- Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
region = Western Philosophy
color = #B0C4DE
image_caption = G.W.F. Hegel
name = Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
August 27, 1770( Stuttgart, Germany)
death = death date and age|1831|11|14|1770|08|27 (
German Idealism; Founder of Hegelianism
Logic, Philosophy of history, Aesthetics, Religion, Metaphysics, Epistemology, Political Science,
Aristotle, Heraclitus, Anselm, Descartes, Goethe, Spinoza, Rousseau, Böhme, Kant, Fichte, Hölderlin, Schelling |influenced = Adorno, Barth, Bauer, Bookchin, Bradley, Breton, Croce, Danto, Deleuze, Derrida, Dilthey, Emerson, Engels, Feuerbach, Fukuyama, Gadamer, Gentile, Habermas, Heidegger, Ilyenkov, Kierkegaard, Kojève, Koyré, Küng, Lacan, Lenin, Lukács, Marcuse, Marx, Moltmann, O'Donoghue, Sartre, Stirner, Charles Taylor, Žižek
Absolute idealism, Dialectic, Sublation
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (IPA2|ˈgeɔʁk ˈvɪlhɛlm ˈfʁiːdʁɪç ˈheːgəl) (
August 27, 1770– November 14, 1831) was a German philosopher, and with Johann Gottlieb Fichteand Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling, one of the creators of German idealism.
Hegel influenced writers of widely varying positions, including both his admirers (Bauer, Marx, Bradley, Sartre, Küng, Kojève), and his detractors (Schelling, Kierkegaard, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Russell). Hegel developed a comprehensive philosophical framework, or "system", to account in an integrated and developmental way for the relation of mind and nature, the subject and object of knowledge, and psychology, the state, history, art, religion, and philosophy. In particular, he developed a concept of mind or spirit that manifested itself in a set of contradictions and oppositions that it ultimately integrated and united, such as those between nature and freedom, and
immanenceand transcendence, without eliminating either pole or reducing it to the other. His influential conceptions are of speculative logic or "dialectic," "absolute idealism," "Spirit," negativity, sublation ("Aufhebung" in German), the "Master/Slave" dialectic, "ethical life," and the importance of history.
Early years: 1770-1801
Childhood in Stuttgart
Hegel was born on
August 27, 1770in Stuttgart, in the Duchy of Württembergin southwestern Germany. Christened Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, he was known as Wilhelm to his close family. His father, Georg Ludwig, was "Rentkammersekretär" (secretary to the revenue office) at the court of Karl Eugen, Duke of Württemberg. [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", pp. 2-3; p. 745.] Hegel's mother, Maria Magdalena Louisa ("née" Fromm), was the daughter of a lawyer at the High Court of Justice at the Württemberg court. She died when Hegel was thirteen of a "bilious fever" ("Gallenfieber") which Hegel and his father also caught but narrowly survived. [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", p. 3, incorrectly gives the date as September 20, 1781, and describes Hegel as aged eleven. Cf. the index to Pinkard's book and his "Chronology of Hegel's Life", which correctly give the date as 1783 (pp. 773, 745); see also [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Wilhelm_Friedrich_Hegel#Studien_und_Interessen German Wikipedia] . ] Hegel had a sister, Christiane Luise (1773-1832), and a brother, Georg Ludwig (1776-1812), who was to perish as an officer in Napoleon's Russian campaign of 1812. [ Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", p. 4.]
At the age of three Hegel went to the "German School". When he entered the "Latin School" aged five, he already knew the first declension, having been taught it by his mother.
In 1784 Hegel entered Stuttgart's "Gymnasium Illustre". During his adolescence Hegel read voraciously, copying lengthy extracts in his diary. Authors he read include the poet
Klopstockand writers associated with the Enlightenment such as Christian Garveand Gotthold Ephraim Lessing. Hegel's studies at the "Gymnasium" were concluded with his "Abiturrede" ("graduation speech") entitled "The abortive state of art and scholarship in Turkey."
Student in Tübingen (1788-93)
At the age of eighteen Hegel entered the
Tübinger Stift(a Protestant seminary attached to the University of Tübingen), where two fellow students were to become vital to his development—his exact contemporary, the poet Friedrich Hölderlin, and the younger brilliant philosopher-to-be Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling. Sharing a dislike for what they regarded as the restrictive environment of the Seminary, the three became close friends and mutually influenced each other's ideas. They watched the unfolding of the French Revolutionwith shared enthusiasm. Schelling and Hölderlin immersed themselves in theoretical debates on Kantian philosophy, from which Hegel remained aloof. Hegel at this time envisaged his future as that of a "Popularphilosoph", i.e., a "man of letters" who serves to make the abstruse ideas of philosophers accessible to a wider public; his own felt need to engage critically with the central ideas of Kantianism did not come until 1800.
House tutor in Berne (1793-96) and Frankfurt (1797-1801)
Having received his theological certificate ("Konsistorialexamen") from the Tübingen Seminary, Hegel became "Hofmeister" (house tutor) to an aristocratic family in
Berne(1793-96). During this period he composed the text which has become known as the "Life of Jesus" and a book-length manuscript entitled "The Positivity of the Christian Religion". His relations with his employers having become strained, Hegel gladly accepted an offer mediated by Hölderlin to take up a similar position with a wine merchant's family in Frankfurt, where he moved in 1797. Here Hölderlin exerted an important influence on Hegel's thought. [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", p. 80.] In Frankfurt Hegel composed the essay "The Spirit of Christianity and Its Fate" (not published during Hegel's lifetime).
Jena, Bamberg and Nuremberg: 1801-1816
Early university career in Jena (1801-1807)
In 1801 Hegel came to
Jenawith the encouragement of his old friend Schelling, who was Extraordinary Professor at the University there. Hegel secured a position at the University as a " Privatdozent" (unsalaried lecturer) after submitting a " Habilitationsschrift" (dissertation) on the orbits of the planets. Later in the year Hegel's first book, "The Difference between Fichte's and Schelling's Systems of Philosophy", appeared. He lectured on "Logic and Metaphysics" and, with Schelling, gave joint lectures on an "Introduction to the Idea and Limits of True Philosophy" and held a "Philosophical Disputorium". In 1802 Schelling and Hegel founded a journal, the "Kritische Journal der Philosophie" ("Critical Journal of Philosophy") to which they each contributed pieces until the collaboration was ended by Schelling's departure for Würzburgin 1803.
In 1805 the University promoted Hegel to the position of Extraordinary Professor (unsalaried), after Hegel wrote a letter to the poet and minister of culture
Johann Wolfgang von Goetheprotesting at the promotion of his philosophical adversary Jakob Friedrich Friesahead of him. [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", p. 223.] Hegel attempted to enlist the help of the poet and translator Johann Heinrich Voßto obtain a post at the newly renascent University of Heidelberg, but failed; to his chagrin, Fries was later in the same year made Ordinary Professor (salaried) there. [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", pp. 224-5.]
His finances drying up quickly, Hegel was now under great pressure to deliver his book, the long-promised introduction to his System. Hegel was putting the finishing touches to this book, now called the "Phenomenology of Mind", as Napoleon engaged Prussian troops on
October 14, 1806, in the Battle of Jenaon a plateau outside the city. On the day before the battle, Napoleon entered the city of Jena. Hegel recounted his impressions in a letter to his friend Friedrich Immanuel Niethammer:
I saw the Emperor – this world-soul – riding out of the city on reconnaissance. It is indeed a wonderful sensation to see such an individual, who, concentrated here at a single point, astride a horse, reaches out over the world and masters it [...] this extraordinary man, whom it is impossible not to admire. [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", p. 228.]
Although Napoleon chose not to close down Jena as he had other universities, the city was devastated and students deserted the university in droves, making Hegel's financial prospects even worse. The following February Hegel's landlady Christiana Burkhardt (who had been abandoned by her husband) gave birth to their son Georg Ludwig Friedrich Fischer (1807-31). [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", p. 192.]
Newspaper editor in Bamberg (1807-08) and headmaster in Nuremberg (1808-15)
In March 1807, aged 37, Hegel moved to
Bamberg, where Niethammer had declined and passed on to Hegel an offer to become editor of a newspaper, the "Bamberger Zeitung". Hegel, unable to find more suitable employment, reluctantly accepted. Ludwig Fischer and his mother (whom Hegel may have offered to marry following the death of her husband) stayed behind in Jena. [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", p. 238.]
He was then, in November 1808, again through Niethammer, appointed headmaster of a "Gymnasium" in
Nuremberg, a post he held until 1816. Here Hegel adapted his recently published "Phenomenology of Mind" for use in the classroom. Part of his remit being to teach a class called "Introduction to Knowledge of the Universal Coherence of the Sciences," Hegel developed the idea of an encyclopedia of the philosophical sciences, falling into three parts (logic, philosophy of nature, and philosophy of spirit). [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", p. 337.]
Hegel married Marie Helena Susanna von Tucher (1791-1855), the eldest daughter of a Senator, in 1811. This period saw the publication of his second major work, the "Science of Logic" ("Wissenschaft der Logik"; 3 vols., 1812, 1813, 1816), and the birth of his two legitimate sons, Karl Friedrich Wilhelm (1813-1901) and Immanuel Thomas Christian (1814-1891).
Professor in Heidelberg and Berlin: 1816-1831
Having received offers of a post from the Universities of Erlangen, Berlin, and Heidelberg, Hegel chose Heidelberg, where he moved in 1816. Soon after, in April 1817, his illegitimate son Ludwig Fischer (now ten years old) joined the Hegel household, having thus far spent his childhood in an orphanage. [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", pp. 354-5.] (Ludwig's mother had died in the meantime.) [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", p. 356.]
Hegel published "The Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sentences in Outline" (1817) as a summary of his philosophy for students attending his lectures at Heidelberg.
thumb|right|Hegel with students">
Lithograph by F. Kugler
In 1818 Hegel accepted the renewed offer of the chair of philosophy at the
University of Berlin, which had remained vacant since Fichte's death in 1814. Here he published his " Elements of the Philosophy of Right" (1821). Hegel's efforts were primarily directed at delivering his lectures; his lecture courses on aesthetics, the philosophy of religion, the philosophy of history, and the history of philosophy were published posthumously from lecture notes taken by his students. His fame spread and his lectures attracted students from all over Germany and beyond.
Hegel was appointed Rector of the University in 1830, when he was 60. He was deeply disturbed by the riots for reform in Berlin in that year. In 1831 Frederick William III decorated him for his service to the Prussian state. In August 1831 a
choleraepidemic reached Berlin and Hegel left the city, taking up lodgings in Kreuzberg. Now in a weak state of health, Hegel went out little. As the new semester began in October, Hegel returned to Berlin, with the (mistaken) impression that the epidemic had largely subsided. By November 14Hegel was dead. The physicians pronounced the cause of death as cholera, but it is more likely he died from a gastrointestinal disease. [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", pp. 658-9.] He is said to have uttered the last words "And he didn't understand me" before expiring. [Norman Davies, "Europe: A history" p. 687] In accordance with his wishes, Hegel was buried on November 16in the DorotheenstadtCemetery next to Fichte and Solger.
Hegel's son Ludwig Fischer had died shortly before while serving with the Dutch army in Batavia; the news of his death never reached his father. [Pinkard, "Hegel: A Biography", p. 548.] Early the following year Hegel's sister Christiane committed suicide by drowning. Hegel's sons Karl, who became a historian, and Immanuel, who followed a theological path, lived long lives during which they safeguarded their father's "
Nachlaß" and produced editions of his works.
Hegel published only four books during his life: the "
Phenomenology of Spirit" (or "Phenomenology of Mind"), his account of the evolution of consciousness from sense-perception to absolute knowledge, published in 1807; the " Science of Logic", the logical and metaphysical core of his philosophy, in three volumes, published in 1811, 1812, and 1816 (revised 1831); " Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences", a summary of his entire philosophical system, which was originally published in 1816 and revised in 1827 and 1830; and the " Elements of the Philosophy of Right", his political philosophy, published in 1822. In the latter, he criticized von Haller's reactionary work, which claimed that laws were not necessary. He also published some articles early in his career and during his Berlin period. A number of other works on the philosophy of history, religion, aesthetics, and the history of philosophywere compiled from the lecture notes of his students and published posthumously.
of German Philosophy".
Hegel's writing style is difficult to read; he is described by
Bertrand Russellin the "History of Western Philosophy" as the single most difficult philosopher to understand. This is partly because Hegel tried to develop a new form of thinking and logic, which he called " speculative reason" and which includes the more famous concept of " dialectic," to try to overcome what he saw as the limitations of both common sense and of traditional philosophy at grasping philosophical problems and the relation between thought and reality.
The concept of freedom through Hegel's method
Hegel's thinking can be understood as a constructive development within the broadly Platonic tradition that includes
Aristotleand Kant. To this list one could add Proclus, Meister Eckhart, Leibniz, Bahlsen, Spinoza, Plotinus, Jakob Boehme, and Rousseau. What all these thinkers share, which distinguishes them from materialistslike Epicurus, the Stoics, and Thomas Hobbes, and from empiricistslike David Hume, is that they regard freedom or self-determination both as real and as having important ontological implications, for soul or mind or divinity. This focus on freedom is what generates Plato's notion (in the Phaedo, Republic, and Timaeus) of the soulas having a higher or fuller kind of reality than inanimate objects possess. While Aristotle criticizes Plato's "Forms," he preserves Plato's preoccupation with the ontological implications of self-determination, in his conceptions of ethical reasoning, the hierarchy of soul in nature, the order of the cosmos, and the prime mover. Kant, likewise, preserves this preoccupation of Plato's in his notions of moral and noumenal freedom, and God.
In his discussion of "Spirit" in his "Encyclopedia", Hegel praises Aristotle's "
On the Soul" as "by far the most admirable, perhaps even the sole, work of philosophical value on this topic" (par. 378). And in his "Phenomenology of Spirit" and his " Science of Logic", Hegel's concern with Kantian topics such as freedom and morality, and with their ontological implications, is pervasive. Rather than simply rejecting Kant's dualism of freedom versus nature, Hegel aims to subsume it within "true infinity," the "Concept" (or "Notion": "Begriff"), "Spirit," and "ethical life" in such a way that the Kantian duality is rendered intelligible (as mentioned above), rather than remaining a brute "given."
The reason why this subsumption takes place in a "series" of concepts is that Hegel's method, in his "Science of Logic" and his "Encyclopedia", is to begin with ultra-basic concepts like Being and Nothing, and to develop these through a long sequence of elaborations, including those mentioned in the previous paragraph. In this manner, a solution that is reached, in principle, in the account of "true infinity" in the "Science of Logic"'s chapter on "Quality," is repeated in new guises at later stages, all the way to "Spirit" and "ethical life," in the third volume of the "Encyclopedia".
In this way, Hegel intends to defend the germ of truth in Kantian dualism against reductive or eliminative programs like those of materialism and empiricism (which one can see at work in many of Hegel's critics, including Marx, Nietzsche, and Russell). Like Plato, with his dualism of soul versus bodily appetites, Kant wants to insist on the mind's ability to question its felt inclinations or appetites and to come up with a standard of "duty" (or, in Plato's case, "good") which goes beyond them. Hegel preserves this essential Platonic and Kantian concern in the form of infinity's going beyond the finite (a process that Hegel in fact relates to "freedom" and the "ought" [ See "Science of Logic", trans. Miller [Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities, 1989] , pp. 133-136 and 138, top ] ), the universal's going beyond the particular (in the Concept), and Spirit's going beyond Nature. And Hegel renders these dualities "intelligible" by (ultimately) his argument in the "Quality" chapter of the "Science of Logic" that the finite has to become infinite in order to achieve "reality." This is because, as Hegel suggests by his introduction of the concept of "reality", [ "Science of Logic", p. 111 ] what determines itself rather than depending on its relations to other things for its essential character, is more fully "real" (following the Latin etymology of "real": more "thing-like") than what does not. Finite things don't determine themselves, because, as "finite" things, their essential character is determined by their boundaries, over against other finite things. So, in order to become "real," they must go beyond their finitude ("finitude "is" only as a transcending of itself" [ "Science of Logic", p. 145 ] ).
The result of this argument is that finite and infinite—and, by extension, particular and universal, nature and freedom—don't face one another as two independent realities, but instead the latter (in each case) is the "self-transcending" of the former. [ See "Science of Logic", p. 146, top ] Thus rather than being merely "given," without explanation, the relationship between finite and infinite (and particular and universal, and nature and freedom) becomes intelligible. And a challenge is issued to reductive and eliminative programs like materialism and empiricism: What kind of "reality" do "your" fundamental entities or data possess?
Progress through contradictions and negations
The obscure writings of
Jakob Böhmehad a strong effect on Hegel. Böhme had written that the Fall of Manwas a necessary stage in the evolutionof the universe. This evolution was, itself, the result of God's desire for complete self-awareness. Hegel was fascinated by the works of Spinoza, Kant, Rousseau, and Goethe, and by the French Revolution. Modern philosophy, culture, and society seemed to Hegel fraught with contradictions and tensions, such as those between the subject and object of knowledge, mind and nature, self and Other, freedom and authority, knowledge and faith, the Enlightenment and Romanticism. Hegel's main philosophical project was to take these contradictions and tensions and interpret them as part of a comprehensive, evolving, rational unity that, in different contexts, he called "the absolute idea" or "absolute knowledge".
According to Hegel, the main characteristic of this unity was that it evolved through and manifested itself in
contradictionand negation. Contradiction and negation have a dynamic quality that at every point in each domain of reality— consciousness, history, philosophy, art, nature, society—leads to further development until a rational unity is reached that preserves the contradictions as phases and sub-parts by lifting them up ( Aufhebung) to a higher unity. This whole is mental because it is mindthat can comprehend all of these phases and sub-parts as steps in its own process of comprehension. It is rational because the same, underlying, logical, developmental order underlies every domain of reality and is ultimately the order of self-conscious rational thought, although only in the later stages of development does it come to full self-consciousness. The rational, self-conscious wholeis not a thing or beingthat lies outside of other existing things or minds. Rather, it comes to completion only in the philosophical comprehension of individual existing human minds who, through their own understanding, bring this developmental process to an understanding of itself.
(Note: “Mind” and “Spirit” are the common English translations of Hegel’s use of the German “
Geist.” Some have argued that either of these terms overly “psychologize” Hegel,Fact|date=February 2007 implying a kind of disembodied, solipsistic consciousness like ghostor "soul." Geist combines the meaning of spirit—as in god, ghost or mind—with an intentional force. Fact|date=February 2007)
Central to Hegel's conception of
knowledgeand mind (and therefore also of reality) was the notion of identity in difference, that is that mind externalizes itself in various forms and objects that stand outside of it or opposed to it, and that, through recognizing itself in them, is "with itself" in these external manifestations, so that they are at one and the same time mind and other-than-mind. This notion of identity in difference, which is intimately bound up with his conception of contradiction and negativity, is a principal feature differentiating Hegel's thought from that of other philosophers.
Hegel made the distinction between civil society and state in his "
Elements of the Philosophy of Right". [ [http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/pr/preface.htm Etext of Philosophy of Right Hegel, 1827 (translated by Dyde, 1897)] ] In this work, civil society (Hegel used the term "buergerliche Gesellschaft" though it is now referred to as "Zivilgesellschaft" in German to emphasize a more inclusive community) was a stage on the dialectical relationship between Hegel's perceived opposites, the macro-community of the stateand the micro-community of the family. [ Pelczynski, A.Z.; 1984; 'The Significane of Hegel's speration of the state and civil society' pp1-13 in Pelczynski, A.Z. (ed.); 1984; "The State and Civil Society"; Cambridge University Press ] Broadly speaking, the term was split, like Hegel's followers, to the political leftand right. On the left, it became the foundation for Karl Marx's bourgeois society; [ " ibid" ] to the right it became a description for all non-state aspects of society, expanding out of the economicrigidity of Marxisminto culture, societyand politics[ "ibid" ]
There are views of Hegel's thought as a representation of the summit of early 19th century Germany's movement of philosophical
idealism. It would come to have a profound impact on many future philosophical schools, including schools that opposed Hegel's specific dialectical idealism, such as Existentialism, the historical materialismof Karl Marx, historicism, and British Idealism.
Hegel's influence was immense both within philosophy and in the other sciences. Throughout the 19th century many chairs of philosophy around Europe were held by Hegelians, although
Kierkegaard, Feuerbach, Marx, and Engelswere all opposed to the most central themes of Hegel's philosophy. After less than a generation, Hegel's philosophy was suppressed and even banned by the Prussian right-wing, and was firmly rejected by the left-wingin multiple official writings.
After the period of
Bruno Bauer, Hegel's influence did not make itself felt again until the philosophy of British Idealism and the 20th century Hegelian Neo-Marxismthat began with Georg Lukács. The more recent movement of communitarianismhas a strong Hegelian influence, although a Hegel specialist would argue that that influence is not strong enough, since communitarianism tends toward relativism, which Hegel's philosophy does not.
Hegel's legacy (interpretation)
Some of Hegel's writing was intended for those with advanced knowledge of philosophy, although his "Encyclopedia" was intended as a
textbookin a universitycourse. Nevertheless, like many philosophers, Hegel assumed that his readers would be well-versed in Western philosophy, up to and including Descartes, Spinoza, Hume, Kant, Fichte, and Schelling. For those wishing to read his work without this background, introductions to and commentaries about Hegel can contribute to comprehension, although the reader is faced with multiple interpretations of Hegel's writings from incompatible schools of philosophy. The German philosopher Theodor W. Adornodevoted an essay to the difficulty of reading Hegel and asserted that there are certain passages where it is impossible to decipher what Hegel meant. Difficulties within Hegel's language and thought are magnified for those reading Hegel in translation, since his philosophical language and terminology in German often do not have direct analogues in other languages. For example, the German word "Geist" has connotations of both "mind" and "spirit" in English. English translators have to use the "phenomenology of mind" or "the phenomenology of spirit" to render Hegel's "Phaenomenologie des Geistes", thus altering the original meaning. Hegel himself argued, in his "Science of Logic", that the German language specially lent itself to philosophical thought and writing.
One especially difficult aspect of Hegel's work is his innovation in logic. In response to Immanuel Kant's challenge to the limits of Pure Reason, Hegel developed a radically new form of logic, which he called "speculation", and which is today popularly called
dialectics. The difficulty in reading Hegel was perceived in Hegel's own day, and persists into the 21st century. To understand Hegel fully requires paying attention to his critique of standard logic, such as the law of contradictionand the law of the excluded middle, and, whether one accepts or rejects it, at least taking it seriously. Many philosophers who came after Hegel and were influenced by him, whether adopting or rejecting his ideas, did so without fully absorbing his new speculative or dialectical logic.fact|date=August 2008
If one wanted to provide a big piece of the Hegel puzzle to the beginner, one might present the following statement fromPart One of the Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences: The Logic:
"... a much misunderstood phenomenon in the history of philosophy — the refutation of one system by another, of an earlier by a later. Most commonly the refutation is taken in a purely negative sense to mean that the system refuted has ceased to count for anything, has been set aside and done for. Were it so, the history of philosophy would be, of all studies, most saddening, displaying, as it does, the refutation of every system which time has brought forth. Now although it may be admitted that every philosophy has been refuted, it must be in an equal degree maintained that no philosophy has been refuted. And that in two ways. For first, every philosophy that deserves the name always embodies the Idea: and secondly, every system represents one particular factor or particular stage in the evolution of the Idea. The refutation of a philosophy, therefore, only means that its barriers are crossed, and its special principle reduced to a factor in the completer principle that follows."
Left and Right Hegelianism
Another confusing aspect about the interpretation of Hegel's work is the fact that past historians have spoken of Hegel's influence as represented by two opposing camps. The
Right Hegelians, the allegedly direct disciples of Hegel at the Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität (now known as the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), advocated a Protestantorthodoxy and the political conservatism of the post-Napoleon Restoration period. The Left Hegelians, also known as the Young Hegelians, interpreted Hegel in a revolutionary sense, leading to an advocation of atheismin religion and liberal democracyin politics.
In more recent studies, however, this old paradigm has been questioned. [
Karl Löwith, "From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought," translated by David E. Green, New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.] For one thing, no Hegelians of the period ever referred to themselves as Right Hegelians. That was a term of insult that David Strauss(a self-styled Left Hegelian) hurled at Bruno Bauer(who has most often been classified by historians as a Left Hegelian, but who rejected both titles for himself). For another thing, no so-called Left Hegelian described himself as a follower of Hegel. This includes Moses Hessas well as Karl Marx. Several Left Hegelians openly repudiated or insulted the legacy of Hegel's philosophy. The critiques of Hegel offered from the Left Hegelians radically diverted Hegel's thinking into new directions. Eventually they came to form a disproportionately large part of the literature on and about Hegel.
Perhaps the main reason that so much writing about Hegel emerges from the so-called Left Hegelians is that the Left Hegelians spawned
Marxism, which inspired a global movement lasting more than 150 years, encompassing the Russian Revolution, the Chinese Revolutionand even more national-liberation movements of the 20th century. Yet those movements, to be precise, are not a direct result of Hegel's philosophy.
Twentieth-century interpretations of Hegel were mostly shaped by one-sided schools of thought: British Idealism,
logical positivism, Marxism, Fascismand postmodernism. With reference to Fascism, Italy's Giovanni Gentile"...holds the honor of having been the most rigorous neo-Hegelian in the entire history of Western philosophy and the dishonor of having been the official philosopher of Fascism in Italy." [ Benedetto Croce, "Guide to Aesthetics", Translated by Patrick Romanell, "Translator's Introduction," The Library of Liberal Arts, The Bobbs–Merrill Co., Inc., 1965] However, since the fall of the USSR, a new wave of Hegel scholarship arose in the West, without the preconceptions of the prior schools of thought. Walter Jaeschkeand Otto Pöggelerin Germany, as well as Peter Hodgsonand Howard Kainzin America, are notable for their many contributions to post-USSR thinking about Hegel as published by the Hegel Society of America. Perhaps the most challenging publication from that source has been the new English edition of Hegel's "Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion (1818-1831)" which has challenged most 20th century views about Hegel.
In previous modern accounts of Hegelianism (to undergraduate classes, for example), especially those formed prior to the Hegel renaissance, Hegel's dialectic was most often characterized as a three-step process, "
thesis, antithesis, synthesis"; namely, that a "thesis" (e.g. the French Revolution) would cause the creation of its "antithesis" (e.g. the Reign of Terror that followed), and would eventually result in a "synthesis" (e.g. the Constitutional state of free citizens). However, Hegel used this classification only once, and he attributed the terminology to Immanuel Kant. The terminology was largely developed earlier by Johann Fichtethe neo-Kantian. It was spread by Heinrich Moritz Chalybäus in a popular account of Hegelian philosophy, and since then the misfit terms have stuck. What is wrong with the "thesis-antithesis-synthesis" approach is that it gives the sense that things or ideas are contradicted or opposed by things that come from outside them. To the contrary, the fundamental notion of Hegel's dialectic is that things or ideas have internal contradictions. From Hegel's point of view, analysis or comprehension of a thing or idea reveals that underneath its apparently simple identity or unity is an underlying inner contradiction. This contradiction leads to the dissolution of the thing or idea in the simple form in which it presented itself and to a higher-level, more complex thing or idea that more adequately incorporates the contradiction. The triadic form that appears in many places in Hegel (e.g. being-nothingness-becoming, immediate-mediate-concrete, abstract-negative-concrete) is about this movement from inner contradiction to higher-level integration or unification.
Believing that the traditional description of Hegel's philosophy in terms of thesis-antithesis-synthesis was mistaken, a few scholars, like
Raya Dunayevskayahave attempted to discard the triadic approach altogether. According to their argument, although Hegel refers to "the two elemental considerations: first, the idea of freedom as the absolute and final aim; secondly, the means for realising it, i.e. the subjective side of knowledge and will, with its life, movement, and activity" (thesis and antithesis) he doesn't use "synthesis" but instead speaks of the "Whole": "We then recognised the State as the moral Whole and the Reality of Freedom, and consequently as the objective unity of these two elements." Furthermore, in Hegel's language, the "dialectical" aspect or "moment" of thought and reality, by which things or thoughts turn into their opposites or have their inner contradictions brought to the surface, what he called "aufhebung", is only preliminary to the "speculative" (and not "synthesizing") aspect or "moment", which grasps the unity of these opposites or contradiction. Thus for Hegel, reason is ultimately "speculative", not "dialectical".
It is widely admitted today that the old-fashioned description of Hegel's philosophy in terms of "thesis-antithesis-synthesis" is inaccurate. Nevertheless, such is the persistence of this misnomer that the model and terminology survive in a number of scholarly works,
According to J.N. Findlay, Hegel is the "Aristotle of modern times," and is, "the greatest of European thinkers, engaged in a self-critical enterprise..." (Foreword, "Science of Logic", trans. 1969 by A.V. Miller).
Oswald Spengleradmired Hegel, contrasting what he saw as Hegel's authentically German philosophy with what he considered Marx's foreign and fraudulent ideology. "Hegel stands above, Marx below the level of historical actuality," claimed Spengler. "Take away Hegel’s metaphysics and you will discover a political thinker with a sense of reality unequaled in modern philosophy. As a 'Prussian' by intellectual choice he placed the state at the center of his extraordinarily profound, well-nigh Goethean vision of historical development, whereas Marx, the Englishman by choice, assigned to the economic life the central role in his Darwinian and mechanistic theory of historical 'evolution' (he would call it 'progress')." [ [http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/P%20Soc/Prussianism.Socialism.htm Prussianism And Socialism by Oswald Spengler ] ]
In the latter half of the 20th century, Hegel's philosophy underwent a major renaissance. This was due to: (a) the rediscovery and reevaluation of Hegel as a possible philosophical progenitor of Marxism by philosophically oriented Marxists; (b) a resurgence of the historical perspective that Hegel brought to everything; and (c) an increasing recognition of the importance of his
The book that did the most to reintroduce Hegel into the Marxist canon was perhaps
Georg Lukács' "History and Class Consciousness". This sparked a renewed interest in Hegel reflected in the work of Herbert Marcuse, Theodor W. Adorno, Ernst Bloch, Raya Dunayevskaya, Alexandre Kojèveand Gotthard Güntheramong others. The Hegel renaissance also highlighted the significance of Hegel's early works, i.e. those published prior to the " Phenomenology of Spirit". The direct and indirect influence of Kojève's lectures and writings (on the Phenomenology of Spirit, in particular) mean that it is not possible to understand most French philosophers from Jean-Paul Sartreto Jacques Derridawithout understanding Hegel.
Beginning in the 1960s, Anglo-American Hegel scholarship has attempted to challenge the traditional interpretation of Hegel as offering a metaphysical system: this has also been the approach of Z.A.Pelczynski and
Shlomo Avineri. This view, sometimes referred to as the 'non-metaphysical option', has had a decided influence on many major English language studies of Hegel in the past 40 years.
neoconservativepolitical theorist Francis Fukuyama's controversial book " The End of History and the Last Man" was heavily influenced by Alexandre Kojève. Among modern scientists, the physicist David Bohm, the mathematician William Lawvere, the logician Kurt Gödeland the biologist Ernst Mayrhave been interested in Hegel's philosophical work.Fact|date=June 2007
A late 20th century literature in Western
Theologythat is friendly to Hegel includes such writers as Dale M. Schlitt(1984), Theodore Geraets(1985), Philip M. Merklinger(1991), Stephen Rocker(1995) and Cyril O'Regan(1995). The contemporary theologian Hans Künghas also advanced contemporary scholarship in Hegel studies.
Recently, two prominent American philosophers,
John McDowelland Robert Brandom(sometimes, half-seriously, referred to as the Pittsburgh Hegelians), have produced philosophical works exhibiting a marked Hegelian influence. Each is avowedly influenced by the late Wilfred Sellars, also of Pittsburgh, who referred to his seminal work, "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind," as a series of "incipient "Méditations Hegeliennes" (in homage to Edmund Husserl's treatise, "Meditations Cartesiennes").
Beginning in the 1990s, after the fall of the
USSR, a fresh reading of Hegel took place in the West. For these scholars, fairly well represented by the Hegel Society of America and in cooperation with German scholars such as Otto Pöggeler and Walter Jaeschke, Hegel's works should be read without preconceptions. Marx plays a minor role in these new readings, and some contemporary scholars have suggested that Marx's interpretation of Hegel is irrelevant to a proper reading of Hegel. Some American philosophers associated with this movement include Clark Butler, Vince Hathaway, Daniel Shannon, David Duquette, David MacGregor, Edward Beach, John Burbidge, Lawrence Stepelevich, Rudolph Siebert, Randall Jackwak, Theodore Geraets and William Desmond.
Hegel used his system of
dialecticsto explain the whole of the history of philosophy, science, art, politicsand religion, but he has had many critics over the centuries. Perhaps the most famous critics were the Left-Hegelians, including Ludwig Feuerbach, Karl Marxand Friedrich Engelsand their followers in the 19th century.
In Britain, Hegel exercised an influence on the philosophical school called "British Idealism," which included
Francis Herbert Bradleyand Bernard Bosanquet, in England, and Josiah Royceat Harvard. However, Analytic philosophy, which still continues to dominate philosophy departments in the United States and the United Kingdom , was virtually founded when G. E. Mooreand Bertrand Russellrejected British Idealism and their colleagues' admiration for Hegel. Hegel remains largely out of fashion in these departments even to this day. Logical Positivists such as Alfred Jules Ayerand the Vienna Circlecriticized his ideas and their supporters such as F. H. Bradley.
The trend towards criticism of Hegel has been widespread in the 19th and the 20th centuries, and has included individuals such as
Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Bertrand Russell, G.E. Moore, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Eric Voegelin, Alfred Ayer, Martin Heidegger, Jacques Derrida, and many others. In the late 20th century this trend was resisted by Professor Jon Stewart ( Northwestern University, Illinois) in 1996 with his book, "The Hegel Myths and Legends".
Some 20th century critics suggested that Hegel glosses over the realities of history in order to fit it into his dialectical mold.
Erich Helleropines in his "The Disinherited Mind" (1952) that Hegel was proved wrong — by the poets who succeeded him, not by the unfolding reality. Some newer philosophers who prefer to follow the tradition of British Philosophy have made similar statements.
A well known charge of obscurantist "
pseudo-philosophy" against Hegel was made by his contemporary Schopenhauer, who wrote that Hegel's philosophy is:
Moreover, modern analytic and positivistic philosophers have considered Hegel a principal target because of what they consider the
obscurantismof his philosophy.
When the scientist
Ludwig Boltzmannwanted to learn the profound answers to his questions about life and nature, the culture of his time directed him to Hegel's works. "To go straight to the deepest depths, I went for Hegel; what unclear thoughtless flow of words I was to find there!". [Ludwig Boltzmann, "Theoretical physics and philosophical problems: Selected writings", p. 155, D. Reidel, 1974, ISBN 90-277-0250-0] He soon turned his quest to the works of other philosophers.
Another popular criticism of Hegel came from
Bertrand Russell, who was one of the leading figures in analytical philosophy. As an advocate for clarity in language Russell has openly criticised and mocked Hegel in his book "Unpopular Essays". Russell also targeted Hegel again, in his " A History of Western Philosophy" claiming that "...he...is the hardest to understand of all the great philosophers" but also admitting that "Even if [as I myself believe] almost all Hegel's doctrines are false, he still retains an importance...as the best representation of a certain kind of philosophy." Also like Schopenhauer, Russell notes that much of Hegel's philosophy is merely an elaboration of his mystic insight which Hegel was attracted to in his younger years. Russell also attacks Hegel calling his logic "obscure" and accusing him of making knowledge "metaphysically impossible" because of Hegel's attempt to get rid of the in-itself.
Nietzsche criticized Hegel's claims about the Absolute.Quotation| Words are but symbols for the relations of things to one another and to us; nowhere do they touch upon absolute truth. ... Thus it is, today, after Kant, an audacious ignorance if here and there, especially among badly informed theologians who like to play philosopher, the task of philosophy is represented as being quite certainly "comprehending the Absolute with the consciousness," somewhat completely in the form "the Absolute is already present, how could it be sought somewhere else?" as Hegel has expressed it.|
Friedrich Nietzsche| Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks", § 11.
Kierkegaard, one of Hegel's earliest critics, criticized Hegel's "absolute knowledge" unity, not only because it was arrogant for a mere human to claim such a unity, but also because such a system negates the importance of the individual in favour of the whole unity. In "Concluding Unscientific Postscript", one of Kierkegaard's main attacks of Hegel, he writes, under the
In the 20th century, Popper suggested that Hegel's system formed a thinly veiled justification for the absolute rule of Frederick William III, and that Hegel's idea of the ultimate goal of history was to reach a state approximating that of 1830s
Prussia.He argued that Hegel's philosophy eventually inspired both Marxismand fascism.
This view of Hegel as an apologist of state power and precursor of 20th century
totalitarianismwas criticized by Herbert Marcusein his "Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory", on the grounds that Hegel was not an apologist for any state or form of authority simply because it existed: for Hegel the state must always be rational. Other scholars, e.g. Walter Kaufmann and Shlomo Avineri, have also criticized Popper's theories about Hegel. (See for instance Walter Kaufmann 1959, [http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/kaufmann.htm "The Hegel Myth and Its Method"] .) An analysis against Popper's arguments can also be found in Joachim Ritter's influential work, "Hegel and the French Revolution".
Following Schopenhauer and Kierkegaard, Popper accused Hegel's philosophy of being essentially vacuous, labeling it "bombastic and mystifying cant."
Santayana also interpreted Hegel as defending whoever held power, the position that
might makes right.
Hegel's relation to the Prussian government was described by Lange: Lange was referring to the Prussian Ministry of Education and Medicine's decree commanding the Royal Science Examinations Commission to suppress any "shallow and superficial" non–Hegelian philosophy. [Lange, F.A.,"History of Materialism", Book II, Section I, Chapter 2, Footnote 48]
Fries accused Hegel of defending the existing order, and his own privileged position within it. He argued that, "Hegel's metaphysical mushroom has grown not in the gardens of science but on the dunghill of servility." [G. W. F. Hegel, "Elements of the Philosophy of Right", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991, pg 15-16] For Fries, Hegel's theories merely added up to a defence of the establishment and, specifically, the Prussian authorities.
Gauss noticed that Hegel's discussion of the Natural Sciences was inaccurate:
Wilhelm Krug challenged Hegel to "deduce his quill (pen)." In other words, he dared Hegel to arrive at knowledge of a particular thing from the obscure logical abstractions of
Absolute idealism's philosophy of nature.
Perhaps the most scathing criticism has come from the psychoanalyst
Carl Jung, who associated Hegel with mental illnesswhen he wrote:
Published during Hegel's lifetime
* "Differenz des Fichteschen und Schellingschen Systems der Philosophie", 1801
"The Difference Between Fichte's and Schelling's Systems of Philosophy", tr. H. S. Harris and Walter Cerf, 1977
* "Phänomenologie des Geistes", 1807
"Phenomenology of Mind", tr. J. B. Baillie, 1910; 2nd ed. 1931"Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit", tr. A. V. Miller, 1977
* "Wissenschaft der Logik", 1812, 1813, 1816
"Science of Logic", tr. W. H. Johnston and L. G. Struthers, 2 vols., 1929;tr. A. V. Miller, 1969
* "Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften", 1817; 2nd ed. 1827; 3rd ed. 1830 ("Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences")
(Pt. I:) "The Logic of Hegel", tr. William Wallace, 1874, 2nd ed. 1892;tr. T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting and H. S. Harris, 1991(Pt. II:) "Hegel's Philosophy of Nature", tr. A. V. Miller, 1970(Pt. III:) "Hegel's Philosophy of Mind", tr. William Wallace, 1894; rev. by A. V. Miller, 1971
* "Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts", 1821
"Elements of the Philosophy of Right", tr. T. M. Knox, 1942;tr. H. B. Bisnet, ed. Allen W. Wood, 1991
Lectures on Aesthetics"
Lectures on the Philosophy of History" (also translated as "Lectures on the Philosophy of World History") 1837
Lectures on Philosophy of Religion"
* "Lectures on the History of Philosophy"
* Beiser, Frederick C., 2005. "Hegel". Routledge
* Findlay, J. N., 1958. "Hegel: A Re-examination". Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-519879-4
Gouin, Jean-Luc, 2000. "Hegel ou de la Raison intégrale", suivi de : « Aimer Penser Mourir : Hegel, Nietzsche, Freud en miroirs », Montréal (Québec), Éditions Bellarmin, 225 p. ISBN 2-89007-883-3
* Houlgate, Stephen, 2005. "An Introduction to Hegel. Freedom, Truth and History". Oxford: Blackwell
* Kainz, Howard P., 1996. "G. W. F. Hegel". Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-8214-1231-0.
* Kaufmann, Walter, 1965. "Hegel: A Reinterpretation". New York: Doubleday (reissued Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1978)
* Plant, Raymond, 1983. "Hegel: An Introduction." Oxford: Blackwell
* Singer, Peter, 2001. "Hegel: A Very Short Introduction". Oxford University Press (previously issued in the OUP "Past Masters" series, 1983)
* Stirling, James Hutchison, "
The Secret of Hegel": Being the Hegelian System in Origin Principle, Form and Matter
* Taylor, Charles, 1975. "Hegel". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-29199-2. A comprehensive exposition of Hegel's thought and its impact on the central intellectual and spiritual issues of his and our time.
* Scruton, Roger, "Understanding Hegel" in "The Philosopher on Dover Beach", Manchester: Carcanet Press, 1990. ISBN 0-85635-857-6
* Beiser, Frederick C. (ed.), 1993. "The Cambridge Companion to Hegel". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-38711-6. A collection of articles covering the range of Hegel's thought.
* Adorno, Theodor W., 1994. "Hegel: Three Studies". MIT Press. Translated by Shierry M. Nicholsen, with an introduction by Nicholsen and Jeremy J. Shapiro, ISBN 0-262-51080-4. Essays on Hegel's concept of spirit/mind, Hegel's concept of experience, and why Hegel is difficult to read.
* Althaus, Horst, 1992. "Hegel und die heroischen Jahre der Philosophie". Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag. Eng. tr. Michael Tarsh as "Hegel: An Intellectual Biography", Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000
* Pinkard, Terry P., 2000. "Hegel: A Biography". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-49679-9. By a leading American Hegel scholar; aims to debunk popular misconceptions about Hegel's thought.
* Rosenkranz, Karl, 1844. "Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegels Leben". Still an important source for Hegel's life.
* Hondt, Jacques d', 1998. "Hegel: Biographie". Calmann-Lévy
* Rockmore, Tom, 1993. "Before and After Hegel: A Historical Introduction to Hegel's Thought". Indianapolis: Hackett. ISBN 0-87220-648-3.
* Löwith, Karl, 1964. "From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought." Translated by David E. Green. New York: Columbia University Press.
* Lukács, Georg, 1948. "Der junge Hegel". Zurich and Vienna (2nd ed. Berlin, 1954). Eng. tr. Rodney Livingstone as "The Young Hegel", London: Merlin Press, 1975. ISBN 0-262-12070-4
* Harris, H. S., 1972. "Hegel's Development: Towards the Sunlight 1770-1801". Oxford: Clarendon Press
* Harris, H. S., 1983. "Hegel's Development: Night Thoughts (Jena 1801-1806)". Oxford: Clarendon Press
* Dilthey, Wilhelm, 1906. "Die Jugendgeschichte Hegels" (repr. in "Gesammelte Schriften", 1959, vol. IV)
* Haering, Theodor L., 1929, 1938. "Hegel: sein Wollen und sein Werk", 2 vols. Leipzig (repr. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1963)
Recent English-language literature
* Inwood, Michael, 1983. "Hegel". London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ("Arguments of the Philosophers")
* Rockmore, Tom, 1986. "Hegel's Circular Epistemology". Indiana University Press
* Pinkard, Terry P., 1988. "Hegel's Dialectic: The Explanation of Possibility". Temple University Press
* Westphal, Kenneth, 1989. "Hegel's Epistemological Realism". Kluwer Academic Publishers
* Forster, Michael N., 1989. "Hegel and Skepticism". Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-38707-4
* Pippin, Robert B., 1989. "Hegel's Idealism: the Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness". Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-37923-7. Advocates a stronger continuity between Hegel and Kant.
Phenomenology of Spirit
"(See also the article "
The Phenomenology of Spirit".)"
* Stern, Robert, 2002. "Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit". Routledge. ISBN 0-415-21788-1. An introduction for students.
* Cohen, Joseph, 2007. "Le sacrifice de Hegel". (In French language). Paris, Galilée. An extensive study of the question of sacrifice in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit.
* Hyppolite, Jean, 1946. "Genèse et structure de la Phénoménologie de l'esprit". Paris: Aubier. Eng. tr. Samuel Cherniak and John Heckman as "Genesis and Structure of Hegel's "Phenomenology of Spirit", Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1979. ISBN 0-8101-0594-2. A classic commentary.
* Kojève, Alexandre, 1947. "Introduction à la lecture de Hegel". Paris: Gallimard. Eng. tr. James H. Nichols, Jr., as "Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit", Basic Books, 1969. ISBN 0-8014-9203-3 Influential European reading of Hegel.
* Solomon, Robert C., 1983. "In the Spirit of Hegel". Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, H. S., 1995. "Hegel: Phenomenology and System". Indianapolis: Hackett. A distillation of the author's monumental two-volume commentary "Hegel's Ladder".
* Westphal, Kenneth R., 2003. "Hegel's Epistemology: A Philosophical Introduction to the" Phenomenology of Spirit. Indianapolis: Hackett. ISBN 0-87220-645-9
* Russon, John, 2004. "Reading Hegel's Phenomenology". Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-21692-3.
* Bristow, William, 2007. "Hegel and the Transformation of Philosophical Critique". Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199290644
* Kalkavage, Peter, 2007. "The Logic of Desire: An Introduction to Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit". Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books. ISBN 9781589880375. This work provides insights on Hegel's complex work as a whole as well as serving as a sure guide for every chapter and for virtually every paragraph.
* Scruton, Roger, "Understanding Hegel" in "The Philosopher on Dover Beach", Manchester: Carcanet Press, 1990. ISBN 0-85635-857-6
"(See also the article "
Science of Logic".)"
* Hartnack, Justus, 1998. "An Introduction to Hegel's Logic". Indianapolis: Hackett. ISBN 0-87220-424-3
* Schäfer, Rainer, 2001."Die Dialektik und ihre besonderen Formen in Hegels Logik". Hamburg/Meiner. ISBN 3-7873-1585-3.
* Wallace, Robert M., 2005. "Hegel's Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God". Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-84484-3. Through a detailed analysis of Hegel's "Science of Logic", Wallace shows how Hegel contributes to the broadly Platonic tradition of philosophy that includes Aristotle, Plotinus, and Kant. In the course of doing this, Wallace defends Hegel against major critiques, including the one presented by Charles Taylor in his "Hegel".
* Avineri, Shlomo, 1974. "Hegel's Theory of the Modern State". Cambridge University Press. Best introduction to Hegel's political philosophy.
* Ritter, Joachim, 1984. "Hegel and the French Revolution". MIT Press.
* Riedel, Manfred, 1984. "Between Tradition and Revolution: The Hegelian Transformation of Political Philosophy", Cambridge.
* Marcuse, Herbert, 1941. "Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory". An introduction to the philosophy of Hegel, devoted to debunking the conception that Hegel's work included "in nuce" the
Fascist totalitarianismof National Socialism; the negation of philosophy through historical materialism.
* Rose, Gillian, 1981. "Hegel Contra Sociology". Athlone Press. ISBN 0-485-12036-4.
* Scruton, Roger, "Hegel as a conservative thinker" in "The Philosopher on Dover Beach", Manchester: Carcanet Press, 1990. ISBN 0-85635-857-6
* Desmond, William, 2003. "Hegel's God: A Counterfeit Double?". Ashgate. ISBN 0-7546-0565-5
* O'Regan, Cyril, 1994. "The Heterodox Hegel". State University of New York Press, Albany. ISBN 0-7914-2006-X. The most authoritative work to date on Hegel's philosophy of religion.
* Cohen, Joseph, 2005. "Le spectre juif de Hegel" (in French language); Preface by Jean-Luc Nancy. Paris, Galilée.An extensive study of the Jewish question in Hegel's Early Theological Writings.
* Dickey, Laurence, 1987. "Hegel: Religion, Economics, and the Politics of Spirit, 1770–1807". Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-33035-1. A fascinating account of how "Hegel became Hegel", using the guiding hypothesis that Hegel "was basically a theologian manqué".
* Popper, Karl. "The Open Society and Its Enemies", vol. 2: "Hegel and Marx". An influential attack on Hegel.
* Stewart, Jon, ed., 1996. "The Hegel Myths and Legends". Northwestern University Press.
Volume numbers and divisions of his completed works
For the volume numbers of his complete works (Gesammelte Werke) and thecorresponding subjects of each volume see
Thesis, antithesis, synthesis
The Secret of Hegel
* [http://wiki.hegel.net The new HegelWiki]
* [http://hegel.net/en/hegelbio.htm A superior biography of Hegel with graphics]
* [http://hegel.net Hegel.net] - resources available under the GNU FDL
* [http://wiki.hegel.net/index.php/Hegel Hegel.net] - wiki article on Hegel
* [http://www.aliciafarinati.com.ar Alicia Farinati - Hegelian Works] Several articles on Hegel. Available in English, Spanish and French
* [http://hegel.net/en/links.htm Commented link list]
* [http://philosophieohnegnade.blogspot.com/ Discussion, Interpretations and Questions about Hegel]
* [http://hegel.net/en/ml.htm Hegel mailing lists in the internet]
* [http://hegel-system.de/en/ Explanation of Hegel] , mostly in German
* [http://www.kat.gr/kat/history/Mod/Th/Hegelianism.htm Discussion of the Hegelian tradition, including the Left and Right schism]
* [http://www.hegel.org/ The Hegel Society of America]
* [http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/hegel.html Hegel page in 'The History Guide']
* [http://millinerd.com/2006/05/is-hegel-christian.html Is Hegel a Christian?]
* [http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/issue/view/12 'The Spirit of the Age: Hegel and the Fate of Thinking' double issue of the journal Cosmos and History]
Hegel's texts online
* [http://www.class.uidaho.edu/mickelsen/texts/Hegel%20-%20Philosophy%20of%20History.htm Philosophy of History Introduction]
* [http://libcom.org/library/philosophy-right-hegel Hegel's The Philosophy of Right]
* [http://libcom.org/library/philosophy-history-hegel Hegel's The Philosophy of History]
* [http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/index.htm Hegel by HyperText] , reference archive on
ALTERNATIVE NAMES=Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich
SHORT DESCRIPTION=German philosopher
DATE OF BIRTH=birth date|1770|8|27|mf=y
PLACE OF BIRTH=
DATE OF DEATH=death date|1831|11|14|mf=y
PLACE OF DEATH=
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.