- Indo-Pakistani War of 1947
Warbox
conflict=Indo-Pakistani War of 1948
partof=theIndo-Pakistani Wars
campaign=
colour_scheme=background:#91ACDB
caption=
casus=Pakistan backedpashtun tribals and troops invade the princely state ofJammu & Kashmir .
date=October 21 ,1947 -December 31 ,1948
place=Kashmir
result=Stalemate; Princely State of Kashmir dissolved; UN mandated ceasefire.
territory=India occupies roughly 101,387 km² of Kashmir. Pakistan occupies 85,793 km²(Later divided intoAzad Kashmir (13,397 km²) andNorthern Areas (72,496 km²).)
combatant1=
flagicon|India|size=65px
India
combatant2=
flagicon|Pakistan|size=65px
Pakistan
commander1=flagicon|India Field Marshal K M Cariappa flagicon|India Lt Gen S M Shrinagesh flagicon|India Maj Gen K S Thimayya flagicon|India Maj Gen Kalwant Singh
commander2=flagicon|Pakistan Maj Gen Akbar Khan
strength1=
strength2=
casualties1=1,104 killed [http://164.100.24.219/rsq/quest.asp?qref=60605 Official Government of India Statement giving numbers of KIA - Parliament of India Website] . It is believed that this figure only gives the Indian Army casualties and not the State Forces.] (Indian army)684 killed (State Forces) [http://www.indianarmy.nic.in/martyrs/home.jsp?service=41&operation=6&subform=Search&hidrecord=10 JAK Rifles KIA] ] [http://www.indianarmy.nic.in/martyrs/home.jsp?service=40&operation=6&hidrecord=10&subform=Search Indian Army-Martyrs Home Page ] ]
3,152 wounded
casualties2=1,500 killed [http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+in0189) Library of Congress Country Studies] ] (Pakistan army) 2,633 killed, 4,688 wounded [http://www.pakdef.info/pakmilitary/army/war/48warbattlecasualties.html Battle Casualties of Azad Kashmir Regiment during 1947-1948] ] The Indo-Pakistani War of 1947, sometimes known as the First Kashmir War, was fought between India and Pakistan over the region ofKashmir from1947 to1948 . It was the first of four wars fought between the two newly independent nations. The result of the war still affects the geopolitics of both the countries.Cause
The British made
Gulab Singh the firstMaharaja of theprincely state ofJammu and Kashmir , after they defeated the Sikh during theFirst Anglo-Sikh War (1845-46) and signed theTreaty of Lahore in 1846. [ [http://www.collectbritain.co.uk/personalisation/object.cfm?uid=019PHO000000394U00076000 Srinagar] www.collectbritain.co.uk.] Gulab Singh founded a dynasty, the Royal House of Jammu and Kashmir, that was to rule the state, the second-largest principality under theBritish Raj , until India gained its independence in 1947.Prior to the withdrawal of the British from India, the state came under pressure from both India and Pakistan to join them. The
Maharaja of Kashmir,Hari Singh wanted to remain independent and tried to delay the issue. However at the time of British withdrawal the state was invaded by tribals from theNorth West Frontier Province (NWFP) and regular Pakistani soldiers. The Maharaja then decided to accede Kashmir to secular India, which sent troops to safeguard the Kashmir border. The legitimacy of the accession is still disputed by the Pakistanis.According to the instruments of partition of India, the rulers of princely states were given the choice to freely accede to either India or Pakistan. They were also asked to take into account the demographic nature, history, geography and future prospects their subjects into consideration. Raja Hari Singh, ruler of Kashmir, acceded to India. Due to a lack of demographic data concerning religious affiliations, it is difficult to determine whether public opoinion was a factor Raja Hari Singhs' decision.
ummary of war
AZK (Azad Kashmir) forces ("Azad" in
Urdu means liberated or free) are the local militia supported by the Pakistanis. The AZK had several advantages in the war, notably:
*Prior to the war the Jammu and Kashmir state forces had been spread thinly around the border as a response to militant activity, and so were badly deployed to counter a full scale invasion.
*Some of the state forces joined AZK forces.
*The AZK were also aided by regular Pakistani soldiers who manned some of their units, with the proportion increasing throughout the war.As a result of these advantages the main invasion force quickly brushed aside the Jammu and Kashmir state forces. But the attacker’s advantage was not vigorously pressed and the Indians halted the offensive by airlifting reinforcements. This was at the price of the state formally acceding to India. With Indian reinforcements the Pakistani / AZK offensive ran out of steam towards the end of 1947. The exception to this was in the High Himalayas sector where the AZK were able to make substantial progress until turned back at the outskirts of Leh in late June 1948. Throughout 1948 many small-scale battles were fought. None of these gave a strategic advantage to either side and the fronts gradually solidified. Support for the AZK forces by Pakistan became gradually more overt with regular Pakistani units becoming involved. A formal cease-fire was declared on31 December 1948 .tages of the war
This war has been split into ten stages by time. The individual stages are detailed below.
Initial invasion (Operation Gulmarg)
A large invasion of the Kashmir valley was mounted by the irregular forces, aimed at Srinagar, the summer capital of Jammu and Kashmir (Jammu being the winter capital). The state forces were defeated and the way to the capital, (
Srinagar ), was open. There was also a mutiny by state forces in favour of the AZK in Muzzaferabad and Domel.In desperation, Hari Singh, the ruler of Kashmir requested the Indian Government for Indian troops to stop the uprising. The Indians told him that if Singh signed an Instrument of Accession allowing Kashmir to join the Indian Union, only then would India rush in troops for the protection of one of its territories. This, the Maharaja promptly did. Following this accession, the Indian troops arrived and quickly blocked the advance of the invaders, preventing the imminent sacking of Srinagar. Moreover, the Pathans, who comprised the majority of the irregular forces appeared foremost interested in looting, killing, and plundering local towns and thus failed to press the attack home. [ [http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_321.shtml I Indo-Pakistani War, 1947-1949 By Tom Cooper] Air Combat Information GroupOctober 29 ,2003 ] The conflict was mired by acts ofsabotage ,arson andrape and other crimes committed against the native Kashmiris by Pakistani-backed tribals. [Deadly Connections: States That Sponsor Terrorism By Daniel Byman, Cambridge University Press, 2005 ISBN 0-521-83973-4, Page 158] [ [http://www.kmsnews.org/databank/History/History.htm History of J & K] ] [ [http://www.hizbmedia.com/ARTICAL.HTM Is Kashmir marching towards Peace-I by Nayeema Ahmed] Kashmir Media Service] In thePunch valley the Jammu and Kashmir state forces retreated into towns and were besieged.Indian defence of the Kashmir Valley
Indian forces, rapidly airlifted to Srinagar managed to defeat the irregular forces on the outskirts of the town. This was partially due to an outflanking manoeuvre by armoured cars. Shattered, the AZK were pursued as far as
Baramula and Uri and these towns were recaptured. In the Punch valley the sieges of the Jammu and Kashmir state forces continued. Meanwhile, the troops in Gilgit (theGilgit Scouts ) mutinied and this yielded most of the far north of the state to the AZK. They were joined by the Forces of Chitral State, the Mehtar of Chitral had acceded to Pakistan and he sent his forces to fight alongside the Gilgitis because of the close cultural and historical ties between Chitral and Gilgit.Attempted link-up at Punch
The Indian forces ceased their pursuit of the shattered AZK forces and swung south in an attempt to relieve Punch. This was less successful than hoped, because inadequate reconnaissance had underestimated the difficulty of the roads. Although the
relief column eventually reached Punch, the siege could not be lifted. A second relief column reached only Kotli and was forced to evacuate its garrison.Mirpur was captured by the AZK and its inhabitants particularly the Hindus were slaughtered.Fall of Jhanger and attacks on Naoshera and Uri
The Pakistani/AZK forces attacked and captured Jhanger. They then attacked Naoshera unsuccessfully. Other Pakistani/AZK forces made a series of unsuccessful attacks on Uri. In the south a minor Indian attack secured Chamb. By this stage of the war the front line began to stabilise as more Indian troops became available.
Operation Vijay: counterattack to Jhanger
The Indian forces launched a counterattack in the south recapturing Jhanger and Rajauri. In the Kashmir Valley the Pakistani/AZK forces continued attacking the Uri
garrison . In the north Skardu was brought under siege by Pakistani/AZK forces.Indian Spring Offensive
The Indians held onto Jhanger against numerous counterattacks from the AZK, who were increasingly supported by regular Pakistani Forces. In the Kashmir Valley the Indians attacked, recapturing Tithwail. The AZK made good progress in the High Himalayas sector, infiltrating troops to bring
Leh under siege, capturingKargil and defeating a relief column heading for Skardu.Operations Gulab and Erase
The Indians continued to attack in the Kashmir Valley sector driving north to capture Keran and Gurais. They also repelled a counterattack aimed at Tithwail. In the Punch Valley the forces besieged in Punch broke out and temporarily linked up with the outside world again. The Kashmir State army was able to defend Skardu from the Gilgit Scouts and thus they were not able to proceed down the Indus valley towards Leh. In August the Chitral Forces under Mata-ul-Mulk besieged Skardu and with the help of artillery were able to take Skardu. This freed the Gilgit Scouts to push further into Ladakh.
Operation Duck
During this time the front began to settle down with less activity by either side, the only major event was an unsuccessful attack by the Indians towards Dras (Operation Duck). The siege of Punch continued.
Operation Easy; Punch link-up
The Indians now started to get the upper hand in all sectors. Punch was finally relieved after a siege of over a year. The Gilgit forces in the High Himalayas, who had previously made good progress, were finally defeated. The Indians pursued as far as Kargil before being forced to halt due to supply problems. The Zoji-La pass was forced by using tanks (which had not been thought possible at that altitude) and Dras was recaptured. The use of tanks was based on experience gained in
Burma in 1945.Moves up to cease-fire
At this stage Indian Prime Minister Mr. Jawahar Lal Nehru decided to ask UN to intervene. A
UN cease-fire was arranged for the31 December 1948 . A few days before the cease-fire the Pakistanis launched a counter attack, which cut the road between Uri and Punch. After protracted negotiations a cease-fire was agreed to by both countries, which came into effect. The terms of the cease-fire as laid out in theUNCIP resolution. [ [http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/uncom1.htm Resolution adopted by the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan on13 August 1948 ] ] ofAugust 13 1948 were adopted by the UN onJanuary 5 1949 . This required Pakistan to withdraw its forces, both regular and irregular, while allowing India to maintain minimum strength of its forces in the state to preserve law and order. On compliance of these conditions aplebiscite was to be held to determine the future of the territory. In all, 1,500 soldiers died on each side during the war [ [http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/indo-pak_1947.htm Global security] ] and Pakistan was able to acquire roughly two-fifths of Kashmir while India maintained the remaining three fifths of Kashmir, including the most populous and fertile regions.Military insights gained from the war
On the use of armour
The use of light tanks and armoured cars was important at two stages of the war. Both of these Indian victories involved very small numbers of AFVs. These were:-
*The defeat of the initial thrust at Srinagar, which was aided by the arrival of 2 armoured cars in the rear of the irregular forces.
*The forcing of the Zoji-La pass with 11 Stuart M5 light tanks. This may show that armour can have a significant psychological impact if it turns up at places thought of as impossible.Fact|date=May 2008 It is also likely that the invaders did not deploy anti-tank weapons to counter these threats. Even the lightest weapons will significantly encumber leg infantry units, so they may well have been perceived as not worth the effort of carrying about, and left in rear areas. This will greatly enhance the psychological impact of the armour when it does appear.Fact|date=May 2008 The successful use of armour in this campaign strongly influenced Indian tactics in the 1962 war where great efforts were made to deploy armour to inhospitable regions (although with much less success in that case).Progression of front lines
*It is interesting to chart the progress of the front lines. After a certain troop density is reached progress was very slow with victories being counted in the capture of individual villages or peaks. Where troop density was lower (as it was in the High Himalayas sector and at the start of the war) rates of advance can be very high.Fact|date=May 2008
Deployment of forces
*The Jammu and Kashmir state forces were spread out in small packets along the frontier to deal with militant incidents. This made them very vulnerable to a conventional attack. India used this tactic successfully against the Pakistan Army in
East Pakistan (present dayBangladesh ) in the 1971 war.Notes
Bibliography
Major sources
*"Operations In Jammu and Kashmir 1947-1948", Ministry of Defence, Government of India, Thomson Press (India) Limited. New Delhi 1987. This is the Indian Official History.
*"The Indian Army After Independence", by KC Praval, 1993. Lancer International, ISBN 1-897829-45-0
*"Slender Was The Thread: The Kashmir confrontation 1947-1948", by Maj Gen LP Sen, 1969. Orient Longmans Ltd New Delhi.
*"Without Baggage: A personal account of the Jammu and Kashmir Operations 1947-1949" Lt Gen. E. A. Vas. 1987. Natraj Publishers Dehradun. ISBN 81-85019-09-6.
*"Kashmir: A Disputed Legacy, 1846-1990" by Alastair Lamb, 1991. Roxford Books. ISBN 0-907129-06-4.Other sources
*"The Indian Armour: History Of The Indian Armoured Corps 1941-1971", by Maj Gen Gurcharn Sandu, 1987, Vision Books Private Limited, New Delhi, ISBN 81-7094-004-4.
*"Thunder over Kashmir", by Lt Col Maurice Cohen. 1955 Orient Longman Ltd. Hyderabad
*"Battle of Zoji La", by Brig Gen SR Hinds, Military Digest, New Delhi, 1962.
*"History of Jammu and Kashmir Rifles (1820-1956)", by Maj K Barhma Singh, Lancer International New Delhi, 1990, ISBN 81-7062-091-0.ee also
*
Indo-Pakistani War of 1965
*Partition of India
*Mountain warfare
*Siachen warTemplate group
title = History series
list =
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.