Opus number

An Opus number (Latin sing. "work", "labour", a work of art, 1695–1705), pl. opera and opuses, abbreviated, sing. Op. and pl. Opp.^[1][2] refers to a number generally assigned by composers to an individual composition or set of compositions on publication, to help identify their works. Opus numbers have been used inconsistently throughout history and by individual composers, and thus are not generally a good indicator of the chronological order of the compositions or the relative completeness of a given collection. Opus numbers are commonly used to organise catalogues of musical compositions. The Latin plural, opera, also denotes the opera music genre, wherein the works also are (occasionally) identified with a musical composition opus number, as in the grand opera Samson and Delilah, Op. 47, by Camille Saint-Saëns.

Early usage

In the arts, opus number usually denotes a work of musical composition, a practice and usage established in the seventeenth century when composers identified their works with an opus number. In the nineteenth century, publishers usually assigned opus numbers when publishing groups of like compositions, usually in sets of three-, six-, and twelve compositions. Consequently, opus numbers are not usually in chronological order, unpublished compositions usually had no opus number, and numeration gaps and sequential duplications occurred when publishers issued contemporaneous editions of a composer’s works, as in the sets of string quartets by Joseph Haydn (1732–1809) and Ludwig van Beethoven (1770–1827); Haydn’s Op. 76, the Erdödy quartets (1796–97), comprises six discrete quartets consecutively numbered Op. 76 No. 1 – Op. 76 No. 6; whilst Beethoven’s Op. 59, the Rasumovsky quartets (1805–06), comprises String Quartet No. 7, String Quartet No. 8, and String Quartet No. 9.

19th century to date

From about 1800, composers, especially Ludwig van Beethoven, assigned an opus number to a work, and later to a set of works, especially songs and short piano pieces; however, composers’ inconsistent usages ended the correspondence between an opus number and the work’s publication date. Since approximately 1900, composers tended to assign an opus number to a composition, published or not. Early in his career, Beethoven selectively enumerated his compositions (some published without opus numbers), yet in later years, he published early works with high opus numbers. Likewise, some posthumously published works were given high opus numbers by publishers, even though some of them were written early in Beethoven's career. Since his death in 1827, the un-numbered compositions have been catalogued and labelled with the German acronym WoO (Werk ohne Opuszahl), meaning "work without opus number". However, there are other catalogues of Beethoven's works - see Catalogues of Beethoven compositions.

The practice of enumerating a posthumous opus (Op. posth.) is noteworthy in the case of Felix Mendelssohn (1809–47); after his death, the heirs published many compositions with opus numbers Mendelssohn did not assign them. In life, he published three symphonies, Symphony No. 1 in C minor, Op. 11; Symphony No. 2 in B flat major, Op. 52; and Symphony No. 3 in A minor, Op. 56, yet, he chronologically wrote symphonies between symphonies Nos. 1 and 2, which he withdrew for personal and compositional reasons; nevertheless, the Mendelssohn heirs published (and catalogued) them as the Italian Symphony No. 4 in A major, Op. 90 and as the Reformation Symphony No. 5 in D major and D minor, Op. 107.

Examples of composers’ historically-inconsistent opus number usages include the cases of César Franck (1822–1890) and Béla Bartók (1881–1945) who initially enumerated, but then discontinued enumerating, their compositions. Carl Nielsen (1865–1931) and Paul Hindemith (1895–1963) were also inconsistent in their approaches. Moreover, Sergei Prokofiev (1891–1953) was a consistent enumerator who assigned an opus number to a composition before composing it; at his death he left fragmentary and planned — but numbered — works. In revising a composition, Prokofiev occasionally assigned a new opus number to the revision, thus: Symphony No. 4 is two, thematically-related, but discrete works: (i) Symphony No. 4, Op. 47, and (ii) Symphony No. 4, Op. 112; the former, Op. 47, was written in 1929; the latter, Op. 112, is a large-scale revision written in 1947. Like-wise, depending upon the edition, the original version of Piano Sonata No. 5 in C major, is twice catalogued as: (i) Piano Sonata No. 5, Op. 38, and as (ii) Piano Sonata No. 5, Op. 135.

Catalogues

To supersede composers’ inconsistent opus number usage, especially by those of the baroque and classical eras, musicologists have definitively and unambiguously catalogued them via thematic catalogue abbreviations.

• The works of Carl Friedrich Abel, usually catalogued by original publication opus numbers, e.g. the Op. 17 symphonies have different catalogue opus numbers Walter Knape assigned them in the Bibliographisch-thematisches Verzeichnis der Kompositionen von Karl Friedrich Abel (Bibliographic–Thematic Catalogue of the Compositions of Karl Friedrich Abel), published by Cuxhaven, in 1972.

• Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach's works are indexed with two opus number systems: (i) the older Wotquenne (Wq.) numbering system, established by Alfred Wotquenne, in a catalogue of Emanuel’s music, in 1905; and (ii) the complete H. opus number system by E. Eugene Helm, used in the Thematic Catalogue of the Works of C.P.E. Bach (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989).

• Johann Christian Bach's works are mostly referred to by the original-publisher’s assigned opus number, which can cause mis-identifications, because different, secondary publishers used the same (original) opus number, such as using Op. 18 to identify three different sets of J. C. Bach works: (i) “Six Grand Overtures”, (ii) “Deux sinfonies”, and (iii) “Four Sonatas and Two Duets”. Moreover, three of six Op. 6 symphonies are identified as Op. 8, but in a different order. Because of said confusion, the de facto standard catalogue is John Christian Bach, by C. S. Terry (2nd ed. 1967), for identifying a J. C. Bach work, one cites the page and incipit numbers “in Terry”, although they are not catalogue numbers. Moreover, a short list of the Terry numbers is in The New Grove Bach Family, by Christoph Wolff, et al. (pp. 341ff., NY: Norton, 1983). Also used are the opus numbers of the “Thematic Catalog” in the Collected Works of Johann Christian Bach (Ernest Warburton, ed.; NY: Garland Publishing, 1985).

• Johann Sebastian Bach's works are referred to by BWV (Bach-Werke-Verzeichnis) opus number assigned in the catalogue by Wolfgang Schmieder.

• Wilhelm Friedemann Bach's works were catalogued by Martin Falck in 1913; a work is identified by its F (Falck) opus number.

• Béla Bartók's works are designated by numbering systems developed by three different catalogers. The most frequently-used is the chronological "Sz." system created by András Szőllősy.

• Luigi Boccherini's works are referred to by "G" numbers, following the catalogue of Yves Gérard.

• Dieterich Buxtehude's works are referred to by their Buxtehude-Werke-Verzeichnis numbers, abbreviated BuxWV, after the catalogue published by Georg Karstädt.

• Marc-Antoine Charpentier's works are referred to by the H or Hitchcock numbers after H. Wiley Hitchcock.

• Claude Debussy's works are usually referred to by the L or Lesure numbers after François Lesure, as Debussy didn't use Opus numbers, except for his String Quartet, labeled Opus 10.

• Antonín Dvořák's works are usually now referenced by B numbers, after Jarmil Burghauser's comprehensive catalogue which resolved a great many difficulties with the often misleading and duplicated opus numbers given by different publishers to Dvořák's works.

• César Franck's works are usually now referred to by M numbers or FWV numbers, although he did allocate opus numbers to some early compositions. M and FWV refer to the catalogue created by Wilhelm Mohr, which he himself called Franck-Werke-Verzeichnis

• George Frideric Handel's works are often designated by HWV (Händel-Werke-Verzeichnis) numbers as allocated by Bernd Baselt. Many of Handel's works are still commonly referred to using the traditional Opus numbers as designated during original publication. For more details, see the List of compositions by George Frideric Handel.

• Joseph Haydn's works are referred to by their Hob or Hoboken numbers after Anthony van Hoboken's 1957 classification. Hoboken assigned numbers to the string quartets, but these are generally still known by their opus numbers.

• Franz Liszt's works are referred to by their S or Searle numbers after Humphrey Searle's 1960s classification The Music of Liszt. Alternatively, R is used to refer to Peter Raabe's 1931 reference Franz Liszt: Leben und Schaffen. See List of compositions by Franz Liszt (S.1–S.350) and List of compositions by Franz Liszt (S.351–S.999).

• Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart's opus numbers are particularly scattered and useless and are no longer used at all (for instance, there are two sets of violin sonatas both called Op. 1). His works are always referred to by their K or Köchel numbers, after Ludwig Ritter von Köchel. In continental Europe, the German abbreviation "KV" for Köchel-Verzeichnis is more common; see that entry for an explanation of the differing K numbers found between the first and subsequent editions of Köchel's catalog. See also: List of compositions by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

• Antonio Rosetti's works are usually given with catalog numbers by Sterling E. Murray, Chairman of the Department of Music History at West Chester University of Pennsylvania,[1] although older numbers from Oskar Kaul's 1912 Rosetti catalog sometimes appear as well. For example, Rosetti's popular "La Chasse" symphony is numbered as "Murray A20/Kaul I:18."

• Domenico Scarlatti's harpsichord works have two major numbering systems: the L or Longo numbers after Alessandro Longo's edition for piano, and the K or Kirkpatrick numbers after Ralph Kirkpatrick's facsimile edition (K is sometimes written as Kk to distinguish it from Köchel numbers - see Mozart above). A newer ordering, by Giorgio Pestelli, has led to P numbers appearing in some places. For a full concordance between these three systems, see List of solo keyboard sonatas by Domenico Scarlatti.

• Franz Schubert's works are referred to by their D or Deutsch numbers after Otto Erich Deutsch's catalogue. Schubert's opus numbers are very scattered, unchronological, and mostly posthumous, but a few of them are occasionally seen. See Schubert compositions D number 1-500 and Schubert compositions D number 501-998.

• Antonio Soler's keyboard sonatas are usually referred to by their R number, after the catalogue compiled by Father Samuel Rubio.

• Antonio Vivaldi's works are referred to by their RV or Ryom-Verzeichnis numbers after Peter Ryom's catalogue. Some of his works were published in opus sets, and these numbers are often still used as well.

• Richard Wagner's works are referred to by their WWV or Wagner-Werke-Verzeichnis numbers, which also include his non-musical work.

• Carl Maria von Weber's works may appear by opus or by J. number, the latter referring to Friedrich Wilhelm Jähns, Carl Maria von Weber in Seinen Werken: Chronologisch-Thematisches Verzeichnis Seiner Sämmtlichen Compositionen (1871). A list of Weber's works in order of Jähns catalogue number can be found at List of compositions by Carl Maria von Weber.

• In a parody of catalogue numbering, the works of P. D. Q. Bach are assigned "Schickele" numbers, after Peter Schickele, the works' sole discoverer (and, in reality, their composer). Schickele numbers are not sequential but are intended as jokes (a Christmas work is S.359 because 25 December is the 359th day of the (non-leap) year).

References

1. ^ opus, n. (June 2008). The Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 31 August 2009 <http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/00333025>.
2. ^ opus. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edition.