older men". ACP J. Club 138 (3): 66. PMID 12725621.
- ^ Kim LG, P Scott RA, Ashton HA, Thompson SG (2007). "A sustained mortality benefit from screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm". Ann. Intern. Med. 146 (10): 699–706. PMID 17502630.
- ^ Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group (2002). "Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial". BMJ 325 (7373): 1135. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7373.1135. PMC 133450. PMID 12433761. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=133450. ACP Journal Club
- ^ Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW (2005). "Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial". BMJ 330 (7494): 750. doi:10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.82. PMC 555873. PMID 15757960. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=555873. ACP Journal Club
- ^ Ashton HA, Gao L, Kim LG, Druce PS, Thompson SG, Scott RA (2007). "Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms". The British journal of surgery 94 (6): 696–701. doi:10.1002/bjs.5780. PMID 17514666.
- ^ a b c Ballard DJ, Filardo G, Fowkes G, Powell JT (2008). Ballard, David J. ed. "Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4): CD001835. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001835.pub2. PMID 18843626.
- ^ Powell JT, Brown LC, Forbes JF, et al. (Jun 2007). "Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial". Br J Surg 94 (6): 702–8. doi:10.1002/bjs.5778. PMID 17514693.
- ^ Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, et al. (May 2002). "Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms". N Engl J Med 346 (19): 1437–44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa012573. PMID 12000813. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/346/19/1437.
- ^ Hackam DG, Thiruchelvam D, Redelmeier DA (Aug 2006). "Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and aortic rupture: a population-based case-control study". Lancet 368 (9536): 659–65. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69250-7. PMID 16920471.
- ^ Powell JT, Brown LC, Greenhalgh RM, Thompson SG (Jan 2008). "The rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms: is this modified by anatomical suitability for endovascular repair?". Ann Surg 247 (1): 173–9. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181557d2a. PMID 18156938.
- ^ Rutherford RB (Jun 2006). "Randomized EVAR trials and advent of level i evidence: a paradigm shift in management of large abdominal aortic aneurysms?". Semin Vasc Surg 19 (2): 69–74. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2006.03.001. PMID 16782510.
- ^ Lederle FA, Kane RL, MacDonald R, Wilt TJ (2007). "Systematic review: repair of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm". Ann. Intern. Med. 146 (10): 735–41. PMID 17502634.
- ^ Evar Trial Participants (2005). "Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial". Lancet 365 (9478): 2179–86. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66627-5. PMID 15978925.
- ^ Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, et al. (Jun 2005). "Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms". N Engl J Med 352 (23): 2398–405. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa051255. PMID 15944424. http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/352/23/2398.
- ^ Evar Trial Participants (2005). "Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial". Lancet 365 (9478): 2187–92. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66628-7. PMID 15978926.
- ^ Amato ACA, Kahlberg AK, Bertoglio LB, Melissano GM, Chiesa RC (2008). "Endovascular treatment of a triple paraanastomotic aneurysm after aortobiiliac reconstruction". J Vasc Bras 7 (3): 1–3. doi:10.1590/S1677-54492008000300016. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-54492008000300016&lng=en.
- ^ a b "Bob Dole has surgery to treat aneurysm". USA Today via Associated Press. 2001-06-27. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/june01/2001-06-27-dole.htm. Retrieved 2009-09-22.
- ^ Bernstein EF, Chan EL (September 1984). "Abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk patients. Outcome of selective management based on size and expansion rate". Ann. Surg. 200 (3): 255–63. doi:10.1097/00000658-198409000-00003. PMC 1250467. PMID 6465980. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1250467.
- ^ Brewster DC, Cronenwett JL, Hallett JW, Johnston KW, Krupski WC, Matsumura JS (May 2003). "Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery". J. Vasc. Surg. 37 (5): 1106–17. doi:10.1067/mva.2003.363. PMID 12756363.
- ^ Darling RC, Messina CR, Brewster DC, Ottinger LW (September 1977). "Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection". Circulation 56 (3 Suppl): II161–4. PMID 884821.
- ^ a b Nicholls SC, Gardner JB, Meissner MH, Johansen HK (November 1998). "Rupture in small abdominal aortic aneurysms". Journal of Vascular Surgery 28 (5): 884–8. doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70065-5. PMID 9808857.
- ^ Vorp DA (2007). "BIOMECHANICS OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM". Journal of Biomechanics 40 (9): 1887–902. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.003. PMC 2692528. PMID 17254589. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2692528.
- ^ Vorp DA, Raghavan ML, Webster MW (April 1998). "Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry". Journal of Vascular Surgery 27 (4): 632–9. doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70227-7. PMID 9576075.
- ^ Sacks MS, Vorp DA, Raghavan ML, Federle MP, Webster MW (1999). "In vivo three-dimensional surface geometry of abdominal aortic aneurysms". Annals of Biomedical Engineering 27 (4): 469–79. doi:10.1114/1.202. PMID 10468231.
- ^ a b Doyle BJ, Callanan A, Burke PE, et al. (February 2009). "Vessel Asymmetry as an Additional Diagnostic Tool in the Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms". Journal of Vascular Surgery 49 (2): 443–54. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.064. PMC 2666821. PMID 19028061. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2666821.
- ^ Geest, Vande J.P.; Wang, D.H.J.; Wisniewski, S.R.; Makaroun, M.S.; Vorp, D.A. (2006). "Towards A Noninvasive Method for Determination of Patient-Specific Wall Strength Distribution in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms". Annals of Biomedical Engineering 34 (7): 1098–1106. doi:10.1007/s10439-006-9132-6. PMID 16786395.
- ^ Raghavan ML, Kratzberg J, Castro de Tolosa EM, Hanaoka MM, Walker P, da Silva ES (2006). "Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm". Journal of Biomechanics 39 (16): 3010–6. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.10.021. PMID 16337949.
- ^ Raghavan ML, Webster MW, Vorp DA (1996). "Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: assessment using a new mathematical model". Annals of Biomedical Engineering 24 (5): 573–82. doi:10.1007/BF02684226. PMID 8886238.
- ^ Thubrikar MJ, Labrosse M, Robicsek F, Al-Soudi J, Fowler B (2001). "Mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall". Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology 25 (4): 133–42. doi:10.1080/03091900110057806. PMID 11601439.
- ^ Fillinger MF, Raghavan ML, Marra SP, Cronenwett JL, Kennedy FE (September 2002). "In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk". Journal of Vascular Surgery 36 (3): 589–97. doi:10.1067/mva.2002.125478. PMID 12218986.
- ^ Venkatasubramaniam AK, Fagan MJ, Mehta T, et al. (August 2004). "A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms". European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 28 (2): 168–76. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.03.029. PMID 15234698.
- ^ Hirose Y, Takamiya M (February 1998). "Growth curve of ruptured aortic aneurysm". The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 39 (1): 9–13. PMID 9537528.
- ^ Wang DH, Makaroun MS, Webster MW, Vorp DA (September 2002). "Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm". Journal of Vascular Surgery 36 (3): 598–604. doi:10.1067/mva.2002.126087. PMID 12218961.
- ^ Vorp DA, Vande Geest JP (August 2005). "Biomechanical determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture". Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 25 (8): 1558–66. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000174129.77391.55. PMID 16055757.
- ^ Geest, Vande J.P.; Martino, Di E.S.; Bohra, A.; Makaroun, M.S.; Vorp, D.A. (2006). "A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1085: 11–21. doi:10.1196/annals.1383.046. PMID 17182918.
- ^ Doyle, B.J.; Callanan, A.; Walsh, M.T.; Grace, P.A.; McGloughlin, T.M. (2009). "A finite element analysis rupture index (FEARI) as an additional tool for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture prediction". Vascular Disease Prevention 6: 114–121. doi:10.2174/1567270000906010114.
- ^ Kleinstreuer C, Li Z (2006). "Analysis and computer program for rupture-risk prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysms". Biomedical Engineering Online 5: 19. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-5-19. PMC 1421417. PMID 16529648. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1421417.
- ^ Stenbaek J, Kalin B, Swedenborg J (November 2000). "Growth of thrombus may be a better predictor of rupture than diameter in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms". European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 20 (5): 466–9. doi:10.1053/ejvs.2000.1217. PMID 11112467.
- ^ Giannoglou G, Giannakoulas G, Soulis J, et al. (2006). "Predicting the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms by utilizing various geometrical parameters: revisiting the diameter criterion". Angiology 57 (4): 487–94. doi:10.1177/0003319706290741. PMID 17022385.
- ^ Watton PN, Hill NA, Heil M (November 2004). "A mathematical model for the growth of the abdominal aortic aneurysm". Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 3 (2): 98–113. doi:10.1007/s10237-004-0052-9. PMID 15452732.
- ^ Volokh KY, Vorp DA (2008). "A model of growth and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm". Journal of Biomechanics 41 (5): 1015–21. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.12.014. PMID 18255074.
- ^ Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG (2004). "Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial". Lancet 364 (9437): 843–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16979-1. PMID 15351191.
- ^ Salem MK, Rayt HS, Hussey G, et al. (December 2009). "Should Asian men be included in abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programmes?". Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38 (6): 748–9. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.07.012. PMID 19666232.
- ^ Creager, MA, Halperin, JL, Whittemore, AD (1996). "Aneurysmal disease of the aorta and its branches". In Loscalzo, J, Creager, MA, Dzau, VJ. Vascular Medicine. New York: Little, Brown. p. 901.
- ^ Wilmink TB, Quick CR, Day NE (Dec 1999). "The association between cigarette smoking and abdominal aortic aneurysms". J Vasc Surg 30 (6): 1099–105. doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70049-2. PMID 10587395. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0741521499003870.
- ^ Baird PA, Sadovnick AD, Yee IM, Cole CW, Cole L (Sep 1995). "Sibling risks of abdominal aortic aneurysm". Lancet 346 (8975): 601–4. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91436-6. PMID 7651004.
- ^ Livesay JJ, Messner GN, Vaughn WK (2005). "Milestones in Treatment of Aortic Aneurysm: Denton A. Cooley, MD, and the Texas Heart Institute". Tex Heart Inst J 32 (2): 130–4. PMC 1163455. PMID 16107099. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1163455.
- ^ Famous Patients, Famous Operations, 2002 — Part 3: The Case of the Scientist with a Pulsating Mass from Medscape Surgery
- ^ Yusuf SW, Whitaker SC, Chuter TA, Wenham PW, Hopkinson BR (December 1994). "Emergency endovascular repair of leaking aortic aneurysm". Lancet 344 (8937): 1645. PMID 7984027. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(94)90443-X.
- ^ Raghavan, M.L.; Kratzberg, J.; Tolosa, de E.M.C.; Hanaoka, M.M.; Walter, P.; Silva, da E.S. (2006). "Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm". J. Biomech 39 (16): 3010–3016. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.10.021. PMID 16337949. http://www.jbiomech.com/article/S0021-9290(05)00478-1/abstract.
- ^ Vorp, D.A.; Lee, P.C.; Wang, D.H.J.; Makaroun, M.S.; Nemoto, E.M.; Ogawa, S.; Webster, M.W. (2001). "Association of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm with local hypoxia and wall weakening". Journal of Vascular Surgery 34 (2): 291–299. doi:10.1067/mva.2001.114813. PMID 11496282.
- ^ Speelman, L.; Bohra, A.; Bosboom, E.M.H.; Schurink, G.W.H.; Vosse, van de F.N.; Makaroun, M.S.; Vorp, D.A. (2007). "Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms". Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 129 (1): 105–109. doi:10.1115/1.2401189. PMID 17227104.
- ^ Doyle, B.J.; Morris, L.G.; Callanan, A.; Kelly, P.; Vorp, D.A.; McGloughlin, T.M. (2008). "3D reconstruction and manufacture of real abdominal aortic aneurysms: From CT scan to silicone model". Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 130 (3): 034501. doi:10.1115/1.2907765. PMID 18532870.
- ^ Doyle, B.J.; Corbett, T.J.; Cloonan, A.J.; O'Donnell, M.R.; Walsh, M.T.; Vorp, D.A.; McGloughlin, T.M. (2009). "Experimental mOdelling of Aortic Aneurysms: Novel applications of Silicone Rubbers". Medical Engineering & Physics 31 (8): 1002–1012. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.06.002. PMC 2757445. PMID 19595622. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2757445.
- ^ Morris, L.; O'Donnell, P.; Delassus, P.; McGloughlin, T.M. (2004). "Experimental assessment of stress patterns in abdominal aortic aneurysms using the photoelastic method". Strain 40 (4): 165–172. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1305.2004.tb01425.x. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118763947/abstract.
- ^ Doyle, B.J.; Corbett, T.J.; Callanan, A.; Walsh, M.T.; Vorp, D.A.; McGloughlin, T.M. (2009). "An Experimental and Numerical Comparison of the Rupture Locations of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm". Journal of Endovascular Therapy 16 (3): 322–335. doi:10.1583/09-2697.1. PMC 2795364. PMID 19642790. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2795364.
- ^ Albertini JN, Perdikides T, Soong CV, Hinchliffe RJ, Trojanowska M, Yusuf SW (Jun 2006). "Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with severe angulation of the proximal neck using a flexible stent-graft: European Multicenter Experience". J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 47 (3): 245–50. PMID 16760860. http://www.minervamedica.it/index2.t?show=R37Y2006N03A0245.
- ^ "Study establishes major new treatment target in diseased arteries". U.S. News & World Report. May 10th, 2009. http://www.physorg.com/news161183060.html.
- ^ Chamberlain, C.M.; Ang, L.S.; Boivin, W.A.; Cooper, D.M.; Williams, S. J.; Zhao, H.; Hendel, A.; Folkesson, M. et al. (2010). "Perforin-Independent Extracellular Granzyme B Activity Contributes to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm". Am J Pathol. 176 (2): 1038–1049. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2010.090700. PMC 2808106. PMID 20035050. http://ajp.amjpathol.org/cgi/content/abstract/176/2/1038.
- ^ "Discovery points way for new treatment for aneurysms". University of British Columbia. January 27th, 2010. http://www.hli.ubc.ca/news_events/news.php?user=events&index=1&count=1&date=20100101.
Cardiovascular disease: vascular disease · Circulatory system pathology (I70–I99, 440–456) Arteries, arterioles
Veinsprimarily lower limb (Deep vein thrombosis)abdomen (Hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd–Chiari syndrome, May-Thurner syndrome, Portal vein thrombosis, Renal vein thrombosis)Other Arteries or veins Blood pressure
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.