The Economist

The Economist
The Economist
Acropolis Now (Economist cover, May 1 2010).jpg
Type Weekly Newsmagazine
Format Magazine
Owner The Economist Group
Founder James Wilson
Editor John Micklethwait
Founded September 1843
Political alignment Economic liberalism

25 St James's Street

Circulation over 1.6 million copies per week
ISSN 0013-0613
Official website

The Economist is an English-language weekly news and international affairs publication owned by The Economist Newspaper Ltd. and edited in offices in the City of Westminster, London, England.[1][2] Continuous publication began under founder James Wilson in September 1843. The Economist refers to itself as a newspaper, but each print edition appears on small glossy paper, like a news magazine and its YouTube channel is called EconomistMagazine[3]. In 2009, it reported an average circulation of just over 1.6 million copies per issue,[4] above half of which are sold in North America and English speaking countries.[5]

The Economist claims it "is not a chronicle of economics."[6] Rather, it aims "to take part in a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress."[7] It takes an editorial stance which is supportive of free trade, globalisation, government health and education spending[citation needed], as well as other, more limited forms of governmental intervention. It targets highly educated readers and claims an audience containing many influential executives and policy-makers.[8]

The publication belongs to The Economist Group, half of which is owned by the Financial Times, a subsidiary of Pearson PLC. A group of independent shareholders, including many members of the staff and the Rothschild banking family of England,[9] owns the rest. A board of trustees formally appoints the editor, who cannot be removed without its permission. In addition, about two thirds of the 75 staff journalists are based in London, despite the global emphasis.[10]



Front page of The Economist, on 16 May 1846

The Economist was founded by the Scottish businessman and banker James Wilson in 1843, to advance the repeal of the corn laws, a system of import tariffs.[11] 5 August 1843 prospectus for the "newspaper," enumerated thirteen areas of coverage that its editors wanted the newspaper to focus on:[12]

  1. Original leading articles, in which free-trade principles will be most rigidly applied to all the important questions of the day.
  2. Articles relating to some practical, commercial, agricultural, or foreign topic of passing interest, such as foreign treaties.
  3. An article on the elementary principles of political economy, applied to practical experience, covering the laws related to prices, wages, rent, exchange, revenue and taxes.
  4. Parliamentary reports, with particular focus on commerce, agriculture and free trade.
  5. Reports and accounts of popular movements advocating free trade.
  6. General news from the Court of St. James's, the Metropolis, the Provinces, Scotland, and Ireland.
  7. Commercial topics such as changes in fiscal regulations, the state and prospects of the markets, imports and exports, foreign news, the state of the manufacturing districts, notices of important new mechanical improvements, shipping news, the money market, and the progress of railways and public companies.
  8. Agricultural topics, including the application of geology and chemistry; notices of new and improved implements, state of crops, markets, prices, foreign markets and prices converted into English money; from time to time, in some detail, the plans pursued in Belgium, Switzerland, and other well-cultivated countries.
  9. Colonial and foreign topics, including trade, produce, political and fiscal changes, and other matters, including exposés on the evils of restriction and protection, and the advantages of free intercourse and trade.
  10. Law reports, confined chiefly to areas important to commerce, manufacturing, and agriculture.
  11. Books, confined chiefly, but not so exclusively, to commerce, manufacturing, and agriculture, and including all treatises on political economy, finance, or taxation.
  12. A commercial gazette, with prices and statistics of the week.
  13. Correspondence and inquiries from the newsmagazine's readers.

In 1845 during Railway Mania, The Economist changed its name to The Economist, Weekly Commercial Times, Bankers' Gazette, and Railway Monitor. A Political, Literary and General Newspaper.[13]

It has long been respected as "one of the most competent and subtle Western periodicals on public affairs."[14]


When the newsmagazine was founded, the term "economism" denoted what would today be termed "economic liberalism". The Economist generally supports free markets, globalisation,[15] and free immigration, has been described as neo-liberal although occasionally accepting the propositions of Keynesian economics where deemed more "reasonable".[16] Furthermore, the Economist has also long supported government health and education spending[citation needed]. It also supports social liberalism, including legalised drugs and prostitution. The news magazine favours a carbon tax to fight global warming.[17] According to former editor Bill Emmott, "the Economist's philosophy has always been liberal, not conservative."[18] Individual contributors take diverse views.

The Economist has endorsed both the Labour Party (in 2005) and the Conservative Party (in 2010[19]) at general election time in Britain, and both Republican and Democratic candidates in the United States. puts its stance this way:

What, besides free trade and free markets, does The Economist believe in? "It is to the Radicals that The Economist still likes to think of itself as belonging. The extreme centre is the paper's historical position." That is as true today as when former Economist editor Geoffrey Crowther said it in 1955. The Economist considers itself the enemy of privilege, pomposity and predictability. It has backed conservatives such as Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. It has supported the Americans in Vietnam. But it has also endorsed Harold Wilson and Bill Clinton, and espoused a variety of liberal causes: opposing capital punishment from its earliest days, while favouring penal reform and decolonisation, as well as—more recently—gun control and gay marriage.[20]

The Economist frequently accuses figures and countries of corruption or dishonesty. In recent years, for example, it criticised former World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz; Silvio Berlusconi, Italy's Prime Minister (who dubbed it The Ecommunist[21]); Laurent-Désiré Kabila, the late president of the Democratic Republic of the Congo; Robert Mugabe, the head of government in Zimbabwe; and, recently, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, the president of Argentina.[22] The Economist also called for Bill Clinton's impeachment and later for Donald Rumsfeld's resignation after the emergence of the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse.[23] The Economist initially was a vocal supporter for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, but it has since called the operation "bungled from the start" and criticised the "almost criminal negligence" of the Bush Administration’s handling of the war, while maintaining, as of April 2008, that pulling out in the short term would be irresponsible.[24] In the 2004 U.S. election, the editors "reluctantly" backed John Kerry.[25][26] In the 2008 U.S. election the newsmagazine endorsed Barack Obama, while using the election eve issue's front cover to promote his candidacy.[27]

The paper has also supported some liberal causes such as recognition of gay marriages,[28] legalisation of drugs,[29] and progressive taxation, criticising the U.S. tax model in a recent issue,[citation needed] and seems to support some government regulation on health issues, such as smoking in public[citation needed], as well as bans on spanking children.[30] The Economist consistently favours guest worker programs, parental choice of school, and amnesties[31] and once published an "obituary" of God.[32] The Economist also has a long record of supporting gun control.[33]

Mission statement

On the contents page of each newsmagazine, The Economist's mission statement is written in italics. It states that The Economist was 'First published in September 1843 to take part in "a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress".'[7]

Tone and voice

The editorial staff enforces a uniform voice throughout its pages,[34] as if most articles were written by a single author, displaying dry, understated wit, and precise use of language.[35][36]

The paper's treatment of economics presumes a working familiarity with fundamental concepts of classical economics. For instance, it does not explain terms like invisible hand, macroeconomics, or demand curve, and may take just six or seven words to explain the theory of comparative advantage. However, articles involving economics do not presume any formal training on the part of the reader and aim to be accessible to the educated layman. The newsmagazine usually does not translate short French quotes or phrases, and sentences in Ancient Greek or Latin are not uncommon. It does, however, describe the business or nature of even well-known entities, writing, for example, "Goldman Sachs, an investment bank."[37]

Many articles include some witticism; image captions are often humorous puns and the letters section usually concludes with an odd or light-hearted letter. These efforts at humour have sometimes had a mixed reception. For example, the cover of 20 September 2003 issue, headlined by a story on the WTO ministerial meeting in Cancún, featured a cactus giving the middle finger.[38] Readers sent both positive and negative letters in response.[39]

Editorial anonymity

The Economist does not print by-lines identifying the authors of articles, other than surveys and special "by invitation" contributions. The editors say this is necessary because "collective voice and personality matter more than the identities of individual journalists"[40] and reflects “a collaborative effort.”[41] In most articles authors refer to themselves as "your correspondent" or "this reviewer." The writers of the titled opinion columns tend to refer to themselves by the title (hence, a sentence in the "Lexington" column might read "Lexington was informed...").

Critics say editorial anonymity gives the publication an "omniscient tone and pedantry" and hides the youth and inexperience of those writing articles. “The magazine is written by young people pretending to be old people,” quipped American author Michael Lewis in 1991. “If American readers got a look at the pimply complexions of their economic gurus, they would cancel their subscriptions in droves.”[42] John Ralston Saul describes The Economist as a "magazine which hides the names of the journalists who write its articles in order to create the illusion that they dispense disinterested truth rather than opinion. This sales technique, reminiscent of pre-Reformation Catholicism, is not surprising in a publication named after the social science most given to wild guesses and imaginary facts presented in the guise of inevitability and exactitude. That it is the Bible of the corporate executive indicates to what extent received wisdom is the daily bread of a managerial civilization."[43]


Each Economist issue's official date range is from Saturday to the next Friday. In the UK print copies are dispatched late Thursday, for Friday delivery to retail outlets. Elsewhere, retail outlets and subscribers receive their copies on Friday or (more often) Saturday, depending on their location. The Economist online posts each week's new content on Thursday afternoon, ahead of the official publication date.

Circulation for the news-magazine, audited by the Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC), was over 1.2 million for the first half of 2007.[44] Sales inside North America were around 54 percent of the total, with sales in the UK making up 14 percent of the total and continental Europe 19 percent. The Economist claims sales, both by subscription and at newsagents, in over 200 countries. Global sales have doubled since 1997. Of its American readers, two out of three make more than $100,000 a year.[45]

The Economist once boasted about its limited circulation. In the early 1990s it used the slogan "The Economist – not read by millions of people." "Never in the history of journalism has so much been read for so long by so few," wrote Geoffrey Crowther, a former editor.[46]

The Economist Newspaper Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Economist Group. The publications of the group include the CFO brand family as well as the annual The World in..., the lifestyle quarterly Intelligent Life, European Voice, and Roll Call. Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild was Chairman of the company from 1972 to 1989.


The Economist frequently receives letters from senior businesspeople, politicians and spokespeople for government departments, non-governmental organisations and lobbies, but well written or witty responses from anyone are considered, and controversial issues frequently produce a torrent of letters. For example, the survey of corporate social responsibility, published January 2005, produced largely critical letters from Oxfam, the World Food Programme, United Nations Global Compact, the Chairman of BT Group, an ex-Director of Shell and the UK Institute of Directors.[47]

Many of the letters published are critical of its stance or commentary. After The Economist ran a critique of Amnesty International and human rights in general in its issue dated 24 March 2007, its letters page ran a vibrant reply from Amnesty, as well as several other letters in support of the organisation, including one from the head of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights.[48] Rebuttals from officials within regimes such as the Singapore government are routinely printed, to comply with local right-of-reply laws without compromising editorial independence.[49] It is extremely rare for any comment by The Economist to appear alongside any published letter. Letters published in the newsmagazine are typically between 150 and 200 words long (and begin with the ritual salutation "Sir"). Previous to a change in procedure, all responses to on-line articles were usually published in "The Inbox". However, now comments can be made directly under each article.


The Economist's primary focus is world news, politics and business, but it also runs regular sections on science and technology as well as books and the arts. Approximately every two weeks, the publication adds an in-depth special report on a particular issue, business sector or geographical region. Every three months, it publishes a technology report called Technology Quarterly or TQ.

Articles often take a definite editorial stance and almost never carry a byline. Not even the name of the editor (from 2006, John Micklethwait) is printed in the issue. It is a long-standing tradition that an editor's only signed article during his tenure is written on the occasion of his departure from the position. The author of a piece is named in certain circumstances: when notable persons are invited to contribute opinion pieces; when journalists of The Economist compile special reports; and to highlight a potential conflict of interest over a book review. The names of The Economist editors and correspondents can be located, however, via the media directory pages of the website.

The publication's writers adopt a tight style that seeks to include the maximum amount of information in a limited space.[50] Atlantic Monthly publisher David G. Bradley described the formula as "a consistent world view expressed, consistently, in tight and engaging prose."[51]

There is a section of economic statistics. Tables such as employment statistics are published each week and there are special statistical features too. It is unique among British weeklies in providing authoritative coverage of official statistics and its rankings of international statistics have been decisive.[52] In addition, The Economist is known for its Big Mac Index, which it first published in 1986, which uses the price of the hamburger in different countries as an informal measure of the purchasing power of currencies.[53][54]

The publication runs several opinion columns whose names reflect their topic:

  • Bagehot (Britain) — named for Walter Bagehot (play /ˈbæət/), nineteenth-century British constitutional expert and early editor of The Economist. Since July 2010 it has been written by David Rennie.
  • Charlemagne (Europe) — named for Charlemagne, Emperor of the Frankish Empire.
  • Lexington (United States) — named for Lexington, Massachusetts, the site of the beginning of the American Revolutionary War. Since June 2010 it has been written by Peter David.
  • Buttonwood (Finance) — named for the buttonwood tree where early Wall Street traders gathered. Until September 2006 this was available only as an on-line column, but it is now included in the print edition. It is written by Philip Coggan.
  • Banyan (Asia) — named for the banyan tree, this column was established in April 2009 and focuses on various issues across the Asian continent, and is written by Dominic Ziegler.
  • Baobab (Africa & Middle East) — named for the baobab tree, this column was established in July 2010 and focuses on various issues across the African continent.
  • Babbage (Technology) — named for the inventor Charles Babbage, this column was established in March 2010 and focuses on various technology related issues.
  • Prospero (Books and arts) — named after the character from William Shakespeare's play, The Tempest, this column reviews books and focuses on arts-related issues.
  • Game Theory {Sport) — named after the science of predicting outcomes in a certain situation this column focuses on "sports major and minor" and "the politics, economics, science and statistics of the games we play and watch."
  • Schumpeter (Business) — named for the economist Joseph Schumpeter, this column was established on September 2009 and is written by Adrian Wooldridge.

Other regular features include:

  • Face Value about prominent people in the business world
  • Economics Focus: a general economics column, frequently based on academic research
  • An obituary
  • sections on science and the arts

The newsmagazine goes to press on Thursdays, between 6 and 7pm GMT, and is available on newsstands in many countries the next day. It is printed at seven sites around the world. Known on their website as 'This week's print edition', it is available online, albeit with only the first 5 viewed articles being free (was only available to subscribers between mid-October 2009–2010)

The Economist also produces the annual The World in [Year] publication. It also sponsors a writing award.

Innovation Awards

In addition, it sponsors yearly "The Economist Innovation Awards", in the categories of bioscience, computing and communications, energy and the environment, social and economic innovation, business-process innovation, consumer products and a special “no boundaries” category.

Notable winners include Niklas Zennström (2006).


Sections of The Economist criticising authoritarian regimes are frequently removed from the magazine by the authorities in those countries. The Economist regularly has difficulties with the ruling party of Singapore (the People's Action Party), which had successfully sued it, in a Singaporean court, for libel.[55]

The Economist, like many other publications, is subjected to censorship in India whenever it depicts a map of Kashmir. The maps are stamped by Indian Customs officials as being "neither correct, nor authentic". Issues are sometimes delayed, but not stopped or seized.[56]

On 15 June 2006 Iran banned the sale of The Economist when it published a map labelling the Persian Gulf simply as "Gulf"—a choice that derives its political significance from the Persian Gulf naming dispute.[57]

In a separate incident, Robert Mugabe's government in Zimbabwe went further and imprisoned The Economist's correspondent there, Andrew Meldrum. The government charged him with violating a statute on "publishing untruth" for writing that a woman was decapitated by Mugabe supporters. The decapitation claim was retracted and allegedly fabricated by the woman's husband. The correspondent was later acquitted, only to receive a deportation order.[58]

Special features

Roughly every two weeks, The Economist publishes special reports (previously called surveys) on a given topic (list of special reports). The five main categories are Countries and Regions, Business, Finance and Economics, Science and Technology, and Other. The reports are series of (bylined) summary and analysis articles. Every three months, it publishes a "Technology Quarterly," a special section focusing on recent trends and developments in science and technology.

Since July 2007,[59] there has also been a complete audio edition of the news-magazine available 5pm London time on Fridays, the day after the print news-magazine's publication. A group of British newsreaders records the full text of the news-magazine in mp3 format, including the extra pages in the UK edition. The weekly 130 MB download is free for subscribers and available for a fee for non-subscribers.


The editors of The Economist have been:



During the 1970s, the Economist's reports on South Africa were written by South African journalist Allister Sparks. Business reports were written by Graham Hatton and other reports by Benjamin Pogrund. All articles were edited (but not rewritten) by an Africa editor in London. This was John Grimond during the first half of the 1970s. The magazine's "Foreign Report", also published during the 1970s, was edited by Robert Moss.[64]


Shapur Kharegat was the Asia director from the creation of the office until 1992.


In 1991, James Fallows argued in The Washington Post that The Economist suffers from British class snobbery, pretentiousness, and simplistic argumentation, and "unwholesomely purveys smarty-pants English attitudes on our [US] shores". He also accused it of an editorial line often contradicted by the news stories.[42] Andrew Sullivan complained in the New Republic that it uses “marketing genius” to make up for deficiencies in analysis and original reporting, resulting in “a kind of Reader's Digest[65] for America’s corporate elite.[66] While Sullivan did acknowledge that the magazine's claim about the dotcom bursting would probably be accurate in the long run,[65] the bubble would not burst in the US market until 2001.[67] Sullivan also pointed out that the magazine greatly exaggerated the danger the US economy was in after the Dow Jones fell to 7,400 during the 1998 Labor Day weekend and noted that the magazine's claim that the US economy was at a high risk of entering a recession was far from clear.[65] He also said that The Economist is editorially constrained because so many scribes graduated from the same college at Oxford University, Magdalen College,[65] which he described as "a somewhat ineffective system for correcting internal flaws in a global magazine."[65] The Observer wrote that "its writers rarely see a political or economic problem that cannot be solved by the trusted three-card trick of privatisation, deregulation and liberalisation."[68]

The former editor of Newsweek Jon Meacham, although he still described himself as a "fan", criticises The Economist's focus on analysis over original reporting.[69]

In 2011, the Hindu American Foundation criticized an article on India in The Economist for ignoring the religious sensitivities of Hindus and depicting Hindu religious icons in a negative and demonizing light. The editors of the Economist have been dismissive of HAF's request to address the issue[70] In the same year, the government of Bangladesh criticized another South Asia-related article by the Economist for "irresponsible journalism" and "blatant lies" for claiming that the secular Awami League party was covertly funded by India, and that relations between India and Bangladesh were combative and hostile, an assertion that was strongly disputed in a communication sent to The Economist by the government.[71]

Appearance in popular culture

The Simpsons episode "Catch 'Em If You Can" alluded to the snob appeal of The Economist in an exchange between Homer and Marge Simpson while they are travelling first-class aboard an airplane:

Homer: "Look at me, I'm reading The Economist! Did you know Indonesia is at a crossroads?"
Marge: "No!"
Homer: "It is!"

Four days later, The Economist alluded to the quote, and published an article about Indonesia referring to the "crossroads". The title of the issue was "Indonesia's Gambit", as in The Simpsons' episode.[72][73] About seven months later, The Economist ran a cover headline reading "Indonesia at a Crossroads."[74] In April 2009, The Economist published an article on Indonesian democracy with the title "Beyond the crossroads".[75] The show returned to the joke in a much later episode, "Million Dollar Maybe". In return for a favour Homer offers another character, Barney Gumble, the contents of a tree containing his stash of "adult magazines". These turn out to be issues of The Economist, one of which features the headline "New challenges for Indonesia".

In 2006, Indian actor Abhishek Bachchan starred in a Motorola KRZR advertisement where one flight attendant asked if he wanted anything to read. He said "The Economist, please", which resulted in the young lady sitting next to him rolling her eyes and his mirror image called him a "fraud". He settles for Stardust instead.[76]


  1. ^ "Locations." Economist Group. Retrieved on 12 September 2009.
  2. ^ "Maps." City of Westminster. Retrieved on 28 August 2009.
  3. ^ [1]
  4. ^ "Worldwide circulation vitality". The Economist. Retrieved 3 October 2009. 
  5. ^ "E.M. O'Rorke subscription letter". NPR. Retrieved 27 April 2008. 
  6. ^ "How our readers view The Economist". The Economist. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  7. ^ a b "Opinion: leaders and letters to the Editor". The Economist. Retrieved 1 May 2011. 
  8. ^ "How our readers view The Economist". The Economist. Archived from the original on 7 September 2006. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  9. ^ Brook, Stephen (25 February 2008). "Let the bad times roll". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 26 March 2010. 
  10. ^ "So what's the secret of 'The Economist'?". The Independent (London). 26 February 2006. Retrieved 27 April 2008. 
  11. ^ From the Corn Laws to Your Mailbox, The MIT Press Log, 30 Jan. 2007. Retrieved 11 June 2010.
  12. ^ "Prospectus". The Economist. 5 August 1843. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  13. ^ "The many paradoxes of broadband". Retrieved 27 December 2006.  (subscription required) This scholarly paper was written in 1952
  14. ^ Nathan Leites (1952). "The Politburo Through Western Eyes". World Politics 4 (2): 159–185. doi:10.2307/2009044. JSTOR 2009044. (subscription required)
  15. ^ "Globalisation: The redistribution of hope". The Economist. 16 December 2010. Retrieved 23 April 2011. 
  16. ^ George Monbiot, Punitive – and it works, The Guardian, 11 January 2005
  17. ^ Buttonwood, The Economist, 14 June 2008
  18. ^ Emmot, Bill (8 December 2000). "Time for a referendum on the monarchy". Comment (London).,2763,408484,00.html. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  19. ^ "The Economist backs the Conservatives", The Guardian (PA report), 29 April 2010
  20. ^ "About us". The Economist. Retrieved 1 May 2011. 
  21. ^ "Report of Rome anti-war demo on Saturday 24th with photos". Independent Media Center. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  22. ^ "Cristina in the land of make believe". The Economist. 1 May 2008. 
  23. ^ "Resign Rumsfeld". The Economist. 6 May 2004. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  24. ^ "Mugged by reality". The Economist. 22 March 2007. Retrieved 9 April 2007. 
  25. ^ "Crunch time in America". The Economist. 2 November 2000. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  26. ^ "The incompetent or the incoherent?". The Economist. 28 October 2004. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  27. ^ "It's time". The Economist. 30 October 2008. 
  28. ^ Let them wed, cover article on 4 January 1996
  29. ^ How to stop the drug wars, cover article on 7 March 2009. The newspaper calls legalisation "the least bad solution".
  30. ^ Spare The Rod, Say Some, The Economist, 31 May 2008
  31. ^ Sense, not Sensenbrenner, The Economist, 30 March 2006
  32. ^ "Obituary: God". The Economist. 23 December 1999. 
  33. ^ "Lexington: Reflections on Virginia Tech". The Economist. 8 April 2009. Retrieved 13 April 2011. 
  34. ^ "The Economist — Style guide". The Economist. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  35. ^ "The Economist — Tone". The Economist. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  36. ^ "Johnson". The Economist. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  37. ^ "A bank by any other name". The Economist. Retrieved 16 September 2008. 
  38. ^ Issue Cover for 20 Sep 2003,
  39. ^ Letters: Pointing the Finger, The Economist, 2 October 2003
  40. ^ "The Economist — About us". The Economist. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  41. ^ "Economist Editor Micklethwait brings his global perspective to the Twin Cities". 29 April 2008. Retrieved 16 September 2008. 
  42. ^ a b "The Economics of the Colonial Cringe: Pseudonomics and the Sneer on the Face of The Economist.". Washington Post. Retrieved 27 April 2008. 
  43. ^ Saul, John Ralston.The Doubter's Companion: A Dictionary of Aggressive Common Sense Free Press, 1994, p. 115
  44. ^ "Worldwide circulation". The Economist. Retrieved 21 August 2007. 
  45. ^ "'Economist' Magazine Wins American Readers". NPR. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  46. ^ Moseley, Ray. "`Economist' aspires to influence, and many say it does." (pay archive). The Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 14 May 2008. 
  47. ^ "Compilation: Full text of responses to Economist survey on Corporate Social Responsibility (January–February 2005)". Business & Human Rights. Retrieved 3 February 2007. 
  48. ^ "Letters: On Amnesty International and human rights, Iraq, tax breaks 4 April 2007". The Economist. 4 April 2007. Retrieved 9 November 2007. 
  49. ^ The Media Enthralled, Francis T. Seow, 1998, pages 171–175
  50. ^ "The Economist style guide". The Economist. Retrieved 27 December 2006. 
  51. ^ "A Seven Year Ambition". 
  52. ^ Great expectations—the social sciences in Great Britain. Commission on the Social Sciences. 2004. p. 88. ISBN 9780765808493. 
  53. ^ Paul R. Krugman, Maurice Obstfeld (2009). International Economics. Pearson Education. p. 396. ISBN 9780321553980. 
  54. ^ "On the Hamburger Standard". The Economist. 6–12 September 1986. 
  55. ^ "Inconvenient truths in Singapore". Asia Times. Retrieved 31 January 2007. 
  56. ^ "Censorship in India". The Economist. 
  57. ^ "Iran bans The Economist over map". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 31 January 2007. 
  58. ^ "Guardian and RFI correspondent risks two years in jail". Reporters Without Borders. Retrieved 31 January 2007. 
  59. ^ Allen, Katie (11 July 2007). "Economist launches audio magazine". The Guardian (London).,,2124016,00.html. Retrieved 16 August 2007. 
  60. ^ The Concise Dictionary of National Biography makes him assistant editor 1858–1860
  61. ^ He was Wilson's son-in-law
  62. ^ A journalist and biographer[dead link]
  63. ^ 'a solid Scots journalist, Edward Johnstone (1883–1907)'
  64. ^ James Sanders (2000). South Africa and the international media, 1972–1979. Routledge. pp. 34–35. ISBN 0714649791. 
  65. ^ a b c d e "Not so groovy.". The New Republic (London). 14 June 1999.,4273,3874750,00.html. Retrieved 27 April 2008. 
  66. ^ "Nasty barbs fly between New Republic and Economist.". Media Life. Retrieved 27 April 2008. 
  67. ^ "Effects of Recession and Dot Com Bubble". Data and Investment Consult. Retrieved 8 May 2011. 
  68. ^ "Economist thrives on female intuition". The Observer (London). 21 August 2005. Retrieved 26 March 2010. 
  69. ^ "Jon Meacham Wants Newsweek to Be More Like Hayes' Esquire.". New York Observer. Retrieved 27 April 2008. 
  70. ^ Suhag A. Shukla, Esq. Managing Director/Legal Counsel (August 8, 2011). "HAF Correspondence With The Economist". Hindu American Foundation. Retrieved 18 August 2011. 
  71. ^ Md. Shameem Ahsan, Director General (External Publicity), Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Dhaka, Bangladesh (August 5, 2011). "Our article on Bangladesh and India: The government of Bangladesh responds". Communique. The Economist, London. Retrieved 19 August 2011. 
  72. ^ "The electoral week — On the trail". The Economist. 29 April 2004. Retrieved 28 December 2006. 
  73. ^ "Investing in Indonesia". The Economist. 29 April 2004. Retrieved 28 December 2006. 
  74. ^ The Economist, 11 December 2004, cover
  75. ^ The Economist, 11 April 2009
  76. ^ "Moto Krazr". YouTube. Retrieved 23 February 2011. 

Further reading

  • Edwards, Ruth Dudley (1993) The Pursuit of Reason: The Economist 1843–1993, London: Hamish Hamilton, ISBN 0-241-12939-7
  • Mark Tungate (2004). "The Economist". Media Monoliths. Kogan Page Publishers. pp. 194–206. ISBN 9780749441081. 

External links

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • The Economist — Fachgebiet primär Wirtschaft …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • The Economist — Pays  Royaume Uni …   Wikipédia en Français

  • The Economist — еженедельный экономический журнал Обложка журнала The Economist от 1 сентября 2007 года, посвященная Google (надпись на обложке англ …   Википедия

  • The Economist — es una publicación semanal británica de política, relaciones internacionales y negocios. En el 2004, el magacín vendió alrededor de 1 millón de copias por semana. The Economist forma parte de la corporación Economist Group , localizada en Londres …   Enciclopedia Universal

  • The Economist™ — UK US noun ► TRADEMARK a newspaper produced every week in London, which publishes international politics and business news and opinion: »As Matthew Bishop of The Economist points out in this issue, a rise of 10 mobile phones per 100 people boosts …   Financial and business terms

  • (the) Economist — The Economist [The Economist] a weekly British political and economic newspaper that was started in 1843 …   Useful english dictionary

  • The Economist — Este artículo o sección necesita referencias que aparezcan en una publicación acreditada, como revistas especializadas, monografías, prensa diaria o páginas de Internet fidedignas. Puedes añadirlas así o avisar …   Wikipedia Español

  • The Economist editorial stance — The Economist was first published in September 1843 by James Wilson to take part in a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress. This phrase is quoted on its contents… …   Wikipedia

  • The Economist Group — is a group of companies that sell publications and services under The Economist brand, such as The Economist (called a newspaper for historical reasons, but to all appearances a weekly news magazine),, Economist Intelligence Unit,… …   Wikipedia

  • The Economist Group — ist ein in London ansässiger Zeitschriften Verlag. Flaggschiff des Verlags ist die namensgebende Traditionszeitschrift The Economist. Zeitschriften der Gruppe haben eine hohe internationale Verbreitung, ihr Zielpublikum besteht aus… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”