Space habitat

A pair of O'Neill cylinders

Interior of a torus station

A space habitat (also called an orbital colony, or a space colony, city, or settlement) is a space station intended as a permanent settlement^{[not verified in body]} rather than as a simple waystation or other specialized facility. No space habitats have yet been constructed, but many design proposals have been made with varying degrees of realism by both engineers and science fiction authors.

History

Description of a rotating wheel space station in Hermann Noordung's The Problem of Space Travel (1929)

About 1970, near the end of Project Apollo, Gerard K. O'Neill, an experimental physicist, was looking for a topic to tempt his physics students, most of whom were freshmen in Engineering. He hit upon the creative idea of assigning them feasibility calculations for large space habitats. To his surprise, the habitats seemed to be feasible even in very large sizes: cylinders five miles (8 km) in diameter and twenty miles (34 km) long, even if made from ordinary materials such as steel and glass. Also, the students solved problems such as radiation protection from cosmic rays (almost free in the larger sizes), getting naturalistic sun angles, provision of power, realistic pest-free farming and orbital attitude control without reaction motors. O'Neill published an article about these colony proposals in Physics Today in 1974.^{[citation needed]} (See the above illustration of such a colony, a classic "O'Neill Colony"). The article was expanded in his 1976 book The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space.

The result motivated NASA to sponsor a couple of summer workshops led by Dr. O'Neill.^[1][2] Several designs were studied, some in depth, with sizes ranging from 1,000 to 10,000,000 people.^{[3][Full citation needed]}

At the time, colonization was definitely seen as an end in itself. The basic proposal by O'Neill had an example of a payback scheme: construction of solar power satellites from lunar materials. O'Neill's intention was not to build solar power satellites as such, but rather to give an existence proof that orbital manufacturing from lunar materials could generate profits. He, and other participants, presumed that once such manufacturing facilities were on-line, many profitable uses for them would be found, and the colony would become self-supporting, and begin to build other colonies as well.

The proposals and studies generated a notable groundswell of public interest. One effect of this expansion was the founding of the L5 Society in the U.S., a group of enthusiasts that desired to build and live in such colonies. The group was named after the space-colony orbit which was then believed to be the most profitable, a kidney-shaped orbit around either of Earth's lunar Lagrange points 5 or 4.

Interior view of "Rama", a mobile cylindrical habitat in Arthur C. Clarke's Rendezvous with Rama series

In this era, Dr. O'Neill also founded the quieter, and more targeted Space Studies Institute, which initially funded and constructed prototypes of much of the radically new hardware needed for a space colonization effort, as well as number of paper studies of feasibility. One of the early projects, for instance, was a series of functional prototypes of a mass driver, the essential technology to be used to move ores economically from the Moon to space colony orbits.

The space habitats have inspired a large number of fictional societies in Science Fiction. Some of the most popular and recognizable are the Japanese Gundam universe, and Babylon 5.

Motivation

Several motivations for building space colonies have been proposed: survival, security, energy, raw materials and money.^{[citation needed]}

Space habitats are immune to most of the natural disasters that plague the Earth, such as earthquakes, volcanoes, hurricanes, floods and tornadoes. A space habitat can be the passenger compartment of a large spacecraft for colonizing asteroids, moons, distant stars or other planets (see: Space and survival). Spreading our population out into multiple self-sufficient space habitats across the Solar System will increase our odds of survival, a possible ruin of the Earth's population as a whole not dooming all our species, any more.^[4]

Space is literally filled with light produced from the Sun. In Earth orbit, this amounts to 1400 watts of power per square meter.^[5] This energy can be used to produce electricity from solar cells or heat engine based power stations, process ores, provide light for plants to grow and to warm space colonies, or to heat cold planets (Mars).

Most asteroids are a mixture of the aforementioned materials, virtually all stable elements on the periodic table can be found in the asteroids and comets^{[citation needed]} and more importantly, because these bodies do not have substantial gravity wells, it is very easy to draw materials from them and haul them to a construction site.^{[6][Full citation needed]}

There is estimated to be enough material in the main asteroid belt alone to build enough space habitats to equal the habitable surface area of 3,000 Earths.^[7]

Power generation

Colonies would have constant access to solar energy up to very large distances from the Sun. Weightlessness allows the construction of large flimsy structures such as mirrors for concentrating sunlight.^{[citation needed]}

Resources

Space habitats may be supplied with resources from extraterrestrial places like Mars, asteroids, or the Moon (in-situ resource utilization [ISRU];^[4] see Asteroid mining). One could produce breathing oxygen, drinking water, and rocket fuel with the help of ISRU.^[4] It may become possible to manufacture solar panels from Lunar materials.^[4]

Population

Habitats may be constructed to give an immense total population capacity. Using the free-floating resources of the solar system, current estimates extend into the trillions.^[8]

Trade

Earth to space habitat trade would be easier than Earth to planetary colony trade, as colonies orbiting Earth will not have a gravity well to overcome to export to Earth, and a smaller gravity well to overcome to import from Earth.

Initial capital outlay

Even the smallest of the habitat designs mentioned below is more massive than the total mass of all items ever launched by mankind into Earth orbit.^{[citation needed]} Prerequisites to building habitats are either cheaper launch costs or a mining and manufacturing base on the Moon or other body having low delta-v from the desired habitat location.^{[9][Full citation needed]}

Internal life support systems

Air pressure, with normal partial pressures of oxygen, carbon dioxide and nitrogen, is a basic requirement of any space habitat.^{[citation needed]} Basically, most space colony designs propose large, thin-walled pressure vessels. The required oxygen could be obtained from lunar rock. Nitrogen is most easily available from the Earth, but is also recycled nearly perfectly. Also, nitrogen in the form of ammonia may be obtainable from comets and the moons of outer planets. Nitrogen may also be available in unknown quantities on certain other bodies in the outer solar system. The air of a colony could be recycled in a number of ways. The most obvious method is to use photosynthetic gardens, possibly via hydroponics or forest gardening.^{[citation needed]} However, these do not remove certain industrial pollutants, such as volatile oils, and excess simple molecular gases. The standard method used on nuclear submarines, a similar form of closed environment, is to use a catalytic burner, which effectively removes most organics. Further protection might be provided by a small cryogenic distillation system which would gradually remove impurities such as mercury vapor, and noble gases that cannot be catalytically burned.^{[citation needed]}

Organic materials for food production would also need to be provided. At first, most of these would have to be imported from the moon, asteroids, or the Earth. After that, recycling should reduce the need for imports. One proposed recycling method would start by burning the cryogenic distillate, plants, garbage and sewage with air in an electric arc, and distilling the result.^{[citation needed]} The resulting carbon dioxide and water would be immediately usable in agriculture. The nitrates and salts in the ash could be dissolved in water and separated into pure minerals. Most of the nitrates, potassium and sodium salts would effectively recycle as fertilizers. Other minerals containing iron, nickel, and silicon could be chemically purified in batches and reused industrially. The small fraction of remaining materials, well below 0.01% by weight, could be processed into pure elements with zero-gravity mass spectrometry, and added in appropriate amounts to the fertilizers and industrial stocks. This method's only current existence is a proof considered by NASA studies.^{[citation needed]} It's likely that methods would be greatly refined as people began to actually live in space habitats.

Artificial gravity

Main article: Artificial gravity

Long-term on-orbit studies have proven that zero gravity weakens bones and muscles, and upsets calcium metabolism and immune systems. Most people have a continual stuffy nose or sinus problems, and a few people have dramatic, incurable motion sickness. Most colony designs would rotate in order to use inertial forces to simulate gravity. NASA studies with chickens and plants have proven that this is an effective physiological substitute for gravity.^{[citation needed]} Turning one's head rapidly in such an environment causes a "tilt" to be sensed as one's inner ears move at different rotational rates. Centrifuge studies show that people get motion-sick in habitats with a rotational radius of less than 100 metres, or with a rotation rate above 3 rotations per minute. However, the same studies and statistical inference indicate that almost all people should be able to live comfortably in habitats with a rotational radius larger than 500 meters and below 1 RPM. Experienced persons were not merely more resistant to motion sickness, but could also use the effect to determine "spinward" and "antispinward" directions in the centrifuges.^{[citation needed]}

Protection from hostile external environment

• Radiation: Studies have shown that large space habitats could be effectively shielded from gamma rays by their structure and air and that these could in the case of large habitats substitute the wall of two meters of steel that would be needed without them.^{[citation needed]} Smaller habitats could be shielded by stationary (nonrotating) bags of rock. Sunlight could be admitted indirectly via mirrors in radiation-proof louvres, which would function in the same manner as a periscope. If the space habitat is located at L4 or L5, then its orbit will take it outside of the protection of the Earth's magnetosphere for approximately two-thirds of the time (as happens with the Moon), putting residents at risk of proton exposure from the solar wind.

See Health threat from cosmic rays

• Heat rejection: The colony is in a vacuum, and therefore resembles a giant thermos bottle. The sunlight to radiated energy ratio can be reduced and controlled with large venetian blinds. Habitats also need a radiator to eliminate heat from absorbed sunlight and organisms. Very small habitats might have a central vane that rotates with the colony. In this design, convection would raise hot air "up" (toward the center), and cool air would fall down into the outer habitat. Some other designs would distribute coolants, such as chilled water from a central radiator.

• Foreign objects: The habitat would need to withstand potential impacts from space debris, meteoroids, dust, etc. Radar will sweep the space around each habitat mapping the trajectory of debris and other man-made objects and allowing corrective actions to be taken to protect the habitat. Meteoroid strikes would pose a risk to a space habitat much stronger than they do to the Earth, unless there should be developed a method to avert them, because a space habitat does not possess a sheltering atmosphere.

Transportation and maneuvering

• Orbital stationkeeping: The optimal habitat orbits are still debated, and so orbital stationkeeping is probably a commercial issue. The lunar L₄ and L₅ orbits are now thought to be too far away from the moon and Earth. A more modern proposal is to use a two-to-one resonance orbit that alternately has a close, low-energy (cheap) approach to the moon, and then to the Earth. This provides quick, inexpensive access to both raw materials and the major market. Most colony designs plan to use electromagnetic tether propulsion, or mass drivers used as rocket motors. The advantage of these is that they either use no reaction mass at all, or use cheap reaction mass.^{[citation needed]}

• Attitude control: Most mirror geometries require something on the habitat to be aimed at the sun and so attitude control is necessary. The original O'Neill design used the two cylinders as momentum wheels to roll the colony, and pushed the sunward pivots together or apart to use precession to change their angle. Later designs rotated in the plane of their orbit, with their windows pointing at right angles to the sunlight, and used lightweight mirrors that could be steered with small electric motors to follow the sun.^{[citation needed]}

Designs/solutions

NASA designs

Designs proposed in NASA studies included:

• Bernal sphere: "Island One", a spherical habitat for about 20,000 people.
• Stanford torus: A larger alternative to "Island One."
• O'Neill cylinder: "Island Three" (pictured), the largest design.
• Lewis One^[10]: A cylinder of radius 250m with a non rotating radiation shielding. The shielding protects the micro-gravity industrial space, too. The rotating part is 450m long and has several inner cylinders. Some of them are used for agriculture.
• Kalpana One, revised^[11]: A short cylinder with 250 m radius and 325 m length. The radiation shielding is 10 t/m² and rotates. It has several inner cylinders for agriculture and recreaction.
• A "bola": a spacecraft or habitat connected by a cable to a counterweight or other habitat. This design has been proposed as a Mars ship, initial construction shack for a space habitat, and orbital hotel. It has a comfortably long and slow rotational radius for a relatively small station mass. Also, if some of the equipment can form the counter-weight, the equipment dedicated to artificial gravity is just a cable, and thus has a much smaller mass-fraction than in other designs. This makes it a tempting design for a deep-space ship. For a long-term habitation, however, radiation shielding must rotate with the habitat, and is extremely heavy, thus requiring a much stronger and heavier cable.^{[citation needed]}
• "Beaded habitats"^[12]: This speculative design was also considered by the NASA studies, and found to have a roughly equivalent mass fraction of structure^{[clarification needed]} and therefore comparable^{[clarification needed]} costs. Small habitats would be mass-produced to standards that allow the habitats to interconnect. A single habitat can operate alone as a bola. However, further habitats can be attached, to grow into a "dumbbell" then a "bow-tie," then a ring, then a cylinder of "beads," and finally a framed array of cylinders. Each stage of growth shares more radiation shielding and capital equipment, increasing redundancy and safety while reducing the cost per person. This design was originally proposed by a professional architect because it can grow much like Earth-bound cities, with incremental individual investments, unlike designs that require large start-up investments. The main disadvantage is that the smaller versions use a large amount of structure to support the radiation shielding, which rotates with them. In large sizes, the shielding becomes economical, because it grows roughly as the square of the colony radius. The number of people, their habitats and the radiators to cool them grow roughly as the cube of the colony radius.^[13]
• Nautilus-X Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle (MMSEV): this 2011 NASA proposal for a long-duration crewed space transport vehicle included an artificial gravity space habitat intended to promote crew-health for a crew of up to six persons on missions of up to two years duration. The partial-g torus-ring centrifuge would utilize both standard metal-frame and inflatable spacecraft structures and would provide 0.11 to 0.69g if built with the 40 feet (12 m) diameter option.^[14][15][16] As of 2011^[update], developing and assembling the NAUTILUS-X "would take at least five years and require two or three rocket launches. It would cost about $3.7 billion."^[17] NASA has released a short animation of NAUTILUS-X in space; the link is included in the External links section below.

• ISS Centrifuge Demo: Also proposed in 2011 as a demonstration project preparatory to the final design of the larger torus centrifuge space habitat for the Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle. The structure would have an outside diameter of 30 feet (9.1 m) with a 30 inches (760 mm) ring interior cross-section diameter and would provide 0.08 to 0.51g partial gravity. This test and evaluation centrifuge would have the capability to become a Sleep Module for ISS crew.^[14]

Gallery

• 

  Bola space station

• 

  Bola Mars spacecraft

• 

  Beaded habitats evolution

Bubbleworld

The Bubbleworld or Inside/Outside concept was originated in 1964 by Dandridge M. Cole and Donald W. Cox in a nonfiction book, Islands in Space: The Challenge of the Planetoids.^[18]

The concept calls for drilling a tunnel through the longest axis of a large asteroid of iron or nickel-iron composition and filling it with a volatile substance, possibly water. A very large solar reflector would be constructed nearby, focusing solar heat onto the asteroid, first to weld and seal the tunnel ends, then more diffusely to slowly heat the entire outer surface. As the metal softens, the water inside expands and inflates the mass, while rotational forces help shape it into a cylindrical form. Once expanded and allowed to cool, it can be spun to produce artificial gravity, and the interior filled with soil, air and water. By creating a slight bulge in the middle of the cylinder, a ring-shaped lake can be made to form. Reflectors will allow sunlight to enter and to be directed where needed. Clearly, this method would require a significant human and industrial presence in space to be at all feasible.

The Bubbleworld concept was popularized by science fiction author Larry Niven in his fictional Known Space stories, describing such worlds as the primary habitats of the Belters, a civilization who had colonized the Asteroid Belt.

Hypothetical designs

In the 1990s, as the potential usefulness of carbon nanotubes as structural material became apparent, proposals were advanced for much larger habitats taking advantage of this material. The technology to produce nanotubes of the required length is not available, so these designs remain speculative.

• Bishop ring^[19]: A torus 1000 km in radius, 500 km in width, and with atmosphere retention walls 200 km in height. The design would be large enough that it could be "roofless", open to space on the inner rim.
• McKendree cylinder^[20]: Paired cylinders in the same vein as the O'Neill cylinder/Island Three design, each 460 km in radius and 4600 km long (versus 3.2 km radius and 32 km long in the Island Three design).

Bigelow Commercial Space Station

The Bigelow Next-Generation Commercial Space Station was announced in mid-2010.^[21] The initial build-out of the station is expected in 2014/2015, and will consist of two Sundancer modules and one BA-330 module.^[22] Bigelow has publicly shown space station design configurations with up to nine BA-300 modules containing 100,000 cu ft (2,800 m³) of habitable space^[23] Bigelow began to publicly refer to the initial configuration—two Sundancer modules and one BA-330 module—as "Space Complex Alpha" in October 2010.^[24]

Bigelow recently announced that it has agreements with six sovereign states to utilize on-orbit facilities of the commercial space station: United Kingdom, Netherlands, Australia, Singapore, Japan and Sweden.^[23]

See also

• Generation ship
• Human outpost (artificially created controlled human habitat)
• Inflatable space habitat
• Mars to Stay
• Space manufacturing
• Space stations and habitats in popular culture
• The Brick Moon
• Transhab

Notes

1. ^ "Space Settlements: A Design Study". 1975. http://www.nas.nasa.gov/About/Education/SpaceSettlement/75SummerStudy/Table_of_Contents1.html. Retrieved 2006-12-18. 
2. ^ "Ames Summer Study on Space Settlements and Industrialization Using Nonterrestial Materials". 1977. http://space.alglobus.net/spaceres/toc.html. Retrieved 2006-05-28. 
3. ^ Pournelle, Jerrold E., Dr. A Step Farther Out; O'Neill, Gerard K., Dr. The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space (New York: William Morrow & Company, 1977); Heppenheimer, Fred, Dr. Habitats in Space.
4. ^ ^{a b c d} James Doehring, Michael Anissimov et al: Lifeboat Foundation Space Habitats. Spacefuture.com, 2002-2011, retrieved June 29, 2011
5. ^ G. Kopp; J. Lean (2011). "A new, lower value of total solar irradiance: Evidence and climate significance". Geophys. Res. Lett.: L01706. doi:10.1029/2010GL045777. 
6. ^ Pournelle, Jerrold E., Dr. A Step Farther Out; O'Neill, Gerard K., Dr. The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space (New York: William Morrow & Company, 1977); Heppenheimer, Fred, Dr. Habitats in Space.
7. ^ "Space Settlements: A Design Study (Chapter 7)". 1975. http://settlement.arc.nasa.gov/75SummerStudy/Chapt7.html#LIM. Retrieved 2010-08-12. 
8. ^ O'Neill, Gerard K. The colonization of space, (Physics Today, September 1974). Retrieved on 2006-10-15.
9. ^ Pournelle, Jerrold E., Dr. A Step Farther Out; O'Neill, Gerard K., Dr. The High Frontier: Human Colonies in Space (New York: William Morrow & Company, 1977); Heppenheimer, Fred, Dr. Habitats in Space.
10. ^ Globus, Al. "Lewis One Space Colony". http://alglobus.net/NASAwork/papers/RNR-91-018/RNR-91-018.html. Retrieved 2006-05-28. 
11. ^ Globus, Al. "The Kalpana One Orbital Space Settlement Revised". http://www.nss.org/settlement/space/2007KalpanaOne.pdf. Retrieved 2009-08-29. 
12. ^ "A Minimized Techological Approach towards Human Self Sufficiency off Earth". http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070032685_2007018823.pdf. Retrieved 2010-12-18. 
13. ^ Curreri, Peter A. (2207). A minimized technological approach towards human self sufficiency off Earth. (pdf format) Space Technology and Applications International Forum (STAIF) Conference, Albuquerque, NM, 11-15 Feb. 2007.
14. ^ ^{a b} NAUTILUS-X: Multi-Mission Space Exploration Vehicle, Mark L. Holderman, Future in Space Operations (FISO) Colloquium, 2011-01-26, accessed 2011-01-31.
15. ^ NASA NAUTILUS-X: multi-mission exploration vehicle includes centrifuge, which would be tested at ISS, RLV and Space Transport News, 2011-01-28, accessed 2011-01-31.
16. ^ "Nautilus X MMSEV Is More Outside-the-Box Space Thinking from NASA". YahooNews. 2011-01-28. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110128/sc_ac/7725094_nautilus_x_mmsev_is_more_outsidethebox_space_thinking_from_nasa. Retrieved 2011-02-13. 
17. ^ Boyle, Rebecca (2011-02-14). "New NASA Designs for a Reusable Manned Deep-Space Craft, Nautilus-X". Popular Science. http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-02/new-nasa-reusable-spacecraft-concept-could-serve-multiple-missions-future. Retrieved 2011-02-15. "Construction would take at least five years and require two or three rocket launches. It would cost about $3.7 billion." 
18. ^ Cole, Dandridge M.; Cox, Donald W. (1964). Islands in space: The challenge of the planetoids. http://www.amazon.com/Islands-space-planetoids-Dandridge-Cole/dp/B0007DZSR0. 
19. ^ Institute of Atomic-Scale Engineering: Open Air Space Habitats
20. ^ Implications of Molecular Nanotechnology Technical Performance Parameters on Previously Defined Space System Architectures
21. ^ Bigelow Aerospace — Next-Generation Commercial Space Stations: Orbital Complex Construction, Bigelow Aerospace, accessed 2010-07-15.
22. ^ Bigelow Marketing Inflatable Space Stations, Aviation Week, 2010-05-06, accessed 2010-10-30.
23. ^ ^{a b} Bigelow Aerospace Shows Off Bigger, Badder Space Real Estate, Popular Mechanics, 2010-10-28, accessed 2010-10-30.
24. ^ Bigelow still thinks big, The Space Review, 2010-11-01, accessed 2010-11-02.

References

• NASA's table of contents for the studies See the "online books" about half-way down the page.

External links

• Lifeboat Foundation Space Habitats, a space habitat advocacy group.
• Paul Lucas (2005), Homesteading the High Frontier: The Shape of Space Stations to Come, Strange Horizons
• NASA animation of NAUTILUS-X in space
• NPR visualization of a large-colony space habitat, May 2011.