Commonwealth realm

The Commonwealth realms, shown in blue. Former Commonwealth realms are shown in red.

A Commonwealth realm is a sovereign state within the Commonwealth of Nations that has Elizabeth II as its monarch and head of state.^[1][2] The sixteen current realms have a combined land area of 18.8 million km² (7.3 million mi², excluding Antarctic claims), and a population of 134 million,^[3] of which all, except about two million, live in the six most populous states: the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Papua New Guinea, New Zealand and Jamaica.

Fourteen of the current and all former realms were once British colonies that evolved into independent states, the exceptions being the United Kingdom (UK) itself and Papua New Guinea, which was formed in 1975 as a union of the former German New Guinea — administered by Australia as an international trusteeship before independence — and the former British New Guinea — legally the territory of Papua, administered for the UK by Australia since 1905. The first realms to emerge were colonies that had already previously attained the status of a self-governing Dominion within the British Empire.

For a time, the older term of Dominion was retained to refer to these non-British realms, even though their actual status had changed with the granting of full legislative independence. The word is still sometimes used today, though increasingly rarely, as the word realm was formally introduced with Britain's proclamation of Elizabeth II as queen in 1952 and acquired legal status with the adoption of the modern royal styles and titles by the individual countries.^[1] The qualified term Commonwealth realm is not official, and has not been used in law; rather, it is a term of convenience for distinguishing this group of realms from other countries in the Commonwealth that do not share the same monarch.

Current Commonwealth realms

Country	Pop.[* 1]	Monarchy	Date[* 2]	Queen's Title	Royal Standard
Antigua and Barbuda	0.08	Monarchy of Antigua and Barbuda	1981	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Antigua and Barbuda and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth.	None
Australia	22.75	Monarchy of Australia	1942[* 3]	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth.
The Bahamas	0.35	Monarchy of the Bahamas	1973	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth.	None
Barbados	0.28	Monarchy of Barbados	1966	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Barbados and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth
Belize	0.33	Monarchy of Belize	1981	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Belize and of Her Other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth	None
Canada	34.63	Monarchy of Canada	1931	English: Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith French: Elizabeth Deux, par la grâce de Dieu Reine du Royaume-Uni, du Canada et de ses autres royaumes et territoires, Chef du Commonwealth, Défenseur de la Foi[4]
Grenada	0.11	Monarchy of Grenada	1974	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Grenada and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth	None
Jamaica	2.85	Monarchy of Jamaica	1962	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Jamaica and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth
New Zealand	4.39	Monarchy of New Zealand	1947	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of New Zealand and Her Other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith
Papua New Guinea	6.19	Monarchy of Papua New Guinea	1975	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Papua New Guinea and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth[5]	None
Saint Kitts and Nevis	0.05	Monarchy of Saint Kitts and Nevis	1983	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Saint Christopher and Nevis and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth	None
Saint Lucia	0.17	Monarchy of Saint Lucia	1979	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Saint Lucia and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth	None
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	0.12	Monarchy of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	1979	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth	None
Solomon Islands	0.52	Monarchy of the Solomon Islands	1978	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of the Solomon Islands and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth	None
Tuvalu	0.01	Monarchy of Tuvalu	1978	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Tuvalu and of Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth	None
United Kingdom	62.26	Monarchy of the United Kingdom	n/a[* 4]	Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith
^ In millions. Source: Member state profiles at the Commonwealth of Nations secretariat ^ Dates indicate the year of enactment of the Statute of Westminster (Canada), adoption by realm (Australia and New Zealand), or grant of independence (all others except the UK); the monarch became head of state of the particular realm on this date as a result of one of these events. The monarch had previously been head of state over the same territory by virtue of being monarch of the United Kingdom, or, in the case of Papua New Guinea, monarch of Australia. ^ Adoption of Statute of Westminster was declared retroactive to 1939. ^ A date is not applicable to the United Kingdom as it was the original realm from which other realms became independent.

Under the 1981 Cook Islands constitution, the Queen in Right of New Zealand is head of state of the Cook Islands, but no act passed by the Parliament of New Zealand after 1981 applies in the Cook Islands.^[6] For example, any change in the laws of succession to the New Zealand throne made by New Zealand would have no effect in the Cook Islands unless separately ratified there.

Relationship of the realms

The Commonwealth realms are sovereign states, united only in the voluntary and symmetric sharing of the institution of the monarchy,^[7] the succession, and the Queen herself; the person of the sovereign and the Crown were said in 1936 to be "the most important and vital link" between the realms.^[8] This grouping of countries associated in this manner has been called "an achievement without parallel in the history of international relations or constitutional law."^[9] Terms such as personal union,^{[10][11][12][13][14]} a form of personal union,^{[† 1][16]} and shared monarchy, amongst others,^{[† 2][19]} have all been advanced as definitions since the beginning of the Commonwealth itself, though there has been no agreement on which term is most accurate,^[18][19] or even whether personal union is applicable at all.^{[† 3][21]} The United Kingdom no longer holds any legislative power over any country besides itself, although some countries continue to use, by their own volition, the Judicial Committee of the British Privy Council as part of their own judiciary; usually as the highest court of appeal.

Conflicts of interest have arisen from this relationship amongst independent states, ranging from minor diplomatic matters — such as the monarch expressing on the advice of one of her cabinets views that counter those of another of her cabinets^{[† 4]} — to more serious conflicts regarding matters of armed conflict, wherein the monarch may be simultaneously at war and at peace with himself as head of two hostile nations.^{[† 5]} In such cases, viceroys have tended to act in manners that avoid placing the sovereign directly in the centre of the conflict, meaning that a governor-general may have to take controversial actions entirely on his or her own initiative through the exercise of the reserve powers.^{[† 6]}

The Crown in the Commonwealth realms

Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, pose at Windsor Castle with the Queen's fifteen governors-general in 2002^{[† 7]}

Elizabeth II as Queen of New Zealand, wearing the sash and star of the New Zealand Order of Merit as well as the Sovereign's insignia of the Order of New Zealand and Queen's Service Order

The evolution of the Commonwealth realms has led to the scenario wherein the Crown has both a separate and a shared character; it is a singular institution with one sovereign, but also simultaneously operates separately within each country, with the Queen being equally a part of each state and acting in right of a particular realm as a distinct legal person guided only by the advice of the cabinet of that jurisdiction.^{[24][25][26][27][28][29][30]} This means that in different contexts the term Crown may refer to the extra-national institution shared amongst all 16 countries, or to the Crown in each realm considered separately.^{[† 8]} However, though the monarchy is therefore no longer an exclusively British institution,^[24][30] having become "domesticated" in each of the realms,^[31] it may in the media and legal fields often still be elaborated as the British Crown for reasons historical, of convenience, or political, regardless of the different, specific, and official national titles and terms used when addressing the Queen of the citizenry in each jurisdiction; for example, in Barbados the Queen is titled as Elizabeth II, Queen of Barbados, or simply the Queen of Barbados, with her full title making mention of her position as queen of the other Commonwealth realms. To guarantee the continuity of this arrangement, the preamble of the 1931 Statute of Westminster stipulates that any alteration to the line of succession in any one country must be voluntarily approved by the parliaments of all the realms,^{[32][† 9][34]} or, alternatively, a realm may choose to end its participation in the shared monarchy.

From a cultural standpoint, the shared nature of the Crown is less clear. In all realms, the sovereign's name and image and other royal symbols unique to each nation are visible in the emblems and insignia of governmental institutions and militia, leading to the argument that the Crown as a shared link between the Commonwealth realms, with the Crown in right of each country having unique domestic characteristics. The Queen's effigy, for example, appears on coins and banknotes in some countries, and an oath of allegiance to the Queen is usually required from politicians, judges, military members and new citizens. It is also asserted, however, that the Crown throughout the realms remains essentially British and primarily of the United Kingdom, despite the legal and cultural evolution of the Commonwealth since the 1930s. Indeed, by 1959 it was being asserted by Buckingham Palace officials that the Queen was "equally at home in all her realms."^[35]

Monarch's role in the realms

The monarch is, in theory, the supreme governor of each of the Commonwealth realms, charged with issuing executive orders, commanding the military forces, and creating and administering laws. However, each country now operates under the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy and the concept of responsible government, meaning that the monarch only exercises her powers on the advice of her Crown ministers, who are usually drawn from, and thus responsible to, the elected lower house of the relevant parliament.

While this remains the case for all the Commonwealth realms, their sovereign resides predominantly in her oldest realm, the United Kingdom, and thus carries out her duties there mostly in person. In the other realms, the Queen normally exercises only those powers related to the appointment of her viceroys (a governor-general in all cases, and a governor in each of the Australian states), usually on the advice of the prime minister of the country or state concerned, though this process may have additional requirements.^{[† 10]} In certain other cases, the extent to which varies from realm to realm, specific additional powers are reserved exclusively for the monarch — such as the appointment of extra senators to the Canadian Senate, the creation of honours, or the issuance of letters patent — and on occasions of national importance, the Queen may be advised to perform in person her constitutional duties, such as granting Royal Assent or issuing a royal proclamation. Otherwise, all royal powers, including the Royal Prerogative, are carried out on behalf of the sovereign by the relevant viceroy, which, apart from those already mentioned, include a lieutenant governor in each province of Canada (appointed by the Governor General of Canada) and the Queen's Representative in the Cook Islands, who is appointed by the Queen herself.^[36] In the United Kingdom, the Queen appoints Counsellors of State to perform her constitutional duties in her absence.

Similarly, the monarch or other members of the Royal Family will perform ceremonial duties in the Commonwealth realms to mark historically significant events.^[37] They do so most frequently in the United Kingdom, and in the other countries during tours at least once every five or six years, meaning the Queen is present in a number of her dominions outside the UK, or acting on behalf of those realms abroad, approximately every other year.

Citizens in Commonwealth realms or British overseas territories may request birthday or wedding anniversary messages to be sent from the Sovereign.^[38] This is available for 100th, 110th, and beyond for birthdays; and 60th ("Diamond"), 65th, 70th ("Platinum"), and beyond for wedding anniversaries.^[38]

Religious role of the monarch

The sovereign's religious role differs from country to country. In all realms the Queen is sovereign "By the Grace of God", a phrase that forms a part of her official title within those states. In Canada, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand, "Defender of the Faith" (in Latin: fidei defensor) — the ancient phrase first granted in 1521 by Pope Leo X to King Henry VIII — is also included as a part of the royal title and the sovereign is anointed as such in the only coronation that takes place in any of the realms,^[39] a ceremony in the context of a church service imbued with theological and constitutional symbolism and meaning, held at Westminster Abbey in London, United Kingdom.

However, it is solely in the United Kingdom that the Queen actually plays a role in organised religion. In England, she acts as the Supreme Governor of the Church of England and appoints its bishops and archbishops who thereafter act as her Lords Spiritual. In Scotland, she swears an oath to uphold and protect the Church of Scotland and sends to meetings of the church's General Assembly a Lord High Commissioner as her representative, when she is not personally in attendance.^[40] Unusually for the Church of Scotland, Glasgow and Dunblane Cathedrals are both owned by the British Crown,^{[citation needed]} though they are not like the Chapels Royal, which exist in both the United Kingdom and Canada and form a part of the Ecclesiastical Household in those two countries. In England and Scotland, these chapels are Royal Peculiars, and fall directly within the jurisdiction of the British monarch, as opposed to a diocese, as is the norm.^{[citation needed]} To them, the Queen may also appoint her own chaplains from either the Church of England or of Scotland.

Royal family

As with the sovereign, a single royal family is shared by the Commonwealth realms, similarly being most frequently referred to in a casual fashion as the British Royal Family, sometimes causing conflict with official national titles, such as in Canada. Though there is no strict legal or formal definition of who is or is not a member of the Royal Family, the group is loosely defined as the extended family of the monarch. These persons constitute the apex of a modern royal court, regularly performing public duties at hundreds of events throughout the 16 realms each year. For this work, the Royal Family members receive no salary from any state; instead, only the expenses incurred for each event (security, transportation, venue, etc.) are, due to the nature of the Crown in the realms, funded by the relevant state individually through the ordinary legislative budgeting process. These engagements are organised in order for the Crown to honour, encourage, and learn about the achievements or endeavours of individuals, institutions, and enterprises in a variety of areas of the lives of the Queen's subjects. As representatives of the monarch, Royal Family members often also join the nation in commemorating historical events, holidays, and celebratory and tragic occurrences, as well as sponsoring or participating in numerous charitable, cultural, and social activities. Their work, which is all formally recorded in the Court Circular, draws public attention to amicable relations within and between the nations of the Commonwealth and beyond; the members of the Royal Family draw enormous media coverage in the form of photographic, written, and televised commentary on not only their activities and public roles, but also family relationships, rites of passage, personalities, attire, and behaviour.

Flags

The Personal Flag of Queen Elizabeth II, used in a general capacity within the Commonwealth

The Queen employs various royal standards to mark her presence, the particular one used depending on which realm she is in or acting on behalf of at the time. There are currently unique flags for Australia, Barbados, Canada, Jamaica, New Zealand, and two variations for the United Kingdom — one for Scotland and another for the rest of the country. All are heraldic banners displaying the shield of the sovereign's coat of arms for that state, and each, save for those of the UK, are defaced in the centre with the Queen's Personal Flag, a crowned E for Elizabeth surrounded by a garland of roses representing the countries of the Commonwealth. This latter flag on its own is used for realms that do not have a unique personal standard for the monarch, as well as for general use in representing the Queen as Head of the Commonwealth. The monarch previously held royal standards for Sierra Leone, Mauritius, Malta, and Trinidad and Tobago, but these banners became obsolete when the countries became republics.

The governors-general throughout the Commonwealth realms also each use a personal flag, which, like that of the sovereign, passes to each successive occupant of the office. Most feature a lion passant atop a St. Edward's royal crown with the name of the country across a scroll underneath, all on a blue background. The two exceptions are those of, since 1981, Canada (bearing on a blue background the crest of the Royal Coat of Arms of Canada) and, since 2008, New Zealand (a St. Edward's Crown above the shield of the Coat of Arms of New Zealand). The lieutenant governors of the Canadian provinces each have their own personal standards, as do the governors of the Australian states.

Historical development

Dominions emerge

The possibility that a colony within the British Empire might become a new kingdom was first mooted in the 1860s, when it was proposed that the British North American territories of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and the Province of Canada unite as a confederation that might be known as the Kingdom of Canada.^[41][42][43] In light of geo-political circumstances at the time, however, the name was abandoned in favour of the Dominion of Canada.^{[† 11]} As more British colonies followed Canada in gaining legislative independence from the United Kingdom, Prime Minister of Canada Wilfrid Laurier was led to insist at the 1907 Imperial Conference that a formula be created to differentiate between the Crown and the self-governing colonies. For the latter the Canadian precedent was followed, and the term Dominion was extended to apply to Australia, New Zealand, Newfoundland, and the colonies of the Cape, Natal, and Transvaal, before and after they merged in 1910 with the Orange River Colony to form the Union of South Africa. These countries were joined in 1921 by the Irish Free State.

A compiled portrait of the main delegates to the signing of the Treaty of Versailles; The Canadian delegate George Eulas Foster stands fourth from left

King George V with his prime ministers at the Imperial Conference of 1926^{[† 12]}

Although the Dominions were capable of governing themselves internally, they technically remained — especially in regards to foreign policy and defence — subject to British authority, wherein the governor-general of each Dominion represented the British monarch-in-Council reigning over these territories as a single imperial domain. It was commonly held in some circles that the Crown was a monolithic element throughout all the monarch's territories; A.H. Lefroy wrote in 1918 that "the Crown is to be considered as one and indivisible throughout the Empire; and cannot be severed into as many kingships as there are Dominions, and self-governing colonies."^[44] This unitary model began to erode, however, when the Dominions gained more international prominence as a result of their participation and sacrifice in the First World War, in 1919 prompting Canadian prime minister Robert Borden and South African minister of defence Jan Smuts to demand that the Dominions be given at the Versailles Conference full recognition as "autonomous nations of an Imperial Commonwealth." The immediate result was that, though the King signed as High Contracting Party for the empire as a whole,^[45] the Dominions were also separate signatories to the Treaty of Versailles, as well as, together with India, founding members of the League of Nations.

The pace of independence thereafter increased, with Canada exchanging envoys with the United States the following year and in 1923 concluding in its own right the Halibut Fisheries Treaty,^[45] Prime Minister of the United Kingdom David Lloyd George stating in 1921 that the "British Dominions have now been accepted fully into the community of nations,"^[46] and, by 1925, the Dominions felt confident enough to refuse to be bound by Britain's adherence to the Treaty of Locarno. This, combined with a realisation that the Crown was already operating distinctly and separately within each of the jurisdictions of the Canadian provinces and Australian states,^{[† 13][48][45]} appeared to put to rest previous assertions that the Crown could never be divided amongst the Dominions.

Between the wars

Another catalyst for change came in 1926, when then Governor General of Canada the Lord Byng of Vimy refused the advice of his prime minister (William Lyon Mackenzie King) in what came to be known colloquially as the King–Byng Affair.^[49] Mackenzie King, after resigning and then being reappointed as prime minister some months later, pushed at the Imperial Conference of 1926 for a reorganisation of the way the Dominions related to the British government, resulting in the Balfour Declaration, which declared formally that the Dominions were fully autonomous and equal in status to the United Kingdom.^[50] What this meant in practice was not at the time worked out; conflicting views existed, some in the United Kingdom not wishing to see a fracturing of the sacred unity of the Crown throughout the empire, and some in the Dominions not wishing to see their jurisdiction have to take on the full brunt of diplomatic and military responsibilities.^[31]

What did follow was that the Dominion governments gained a separate and direct relationship with the monarch, without the British Cabinet acting as an intermediary, and the governors-general now acted solely as a personal representative of the sovereign in right of that Dominion.^{[† 14]} Though no formal mechanism for tendering advice to the monarch had yet been established — former Prime Minister of Australia William Hughes theorised that the Dominion cabinets would provide informal direction and the British Cabinet would offer formal advice^[52] — the concepts were first put into legal practice with the passage in 1927 of the Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act, which implicitly recognised the Irish Free State as separate from the UK, and the King as king of each Dominion uniquely, rather than as the British king in each Dominion. At the same time, terminology in foreign relations was altered to demonstrate the independent status of the Dominions, such as the dropping of the term "Britannic" from the King's style outside of the United Kingdom.^[53] Then, in 1930 George V's Australian ministers employed a practice adopted by resolution at that year's Imperial Conference,^[45] directly advising the King to appoint Isaac Isaacs as his Australian governor-general, against the preferences of the British government.

These new developments were explicitly codified in 1931 with the passage of the Statute of Westminster, through which Canada, the Union of South Africa, and the Irish Free State all immediately obtained formal legislative independence from the UK, while in the other Dominions' adoption of the statute was subject to ratification by the Dominion's parliament. Australia and New Zealand did so in 1942 and 1947, respectively, with the former's ratification back-dated to 1939, and, though originally covered by it, Newfoundland never ratified the bill and reverted to direct British rule in 1934. What resulted was the inability for the parliament at Westminster to legislate for any Dominion unless requested to do so. Further, the Judicial Committee of the British Privy Council was left available as the last court of appeal for some Dominions.^[54] This was all met with only minor trepidation either before or at the time,^{[† 15]} and the government of Ireland was confident that the relationship of these independent countries under the Crown would function as a personal union,^[16] akin to that which had earlier existed between the United Kingdom and Hanover (1801 to 1837), or between England and Scotland (1603 to 1707). The civil division of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales later found in 1982 that the British parliament could have legislated for a Dominion simply by including in any new law a clause claiming the Dominion cabinet had requested and approved of the act, whether that was true or not.^[56] Further, the British parliament was not obliged to fulfill a Dominion's request for legislative change. However, the words in the Statute of Westminster became written expression of a conventional rule that developed whereby British law would not extend beyond the borders of the United Kingdom unless a Dominion supplicated otherwise.^[45] By 1937, the Appeal Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa ruled unanimously that a repeal of the Statute of Westminster in the United Kingdom would have no effect in South Africa, stating: "We cannot take this argument seriously. Freedom once conferred cannot be revoked."^[57] Others in Canada upheld the same position.^[45]

The first prominent example of this arrangement working in practice came with the abdication of King Edward VIII in 1936,^[45] for which it was necessary to gain the approval of all the Dominions of the Commonwealth before the resignation could take place;^[58] Canada, the Union of South Africa, and the Irish Free State even passed unique legislation to solidify the changes in succession within their jurisdictions.^{[† 16]} Following the accession of Edward's brother, George VI, to the throne, the United Kingdom created legislation that would provide for a regency in the event of the incapacitation of the monarch. Though input was sought from the Dominions on this matter, all declined to make themselves bound by the British legislation, feeling instead that the governors-general could carry out royal functions in place of a debilitated sovereign.^[60]

The prime ministers of five Commonwealth countries at the 1944 Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Conference; from left to right: William Lyon Mackenzie King (Canada), Jan Smuts (South Africa), Winston Churchill (United Kingdom), Peter Fraser (New Zealand), and John Curtin (Australia)

During his tenure as Governor General of Canada, the Lord Tweedsmuir urged the organisation of a royal tour of the country by King George VI, so that he might not only appear in person before his people, but also personally perform constitutional duties and pay a state visit to the United States as king of Canada.^[61] While the idea was embraced in Canada as a way to "translate the Statute of Westminster into the actualities of a tour," throughout the planning of the trip that took place in 1939, the British authorities resisted at numerous points the idea that the King be attended by his Canadian ministers instead of his British ones.^[62] The Canadian prime minister (still Mackenzie King) was ultimately successful, however, in being the minister in attendance, and the King did in public throughout the trip ultimately act solely in his capacity as the Canadian monarch. Yet, the international status of the Crown was also illustrated by George VI simultaneously bolstering from both Canada and the United States support for the UK in the looming war with Nazi Germany.^[61]

When this threat became reality, there was some uncertainty in the Dominions about the ramifications of Britain's declaration of war against Adolf Hitler. Australia and New Zealand had not yet ratified the Statute of Westminster; the Australian prime minister, Robert Menzies, considered the government bound by the British declaration of war,^[63][64] while New Zealand coordinated a declaration of war to be made simultaneously with Britain's.^[65] As late as 1937, some scholars were still of the mind that, when it came to declarations of war, if the King signed, he did so as king of the empire as a whole; at that time, W. Kennedy wrote: "in the final test of sovereignty — that of war — Canada is not a sovereign state... and it remains as true in 1937 as it was in 1914 that when the Crown is at war, Canada is legally at war,"^[66] and, one year later, A. Berriedale Keith argued that "issues of war or neutrality still are decided on the final authority of the British Cabinet."^[67] In 1939, however, Canada and South Africa made separate proclamations of war against Germany a few days after the UK's. Their example was followed more consistently by the other realms as further war was declared against Italy, Rumania, Hungary, Finland, and Japan.^[45] At the war's end, it was said by F.R. Scott that "it is firmly established as a basic constitutional principle that, so far as relates to Canada, the King is regulated by Canadian law and must act only on the advice and responsibility of Canadian ministers."^[68]

Post-war evolution

Once the Second World War was over, India and Ceylon became independent Dominions of the Commonwealth, though it was made clear at the time that India would soon move to a republican form of government. Unlike Ireland and Burma at the time of their becoming republics, however, there was no desire on the part of India to give up its membership in the British Commonwealth, prompting a Commonwealth Conference and the issuance of the London Declaration in 1949, which entrenched the idea of Canadian prime minister Louis St. Laurent that different royal houses and republics be allowed in the Commonwealth so long as they recognised as the international organisation's symbolic head the shared sovereign of the UK and the Dominions.^[69] At approximately the same time, the tabling in 1946 of the Canadian parliament's Canadian Citizenship Act brought into question the homogeneity of the King's subjects, which, prior to that year, was uniformly defined in terms of allegiance to the sovereign, without regard to the individual's country of residence. Following negotiations, it was decided in 1947 that each Commonwealth member was free to pass its own citizenship legislation, so that its citizens owed allegiance only to the monarch in right of that country.

Princess Elizabeth, Duchess of Edinburgh and Philip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh, on a tour of Canada, 3 November 1951

As these constitutional developments were taking place, the Dominion and British governments became increasingly concerned with how to represent the more commonly accepted notion that there was no distinction between the sovereign's role in the UK and his or her position in any of the Dominions, as summed up in Patrick Gordon Walker's statement in the British House of Commons: "We in this country have to abandon... any sense of property in the Crown. The Queen, now, clearly, explicitly and according to title, belongs equally to all her realms and to the Commonwealth as a whole."^[24] Thus, at the 1948 Prime Ministers' Conference the term Dominion was avoided in favour of Commonwealth country, in order to avoid the subordination implied by the older designation. Then, with the British proclamation of Elizabeth II's accession to the throne in 1952, the phrases Commonwealth realm and Head of the Commonwealth became established, deriving from the words that declared the monarch as "of this Realm, and of her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth." The Commonwealth realms' prime ministers thereafter discussed the matter of the new monarch's title, with St. Laurent stating at the 1953 Commonwealth Conference that it was important to agree on a format that would "emphasise the fact that the Queen is Queen of Canada, regardless of her sovereignty over other Commonwealth countries."^[25] The result was a new Royal Style and Titles Act being passed in each of the seven realms then existing (excluding Pakistan), which all identically gave formal recognition to the separateness and equality of the countries involved, and replaced the phrase "British Dominions Beyond the Seas" with "Her Other Realms and Territories", the latter using the medieval French word realm (from royaume) in place of dominion. Further, at her coronation, Elizabeth II's oath contained a provision requiring her to promise to govern according to the rules and customs of the realms, naming each one separately.

Princess Alexandra represents her cousin, Queen Elizabeth II, at the opening of the newly created realm of Nigeria's federal parliament, 3 October 1960

In the same period, Walker also suggested to the British parliament that the Queen should annually spend an equal amount of time in each of her realms. The Lord Altrincham, who in 1957 criticised Queen Elizabeth II for having a court that encompassed mostly Britain and not the Commonwealth as a whole,^[70] was in favour of the idea, but it did not attract wide support.^[71] Another thought rasied was that viceregal appointments should become trans-Commonwealth; the Governor-General of Australia would be someone from South Africa, the Governor-General of Ceylon would come from New Zealand, and so on. The prime ministers of Canada and Australia, John Diefenbaker and Robert Menzies, respectively, were sympathetic to the concept, but, again, it was never put into practice.^[72]

The principle of fully separate and equal realms was followed in all future grants of independence, including those that came through the winds of change that swept through Africa in the 1960s, the collapse of the Federation of the West Indies in 1961, and at later dates. In post-colonial Africa, within a few years of their founding the realms drafted new constitutions in order to come under a different royal house or become republics within the Commonwealth; South Africa was the only exception, having been a Dominion and then a realm for 54 years before becoming a republic in 1961. The white minority government of Rhodesia in 1965 issued its unilateral declaration of independence, and its members affirmed their loyalty to Elizabeth II as Queen of Rhodesia, a title to which she had not consented, did not accept, and was not recognised internationally. Her representative in the colony, Sir Humphrey Gibbs, immediately dismissed his prime minister, Ian Smith, but this action was ignored by Smith and he appointed, without the Queen's consent, an Officer Administrating the Government to perform the governor's constitutional duties until 1970, when Smith's government declared Rhodesia a republic. When Papua New Guinea became independent of Australia in 1975, this was the first (and so far the last) time a Commonwealth realm was created from a territory that had never been made up of British colonies in its entirety. The country to most recently become a Commonwealth realm was Saint Kitts and Nevis, achieving the status in 1983. At the same time, in other Commonwealth realms, including the United Kingdom, movements emerged advocating a republican government in place of constitutional monarchy; they were, and continue to be, countered by monarchist leagues that support the existing system and/or celebrate the historical and modern connections the shared monarchy provides.

Queen Elizabeth II, on 6 July 2010, addressed the United Nations in New York City as queen of all 16 Commonwealth realms.^[73]

Former Commonwealth realms

Country[‡ 1]	Dates	Original system	Method	Royal Standard
Ceylon[‡ 2]	1948 – 1972	Parliamentary republic	New constitution
Fiji	1970 – 1987	Parliamentary republic	Military coup
Gambia	1965 – 1970	Presidential republic	Referendum
Ghana	1957 – 1960	Presidential republic	Referendum
Guyana	1966 – 1970	Parliamentary republic	Constitutional amendment
India	1947 – 1950	Parliamentary republic	New constitution
Ireland	1931 – 1949	Parliamentary republic	Act of parliament[‡ 3]
Kenya	1963 – 1964	Presidential republic	New constitution
Malawi	1964 – 1966	Single-party republic	New constitution
Malta	1964 – 1974	Parliamentary republic	Constitutional amendment
Mauritius	1968 – 1992	Parliamentary republic	Constitutional amendment
Nigeria	1960 – 1963	Parliamentary republic	Constitutional amendment
Pakistan	1947 – 1956	Parliamentary republic	New constitution
Sierra Leone	1961 – 1971	Presidential republic	New constitution
South Africa	1931 – 1961	Parliamentary republic	Referendum and new constitution
Tanganyika[‡ 4]	1961 – 1962	Presidential republic	New constitution
Trinidad and Tobago	1962 – 1976	Parliamentary republic	New constitution
Uganda	1962 – 1963	Parliamentary republic	Constitutional amendment
^ The flags shown are those in use at the time the country was a Commonwealth realm; the Ceylonese flag changed in 1951. ^ Now called Sri Lanka. ^ See also: Irish head of state from 1936-1949. ^ Now a part of Tanzania.

Republican referendums

Various Commonwealth realms have held referendums to consider whether they should become republics. These include:

• Ghanaian constitutional referendum, 1960 (passed)
• South African republic referendum, 1960 (passed)
• Gambian republic referendum, 1965 (failed: majority not 2/3)
• Gambian republic referendum, 1970 (passed)
• Australian republic referendum, 1999 (failed)
• Tuvaluan constitutional referendum, 2008 (failed)
• Saint Vincent and the Grenadines constitutional referendum, 2009 (failed)

See also

Commonwealth realms portal

• Commonwealth of Nations
• Member states of the Commonwealth of Nations
• Commonwealth unification movement
• States headed by Elizabeth II
• Self-governing colony
• British Overseas Territories

Notes

1. ^ F.R. Scott stated: "The common kinship within the British group today establishes a form of personal union, the members of which are legally capable of following different international policies even in time of war."^[15]
2. ^ W.Y Elliott stated: If a personal union be chosen, the Crown will be forced to act on the king's own discretion [and] since personal discretion is a modern monarch is unthinkable, the only alternative would be a league of states with a common but symbolic crown",^[17] and Alexander N. Sack stated: "Whatever the future development of the British Commonwealth may be [it] can be described as a that of associations or unions of States, as distinguished from 'personal' unions, on the one hand, and federal States, on the other.^[18]
3. ^ J. D. B. Miller stated:[T]he survey concludes with an attempt to classify the Commonwealth. It is no longer a federation, nor a military alliance, nor a personal union.^[20]
4. ^ During a British state visit to Jordan in 1984, Queen Elizabeth II made a speech expressing opinions of her British Cabinet that countered the views of her Australian Cabinet,^[22] though the Queen was evidently not representing Australia at that time. Similarly, Elizabeth II undertook a visit to Latin America to promote British goods at the same time a Canadian ministerial trip was underway in the same region in order to promote Canadian products.^[23]
5. ^ On 3 September 1939, the United Kingdom declared war on Nazi Germany, but it was only on 6 September that, under the articles of the Statute of Westminster, the Union of South Africa did same, followed by Canada on 10 September. Therefore, from 3 September to 10 September, King George VI, as king of the UK, South Africa and Canada, was both at war and at peace with Germany. Similarly, as he was still technically monarch of Ireland, it was George VI's duty to validate the credentials of the German consul to Ireland, which remained neutral throughout the war.
   A more extreme example was the Indo-Pakistani War of 1947, in which George VI, as head of state of both warring nations, was, in a legal sense, at war with himself. Similarly, in 1983 Queen Elizabeth II was monarch of Grenada when her governor-general there requested the invasion of the country by a number of other Caribbean states, including some that were also realms of the Queen; an undertaking that was opposed by a number of Elizabeth's other governments, such as those of the United Kingdom, Canada, and Belize.
6. ^ In the example of the 1983 invasion of Grenada, the Governor-General, Sir Paul Scoon, invited the intervention of foreign troops deliberately without ever having informed the Queen. Also, when Sir John Kerr dismissed the Australian government in 1975, he did not inform the Queen of his intent to do so.
7. ^ The figures in the image are, from left to right, back row: Ivy Dumont, Governor-General of the Bahamas; Silvia Cartwright, Governor-General of New Zealand; unknown; Pearlette Louisy, Governor-General of Saint Lucia; unknown; unknown; Adrienne Clarkson, Governor General of Canada; Peter Hollingworth, Governor-General of Australia; Filoimea Telito, Governor-General of Tuvalu; front row: unknown; Colville Young, Governor-General of Belize; Paulias Matane, Governor-General of Papua New Guinea; Queen Elizabeth II; The Duke of Edinburgh; Frederick Ballantyne, Governor-General of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines; unknown; and Clifford Husbands, Governor-General of Barbados.
8. ^ One Canadian constitutional scholar, Dr. Richard Toporoski, stated on this: "I am perfectly prepared to concede, even happily affirm, that the British Crown no longer exists in Canada, but that is because legal reality indicates to me that in one sense, the British Crown no longer exists in Britain: the Crown transcends Britain just as much as it does Canada. One can therefore speak of 'the British Crown' or 'the Canadian Crown' or indeed the 'Barbadian' or 'Tuvaluan' Crown, but what one will mean by the term is the Crown acting or expressing itself within the context of that particular jurisdiction".^[30]
9. ^ Monarchist League of New Zealand Chairman Professor Noel Cox stated: "Any alteration by the United Kingdom Parliament in the law touching the succession to the throne would, except perhaps in the case of Papua New Guinea, be ineffective to alter the succession to the throne in respect of, and in accordance with the law of, any other independent member of the Commonwealth which was within the Queen's realms at the time of such alteration. Therefore it is more than mere constitutional convention that requires that the assent of the Parliament of each member of the Commonwealth within the Queen's realms be obtained in respect of any such alteration in the law."^[33]
10. ^ In the Solomon Islands and Tuvalu, the Prime Minister must consult the legislature in confidence; in Papua New Guinea the Governor-General is nominated to the Queen by a parliamentary vote.
11. ^ The Colonial Office in London opposed this potentially "premature" and "pretentious" reference for a new country, and were also wary of antagonizing the United States, which had emerged from its Civil War as a formidable military power with unsettled grievances because of British support for the Confederate cause. See also: Name of Canada > Adoption of Dominion.
12. ^ The figures in the photo are, back row, left to right: Walter Stanley Monroe, Prime Minister of Newfoundland; Gordon Coates, Prime Minister of New Zealand; Stanley Bruce, Prime Minister of Australia; James Hertzog, Prime Minister of South Africa, and W.T. Cosgrave, President of the Executive Council of the Irish Free State; front row, left to right: Stanley Baldwin, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; the King; and William Lyon Mackenzie King, Prime Minister of Canada.
13. ^ The Viscount Haldane said in 1919 that in Australia the Crown "acts in self-governing States on the initiative and advice of its own ministers in these States."^[47]
14. ^ The ministers in attendance at the Imperial Conference agreed that: "In our opinion it is an essential consequence of the equality of status existing among the members of the British Commonwealth of Nations that the Governor General of a Dominion is the representative of the Crown, holding in all essential respects the same position in relation to the administration of public affairs in the Dominion as is held by His Majesty the King in great Britain, and that he is not the representative or agent of His Majesty's Government in Great Britain or of any Department of that Government.^[51]
15. ^ P.E. Corbett in 1940 questioned whether there were any existing terms that could be used to describe any or all of the "possessions of the British Crown,"^[19] while Scottish constitutional lawyer Arthur Berriedale Keith warned before 1930 that "the suggestion that the King can act directly on the advice of Dominion Ministers is a constitutional monstrosity, which would be fatal to the security of the position of the Crown."^[55]
16. ^ The Oireachtas of the Irish Free State passed the External Relation Act on 12 December 1936,^[59] the parliament of the Union of South Africa passed an act declaring that the abdication had taken place on 10 December, and the parliament of Canada passed the Succession to the Throne Act in 1937.^[45]

References

1. ^ ^{a b} "What is a Commonwealth Realm?". Royal Household. http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchAndCommonwealth/QueenandCommonwealth/WhatisaCommonwealthRealm.aspx. Retrieved 6 October 2009. 
2. ^ Royal Household. "Her Majesty the Queen". Queen's Printer. http://www.royal.gov.uk/HMTheQueen/HMTheQueen.aspx. Retrieved 23 January 2011. 
3. ^ Figures totaled from 2007 CIA World Fact Book
4. ^ Elizabeth II (1985). Loi sur les titres royaux. Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada. R.S., 1985, c. R-12. http://laws.justice.gc.ca/fr/showdoc/cs/R-12/se:1::se:2/20090503/fr?page=1. Retrieved 3 May 2009. 
5. ^ "Queen and Papua New Guinea". The Official Website of the British Monarchy. http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchandcommonwealth/thequeenandpapuanewguinea/queenandpapuanewguinea.aspx. Retrieved October 28, 2011. 
6. ^ Elizabeth II (1965). Constitution of the Cook Islands. Westminster: Queen's Printer. http://www.paclii.org/ck/legis/num_act/cotci327/. Retrieved 2 May 2009. 
7. ^ Trepanier, Peter (2004). "Some Visual Aspects of the Monarchical Tradition". Canadian Parliamentary Review (Ottawa: Commonwealth Parliamentary Association) 27 (2). http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Sites/LOP/Infoparl/english/issue.asp?param=160&art=287. Retrieved 2 May 2009. 
8. ^ Berriedale, Kieth (1936), "The King and the Imperial Crown: The Powers and Duties of His Majesty", in Coates, Colin MacMillan, Majesty in Canada: essays on the role of royalty, Toronto: Dundurn Press Ltd., 2006, p. 12, ISBN 9781550025866, http://books.google.ca/books?id=FhFyvhpPx8MC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false, retrieved 16 January 2011 
9. ^ Boyce, Peter (2008). The Queen's Other Realms. Annandale: Federation Press. p. 1. ISBN 9781862877009. http://books.google.ca/books?id=kY-Tk0-quyoC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false. 
10. ^ Oppenheim, Lassa (1952). Lauterpacht, Hersch. ed. International law: a treatise. 1. London: Longmans. p. 163. ISBN 1584776099. http://books.google.com/?id=tNYsAAAAMAAJ&q=personal+union. Retrieved 29 January 2010. 
11. ^ Clerk of the House of Commons (1947). Debates: official report. 1. Ottawa: King's Printer for Canada. p. 591. http://books.google.com/?id=3ktOAAAAMAAJ&dq=%22United+Kingdom+and+Canada%22+%22personal+union%22&q=%22The+United+Kingdom+and+Canada+are+to+be%22. Retrieved 29 January 2010. 
12. ^ Coolidge, Archibald Cary; Armstrong, Hamilton Fish (1927). Foreign affairs, Volume 6. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. pp. 124–125, 127. http://books.google.com/?id=xtYSAAAAIAAJ&q=%22personal+union%22. Retrieved 7 November 2009. 
13. ^ Library of Parliament (1947). Special war session, Volume 1. Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada. p. 591. http://books.google.com/?id=3ktOAAAAMAAJ&dq=%22United+Kingdom+and+Canada%22+%22personal+union%22&q=%22The+United+Kingdom+and+Canada+are+to+be%22. Retrieved 7 November 2009. 
14. ^ "Personal Union". Crowned Republic. http://www.crownedrepublic.com.au/index.php/australian-crown/personal-union. Retrieved 29 January 2010. 
15. ^ Scott, F. R. (January 1944). "The End of Dominion Status". The American Journal of International Law (American Society of International Law) 38 (1): 34–49. doi:10.2307/2192530. JSTOR 2192530. 
16. ^ ^{a b} "Black v Chrétien: Suing a Minister of the Crown for Abuse of Power, Misfeasance in Public Office and Negligence". Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law 9 (3). September 2002. http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v9n3/cox93.html. Retrieved 2 October 2008. 
17. ^ Elliott, W.Y (November 1930). "The Sovereignty of the British Dominions: Law Overtakes Practice". The American Political Science Review (American Political Science Association) 24 (4): 971–989. doi:10.2307/1946754. JSTOR 1946754. 
18. ^ ^{a b} Sack, Alexander N.; Stewart, Robert B. (March 1940). "Treaty Relations of the British Commonwealth of Nations". University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register (The University of Pennsylvania Law Review) 88 (5): 637–640. doi:10.2307/3308937. JSTOR 3308937. 
19. ^ ^{a b c} Corbett, P. E. (1940). "The Status of the British Commonwealth in International Law". The University of Toronto Law Journal (University of Toronto Press) 3 (2): 348–359. doi:10.2307/824318. JSTOR 824318. 
20. ^ Miller, J.D.B (October 1959). "The Commonwealth in the World". The American Historical Review (Washington, DC: American Historical Association) 65 (1). 
21. ^ Keith, Arthur Berriedale (1929). The sovereignty of the British dominions. New York: Macmillan and Co. Ltd.. p. xvii. ISBN 0837186684. http://books.google.com/?id=GjcGAAAAMAAJ&q=%22personal+union%22. Retrieved 7 November 2009. 
22. ^ Cohen, Zelman (1995) (Lecture). Further Reflections on an Australian Republic. Sir Robert Menzies Lecture Trust. http://www.menzieslecture.org/1995.html. Retrieved 3 May 2009. 
23. ^ Sharp, Mitchell (1994). Which Reminds Me..., A Memoir. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. p. 223. ISBN 978-0802005458. 
24. ^ ^{a b c} Bogdanor, Vernon (12 February 1998). The Monarchy and the Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 288. ISBN 978-0198293347. http://books.google.com/?id=mN6SzMefot4C&pg=PA289&lpg=PA289&dq=%22overseas+realms%22. 
25. ^ ^{a b} High Commissioner in United Kingdom (24 November 1952). "Royal Style and Titles". Documents on Canadian External Relations > Royal Style and Titles 18 (2). DEA/50121-B-40. http://www.international.gc.ca/department/history-histoire/dcer/details-en.asp?intRefid=3498. 
26. ^ Trepanier, Peter (2004). "Some Visual Aspects of the Monarchical Tradition". Canadian Parliamentary Review (Ottawa) 27 (2). http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Sites/LOP/Infoparl/27/2/27n2_04e_trepanier.pdf. Retrieved 8 October 2009. 
27. ^ Smy, William A. (2008). "Royal titles and styles". The Loyalist Gazette (Toronto: United Empire Loyalists Assocaition of Canada) XLVI (1). http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb1372/is_1_46/ai_n29437278/. Retrieved 3 January 2011. 
28. ^ Cox, Noel (19 October 2003), The Development of a Separate Crown in New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, p. 18, http://www.reocities.com/noelcoxfiles/Development_of_Separate_Crown_in_New_Zealand.pdf, retrieved 3 January 2011 
29. ^ Michie, Allan Andrew (1952). The Crown and the People. London: Secker and Warburg. p. 52. http://books.google.ca/books?id=lXwzAAAAIAAJ&q=%22equally+queen%22+%22elizabeth+II%22&dq=%22equally+queen%22+%22elizabeth+II%22&hl=en&ei=fHUhTYuQCsPtnQe98_20Dg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAQ. Retrieved 3 January 2011. 
30. ^ ^{a b c} Toporoski, Richard. "The Invisible Crown". Monarchy Canada. Archived from the original on 2 October 2008. http://web.archive.org/web/20080209220704/http://www.monarchist.ca/mc/invisibl.htm. Retrieved 20 April 2008. 
31. ^ ^{a b} Mallory, J.R. (August 1956). "Seals and Symbols: From Substance to Form in Commonwealth Equality". The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science (Montreal: Blackwell Publishing) 22 (3): 281–291. ISSN 0008-4085. JSTOR 138434. 
32. ^ See Sue v Hill [1999] HCA 30 at 93
33. ^ Cox, Noel (1998). written at Auckland University of Technology. Australian Journal of Law and Society (North Ryde: Macquarie University Press) 14 (1998/1999). 23 August 2003. ISSN 0729-3356. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=420752. Retrieved 13 July 2009. 
34. ^ George V (11 December 1931). Statute of Westminster, 1931. Westminster: Queen's Printer. c. 4 (U.K.). http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/StatuteofWestminster.html. Retrieved 2 May 2009. 
35. ^ Buckner, Phillip (2005). "The Last Great Royal Tour: Queen Elizabeth's 1959 Tour to Canada". In Buckner, Phillip. Canada and the End of Empire. Vancouver: UBC Press. p. 66. ISBN 0-7748-0915-9. http://books.google.com/?id=27IggObUC9kC&printsec=frontcover&q=. Retrieved 24 October 2009. 
36. ^ Lange, Nicolaus. "The Cook Islands’ unique constitutional and international status". Queen's Printer. p. 2. http://www.cookislands.de/files/cookisstatus.pdf. Retrieved 6 November 2009. 
37. ^ The Royal Household. "The current Royal Family". Queen's Printer. http://www.royal.gov.uk/ThecurrentRoyalFamily/Overview.aspx. Retrieved 2 July 2009. 
38. ^ ^{a b} Queen and anniversary messages - Who is entitled?. "The current Royal Family". Queen's Printer. http://www.royal.gov.uk/HMTheQueen/Queenandanniversarymessages/Whoisentitled.aspx. Retrieved 22 February 2011. 
39. ^ "World Who's Who > Reigning Royal Families > United Kingdom". Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. http://www.worldwhoswho.com/public/views/royal_families.html?country=UNITED_KINGDOM. Retrieved 3 May 2009. 
40. ^ "The Monarchy Today > Queen and State > Queen and Church > Queen and Church of Scotland". Queen's Printer. http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page4709.asp. Retrieved 25 October 2008. 
41. ^ Farthing, John (1985). Freedom Wears a Crown. Toronto: Veritas Paperback. ISBN 978-0949667038. 
42. ^ Pope, Joseph (2009). Confederation: Being a Series of Hitherto Unpublished Documents Bearing on the British North America Act. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing. p. 177. ISBN 978-1104086541. 
43. ^ Hubbard, R.H. (1977). Rideau Hall. Montreal and London: McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 9. ISBN 978-0773503106. 
44. ^ Lefroy, A. H. (1918). A Short Treatise on Canadian Constitutional Law. Toronto: Carswell. pp. 59–60. ISBN 0665851634. 
45. ^ ^{a b c d e f g h i} Heard, Andrew (1990). Canadian Independence. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University. http://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/324/Independence.html. Retrieved 6 May 2009. 
46. ^ Dale, W. (1983). The Modern Commonwealth. London: Butterworths. p. 24. ISBN 0406174040. 
47. ^ Theodore v. Duncan, 696, p.706 (Judicial Committee of the Privy Council 1919).
48. ^ Clement, W.H.P. (1916). The Law of the Canadian Constitution (3 ed.). Toronto: Carswell. pp. 14–15. ISBN 0665006845. 
49. ^ Williams, Jeffery (1983). Byng of Vimy: General and Governor General. Barnsley, S. Yorkshire: Leo Cooper in association with Secker & Warburg. pp. 314–317. ISBN 0802069355. 
50. ^ Marshall, Peter (September 2001). "The Balfour Formula and the Evolution of the Commonwealth". The Round Table 90 (361): 541–53. doi:10.1080/00358530120082823. 
51. ^ Balfour, Arthur (November 1926). "Imperial Conference 1926". Balfour Declaration. London: King's Printer. p. 4. E (I.R./26) Series. http://www.foundingdocs.gov.au/resources/transcripts/cth11_doc_1926.pdf. Retrieved 6 May 2009. 
52. ^ Jenks, Edward (1927). "Imperial Conference and the Constitution". Cambridge Law Journal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Law Society) 3 (13): 21. ISSN 0008-1973. 
53. ^ Walshe, Joseph P. (29 August 1927). Documents on Irish Foreign Policy > Despatch from Joseph P. Walshe (for Patrick McGilligan) to L.S. Amery (London) (D.5507) (Confidential) (Copy). Royal Irish Academy. http://www.difp.ie/docs/Volume3/1927/831.htm. Retrieved 24 October 2009. 
54. ^ Baker, Philip Noel (1929). The Present Juridical Status of the British Dominions in International Law. London: Longmans. p. 231. 
55. ^ Keith, Arthur Berriedale (1928). Responsible Government in the Dominions. 1 (2 ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. p. xviii. ISBN 0665820542. 
56. ^ Manuel et al. v. Attorney General, 822, p. 830 (Court of Appeal of England and Wales 1982).
57. ^ Ndlwana v. Hofmeyer, 229, p.237 (Supreme Court of South Africa 1937).
58. ^ Williams, Susan (2003). The People's King: The True Story of the Abdication. London: Penguin Books Ltd.. p. 130. ISBN 0-71399-573-4. 
59. ^ Edward VIII (12 December 1936). Executive Authority (External Relations) Act, 1936. Dublin: King's Printer for the Irish Free State. 3.2. http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1936/en/act/pub/0058/sec0003.html#zza58y1936s3. Retrieved 6 May 2009. 
60. ^ Mallory, J. R. (1984). The Structure and Function of Canadian Government (2 ed.). Toronto: Gage. pp. 36–37. 
61. ^ ^{a b} Library and Archives Canada. "Biography and People > A Real Companion and Friend > Behind the Diary > Politics, Themes, and Events from King's Life > The Royal Tour of 1939". Queen's Printer for Canada. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/king/023011-1070.06-e.html. Retrieved 6 May 2009. 
62. ^ Galbraith, William (1989). "Fiftieth Anniversary of the 1939 Royal Visit". Canadian Parliamentary Review (Ottawa: Commonwealth Parliamentary Association) 12 (3). http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Sites/LOP/Infoparl/english/issue.asp?param=130&art=820. Retrieved 6 May 2009. 
63. ^ Hasluck, Paul (1952). The Government and the People, 1939-1941. Canberra: Australian War Memorial. pp. 149–151. 
64. ^ Menzies' announcement of the declaration of war
65. ^ Monckton-Arundell, George (1949). "Documents Relating to New Zealand's Participation in the Second World War 1939-45 > 9 - The Governor-General of New Zealand to the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs". In Historical Publications Branch. The Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War 1939–1945. 1. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington. 4 September 1939. http://www.nzetc.org/tm/scholarly/tei-WH2-1Doc-c1-9.html. Retrieved 6 May 2009. 
66. ^ Kennedy, W.P.M. (1937). London: Oxford University Press. p. 541. 
67. ^ Keith, A. Berriedale (1938). The Dominions as Sovereign States. London: Macmillan. p. 203. 
68. ^ Scott 1944, p. 152
69. ^ de Smith, S. A. (July 1949). "The London Declaration of the Commonwealth Prime Ministers, April 28, 1949". The Modern Law Review 12 (3): 351–354. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1949.tb00131.x. JSTOR 1090506. 
70. ^ Pimlott, Ben (5 June 2002). The Queen. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.. p. 280. ISBN 978-0007114368. 
71. ^ Boyce 2008, pp. 9–10
72. ^ Boyce 2008, p. 11
73. ^ Royal Household (6 July 2010). "Address to the United Nations General Assembly". Queen's Printer. http://www.royal.gov.uk/LatestNewsandDiary/Speechesandarticles/2010/AddresstotheUnitedNationsGeneralAssembly6July2010.aspx. Retrieved 6 July 2010. 

Bibliography

• Bogdanor, V.; The Monarchy and the Constitution; Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995
• Cox, Noel; "The Theory of Sovereignty and the Importance of the Crown in the Realms of The Queen"; Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal; Vol. 2, No. 2; 2002
• Forsey, Eugene; Royal Power of Dissolution on Parliament in the British Commonwealth; Toronto: Oxford University Press; 1968 [1943]
• Maitland, F; "The Crown as a Corporation"; Law Quarterly Review; Vol. 17, No. 131; 1901
• McIntyre; P.; "The Strange Death of Dominion Status", Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History; Vol. 27, No. 2; 1999; 193-212