 Point particle

Standard model of particle physics ConstituentsLimitationsA point particle (ideal particle^{[1]} or pointlike particle, often spelled pointlike particle) is an idealization of particles heavily used in physics. Its defining feature is that it lacks spatial extension: being zerodimensional, it does not take up space.^{[2]} A point particle is an appropriate representation of any object whose size, shape, and structure is irrelevant in a given context. For example, from far enough away, an object of any shape will look and behave as a pointlike object.
In the theory of gravity, physicists often discuss a point mass, meaning a point particle with a nonzero mass and no other properties or structure. Likewise, in electromagnetism, physicists discuss a point charge, a point particle with a nonzero charge.^{[3]}
Sometimes due to specific combinations of properties extended objects behave as pointlike even in their immediate vicinity. For example, spherical objects interacting in 3dimensional space whose interactions are described by the inverse square law behave in such a way as if all their matter were concentrated in their geometric centers. In Newtonian gravitation and classical electromagnetism, for example, the respective fields outside of a spherical object are identical to those of a point particle of equal charge/mass located at the center of the sphere.^{[4]}^{[5]}
In quantum mechanics, the concept of a point particle is complicated by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle: Even an elementary particle, with no internal structure, occupies a nonzero volume. For example, a 1s electron in a hydrogen atom occupies a volume of ~10^{30} m^{3}. There is nevertheless a distinction between elementary particles such as electrons or quarks, which have no internal structure, versus composite particles such as protons, which do have internal structure: A proton is made of three quarks. Elementary particles are sometimes called "point particles", but this is in a different sense than discussed above. For more details see elementary particle.
Contents
Point mass
Point mass (pointlike mass) is an idealistic term used to describe either matter which is infinitely small, or an object which can be thought of as infinitely small. This concept in terms of size is similar to that of point particles, however unlike point particles the object need only be considered infinitely small.
Application
Physics
A common use for point mass lies in the analysis of the gravitational force fields. When analyzing the gravitational forces in a system, it becomes impossible to account for every unit of mass individually. When none of the objects in the system have overlapping center of mass circumferences, it is possible to consider the object as a zerodimensional point mass.
Mathematics
A point mass in statistics is a discontinuous segment in a probability distribution. To calculate such point mass, an integration is carried out over the entire range of the random variable, on the probability distribution of the continuous part. After equating this integral to 1, the point mass can be found by further calculation.
Point charge
A point charge is an idealized model of a particle which has an electric charge. A point charge is an electric charge at a mathematical point with no dimensions.
The fundamental equation of electrostatics is Coulomb's law, which describes the electric force between two point charges. The electric field associated with a classical point charge increases to infinity as the distance from the point charge decreases towards zero making energy (thus mass) of point charge infinite. In quantum electrodynamics, developed in part by Richard Feynman, the mathematical method of renormalization eliminates the infinite divergence of the point charge.
Earnshaw's theorem states that a collection of point charges cannot be maintained in an equilibrium configuration solely by the electrostatic interaction of the charges.
In quantum mechanics
Main article: Elementary particleIn quantum mechanics, there is a distinction between an elementary particle (also called "point particle") and a composite particle. An elementary particle, such as an electron, quark, or photon, is a particle with no internal structure, whereas a composite particle, such as a proton or neutron, has an internal structure (see figure). However, neither elementary nor composite particles are spatially localized, because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The particle wavepacket always occupies a nonzero volume. For example, see atomic orbital: The electron is an elementary particle, but its quantum states form threedimensional patterns.
Nevertheless, there is good reason that an elementary particle is often called a point particle. Even if an elementary particle has a delocalized wavepacket, the wavepacket is in fact a quantum superposition of quantum states wherein the particle is exactly localized. This is not true for a composite particle, which can never be represented as a superposition of exactlylocalized quantum states. It is in this sense that physicists can discuss the intrinsic "size" of a particle: The size of its internal structure, not the size of its wavepacket. The "size" of an elementary particle, in this sense, is exactly zero.
For example, for the electron, experimental evidence shows that the size of an electron is less than 10^{18} m.^{[6]} This is consistent with the expected value of exactly zero. (This should not be confused with the classical electron radius, which, despite the name, is unrelated to the actual size of an electron.)
See also
 Elementary Particle
 Charge (physics) (general concept, not limited to electric charge)
 Selfpropelled particle
Notes and references
Notes
 ^ H.C. Ohanian, J.T. Markert (2007), p. 3
 ^ F.E. Udwadia, R.E. Kalaba (2007), p. 1
 ^ R. Snieder (2001), pp. 196–198
 ^ I. Newton, I.B Cohen, A. Whitmann (1999), p. 956 (Proposition 75, Theorem 35)
 ^ I. Newton, A. Motte, J. Machin (1729), p. 270–271
 ^ "Precision pins down the electron's magnetism". http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/29724.
Bibliography
 H.C. Ohanian, J.T. Markert (2007). Physics for Engineers and Scientists. 1 (3rd ed.). Norton. ISBN 9780393930030.
 F.E. Udwadia, R.E. Kalaba (2007). Analytical Dynamics: A New Approach. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521048338.
 R. Snieder (2001). A Guided Tour of Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521787513.
 I. Newton (1729). The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. A. Motte, J. Machin (trans.). Benjamin Motte. http://books.google.com/?id=Tm0FAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA270.
 I. Newton (1999). The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. I.B. Cohen, A. Whitman (trans.). University of California Press. ISBN 0520088174.
 C. Quigg (2009). "Particle, Elementary". Particle, Elementary. Grolier Online. http://ea.grolier.com/article?id=030375000. Retrieved 20090704.
 S.L. Glashow (2009). "Quark". Encyclopedia Americana. Grolier Online. http://ea.grolier.com/article?id=032578000. Retrieved 20090704.
 M. Alonso, E.J. Finn (1968). Fundamental University Physics Volume III: Quantum and Statistical Physics. AddisonWesley. ISBN 0201002620.
Further reading
 Eric W. Weisstein, "Point Charge".
 F. H. J. Cornish, "Classical radiation theory and point charges". Proc. Phys. Soc. 86 427442, 1965. doi:10.1088/03701328/86/3/301
 O. D. Jefimenko, "Direct calculation of the electric and magnetic fields of an electric point charge moving with constant velocity". Am. J. Phys.62 (1994), 79.
Categories: Introductory physics
 Electromagnetism
 Fundamental physics concepts
 Classical mechanics
 Mass
 Physics
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.