Graphics processing unit

"GPU" redirects here. For other uses, see GPU (disambiguation).

GeForce 6600GT (NV43) GPU

A graphics processing unit or GPU (also occasionally called visual processing unit or VPU) is a specialized circuit designed to rapidly manipulate and alter memory in such a way so as to accelerate the building of images in a frame buffer intended for output to a display. GPUs are used in embedded systems, mobile phones, personal computers, workstations, and game consoles. Modern GPUs are very efficient at manipulating computer graphics, and their highly parallel structure makes them more effective than general-purpose CPUs for algorithms where processing of large blocks of data is done in parallel. In a personal computer, a GPU can be present on a video card, or it can be on the motherboard, or in certain CPUs, on the CPU die. More than 90% of new desktop and notebook computers have integrated GPUs, which are usually far less powerful than those on a dedicated video card.^[1]

The term was defined and popularized by Nvidia in 1999, who marketed the GeForce 256 as "the world's first 'GPU', or Graphics Processing Unit, a single-chip processor with integrated transform, lighting, triangle setup/clipping, and rendering engines that is capable of processing a minimum of 10 million polygons per second". Rival ATI Technologies coined the term visual processing unit or VPU with the release of the Radeon 9700 in 2002.

History

1980s

In 1983 Intel made available the iSBX 275 Video Graphics Controller Multimodule Board for industrial systems based on the Multibus standard. ^[2] The card was based on the 82720 Graphics Display Controller and accelerated the drawing of lines, arcs, rectangles, and character bitmaps. Also accelerated was framebuffer loading via DMA. The board was intended for use with Intel's line of Multibus single board computer plugin cards.

Released in 1985, the Commodore Amiga was the first personal computer to use a GPU. The GPU supported line draw, area fill, and included a type of circuit called a blitter which accelerated the movement, manipulation, and combination of multiple arbitrary bitmaps. Also included was a graphics coprocessor with its own (primitive) instruction set. Prior to this and quite some time after, many other personal computer systems required a general purpose CPU to handle every aspect of drawing the display.

In 1986, Texas Instruments released the TMS34010, the first microprocessor with on-chip graphics capabilities. It could run general-purpose code, but it had a very graphics-oriented instruction set. In 1990-1991, this chip became the basis of the Texas Instruments Graphics Architecture ("TIGA") Windows accelerator cards.

In 1987, IBM's 8514 graphics system was released as one of the first video cards for PC compatibles to implement 2D primitives in hardware.

1990s

Tseng Labs ET4000/W32p

S3 Graphics ViRGE

Voodoo3 2000 AGP card

In 1991, S3 Graphics introduced the S3 86C911, which its designers named after the Porsche 911 as an indication of the performance increase it promised. The 86C911 spawned a host of imitators: by 1995, all major PC graphics chip makers had added 2D acceleration support to their chips. By this time, fixed-function Windows accelerators had surpassed expensive general-purpose graphics coprocessors in Windows performance, and these coprocessors faded away from the PC market.

Throughout the 1990s, 2D GUI acceleration continued to evolve. As manufacturing capabilities improved, so did the level of integration of graphics chips. Additional application programming interfaces (APIs) arrived for a variety of tasks, such as Microsoft's WinG graphics library for Windows 3.x, and their later DirectDraw interface for hardware acceleration of 2D games within Windows 95 and later.

In the early and mid-1990s, CPU-assisted real-time 3D graphics were becoming increasingly common in computer and console games, which led to an increasing public demand for hardware-accelerated 3D graphics. Early examples of mass-marketed 3D graphics hardware can be found in fifth generation video game consoles such as PlayStation and Nintendo 64. In the PC world, notable failed first-tries for low-cost 3D graphics chips were the S3 ViRGE, ATI Rage, and Matrox Mystique. These chips were essentially previous-generation 2D accelerators with 3D features bolted on. Many were even pin-compatible with the earlier-generation chips for ease of implementation and minimal cost. Initially, performance 3D graphics were possible only with discrete boards dedicated to accelerating 3D functions (and lacking 2D GUI acceleration entirely) such as the 3dfx Voodoo. However, as manufacturing technology again progressed, video, 2D GUI acceleration, and 3D functionality were all integrated into one chip. Rendition's Verite chipsets were the first to do this well enough to be worthy of note.

OpenGL appeared in the early 90s as a professional graphics API, but originally suffered from performance issues which allowed the Glide API to step in and become a dominant force on the PC in the late 90s.^[3] However these issues were quickly overcome and the Glide API fell by the wayside. Software implementations of OpenGL were common during this time although the influence of OpenGL eventually led to widespread hardware support. Over time a parity emerged between features offered in hardware and those offered in OpenGL. DirectX became popular among Windows game developers during the late 90s. Unlike OpenGL, Microsoft insisted on providing strict one-to-one support of hardware. The approach made DirectX less popular as a stand alone graphics API initially since many GPUs provided their own specific features, which existing OpenGL applications were already able to benefit from, leaving DirectX often one generation behind. (See: Comparison of OpenGL and Direct3D).

Over time Microsoft began to work more closely with hardware developers, and started to target the releases of DirectX with those of the supporting graphics hardware. Direct3D 5.0 was the first version of the burgeoning API to gain widespread adoption in the gaming market, and it competed directly with many more hardware specific, often proprietary graphics libraries, while OpenGL maintained a strong following. Direct3D 7.0 introduced support for hardware-accelerated transform and lighting (T&L) for Direct3D, while OpenGL already had this capability already exposed from its inception. 3D accelerators moved beyond being just simple rasterizers to add another significant hardware stage to the 3D rendering pipeline. The NVIDIA GeForce 256 (also known as NV10) was the first consumer-level card on the market with hardware-accelerated T&L, while professional 3D cards already had this capability. Hardware transform and lighting, both already existing features of OpenGL, came to consumer-level hardware in the 90s and set the precedent for later pixel shader and vertex shader units which were far more flexible and programmable.

2000 to present

With the advent of the OpenGL API and similar functionality in DirectX, GPUs added programmable shading to their capabilities. Each pixel could now be processed by a short program that could include additional image textures as inputs, and each geometric vertex could likewise be processed by a short program before it was projected onto the screen. NVIDIA was first to produce a chip capable of programmable shading, the GeForce 3 (code named NV20). By October 2002, with the introduction of the ATI Radeon 9700 (also known as R300), the world's first Direct3D 9.0 accelerator, pixel and vertex shaders could implement looping and lengthy floating point math, and in general were quickly becoming as flexible as CPUs, and orders of magnitude faster for image-array operations. Pixel shading is often used for things like bump mapping, which adds texture, to make an object look shiny, dull, rough, or even round or extruded.^[4]

As the processing power of GPUs has increased, so has their demand for electrical power. High performance GPUs often consume more energy than current CPUs.^[5] See also performance per watt and quiet PC.

Today, parallel GPUs have begun making computational inroads against the CPU, and a subfield of research, dubbed GPU Computing or GPGPU for General Purpose Computing on GPU, has found its way into fields as diverse as oil exploration, scientific image processing, linear algebra,^[6] statistics,^[7] 3D reconstruction and even stock options pricing determination. Nvidia's CUDA platform was the earliest widely adopted programming model for GPU computing. More recently OpenCL has become broadly supported. OpenCL is an open standard defined by the Khronos Group^[8]. OpenCL solutions are supported by Intel, AMD, Nvidia, and ARM, and according to a recent report by Evan's data Open CL is the GPGPU development platform most widely used by developers in both the US and Asia Pacific.

GPU companies

Many companies have produced GPUs under a number of brand names. In 2008, Intel, NVIDIA and AMD/ATI were the market share leaders, with 49.4%, 27.8% and 20.6% market share respectively. However, those numbers include Intel's integrated graphics solutions as GPUs. Not counting those numbers, NVIDIA and ATI control nearly 100% of the market.^[9] In addition, S3 Graphics,^[10] VIA Technologies ^[11] and Matrox ^[12] produce GPUs.

Computational functions

Modern GPUs use most of their transistors to do calculations related to 3D computer graphics. They were initially used to accelerate the memory-intensive work of texture mapping and rendering polygons, later adding units to accelerate geometric calculations such as the rotation and translation of vertices into different coordinate systems. Recent developments in GPUs include support for programmable shaders which can manipulate vertices and textures with many of the same operations supported by CPUs, oversampling and interpolation techniques to reduce aliasing, and very high-precision color spaces. Because most of these computations involve matrix and vector operations, engineers and scientists have increasingly studied the use of GPUs for non-graphical calculations.

In addition to the 3D hardware, today's GPUs include basic 2D acceleration and framebuffer capabilities (usually with a VGA compatibility mode).

GPU accelerated video decoding

[The Ati HD5470 GPU (right) features UVD 2.1 which enables it to decode AVC and VC-1 video formats- GPU from Vaio E series laptop

Most GPUs made since 1995 support the YUV color space and hardware overlays, important for digital video playback, and many GPUs made since 2000 also support MPEG primitives such as motion compensation and iDCT. This process of hardware accelerated video decoding, where portions of the video decoding process and video post-processing are offloaded to the GPU hardware, is commonly referred to as "GPU accelerated video decoding", "GPU assisted video decoding", "GPU hardware accelerated video decoding" or "GPU hardware assisted video decoding".

More recent graphics cards even decode high-definition video on the card, offloading the central processing unit. The most common APIs for GPU accelerated video decoding are DxVA for Microsoft Windows operating system, VDPAU, VAAPI, XvMC, and XvBA for Linux and UNIX based operating-system. All except XvMC are capable of decoding videos encoded with MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 ASP (MPEG-4 Part 2), MPEG-4 AVC (H.264 / DivX 6), VC-1, WMV3/WMV9, Xvid / OpenDivX (DivX 4), and DivX 5 codecs, while XvMC is only capable of decoding MPEG-1 and MPEG-2.

Video decoding processes that can be accelerated

The video decoding processes that can be accelerated by today's modern GPU hardware are:

• Motion compensation (mocomp)
• Inverse discrete cosine transform (iDCT)
  • Inverse telecine 3:2 and 2:2 pull-down correction
• Inverse modified discrete cosine transform (iMDCT)
• In-loop deblocking filter
• Intra-frame prediction
• Inverse quantization (IQ)
• Variable-Length Decoding (VLD), more commonly known as slice-level acceleration
• Spatial-temporal deinterlacing and automatic interlace/progressive source detection
• Bitstream processing (CAVLC/CABAC).

GPU forms

Dedicated graphics cards

Main article: Video card

The GPUs of the most powerful class typically interface with the motherboard by means of an expansion slot such as PCI Express (PCIe) or Accelerated Graphics Port (AGP) and can usually be replaced or upgraded with relative ease, assuming the motherboard is capable of supporting the upgrade. A few graphics cards still use Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) slots, but their bandwidth is so limited that they are generally used only when a PCIe or AGP slot is not available.

A dedicated GPU is not necessarily removable, nor does it necessarily interface with the motherboard in a standard fashion. The term "dedicated" refers to the fact that dedicated graphics cards have RAM that is dedicated to the card's use, not to the fact that most dedicated GPUs are removable. Dedicated GPUs for portable computers are most commonly interfaced through a non-standard and often proprietary slot due to size and weight constraints. Such ports may still be considered PCIe or AGP in terms of their logical host interface, even if they are not physically interchangeable with their counterparts.

Technologies such as SLI by NVIDIA and CrossFire by ATI allow multiple GPUs to be used to draw a single image, increasing the processing power available for graphics.

Integrated graphics solutions

Integrated graphics solutions, shared graphics solutions, or Integrated graphics processors (IGP) utilize a portion of a computer's system RAM rather than dedicated graphics memory. They are integrated into the motherboard. Exceptions are AMD's IGPs that use dedicated sideport memory on certain motherboards, and APUs, where they are integrated with the CPU die. Computers with integrated graphics account for 90% of all PC shipments.^[13] These solutions are less costly to implement than dedicated graphics solutions, but tend to be less capable. Historically, integrated solutions were often considered unfit to play 3D games or run graphically intensive programs but could run less intensive programs such as Adobe Flash. Examples of such IGPs would be offerings from SiS and VIA circa 2004.^[14] However, today's integrated solutions such as AMD's Radeon HD 3200 (AMD 780G chipset) and NVIDIA's GeForce 8200 (nForce 710|NVIDIA nForce 730a) are more than capable of handling 2D graphics from Adobe Flash or low stress 3D graphics.^[15] However, integrated graphics still struggle with high-end video games. Chips like the Nvidia GeForce 9400M in Apple's MacBook and MacBook Pro and AMD's Radeon HD 3300 (AMD 790GX) have improved performance, but still lag behind dedicated graphics cards. Modern desktop motherboards often include an integrated graphics solution and have expansion slots available to add a dedicated graphics card later.

As a GPU is extremely memory intensive, an integrated solution may find itself competing for the already relatively slow system RAM with the CPU, as it has minimal or no dedicated video memory. System RAM may be 2 GB/s to 16 GB/s, yet dedicated GPUs enjoy between 10 GB/s to over 300 GB/s of bandwidth depending on the model (for instance the GeForce GTX 590 and Radeon HD 6990 provide approximately 320 GB/s between dual memory controllers).

Older integrated graphics chipsets lacked hardware transform and lighting, but newer ones include it.^[16]

Hybrid solutions

This newer class of GPUs competes with integrated graphics in the low-end desktop and notebook markets. The most common implementations of this are ATI's HyperMemory and NVIDIA's TurboCache. Hybrid graphics cards are somewhat more expensive than integrated graphics, but much less expensive than dedicated graphics cards. These share memory with the system and have a small dedicated memory cache, to make up for the high latency of the system RAM. Technologies within PCI Express can make this possible. While these solutions are sometimes advertised as having as much as 768MB of RAM, this refers to how much can be shared with the system memory.

Stream Processing and General Purpose GPUs (GPGPU)

Main articles: GPGPU and Stream processing

A new concept is to use a general purpose graphics processing unit as a modified form of stream processor. This concept turns the massive floating-point computational power of a modern graphics accelerator's shader pipeline into general-purpose computing power, as opposed to being hard wired solely to do graphical operations. In certain applications requiring massive vector operations, this can yield several orders of magnitude higher performance than a conventional CPU. The two largest discrete (see "Dedicated graphics cards" above) GPU designers, ATI and NVIDIA, are beginning to pursue this new approach with an array of applications. Both nVidia and ATI have teamed with Stanford University to create a GPU-based client for the Folding@Home distributed computing project, for protein folding calculations. In certain circumstances the GPU calculates forty times faster than the conventional CPUs traditionally used by such applications.^[17][18]

Furthermore, GPU-based high performance computers are starting to play a significant role in large-scale modelling. Three of the 5 most powerful supercomputers in the world take advantage of GPU acceleration. This includes the current leader as of October 2010, Tianhe-1A, which uses the NVIDIA Tesla platform.^[19]

Recently NVidia began releasing cards supporting an API extension to the C programming language CUDA ("Compute Unified Device Architecture"), which allows specified functions from a normal C program to run on the GPU's stream processors. This makes C programs capable of taking advantage of a GPU's ability to operate on large matrices in parallel, while still making use of the CPU when appropriate. CUDA is also the first API to allow CPU-based applications to access directly the resources of a GPU for more general purpose computing without the limitations of using a graphics API.

Since 2005 there has been interest in using the performance offered by GPUs for evolutionary computation in general, and for accelerating the fitness evaluation in genetic programming in particular. Most approaches compile linear or tree programs on the host PC and transfer the executable to the GPU to be run. Typically the performance advantage is only obtained by running the single active program simultaneously on many example problems in parallel, using the GPU's SIMD architecture.^[20][21] However, substantial acceleration can also be obtained by not compiling the programs, and instead transferring them to the GPU, to be interpreted there.^[22][23] Acceleration can then be obtained by either interpreting multiple programs simultaneously, simultaneously running multiple example problems, or combinations of both. A modern GPU (e.g. 8800 GTX or later) can readily simultaneously interpret hundreds of thousands of very small programs.

See also

Reference

• Brute force attack
• Computer graphics
• Computer hardware
• Computer monitor
• Central processing unit
• Physics processing unit (PPU)
• Ray tracing hardware
• Video card
• Video Display Controller
• Video game console

Hardware

• Comparison of AMD graphics processing units
• Comparison of Nvidia graphics processing units
• Intel GMA
• Larrabee
• Nvidia PureVideo - the bit-stream technology from NVIDIA used in their graphics chips to accelerate video decoding on hardware GPU with DXVA.
• UVD (Unified Video Decoder) - is the video decoding bit-stream technology from ATI Technologies to support hardware (GPU) decode with DXVA.

APIs

• DirectX Video Acceleration (DxVA) API for Microsoft Windows operating-system.
• OpenVideo Decode (OVD) – an new open cross-platform video acceleration API from AMD.^[24]
• Video Acceleration API (VA API)
• Video Decode Acceleration Framework is Apple Inc.s API for hardware-accelerated decoding of H.264 on Mac OS X
• VDPAU (Video Decode and Presentation API for Unix)
• VideoToolBox is an undocumented API from Apple Inc. for hardware-accelerated decoding on Apple TV and Mac OS X 10.5 or later.^[25]
• X-Video Bitstream Acceleration (XvBA), the X11 equivalent of DXVA for MPEG-2, H.264, and VC-1
• X-Video Motion Compensation, the X11 equivalent for MPEG-2 video codec only

Applications

• GPU cluster
• Mathematica includes built-in support for CUDA and OpenCL GPU execution
• MATLAB acceleration using the Parallel Computing Toolbox and MATLAB Distributed Computing Server,^[26] as well as 3rd party packages like Jacket.
• Molecular modeling on GPU
• Bitcoin Mining

References

1. ^ Denny Atkin. "Computer Shopper: The Right GPU for You". http://computershopper.com/feature/200704_the_right_gpu_for_you. Retrieved 2007-05-15. 
2. ^ Michael Swaine, "New Chip from Intel Gives High-Quality Displays", March 14, 1983, p.16
3. ^ 3dfx Glide API
4. ^ Søren Dreijer. "Bump Mapping Using CG (3rd Edition)". http://www.blacksmith-studios.dk/projects/downloads/bumpmapping_using_cg.php. Retrieved 2007-05-30. 
5. ^ http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/power-noise.html X-bit labs: Faster, Quieter, Lower: Power Consumption and Noise Level of Contemporary Graphics Cards
6. ^ "Linear algebra operators for GPU implementation of numerical algorithms", Kruger and Westermann, International Conf. on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 2005
7. ^ "ABC-SysBio—approximate Bayesian computation in Python with GPU support", Liepe et al., Bioinformatics, (2010), 26:1797-1799 [1]
8. ^ Khronos Group [2]
9. ^ Q3 Sales Report from Jon Peddie Research via TechReport.com
10. ^ http://www.s3graphics.com/en/products/index.aspx
11. ^ http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/graphics
12. ^ http://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/products/graphics_cards
13. ^ AnandTech: µATX Part 2: Intel G33 Performance Review
14. ^ Tim Tscheblockov. "Xbit Labs: Roundup of 7 Contemporary Integrated Graphics Chipsets for Socket 478 and Socket A Platforms". http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/chipsets/display/int-chipsets-roundup.html. Retrieved 2007-06-03. 
15. ^ Intel G965 with GMA X3000 Integrated Graphics - Media Encoding and Game Benchmarks - CPUs, Boards & Components by ExtremeTech
16. ^ Bradley Sanford. "Integrated Graphics Solutions for Graphics-Intensive Applications". http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/Integrated_Graphics_Solutions_white_paper_rev61.pdf. Retrieved 2007-09-02. 
17. ^ Darren Murph. "Stanford University tailors Folding@home to GPUs". http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/29/stanford-university-tailors-folding-home-to-gpus/. Retrieved 2007-10-04. 
18. ^ Mike Houston. "Folding@Home - GPGPU". http://graphics.stanford.edu/~mhouston/. Retrieved 2007-10-04. 
19. ^ http://pressroom.nvidia.com/easyir/customrel.do?easyirid=A0D622CE9F579F09&version=live&prid=678988&releasejsp=release_157
20. ^ John Nickolls. "Stanford Lecture: Scalable Parallel Programming with CUDA on Manycore GPUs". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlGnKPpOpbE. 
21. ^ S Harding and W Banzhaf. "Fast genetic programming on GPUs". http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~wbl/biblio/gp-html/eurogp07_harding.html. Retrieved 2008-05-01. 
22. ^ W Langdon and W Banzhaf. "A SIMD interpreter for Genetic Programming on GPU Graphics Cards". http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~wbl/biblio/gp-html/langdon_2008_eurogp.html. Retrieved 2008-05-01. 
23. ^ V. Garcia and E. Debreuve and M. Barlaud. Fast k nearest neighbor search using GPU. In Proceedings of the CVPR Workshop on Computer Vision on GPU, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, June 2008.
24. ^ http://developer.amd.com/gpu/AMDAPPSDK/assets/OpenVideo_Decode_API.PDF OpenVideo Decode (OVD) API
25. ^ http://www.tuaw.com/2011/01/20/xbmc-for-ios-and-atv2-now-available/ XBMC for iOS and Apple TV now available
26. ^ "MATLAB Adds GPGPU Support". 2010-09-20. http://www.hpcwire.com/features/MATLAB-Adds-GPGPU-Support-103307084.html. 

External links

• GPU Specifications, Comparison, and Performance Charts
• NVIDIA - What is a GPU?^{[dead link]}
• The GPU Gems book series
• - a Graphics Hardware History
• Toms Hardware GPU beginners' Guide
• General-Purpose Computation Using Graphics Hardware
• How GPUs work
• GPU Caps Viewer - Video card information utility
• OpenGPU-GPU Architecture(In Chinese)
• ARM Mali GPUs Overview