Persistent vegetative state

Persistent vegetative state
Persistent vegetative state
ICD-9 780.03
MeSH D018458

A persistent vegetative state is a disorder of consciousness in which patients with severe brain damage who were in a coma, progress to a state of partial arousal rather than true awareness. It is a diagnosis of some uncertainty in that it deals with a syndrome. After four weeks in a vegetative state (VS), the patient is classified as in a persistent vegetative state. This diagnosis is classified as a permanent vegetative state (PVS) after approximately 1 year of being in a persistent vegetative state.[citation needed]



Medical definition

A wakeful unconscious state that lasts longer than a few weeks is referred to as a persistent vegetative state.[1]

Lack of legal clarity

As opposed to brain death, persistent vegetative state (PVS) is not recognized by statute as death in any legal system. In the US and UK, courts have required petitions before termination of life support that demonstrate that any recovery of cognitive functions above a vegetative state is assessed as impossible by authoritative medical opinion.[2]

This legal grey area has led to vocal advocates that those in PVS should be allowed to die. Others are equally determined that, if recovery is at all possible, care should continue. The existence of a small number of diagnosed PVS cases that have eventually resulted in improvement makes defining recovery as "impossible" particularly difficult in a legal sense.[3] This legal and ethical issue raises questions about autonomy, quality of life, appropriate use of resources, the wishes of family members, and professional responsibilities.


The syndrome was first described in 1940 by Ernst Kretschmer who called it apallic syndrome.[4] The term persistent vegetative state was coined in 1972 by Scottish spinal surgeon Bryan Jennett and American neurologist Fred Plum to describe a syndrome that seemed to have been made possible by medicine's increased capacities to keep patients' bodies alive.[5][6]


There are several definitions that vary by technical versus laymen's usage, and by legal implications in different countries.

The vegetative state is a chronic or long-term condition. This condition differs from a coma: a coma is a state that lacks both awareness and wakefulness. Patients in a vegetative state may have awoken from a coma, but still have not regained awareness. In the vegetative state patients can open their eyelids occasionally and demonstrate sleep-wake cycles, but completely lack cognitive function. The vegetative state is also called a "coma vigil". The chances of regaining awareness diminish considerably as the time spent in the vegetative state increases.[7]

The persistent vegetative state is the standard usage (except in the UK) for a medical diagnosis, made after numerous neurological and other tests, that due to extensive and irrevocable brain damage a patient is highly unlikely ever to achieve higher functions above a vegetative state. This diagnosis does not mean that a doctor has diagnosed improvement as impossible, but does open the possibility, in the US, for a judicial request to end life support.[3] Informal guidelines hold that this diagnosis can be made after four weeks in a vegetative state. US caselaw has shown that successful petitions for termination have been made after a diagnosis of a persistent vegetative state, although in some cases, such as that of Terri Schiavo, such rulings have generated widespread controversy,

In the UK, the persistent vegetative state is discouraged in favor of two more precisely defined terms that have been strongly recommended by the Royal College of Physicians (RCP). These guidelines recommend using a continuous vegetative state for patients in a vegetative state for more than four weeks. A medical definition of a permanent vegetative state can be made if, after exhaustive testing and a customary 12 months of observation,[8] a medical diagnosis that it is impossible by any informed medical expectations that the mental condition will ever improve.[9] Hence, a "continuous vegetative state" in the UK may remain the diagnosis in cases that would be called "persistent" in the US or elsewhere.

While the actual testing criteria for a diagnosis of "permanent" in the UK are quite similar to the criteria for a diagnosis of "persistent" in the US, the semantic difference imparts in the UK a legal presumption that is commonly used in court applications for ending life support.[8] The UK diagnosis is generally only made after 12 months of observing a static vegetative state. A diagnosis of a persistent vegetative state in the US usually still requires a petitioner to prove in court that recovery is impossible by informed medical opinion, while in the UK the "permanent" diagnosis already gives the petitioner this presumption and may make the legal process less time-consuming.[3]

Note that in common usage, the "permanent" and "persistent" definitions are sometimes conflated and used interchangeably. However, the initialism "PVS" is intended to define a "persistent vegetative state", without necessarily the connotations of permanence, and is used as such throughout this article.

Bryan Jennett, who originally coined the term "persistent vegetative state", has now recommended using the UK division between continuous and permanent in his most recent book The Vegetative State. This is one for purposes of precision, on the grounds that "the 'persistent' component of this term ... may seem to suggest irreversibility".[5]

The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council has suggested "post coma unresponsiveness" as an alternative term for "vegetative state" in general.[10]

Signs and symptoms

Most PVS patients are unresponsive to external stimuli and their conditions are associated with different levels of consciousness. Some level of consciousness means a person can still respond, in varying degrees, to stimulation. A person in a coma, however, cannot. In addition, PVS patients often open their eyes in response to feeding, which has to be done by others; they are capable of swallowing, whereas patients in a coma subsist with their eyes closed (Emmett, 1989).

PVS patients' eyes might be in a relatively fixed position, or track moving objects, or move in a disconjugate (i.e. completely unsynchronized) manner. They may experience sleep-wake cycles, or be in a state of chronic wakefulness. They may exhibit some behaviors that can be construed as arising from partial consciousness, such as grinding their teeth, swallowing, smiling, shedding tears, grunting, moaning, or screaming without any apparent external stimulus.

Individuals in PVS are seldom on any life-sustaining equipment other than a feeding tube because the brainstem, the center of vegetative functions (such as heart rate and rhythm, respiration, and gastrointestinal activity) is relatively intact (Emmett, 1989).


There are three causes of PVS(persistent vegetative state):

  1. Acute traumatic brain injury
  2. Non-traumatic: neurodegenerative disorder or metabolic disorder of the brain
  3. Severe congenital abnormality of the central nervous system.

Medical books (such as Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins. (2007). In A Page: Pediatric Signs and Symptoms) describe several potential causes of PVS, which are as follows:

In addition, these authors claim that doctors sometimes use the mnemonic device AEIOU-TIPS to recall portions of the differential diagnosis: Alcohol ingestion and acidosis, Epilepsy and encephalopathy, Infection, Opiates, Uremia, Trauma, Insulin overdose or inflammatory disorders, Poisoning and psychogenic causes, and Shock.


Despite converging agreement about the definition of persistent vegetative state, recent reports have raised concerns about the accuracy of diagnosis in some patients, and the extent to which, in a selection of cases, residual cognitive functions may remain undetected and patients are diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state. Objective assessment of residual cognitive function can be extremely difficult as motor responses may be minimal, inconsistent, and difficult to document in many patients, or may be undetectable in others because no cognitive output is possible (Owen et al., 2002). In recent years, a number of studies have demonstrated an important role for functional neuroimaging in the identification of residual cognitive function in persistent vegetative state; this technology is providing new insights into cerebral activity in patients with severe brain damage. Such studies, when successful, may be particularly useful where there is concern about the accuracy of the diagnosis and the possibility that residual cognitive function has remained undetected.

Diagnostic experiments

Researchers have begun to use functional neuroimaging studies to study implicit cognitive processing in patients with a clinical diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Activations in response to sensory stimuli with positron emission tomography (PET), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and electrophysiological methods can provide information on the presence, degree, and location of any residual brain function. However, use of these techniques in people with severe brain damage is methodologically, clinically, and theoretically complex and needs careful quantitative analysis and interpretation.

For example, PET studies have shown the identification of residual cognitive function in persistent vegetative state. That is, an external stimulation, such as a painful stimulus, still activates 'primary' sensory cortices in these patients but these areas are functionally disconnected from 'higher order' associative areas needed for awareness. These results show that parts of the cortex are indeed still functioning in 'vegetative' patients (Matsuda et al., 2003).

In addition, other PET studies have revealed preserved and consistent responses in predicted regions of auditory cortex in response to intelligible speech stimuli. Moreover, a preliminary fMRI examination revealed partially intact responses to semantically ambiguous stimuli, which are known to tap higher aspects of speech comprehension (Boly, 2004).

Furthermore, several studies have used PET to assess the central processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in patients in PVS. Noxious somatosensory stimulation activated midbrain, contralateral thalamus, and primary somatosensory cortex in each and every PVS patient, even in the absence of detectable cortical evoked potentials. In conclusion, somatosensory stimulation of PVS patients, at intensities that elicited pain in controls, resulted in increased neuronal activity in primary somatosensory cortex, even if resting brain metabolism was severely impaired. However, this activation of primary cortex seems to be isolated and dissociated from higher-order associative cortices (Laureys et al., 2002).

Also, there is evidence of partially functional cerebral regions in catastrophically injured brains. To study five patients in PVS with different behavioral features, researchers employed PET, MRI and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses to sensory stimulation. In three of the five patients, co-registered PET/MRI correlate areas of relatively preserved brain metabolism with isolated fragments of behavior. Two patients had suffered anoxic injuries and demonstrated marked decreases in overall cerebral metabolism to 30–40% of normal. Two other patients with non-anoxic, multifocal brain injuries demonstrated several isolated brain regions with higher metabolic rates, that ranged up to 50–80% of normal. Nevertheless, their global metabolic rates remained <50% of normal. MEG recordings from three PVS patients provide clear evidence for the absence, abnormality or reduction of evoked responses. Despite major abnormalities, however, these data also provide evidence for localized residual activity at the cortical level. Each patient partially preserved restricted sensory representations, as evidenced by slow evoked magnetic fields and gamma band activity. In two patients, these activations correlate with isolated behavioral patterns and metabolic activity. Remaining active regions identified in the three PVS patients with behavioral fragments appear to consist of segregated corticothalamic networks that retain connectivity and partial functional integrity. A single patient who suffered severe injury to the tegmental mesencephalon and paramedian thalamus showed widely preserved cortical metabolism, and a global average metabolic rate of 65% of normal. The relatively high preservation of cortical metabolism in this patient defines the first functional correlate of clinical– pathological reports associating permanent unconsciousness with structural damage to these regions. The specific patterns of preserved metabolic activity identified in these patients reflect novel evidence of the modular nature of individual functional networks that underlie conscious brain function. The variations in cerebral metabolism in chronic PVS patients indicate that some cerebral regions can retain partial function in catastrophically injured brains (Schiff et al., 2002).


Misdiagnosis of PVS is not uncommon. One study of 40 patients in the United Kingdom reported that 43% of those patients classified as in a PVS were misdiagnosed and another 33% able to recover whilst the study was underway.[12] Some cases of PVS may actually be cases of patients being in an undiagnosed minimally conscious state.[13] Since the exact diagnostic criteria of the minimally conscious state were formulated only in 2002, there may be chronic patients diagnosed as PVS before the notion of the minimally conscious state became known.

Whether or not there is conscious awareness in vegetative state is a prominent issue. Three completely different aspects of this issue should be distinguished. First, some patients can be conscious simply because they are misdiagnosed (see above). In fact, they are not in vegetative state. Second, sometimes a patient was correctly diagnosed but, then, examined during a beginning recovery. Third, perhaps some day the very notion of the vegetative state will change so as to include elements of conscious awareness. Inability to disentangle these three cases leads to confusion. An example of such confusion is the response to a recent experiment using magnetic resonance imaging which revealed that a woman diagnosed with PVS was able to activate predictable portions of her brain in response to the tester's requests that she imagine herself playing tennis or moving from room to room in her house. The brain activity in response to these instructions was indistinguishable from those of healthy patients.[14][15][16]

In 2010, Martin Monti and fellow researchers, working at the MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit at the University of Cambridge, reported in an article in the New England Journal of Medicine [17] that some patients in persistent vegetative states actually had enough consciousness to respond to verbal instructions by displaying different pattens of brain activity on fMRI scans. Five out of a total of 54 diagnosed patients were apparently able to respond when instructed to think about one of two different physical activities. One of these five was also able to "answer" yes or no questions, again by imagining one of these two activities.[18] It is unclear, however, whether the fact that portions of the patients' brains light up on fMRI will help these patient assume their own medical decision making.[18] Professor Geraint Rees, Director of the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience at University College London, responded to the study by observing that:

"As a clinician, it would be important to satisfy oneself that the individual that you are communicating with is competent to make those decisions. At the moment it is premature to conclude that the individual able to answer 5 out of 6 yes/no questions is fully conscious like you or I."[18]

In contrast, Jacob M. Appel of the Mount Sinai Hospital told UK newspaper The Telegraph that this development could be a welcome step toward clarifying the wishes of such patients. Appel stated:

`"I see no reason why, if we are truly convinced such patients are communicating, society should not honour their wishes. In fact, as a physician, I think a compelling case can be made that doctors have an ethical obligation to assist such patients by removing treatment. I suspect that, if such individuals are indeed trapped in their bodies, they may be living in great torment and will request to have their care terminated or even active euthanasia."[18]

In November 2011, an publication in The Lancet presented bedside EEG apparatus and indicated that its signal could be used to detect awareness in three of 16 patients diagnosed in the vegetative state.[19]


Many patients emerge spontaneously from a vegetative state within a few weeks.[5] The chances of recovery depend on the extent of injury to the brain and the patient's age — younger patients having a better chance of recovery than older patients. Generally, adults have a 50 percent chance and children a 60 percent chance of recovering consciousness from a PVS within the first 6 months. After a year, the chances that a PVS patient will regain consciousness are very low and most patients who do recover consciousness experience significant disability. The longer a patient is in a PVS, the more severe the resulting disabilities are likely to be. Rehabilitation can contribute to recovery, but many patients never progress to the point of being able to take care of themselves. Recovery after long periods of time in a PVS has been reported on several occasions and are often treated as spectacular events.

There are two dimensions of recovery from a persistent vegetative state: recovery of consciousness and recovery of function. Recovery of consciousness can be verified by reliable evidence of awareness of self and the environment, consistent voluntary behavioral responses to visual and auditory stimuli, and interaction with others. Recovery of function is characterized by communication, the ability to learn and to perform adaptive tasks, mobility, self-care, and participation in recreational or vocational activities. Recovery of consciousness may occur without functional recovery, but functional recovery cannot occur without recovery of consciousness (Ashwal, 1994).

Possible treatment and cures

Currently no treatment for vegetative state exists that would satisfy the efficacy criteria of evidence-based medicine. Several methods have been proposed which can roughly be subdivided into four categories: pharmacological methods, surgery, physical therapy, and various stimulation techniques. Pharmacological therapy mainly uses activating substances such as tricyclic antidepressants or methylphenidate. Promising results have been reported on dopaminergic drugs such as amantadine and bromocriptine.[20] Presently[when?] the first randomized controlled trial amantadine versus placebo is running[where?]; its results have not been published yet. Surgical methods such as deep brain stimulation are used less frequently due to the invasiveness of the procedures. Stimulation techniques include sensory stimulation, sensory regulation, music and musicokinetic therapy, social-tactile interaction, etc. Below are some details related to treatments that have demonstrated some hope.


There is currently limited evidence that the imidazopyridine hypnotic drug zolpidem (Stilnox/Ambien) can have positive behavioral effects in some PVS patients.[21] The first such putative case is Louis Viljoen, who was hit by a vehicle in 1994, leaving him in a persistent vegetative state. Five years later when Viljoen was having involuntary spasms in his left arm, his physician, H Wally Nel, treated him with zolpidem. Twenty-five minutes after the treatment, Viljoen started murmuring and then conversing, albeit not fluently, with his mother. In magnetic resonance images of his brain before and after treatment with zolpidem, the damaged brain regions, which appeared black and dead before treatment, began to light up with neural activity afterwards. Following seven years of further treatment with zolpidem, Viljoen can now speak in complex sentences and move his head and arms. The physician, Nel, who treated Viljoen claims to have treated 150 further PVS patients with zolpidem and seen improvements in approximately 60% of them.[22][23]

Additionally, stroke victims and patients with head injuries or brain damage following oxygen deprivation, such as near-drowning victims, have reported significant improvements in speech, motor functions, and concentration after treatment with zolpidem.[23][unreliable medical source?]

A clinical trial of zolpidem involving over 360 PVS patients worldwide is currently underway, and 60% of these patients are showing signs of improvement, although no results have yet been published.[24]

There is one other published[where?] case series on the long-term effects of zolpidem on patients in PVS, also authored by Nel & Clauss. The first patient, "L", is a 31 year old male who, before treatment with zolpidem, had been in PVS for three years with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 9. They report that after receiving 10 mg of zolpidem, L is able to engage in meaningful conversation. The maximum effect of the zolpidem is seen one hour after application and wears off after about four hours. By the date of publication in 2006, L had been receiving zolpidem therapy for six years, with no decrease in the effectiveness of treatment, and some gradual long-term improvement in short- and long-term memory. The other two patients in the case series were male, of similar age, and had similar though somewhat lessened responses to zolpidem — the zolpidem worked maximally one hour after application, its effects wore off after four hours, and there was no decrease in effectiveness after several years of daily use.[25]

As yet, few scientific studies have been published on the effectiveness of zolpidem as a treatment for PVS and the results have been sometimes contradictory [26][27]


In addition, there have been several case studies analyzed that emphasize another pharmacological possibility of treatment for patients in a persistent vegetative state. Three patients whose brains had been damaged by severe head injury recovered from a persistent vegetative state after the administration of a drug called levodopa, which boosts the body's dopamine levels. In all three cases, the patients were deeply comatose on arrival to the hospital, remained unresponsive to simple verbal commands, and their condition was unchanged for a lengthy period of time even after intensive treatment including surgery. All three patients were diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state for three, seven, and twelve months respectively (Matsuda et al., 2003).

Case 1 describes a 14 year old boy who, three months after his trauma, could not follow moving objects with his eyes and experienced tremor-like involuntary movements as well as hypertonicity (increased tension of the muscles, meaning the muscle tone is abnormally rigid, hampering proper movement). Levodopa was recommended to relieve the patient’s parkinsonian features. Surprisingly, after nine days of treatment the patient’s involuntary movements were reduced and he began to respond toward voices. Three months after treatment, he was able to walk and obtained the intelligence of an elementary school child. One year after his trauma, he was able to walk to high school by himself. Case 2 involves a young adult who underwent deep brain stimulation one year after the trauma and showed no improvement. Levodopa was administered and one year later, once his tubes were removed, he said, “I want to eat sushi and drink beer!” Case 3 describes a middle-aged man who experienced spasticity of his extremities, was administered levodopa, and was able to say his name and address correctly after only two months. After neurological evaluation, all three cases revealed asymmetrical rigidity or tremor and presynaptic damage in the dopaminergic (uses dopamine as neurotransmitter) systems. In conclusion, levodopa should be considered for patients in a persistent vegetative state with atypical features in their limbs and who have MRI evidence of lesions in the dopaminergic pathway, particularly presynaptic lesions in areas such as the substantia nigra or ventral tegmentum. Data shows that only 6% of adult patients recover after being in a vegetative state for six to twelve months. This poor recovery rate demonstrates the significance in the rapid recovery of patients that begin levodopa treatment, particularly in those who were in a vegetative state for almost a year.


This unexpected and late recovery of consciousness raises an interesting hypothesis of possible effects of partially regained spinal cord outputs on reactivation of cognition. Other case studies have shown that recovery of consciousness with persistent severe disability 19 months after a non-traumatic brain injury was at least in part triggered and maintained by intrathecal baclofen administration (Sarà M et al., 2007).

Removal of cold intubated oxygen

Another documented case reports recovery of a small number of patients following the removal of assisted respiration with cold oxygen. The researchers found that in many nursing homes and hospitals unheated oxygen is given to non-responsive patients via tracheal intubation. This bypasses the warming of the upper respiratory tract and causes a chilling of aortic blood and chilling of the brain. The researchers describe a small number of cases in which removal of the chilled oxygen was followed by recovery from the PVS and recommend either warming of oxygen with a heated nebulizer or removal of the assisted oxygen if it is no longer needed. The authors further recommend additional research to determine if this chilling effect may either delay recovery or even may contribute to brain damage.[28]

Bifocal extradural cortical stimulation

In December 2008, Dr Sergio Canavero, Director of the Advanced Neuromodulation Group based in Turin, Italy and one of the leading experts in the field of cortical stimulation, announced that a girl (Greta) in the permanent vegetative state (i.e. vegetative state lasting more than 12 months), recovered consciousness and was regraded as minimally conscious following several months of bifocal extradural cortical stimulation (Canavero et al. 2009), a minimally invasive neurosurgical technique he and others developed for the treatment of central pain, Parkinson's disease, stroke rehabilitation, depression, and other neurologic and psychiatric disorders (Canavero 2009). Simultaneous stimulation of the fronto-parietal "consciousness" network achieved a marked improvement of the default network of the brain. A measure of voluntary resposiveness has been obtained and be fed more normally per os. Previous attempts at deep brain stimulation - Terri Schiavo being one of the patients - failed to restore consciousness.This kind of stimulation can also be guided by results of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as this was able to transitorily improve a patient in PVS (Dr Pape, Chicago 2009) and another in the minimally conscious state (2010).


In the United States, it is estimated that there may be between 15,000-40,000 patients who are in a persistent vegetative state, but due to poor nursing home records exact figures are hard to determine.[29]

Ethics and policy

An ongoing debate exists as to how much care, if any, patients in a persistent vegetative state should receive in health system plagued by limited resources. In a case pending before the New Jersey Superior Court, Betancourt v. Trinitas, a community hospital is seeking a ruling that dialysis and CPR for such a patient constitutes futile care. An American bioethicist, Jacob M. Appel, has argued that any money spent treating PVS patients would be better spent on other patients with a higher likelihood of recovery.[30]

Notable PVS patients

See also


  1. ^ The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS (1994). "Medical Aspects of the Persistent Vegetative State— First of Two Parts". New England Journal of Medicine 330 (21): 1499–1508. doi:10.1056/NEJM199405263302107. PMID 7818633. 
  2. ^ Jennett, B (1999). "Should cases of permanent vegetative state still go to court?. Britain should follow other countries and keep the courts for cases of dispute". BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 319 (7213): 796–7. PMC 1116645. PMID 10496803. 
  3. ^ a b c Diagnosing The Permanent Vegetative State by Ronald Cranford, MD
  4. ^ Ernst Kretschmer (1940). "Das apallische Syndrom". Neurol. Psychiat 169: 576–579. doi:10.1007/BF02871384. 
  5. ^ a b c Bryan Jennett (PDF). The Vegetative State: Medical facts, ethical and legal dilemmas. University of Glasgow: Scotland. Retrieved 2007-11-09. 
  6. ^ B Jennett and F Plum (1972). "Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: A syndrome in search of a name". The Lancet 1 (7753): 734–737. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(72)90242-5. PMID 4111204. 
  7. ^
  8. ^ a b Wade, DT; Johnston, C (1999). "The permanent vegetative state: Practical guidance on diagnosis and management". BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 319 (7213): 841–4. PMC 1116668. PMID 10496834. 
  9. ^ Guidance on diagnosis and management: Report of a working party of the Royal College of Physicians. Royal College of Physicians: London. 1996. 
  10. ^ Post-coma unresponsiveness (Vegetative State): a clinical framework for diagnosis. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC): Canberra. 2003. 
  11. ^ Myoclonic status epilepticus following repeated oral ingestion of colloidal silver PMID 15111684
  12. ^ K Andrews, L Murphy, R Munday, and C Littlewood (1996-07-06). "Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit". British Medical Journal 313 (7048): 13–16. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7048.13. PMC 2351462. PMID 8664760. 
  13. ^ Giacino JT et al. (2002). "Unknown title". Neurology 58 (3): 349–353. PMID 11839831. 
  14. ^ Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, Davis MH, Laureys S, and Pickard JD (2006-09-08). "Detecting awareness in the vegetative state". Science 313 (5792): 1402. doi:10.1126/science.1130197. PMID 16959998. 
  15. ^ "Vegetative patient 'communicates': A patient in a vegetative state can communicate just through using her thoughts, according to research". BBC News. September 7, 2006. Retrieved 2008-08-14. 
  16. ^ Stein R (September 8, 2006). "Vegetative patient's brain active in test: Unprecedented experiment shows response to instructions to imagine playing tennis". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2007-09-26. 
  17. ^ Willful Modulation of Brain Activity in Disorders of Consciousness at
  18. ^ a b c d Richard Alleyne and Martin Beckford, Patients in 'vegetative' state can think and communicate,Telegraph (United Kingdom), Feb 4, 2010
  19. ^ Damian Cruse et al: Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study, The Lancet, Early Online Publication, 10 November 2011, DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61224-5 (abstract)
  20. ^ Dolce, Giuliano; Sazbon, Leon (2002). The post-traumatic vegetative state. 
  21. ^ "The Waking Pill". 'ONE Life, BBC 1 TV. 2007-10-31. Retrieved on 2010-01-03.
  22. ^ Clauss RP, Güldenpfennig WM, Nel HW, Sathekge MM, Venkannagari RR (2000). "Extraordinary arousal from semi-comatose state on zolpidem: A case report". South African Medical Journal 90 (1): 68–72. PMID 10721397. 
  23. ^ a b Pidd, Helen (2006-09-12). "Reborn". The Guardian.,,1870279,00.html. 
  24. ^ Simpson, Aislinn (2007-10-31). "Sleeping pill Zolpidem awakens girl from coma". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 2007-11-01. [dead link]
  25. ^ Clauss, R; Nel, W (2006). "Drug induced arousal from the permanent vegetative state". Neuro Rehabilitation 21 (1): 23–28. PMID 16720934. 
  26. ^ Snyman, N; et al., JR; London, K; Howman-Giles, R; Gill, D; Gillis, J; Scheinberg, A (2010). "Zolpidem for persistent vegetative state--a placebo-controlled trial in pediatrics". Neuropediatrics 41 (5): 223–227. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1269893. PMID 21210338. 
  27. ^ Whyte, J; Myers, R (2009). "Incidence of clinically significant responses to zolpidem among patients with disorders of consciousness: a preliminary placebo controlled trial". Am J Phys Med Rehab 88 (5): 410–418. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181a0e3a0. PMID 19620954. 
  28. ^ Ford GP and Reardon DC (August 2006). "Prolonged unintended brain cooling may inhibit recovery from brain injuries: case study and literature review". Med Sci Monit. 12 (8): CS74–79. 
  29. ^ Hirsch, Joy (2005-05-02). "Raising consciousness". The Journal of clinical investigation (American Society for Clinical Investigation) 115 (5): 1102. doi:10.1172/JCI25320. PMC 1087197. PMID 15864333. 
  30. ^ Appel on Betancourt v. Trinitas

Canavero S, Massa-Micon B, Cauda F, Montanaro E.Bifocal extradural cortical stimulation-induced recovery of consciousness in the permanent post-traumatic vegetative state.J Neurol. 2009 May;256(5):834-6.

Canavero S. Textbook of therapeutic cortical stimulation. New York: Nova Science, 2009


This article contains text from the NINDS public domain pages on TBI. [1] and [2].

  • Borthwick C (1996) The permanent vegetative state: ethical crux, medical fiction? Issues Law Med. 1996 Fall;12(2):167-85. The author questions the validity of most PVS diagnoses, and the validity of the basic nosology. The fulltext is available on the author's website.
  • Laureys, Steven (2000). "The neural correlate of (un)awareness: lessons from the vegetative state". Cyclotron Research Center and Department of Neurology B30. 
  • Matsuda, W.; Matsumura, A.; Komatsu, Y.; Yanaka, K.; Nose, T (2003). "Awakenings from persistent vegetative state: report of three cases with Parkinsonism and brain stem lesions on MRI". Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 74 (11): 1571–3. doi:10.1136/jnnp.74.11.1571. PMC 1738238. PMID 14617720. 
  • Owen, A.M.; Menon, D.K.; Johnsrude, I.S.; Bor, D.; Scott, SK; Manly, T; Williams, EJ; Mummery, C et al. (2002). "Detecting residual cognitive function in persistent vegetative state". Neurocase 8 (5): 394–403. doi:10.1076/neur.8.4.394.16184. PMID 12499414. 
  • Boly, M.; Faymonville, ME; Peigneux, P; Lambermont, B; Damas, P; Del Fiore, G; Degueldre, C; Franck, G et al. (2004). "Auditory Processing in Severely Brain Injured Patients". Arch Neurol 61 (2): 233–238. doi:10.1001/archneur.61.2.233. PMID 14967772. 
  • Emmett, P. A. (1989). A Biblico-Ethical Response to the Question of Withdrawing Fluid and Nutrition from Individuals in the Persistent Vegetative State. 4-5. pp. 248–249. 
  • Ashwal, S. (1994). "Medical Aspects of the Persistent Vegetative State— Second of Two Parts". N Engl J Med 330 (22): 1572–1579. doi:10.1056/NEJM199406023302206. PMID 8177248. 
  • Owen, A.M.; Coleman, M.R.; Johnsrude, I.S.; Menon, D.K.; Rodd, JM; Davis, MH; Taylor, K; Pickard, JD (2005). "Residual auditory function in persistent vegetative state: A combined PET and fMRI study". Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 15 (3–4): 290–306. doi:10.1080/09602010443000579. PMID 16350973. 
  • Laureys, S.; Faymonville, M.E.; Peigneux, P.; Menon, D.K.; Lambermont, B; Del Fiore, G; Degueldre, C; Aerts, J et al. (2002). "Cortical processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in the persistent vegetative state". Neuroimage 17 (2): 732–741. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(02)91236-X. PMID 12377148. 
  • Sara, M.; Sacco, S.; Cipolla, F.; Onorati, P.; Scoppetta, C; Albertini, G; Carolei, A (2007). "An unexpected recovery from permanent vegetative state". Brain Injury 21 (1): 101–103. doi:10.1080/02699050601151761. PMID 17364525. 
  • Schiff, N.D.; Ribary, U.; Moreno, D.R.; Beattie, B.; Kronberg, E; Blasberg, R; Giacino, J; McCagg, C et al. (2002). "Residual cerebral activity and behavioural fragments can remain in the persistently vegetative brain". Brain 125 (Pt 6): 1210–1234. doi:10.1093/brain/awf131. PMID 12023311. 
  • <Please add first missing authors to populate metadata.> (1996). "Diagnosis and management: Report of a working party of the Royal College of Physicians". Royal College of Physicians. 
  • Canavero S et al. (2009). "Recovery of consciousness following bifocal extradural cortical stimulation in a permanently vegetative patient". Journal of Neurology 256 (5): 834–6. doi:10.1007/s00415-009-5019-4. PMID 19252808. 
  • Canavero S (editor) (2009). Textbook of therapeutic cortical stimulation. New York: Nova Science. 

Further reading

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • persistent vegetative state — noun (medicine) An irreversible condition induced by lack of oxygen, in which the sufferer is still alive, but is incapable of any thought processes and any voluntary physical action (abbrev PVS) • • • Main Entry: ↑persist * * * noun [singular]… …   Useful english dictionary

  • persistent vegetative state — persistent vegetative states N COUNT If someone is in a persistent vegetative state, they are unable to think, speak, or move because they have severe brain damage, and their condition is not likely to improve. [MEDICAL] …   English dictionary

  • persistent vegetative state — (PVS) the condition of living like a vegetable, without consciousness or the ability to initiate voluntary action, as a result of brain damage. People in the vegetative state may sometimes give the appearance of being awake and conscious, with… …   Medical dictionary

  • persistent vegetative state — PVS the condition of living without consciousness or the ability to initiate voluntary action, as a result of brain damage. People in the vegetative state may sometimes give the appearance of being awake and conscious, with open eyes. They may… …   The new mediacal dictionary

  • persistent vegetative state — (PVS) the presence of a vegetative state one month after acute brain damage …   Medical dictionary

  • persistent vegetative state — per.sistent vegetative .state n medical a condition in which someone s brain is so damaged that they cannot move or talk, and their condition is unlikely to improve …   Dictionary of contemporary English

  • persistent vegetative state — per,sistent ,vegetative state noun singular MEDICAL a condition in which a person shows no sign of any brain activity, for example following a serious injury, and is kept alive only by the use of medical machines …   Usage of the words and phrases in modern English

  • persistent vegetative state — noun A condition of patients with severe brain damage in whom coma has progressed to a state of wakefulness without awareness …   Wiktionary

  • persistent vegetative state — noun a condition in which a patient is completely unresponsive to stimuli and displays no sign of higher brain function, being kept alive only by medical intervention …   English new terms dictionary

  • persistent vegetative state — UK / US noun [singular] medical a condition in which a person shows no sign of any brain activity, for example following a serious injury, and is kept alive only by the use of medical machines …   English dictionary

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”