 Map projection

A map projection is any method of representing the surface of a sphere or other threedimensional body on a plane. Map projections are necessary for creating maps. All map projections distort the surface in some fashion. Depending on the purpose of the map, some distortions are acceptable and others are not; therefore different map projections exist in order to preserve some properties of the spherelike body at the expense of other properties. There is no limit to the number of possible map projections.
Background
For simplicity, this article usually assumes that the surface to be mapped is the surface of a sphere. However, the Earth and other sufficiently large celestial bodies are generally better modeled as oblate spheroids, and small objects such as asteroids often have irregular shapes. These other surfaces can be mapped as well. Therefore, more generally, a map projection is any method of "flattening" into a plane a continuous surface having curvature in all three spatial dimensions.
Projection as used here is not limited to perspective projections, such as those resulting from casting a shadow on a screen, or the rectilinear image produced by a pinhole camera on a flat film plate. Rather, any mathematical function transforming coordinates from the curved surface to the plane is a projection.
Carl Friedrich Gauss's Theorema Egregium proved that a sphere cannot be represented on a plane without distortion. Since any method of representing a sphere's surface on a plane is a map projection, all map projections distort. Every distinct map projection distorts in a distinct way. The study of map projections is the characterization of these distortions.
A map of the Earth is a representation of a curved surface on a plane. Therefore a map projection must have been used to create the map, and, conversely, maps could not exist without map projections. Maps can be more useful than globes in many situations: they are more compact and easier to store; they readily accommodate an enormous range of scales; they are viewed easily on computer displays; they can facilitate measuring properties of the terrain being mapped; they can show larger portions of the Earth's surface at once; and they are cheaper to produce and transport. These useful traits of maps motivate the development of map projections.
Metric properties of maps
Many properties can be measured on the Earth's surface independently of its geography. Some of these properties are:
Map projections can be constructed to preserve one or more of these properties, though not all of them simultaneously. Each projection preserves or compromises or approximates basic metric properties in different ways. The purpose of the map determines which projection should form the base for the map. Because many purposes exist for maps, many projections have been created to suit those purposes.
Another major concern that drives the choice of a projection is the compatibility of data sets. Data sets are geographic information. As such, their collection depends on the chosen model of the Earth. Different models assign slightly different coordinates to the same location, so it is important that the model be known and that the chosen projection be compatible with that model. On small areas (large scale) data compatibility issues are more important since metric distortions are minimal at this level. In very large areas (small scale), on the other hand, distortion is a more important factor to consider.
Which map is best?
Cartographers have long despaired over publishers' inappropriate use of the Mercator.^{[1]}^{[2]}^{[3]}^{[4]}
A 1943 New York Times editorial states:
The time has come to discard [the Mercator] for something that represents the continents and directions less deceptively... Although its usage... has diminished... it is still highly popular as a wall map apparently in part because, as a rectangular map, it fills a rectangular wall space with more map, and clearly because its familiarity breeds more popularity.^{[5]}The Peters map controversy motivated the American Cartographic Association (now Cartography and Geographic Information Society) to produce a series of booklets (including Which Map is Best^{[6]}) designed to educate the public about map projections and distortion in maps. In 1989 and 1990, after some internal debate, seven North American geographic organizations adopted the following resolution,^{[4]}^{[7]} which rejected all rectangular world maps, a category that includes both the Mercator and the Gall–Peters projections:
WHEREAS, the earth is round with a coordinate system composed entirely of circles, and
WHEREAS, flat world maps are more useful than globe maps, but flattening the globe surface necessarily greatly changes the appearance of Earth's features and coordinate systems, and
WHEREAS, world maps have a powerful and lasting effect on people's impressions of the shapes and sizes of lands and seas, their arrangement, and the nature of the coordinate system, and
WHEREAS, frequently seeing a greatly distorted map tends to make it "look right,"
THEREFORE, we strongly urge book and map publishers, the media and government agencies to cease using rectangular world maps for general purposes or artistic displays. Such maps promote serious, erroneous conceptions by severely distorting large sections of the world, by showing the round Earth as having straight edges and sharp corners, by representing most distances and direct routes incorrectly, and by portraying the circular coordinate system as a squared grid. The most widely displayed rectangular world map is the Mercator (in fact a navigational diagram devised for nautical charts), but other rectangular world maps proposed as replacements for the Mercator also display a greatly distorted image of the spherical Earth.
Construction of a map projection
The creation of a map projection involves two steps:
 Selection of a model for the shape of the Earth or planetary body (usually choosing between a sphere or ellipsoid). Because the Earth's actual shape is irregular, information is lost in this step.
 Transformation of geographic coordinates (longitude and latitude) to Cartesian (x,y) or polar plane coordinates. Cartesian coordinates normally have a simple relation to eastings and northings defined on a grid superimposed on the projection.
Some of the simplest map projections are literally projections, as obtained by placing a light source at some definite point relative to the globe and projecting its features onto a specified surface. This is not the case for most projections which are defined only in terms of mathematical formulae that have no direct physical interpretation.
Choosing a projection surface
A surface that can be unfolded or unrolled into a plane or sheet without stretching, tearing or shrinking is called a developable surface. The cylinder, cone and of course the plane are all developable surfaces. The sphere and ellipsoid are not developable surfaces. As noted in the introduction, any projection of a sphere (or an ellipsoid) onto a plane will have to distort the image. (To compare, one cannot flatten an orange peel without tearing or warping it.)
One way of describing a projection is first to project from the Earth's surface to a developable surface such as a cylinder or cone, and then to unroll the surface into a plane. While the first step inevitably distorts some properties of the globe, the developable surface can then be unfolded without further distortion.
Aspects of the projection
Once a choice is made between projecting onto a cylinder, cone, or plane, the aspect of the shape must be specified. The aspect describes how the developable surface is placed relative to the globe: it may be normal (such that the surface's axis of symmetry coincides with the Earth's axis), transverse (at right angles to the Earth's axis) or oblique (any angle in between). The developable surface may also be either tangent or secant to the sphere or ellipsoid. Tangent means the surface touches but does not slice through the globe; secant means the surface does slice through the globe. Insofar as preserving metric properties goes, it is never advantageous to move the developable surface away from contact with the globe, so that possibility is not discussed here.
Scale
A globe is the only way to represent the earth with constant scale throughout the entire map in all directions. A map cannot achieve that property for any area, no matter how small. It can, however, achieve constant scale along specific lines.
Some possible properties are:
 The scale depends on location, but not on direction. This is equivalent to preservation of angles, the defining characteristic of a conformal map.
 Scale is constant along any parallel in the direction of the parallel. This applies for any cylindrical or pseudocylindrical projection in normal aspect.
 Combination of the above: the scale depends on latitude only, not on longitude or direction. This applies for the Mercator projection in normal aspect.
 Scale is constant along all straight lines radiating from a particular geographic location. This is the defining characteristic of an equidistant projection such as the Azimuthal equidistant projection. There are also projections (Maurer, Close) where true distances from two points are preserved.^{[8]}^{[9]}
Choosing a model for the shape of the Earth
Projection construction is also affected by how the shape of the Earth is approximated. In the following discussion on projection categories, a sphere is assumed. However, the Earth is not exactly spherical but is closer in shape to an oblate ellipsoid, a shape which bulges around the equator. Selecting a model for a shape of the Earth involves choosing between the advantages and disadvantages of a sphere versus an ellipsoid. Spherical models are useful for smallscale maps such as world atlases and globes, since the error at that scale is not usually noticeable or important enough to justify using the more complicated ellipsoid. The ellipsoidal model is commonly used to construct topographic maps and for other large and mediumscale maps that need to accurately depict the land surface.
A third model of the shape of the Earth is the geoid, a complex and more accurate representation of the global mean sea level surface that is obtained through a combination of terrestrial and satellite gravity measurements. This model is not used for mapping, because of its complexity, but is used for control purposes in the construction of geographic datums. (In geodesy, plural of "datum" is "datums" rather than "data".) A geoid is used to construct a datum by adding irregularities to the ellipsoid in order to better match the Earth's actual shape. It takes into account the largescale features in the Earth's gravity field associated with mantle convection patterns, and the gravity signatures of very large geomorphic features such as mountain ranges, plateaus and plains. Historically, datums have been based on ellipsoids that best represent the geoid within the region that the datum is intended to map. Each ellipsoid has a distinct major and minor axis. Different controls (modifications) are added to the ellipsoid in order to construct the datum, which is specialized for a specific geographic region (such as the North American Datum). A few modern datums, such as WGS84 which is used in the Global Positioning System, are optimized to represent the entire earth as well as possible with a single ellipsoid, at the expense of accuracy in smaller regions.
Classification
A fundamental projection classification is based on the type of projection surface onto which the globe is conceptually projected. The projections are described in terms of placing a gigantic surface in contact with the earth, followed by an implied scaling operation. These surfaces are cylindrical (e.g. Mercator), conic (e.g., Albers), or azimuthal or plane (e.g. stereographic). Many mathematical projections, however, do not neatly fit into any of these three conceptual projection methods. Hence other peer categories have been described in the literature, such as pseudoconic, pseudocylindrical, pseudoazimuthal, retroazimuthal, and polyconic.
Another way to classify projections is according to properties of the model they preserve. Some of the more common categories are:
 Preserving direction (azimuthal), a trait possible only from one or two points to every other point
 Preserving shape locally (conformal or orthomorphic)
 Preserving area (equalarea or equiareal or equivalent or authalic)
 Preserving distance (equidistant), a trait possible only between one or two points and every other point
 Preserving shortest route, a trait preserved only by the gnomonic projection
NOTE: Because the sphere is not a developable surface, it is impossible to construct a map projection that is both equalarea and conformal.
Projections by surface
Cylindrical
 See also: List of map projections#Cylindrical.
The term "normal cylindrical projection" is used to refer to any projection in which meridians are mapped to equally spaced vertical lines and circles of latitude (parallels) are mapped to horizontal lines.
The mapping of meridians to vertical lines can be visualized by imagining a cylinder (of which the axis coincides with the Earth's axis of rotation) wrapped around the Earth and then projecting onto the cylinder, and subsequently unfolding the cylinder.
By the geometry of their construction, cylindrical projections stretch distances eastwest. The amount of stretch is the same at any chosen latitude on all cylindrical projections, and is given by the secant of the latitude as a multiple of the equator's scale. The various cylindrical projections are distinguished from each other solely by their northsouth stretching (where latitude is given by φ):
 Northsouth stretching is equal to the eastwest stretching (secant φ): The eastwest scale matches the northsouth scale: conformal cylindrical or Mercator; this distorts areas excessively in high latitudes (see also transverse Mercator).
 Northsouth stretching growing rapidly with latitude, even faster than eastwest stretching (secant² φ: The cylindric perspective (= central cylindrical) projection; unsuitable because distortion is even worse than in the Mercator projection.
 Northsouth stretching grows with latitude, but less quickly than the eastwest stretching: such as the Miller cylindrical projection (secant[4φ/5]).
 Northsouth distances neither stretched nor compressed (1): equidistant cylindrical or plate carrée.
 Northsouth compression precisely the reciprocal of eastwest stretching (cosine φ): equalarea cylindrical (with many named specializations such as Gall–Peters or Gall orthographic, Behrmann, and Lambert cylindrical equalarea). This divides northsouth distances by a factor equal to the secant of the latitude, preserving area but heavily distorting shapes.
In the first case (Mercator), the eastwest scale always equals the northsouth scale. In the second case (central cylindrical), the northsouth scale exceeds the eastwest scale everywhere away from the equator. Each remaining case has a pair of identical latitudes of opposite sign (or else the equator) at which the eastwest scale matches the northsouthscale.
Normal cylindrical projections map the whole Earth as a finite rectangle, except in the first two cases, where the rectangle stretches infinitely tall while retaining constant width.
Pseudocylindrical
Pseudocylindrical projections represent the central meridian and each parallel as a single straight line segment, but not the other meridians. Each pseudocylindrical projection represents a point on the Earth along the straight line representing its parallel, at a distance which is a function of its difference in longitude from the central meridian.
 Sinusoidal: the northsouth scale and the eastwest scale are the same throughout the map, creating an equalarea map. On the map, as in reality, the length of each parallel is proportional to the cosine of the latitude. Thus the shape of the map for the whole earth is the region between two symmetric rotated cosine curves.^{[10]}
The true distance between two points on the same meridian corresponds to the distance on the map between the two parallels, which is smaller than the distance between the two points on the map. The true distance between two points on the same parallel—and the true area of shapes on the map—are not distorted. The meridians drawn on the map help the user to realize the shape distortion and mentally compensate for it.
 Collignon projection, which in its most common forms represents each meridian as 2 straight line segments, one from each pole to the equator.
 Mollweide
 Goode homolosine
 Eckert IV
 Eckert VI
Hybrid
The HEALPix projection combines an equalarea cylindrical projection in equatorial regions with the Collignon projection in polar areas.
Conical
 Equidistant conic
 Lambert conformal conic
 Albers conic
Pseudoconical
 Bonne
 Werner cordiform, upon which distances are correct from one pole, as well as along all parallels.
 Continuous American polyconic
Azimuthal (projections onto a plane)
Azimuthal projections have the property that directions from a central point are preserved (and hence, great circles through the central point are represented by straight lines on the map). Usually these projections also have radial symmetry in the scales and hence in the distortions: map distances from the central point are computed by a function r(d) of the true distance d, independent of the angle; correspondingly, circles with the central point as center are mapped into circles which have as center the central point on the map.
The mapping of radial lines can be visualized by imagining a plane tangent to the Earth, with the central point as tangent point.
The radial scale is r'(d) and the transverse scale r(d)/(R sin(d/R)) where R is the radius of the Earth.
Some azimuthal projections are true perspective projections; that is, they can be constructed mechanically, projecting the surface of the Earth by extending lines from a point of perspective (along an infinite line through the tangent point and the tangent point's antipode) onto the plane:
 The gnomonic projection displays great circles as straight lines. Can be constructed by using a point of perspective at the center of the Earth. r(d) = c tan(d/R); a hemisphere already requires an infinite map,^{[11]}^{[12]}
 The General Perspective Projection can be constructed by using a point of perspective outside the earth. Photographs of Earth (such as those from the International Space Station) give this perspective.
 The orthographic projection maps each point on the earth to the closest point on the plane. Can be constructed from a point of perspective an infinite distance from the tangent point; r(d) = c sin(d/R).^{[13]} Can display up to a hemisphere on a finite circle. Photographs of Earth from far enough away, such as the Moon, give this perspective.
 The azimuthal conformal projection, also known as the stereographic projection, can be constructed by using the tangent point's antipode as the point of perspective. r(d) = c tan(d/2R); the scale is c/(2R cos²(d/2R)).^{[14]} Can display nearly the entire sphere on a finite circle. The full sphere requires an infinite map.
Other azimuthal projections are not true perspective projections:
 Azimuthal equidistant: r(d) = cd; it is used by amateur radio operators to know the direction to point their antennas toward a point and see the distance to it. Distance from the tangent point on the map is proportional to surface distance on the earth (;^{[15]} for the case where the tangent point is the North Pole, see the flag of the United Nations)
 Lambert azimuthal equalarea. Distance from the tangent point on the map is proportional to straightline distance through the earth: r(d) = c sin(d/2R)^{[16]}
 Logarithmic azimuthal is constructed so that each point's distance from the center of the map is the logarithm of its distance from the tangent point on the Earth. r(d) = c ln(d/d_{0}); locations closer than at a distance equal to the constant d_{0} are not shown (,^{[17]} figure 65)
Projections by preservation of a metric property
Conformal
Conformal map projections preserve angles locally. These are some conformal projections:
 Mercator – rhumb lines are represented by straight segments
 Stereographic  shape of circles is conserved
 Roussilhe
 Lambert conformal conic
 Quincuncial map
 Adams hemisphereinasquare projection
 Guyou hemisphereinasquare projection
Equalarea
"Area preserving maps" redirects here. For the mathematical concept, see Measurepreserving dynamical system.These are some projections that preserve area:
 Gall orthographic (also known as Gall–Peters, or Peters, projection)
 Albers conic
 Lambert azimuthal equalarea
 Lambert cylindrical equalarea
 Mollweide
 Hammer
 Briesemeister
 Sinusoidal
 Werner
 Bonne
 Bottomley
 Goode's homolosine
 Hobo–Dyer
 Collignon
 Tobler hyperelliptical
 Snyder’s equalarea polyhedral projection, used for geodesic grids.
Equidistant
These are some projections that preserve distance from some standard point or line:
 Equirectangular—distances along meridians are conserved
 Plate carrée—an Equirectangular projection centered at the equator
 Azimuthal equidistant—distances along great circles radiating from centre are conserved
 Equidistant conic
 Sinusoidal—distances along parallels are conserved
 Werner cordiform distances from the North Pole are correct as are the curved distance on parallels
 Soldner
 Twopoint equidistant: two "control points" are arbitrarily chosen by the map maker. Distance from any point on the map to each control point is proportional to surface distance on the earth.
Gnomonic
Great circles are displayed as straight lines:
Retroazimuthal
Direction to a fixed location B (the bearing at the starting location A of the shortest route) corresponds to the direction on the map from A to B:
 Littrow—the only conformal retroazimuthal projection
 Hammer retroazimuthal—also preserves distance from the central point
 Craig retroazimuthal aka Mecca or Qibla—also has vertical meridians
Compromise projections
Compromise projections give up the idea of perfectly preserving metric properties, seeking instead to strike a balance between distortions, or to simply make things "look right". Most of these types of projections distort shape in the polar regions more than at the equator. These are some compromise projections:
 Robinson
 van der Grinten
 Miller cylindrical
 Winkel Tripel
 Buckminster Fuller's Dymaxion
 B.J.S. Cahill's Butterfly Map
 Kavrayskiy VII
 Wagner VI
 Chamberlin trimetric
 Oronce Fine's cordiform
See also
 World map
 Reversed map
 Cartography
 Cartographer
 List of map projections
 Geographic information system (GIS)
 Geoinformatics
 Plans (drawings)
 Brain mapping
 Tissot's indicatrix
 UV mapping
References
 ^ Bauer, H.A. (1942). "Globes, Maps, and Skyways (Air Education Series)". New York. p. 28
 ^ Miller, Osborn Maitland (1942). "Notes on Cylindrical World Map Projections". Geographical Review 43 (3): 405–409.
 ^ Raisz, Erwin Josephus. (1938). General Cartography. New York: McGraw–Hill. 2d ed., 1948. p. 87.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Robinson, Arthur Howard. (1960). Elements of Cartography, second edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons. p. 82.
 ^ Snyder, John P. (1993). Flattening the Earth: Two Thousand Years of Map Projections p. 157. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226767469. (Summary of the Peters controversy.)
 ^ American Cartographic Association's Committee on Map Projections, 1986. Which Map is Best p. 12. Falls Church: American Congress on Surveying and Mapping.
 ^ American Cartographer. 1989. 16(3): 222–223.
 ^ Snyder, John P. (1993). Flattening the earth: two thousand years of map projections. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0226767469.
 ^ Snyder, John P. (1997). Flattening the earth: two thousand years of map projections. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226767475.
 ^ Weisstein, Eric W., "Sinusoidal Projection" from MathWorld.
 ^ Weisstein, Eric W., "Gnomonic Projection" from MathWorld.
 ^ "The Gnomonic Projection". http://members.shaw.ca/quadibloc/maps/maz0201.htm. Retrieved November 18, 2005.
 ^ Weisstein, Eric W., "Orthographic Projection" from MathWorld.
 ^ Weisstein, Eric W., "Stereographic Projection" from MathWorld.
 ^ Weisstein, Eric W., "Azimuthal Equidistant Projection" from MathWorld.
 ^ Weisstein, Eric W., "Lambert Azimuthal EqualArea Projection" from MathWorld.
 ^ "http://www.gis.psu.edu/projection/chap6figs.html". http://www.gis.psu.edu/projection/chap6figs.html. Retrieved November 18, 2005.
 Fran Evanisko, American River College, lectures for Geography 20: "Cartographic Design for GIS", Fall 2002
 Snyder, J.P. (1989). Album of Map Projections, United States Geological Survey Professional Paper. United States Government Printing Office. 1453. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/usgspubs/pp/pp1453.
 Snyder, John P. (1987). Map Projections—A Working Manual. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.. 1395. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/pubs/pp/pp1395.
 Map Projections—PDF versions of numerous projections, created and released into the Public Domain by Paul B. Anderson ... member of the International Cartographic Association's Commission on Map Projections
External links
 A Cornucopia of Map Projections, a visualization of distortion on a vast array of map projections in a single image.
 B.J.S. Cahill Butterfly Map Resource Page: Articles and images.
 G.Projector, free software by can render many projections (NASA GISS).
 OGR Projections Tutorial(C and Python Bindings
 Generic Mapping Tools (GMT), for creating maps, processing data, and learning firsthand about projections (SOEST).
 Color images of map projections and distortion (Mapthematics.com).
 Geodesy, Cartography and Map Reading course at Colorado State University.
 Geometric aspects of mapping: map projection (KartoWeb.itc.nl).
 Java world map projections, Henry Bottomley (BTInternet).
 Map projections http://www.3dsoftware.com/Cartography/USGS/MapProjections/, archived by the Wayback Machine (3DSoftware).
 Map projections, John Savard.
 Map Projections (MathWorld).
 Map Projections An interactive JAVA applet to study deformations (area, distance and angle) of map projections (UFF.br).
 Map Projections: How Projections Work (Progonos.com).
 Map Projections Poster (U.S. Geographical Survey).
 MapRef: The Internet Collection of MapProjections and Reference Systems in Europe
 "Maps are Not True for All Purposes, These are three of many projections", U.S. WWII Newsmap (UNT Libraries Digital Collections).
 PROJ.4  Cartographic Projections Library.
 Projection Reference Table of examples and properties of all common projections (RadicalCartography.net).
 Understanding Map ProjectionsPDF (1.70 MB), Melita Kennedy (ESRI).
 World Map Projections, Stephen Wolfram based on work by YuSung Chang (Wolfram Demonstrations Project).
 The World Turned Upside Down, Katy Kramer.
Categories: Featured articles on Mathematics Portal
 Cartographic projections
 Cartography
 Infographics
 Descriptive geometry
 Geodesy
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.