Infobox Space station
station = "Skylab"
station_image_caption = A view of Skylab from the departing
insignia = Skylab_Patch.png
sign = Skylab
crew = 3
launch_pad = LC-39A,
Kennedy Space Center
mass = 77,088
volume = 10,000 ft³
perigee = 269.7
miles (434 km)
apogee = 274.6 miles (442 km)
inclination = 50 degrees
period = 93.4
orbits_day = 15.4
in_orbit = 2,249 days
occupied = 171 days
orbits = 34,981
distance = ~890,000,000 miles
NSSDC_ID = 1973-027A
as_of = deorbit on
configuration_caption = Skylab configuration with docked
Apollo Command/Service Module
Skylab was the first
space stationthe United States launched into orbit, and the second space station ever visited by a human crew. The 100 ton space station was in Earth's orbit from 1973 to 1979, and it was visited by crews three times in 1973 and 1974. It included a laboratory for studying the effects of microgravityand the Apollo Telescope Mountsolar observatory.
The origin of the project is difficult to pinpoint because a number of different but related proposals were floated by various NASA centers before Skylab itself was launched.
A key event took place in 1959, when
Wernher von Braunsubmitted his final Project Horizonplans to the US Army. The overall goal of Horizon was to place man on the moon, a mission that would soon be taken over by the rapidly-forming NASA. Although concentrating on the moon missions, von Braun also detailed an orbiting laboratory built out of a Horizon upper stage. This basic concept of re-using existing boosters would lead directly to a number of follow-on designs, and eventually the Skylab that actually flew.
In 1963, the
US Air Forcestarted development of the Manned Orbital Laboratory(MOL), a small space station primarily intended for photo reconnaissance using large telescopes directed by a two-man crew. It also had the designation KH-10 - Dorian. The station was the same diameter as a Titan IIupper stage. The stations were to be launched with the crew riding atop in a modified Gemini capsule with a hatch cut into the heat shieldon the bottom of the capsule. [ [http://www.astronautix.com/craft/mol.htm MOL (Manned Orbiting Laboratory) ] ] [ [http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/kh-10.htm KH-10, Dorian] ]
A number of NASA centers saw the MOL as something of a threat, and started back-room studies on various space station designs of their own.Fact|date=October 2007 Most of these were simply "
back of a napkin" type designs with no official backing. Studies generally looked at platforms launched by the Saturn V, followed up by crews launched on Saturn IBusing an Apollo Command and Service Module(CSM), or alternately Gemini capsule on a Titan II-C, the latter being much less expensive in the case where cargo was not needed.
But at the same time NASA was also looking for proposals for a major post-Apollo follow-on mission, including studies of a very large 24-man station with an operating lifetime of about five years.
Lockheed Martinwas involved in this project, and proposed a station that they felt would be a natural follow-on to the moon missions. One requirement for a permanent station would be periodic resupply, and for this role Lockheed suggested both Apollo-derived cargo vehicles and a new lifting bodycraft. After a lengthy and circuitous history, the new supply vehicle would emerge as the Space Shuttle, and their space station proposal as Space Station Freedom.
The Apollo Applications Program
In June 1964, NASA headquarters in Washington set up the Apollo Logistic Support System Office, originally intended to study various ways to modify the Apollo hardware for scientific missions. The office initially proposed a number of projects for direct scientific study, including an extended-stay lunar mission which required two Saturn V launchers, a "lunar truck" based on the
Lunar Module(LM), a large manned solar telescope using an LM as its crew quarters, and small space stations using a variety of LM or CSM-based hardware. Although it didn't look at the space station specifically, over the next two years the office would become increasingly dedicated to this role. In 1965 the office was renamed, becoming the Apollo Applications Program(AAP).
As part of their general work, in August 1964 MSC presented studies on an expendable lab known as Apollo "X", short for "Apollo Extension System". Apollo X replaced the LM carried on the top of the S-IVB stage with a small space station just larger than the CSM's service area, containing supplies and experiments for missions between 15 and 45 days' duration. Using this study as a baseline, a number of different mission profiles were looked at over the next six months.
Wernher von Braunproposed a more ambitious plan to build a much larger station. His design replaced the S-IVB stage of a complete Saturn Vwith an aeroshell, primarily as an adaptor for the CSM on top. Inside the shell was a cylindrical equipment section slightly smaller in diameter than the CSM. On reaching orbit, the S-II booster would be vented to remove any remaining hydrogen fuel, then the equipment section would be slid into it via a large inspection hatch. The station filled the entire interior of the S-II stage's hydrogen tank, with the equipment section forming a "spine" and living quarters between it and the walls of the booster. This would have resulted in a very large 33 x 45 foot living area. Power was to be provided by solar cells lining the outside of the S-II stage.
One problem with this proposal was that it required a dedicated Saturn V launch to fly the station. Engineers could not "piggyback" the station's launch on a lunar mission, which required a working S-IVB stage. At the time the design was being proposed, all of the then-contracted Saturn V's were already earmarked for moon launches. Further work led to the idea of launching a smaller station based on the S-IVB instead, launching it on a surplus
Saturn IB. Several planned Earth-orbit test missions for the LM and CSM had been canceled, leaving a number of Saturn IB's free for use.Since the Saturn I had a much lower throw weight capability, the S-IV stage could not be left empty; its thrust would be needed for the mission. This limitation led to the development of the wet workshopconcept, which led naturally out of von Braun's idea of using an existing stage after its fuel had burned off. However, in this case the station was to be built out of the S-IVB stage itself, as opposed to the S-II below it. A number of S-IVB-based stations were studied at MSC, but even the earliest, from mid-1965, had much in common with the Skylab design that actually flew. An airlock was placed in the equipment area immediately below where the LM sat on a moon mission, and a minimum amount of equipment was installed in the tank itself in order to avoid taking up too much fuel volume. After launch, a follow-up mission launched by a Saturn IB would carry up additional equipment in place of its LM, including solar panels, an equipment section and docking adaptor, and various experiments. Douglas Aircraft, builder of the S-IVB stage, was asked to prepare proposals along these lines.
1 April 1966, MSC sent out contracts to Douglas, Grumman, and McDonnell for conversion of a S-IVB spent stage under the name Saturn S-IVB spent-stage experiment support module (SSESM). In May the Apollo astronauts voiced concern over purging the stage's hydrogen tank in space. Nevertheless, in late July it was announced that the Orbital Workshop would be launched as a part of Apollo mission AS-209, originally one of the Earth-orbit CSM test launches, followed by two Saturn I/CSM crew launches, AAP-1 and AAP-2.
Design work continued over the next two years, in an era of shrinking budgets. In August 1967 NASA announced that the lunar mapping and base construction missions examined by the AAP were being canceled. Only the Earth-orbiting missions remained, namely the Orbital Workshop and Apollo Telescope Mount solar observatory. Later several Moon missions were canceled as well, originally to be Apollo missions 18 through 20. The cancellation of these missions freed up three Saturn V boosters for the AAP program. Although this would have allowed them to develop von Braun's original S-II based mission, by this time so much work had been done on the S-IV based design that work continued on this baseline. With the extra power available, the wet workshop was no longer needed; the S-IC and S-II lower stages could launch a "dry workshop" directly into orbit.
8 August 1969, McDonnell Douglasreceived a contract for the conversion of two existing S-IVB stages to the Orbital Workshop configuration. One of the S-IV test stages was shipped to McDonnell for the construction of a mockup in January 1970. The Orbital Workshop was renamed Skylab as a result of a NASA contest. The actual stage that flew was the upper stage of the AS-212 vehicle). The mission computer used aboard Skylab was the IBMSystem/4Pi TC-1, a relative of the AP-101Space Shuttle computers.
Skylab was launched
14 May 1973by a Saturn INT-21(a two-stage version of the Saturn V launch vehicle) into a 235 nautical mile (435 km) orbit. The launch is sometimes referred to as Skylab 1, or SL-1. Severe damage was sustained during launch, including the loss of the station's micrometeoroid shield/sun shade and one of its main solar panels. Debris from the lost micrometeoroid shield further complicated matters by pinning the remaining solar panel to the side of the station, preventing its deployment and thus leaving the station with a huge power deficit. The station underwent extensive repair during a spacewalkby the first crew, which launched on 25 May 1973(the SL-2 mission) atop a Saturn IB. If the crew had failed to repair Skylab in time, the plastic insulation inside the station would have melted, releasing poisonous gas and making Skylab completely uninhabitable. They stayed in orbit with Skylab for 28 days. Two additional missions followed on 28 July 1973(SL-3) and 16 November 1973(SL-4) with stay times of 59 and 84 days, respectively. The last Skylab crew returned to Earth on 8 February 1974.
Operations in orbit
Skylab orbited Earth 2,476 times during the 171 days and 13 hours of its occupation during the three manned Skylab missions. Astronauts performed ten
spacewalks totaling 42 hours 16 minutes. Skylab logged about 2,000 hours of scientific and medical experiments, including eight solar experiments. The Sun's coronal holeswere discovered thanks to these efforts. Many of the experiments conducted investigated the astronauts' adaptation to extended periods of microgravity. Each Skylab mission set a record for the amount of time astronauts spent in space.Fact|date=May 2008
End of Skylab
=Planned Fourth Mission (SL-5)=
This would have been a short 20 day mission to conduct scientific experiments and boost Skylab into a higher orbit. Astronauts
Vance Brand(commander), Don Lind(science pilot), and William B. Lenoir(command module pilot) would have been the crew for this mission, with Brand and Lind being the prime crew for the never-flown Skylab Rescueflights.
NASA considered use of the existing Apollo/Saturn material for launching a second
Skylab Bstation in May 1973, but decided to donate all the hardware to museums.
Planned shuttle missions
Following the last mission, Skylab was left in a
parking orbitexpected to last at least eight years. The Space Shuttlewas planned to dock with and elevate Skylab to a higher safe altitude in 1979; however, the shuttles were not able to launch until 1981. A planned unmanned satellite called the " Teleoperator" was to be launched to save Skylab, but funding never materialized.
Skylab was in need of a major overhaul, including new gyroscopes, and was low on fuel. Some systems were not designed for maintenance in space; however this type of problem had been overcome before such as when the primary coolant loop was repaired.
A four phase plan to use the Skylab with the Space Shuttle was as follows:
* A small
Skylab Reboost Modulewould be docked to Skylab on the second Shuttle flight ( STS-2A) and boost it to a higher storage orbit.
* In two shuttle flights, Skylab would be refurbished. In January 1982, the first mission would attach a docking adapter and conduct repairs. In August 1983, a second crew would replace several system components.
* Beginning in March 1984, shuttle crews would attach a solar-powered
Power Expansion Module, refurbish scientific equipment, and conduct 30 to 90 day missions using the Apollo Telescope Mount and the earth resources experiments.
* From 1985 to 1989 Skylab would be expanded for up to eight astronauts, with a new large docking/interface module, additional logistics modules,
Spacelabmodules and pallets, and an orbital vehicle space dock using the shuttle's external tank.
solar activity, heating the outer layers of the Earth's atmosphere and thereby increasing drag on Skylab, led to an early reentry at approximately 16:37 UTC 11 July 1979. In the weeks leading up to the reentry, ground controllers had re-established contact with the six year old vehicle, and were able to adjust its attitude for optimal reentry dynamics. Earth reentry footprint was a narrow band (approx. 4° wide) beginning at about coord|48|S|87|E| and ending at about coord|12|S|144|E|, an area covering portions of the Indian Oceanand Western Australia. Debris was found between Esperance and Rawlinna, 31–34°S, 122–126°E. The Shire of Esperancefined the United States $400 for littering, a fine which, to this day, remains unpaid. [Taggart, Stewart. " [http://www.space.com/news/spacestation/esperance_mir_010320.html Australians Take Mir Deorbit Risks in Stride.] " Space.com, 20 March2001. In 2004, the History Channeldocumentary " History Rocks" stated, in an episode covering major events of 1979, that this fine has never been paid.]
Skylab's demise was an international media event, with merchandising, wagering on time and place of re-entry and nightly news reports. The "
San Francisco Examiner" offered a $10,000 prize for the first piece of Skylab to be delivered to their offices. 17-year-old Stan Thornton scooped a few pieces of Skylab off the roof of his home in Esperance, Western Australia and caught the first flight to San Francisco, where he collected his prize. In a coincidence for the organizers, the annual Miss Universepageant was scheduled to be held a few days later, on 20 July 1979in nearby Perth, Western Australia. A large piece of Skylab debris was displayed on the stage. [ [http://criticalbeauty.com/MU_Telecast_1979.html Critical Beauty - Miss Universe 1979 ] ]
A flight-quality backup Skylab was built. It is on display at the
National Air and Space Museumin Washington, DC. A full scale training mockup once used for astronaut training is located at the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Centervisitor's center in Houston, Texas. Another full scale training mockup is now kept at Huntsville, Alabama, made from spare parts. It is currently being restored. [ [http://saveskylab.org/ index ] ]
The number identification of the manned Skylab missions is the cause of much confusion . Originally, the unmanned launch of Skylab and 3 manned missions were numbered SL-1 through SL-4. During the preparations for the manned missions, some documentation was created with a different scheme--SLM-1 through SLM-3--for those missions only.
William Poguecredits Pete Conradwith asking the Skylab program director which scheme should be used for the mission patches and the astronauts were told to use 1-2-3, not 2-3-4. By the time NASA administrators tried to reverse this decision, it was too late, as all the in-flight clothing had already been manufactured and shipped with the 1-2-3 mission patches. [cite web | url = http://williampogue.com/skylab-numbering-mixup.html | title = Skylab Numbering Fiasco | publisher = williampogue.com]
International Space Station
* [http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4011/cover.htm "SKYLAB: A CHRONOLOGY" by Roland W. Newkirk and Ivan D. Ertel with Courtney G. Brooks (NASA SP-4011 1977)]
* [http://history.nasa.gov/SP-402/contents.htm SP-402 A New Sun: The Solar Results from Skylab]
* [http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19740024203_1974024203.pdf Skylab Mission Evaluation - NASA report (PDF format)]
* [http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19800012907_1980012907.pdf Skylab Reactivation Mission Report 1980 - NASA report (PDF format)]
* [http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19770020211_1977020211.pdf Skylab Our First Space Station - NASA report (PDF format)]
* [http://saveskylab.org/ Skylab Restoration Project]
* [http://history.nasa.gov/series95.html NASA History Series Publications] (many of which are on-line)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.