- Net metering
-
Part of a series on Green economics PoliciesDynamicsRenewable energy commercialization
Marginal Abatement Cost
Green paradox
Green politics
Pollution haven theoryv · electricity policy for consumers who own (generally small) renewable energy facilities (such as wind, solar power or home fuel cells) or V2G electric vehicles. "Net", in this context, is used in the sense of meaning "what remains after deductions" — in this case, the deduction of any energy outflows from metered energy inflows. Under net metering, a system owner receives retail credit for at least a portion of the electricity they generate. Most electricity meters accurately record in both directions, allowing a no-cost method of effectively banking excess electricity production for future credit. However, the rules vary significantly by country and possibly state/province: if net metering is available, if and how long you can keep your banked credits, and how much the credits are worth (retail/wholesale). Most net metering laws involve monthly roll over of kWh credits, a small monthly connection fee, require monthly payment of deficits (i.e. normal electric bill), and annual settlement of any residual credit. Unlike a Feed-in Tariff or time of use metering (TOU), net metering can be implemented solely as an accounting procedure, and requires no special metering, or even any prior arrangement or notification.[1]
Net Metering is generally a consumer-based renewable energy incentive. While it is important to have Net Metering available for any consumer that interconnects their renewable generator to the grid, this form of renewable incentive places the burdens of pioneering renewable energy primarily upon fragmented consumers. Often over-burdened energy agencies are not providing incentives on a consistent basis and it is difficult for individuals to negotiate with large institutions to recover their Net Metering credits and/or rebates for using renewable energy.
In the U.S.A., as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, under Sec. 1251, all public electric utilities are now required to make available upon request net metering to their customers.[2]:
‘‘(11) NET METERING.—Each electric utility shall make available upon request net metering service to any electric consumer that the electric utility serves. For purposes of this paragraph, the term ‘net metering service’ means service to an electric consumer under which electric energy generated by that electric consumer from an eligible on-site generating
facility and delivered to the local distribution facilities may be used to offset electric energy provided by the electric utility to the electric consumer during the applicable billing period.In Canada, some Canadian provinces have net metering programs.
The United Kingdom government is reluctant to introduce the net metering principle because of complications in paying and refunding the value added tax that is payable on electricity, but pilot projects are underway in some areas.
Contents
Time of use metering
Further information: Smart meterTime of use (TOU) net metering employs a specialized reversible smart (electric) meter that is programmed to determine electricity usage any time during the day. Time-of-use allows utility rates and charges to be assessed based on when the electricity was used (i.e., day/night and seasonal rates). Typically the production cost of electricity is highest during the daytime peak usage period, and low during the night, when usage is low. Time of use metering is a significant issue for renewable-energy sources, since, for example, solar power systems tend to produce energy during the daytime peak-price period, and produce little or no power during the night period, when price is low.
Market rate net metering
Further information: Vehicle-to-gridIn market rate net metering systems the user's energy use is priced dynamically according to some function of wholesale electric prices. The users' meters are programmed remotely to calculate the value and are read remotely. Net metering applies such variable pricing to excess power produced by a qualifying systems.
Market rate metering systems will be implemented in California starting in 2006 and under the terms of California's net metering rules will be applicable to qualifying photovoltaic and wind systems. Under California law the payback for surplus electricity sent to the grid must be equal to the (variable, in this case) price charged at that time. It can never be negative, meaning you cannot make money from selling the electricity back. If you generate more electricity than you use then over a period of a month you will be billed zero and not make any money, in effect you give away your extra energy if you do not use it.
Net metering enables small systems to result in zero annual net cost to the consumer provided that the consumer is able to shift demand loads to a lower price time, such as by chilling water at a low cost time for later use in air conditioning, or by charging a battery electric vehicle during off-peak times, while the electricity generated at peak demand time can be sent to the grid rather than used locally (see Vehicle-to-grid). No credit is given for annual surplus production.
Australia
Main article: Feed-in tariffs in AustraliaIn some Australian states, the "feed-in tariff" is actually net metering, except that it pays monthly for net generation at a higher rate than retail, with Environment Victoria Campaigns Director Mark Wakeham calling it a "fake feed-in tariff".[3] A feed-in tariff requires a separate meter, and pays for all local generation at a preferential rate, while net metering requires only one meter. The financial differences are very substantial.
Victoria
From 2009, householders will be paid 60 cents for every excess kilowatt hour of energy fed back into the state electricity grid. This is around three times the current retail price for electricity.
Queensland
Commencing in 2008, the Solar Bonus Scheme pays 44 cents for every excess kilowatt hour of energy fed back into the state electricity grid. This is around three times the current retail price for electricity.
Canada
Ontario
Ontario allows net metering for up to 500 kW, however credits can only be carried for 12 consecutive months. Should a consumer establish a credit where they generate more than they consume for 8 months and use up the credits in the 10th month then the 12 month period begins again from the date that the next credit is shown on an invoice. Any unused credits remaining at the end of 12 consecutive months of a consumer being in a credit situation are cleared at the end of that billing.[4]
British Columbia
Areas of British Columbia serviced by BC Hydro are allowed net metering for up to 50 kW. At each annual anniversary the customer is paid 8.16 Cents [5] per KWh if there is a net export of power. Systems over 50 kW are covered under the Standing Offer Program.[6] FortisBC which serves an area in South Central BC also allows net-metering for up to 50 kW. Customers are paid their existing retail rate for any net energy they produce.[7] The City of New Westminster which has its own electrical utility does not currently allow net-metering. [3]
New Brunswick
New Brunswick allows net metering for installations up to 100 kW. Credits from excess generated power can be carried over until March at which time any excess credits are lost. [8]
European Union
Denmark
Net-metering for privately owned PV systems was established mid 1998 for a pilot-period of four years. Late 2002 the net-metering scheme was extended another four years up to end of 2006. Net-metering has proved to be a cheap, easy to administer and effective way of stimulating the deployment of PV in Denmark; however the relative short time window of the arrangement has so far prevented it from reaching its full potential. During the political negotiations in the fall of 2005 the net-metering for privately owned PV systems was made permanent.[9]
Italy
Italy offers a very attractive support scheme, mixing net-metering and a well segmented premium FiT.[10]
Spain
Net metering has been proposed by ASIF to promote renewable electricity, without requiring additional economic support.[11]
United States
Main article: Net metering in the United StatesSeveral bills are pending in Congress to institute a federal requirement that utilities provide net metering. They range from H.R. 729 which allows up to 2% net metering to H.R. 1945 which has no limit, but does limit residential users to 10 kW, a low limit compared to many states, such as New Mexico, with an 80,000 kW limit, or states such as Arizona, Colorado, and Ohio which limit as a percentage of load. Current as of June 2011[12] , only three states do not allow net metering, plus Washington D.C., twenty one have no limit on the number of subscribers using net metering. Only two, Arizona and Ohio, have no specific wattage limit on the power limit for each subscriber (see table). Colorado, Maryland, New Jersey and Pennsylvania are considered the most favorable states for net metering, as they are the only states to receive an "A" rating from the Network for New Energy Choices in 2007, 2008 and 2009.[13]
State Subscriber limit
(% of peak)Power limit
Res/Com(kW)Monthly
rolloverAnnual
compensationAlabama no limit 100 yes, can be indefinitely varies Alaska 1.5 25 yes, indefinitely retail rate Arizona no limit 125% of load yes, avoided-cost at end of billing year retail rate Arkansas no limit 25/300 yes, until end of billing year retail rate California 5 1,000 yes, can be indefinitely varies Colorado no limit 120% of load or 10/25* yes, indefinitely varies* Connecticut no limit 2,000 yes, avoided-cost at end of billing year retail rate Delaware 5 25/500 or 2,000* yes, indefinitely retail rate District of Columbia no limit 1,000 yes, indefinitely retail rate Florida no limit 2,000 yes, avoided-cost at end of billing year retail rate Georgia 0.2 10/100 no determined rate Hawaii 1 or 3* 50 or 100* yes, until end of billing year retail rate Idaho 0.1 25 or 25/100* no retail rate or avoided-cost* Illinois 1 40 yes, until end of billing year retail rate Indiana 0.1 10 yes, indefinitely retail rate Iowa no limit 500 yes, indefinitely retail rate Kansas 1 25/200 yes, until end of billing year retail rate Kentucky 1 30 yes, indefinitely retail rate Louisiana no limit 25/300 yes, indefinitely avoided cost Maine no limit 100 or 660* yes, until end of billing year retail rate Maryland 1500 MW 2,000 yes, until end of billing year retail rate Massachusetts** 1 60, 1,000 or 2,000 varies varies Michigan 0.75 150 yes, indefinitely partial retail rate Minnesota no limit 40 no retail rate Mississippi N/A N/A N/A N/A Missouri 5 100 yes, until end of billing year avoided-cost Montana no limit 50 yes, until end of billing year retail rate Nebraska 1 25 yes, until end of billing year avoided-cost Nevada 1 1,000 yes, indefinitely retail rate New Hampshire 1 100 yes, indefinitely retail rate New Jersey no limit 2,000 yes, avoided-cost at end of billing year retail rate New Mexico no limit 80,000 if under $50 avoided-cost New York 1 or 0.3 (wind) 10 to 2,000 or peak load varies avoided-cost or retail rate North Carolina no limit 1000 yes, until summer billing season retail rate North Dakota no limit 100 no avoided-cost Ohio no limit no explicit limit yes, until end of billing year generation rate Oklahoma no limit 100 or 25,000/year no avoided-cost, but utility not required to purchase Oregon 0.5 or no limit* 10/25 or 25/2,000* yes, until end of billing year varies Pennsylvania no limit 50/3,000 or 5,000 yes, "price-to-compare" at end of billing year retail rate Rhode Island 2 1,650 for most, 2250 or 3500* optional slightly less than retail rate South Carolina 0.2 20/100 yes, until summer billing season time-of-rate use or less South Dakota N/A N/A N/A N/A Tennessee N/A N/A N/A N/A Texas*** no limit 20 or 25 no varies Utah varies* 25/2,000 or 10* varies* avoided-cost or retail rate* Vermont 2 250 yes, until end of billing year retail rate Virginia 1 10/500 yes, avoided-cost option at end of billing year retail rate Washington 0.25 100 yes, until end of billing year retail rate West Virginia 0.1 25 yes, up to twelve months retail rate Wisconsin no limit 20 no retail rate for renewables, avoided-cost for non-renewables Wyoming no limit 25 yes, avoided-cost at end of billing year retail rate Note: Some additional minor variations not listed in this table may apply. N/A = Not available. Lost = Excess electricity credit or credit not claimed is granted to utility. Retail rate = Final sale price of electricity. Avoided-cost = "Wholesale" price of electricity (cost to the utility). * = Depending on utility. ** = Massachusetts distinguishes policies for different "classes" of systems. *** = Only available to customers of Austin Energy or Green Mountain Energy (Green Mountain Energy is not a utility but a retail electric provider; according to www.powertochoose.com, Green Mountain prices are twice the average retail price).[14]
Net purchase and sale
Net purchase and sale is a different method of providing power to the electricity grid that does not offer the price symmetry of net metering, making this system a lot less profitable for home users of small renewable electricity systems.
Under this arrangement, two uni-directional meters are installed—one records electricity drawn from the grid, and the other records excess electricity generated and fed back into the grid. The user pays retail rate for the electricity they use, and the power provider purchases their excess generation at its avoided cost (wholesale rate). There may be a significant difference between the retail rate the user pays and the power provider's avoided cost.[15]
Germany, Spain, some States in the USA and other countries, on the other hand, have adopted a price schedule, or Feed-in Tariff (FIT), whereby customers get paid for any electricity they generate from renewable energy on their premises. The actual electricity being generated is counted on a separate meter, not just the surplus they feed back to the grid. In Germany, for the solar power generated, a feed-in tariff is being paid in order to boost solar power (figure from 2009). Germany once paid several times the retail rate for solar but has successfully reduced the rates drastically while actual installation of solar has grown exponentially at the same time due to installed cost reductions. Wind energy, in contrast, only receives around a half of the domestic retail rate, because the German system pays what each source costs (including a reasonable profit margin).
Related technology
Sources that produce direct current, such as solar panels must be coupled with an electrical inverter to convert the output to alternating current, for use with conventional appliances. The phase of the outgoing power must be synchronized with the grid, and a mechanism must be included to disconnect the feed in the event of grid failure. This is for safety - for example, workers repairing downed power lines must be protected from "downstream" sources, in addition to being disconnected from the main "upstream" distribution grid.
Solar Guerrilla
Solar Guerrilla (or the guerrilla solar movement) is a term originated by Home Power Magazine and is applied to someone who uses an alternative energy source to illegally supply electricity back to a public utility grid.[16] If equipment is used which circumvents safety systems it is extremely dangerous to workers repairing power lines.
See also
- Automatic meter reading
- Demand response
- Distributed generation
- Electricity meter
- Feed-in Tariff
- Interstate Renewable Energy Council
- Power Purchase Agreement
- Power system automation
- Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978
- Smart Grid
- Smart meter
- Utility submeter
- Variable pricing
- Virtual power plant
References
- ^ Net Metering is a Win-Win for Utilities and Local Communities
- ^ Net Metering
- ^ Solar feed-in tariff meets with mixed reviews
- ^ Net Metering in Ontario
- ^ [1],
- ^ BC Hydro Net Metering
- ^ FortisBC: Net Metering
- ^ [2]
- ^ http://www.iea-pvps.org/ar/ar07/07ar_Denmark.pdf
- ^ http://www.asif.org/files/EPIA_Perspectiva_del_Mecado_FV_Global_hasta_2013.pdf
- ^ http://www.epia.org/policy/national-policies/spain/interview-with-the-national-pv-associations/interview-with-javier-anta-president-of-asif.html
- ^ Net metering in Alabama
- ^ Freeing the Grid: Best and Worst Practices in State Net Metering Policies and Interconnection Procedures
- ^ Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency
- ^ U.S. Department of Energy EERE Consumer's Guide: Metering and Rate Arrangements for Grid-Connected Systems, updated September 12, 2005, accessed 23 January 2006
- ^ "Guerrilla Solar". http://www.motherearthnews.com/Alternative-Energy/2001-02-01/Guerrilla-Solar.aspx. Retrieved 2007-07-16.
External links
- U.S. Department of Energy - Net Metering Policies
- EERE:
- The Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy (DSIRE)
- Connecting to the Grid: published monthly, focusing on the latest news on interconnection and net metering in the U.S.
- Canada 2003
- Renewable Energy in Grid-Connected Electricity Generation (by REN21)
News Articles
- Utilities in N.Y. told to make switch to time-of-day pricing, Ithaca Journal, 18 Dec 2007
- Time-of-Day Pricing, PBS Jim Lehrer, 22 Jun 2001
- Time of Day Pricing for Electricity, Tom Evslin's Blog, 19 Feb 2007
- Net Metering, Technorati (tagged social media)
v · d · eElectricity generation Concepts Availability factor · Baseload · Black start · Capacity factor · Demand factor · Demand management · EROEI · Grid storage · Intermittency · Load following · Nameplate capacity · Peak demand · Repowering · Spark spreadSources Technology Distribution Policies Carbon offset · Coal phase out · Ecotax · Energy subsidies · Feed-in tariff · Net metering · Pigovian tax · Renewable Energy Certificates · Renewable energy payments · Renewable energy policyCategories: Electric power distribution · Electricity economics · Power station technology · Portals: Energy · Sustainable developmentCategories:- Energy storage
- Pricing
- Smart grid
- Renewable-energy economy
- Net metering
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
net metering — (NET mee.tur.ing) pp. Tracking a building s electricity use as the net difference between the power consumed via the public utility grid less the power generated using solar or wind energy. net meter v. Example Citation: Dennis Myers is a poster… … New words
Net metering in the United States — Main article: Net metering Net metering is an electricity policy for consumers who own (generally small) renewable energy facilities (such as wind, solar power or home fuel cells) or V2G electric vehicles. Net , in this context, is used in the… … Wikipedia
Net Metering — The practice of using a single meter to measure consumption and generation of electricity by a small generation facility (such as a house with a wind or solar photovoltaic system). The net energy produced or consumed is purchased from or sold… … Energy terms
net metering — noun The practice by utilities of auditing wattage created by renewable resources and using any excess green power created towards ones bill … Wiktionary
net metering — … Useful english dictionary
NET — or Net may refer to: Net (device), fibers woven in a grid like structure Net (textile), any textile in which the warp and weft yarns are looped or knotted at their intersections New Jersey Nets, a basketball team The Net (1995 film), a film… … Wikipedia
Metering mode — In photography, the metering mode refers to the way in which a camera determines the exposure. Digital metering feedback … Wikipedia
Smart metering — Intelligenter Stromzähler Ein intelligenter Zähler (auch Smart Meter genannt) ist ein mit Zusatzfunktionen ausgestatteter, elektronischer Zähler, welcher üblicherweise Energie in Form eines Zählerstandes erfasst. Es gibt Zähler für die Messung… … Deutsch Wikipedia
Feed-in tariff — Part of a series on Green economics Concepts … Wikipedia
Smart grid — Public infrastructure … Wikipedia
18+© Academic, 2000-2024- Contact us: Technical Support, Advertising
Dictionaries export, created on PHP, Joomla, Drupal, WordPress, MODx.Share the article and excerpts
Net metering
- Net metering
-
Part of a series on Green economics PoliciesDynamicsRenewable energy commercialization
Marginal Abatement Cost
Green paradox
Green politics
Pollution haven theory