Seat belt

This article is about the safety device. For the band, see The Seatbelts.

A 3-point seat belt.

Lives saved by seat belts and airbags in the United States

A seat belt or seatbelt, sometimes called a safety belt, is a safety harness designed to secure the occupant of a vehicle against harmful movement that may result from a collision or a sudden stop. A seat belt reduces the likelihood and severity of injury in a traffic collision by stopping the vehicle occupant from hitting hard interior elements of the vehicle or other passengers (the so-called second impact), by keeping occupants positioned correctly for maximum benefit from the airbag, if the vehicle is so equipped, and by preventing occupants being ejected from the vehicle. The seat belt is designed to stretch at a controlled rate to absorb crash energy and reduce the severity of the occupant's deceleration.

History

Seat belts were invented by George Cayley in the early 19th century,^[1] though Edward J. Claghorn of New York, was granted the first patent (U.S. Patent 312,085, on February 10, 1885 for a safety belt).^[2] Claghorn was granted United States Patent #312,085 for a Safety-Belt for tourists, painters, fireman, etc. who are being raised or lowered, described in the patent as "designed to be applied to the person, and provided with hooks and other attachments for securing the person to a fixed object."

In 1911, Benjamin Foulois had the cavalry saddle shop fashion a belt for the seat of Wright Flyer Signal Corps 1. He wanted it to hold him firmly in his seat so he could better control his aircraft as he bounded along the rough field used for takeoff and landing. C-130 aircraft in South Vietnam also bounded on runways to the extent that a tight seat belt improved the pilot's ability to control the aircraft. It was not until World War II that seat belts were fully adopted in military aircraft, and even then, it was mainly for safety reasons, not improved aircraft control.^{[citation needed]}

In 1946 Dr. C. Hunter Shelden had opened a neurological practice at Huntington Memorial Hospital in Pasadena, California. In the early 1950s Dr. Shelden had made a major contribution to the automotive industry with his idea of retractable seat belts. This came about greatly in part from the high number of head injuries coming through the emergency rooms.^[3] He investigated the early seat belts whose primitive designs were implicated in these injuries and deaths. His findings were published in the November 5, 1955 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in which he proposed not only the retractable seat belt, but also recessed steering wheels, reinforced roofs, roll bars, door locks and passive restraints such as the now-and-ever-popular air bag. Subsequently in 1959 Congress passed legislation requiring all automobiles to comply with certain safety standards.^[4]

American car manufacturers Nash (in 1949) and Ford (in 1955) offered seat belts as options, while Swedish Saab first introduced seat belts as standard in 1958.^[5] After the Saab GT 750 was introduced at the New York motor show in 1958 with safety belts fitted as standard, the practice became commonplace.^[6]

Glenn Sheren of Mason, Michigan submitted a patent application on March 31, 1955 for an automotive seat belt and was awarded US Patent 2,855,215 in 1958. This was a continuation of an earlier patent application that Mr. Sheren had filed on September 22, 1952.^[7]

However, the first modern three point seat belt (the so-called CIR-Griswold restraint) used in most consumer vehicles today was patented in 1955 (US Patent 2,710,649) by the Americans Roger W. Griswold and Hugh DeHaven,^[8] and developed to its modern form by Nils Bohlin for Swedish manufacturer Volvo—who introduced it in 1959 as standard equipment. Bohlin was granted U.S. Patent 3,043,625 for the device.^[5] Bohlin's lap-and-shoulder belt was introduced by Volvo in 1959, in Sweden.

The world's first seat belt law was put in place in 1970, in the state of Victoria, Australia, making the wearing of a seat belt compulsory for drivers and front-seat passengers.^[9]

Types

Two-point

A 2-point belt attaches at its two endpoints.

Lap

A lap ("2-point") belt in an airplane

A lap belt is a strap that goes over the waist. This was the most commonly installed type of belt prior to legislation requiring 3-point belts, and is primarily found in older cars. Some coaches are equipped with lap belts, as are passenger aircraft seats.

Sash

A "sash" or shoulder harness is a strap that goes diagonally over the vehicle occupant's outboard shoulder and is buckled inboard of his or her lap. The shoulder harness may attach to the lap belt tongue, or it may have a tongue and buckle completely separate from those of the lap belt. Shoulder harnesses of this separate or semi-separate type were installed in conjunction with lap belts in the outboard front seating positions of many vehicles in the North American market starting at the inception of the shoulder belt requirement of the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208 on 1 January 1968. However, if the shoulder strap is used without the lap belt, the vehicle occupant is likely to "submarine", or slide forward in the seat and out from under the belt, in a frontal collision. In the mid-1970s, 3-point belt systems such as Chrysler's "Uni-Belt" began to supplant the separate lap and shoulder belts in American-made cars, though such 3-point belts had already been supplied in European vehicles such as Volvos, Mercedes, and Saabs for some years.

Three-point

A 3-point seat belt

A 3-point belt is a Y-shaped arrangement, similar to the separate lap and sash belts, but unitized. Like the separate lap-and-sash belt, in a collision the 3-point belt spreads out the energy of the moving body over the chest, pelvis, and shoulders. Volvo introduced the first production three-point belt in 1959.^[10] The first car with three point belt was a Volvo PV 544 that was delivered to a dealer in Kristianstad on August 13, 1959. However, the first car model to feature the three point seat belt as a standard item was the 1959 Volvo 122, first outfitted with a two-point belt at initial delivery in 1958, replaced with the three point seat belt the following year.^[11] The three point belt was developed by Nils Bohlin who had earlier also worked on ejection seats at Saab.^[12]

Until the 1980s, three-point belts were commonly available only in the front outboard seats of cars; the back seats were only often fitted with lap belts. Evidence of the potential of lap belts to cause separation of the lumbar vertebrae and the sometimes associated paralysis, or "seat belt syndrome", led to progressive revision of passenger safety regulations in nearly all developed countries to require 3-point belts first in all outboard seating positions and eventually in all seating positions in passenger vehicles. Since September 1, 2007, all new cars sold in the U.S. require a lap and shoulder belt in the center rear seat.^[13]

Besides regulatory changes, "seat belt syndrome" has led to tremendous liability for vehicle manufacturers. One Los Angeles case resulted in a $45 million jury verdict against the Ford Motor Company; the resulting $30 million judgment (after deductions for another defendant who settled prior to trial) was affirmed on appeal in 2006.^[14]

Belt-in-Seat (BIS)

The BIS is a three-point harness with the shoulder belt attached to the seat itself, rather than to the vehicle structure.^[15] The first car using this system in the United States was the 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL.^[16] Some cars like the Renault Vel Satis use this system for the front seats. A General Motors assessment concluded seat-mounted 3-point belts offer better protection especially to smaller vehicle occupants,^[17] though GM did not find a safety performance improvement in vehicles with seat-mounted belts versus body-mounted belts.^[18]

4-, 5-, and 6-point

A 6-point harness in a racing car.

Five-point harnesses are typically found in child safety seats and in racing cars. The lap portion is connected to a belt between the legs and there are two shoulder belts, making a total of five points of attachment to the seat. A 4-point harness is similar, but without the strap between the legs, while a 6-point harness has two belts between the legs. Such harnesses can cause paralysis or other severe injury in a collision^[19][18] and are used mainly in racing. In NASCAR, the 6-point harness became popular after the death of Dale Earnhardt, who was wearing a five-point harness when he suffered his fatal crash. As it was first thought that his belt had broken, some teams ordered a six-point harness in response.^{[citation needed]}

Seven-point

Aerobatic aircraft frequently use a combination harness consisting of a five-point harness with a redundant lap-belt attached to a different part of the airframe. While providing redundancy for negative-g maneuvers (which lift the pilot out of the seat), they also require the pilot to un-latch two harnesses if it is necessary to parachute from a failed aircraft.

Technology

Seat Belt with uncovered Inertial Reel

Locking retractors

Most modern seat belts are stowed on spring-loaded reels called retractors equipped with inertial locking mechanisms that stop the belt from extending off the reel during severe deceleration. There are two main types of inertial seat belt lock. A webbing-sensitive lock is based on a centrifugal clutch activated by rapid acceleration of the strap (webbing) from the reel. The belt can be pulled from the reel only slowly and gradually, as when the occupant extends the belt to fasten it. A sudden rapid pull of the belt — as in a sudden braking or collision event — causes the reel to lock, restraining the occupant in position. A vehicle-sensitive lock is based on a pendulum swung away from its plumb position by rapid deceleration or rollover of the vehicle. In the absence of rapid deceleration or rollover, the reel is unlocked and the belt strap may be pulled from the reel against the spring tension of the reel. The vehicle occupant can move around with relative freedom while the spring tension of the reel keeps the belt taut against the occupant. When the pendulum swings away from its normal plumb position due to sudden deceleration or rollover, a pawl is engaged, the reel locks and the strap restrains the belted occupant in position.

Some belts incorporate both vehicle- and webbing-sensitive inertial locks.

A recent study by McCoy & Chou (2007) from the Ford Motor Company (Safety Test Methodology, SP-2123) demonstrated that the standard inertia reel seatbelt^[which?] does not stop the head from making contact with the interior of the roof on a standard rollover test in their dynamic Rollover Component test System (ROCS). Even with modern pre-tensioning devices the head contacts the interior of the roof and the neck suffers 'visible' compression.^{[citation needed]}

Pretensioners and webclamps

Pyrotechnic pretensioner diagram

Seatbelts in many newer vehicles are also equipped with "pretensioners" and/or "Webclamps".

• Pretensioners preemptively tighten the belt to prevent the occupant from jerking forward in a crash. Mercedes-Benz first introduced pretensioners on the 1981 S-Class. In the event of a crash, a pretensioner will tighten the belt almost instantaneously. This reduces the motion of the occupant in a violent crash. Like airbags, pretensioners are triggered by sensors in the car's body, and most pretensioners use explosively expanding gas to drive a piston that retracts the belt. Pretensioners also lower the risk of "submarining", which is when a passenger slides forward under a loosely worn seat belt. An alternative approach being looked at by major car companies is the CG-Lock technology whereby the occupant is held in position via the lap belt in order to prevent the passenger from coming out of position in the event of a crash. Some systems also pre-emptively tighten the belt in fast accelerations and strong decelerations even if no crash has happened.
• Webclamps clamp the webbing in the event of an accident and limit the distance the webbing can spool out (caused by the unused webbing tightening on the central drum of the mechanism) these belts also often incorporate an energy management loop ("rip stitching") which is when the lower part of the webbing is looped and stitched with a special stitching. The function of this is to "rip" at a predetermined load, which reduces the load transmitted through the belt to the occupant, reducing injuries to the occupant.

Inflatable

Inflatable seatbelts have tubular inflatable bladders contained within an outer cover. When a crash occurs the bladder inflates with a gas to increase the area of the restraint contacting the occupant and also shortening the length of the restraint to tighten the belt around the occupant, improving the protection.^[20] The inflatable sections may be shoulder-only or lap and shoulder. The system supports the head during the crash better than a web only belt. It also provides side impact protection. The inflatable seatbelt was invented by Donald Lewis and tested at the Automotive Products Division of Allied Chemical Corp. Ref an early patent US 3,841,654 filed in 1972

Automatic

Automatic seat belt in a Honda Civic

Seatbelts that automatically move into position around a vehicle occupant once the adjacent door is closed and/or the engine is started were developed as a countermeasure against low usage rates of manual seat belts, particularly in the United States. The first car to feature Automatic Shoulder belts as standard equipment was the 1981 Toyota Cressida, but the history of the belts go back further.^[21]

The 1972 Volkswagen ESVW1 Experimental Safety Vehicle presented passive seat belts.^[22] Volvo tried to develop a passive three point seatbelt. In 1973 Volkswagen announced they had a functional passive seat belt.^[23] The first commercial car to use automatic seat belts was the 1975 Volkswagen Rabbit.^[24]

Automatic seat belts received a boost in the United States in 1977 when Brock Adams, United States Secretary of Transportation in the Carter Administration, mandated that by 1983 every new car should have either airbags or automatic seat belts^[25][26] despite strong lobbying from the auto industry.^[27] Adams was attacked by Ralph Nader, who said that the 1983 deadline was too late.^[28] Soon after, General Motors began offering automatic seat belts, first on the Chevrolet Chevette,^[29][30] but by early 1979 the VW Rabbit and the Chevette were the only cars to offer the safety feature,^[28] and GM was reporting disappointing sales.^[31] By early 1978, Volkswagen had reported 90,000 Rabbits sold with automatic seat belts.^[24] A study released in 1978 by the United States Department of Transportation claimed that cars with automatic seat belts had a fatality rate of .78 per 100 million miles, compared with 2.34 for cars with regular, manual belts.^[32] In 1981, Drew Lewis, the first Transportation Secretary of the Reagan Administration, influenced by studies done by the auto industry,^[33] "killed"^[34] the previous administration's mandate;^[35] the decision was overruled in a federal appeals court the following year,^[36] and then by the Supreme Court.^[34] In 1984, the Reagan Administration reversed its course,^[37] though in the meantime the original deadline had been extended; Elizabeth Dole, then Transportation Secretary, proposed that the two passive safety restraints be phased into vehicles gradually, from vehicle model year 1987 to vehicle model year 1990, when all vehicles would be required to have either automatic seat belts or driver side air bags.^[34] Though more awkward for vehicle occupants, most manufacturers opted to use less expensive automatic belts rather than airbags during this time period.

When driver side airbags became mandatory on all passenger vehicles in model year 1994, most manufacturers stopped equipping cars with automatic seat belts. Exceptions include the 1995-1996 Ford Escort/Mercury Tracer and the Eagle Summit Wagon which had automatic safety belts along with dual airbags.^{[citation needed]}

Systems

• Manual lap belt with automatic motorized shoulder belt — When the door is opened, the shoulder belt moves from a fixed point near the seat back on a track mounted in the door frame of the car to a point at the other end of the track near the windshield. Once the door is closed and the car is started, the belt moves rearward along the track to its original position, thus securing the passenger. The lap belt must be fastened manually.

• Manual lap belt with automatic non-motorized shoulder belt — This system was used in American-market vehicles such as the Hyundai Excel and Volkswagen Jetta. The shoulder belt is fixed to the aft upper corner of the vehicle door, and is not motorized. The lap belt must be fastened manually.

• Automatic shoulder and lap belts — This system was mainly used in General Motors vehicles, though it was also used on some Honda Civic hatchbacks and Nissan Sentra coupés. When the door is opened, the belts go from a fixed point in the middle of the car by the floor to retractors on the door. Passengers must slide into the car under the belts. When the door closes, the seat belt retracts into the door. The belts have normal release buttons that are supposed to be used only in an emergency, but in practice are routinely used in the same manner as manual seat belt clasps.^{[citation needed]}

Disadvantages

Automatic belt systems generally offer inferior occupant crash protection.^[38][39] In systems with belts attached to the door rather than a sturdier fixed portion of the vehicle body, a crash that causes the vehicle door to open leaves the occupant without belt protection. He or she will in that case be thrown from the vehicle and suffer greater injury or death.^[39] Because many automatic belt system designs compliant with the US passive-restraint mandate did not meet the safety performance requirements of Canada—which were not weakened to accommodate automatic belts—vehicle models which had been eligible for easy importation in either direction across the US-Canada border when equipped with manual belts became ineligible for importation in either direction once the US variants got automatic belts and the Canadian versions retained manual belts. Two such models were the Dodge Spirit and Plymouth Acclaim.^[40][41]

Automatic belt systems also present several operational disadvantages. Motorists who would normally wear seat belts must still fasten the manual lap belt, thus rendering redundant the automation of the shoulder belt. Those who do not fasten the lap belt wind up inadequately protected by only the shoulder belt; in a crash without a lap belt such a vehicle occupant is likely to "submarine" (be thrown forward under the shoulder belt) and be seriously injured. Motorized or door-affixed shoulder belts hinder access to the vehicle, making it difficult to enter and exit—particularly if the occupant is carrying items such as a box or a purse. Vehicle owners tend to disconnect the motorized or door-affixed shoulder belt to alleviate the nuisance of entering and exiting the vehicle, leaving only a lap belt for crash protection. Also, many automatic seat belt systems are incompatible with child safety seats, or compatible only with special modifications.

Experimental

Research and development efforts are ongoing to improve the safety performance of vehicle seatbelts. Some experimental designs have included:

• Criss-cross Experimental safety belt presented in the Volvo SCC. It forms a cross-brace across the chest.^[18]
• 3+2 Point Seatbelt: Experimental safety belt from Autoliv similar to the criss-cross. The 3+2 improves protection against rollovers and side impacts.^[42]
• Four point "belt and suspenders": An experimental design from Ford where the "suspenders" are attached to the backrest, not to the frame of the car.^[43]

In rear seats

In 1955 (as a 1956 package) Ford offered lap only seat belts in the rear seats as an option within the Lifeguard safety package. In 1967 Volvo started to install lap belts in the rear seats. In 1972 Volvo upgraded the rear seat belts to a three point belt.^[44]

In crashes, unbelted rear passengers increase the risk of belted front seat occupants' death by nearly five times.^[45][46]

Child occupants

Main article: Infant car seat

As with adult drivers and passengers, the advent of seat belts was accompanied by calls for their use by child occupants, including legislation requiring such use. Generally children using adult seat belts suffer significantly lower injury risk when compared to non-buckled children.

The UK extended compulsory seatbelt wearing to child passengers under the age of 14 in 1989. It was observed that this measure was accompanied by a 10% increase in fatalities and a 12% increase in injuries among the target population.^[47] In crashes, small children who wear adult seatbelts can suffer "seat-belt syndrome" injuries including severed intestines, ruptured diaphragms and spinal damage. There is also research suggesting that children in inappropriate restraints are at significantly increased risk of head injury,^[48] one of the authors of this research has been quoted as claiming that "The early graduation of kids into adult lap and shoulder belts is a leading cause of child-occupant injuries and deaths."^[49] As a result of such findings, many jurisdictions now advocate or require child passengers to use specially designed child restraints. Such systems include separate child-sized seats with their own restraints and booster cushions for children using adult restraints. In some jurisdictions children below a certain size are forbidden to travel in front car seats."^[50]

Reminder chime and light

Examples of warning lights on a car dashboard.

In North America, cars sold since the early 1970s have included an audiovisual reminder system consisting of a light on the dashboard and a buzzer or chime reminding the driver and passengers to fasten their belts. Originally, these lights were accompanied by a warning buzzer whenever the transmission was in any position except park if either the driver was not buckled up or, as determined by a pressure sensor in the passenger's seat, if there was a passenger there not buckled up. However, this was considered by many to be a major annoyance, as the light would be on and the buzzer would sound continuously if front-seat passengers were not buckled up. Therefore, people who did not wish to buckle up would defeat this system by fastening the seatbelts with the seat empty and leaving them that way.

By the mid-1970s, auto manufacturers modified the system so that a warning buzzer would sound for several seconds before turning off (with the warning light), regardless of whether the car was started. However, if the driver was buckled up, the light would appear, but with no buzzer. New cars sold in the United States in 1974 and the first part of the 1975 model year were sold with a special "ignition interlock", whereby the driver could not start the car until the seat belt was fastened; however, this system was short-lived.

Today, the belt warning light may stay on for several minutes after the car is started if the driver's seat belt is not fastened.

In Europe and some other parts of the world, most modern cars include a seat-belt reminder light for the driver and some also include a reminder for the passenger, when present, activated by a pressure sensor under the passenger seat. Some cars will intermittently flash the reminder light and sound the chime until the driver (and sometimes the front passenger, if present) fasten their seatbelts.

Legislation

Main article: Seat belt legislation

Observational studies of car crash morbidity and mortality,^[51][52][53] experiments using both crash test dummies and human cadavers indicate that wearing seat belts greatly reduces the risk of death and injury in the majority of car crashes.

This has led many countries to adopt mandatory seat belt wearing laws. It is generally accepted that, in comparing like-for-like accidents, a vehicle occupant not wearing a properly fitted seat belt has a significantly and substantially higher chance of death and serious injury. One large observation studying using US data showed that the odds ratio of crash death is 0.46 with a three-point belt, when compared with no belt.^[54] In another study that examined injuries presenting to the ER pre- and post-seat belt law introduction, it was found that 40% more escaped injury and 35% more escaped mild and moderate injuries.^[55]

The effects of seat belt laws are disputed by those who observe that their passage did not reduce road fatalities. There was also concern that instead of legislating for a general protection standard for vehicle occupants, laws that required a particular technical approach would rapidly become dated as motor manufacturers would tool up for a particular standard which could not easily be changed. For example, in 1969 there were competing designs for lap and 3-point seat belts, rapidly-tilting seats, and air bags being developed. But as countries started to mandate seat belt restraints the global auto industry invested in the tooling and standardized exclusively on seat belts, and ignored other restraint designs such as air bags for several decades^[56]

Risk compensation

Some have proposed that the number of deaths was influenced by the development of risk compensation, which says that drivers adjust their behavior in response to the increased sense of personal safety wearing a seat belt provides.

In one trial subjects were asked to drive go-karts around a track under various conditions. It was found that subjects who started driving unbelted drove consistently faster when subsequently belted.^[57] Similarly, a study of habitual non-seatbelt wearers driving in freeway conditions found evidence that they had adapted to seatbelt use by adopting higher driving speeds and closer following distances.^[58] Similar responses have been shown in respect of anti-lock braking system, airbags, and, more recently, the electronic stability control system.^{[citation needed]}

A 2001 analysis of US crash data aimed to establish the effects of seatbelt legislation on driving fatalities^[59] and found that previous estimates of seatbelts effectiveness had been significantly overstated. According to the analysis used, seatbelts were claimed to have decreased fatalities by 1.35% for each 10% increase in seatbelt use. The study controlled for endogenous motivations of seat belt use, which it is claimed creates an artificial correlation between seat belt use and fatalities, leading to the conclusion that seatbelts cause fatalities. For example, drivers in high risk areas are more likely to use seat belts, and are more likely to be in accidents, creating a non-causal correlation between seatbelt use and mortality. After accounting for the endogeneity of seatbelt usage, Cohen and Einav found no evidence that the risk compensation effect makes seatbelt wearing drivers more dangerous, a finding at variance with other research.

Increased traffic

Other statistical analyses have included adjustments for factors such as increased traffic, and other factors such as age, and based on these adjustments, a reduction of morbidity and mortality due to seat belt use has been claimed.^[51] However, Smeed's law predicts a fall in accident rate with increasing car ownership and has been demonstrated independently of seat belt legislation.

In non-car vehicles

Buses

School buses

Further information: Seat belts in school buses

Pros^[60][61] and cons^{[62][63][64][65]} had been alleged about the use of seatbelts in school buses.

Motor coaches

In the European Union, all new long distance buses and coaches must be fitted with seat belts.^[66]

Trains

Use of seatbelts in trains has been investigated. Concerns about survival space intrusion in train crashes and increase of injuries to unrestrained or incorrectly restrained passengers led the researches to discourage the use of seat belts in trains.

It has been shown that there is no net safety benefit for passengers who choose to wear 3-point restraints on passenger carrying rail vehicles. Generally passengers who choose not to wear restraints in a vehicle modified to accept 3-point restraints receive marginally more severe injuries.^[67]

Airplanes

The "Father of Crash Survivability", Hugh DeHaven, was a plane pilot. His interest in crash survivability was sparked by his surviving a plane crash during the First World War.

See also

• Air bags
• Automobile safety
• Baby transport
• Passive safety device
• Seat belt use rates by country
• Seat belt use rates in the USA

References

1. ^ Manby, Frederic (24 August 2009). "Clunk, click – an invention that's saved lives for 50 years". Yorkshire Post (Johnston Press Digital Publishing). http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/features/Clunk-click--an-invention.5583475.jp?articlepage=1. Retrieved 2010-12-04. 
2. ^ Andréasson, Rune; Claes-Göran Bäckström (2000.). The Seat Belt : Swedish Research and Development for Global Automotive Safety. Stockholm: Kulturvårdskommittén Vattenfall AB. p. 12. ISBN 91-630-9389-8. 
3. ^ "HMRI News". Hmri.org. http://www.hmri.org/HMRI_News/HMRI_News_-_May_2003/Shelden_Memorial/shelden_memorial.html. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
4. ^ C. Hunter Shelden, M.D., (November 5, 1955). "Prevention, the only cure for heat injuries resulting from automobile accidents". Journal of the American Medical Association. doi:10.1001/jama.1955.029602700. 
5. ^ ^{a b} "The man who saved a million lives: Nils Bohlin - inventor of the seat belt - Features, Gadgets & Tech". The Independent. 2009-08-19. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/the-man-who-saved-a-million-lives-nils-bohlin--inventor-of-the-seatbelt-1773844.html. Retrieved 2009-12-08. 
6. ^ "Trollhattan Saab — Saab 9-1, 9-3, 9-4x, 9-5, 9-7x News". Trollhattansaab.net. http://www.trollhattansaab.net/page/5. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
7. ^ "Automobile safety belt system - Patent 2855215". Freepatentsonline.com. 1958-10-07. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/2855215.html. Retrieved 2011-04-03. 
8. ^ Andréasson, Rune; Claes-Göran Bäckström (2000.). The Seat Belt : Swedish Research and Development for Global Automotive Safety. Stockholm: Kulturvårdskommittén Vattenfall AB. pp. 15–16. ISBN 91-630-9389-8. 
9. ^ "A Potted Seat Belt History". Drivers Technology. http://www.driverstechnology.co.uk/seatbelts.htm. 
10. ^ "Volvo Cars airbag celebrates 20 years". Volvoclub.org.uk. 2007-05-26. http://www.volvoclub.org.uk/press/releases/2007/20_years_air_bags.shtml. Retrieved 2009-08-29. 
11. ^ Lindh, Björn Erik (1986). "The Amazon/120 - Beauty with Brown". Volvo The Cars from the 20s to the 80s. Förlagshuset Norden AB, Malmö. pp. 134. ISBN 91-86442-14-7. "p134: "The 1959 model (which appeared in August 1958) featured a major innovation in the form of front seat safety belts as standard equipment on all the cars, including the export models. Volvo was the world's first automaker to take this step, even though Ford fitted a "lap" belt on one or other of its cars in the middle of the 50s."" 
12. ^ "Allt om Motor: Trepunktsbältet 50 år". Alltommotor.se. http://www.alltommotor.se/artiklar/nyheter/trepunktsbaltet-50-ar-1.14639. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
13. ^ "Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Occupant Crash Protection. Final Rule". Nhtsa.dot.gov. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/rules/rulings/Anton_FRNov16.html. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
14. ^ Karlsson v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Cal. App. 4th 1202 (2006).
15. ^ Autoliv Inc - What we do - Seatbelts^{[dead link]}
16. ^ Lankard, Tom. "''The first seat offered in the U.S. that incorporated a three-point belt—on the 1990 Mercedes-Benz SL—''". Editorial.autos.msn.com. http://editorial.autos.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=434695. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
17. ^ "Up Close: Seatbelt safety in question"— KHOU News, 20 June 2003
18. ^ ^{a b c} [http://editorial.autos.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=434695 "In Search of the Perfect Seat Belt"]—MSN
19. ^ Five-Point Belts Will Paralyze You and Other Fun Safety Facts
20. ^ Silke, Sharon (2009-11-06). "Ford says inflatable seat belt improves safety, comfort, too". Usatoday.com. http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2009-11-05-ford-inflatable-seat-belts_N.htm. Retrieved 2011-04-03. 
21. ^ http://toyota50th.com/history.htm
22. ^ "Experimental Safety Vehicle". Classicvw.org. http://www.classicvw.org/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.ShowItem&g2_itemId=5498. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
23. ^ "SAFETY SELLS: Chapter 3" (PDF). http://safetysells.org/chapter3.pdf. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
24. ^ ^{a b} "Passive-Belt Activity". The New York Times. 1978-03-26. 
25. ^ "Airbags, seat belts to be mandatory in every car by 1983". Daily Collegian. 1977-07-01. http://digitalnewspapers.libraries.psu.edu/Default/Skins/BasicArch/Client.asp?Skin=BasicArch&&AppName=2&enter=true&BaseHref=DCG/1977/07/01&EntityId=Ar00800. Retrieved 2009-12-03. 
26. ^ "Air Bags, Automatic Seat Belts". Los Angeles Times. 1977-10-04. 
27. ^ Stevens, William K. (1977-07-01). "Auto Industry Expresses Reluctance, Resignation Over Air Bag Mandate". New York Times: p. 18. http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0A1FF9355D167493C3A9178CD85F438785F9. Retrieved 2009-12-03. 
28. ^ ^{a b} Hair, Marty (1979-02-23). "Crusade Continues, But The Intensity Has Mellowed". Boca Raton News: p. 8C. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=Kc0PAAAAIBAJ&sjid=N40DAAAAIBAJ&pg=6914,4536924&dq=automatic-seat-belts&hl=en. Retrieved 2009-12-03. 
29. ^ "GM Offers Automatic Seat Belts". Chicago Tribune: p. 8. 1978-06-27. 
30. ^ "GM's Automatic Seat Belts Go on Chevettes". Los Angeles Times. 1978-06-27. 
31. ^ "Sales of Automatic Seat Belts Disappointing, Chevrolet Says". Toledo Blade: p. 1. 1979-02-23. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=vAoVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=hwIEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5703,3431567&dq=automatic-seat-belts&hl=en. Retrieved 2009-12-03. 
32. ^ Girard, Penny (1978-08-31). "Study Finds Automatic Seat Belts, Airbags Save Lives". St. Petersburg Times: p. 1. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=vAoVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=hwIEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5703,3431567&dq=automatic-seat-belts&hl=en. Retrieved 2009-12-03. 
33. ^ Brody, Jane E. (1981-12-09). "Personal Health". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1981/12/09/garden/personal-health-124390.html?&pagewanted=all. Retrieved 2009-12-03. 
34. ^ ^{a b c} "Middle Lane: Bags, Belts, and a Loophole". TIME. 1984-07-23. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,952435,00.html#ixzz0YgSxo3UC. Retrieved 2009-12-03. 
35. ^ "Automatic seat belt, airbag rules dropped". Chicago Tribune: p. 1. 1981-10-24. 
36. ^ "Automatic seat belts ordered". Spokane Chronicle: p. 28. 1982-08-04. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=n8USAAAAIBAJ&sjid=ZPkDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5783,760646&dq=automatic-seat-belts&hl=en. Retrieved 2009-12-03. 
37. ^ "US to require airbags or automatic seat belts". Chicago Tribune: p. 1. 1984-07-11. 
38. ^ "Chrysler Doubts Air-Bag Claims". The Montreal Gazette. 1977-09-30. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=apAjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=bKEFAAAAIBAJ&pg=896,3611827&hl=en. Retrieved 2010-09-25. 
39. ^ ^{a b} Abeles, Ethan (1998). "The Ability of Automakers to Introduce a Costly, Regulated New Technology: A Case Study of Automotive Airbags in the U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle Market". Master's Thesis. http://pubs.its.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=175. Retrieved 2010-09-25. 
40. ^ "Canadian vehicle importation regulations". Riv.ca. http://www.riv.ca/english/html/how_to_import.html. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
41. ^ "US vehicle importation regulations". Nhtsa.dot.gov. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/rules/import/FMVSS/#SN101. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
42. ^ 3+2 Point Seatbelt and Side-Support Airbag
43. ^ "''Ford researches possible next-generation safety belt technology''". Media.ford.com. 2007-12-29. http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=27434. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
44. ^ Volvocars corporate website^{[dead link]}
45. ^ Ichikawa M, Nakahara S, Wakai S (January 2002). "Mortality of front-seat occupants attributable to unbelted rear-seat passengers in car crashes". Lancet 359 (9300): 43–4. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07279-3. PMID 11809187. 
46. ^ Derbyshire, David (2002-01-04). "''"Unbelted rear passengers 'biggest danger in crash"''". Telegraph.co.uk. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/01/04/wbelt04.xml&sSheet=/news/2002/01/04/ixnewstop.html. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
47. ^ Adams, John (1995). Risk. London: UCL Press Ltd. University College. ISBN 1857280687. 
48. ^ Winston FK, Durbin DR, Kallan MJ, Moll EK (June 2000). "The danger of premature graduation to seat belts for young children". Pediatrics 105 (6): 1179–83. doi:10.1542/peds.105.6.1179. PMID 10835054. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10835054. 
49. ^ "Kids at Risk: When Seatbelts are NOT Enough", by Karp H, Reader's Digest (US Edition), November 1999.
50. ^ Road Amendment (Isabelle Broadhead Child Restraint Measures) Rules 2010. No. 46. Rule 1. "New South Wales Government on NSW legislation website". NSW Government. http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/sessionalview/sessional/sr/2010-46.pdf. 
51. ^ ^{a b} Nakahara S, Ichikawa M, Wakai S (2003). "Seatbelt legislation in Japan: high risk driver mortality and seatbelt use". Inj. Prev. 9 (1): 29–32. doi:10.1136/ip.9.1.29. PMC 1730910. PMID 12642555. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1730910. 
52. ^ Allen S, Zhu S, Sauter C, Layde P, Hargarten S (2006). "A comprehensive statewide analysis of seatbelt non-use with injury and hospital admissions: new data, old problem". Academic Emergency Medicine 13 (4): 427–34. doi:10.1197/j.aem.2005.11.003. PMID 16531597. 
53. ^ Bourbeau R, Desjardins D, Maag U, Laberge-Nadeau C (1993). "Neck injuries among belted and unbelted occupants of the front seat of cars". The Journal of trauma 35 (5): 794–9. doi:10.1097/00005373-199311000-00024. PMID 8230348. 
54. ^ Bédard M, Guyatt GH, Stones MJ, Hirdes JP (2002). "The independent contribution of driver, crash, and vehicle characteristics to driver fatalities". Accident; analysis and prevention 34 (6): 717–27. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00072-0. PMID 12371777. 
55. ^ Thomas J (1990). "Road traffic accidents before and after seatbelt legislation--study in a district general hospital". Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 83 (2): 79–81. PMC 1292501. PMID 2319551. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1292501. 
56. ^ Fenton, John (1969-01-24). "Safety Design". The Times. 
57. ^ Streff FM, Geller ES (1988). "An experimental test of risk compensation: between-subject versus within-subject analyses". Accident; analysis and prevention 20 (4): 277–87. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(88)90055-3. PMID 3415759. 
58. ^ Janssen W (1994). "Seat-belt wearing and driving behavior: an instrumented-vehicle study". Accident; analysis and prevention 26 (2): 249–61. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(94)90095-7. PMID 8198694. 
59. ^ "'The Effects of Mandatory Seat Belt Laws on Driving Behavior and Traffic Fatalities' by Alma Cohen and Liran Einav at Harvard Law School" (PDF). http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/pdf/341.pdf. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
60. ^ Spital M, Spital A, Spital R (November 1986). "The compelling case for seat belts on school busses". Pediatrics 78 (5): 928–32. PMID 3763306. 
61. ^ Albers AC (2001). "Should there be laws mandating seatbelts in all school busses? Writing for the pro position". MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 26 (1): 8. doi:10.1097/00005721-200101000-00002. PMID 11198463. http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0361-929X&volume=26&issue=1&spage=8. 
62. ^ Begley CE, Biddle AK (1988). "Cost-benefit analysis of safety belts in Texas school buses". Public Health Rep 103 (5): 479–85. PMC 1478133. PMID 3140273. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1478133. 
63. ^ Seat-belts in School Buses?^{[dead link]}
64. ^ "''Pros, Cons of School Bus Seatbelts''". Wxia.com. http://www.wxia.com/news/article_news.aspx?storyid=112334. Retrieved 2011-02-02. 
65. ^ Garzon DL (2001). "Should there be laws mandating seatbelts in all school buses? Writing for the con position". MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 26 (1): 9. doi:10.1097/00005721-200101000-00003. PMID 11198464. http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=0361-929X&volume=26&issue=1&spage=9. 
66. ^ "EU law makes seat belts obligatory in long distance buses and coaches". European Public Health Alliance. 2006-07-19. http://www.epha.org/a/1765. Retrieved 6 January 2010. 
67. ^ "Passenger Restraint Research - Lap and Diagonal" (PDF). http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/RSSB_Seatbelts2007.pdf. Retrieved 2011-02-02.