- Freeway and expressway revolts
The Freeway Revolts (sometimes expressway revolts) refer to a phenomenon encountered in the
United States andCanada and in the 1960s and 1970s, where planned freeway construction in many cities was halted due to widespread public opposition; especially of those whose neighborhoods would be disrupted or displaced by the proposed freeways. Such "revolts" occurred in many U.S. cities, such as New Orleans, Boston, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, Portland,Seattle ,Washington DC , Cleveland, andBaltimore . In many cities, one can findunused highway s, abruptly-terminating freeway alignments, and short stretches of freeway in the middle of nowhere, all of which are evidence of larger projects which were never completed.A similar protest in
Toronto ,Canada led to the 1971 halt to completion of theSpadina Expressway then under development. InVancouver ,Canada , a freeway project that began with the construction of the Georgia and Dunsmuir Viaducts in Strathcona was stopped by activists and residents; the plan was intended to link an eight-lane freeway from theTranscanada Highway through the East End, destroying much ofChinatown . Before it was stopped, Vancouver'sHogan's Alley neighbourhood was largely demolished. InMontreal ,Canada , a protest is mounting towards the proposed Notre-Dame Expressway, an 8-lane entrenched highway that would separate the residential neighborhood of Hochelaga-Maisonneuve from the St. Lawrence river.After
World War II , there was a major drive to build a freeway network in the United States; including (but not limited to) theInterstate Highway System . Design and construction began in earnest in the 1950s, and many cities (as well as rural areas) were subjected to the bulldozer. However, many of the proposed freeway routes were drawn up without considering local interest; in many cases the construction of the freeway system was considered a regional (or national) issue which trumped local concerns.Starting in 1956, in San Francisco, when many neighborhood activists became aware of the effect that freeway construction was having on local neighborhoods, effective city opposition to many freeway routes in many cities was raised; this led to the modification or cancellation of many proposed routes. The freeway revolts continued into the 1970s, further enhanced by concern over the
energy crisis and rising fuel costs, as well as a growing environmentalist movement. Responding to massive anti-highway protests in Boston in 1970, [http://books.google.com/books?id=LCCvnLt2AbcC&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=francis+sargent+freeway+moratorium&source=web&ots=Z_KKBXHPs2&sig=3VXbO4GpvF4e7QRd3jWNljbJvX0] governorFrancis Sargent of Massachusetts ordered planning and construction of all planned expressways inside the Route 128 loop highway halted, with the exception of the remaining segments of theCentral Artery . However, some proposals forcontrolled-access freeways have been debated and finalized as a compromise to build them as at-grade expressways.California
an Francisco
In
San Francisco, California , public opposition tofreeway s dates to 1955, when the "San Francisco Chronicle " published a mapFact|date=June 2008 of proposed routes. Construction of the elevatedEmbarcadero Freeway along the downtown waterfront also helped to organize the opposition, articulated by architecture criticAllan Temko , who began writing for the "Chronicle" in 1961. The 1955 San Francisco Trafficways Plan included the following routes that were never completed:* A portion of the
Mission Freeway was built and still exists as the near-freeway portion of San Jose Avenue from Interstate 280 to Randall Street. Northeast of that section, it would have run parallel to Mission Street to meet theCentral Freeway above Duboce Avenue.
* TheCrosstown Freeway would have run parallel to Bosworth Street and O'Shaughnessy Boulevard (and throughGlen Canyon Park ) from Interstate 280 to theWestern Freeway near 7th Avenue. Most of the right of way for this freeway was cleared but it was never built.
* TheWestern Freeway would have run north from Interstate 280 along the line of Junipero Serra Boulevard, then tunnelling to 7th Avenue to meet theCrosstown Freeway . It would have then continued north to the southern edge ofGolden Gate Park and followed an unspecified route (in the 1951 version, a tunnel under the park and then a depressed routing through the Panhandle) northeast to the eastern end of the Panhandle, continuing east from there between Fell and Oak Streets to meet theCentral Freeway .
* A portion of thePark Presidio Freeway was built as and still exists asSR 1 (CA) through the Presidio from theGolden Gate Bridge . South of that section the freeway would have continued, replacing what is now Park Presidio Boulevard, and then tunneled underGolden Gate Park to meet the Western Freeway.
* A portion of theCentral Freeway was built and the original section west from theBayshore Freeway to Mission Street still exists asUS 101 . The section northwest from Mission to Market Street was reconstructed in 2004. The section north of Market Street to Golden Gate Avenue was demolished and not rebuilt. The remaining distance to theGolden Gate Freeway was never built.
* A portion of theEmbarcadero Freeway was built from the Bay Bridge approach to Broadway as Interstate 480. The section north of Broadway to theGolden Gate Freeway was never built. The entire freeway was removed after theLoma Prieta Earthquake .
* Most of theSouthern Embarcadero Freeway was built and still exists as part of Interstate 280, but the section from Third Street to the Bay Bridge approach was never built. The section between Sixth and Third Streets was removed after theLoma Prieta Earthquake .
* TheGolden Gate Freeway along the northern edge of the city from theEmbarcadero Freeway to theGolden Gate Bridge approach was never built.
* The freeway approach fromUS 101 and Interstate 280 to the Southern Crossing bridge was never built because the bridge was not built.The 1960 Trafficways Plan deleted several of these routes but added another:
* The
Hunters Point Freeway would have run fromUS 101 south of the city limits on landfill aroundCandlestick Point and across Hunters Point to meet Interstate 280 near what is now Cesar Chavez Street.In 1959, the
San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to cancel seven of ten planned freeways, including an extension of theCentral Freeway . In 1964, protests against a freeway through the Panhandle andGolden Gate Park led to its cancellation, and in 1966 the Board of Supervisors rejected an extension of the Embarcadero Freeway to theGolden Gate Bridge .Opposition to the Embarcadero Freeway continued, and in 1985, the Board of Supervisors voted to demolish it. It was closed after 1989's
Loma Prieta earthquake and torn down shortly thereafter. The entire portion of theCentral Freeway north of Market Street was demolished over the next decade: the top deck in 1996, and the lower deck in 2003. Two other short freeway segments were demolished in the same time period: the Terminal Separator Structure nearRincon Hill and the Embarcadero Freeway, and the stub end of Interstate 280 near Mission Bay. San Francisco was the only major city in the country that lost freeway miles between 1990 and 2005, and one more elevated structure is proposed for demolition and replacement with a boulevard: the Doyle Drive freeway approach to theGolden Gate Bridge that runs through the city's historicPresidio of San Francisco . In every case, the freeways were or are expected to be replaced with surface-level landscaped boulevards, with the former freeway corridors enhanced with extensions oflight rail transit.Oakland
In
Oakland, California , the Richmond Boulevard Freeway would have run along Valdez Street, Richmond Boulevard, Glen Echo Creek, and Moraga Avenue from 20th Street to SR 13. It was approved by Oakland voters in a 1945 bond issue, but was canceledAugust 16 ,1956 when the city of Piedmont was unable to pay for its portion of the route. ["Plans for Freeway to be Dropped," Oakland Tribune, August 17, 1956] In 1949, the Richmond Boulevard Protective Association had protested the route and its planned destruction of their homes. ["Richmond Group Attacks Plan for Extending Freeway," Oakland Tribune, July 5, 1949]Los Angeles
*The
Laurel Canyon Freeway (SR 170) would have been aligned through western Hollywood, theMid-City West area, and western Inglewood en route to its terminus at theSan Diego Freeway (I-405) nearLos Angeles International Airport . It was scrapped in the face of community opposition from these districts and its namesake Laurel Canyon. Only the portion traversing theBaldwin Hills was finished, later being designated asLa Cienega Boulevard .
*TheBeverly Hills Freeway (SR 2) would have run from theHollywood Freeway (US 101) in southern Hollywood to the San Diego Freeway (I-405) in Westwood along the alignment of Melrose Avenue and Santa Monica Boulevard. It went through several proposed iterations--including acut-and-cover tunnel--before its mid-1970s abandonment in the face of opposition from residents of Beverly Hills, the Fairfax District, and Hancock Park.
*The Slauson Freeway (SR 90), originally known as theRichard M. Nixon Freeway and intended to run across southern Los Angeles and northern Orange counties between the Pacific Coast Highway (SR 1) and Riverside (SR 91), was truncated as a result of opposition to its construction throughSouth Central Los Angeles . The only portions completed to freeway level are the shortMarina Freeway that runs between Marina del Rey and southern Culver City and the Richard M. Nixon Parkway in Yorba Linda.
*TheGlendale Freeway (SR 2) terminates roughly 1.5 miles northeast of its intended terminus at the Hollywood Freeway (US 101), due to opposition from residents of Silver Lake.
*The Pacific Coast Freeway (SR 1) would have upgraded the existing Pacific Coast Highway to freeway standards. Opposition by residents of Malibu, Santa Monica, and the coastal cities of the South Bay region led to the project's abandonment. One segment, between Oxnard and the Point Mugu Naval Air Station, was built in the 1960s before the project was abandoned.
*The Redondo Beach Freeway (SR 91) would have linked the Pacific Coast Freeway in Redondo Beach or the San Diego Freeway (I-405) in Torrance to theLong Beach Freeway (I-710). Opposition by Redondo Beach and Torrance led to its truncation to its current terminus at theHarbor Freeway (I-110) in Gardena; the California legislature subsequently renamed it theGardena Freeway .
*TheCentury Freeway (I-105), itself the subject of an unsuccessful freeway revolt in Hawthorne,South Central Los Angeles , Lynwood, and Downey that lasted nearly two decades, was truncated at theSan Gabriel River Freeway (I-605) instead of its intended terminus at theSanta Ana Freeway (I-5) due to opposition from the city of Norwalk. One of the compromises allowing the freeway to be built caused the inclusion of a mass transit line in the freeway median. This is theLACMTA Green Line , which opened with the freeway in 1995.
*TheLong Beach Freeway (I-710) was originally intended to go from the port complex all the way north to Pasadena, linking up with the Ventura and Foothill Freeways (SR 134 & I-210), completing a bypass of Downtown Los Angeles to the east. The freeway was completed to just past I-10 in Alhambra, and a half-mile stub was built in Pasadena (still unsigned, but officially SR 710). Opposition came from the small city of South Pasadena which would have been cut in half, impacting its small but lively downtown. A six mile gap currently exists and Caltrans is still attempting to build some sort of link, the latest idea of which has been a pair of tunnels.
**Opposition to the building of the 710 extension through South Pasadena has, for some 30 years, resulted in the suspension of plans to build an extension from the 210 freeway through West Pasadena and South Pasadena. The ramps exist and a stub is in place atCalifornia Avenue , but much of the land taken for the freeway has been resold byCaltrans to private parties. In 2006, the idea of completing the freeway by means of an undergroundtunnel was first proposed. This idea is currently under a funded study by theLACMTA .
**A proposed rehabilitation and widening of the agedLong Beach Freeway (I-710) between the Pomona (SR 60) and San Diego (I-405) freeways, which would have removed over 2000 residences in five cities and one unincorporated area, generated such opposition thatCaltrans and theLos Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) abandoned it within days of its unveiling in 2004. Caltrans and MTA have issued a new plan that would use MTA-owned utility right-of-way along theLos Angeles River and require the taking of fewer than ten residences.
*During the 1980s,Caltrans proposed extending theOrange Freeway (SR 57) from its terminus at the "Orange Crush" interchange to the San Diego Freeway (I-405) by means of an elevated alignment along the bed of theSanta Ana River . Pressure from environmental groups led Caltrans and theOrange County Transportation Authority to abandon the plan.Fact|date=February 2007Orange County
In Southern California, a number of environmental organizations including the
Natural Resources Defense Council , theSierra Club , theSurfrider Foundation and others, along with the California State Parks Foundation, banded together to stop a planned extension to the SR 241 Foothill South Toll Road. The groups contend that the project threatens the fragile San Mateo Creek Watershed and the would result in the loss of a significant portion of the popular San Onofre State Beach Park. In 2006, the coalition filed a lawsuit against the Transportation Corridors Agency - the agency responsible for the project - stating that deficiencies in the project's environmental impact report violated theCalifornia Environmental Quality Act . The groups were joined in the lawsuit by the California State Attorney General's Office.an Diego
State Route 252 was intended to connect Interstate 5 to Interstate 805. Ramps were constructed on I-805 at 43rd Street before the project was canceled in 1994 due to neighborhood opposition. The new freeway would have cut right through the heart of
Barrio Logan . Much of the land intended for freeway construction is still unoccupied. The interchange ramps from I-805 now end in a shopping mall parking lot.Colorado
There was opposition to a planned beltway around Denver, which was to be signed as Interstate 470. Eventually, a compromise was reached, and the beltway was built, using three different designations:
Colorado State Highway 470 ,E-470 and theNorthwest Parkway . Currently, a gap remains in the beltway, as it stops short of reaching the Denver suburbs of Broomfield and Golden, where fierce opposition to the road continues.Connecticut
Hartford
In 1973 environmentalists filed lawsuits that effectively killed construction of the planned Interstate 291 beltway west of
Interstate 91 , the proposedInterstate 484 expressway through the downtown, and the proposedInterstate 284 expressway betweenEast Hartford andSouth Windsor . (In 1992 the Route 9 Expressway was extended north from I-91 in New Britain to Interstate 84 in Farmington, completing what would have been the southwest quadrant of the I-291 beltway.Eastern Connecticut
Interstate 84 was originally planned to continue on an easterly course to
Providence, Rhode Island , closely following US 6 through Tolland and Windham Counties. Environmental concerns and Connecticut and Rhode Island led to the cancellation of this extension, and I-84 was shifted to the existingWilbur Cross Highway (which had been designated I-86; this number has since reappeared on a partially-completed expressway in northernPennsylvania andUpstate New York ) between Hartford andSturbridge, Massachusetts in 1983. The already-completed portions of this extension was redesignated asInterstate 384 andUS-6 Windham Bypass. CONNDOT and the FHWA intended to construct the US-6 Freeway through Andover, Bolton, and Coventry to link I-384 and the Windham Bypass. After 40 years since it was first planned, CONNDOT, the FHWA, and local officials remained deadlocked with the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers over the routing of the US-6 Freeway. Since the agencies involved could not come to an agreement, CONNDOT abandoned plans the US-6 Freeway in 2005.Fairfield County
Local opposition, particularly in the town of Wilton, convinced a federal judge to halt construction of the
U.S. Route 7 Expressway between Norwalk and Danbury in 1972. State and federal highway officials subsequently prepared anenvironmental impact statement for the expressway, and a Federal judge allowed construction to resume in 1983. By then however, the cost of construction had skyrocketed and there were no longer any funds available to complete the expressway, as all highway funds were diverted into a massive statewide highway repair program in the wake of theMianus River Bridge collapse months earlier. The proposal remained on the books until the CONNDOT canceled expressway plans in 1999 in lieu of widening the existing Route 7 to 4 lanes, citing a lack of funding and no feasible route that would avoid the environmentally-sensitiveNorwalk River basin. Some in Connecticut have been seeking to revive the expressway proposal, including those who originally opposed it, citing the rapidly increasing volume of traffic and the number of fatal accidents on the existing Route 7 over the past 20 years. Further north on US-7 however, officials in Brookfield have long pushed CONNDOT to construct a new US-7 freeway to the west of Brookfield. After decades of environmental studies and intense debate, construction on the Brookfield Bypass began in 2007 and is expected to open in 2009.Georgia
Local opposition was responsible for the death knell of a number of freeway projects in Metro
Atlanta , including the intown portion of theStone Mountain Freeway from the existingU.S. 78 freeway to what is now Freedom Parkway in downtown Atlanta, and the intown portion of what would have been Interstate 485. The northern part of that freeway was built asGeorgia 400 , while the southern portion of the highway exists as Interstate 675. The highways would have intersected in a large stack interchange complex roughly where theCarter Center exists today, east of downtown Atlanta. Interstate 420 would have skirted the city limits of Atlanta to the south, running fromInterstate 20 in Decatur toDouglasville . The center portion of what would have become I-420 was constructed, and exists asLangford Parkway .Additional local protests and legislative action ended planning and construction of the
Outer Perimeter and the Northern Arc, which would have surrounded Atlanta about 20 miles (32 km) outside of the present Perimeter Highway.Illinois
*Since the 1970s, the
Illinois Department of Transportation has sought to extend the freeway ("expressway") portion ofIllinois Route 53 inChicago from its northern terminus atLake-Cook Road , perhaps meeting theTri-State Tollway (I-94) somewhere in northern Lake County. The most likely alignment for the route would take it through the village of Long Grove, the residents of which have fought a thus-far successful legal and political battle against the extension. Many residents of cities such as Mundelein and Lake Zurich still display "BUILD 53" signs and bumper stickers.*The Crosstown Expressway was a proposed highway in the 1970s that would have run westward from near the present confluence of the
Chicago Skyway and theDan Ryan Expressway on Chicago's south side toward Cicero Avenue nearChicago Midway International Airport . From there, the freeway would have run northward along and parallel to Cicero to the Edens - Kennedy junction on the north side of Chicago. The highway, which would have been designated Interstate 494, was canceled in 1979 by then-MayorJane Byrne and then-Illinois Governor Jim Thompson, both of whom cited the $1.2 billion price tag as reason enough to terminate the project. Monies from the aborted highway ultimately went to the construction of theChicago Transit Authority 's Orange Line, connecting the Loop with Midway Airport, and an extension to the CTA's Blue Line, connecting downtown withO'Hare Airport . This project, though, was resurrected in2007 , nearly three decades after it had been canceled.*The
Elgin-O'Hare Expressway was intended to connectElgin, Illinois andO'Hare International Airport through the west side of the airport. However, the expressway remains incomplete on both sides. The current western terminus is at Lake Street (U.S. Route 20 ) inHanover Park, Illinois , and the current eastern terminus is at Rohlwing Road (near I-290). A western connection to the nearbyElgin Bypass (U.S. Route 20 ) may be possible in the future, butElk Grove Village, Illinois has fought a successful fight against extending the eastern terminus. Although the expressway today effectively links Hanover Park with I-290, the road is still called the Elgin-O'Hare Expressway, to much ridicule by the locals.*The
Amstutz Expressway was meant to be a lakeshore expressway inNorth Chicago, Illinois andWaukegan, Illinois . However, a large portion in northern North Chicago was never completed, so the road exists in two small portions. The Waukegan portion is frequently referred to as "The Highway to Nowhere" because of its uselessness.Sheridan Road runs along the expressway the entire length.*There were plans to upgrade
Lake Shore Drive to full Interstate standards, and two separate designations were proposed for this upgrade. First designated as Interstate 494 (before that designation was moved to the Crosstown Expressway), and later, Interstate 694, the project was canceled after opposition from North Side residents who didn't want an interstate in their communities, fearing that land along the shores of Lake Michigan would be lost. As of 2007, Lake Shore Drive remains a substandard expressway with a mix of interchanges and at-grade intersections.Louisiana
When I-10 was built through
New Orleans, Louisiana , a segment of formerly tree-lined ground along Claiborne Avenue was destroyed to build the elevated highway. While local efforts to stop this route of I-10 were unsuccessful, the disruption motivated residents to oppose further planned freeways through historic neighborhoods.The proposed
Vieux Carré Riverfront Expressway would have run along theMississippi River in theFrench Quarter of New Orleans. Local preservationists worked to build popular support to stop the proposed elevated expressway in the 1960s. [Weingroff, Richard F. [http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/neworleans.htm "The Second Battle of New Orleans: Vieux Carré Riverfront Expressway (I-310)"] ,Federal Highway Administration . AccessedMay 31 ,2007 .]Maryland
Freeways Interstate 95,
Interstate 83 , andInterstate 70 are not directly connected to each other insideBaltimore city limits because of freeway revolts led by activist and later politicianBarbara Mikulski . Mikulski became a U.S. Representative and later a Senator after rising to prominence with freeway revolts. In particular, I-70 was stopped throughLeakin Park , and terminates at the Baltimore City line, just inside the I-695 Beltway, rather than connecting to I-95, while I-83 terminates on city streets in Baltimore instead of connecting to I-95. Additional roads that would have formed a more complete freeway network in the city were abandoned or redesigned, leaving some short sections (the former I-170, left unconnected to any other Interstate highway, soU.S. Route 40 was re-routed onto it), or rights of way that were built as city streets rather than freeways (Martin Luther King Boulevard). TheWindlass Freeway was canceled as well, although a small portion of it was constructed, and it is now signed as I-695.Massachusetts
In 1970, Governor
Francis W. Sargent ordered theBoston Transportation Planning Review , a review of all freeway plans within the Route 128 beltway aroundBoston . As a result, several freeways were canceled in 1971 and 1972:* The Southwest Expressway (Interstate 95) to Canton was replaced by the MBTA Orange Line. I-95 was rerouted to follow Route 128 around Boston.
* The Northeast Expressway (also I-95) to Peabody was largely eliminated. The southernmost part, which was already built, isU.S. Route 1 .
* The Inner Belt (Interstate 695 and 95) around Boston was eliminated. A short section (which would have been the I-95 part of the Inner Belt) was built as a city street.
* The Northwest Expressway (Route 2 andU.S. Route 3 ) to Burlington was replaced by the MBTA Red Line extension to Alewife. Routes 2 and 3 were left on their old street-level routes.One notable highway project was not canceled:
* TheCentral Artery cut a swath through DowntownBoston neighborhoods, creating one of the greatest eyesores in urban America during the 1950s. Starting in 1991, the Central Artery was rerouted into undergroundtunnels and the elevated eyesore was demolished and replaced by parks and new buildings during a massive project known as the Big Dig.Michigan
Detroit
In the 1970s, an extension of the Davison Freeway in Detroit was planned on both ends, to connect
Interstate 96 , the Jeffries Freeway, toInterstate 696 , the Reuther Freeway, by way of a freeway aligned along Mound Road. A freeway-to-freeway interchange was constructed at Exit 186 of the Jeffries, and a massive stacked freeway-to-freeway interchange was also constructed on I-696 at Mound Road. However, while the Jeffries was still being constructed, the City of Detroit passed a decree that no further freeways would be constructed. There was a strong desire to preserve the existing neighborhoods, which was a factor in rerouting the planned Jeffries Freeway, even though the neighborhoods themselves were suffering from urban blight. The massive Davison Avenue exit of the Jeffries, as a result, sees much less traffic than it was designed for, as does the Mound Road exit on I-696.The cancellation also scrubbed plans to connect the Mound Road interchange to the existing M-53 expressway, although further development of Macomb County has revived speculation on at least this portion of highway. The land impact would be minimalized along the Mound Road corridor, as Mound was constructed as a multilane divided highway with a particularly wide median, suggesting that MDOT planned for this stretch to be upgraded to a full freeway at some point in the future.
Oakland County
In the 1970s, Interstate 275 was planned to bypass Detroit and Pontiac, connecting with its parent route,
Interstate 75 , near the city of Monroe at the southern end, and Clarkston at the northern end. I-275 was slightly realigned when it was determined that it would be more feasible to alignInterstate 96 along Schoolcraft Avenue instead of the more heavily developed Grand River Avenue as originally planned, and part of I-275 would now carry I-96.As construction progressed on the massive ramps that would connect I-275 to the existing interchange of I-96 and the western terminus of I-696, fierce opposition rose up from residents within several Oakland County communities, including Commerce Township, through where much of I-275 would have run. Environmental concerns were cited, as well as fears of dropping property values. As a result, the construction of I-275 north of I-96/I-696 was canceled. A stub from the former eastern leg of I-96, redesignated part of M-102, to what would have been northbound I-275, was left behind, as was a ramp that ran parallel to the westbound I-96 ramp that would've carried northbound I-275 and connected with the ramp from M-102.
The stubs, as well as previously unbuilt bridges and ramps, were opened in 1994 as a freeway extension was built up to 12 Mile Road. This extension was designated as M-5. Between 1994 and 2002, M-5 was extended further northward along the right-of-way that had been reserved for I-275, but as a grade-level expressway with traffic lights at 13 Mile, 14 Mile, and Maple Roads, and a grade-level railroad crossing between Maple Road and M-5's northern terminus at Pontiac Trail. Local residents continue to resist further expansion, even as Commerce Township slowly succumbs to
urban sprawl .In addition to the resistance against I-275, a planned extension from Northwestern Highway to I-275 was shelved in the 1970s as part of the same revolt. Although talks of reviving the Northwestern Extension continued for decades, development of the land along the proposed extension's right-of-way, including a
strip mall right at Northwestern's current terminus, has effectively ended any chance of such a freeway being constructed.Minnesota
There were once plans for a northern bypass route of downtown Minneapolis; this bypass was to be signed as Interstate 335. Grading for I-335's connections to I-35W and I-94, as well as land acquisition and demolition for the road's right-of-way, had already begun when local residents protested I-335's proposed path through their communities. Stub ramps on I-35W, some of which are now part of the Johnson Street interchange, remain as clues to where I-335 would have begun; more stub ramps can also be found on I-94 at the North 3rd Street interchange.
New Jersey
Although planned in the 1960s, the
Somerset Freeway , which would have connected Interstate 95 from Trenton toInterstate 287 near Metuchen, would have cut through some of the wealthy established properties around Princeton. In addition, theNew Jersey Turnpike Authority , whose roadway went from theDelaware Memorial Bridge toNew York City , feared that the paralleling Somerset Freeway, which had no toll, would have caused the NJTPA to lose revenue south of the I-287 interchange.In 1982, an act of Congress allowed the Somerset Freeway to be dropped, but stipulated that I-95 would be rerouted, via the
Pennsylvania Turnpike into New Jersey. This I-95/PA Turnpike interchange, which was never built in the beginning, will be constructed starting in 2006-07, with completion by 2010. When completed, the new interchange will make I-95 a continuous route between Philadelphia andNew York City .Another, but similar plan involving
Interstate 78 would have bisected the town of Phillipsburg, but NJDOT and PennDOT, under opposition from local residents, decided to reroute I-78 south of theLehigh Valley area, on what would have been the planned I-278 bypass. This led to the downgrade of I-378 inBethlehem, Pennsylvania from an Interstate highway to a PA State highway route.New York
New York City
Several expressways in the
New York City , mostly planned byRobert Moses , were canceled because of public oppositions, including two that would have been built through Midtown and Lower Manhattan.The
Lower Manhattan Expressway was planned to carryInterstate 78 from its current terminus at the end of theHolland Tunnel through Lower Manhattan to theWilliamsburg Bridge with a connection to theManhattan Bridge at Canal St. The Expressway would have been built directly through such neighborhoods asGreenwich Village ,SoHo , and the Lower East Side, much of which was rundown by the mid 20th century. After a long battle, the expressway was canceled in the 1970s by New York GovernorNelson Rockefeller due to fears of increased pollution and negative effects on such cultural neighborhoods as Little Italy and Chinatown.The
Mid-Manhattan Expressway was another freeway planned to be built directly through the busyMidtown Manhattan business district just south of 34th Street and would pass very close to theEmpire State Building . The Expressway was to carry Interstate 495 from theLincoln Tunnel (where I-495 was to continue to theNew Jersey Turnpike ) to theQueens Midtown Tunnel where it would connect to theLong Island Expressway . The expressway was originally very popular among local leaders, and Moses had gone so far as to run the Expressway right through Manhattan skyscrapers. However, fears of increased vehicular traffic in the already congested city brought the expressway down and it was canceled in 1971.Other expressways in the outer boroughs had been planned, but later canceled, including the Bushwick Expressway, an extension of
Interstate 78 throughBrooklyn andQueens that would run from theWilliamsburg Bridge (at the end of theLower Manhattan Expressway ) toJohn F. Kennedy International Airport . Also, the Cross Brooklyn Expressway, a faster commercial route paralleling theBelt Parkway from theVerrazano-Narrows Bridge toJohn F. Kennedy International Airport . The former was canceled largely due to the cancellation of the Lower Manhattan Expressway. For this reason, none of I-78's spur routes actually connect to I-78; the closest connection would have been made byInterstate 478 via theBrooklyn-Battery Tunnel .Other expressway cancellations included the Queens-Interboro Expressway, which would have connected the
Queens Midtown Tunnel with southern neighborhoods ofBrooklyn andQueens and theCross Harlem Expressway , which would have run in the vicinity of 125th Street inHarlem from theTriborough Bridge to theHudson River (plans also included building a bridge at 125th Street to New Jersey over the Hudson).Some of
New York City 's expressways were left unfinished due to local opposition. InQueens , theClearview Expressway abruptly ends in the neighborhood of Hollis. It was slated to continue south toJohn F. Kennedy International Airport , but was canceled. The proposed segment near JFK Airport was built as theJFK Expressway between 1989 and 1992. [ [http://www.nycroads.com/roads/jfk/ JFK Expressway @ NYCROADS.com] ] InThe Bronx , theSheridan Expressway was to run from theBruckner Expressway in theSouth Bronx to the Westchester County Line where it would meet with theNew England Thruway , running along what is now Boston Post Road (US-1 ). However, this extension was canceled and today the Sheridan Expressway runs a very short route from theBruckner Expressway to theCross Bronx Expressway .Much of the reason for the cancellations was due to local groups protesting the construction of these expressways through their neighborhoods, and the seen negative effects in local communities caused by the building of such expressways as the
Cross Bronx Expressway , which is largely credited for the destruction and dereliction of the Tremont neighborhood, and theBrooklyn-Queens Expressway .Long Island
New York City was not the only part of New York to face an onslaught of freeway revolts.
Long Island , which was almost as heavily populated as New York City, had dozens of roads planned by the New York State Department of Transportation, as well as Suffolk and Nassau Counties. On two occasions, Suffolk County built roads and allowed them to be redesignated as state highways, in the hope that the state would upgrade them when the county couldn't. The following is a list of roads throughout New York State that were either canceled, truncated, or stalled.* A.O. Smith Turnpike.
* Atlantic Expressway-Sunrise Highway.
* Babylon-Northport Expressway.
* Bethpage State andCaumsett State Parkway s.
* Broad Hollow Expressway.
* Cross River Drive Extension.
* Cedar Swamp Road.
* Long Island Expressway Extension.
* Long Lane.
* Nassau Expressway.
* Nicoll's Road.
*Northern State Parkway Extension.
* Nesconset-Port Jefferson Highway-North Shore Expressway.
* Ocean Parkway Extension.
* Patchogue-Mount Sinai Road Extension.
*Ponquogue Causeway .
*Port Jefferson-Westhampton Beach Highway .
* Seaford-Oyster Bay Expressway.
*Sound Shore Parkway .
*Southern State Parkway Extension.
* Straight Path Extension.
* Veterans Memorial Highway Extension.
*Wantagh State Parkway Extension.
* West Babylon-Centerport Highway.
* Western Nassau Expressway.
* William Floyd Parkway.Hudson Valley
*Bear Mountain Parkway
*Blue Mountain Parkway
*Briarcliff-Peekskill Parkway
*Catskill Expressway
*Central Corridor Expressway (included the Bronx-White Plains and White Plains-Mahopac Expressways)
*Cross County Parkway Extensions
*Garden State Parkway Extension
*Hudson River Expressway
*New Jersey Turnpike -- Northern Extension
*Northern Westchester Expressway
*Orange Expressway
*Ossining-South Salem Expressway
*Pearl River-Haverstraw Expressway
*Peekskill-Brewster Expressway
*Pelham-Port Chester Parkway
*Phelps Way
*Pound Ridge-Stamford Expressway
*Spring Valley Bypass
*A major 4-lane straightening and expansion of theHutchinson River Parkway in Eastchester through a park was put on indefinite hold after outcry from local residents in 1978 and 1979.Capital District
*Mid-Crosstown Arterial (US 9-9W)
*Northern Albany Expressway
*Southern Albany Expressway: A free connection between theAdirondack Northway and the Riverfront Route running parallel to theNew York State Thruway .
*Taconic State Parkway Extension
*Slingerlands Bypass.
*Interstate 88 Extension.Buffalo-Niagara Falls
Buffalo-Niagara Falls was also not immune to freeway revolts. An extensive system of highways and parkways were planned to be built in the counties of Niagara and Erie.
*Lake Ontario State Parkway Extension
*Robert Moses State Parkway Extension
*LaSalle Expressway This expressway was to be the beginning of the proposed Buffalo Beltway, which was never built except for the LaSalle and the short Milestrip Expressway (New York State Route 179 ) inBlasdell, New York .
*Interstate 990 was originally to extend all the way to Lockport, New York and eventually to Rochester, New York; instead, it terminates atNew York State Route 263 . Also, the expressway was planned to cross the east side of Buffalo, in a portion to be called the Crosstown Expressway; it would have terminated at the Niagara sectionInterstate 190 near the northern sections of South Buffalo.
*New York State Route 5 (Southshore Expressway) expressway section toNew York State Route 75 .
*New York State Route 33 (Kensington Expressway) extension to the Outer Beltway. Also West Side Arterial toInterstate 190 in Downtown Buffalo.
*New York State Route 400 Extension fromNew York State Route 16 To Erie County Line and possibly toOlean, New York .
*Gowanda ExpresswayAngola, New York toGowanda, New York .
*North Park Expressway FromInterstate 190 toNew York State Route 33 in North Buffalo.
*East Side ArterialNew York State Route 33 toInterstate 90 New York State Thruway.
*Lancaster ExpresswayInterstate 90 toUS Route 20 .
*River Road Expressway Buffalo Beltway in Niagara Falls to South Grand Island Bridges.
*Tonawnada Expressway (Todays Twin Cities Memorial HighwayNew York State Route 425 ) Creating a freeway instead of an arterial fromInterstate 290 to the Buffalo Beltway.
*Tuscarora Expressway An outer Beltway for the City of Niagara Falls from Tonawanda Expressway toRobert Moses State Parkway .
*Inner Belt Parkway
*Outer Belt ParkwayOther Regions
*Watertown-Champlain Expressway
Ohio
In 1964 and 1965, the State of
Ohio proposed three freeways that would dissect Cleveland’s eastern suburbs and parkland including Cleveland Heights, Shaker Heights and East Cleveland. The Clark Freeway was to connect I-271 with downtown Cleveland via Shaker Blvd, the Shaker Lakes, North Park Blvd and East Cleveland. The Lee Freeway was to run north from an interchange with the Clark Highway at Shaker Lakes over Lee Rd to a third highway that would run east-west approximately where Monticello Blvd and Wilson Mills Rd are today. Local residents blocked all three highways. One of several key actions was the 1966 formation of theNature Center at Shaker Lakes .Cincinnati also had a freeway revolt: the Colerain, Queen City and Taft Expressways were never built (though a particularly congested segment of Queen City Avenue was eventually bypassed in 2005) and the Red Bank Expressway, designed as a freeway connection between
Interstate 71 andU.S. Route 50 , was built instead as a surface artery, albeit with limited intersections. There are prominent ramp stubs at the interchange ofInterstate 74 and Beekman Street that would have connected I-74 to the Colerain Expressway.In addition, the Cross County Highway, which was designed to connect the eastern and western sides of I-275 through Hamilton County, was built, but never fully completed. For years, the highway existed in two separate segments; the eastern segment was built between Galbraith Road and Montgomery Road (just east of I-71) in the late 1950s and early 1960s. In the mid-1970s, the western stretch was built from Colerain Avenue (U.S. Route 27) to the western side of I-275. While these segments were finally connected in 1997, and the highway was renamed the Ronald Reagan Highway, the three-mile stretch between Montgomery Rd. and the eastern side of I-275 was never built due to protests from wealthy residents of The Village of Indian Hill, who convinced officials to stop the highway's construction from occurring in the city. This resulted in the lack of a direct freeway connection between existing Interstate 74 and its proposed extension along
Ohio State Route 32 to the east toward the Carolinas.Oregon
Portland
Shortly after World War II, the city leaders of
Portland, Oregon commissioned famed transportation plannerRobert Moses to design a freeway network for the city. Moses produced a proposal which called for numerous freeways to crisscross the city; of this proposal six freeway routes made it to the planning stage. Four of the six were eventually constructed (in some cases in the face of intense opposition); these are:* The "Banfield Freeway" (Interstate 84)
* The "Baldock Freeway" (Interstate 5 )
* The "Stadium Freeway" (Interstate 405)
* The "East Portland Freeway" (Interstate 205)However, two other planned freeways—the Interstate 505 freeway, and the
Mount Hood Freeway , were far more controversial. Each proposed route cut through established city neighborhoods. An intense battle arose over the Mount Hood Freeway, a proposed routing ofU.S. Highway 26 and Interstate 84 (then 80N) that stretched from theMarquam Bridge out to the city of Sandy at the base ofMount Hood . One section of the freeway—anexpressway stretch between Sandy and Gresham with an uncompleted interchange—was built; but the remainder was controversial.The 1972 mayoral race, with
Neil Goldschmidt representing the anti-freeway side andFrank Ivancie representing the supporters of the freeway, became a de-facto referendum on the proposed route. The election was won by Goldschmidt and the freeway was canceled. The proposed federal funds for the project were instead made available for a plannedlight rail line, built in the 1980s to connect Portland with Gresham and now part of theMAX Blue Line . This light-rail network is steadily expanding, including sections along Interstate 205 in room that resulted from the controversy.Soon after, the Interstate 505 proposal was also canceled; a shorter freeway "stub" was built instead, and
U.S. Highway 30 was routed on a new alignment through an industrial area (and away from the residential neighborhood that its prior alignment—and the I-505 proposal—ran through).In addition to the cancellation of three proposed freeway routes, Portland saw another milestone in the freeway revolts: the destruction of an already-existing freeway. The first freeway to be built through the city—
Harbor Drive (along the western shore of theWillamette River ), which was, at the time, the route ofOregon Route 99W —was demolished and replaced withTom McCall Waterfront Park . 99W was moved onto nearby Front Avenue (the stretch of 99W through Portland would be later decommissioned), and little evidence remains that there was once a freeway along the waterfront. (It should be noted that the removal of Harbor Drive wasn't all that controversial; the recent construction of I-5 on the river's East Bank, and I-405 through the downtown core, had made Harbor Drive no longer necessary.)Elsewhere in Oregon
Other Oregon freeway revolts occurred in Salem and Eugene. In Salem, the Interstate 305 project was shelved and replaced with the Salem Parkway, a highway along the same alignment but with at-grade intersections. In Eugene, the Roosevelt Freeway and
West Eugene Parkway projects were canceled [ [http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/REGION2/wep.shtml Northwest Region- Region 2 West Eugene Parkway Project ] ] , and the Belt Line Road was severely curtailed; only the northwestern segment of the proposedbeltway was ever built.Pennsylvania
There were plans for the Cobbs Creek Expressway, which would've started at Interstate 95 and run up the western edge of Philadelphia, along with the Crosstown Expressway, which would have connected back to I-95 near downtown. Both freeways were part of a planned routing of Interstate 695. Because of community opposition, neither freeway was constructed. (Additionally, the position of the Crosstown Expressway portion of I-695 between the Schuylkill and Vine Street Expressways would be considered redundant, particularly because of its close proximity to the Vine Street Expressway.) Also, the Roosevelt Expressway was planned to extend from the
Schuylkill Expressway to Northeast Philadelphia (only a small portion of this freeway was actually built; the rest is an at-grade boulevard), and an Interstate 895 was planned to connect the Philadelphia suburbs ofBristol, Pennsylvania andBurlington, New Jersey .A freeway revolt also occurred in Pittsburgh, where stub ramps near the
Birmingham Bridge exist from the cancellation of the unbuilt Oakland Crosstown Freeway. Other canceled freeways include the South Hills Expressway, Pittsburgh-McKeesport Expressway, and the East Liberty Expressway.A section of
Pennsylvania Route 23 was once planned for an expressway upgrade, and construction actually started on the expressway, but lack of funding at the state level halted construction. The grading and several overpasses for the expressway still exist, but as a mostly-unpaved section that has since gained popularity as the "Goat Path Expressway". [ [http://www.roadfan.com/man4.html PA 23: The Goat Path (The Proposed Lancaster-Norristown Expressway)] ] As of|2008, the route is still under consideration by PennDOT, and appears in the Commonwealth 12-Year Transportation Plan. [ [http://www.paroute23.com/about_project/history.htm PA 23 EIS (PennDOT] ]Tennessee
Interstate 40 was planned to go through Memphis's Overton Park but public opposition, combined with a court victory by opponents, forced abandonment of the plans. The eastern portion of the road had already been built inside the Interstate 240 loop and this non-interstate highway is now named Sam Cooper Boulevard while the northern portion of the I-240 loop was redesignated as I-40.Washington
The R.H. Thomson Expressway, connecting
Interstate 90 to State Route 520 through the Central District, Madison Valley, andWashington Park Arboretum , and the Bay Freeway, connectingInterstate 5 to State Route 99 in South Lake Union nearSeattle Center , faced mounting protests beginning in 1969. The death of these two highways is generally considered to be the 1972 referendum that withdrew their funding. [http://www.historylink.org/essays/output.cfm?file_id=3114 HistoryLink Essay 3114]Washington, DC
Plans to build
Interstate 270 (Maryland) ,Interstate 95 , andInterstate 66 , as well as a proposedInterstate 266 over a new Three Sisters Bridge through Washington, DC and the Maryland and Virginia suburbs were canceled due to public opposition. This is why Interstate 395 ends at New York Avenue and Interstate 95 goes around the Capital Beltway rather than cutting through the city.Funds for several of these projects were redirected to the
Washington Metro .Wisconsin
In
Milwaukee , several planned freeways were either never built, partially built, or partially built but subsequently demolished and replaced with an at-grade boulevard.* The
Lake Freeway was designed to be the eastern leg of an inner loop around downtown Milwaukee, to extend along the lakefront south from thePark Freeway to Bay View and southeastern Milwaukee and thence through the southeastern suburbs, with a proposed extension to run much further south, through central Racine and Kenosha,Wisconsin , continuing further south through Chicago's northeastern lakefrontsuburb s, where a portion of the proposed freeway was actually constructed and is, today, the Interstate-standard section ofLake Shore Drive . BesidesLake Shore Drive in Chicago, the only portion of this system that is completed to Interstate standards is a 2-mile portion ofInterstate 794 , although a portion of the route south of the official southern terminus of Interstate 794 continues as 4-lane divided controlled-access freeway, as Highway 794, or theLake Parkway .* The northern end of the Lake Freeway turned westward, and this section became known as the
Park Freeway . This was the northern leg of the inner loop. The eastern section was known as thePark East Freeway and the western section as thePark West Freeway , with the dividing point at the intersection withI-43 . The Park West Freeway was intended to run northwesterly along Fond du Lac Avenue, and then turn westward just north of North Avenue. A major intersection with the Stadium Freeway was planned for the area around 45th and North Avenue. The right-of-way for the entire corridor was cleared. Due to neighborhood opposition, the only section of this freeway completed was from Milwaukee Street to Walnut Street. The above-grade section between Milwaukee Street and 6th Street was removed and replaced by an at-grade boulevard - McKinley Boulevard. Part of this corridor remains vacant, but most of the corridor has been developed or has development plans in place.* The Stadium Freeway was partially completed. The original plan was for its south end to be at
I-894 /I-43 near Loomis Road. From that point it would extend northward, intersectingI-94 at theStadium Interchange and proceeding northward to its intersection with thePark Freeway . From there it would jog northwesterly until heading north, parallelling 60th Street and continuing north to Port Washington where it met withI-43 . The only section built was that between National Avenue and Lisbon Avenue, today'sUS 41 .* Another planned freeway was the
Bay Freeway . This was to be the northern bypass around the central city, complementingI-894 which is the built southern bypass. The Bay Freeway eastern point was I-43 at Hampton Road. The freeway was to run over Hampton Road, westward to the intersection with theStadium Freeway and theFond du Lac Freeway . From there it continued westward toPewaukee where it would meet withWisconsin Highway 16 . No section of the Bay Freeway was ever built.* The
Belt Freeway was to be a freeway encircling the metro Milwaukee area on the south, west and north sides. No section of the Belt Freeway was ever built.Notes
References
* [http://juh.sagepub.com/cgi/content/short/30/5/674 "Stop the Road: Freeway Revolts in American Cities", Raymond A. Mohl "Journal of Urban History".2004; 30: 674-706]
* [http://www.junkscience.com/apr99/trafhell.html "EPA's highway to traffic hell?" Taxes Fund Groups Trying To Halt Road Projects, by Daniel J. Murphy (Junkscience.com)] Originally published in Investor's Business Daily; April 5, 1999.Cleveland
* [http://chuh.net/chhistory/features/freeways.html The Clark, Lee and Heights Freeways]
* [http://www.arcadiapublishing.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=arcadia&Product_Code=0738523844 Cleveland Heights: The Making of an Urban Suburb] , by Marian J. Morton, Arcadia Publishing, 2002. (Describes the history of the Clark and Lee Freeway projects and their defeat.)Milwaukee
* [http://www.wisconsinhighways.org/milwaukee/index.html Milwaukee's Freeways]
Atlanta
* [http://www.southeastroads.com/psr/ga414_profile.htm Ga. Highway 414/Interstate 420]
New Jersey
* [http://www.nycroads.com/roads/unbuilt_NJ/ Unbuilt Roads of New Jersey @ NYCROADS.com]
New York
* [http://www.nycroads.com/roads/unbuilt_NYC/ Unbuilt Roads in New York City] (NYCROADS.com)
* [http://www.nycroads.com/roads/unbuilt_LI/ Unbuilt Roads on Long Island] (NYCROADS.com)
* [http://www.nycroads.com/roads/unbuilt_hudson/ Unbuilt Roads in the Hudson Valley] (NYCROADS.com)Oregon
* [http://www.angelfire.com/or3/oroads/roads/mthood/index.html The Mount Hood Freeway]
* [http://www.ylekot.com/orehwys/hwy-26.html "Oregon Highways: US Highway 26"]
* [http://www.wweek.com/story.php?story=6110 "Willamette Week": "Highway to Hell"]
* [http://www.pdxplan.org/pages/DaveHupp.html Interview with David Hupp] (an advisor to theMultnomah County commission who was instrumental in cancelling the Mount Hood Freeway).
*cite web
title=Interstate 50th Anniversary: The story of Oregon's Interstates
author=George Kramer
publisher=Oregon Department of Transportation
url=http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/COMM/docs/Oregon_Interstate_Background.pdfPennsylvania
* [http://www.phillyroads.com/roads/unbuilt_PA/ Unbuilt Roads of Pennsylvania] (Phillyroads.com)
*Pennsylvania Highways
** [http://www.pahighways.com/interstates/pdi.html Pennsylvania's Decommissioned Interstates]
** [http://www.pahighways.com/interstates/ybproposals.html Yellow Book Interstate Proposals]an Francisco
* [http://www.bikesummer.org/1999/zine/freewayRevolt.htm The Freeway Revolt, from bikesummer.org]
* [http://www.sfbg.com/38/26/cover_freeway.html The Great Freeway Revolt, from the San Francisco Bay Guardian]
* [http://www.mistersf.com/notorious/index.html?notfreeway.htm Freeway Revolt from misterSF.com]
* [http://sfcityscape.com/features/freeway_map.html San Francisco CITYSCAPE]
* [http://www.cahighways.org/maps-sf-fwy.html The History of San Francisco Bay Area Freeway Development] (California Highways.org)Connecticut
* [http://us-7.tripod.com/ Route 7 Coalition]
* [http://www.route7.org/ Committee to Extend Route 7]
* [http://www.nycroads.com/roads/unbuilt_CT/ Unbuilt Roads in Connecticut @ NYCROADS.com]Maryland
* [http://www.roadstothefuture.com/Balt_City_Interstates.html Baltimore City Interstates @ Roads to the Future]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.