Referendums in New Zealand

New Zealand

This article is part of the series: Politics and government of New Zealand

Constitution Executive (The Crown) Sovereign (Elizabeth II) Governor General (Jerry Mateparae) Executive Council Cabinet Prime Minister (John Key) Public sector organisations Government of New Zealand Legislative (Parliament) Statute of Westminster 1931 Current Parliament (49th) House of Representatives Speaker of the House (Lockwood Smith) Official Opposition Leader of the Opposition (Phil Goff) Referendums Elections Parliamentary constituencies Electoral system Electoral reform Last election (2008) Last local body election (2010) Judicial Supreme Court Chief Justice (Dame Sian Elias) Court of Appeal President (Mark O'Regan) High Court District Court Employment Court Environment Court Courts Martial Appeal Court Māori Land Court Waitangi Tribunal Other tribunals and authorities Regions and territories Realm of New Zealand Territorial authorities of New Zealand North Island South Island Stewart Island/Rakiura Chatham Islands General Regions Political culture Māori politics Foreign relations New Zealand's nuclear-free zone Political parties

Other countries · Atlas Politics portal view · talk · edit

Referendums (or referenda) are held only occasionally by the Government of New Zealand. Ten referendums have been held so far (excluding referendums on alcohol licensing, which were held triennially between 1894 and 1989). Seven were government-led, and three were indicative citizen "initiatives".

Government referendums

The government of New Zealand may, at any time, call for a referendum on any issue, but must pass enabling legislation first, otherwise the resulting referendums will be indicative, not binding on central government. This provision allows some parliamentary scrutiny of the issue and wording of the question. There is no constraint on whether an issue is to be decided by the New Zealand Parliament or by the public. The only exceptions to this are the term of Parliament and several other aspects of the electoral process,^[1] which can be changed only through a referendum or by at least 75% of MPs voting for the change. This has led to the sporadic use of referendums, partly because there is no constitutional requirement, as there is in other countries like Australia or Switzerland that have codified constitutions.

Constitutional referendums

There is no requirement for a referendum to enact constitutional change in New Zealand. Referendums were held in 1992 and 1993 to decide the nature of electoral reform in New Zealand. Many groups advocate approval of constitutional reforms by referendums; for example the Republican Movement supports a referendum on whether New Zealand should become a republic.

The term of Parliament may be changed only either through a referendum or by a 75% majority of MPs.^[2]

There are frequent calls for the use of referendums to decide other constitutional matters, rather than by regular Acts of Parliament. In 2003 the Fifth Labour Government replaced the Privy Council as New Zealand's highest court of appeal with a new Supreme Court, despite calls from New Zealand First, National and ACT for a referendum to be held on the issue. In 1950 the abolition of the Legislative Council by the First National Government was done by Act of Parliament; with additional members of the Legislative Council (MLC) appointed to ensure approval by the upper house, the suicide squad.

See also: New Zealand constitution

Date	Turnout	Issue	Result
23 September 1967	69.7	Term of Parliament	68.1 % in favour of staying at three year maximum
27 October 1990	85.2	Term of Parliament	69.3 % in favour of staying at three year maximum
19 September 1992	55.2	Voting system	84.7% for change, 70.5% to MMP
6 November 1993	85.2	Voting system	53.9% for MMP
26 November 2011		Voting system

Liquor licensing referendums

In New Zealand, alcohol licensing has historically been decided by referendum. The first of these were compulsory local licensing referendums, held in 1894 and then with each main parliamentary election between 1896 and 1914. Local licensing referendums were eliminated after 1914, apart from 'local restoration polls' to legalise liquor sales in 'dry' districts. In 1910 a referendum on national prohibition of alcohol was introduced, and held in conjunction with every general election from 1911 to 1987 inclusive (except 1931 and 1951). An extra referendum on prohibition was held on 10 April 1919. From 17 December 1919 the additional option of state purchase and control of liquor (ie nationalisation) was added to the ballot. The Sale of Liquor Act 1989 abolished the national liquor referendum. Local restoration polls were still held in areas that were still 'dry', but the last three, Mount Eden, Mount Roskill and Tawa, all became 'wet' in 1999. There have been two referendums on pub closing times.

Date	% Voters	Issue	Result
9 March 1949		Six o'clock closing	Three-to-one majority to retain
23 September 1967		Six o'clock closing	Two-to-one majority for later opening

Other referendums

The government may call referendums on any issues on which it wishes. These will usually be on issues on which the government is split. For the 1997 referendum on retirement savings, the decision to hold it was part of the coalition agreement between National and New Zealand First.

Date	% Voters	Issue	Result
9 March 1949	54.3	Allow off-course betting	68.0 % in favour
3 August 1949	63.5	Compulsory military training	77.9 % in favour
5 September 1997	80.3	Compulsory Retirement Savings Scheme	91.8% against

Citizens initiated referendums

The Citizens Initiated Referenda Act 1993 allows for citizens to propose a referendum. These are non-binding referendums on any issue in which proponents have submitted a petition to Parliament signed by 10% of all registered electors within 12 months. Based on the roll of the 2005 general election, organisers would need to gather 284,740 signatures at the average rate of 780 a day. It costs NZ$500 to file a petition asking for a referendum with the Clerk of the House of Representatives. The Clerk formally determines the wording of the question, which may be quite different from the original. The poll must be held within 12 months unless 75% of MPs vote to delay the poll for one year. There is also a $50,000 spending limit on promoting the petition.

New Zealand, Italy, and Switzerland are the only countries whose laws allow for citizen-initiated referendums (CIRs) nationally. Its defenders view it as a form of "direct democracy" However, the Citizens Initiated Referendum 1993 went against the advice of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System 1986. The Commission stated "In general, initiatives and referendums are blunt and crude devices.... [that] would blur the lines of accountability and responsibility of Governments".

A total of 33 petitions have been launched since 1993 on a wide range of topics.^{[citation needed]} Only three have come to a vote, because all the other proposals failed to gain enough signatures to force a referendum. The target number for signatures is the key to looking at the initiative proposed by citizens.

Firefighters

The first citizens initiated referendum was held on 2 December 1995. The question "Should the number of professional fire-fighters employed full-time in the New Zealand Fire Service be reduced below the number employed in 1 January 1995?" was unusual in that it aimed to elicit a "no" response. Turnout was low as the referendum was not held in conjunction with a general election, and the measure was voted down easily, with just over 12% voting "Yes" and almost 88% voting "No.^[3]

1999 election

At the 1999 election two referendums were put before voters. One was on whether the number of Members of Parliament should be reduced from 120 to 99. Electors overwhelmingly voted in favour of the proposal, with 81.47% voting for this proposal. However, there were no moves to amend the Electoral Act 1993 in line with this result until 2006 when a bill was introduced by New Zealand First MP Barbara Stewart to reduce the size of Parliament to 100. The bill passed its first reading by 61 votes to 60. It seems unlikely to pass into law as many parties stated they were supporting it only to Select Committee stage.

The other referendum held in 1999 asked "Should there be a reform of our Justice system placing greater emphasis on the needs of victims, providing restitution and compensation for them and imposing minimum sentences and hard labour for all serious violent offences?". This measure passed by 91.78%.

Criminalisation of Parental Corporal Punishment

Main article: New Zealand corporal punishment referendum, 2009

Following the submission of a petition on 22 August 2008, the Clerk of the House verified to parliament that the threshold for a CIR had been reached. Supporters said they would like it to be held with the 2008 election, however it will be a postal vote in August 2009.

This was the second attempt to collect enough signatures to force a referendum on the 2007 amendment of Section 59 of the Crimes Act, the "anti-smacking" law which removed the defence of "reasonable force" for a parent hitting their child, at the 2008 general election.^[4] However, when assessed by officials, a sample of 30,000 signatures revealed too many inconsistencies. This led officials to announce that the petition did not meet the threshold. Larry Baldock, a member of The Kiwi Party, replied that they had three months to resubmit the petition, and had collected 20,000 more signatures. He was also critical of the sample method, citing that statisticians apply an assessment of the sample which is extended to the entire petition. He believed that statistical error of that sample is not considered in their assessment.^[5]

Opponents of citizens initiated referendums

The perceived lack of implementation of successful referendums has led to calls for such referendums to be made binding on the government of the day, similar to the direct democracy said to exist in Switzerland. ACT New Zealand, Family First New Zealand, the Sensible Sentencing Trust and Kiwi Party all advocate binding referendums. However, Kiwi Party President Larry Baldock failed to submit enough signatures for a petition that might have led to a non-binding referendum on whether or not binding citizens referenda should be introduced after being granted permission to circulate a petition calling for that innovation, so the status quo remains.

By contrast, GayNZ.com has run articles strongly critical of the CIR lobby, as well as expressing concerns that CIRs could be abused to strip vulnerable minorities of their legislative protections, as has occurred frequently with referendums against same-sex marriage in the United States and similar proposals that target illegal immigrants in that country. In some New Zealand media outlets, the Minaret controversy in Switzerland has also been cited as one current example of anti-minoritarian abuse of the 'citizens' referendum process.^[6][7][8]

Even amongst conservative Christians, the issue has become contentious. The Maxim Institute has announced its opposition to binding citizens referendums, citing the adverse fiscal management consequences that have ensued in the state of California in a recent paper from Richard Ekins, a University of Auckland legal academic ^[9]

During 2009, there was additional criticism from prominent New Zealand legal academics, such as Andrew Geddis and Bridget Fenton at Otago University. They argue that CIRs are no substitute for more deliberative processes within the existing framework of representative democracy, such as joining political parties, protest marches, voting within general elections and parliamentary select committee submissions^[10] Current New Zealand Prime Minister John Key also opposes binding referendums on fiscal grounds, noting that California's contradictory tax cap and public spending referendums have made state fiscal management chaotic ^[11][12]

Table of petitions and referendums

The following table lists those petition questions lodged with Clerk of the House from 1993 to 2005.^[13]

Date proposal received by Clerk of the House	Sponsor / name of proposer	Question Proposed	Question Determined	Date determination of question gazetted	Date signatures to be collected by	Result of petition
1993	Royal New Zealand Society for the Protection of Cruelty to Animals		Should the production of eggs from battery hens be prohibited within five years of the referendum?
1993	Christian Heritage Party		Should a judge sentencing a person convicted of murder to life imprisonment be empowered to order that the person be imprisoned for his or her natural life and not be eligible for parole?
1993	Michael Laws MP, Hon Winston Peters MP, Geoff Braybrooke MP		Should the size of Parliament be reduced from 120 members of parliament to 100 by reducing the number elected from party list?
1 February 1994	Royal New Zealand Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals	Should the inhumane practice of battery egg production be phased out within five years from this referendum?	Should the production of eggs from battery hens be prohibited within five years of the referendum?	28 April 1994	28 April 1995	Petition lapsed
28 March 1994	Christian Heritage Party	Should a judge be given the power to decide whether life imprisonment for murder should mean a prisoner will be imprisoned for his/her natural life?	Should a Judge sentencing a person convicted of murder to life imprisonment be empowered to order that the person be imprisoned for his or her natural life and not be eligible for parole?	23 June 1994	23 June 1995	Petition lapsed
25 May 1994	Michael Laws MP, Hon Winston Peters MP, Geoff Braybrooke MP	Should the size of Parliament be reduced from 120 Members of Parliament to 100 by reducing the number of “list” MPs from 55 seats to 35 seats?	Should the size of Parliament be reduced from 120 Members of Parliament to 100 by reducing the number elected from the party list?	18 August 1994	18 August 1995	Petition lapsed
20 June 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	All New Zealanders should have access to a non-profit public health service which is fully government funded and without user charges.				Question withdrawn by proposer, on 16 September 1994
20 June 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	All new Zealanders should have access to non-profit education service that is fully government funded and without user charges, from pre-school to tertiary level.				Question withdrawn by proposer on 16 September 1994
20 June 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	The central goals of government economic policy should be full employment at liveable wages and, for those not in the paid workforce, an income based on what it actually costs to live.				Question withdrawn by proposer on 16 September 1994
20 June 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	New Zealand’s military budget should be reduced to half its 1994 level by the year 2000 and the savings allocated to health, education, employment and conservation.				Question withdrawn by proposer on 16 September 1994
20 June 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	The Employment Contracts Act should be replaced with laws that deliver pay equity and are consistent with the International Labour Organisation’s conventions and the United Nations’ International Bill of Human Rights.				Question withdrawn by proposer, on 16 September 1994
20 June 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	Any increase in New Zealand’s electricity demand should be met from energy conservation and from sources that are environmentally sustainable, and do not produce carbon dioxide (CO2).				Question withdrawn by proposer on 16 September 1994
29 August 1994	William Maung Maung	Do you want a Constitutional Enactment to enable the enforcement of political accountability?	Should there be a legally enforceable requirement that political parties observe their constitution and their manifesto promises?	17 November 1994	17 November 1995	Petition lapsed
11 November 1994	New Zealand Professional Fire-Fighters Union	Should the number of firefighters employed in the New Zealand Fire Service be reduced?	Should the number of professional fire fighters employed full time in the New Zealand Fire Service be reduced below the number employed on 1 January 1995?	9 February 1995	9 February 1996	Successful—presented to House on 30 May 1995; select committee report on 22 June 1995; referendum held on 2 December 1995. (27.0% turnout - 12.2% yes; 87.8% no)
30 November 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	Should all New Zealanders have access to public health services, which are fully government funded, and without user charges?	Should all New Zealanders have access to comprehensive health services, which are fully government funded, and without user charges?	23 February 1995	23 February 1996	Petition lapsed
30 November 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	Should all New Zealanders have access to public education services, from early childhood to tertiary level, which are fully government funded and without user charges?	Should all New Zealanders have access to public education services, from early childhood to tertiary level, which are fully government funded and without user charges?	23 February 1995	23 February 1996	Petition lapsed
30 November 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	Should full employment with wages and conditions that are fair and equitable be the central goal of government economic policy?	Should full employment with wages and conditions that are fair and equitable be the primary goal of government economic policy?	23 February 1995	23 February 1996	Petition lapsed
30 November 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	Should all New Zealanders on income support and benefits get an income based on what it actually costs to live?	Should all New Zealanders on income support and benefits get an income based on what it actually costs to live?	23 February 1995	23 February 1996	Petition lapsed
30 November 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	Should increases in New Zealand’s electricity demand be met from energy conservation and from the use of resources that are environmentally sustainable?	Should increases in New Zealand’s electricity demand be met from energy conservation and from the use of sources that are environmentally sustainable?	23 February 1995	23 February 1996	Not delivered to Clerk - lapsed
30 November 1994	Next Step Democracy Movement	Should New Zealand’s military budget be reduced to half its 1994/1995 level by the year 2000 with the savings spent on health, education, conservation and the promotion of full employment?	Should New Zealand’s defence expenditure be reduced to half its 1994/95 level by the year 2000 with the savings spent on health, education, conservation and the promotion of full employment?	23 February 1995	23 February 1996	Petition lapsed
19 December 1994	One New Zealand Foundation	Should the laws of New Zealand apply equally to all New Zealanders irrespective of ethnic origin?	Do you agree that the laws of New Zealand should not discriminate against or give preference to citizens or permanent residents of New Zealand on the basis of their ethnic origins?	23 March 1995	23 March 1996	Petition lapsed
15 September 1995	Companion and the Voluntary Euthanasia Society (Auckland) Inc	Should voluntary euthanasia be legalised for persons 18 years and older?	Should people aged 18 years and over who are terminally or incurably ill be permitted to have their lives ended if they request this, in a humane manner and in accordance with procedures to be established?	14 December 1995	14 December 1996	Withdrawn on 6 May 1996
15 April 1996	Jim Anderton MP	Should the Forestry Corporation’s plantation forests, mills, and rights in perpetuity to 188,000 hectares of Crown land, remain in New Zealand public ownership?	Should the forestry licenses to 188,000 hectares of Crown forest land which are currently held by the Forestry Corporation of New Zealand Limited remain in state ownership (subject to the determination of any Treaty of Waitangi claims)?	13 June 1996	13 June 1997	Petition lapsed
23 July 1996	Nga Kaitiaki o Te Waonuia Taane o Aotearoa	Should there be a law passed banning any further destruction of the native forests of Aotearoa to preserve the last remnants of our national heritage (pursuant to the Treaty of Waitangi)?	Should all tree felling and clearing on any indigenous land (except in plantation forests and already protected conservation areas be prohibited, unless such tree felling or cleaning is in accordance with Maori customary use?	31 October 1996	31 October 1997	Petition lapsed
17 March 1997	Mark Whyte	Should the Treaty of Waitangi, being an outdated document, be set aside and replaced with a national constitution which guarantees the equal rights of all New Zealanders without favour or discrimination?	Should there be a Written Constitution, taking precedence of the Treaty of Waitangi and all other sources of law, which guarantees the right of all people without favour or discrimination?	19 June 1997	19 June 1998	Petition lapsed
30 June 1997	Margaret Robertson	Should the size of Parliament be reduced from 120 members of Parliament to 99 members of Parliament by reducing the number elected from party lists?	Should the size of the House of Representatives be reduced from 120 members to 99 members?	21 August 1997	21 August 1998	Successful: presented to House on 17 February 1999; referendum held on 27 November 1999. (84.8% turnout - 81.5% yes; 18.5% no)
3 October 1997	Norm Withers	That should there be an urgent reform of our Justice system to introduce restorative justice which seeks to place greater emphasis on the needs of victims and includes hard labour for all serious violent offences?	Should there be a reform of our justice system placing greater emphasis on the needs of the victims, providing restitution and compensation for them and imposing minimum sentences and hard labour for all serious violent offences?	15 January 1998	15 January 1999	Successful -presented to House on 13 July 1999; referendum held on 27 November 1999. (84.8% turnout - 91.8% yes; 8.2% no)
13 October 1997	Cancer Society of New Zealand	That the Government should increase its annual spending on health services to at least 7% of GDP, funded if necessary from personal income tax.	Should the Government increase its annual spending on health services to at least 7% of GDP, funding the increase, if necessary, from personal income tax?	11 December 1997	11 December 1998	Petition lapsed
19 February 1998	Frederick Richards	Should the method of election be termination of the political party system with the election for the constituency candidate as representative by single transferable vote?	Should members of Parliament be elected by single transferable vote (STV) with constituency-based, multi-member electorates?	21 May 1998	21 May 1999	Petition lapsed
21 December 1998	Gavin Hugh Piercy	Should the Government stop any forced school closures until there have been full and transparent guidelines and procedures adapted by Parliament?	Should there be no further compulsory school closures until comprehensive criteria have been established by law for the Minister of Education to follow when deciding to close a school?	25 March 1999	25 March 2000	Petition lapsed
6 May 1999	Julie Waring	Do you support the request that the Government of New Zealand reduce the number of unemployed people to below 1% of the working population by the year 2004?	Should the government be required to reduce the number of unemployed people to below 1% of the labour force by the year 2004?	12 August 1999	12 August 2000	Petition lapsed
29 June 1999	The Free New Zealand Party Society Inc	Should government let New Zealanders have democracy by referendum where any individual or group can submit opinions which get numbered so we can list what we agree with and list what we disagree with, then the results are sent to four independent committees who create four separate laws and we vote for the most suitable one?	Should New Zealand adapt direct democracy by binding referendum whereby ideas for laws should be submitted and voted upon as of right by the public and, according to the result, submissions collected from the public and then assessed by opinion poll, resulting un draft law alternatives being prepared by independent groups, from which one opinion would be chosen by majority vote by the public; the resulting legislation to be binding?	14 October 1999	14 October 2000	Petition lapsed
1 January 2000	Stuart FE Marshall	Should the current review of the voting system be taken out of the hands of self-interested politicians by holding another binding referendum to decide the future voting systems, recognising the already clearly established public demand to reduce the number of MPs to 99?	Should a binding referendum be held to decide the future voting system, based on a parliament of 99 MPs?	20 March 2001	25 March 2002	Petition lapsed
27 March 2000	Raymond Lorenzen	Should the Government ban the sale and distribution of tobacco products?	Should Parliament enact legislation to ban the sale and distribution of tobacco?	6 July 2000	6 July 2001	Petition lapsed
18 May 2000	Tim Hawkins	Should Dr Newman's Shared Parenting Bill be made law in the Family Court?	Should the Shared Parenting Bill introduced by Dr Muriel Newman (which creates a presumption that parents who are separated or divorced will have equal rights to custody of their children) be passed by Parliament?	17 August 2000	17 August 2001	Petition lapsed
26 October 2000	Dennis Crisp	Do you believe that New Zealand should hold a binding referendum on whether we should replace MMP by a return to first-past-the-post elections?				Question withdrawn by promoter (between 2 and 8 November 2000)
26 July 2001	Ian Wishart on behalf of the Constitution Trust of New Zealand	Should New Zealand adopt a written constitution which protects fundamental human and civil rights and which transfers legal sovereignty from the Crown to the people?	Should New Zealand adopt a written constitution expressly vesting sovereignty in the people and protecting fundamental human and civil rights?	12 October 2001	22 October 2002	Petition lapsed
5 February 2003	Steve Baron (Better Democracy)	Should legislation be enacted to make Citizens Initiated Referenda binding on Government?	Should the law be amended to make the results of citizens initiated referenda binding on the New Zealand Government?	1 May 2003	1 May 2004	Petition withdrawn on 16 February 2004
3 April 2003	Dennis J Gates	Should our longstanding right of final appeal to the Privy Council in London be abolished?	Should all rights of appeal to the Privy Council be abolished?	2 July 2003	2 July 2004	Petition lapsed
29 August 2003	Larry Baldock MP and Gordon Copeland MP	That the Prostitution Law Reform Act 2003 be repealed?	Should the Prostitution Reform Act 2003 be repealed?	29 October 2003	29 October 2004	Petition lapsed
21 July 2004	NZ Flag.com Trust	Should New Zealand change its flag?	Should the design of the New Zealand flag be changed?	13 October 2004	13 October 2005	Withdrawn on 1 August 2005
10 January 2005	John van Buren	Should the proprietor of a licensed establishment be able to determine whether it is a smoke-free premise?	Should the proprietor of licensed premises be able to determine whether those premises are smoke-free?	6 April 2005	6 April 2006
21 February 2007	Sheryl Savill		Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?		22 August 2008	Petition successful - referendum held by postal ballot between 31 July to 21 August 2009. (56.09% turnout - 87.4% no; 11.98% yes)
17 December 2009	Larry Baldock		Should Parliament be required to pass legislation that implements the majority result of a citizens initiated referendum where that result supports a law change?[14]			Petition lapsed: 12 December 2010

The 1999 referendums were held in conjunction with the 1999 general election, which is likely to have played a role in the high proportion of voters.

Local government

Local government (regional councils, territorial councils and District Health Boards) may hold referendum on issues which they feel their citizens need to be consulted upon. Referendums have been held on water fluoridation, changing the electoral system to Single Transferable Vote and merging authorities together.

See also

• New Zealand elections
• Electoral system of New Zealand
• New Zealand constitution

References

1. ^ These exceptions include who can vote, how they vote (via secret ballot), how the country should be divided into electorates, and the make up of the Representation Commission which decides on these electorates. See section 268 of the Electoral Act 1993 for details.
2. ^ The section of the Electoral Act 1993 which establishes this restriction is not itself subject to it, so this requirement could, in theory, be circumvented by Parliament first repealing or amending the appropriate sections of the Electoral Act, and then modifying the term of Parliament directly. However this section has become seen as a constitutional convention, and so this would not be viewed as a legitimate tactic.
3. ^ "Return of Citizens Initiated Referendum Poll Votes" (PDF). Ministry of Justice. http://1995.electionresults.govt.nz/7.1%20Return%20of%20Citizens%20Initiated%20Referendum%20Poll%20Votes.pdf. 
4. ^ The Kiwi Party (21 February 2008). "300,000 and still counting!". Scoop.co.nz. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0802/S00268.htm. Retrieved 21 February 2008. 
5. ^ The Kiwi Party (29 April 2008). "Time for a Review of CIR". Scoop.co.nz. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0804/S00438.htm. Retrieved 30 April 2008. 
6. ^ "The case against Citizens Initiated Referenda". Gaynz.com. 5 November 2009. http://www.gaynz.com/articles/publish/31/article_8116.php. Retrieved 13 February 2011. 
7. ^ "Swiss ban mosque minarets in surprise vote". 3 News. Associated Press. 30 November 2009. http://www.3news.co.nz/Swiss-ban-mosque-minarets-in-surprise-vote/tabid/417/articleID/131865/cat/268/Default.aspx. Retrieved 5 November 2011. 
8. ^ Joanne Black: "Heidi Ho": New Zealand Listener: 12.12.09: 94
9. ^ Richard Ekins: "A Government for the People: The Value of Representative Democracy: http://www.maxim.org.nz/files/pdf/a_government_for_the_people.pdf
10. ^ Andrew Geddis and Bridget Fenton: "Citizens Initiated Referenda" New Zealand Law Journal (October 2009): 334-6
11. ^ "New Zealand's latest news, sport, entertainment, politics, business". 3 News. http://www.3news.co.nz/Binding-referenda-not-a-good-idea---Key/tabid/1235/articleID/130818/Cat/67/Default.aspx. Retrieved 13 February 2011. 
12. ^ Peter Schrag: "Take the Initiative, Please: Referenda Madness in California" American Prospect (01.09.96): http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=take_the_initiative_please
13. ^ "New Zealand". google.com. http://google.com/search?q=cache:AzDf6s0swxYJ:www.iri-asia.net/cms_file.php%3Fid%3D81%26dl%3D1+Republican+Movement+New+Zealand+referendum&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=nz&client=firefox-a. Retrieved 13 February 2011. 
14. ^ "CIR question approved by the Clerk". Scoop.co.nz. 17 December 2009. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0912/S00238.htm. Retrieved 9 February 2010. 

Further reading

• Atkinson, Neill. Adventures in Democracy: A History of the Vote in New Zealand. Dunedin: Otago University Press, 2003.
• Catt, Helena. "The Other Democratic Experiment: New Zealand’s Experience with Citizens’ Initiated Referendum." Political Science 48, no. 1 (1996): 29-47.
• Church, Stephen. "Crime and Punishment: The Referenda to Reform the Criminal Justice System and Reduce the Size of Parliament." In Left Turn: The New Zealand General Election of 1999, edited by Jonathan Boston, Stephen Church, Stephen Levine, Elizabeth McLeay and Nigel S. Roberts. Wellington: Victoria University Press, 2000.
• James, Colin. "Riding into Battle over Socially and Morally Divisive Bills." New Zealand Herald, 29 July 2003.
• Miller, R. ed. New Zealand Government and Politics 4th edition, 2006, OUP
• New Zealand Press Association. "Referendum Call on Māori Seats" The Dominion, 5 MAY 1999, 2.
• Palmer, Geoffrey, and Matthew Palmer. Bridled Power: New Zealand's Constitution and Government. fourth ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2004.
• Parkinson, John. "Who Knows Best? The Creation of the Citizen-Initiated Referendum in New Zealand." Government and Opposition 36, no. 3 ( 2001): 403 - 21.
• Prince, John D. "Look Back in Amber: The General Licensing Poll in New Zealand, 1919-87." Political Science 48, no. 1 (1996): 48-72.
• Simpson, Alan (editor), Referendums: Constitutional and Political Perspectives, Wellington: Occasional Publication No.5, Department of Politics, Victoria University of Wellington, 1992.
• The Political Economy of Six O’Clock Closing (in New Zealand) Tim Mulcare. (Rich Text Format)

Overseas references

• David Broder: Democracy Derailed: Initiative Campaigns and the Power of Money: Harvest Books: 2001.
• Richard Ellis: Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America: University of Kansas Press: 2002.
• Peter Schrag: Paradise Lost: California's Experience, America's Future? New York: New Press: 1998.

External links

• Organising New Zealand Referendums Online
• Elections NZ
• Campaign for Democracy
• Better Democracy
• Ministry of Justice
• Citizens Initiated Referenda Act 1993
• Referenda (Postal Voting) Act 2000