 Michaelis–Menten kinetics

In biochemistry, Michaelis–Menten kinetics is one of the simplest and bestknown models of enzyme kinetics. It is named after German biochemist Leonor Michaelis and Canadian physician Maud Menten. The model takes the form of an equation describing the rate of enzymatic reactions, by relating reaction rate v to [S], the concentration of a substrate S. Its formula is given by
Here, V_{max } represents the maximum rate achieved by the system, at maximum (saturating) substrate concentrations. The Michaelis constant K_{m} is the substrate concentration at which the reaction rate is half of V_{max }. Biochemical reactions involving a single substrate are often assumed to follow Michaelis–Menten kinetics, without regard to the model's underlying assumptions.
Contents
Model
In 1903, French physical chemist Victor Henri found that enzyme reactions were initiated by a bond between the enzyme and the substrate.^{[1]} His work was taken up by German biochemist Leonor Michaelis and Canadian physician Maud Menten who investigated the kinetics of an enzymatic reaction mechanism, invertase, that catalyzes the hydrolysis of sucrose into glucose and fructose.^{[2]} In 1913, they proposed a mathematical model of the reaction.^{[3]} It involves an enzyme E binding to a substrate S to form a complex ES, which in turn is converted into a product P and the enzyme. This may be represented schematically as
where k_{f}, k_{r} and k_{cat} denote the rate constants,^{[4]} and the double arrows between S and ES represent the fact that enzymesubstrate binding is a reversible process.
Under certain assumptions – such as the enzyme concentration being much less than the substrate concentration – the rate of product formation is given by
The reaction rate increases with increasing substrate concentration [S], asymptotically approaching its maximum rate V_{max }, attained when all enzyme is bound to substrate. It also follows that V_{max } = k_{cat}[E]_{0}, where [E]_{0} is the enzyme concentration. k_{cat}, the turnover number, is maximum number of substrate molecules converted to product per enzyme molecule per second.
The Michaelis constant K_{m} is the substrate concentration at which the reaction rate is at halfmaximum, and is a measure of the substrate's affinity for the enzyme. A small K_{m} indicates high affinity, meaning that the rate will approach V_{max } more quickly.^{[5]}
The model is used in a variety of biochemical situations other than enzymesubstrate interaction, including antigenantibody binding, DNADNA hybridization and proteinprotein interaction.^{[5]}^{[6]} It can be used to characterise a generic biochemical reaction, in the same way that the Langmuir equation can be used to model generic adsorption of biomolecular species.^{[6]}
Applications
Parameter values vary wildly between enzymes:^{[7]}
Enzyme K_{m} (M) k_{cat} (1/s) k_{cat} / K_{m} (1/M.s) Chymotrypsin 1.5 × 10^{2} 0.14 9.3 Pepsin 3.0 × 10^{4} 0.50 1.7 × 10^{3} TyrosyltRNA synthetase 9.0 × 10^{4} 7.6 8.4 × 10^{3} Ribonuclease 7.9 × 10^{3} 7.9 × 10^{2} 1.0 × 10^{5} Carbonic anhydrase 2.6 × 10^{2} 4.0 × 10^{5} 1.5 × 10^{7} Fumarase 5.0 × 10^{6} 8.0 × 10^{2} 1.6 × 10^{8} The constant k_{cat} / K_{m} is a measure of how efficiently an enzyme converts a substrate into product. It has a theoretical upper limit of 10^{8} – 10^{10} /M.s; enzymes working close to this, such as fumarase, are termed superefficient.^{[8]}
MichaelisMenten kinetics have also been applied to a variety of spheres outside of biochemical reactions,^{[4]} including alveolar clearance of dusts,^{[9]} the richness of species pools,^{[10]} clearance of blood alcohol,^{[11]} the photosynthesisirradiance relationship and bacterial phage infection.^{[12]}
Derivation
Applying the law of mass action, which states that the rate of a reaction is proportional to the product of the concentrations of the reactants, gives a system of four nonlinear ordinary differential equations that define the rate of change of reactants with time t:^{[13]}
In this mechanism, the enzyme E is a catalyst, which only facilitates the reaction, so its total concentration, free plus combined, [E] + [ES] = [E]_{0} is a constant. This conservation law can also be obtained by adding the second and third equations above.^{[13]}^{[14]}
Equilibrium approximation
In their original analysis, Michaelis and Menten assumed that the substrate is in instantaneous chemical equilibrium with the complex, and thus k_{f}[E][S] = k_{r}[ES].^{[3]}^{[14]} Combining this relationship with the enzyme conservation law, the concentration of complex is^{[14]}
where K_{d} = k_{r} / k_{f} is the dissociation constant for the enzymesubstrate complex. Hence the velocity v of the reaction – the rate at which P is formed – is^{[14]}
where V_{max } = k_{cat}[E]_{0} is the maximum reaction velocity.
Quasisteadystate approximation
An alternative analysis of the system was undertaken by British botanist G. E. Briggs and British geneticist J. B. S. Haldane in 1925.^{[15]} They assumed that the concentration of the intermediate complex does not change on the timescale of product formation – known as the quasisteadystate assumption or pseudosteadystatehypothesis. Mathematically, this assumption means k_{f}[E][S] = k_{r}[ES] + k_{cat}[ES]. Combining this relationship with the enzyme conservation law, the concentration of complex is^{[14]}
where
is known as the Michaelis constant. Hence the velocity v of the reaction is^{[14]}
Assumptions and limitations
The first step in the derivation applies the law of mass action, which is reliant on free diffusion. However, in the environment of a living cell where there is a high concentration of protein, the cytoplasm often behaves more like a gel than a liquid, limiting molecular movements and altering reaction rates.^{[16]} Whilst the law of mass action can be valid in heterogeneous environments,^{[17]} it is more appropriate to model the cytoplasm as a fractal, in order to capture its limitedmobility kinetics.^{[18]}
The resulting reaction rates predicted by the two approaches are similar, with the only difference being that the equilibrium approximation defines the constant as K_{d}, whilst the quasisteadystate approximation uses K_{m}. However, each approach is founded upon a different assumption. The MichaelisMenten equilibrium analysis is valid if the substrate reaches equilibrium on a much faster timescale than the product is formed or, more precisely, that ^{[14]}
By contrast, the BriggsHaldane quasisteadystate analysis is valid if ^{[13]}^{[19]}
Thus it holds if the enzyme concentration is much less than the substrate concentration. Even if this is not satisfied, the approximation is valid if K_{m} is large.
In both the MichaelisMenten and BriggsHaldane analyses, the quality of the approximation improves as decreases. However, in model building, MichaelisMenten kinetics are often invoked without regard to the underlying assumptions.^{[14]}
Determination of constants
The typical method for determining the constants V_{max } and K_{m} involves running a series of enzyme assays at varying substrate concentrations [S], and measuring the initial reaction rate v_{0}. 'Initial' here is taken to mean that the reaction rate is measured after a relatively short time period, during which it is assumed that the enzymesubstrate complex has formed, but that the substrate concentration held approximately constant, and so the equilibrium or quasisteadystate approximation remain valid.^{[19]} By plotting reaction rate against concentration, and using nonlinear regression of the MichaelisMenten equation, the parameters may be obtained.^{[20]}
Before computing facilities to perform nonlinear regression became available, graphical methods involving linearisation of the equation were used. A number of these were proposed, including the Eadie–Hofstee diagram, Hanes–Woolf plot and Lineweaver–Burk plot; of these, the HanesWoolf plot is the most accurate.^{[20]} However, while useful for visualization, all three methods distort the error structure of the data and are inferior to nonlinear regression.^{[21]} Nonetheless, their use can still be found in modern literature.^{[22]}
References
 ^ Henri, Victor (1903). Lois Générales de l’Action des Diastases. Paris: Hermann. Google books (US only)
 ^ "Victor Henri". Whonamedit?. http://www.whonamedit.com/doctor.cfm/2881.html. Retrieved 24 May 2011.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Menten, L.; Michaelis, M.I. (1913), "Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung", Biochem Z 49: 333–369 (recent translation, and an older partial translation)
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Chen, W.W.; Neipel, M.; Sorger, P.K. (2010). "Classic and contemporary approaches to modeling biochemical reactions". Genes Dev 24 (17): 1861–1875. doi:10.1101/gad.1945410. PMC 2932968. PMID 20810646. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2932968.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Lehninger, A.L.; Nelson, D.L.; Cox, M.M. (2005). Lehninger principles of biochemistry. New York: W.H. Freeman. ISBN 9780716743392.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Chakraborty, S. (23 Dec 2009). Microfluidics and Microfabrication (1 ed.). Springer. ISBN 9781441915429.
 ^ Mathews, C.K.; van Holde, K.E.; Ahern, K.G. (10 Dec 1999). Biochemistry (3 ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780805330663. http://www.pearsonhighered.com/mathews/.
 ^ Stroppolo, M.E.; Falconi, M.; Caccuri, A.M.; Desideri, A. (Sep 2001). "Superefficient enzymes". Cell Mol Life Sci 58 (10): 1451–60. doi:10.1007/PL00000788. PMID 11693526.
 ^ Yu, R.C.; Rappaport, S.M. (1997). "A lung retention model based on MichaelisMentenlike kinetics". Environ Health Perspect 105 (5): 496–503. doi:10.1289/ehp.97105496. PMC 1469867. PMID 9222134. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1469867.
 ^ Keating, K.A.; Quinn, J.F. (1998). "Estimating species richness: the MichaelisMenten model revisited". Oikos 81 (2): 411–416. doi:10.2307/3547060. JSTOR 3547060.
 ^ Jones, A.W. (2010). "Evidencebased survey of the elimination rates of ethanol from blood with applications in forensic casework". Forensic Sci Int 200 (1–3): 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.021. PMID 20304569.
 ^ Abedon, S.T. (2009). "Kinetics of phagemediated biocontrol of bacteria". Foodborne Pathog Dis 6 (7): 807–15. doi:10.1089/fpd.2008.0242. PMID 19459758.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} Murray, J.D. (2002). Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction (3 ed.). Springer. ISBN 9780387952239.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} ^{c} ^{d} ^{e} ^{f} ^{g} ^{h} Keener, J.; Sneyd, J. (2008). Mathematical Physiology: I: Cellular Physiology (2 ed.). Springer. ISBN 9780387758466.
 ^ Briggs, G.E.; Haldane, J.B.S. (1925). "A note on the kinematics of enzyme action". Biochem J 19 (2): 338–339. PMC 1259181. PMID 16743508. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1259181.
 ^ Zhou, H.X.; Rivas, G.; Minton, A.P. (2008). "Macromolecular crowding and confinement: biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences". Annu Rev Biophys 37: 375–97. doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125817. PMC 2826134. PMID 18573087. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2826134.
 ^ Grima, R.; Schnell, S. (Oct 2006). "A systematic investigation of the rate laws valid in intracellular environments". Biophys Chem 124 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2006.04.019. PMID 16781049.
 ^ Schnell, S.; Turner, T.E. (2004). "Reaction kinetics in intracellular environments with macromolecular crowding: simulations and rate laws". Prog Biophys Mol Biol 85 (2–3): 235–60. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.01.012. PMID 15142746.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Segel, L.A.; Slemrod, M. (1989). "The quasisteadystate assumption: A case study in perturbation". Thermochim Acta 31 (3): 446–477. doi:10.1137/1031091.
 ^ ^{a} ^{b} Leskovac, V. (2003). Comprehensive enzyme kinetics. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Pub.. ISBN 9780306467127.
 ^ Greco, W.R.; Hakala, M.T. (1979). "Evaluation of methods for estimating the dissociation constant of tight binding enzyme inhibitors,". J Biol Chem 254 (23): 12104–12109. PMID 500698.
 ^ Hayakawa, K.; Guo, L.; Terentyeva, E.A.; Li, X.K.; Kimura, H.; Hirano, M.; Yoshikawa, K.; Nagamine, T. et al. (2006). "Determination of specific activities and kinetic constants of biotinidase and lipoamidase in LEW rat and Lactobacillus casei (Shirota)". J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 844 (2): 240–50. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.07.006. PMID 16876490.
Further reading
Proteins: enzymes Topics Active site · Allosteric regulation · Binding site · Catalytically perfect enzyme · Coenzyme · Cofactor · Cooperativity · EC number · Enzyme catalysis · Enzyme inhibitor · Enzyme kinetics · Lineweaver–Burk plot · Michaelis–Menten kinetics · List of enzymesTypes EC1 Oxidoreductases/list · EC2 Transferases/list · EC3 Hydrolases/list · EC4 Lyases/list · EC5 Isomerases/list · EC6 Ligases/listCategories: Enzyme kinetics
 Chemical kinetics
 Ordinary differential equations
 Catalysis
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.