Panic of 1819

For the 1962 economic history book by Murray Rothbard, see The Panic of 1819.

The Panic of 1819 was the first major financial crisis in the United States,^[1] which occurred during the end of the Era of Good Feelings. The new nation faced a depression in the late 1780s (which led directly to the establishment of the dollar and, perhaps indirectly, to the calls for a Constitutional Convention), and another severe economic downturn in the late 1790s following the Panic of 1797. In those earlier crises, however, the primary cause of economic turmoil originated in the broader Atlantic economy.^[2] These crises and others that resulted from international conflicts such as the Embargo Act and War of 1812, caused widespread foreclosures, bank failures, unemployment, and a slump in agriculture and manufacturing. However, things would change for the US economy after the Second Bank of the United States was founded in 1816,^[3] in response to the spread of bank notes across United States from private banks, due to inflation brought on by the debt following the war.^[4] In contrast, the causes of the Panic of 1819 largely originated within the U.S. economy. The panic marked the end of the economic expansion that had followed the War of 1812 and ushered in new financial policies that would shape economic development.

Explanations

Different economic schools of thought have offered explanations for the Panic of 1819.

Economists who adhere to Keynesian economic theory suggest that the Panic of 1819 was the early Republic's first experience with the boom-bust cycles common to all modern economies. Clyde Haulman, Professor of Economics at the College of William and Mary,^[5] argues that the Panic was partly caused by a decision to close the Second Bank of the US. Combined with the issue of the depression and overspeculation, the Panic of 1819 marked the beginning of a new phase of American economic history, where mature market institutions would continue to move cyclically from boom to bust. These explanations are not intended to discount the importance of war-time public finance as a cause of the Panic. They simply assert that the closure of the Second Bank of the US were also to blame.^{[citation needed]}

Austrian school economists view the nationwide recession that resulted from the Panic of 1819 as the first failure of expansionary monetary policy. This explanation is based on the Austrian theory of the business cycle. Government borrowed heavily to finance the War of 1812, which caused tremendous strain on the banks’ reserves of specie, leading to a suspension of specie payments in 1814, and then again during the recession of 1819-1821, violating contractual rights of depositors.^[6] The suspension of the obligation to redeem greatly spurred the establishment of new banks and the expansion of bank note issues, and this inflation of money encouraged unsustainable investments to take place. It soon became clear the monetary situation was threatening, and the Second Bank of the United States was forced to call a halt to its expansion and launch a painful process of contraction. There was a wave of bankruptcies, bank failures, and bank runs; prices dropped and wide-scale urban unemployment began. By 1819, land measures in the U.S. had also reached 3,500,000 acres (14,000 km²), and many Americans did not have enough money to pay off their loans.^[7]

The Panic was also partially due to international events. European demand for American foodstuffs was decreased because agriculture in Europe was recovering from the Napoleonic Wars, which had decimated European agriculture. War and revolution in the New World destroyed the supply line of precious metals from Mexico and Peru to Europe. American bankers and businessmen started issuing false banknotes to quickly expand credit. American bankers, who had little experience with corporate charters, promissory notes, bills of exchange, or stocks and bonds, encouraged the speculation boom during the first years of the market revolution. By the end of 1819, the bank would call these loans.^[7]

Small, local ups and downs had occurred in the market since the 1790s, but never to this magnitude. Businesses went bankrupt when they could not meet their debts, and hundreds of thousands of wage workers lost their jobs. For example, unemployment reached 75 percent in Philadelphia, and 1,800 workers were imprisoned for debt.^{[citation needed]} In Baltimore, the unemployed set up a city of tents on the outskirts of the city.

Proposed remedies

Proposed remedies included:

• increase of tariffs (largely proposed by Northern manufacturing interests).
• reduction of tariffs (largely proposed by Southerners, who believed free trade would stimulate the economy and increase demand).
• monetary expansion; i.e., restriction or suspension of specie payment.
• rigid enforcement of specie payment.
• restriction of bank credit.
• direct relief of debtors.
• public works proposals.
• stricter enforcement of anti-usury laws.

In the event, President Monroe, interpreting the economic crisis in the narrow monetary terms then current, limited governmental action to economizing and ensuring fiscal stability. He acquiesced in suspension of specie payments to bank depositors, setting a precedent for the Panics of 1837 & 1857.^[6] Although he agreed to the need for improved transportation facilities, he refused to approve appropriations for internal improvements without prior amendment of the Constitution. Monroe would aid the economy with laws like the Land Act of 1820 and the Relief Act of 1821.^[8]

By 1823, the panic had ended.^[9]

See also

• Crisis of 1857
• Business cycle
• Keynesian economics
• Monetary policy
• Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle
• List of recessions in the United States

References

1. ^ Skaggs, Neil T. (1997). "Crisis of 1819". In Glasner, David; Cooley, Thomas F., eds. Business cycles and depressions: an encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing. pp. 124–25. ISBN 0824009444. 
2. ^ Morris, Richard B. (1987) The forging of the Union, 1781-1789.
3. ^ Rothbard, Murray N. The Panic of 1819
4. ^ Second Bank of the United States/Portrait Gallery
5. ^ Clyde Haulman's Homepage
6. ^ ^{a b} Murray N. Rothbard. A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II. ISBN 0-945466-33-1
7. ^ ^{a b} Panic of 1819 - Ohio History Central - A product of the Ohio Historical Society
8. ^ Lincoln Boyhood National Memorial: Historic Resource Study (Chapter 5)
9. ^ Digital History

Further reading

• Cayton, Andrew R. L. (1982). "The Fragmentation of 'A Great Family': The Panic of 1819 and the Rise of the Middling Interest in Boston, 1818-1822". Journal of the Early Republic (Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 2, No. 2) 2 (2): 143–167. doi:10.2307/3122690. JSTOR 3122690. 
• Blackson, Robert M. (1989). "Pennsylvania Banks and the Panic of 1819: A Reinterpretation". Journal of the Early Republic (Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 9, No. 3) 9 (3): 335–358. doi:10.2307/3123593. JSTOR 3123593. 
• Rothbard, Murray (1962). The Panic of 1819. Ams Pr Inc. ISBN 040451605X. http://mises.org/resources/695/Panic-of-1819-Reactions-and-Policies-The. 
• Sobel, Robert (1988). Panic on Wall Street: A Classic History of America's Financial Disasters. New York: Dutton. ISBN 0525484043. 

External links

• Murray N. Rothbard. Panic of 1819: Reactions and Policies