- Royal Commission on the Electoral System
The Royal Commission on the Electoral System was formed in
New Zealand in1985 , and reported in1986 . The decision to form theRoyal Commission was taken by the Fourth Labour government, after the Labour party had received more votes, yet won fewer seats than the National Party in both the 1978 and 1981 elections. The Royal Commission's report " [http://www.elections.org.nz/study/researchers/royal-commission-report-1986.html Towards a Better Democracy] " was instrumental in effecting New Zealand to change its electoral system fromfirst-past-the-post tomixed member proportional .Membership
The Royal Commission consisted of
# John Wallace (Chairman)
# John Darwin
#Kenneth Keith
#Richard Mulgan
#Whetumarama Wereta (Māori representative)Criteria
The Royal Commission established ten criteria for choosing an electoral system. The criteria were not weighed equally by the commission, and a balance was sought.
1. Fairness between political parties::The number of seats in the House should roughly reflect the number of votes received2. Effective representation of minority and special interest groups::The membership of Parliament should reflect the divisions of society3. Effective Māori representation::Māori should be fairly and effectively represented in House::Treaty of Waitangi & aboriginal rights should be respected4. Political Integration::All groups should respect views taken by others in society5. Effective representation of constituents::An electoral system should encourage close links and accountability to the community6. Effective voter participation::The voting system should be understandable::Power should be hands of voters to make/unmake governments7. Effective government::Governments should be able to act decisively and fulfil their responsibilities to their voters8. Effective Parliament::Parliament should be independent from government control::Parliament should be able to authorise spending and taxation as well as legislate9. Effective parties::Political parties should be formulating policy and providing representation10. Legitimacy::Fair and reasonable to the community
The Commission evaluated
first-past-the-post ,single transferable vote ,Supplementary Member ,Alternative Vote andmixed member proportional .Recommendations
# The Commission unanimously recommended the adoption of
mixed member proportional , with a threshold of 4% and that a referendum be held before or at the 1987 election.
# They also recommended that theMāori seats be abolished, with Māori parties instead receiving representation if they did not pass the threshold.
# That the number of MPs raise to 120 (although they considered 140 would be ideal, they realised that it would receive too much public backlash).
# The term of Parliament be raised to four years.
# The Commission recommended that Citizens' Initiated referendums "not" be implemented. However, they were in 1993.Implementation
In
1992 and1993 , two referendums were held, resulting in the adoption of MMP. The threshold was changed to 5% and the Māori seats were retained instead of allowing Māori parties to avoid the threshold. The number of MPs was increased to 120.A referendum was held on increasing the term of Parliament to four years in 1990. It failed to pass; Parliament continues operating under a three year term.
See also
*
Electoral reform in New Zealand
*Electoral system of New Zealand
* Royal Commission on the Electoral System, "Report of the Royal Commission on the Electoral System: Towards a Better Democracy", Wellington: Government Printers, 1986
*Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform (British Columbia) External links
* [http://www.elections.org.nz/study/researchers/royal-commission-report-1986.html Electronic copy of the Royal Commission's report]
* [http://www.elections.org.nz/study/history/history-mmp.html Elections New Zealand History of the Vote: From FPP to MMP]
* [http://www.mmp.org.nz Electoral Reform Coalition]
* [http://janda.org/c95/news%20articles/New%20Zealand/ZNswitch.htm New Zealand's Change to MMP by Paul Harris ]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.