- History of the Royal Australian Navy
The History of the Royal Australian Navy can be traced back to 1788 and the colonisation of Australia by the British. During the period until 1859, vessels of the Royal Navy made frequent trips to the new colonies. In 1859, the Australia Squadron was formed as a separate squadron and remained in Australia until 1913. During the period before Federation, each of the six Australian colonies operated their own colonial naval force; these amalgamated in 1901 as the Commonwealth Naval Force. The Royal Australian Navy (RAN) was established in 1911, and in 1913 the fleet steamed through
Sydney Headsfor the first time.
The Royal Australian Navy has seen action in every ocean of the world during its short life. The RAN first saw action in
World War I, and distinguished itself in three oceans. Between the wars the RANs fortunes shifted with the financial situation of Australia: experiencing great growth during the 1920s, but forced to shrink in the 1930s. Entering World War IIthe RAN was not in the situation it was in 1914. During the war the size of the RAN grew to over 300 vessels of virtually all classes. After World War II the RAN saw action in Korea, Vietnam, and other smaller conflicts. Today the RAN fields a small but modern force, widely regarded as one of the most powerful forces in the Asia Pacific Region.
From the colonisation of Australia in 1788 until 1859, the
blue waterdefence of Australia was provided by detached units of the Royal Navy's East Asia Squadron, based in Sydney. In 1859, Australia was established as a separate Royal Navy squadron; this marked the first occasion the Royal Navy ships had been permanently stationed in Australia. The Royal Navy's Australia Squadron remained the primary naval force in Australian waters until 1913, when the Royal Navy's Australia Station ceased and responsibility handed over to the Royal Australian Navy and its Sydney based depots, dockyards and structures were gifted to the Australian commonwealth.
Prior to Federation five of the six self-governing colony in Australia operated their own Colonial navies. Western Australia did not have a Colonial Naval force. The colonial navies were expanded greatly in the mid-1880s and usually consisted of gunboats and torpedo-boats for coastal defence of harbours and rivers, and naval brigades to man vessels and forts. In 1856, Victoria received its own naval vessel, HMCSS "Victoria", which in 1860 was deployed to assist the New Zealand colonial government during the first
Taranaki Maori war. When "Victoria" returned to Australia, the vessel had taken part in several minor actions, with the loss on one crewmember. The deployment of "Victoria" to New Zealand marked the first occasion that an Australian warship had been deployed overseas. In the years leading up to Federation, Colonial Victoria became the most powerful of all the colonial navies. Victoria had HMVS "Cerberus" since 1870, as well as HMVS "Nelson", three small gunboats and five torpedo-boats. NSW had two very small torpedo-boats, and the corvette "Wolverine". After Federation all colonial vessels became part of the Commonwealth Naval Force. [cite web |url=http://www.gunplot.net/colonialnavy/colonialnavy1.html |title=Colonial Navies of Early Australia |accessdaymonth=23 August |accessyear=2008] [Australian Naval Reserves by John M Wilkins RFD*Verify source|date=August 2008]
Federation of Australiain 1901, the Commonwealth Naval Forces was formed on 1 March 1901 by amalgamating the six separate colonial navies. The Commonwealth government, however, paid for the Royal Navy to continue providing blue water defence.
A growing number of people, among them Captain
William Rooke Creswell, the director of the Commonwealth Naval Forces, demanded an autonomous Australian navy, financed and controlled by Australia. In 1909 Prime Minister Alfred Deakinand Creswell, while attending the Imperial Conference in London, sought the British Government's agreement to end the subsidy system and develop an Australian navy. The Admiraltyrejected and resented the challenge, but suggested diplomatically that a small fleet of destroyers and submarines would be sufficient. Deakin was not impressed with the Admiralty, and in 1908 invited the United States Great White Fleetto visit Australia. The visit prompted public enthusiasm for a modern navy and led to the order of two 700-ton "River" class destroyers, a purchase that angered the British. The surge in German naval construction in 1909 led the Admiralty to change their position on an Australian navy. For his work, Creswell's name lives on as the name of the naval base, HMAS "Creswell", the site of the Royal Australian Naval Collegeat Jervis Bay. [Macdougall Pg. 23]
The first Australian warship, the destroyer HMAS "Parramatta", was launched at
Govanin Scotland on Wednesday 9 February 1910. Her sister ship, HMAS "Yarra", was launched at Dumbartonin Scotland on Saturday 9 April 1910. Both ships were commissioned into the Royal Navy on Monday 19 September 1910 and sailed for Australia. They arrived at Port Phillipon Saturday 10 December 1910, an event that was marred by the death of Engineer Lieutenant W. Robertson, RN. Robertson suffered a heart attack convert|8|mi|km|0 outside Port Phillip Heads whilst onboard HMAS "Yarra", and drowned. [ [http://www.brightoncemetery.com/HistoricInterments/Crimes/robertsonw.htm "Death of a Bluejacket"] Accessed on 24 September 2007]
On 10 July 1911 King George V fixed his signature to the approval for the Royal Australian Navy and the ships now officially received the prefix "
His Majesty's Australian Ship" (HMAS). The manpower of the fleet stood at four hundred officers and men and, for the next two years, ships were built for the fledgling navy. On Saturday 4 October 1913 the first Fleet Review of the Royal Australian Navy took place, the battle cruiser HMAS "Australia", the cruisers HMAS "Melbourne" and HMAS "Sydney", the protected cruiser HMAS "Encounter" and the torpedo-boat destroyers "Parramatta", "Yarra" and "Warrego", entered Sydney Harbour.
Imperial Conferenceof 1911, it was decided that in the event of war the ships of the RAN would be transferred to British Admiralty control. Under the "Naval Defence Act" (1912) the power to make the transfer was conferred in the Governor General. The RAN would become the Australia Squadron of the Royal Navywith all ships and personnel under the direct control of the Admiralty, while the RAN remained responsible for the upkeep of the ships and training.
World War I
On 3 August 1914, as the prospect of war with the
German Empireloomed, the Australian Government sent the following message to the Admiralty. [ [http://www.awm.gov.au/cms_images/histories/10/chapters/01.pdf Official History of Australia in the War of 1914 – 1918 Volume XI Chapter 1] ] quote|In the event of war Government prepared place vessels of Australian Navy under control British Admiralty when desired. The United Kingdom declared war on Germany the next day, and on 8 August, the Ustralian Government received a reply, requesting that the transfer be made immediately, if not already done. On 10 August, the Governor General officially transferred control of the RAN to the Admiralty, which would retain control until 19 August 1919. [ [http://www.awm.gov.au/cms_images/histories/10/chapters/41.pdf Official History of Australia in the War of 1914 – 1918 Volume XI Chapter 1 Appendix 27] ] Two days later,
At the outbreak of war, the
Royal Australian Navy(RAN) consisted of "Australia", the light cruisers "Sydney" and "Melbourne" , the destroyers "Parramatta", "Yarra" and "Warrego" and the submarines "AE1" and "AE2". The light cruiser "Brisbane" and three destroyers were under construction, and a small fleet of auxiliary ships was being maintained by the RAN. The Royal Australian Navy at the start of the war was a formidable force. [Official History of Australia in the War of 1914-1918 Volume IX]
Australian ships first saw action Asian and Pacific theatre; assisting in the attack on
German New Guineaby the Australian Naval and Military Expeditionary Force(AN&MEF). Germany had colonised the northeastern part of New Guineaand several nearby island groups in 1884, and the colony was currently used as a wireless radio base, Britain required the wireless installations to be destroyed because they were used by the German East Asia Squadronwhich threatened merchant shipping in the region. The objectives of the force were the German stations at Yapin the Caroline Islands, Nauru, and Rabaulin New Britain. On 30 August 1914, the AN&MEF left Sydney under the protection of HMA Ships "Australia" and "Melbourne" for Port Moresby, where the force met the Queensland contingent, aboard the transport HMAHS "Kanowna". The force then sailed for German New Guinea on 7 September, leaving "Kanowna" behind when her stokers refused to work. HMAS "Sydney" and her escorting destroyers met the AN&MEF off the eastern tip of New Guinea. "Melbourne" was detached to destroy the wireless station on Nauru, while on 14 September, "Encounter" bombarded a ridge near Rabaul,Verify source|date=August 2008 while half a battalion advanced towards the town. The only major loss of the campaign was the disappearance of the "AE1" during a patrol off Rabaul on 14 September 1914. [Official History of Australia in the War of 1914-1918 Vol. X: The Australians at Rabaul, S.S. Mackenzie, 1927] [Burnellclarifyme]
On 9 November 1914, the German light cruiser SMS "Emden" attacked the Allied radio and telegraph station at
Direction Islandin the Cocos (Keeling) Islands. The inhabitants of the island managed to transmit a distress signal, which was received by "Sydney", only convert|50|mi|km|-1 away. "Sydney" arrived within two hours, and was engaged by "Emden". "Sydney" was the larger, faster and better armed of the two, and eventually overpowered "Emden", with captain Karl von Müllerrunning the ship aground on North Keeling Islandat 11:15 am. At first, "Emden" refused to strike its colours and surrender; "Sydney" fired on the stationary "Emden" until it eventually struck its colours. The Battle of Cocoswas the first ship-against-ship engagement for the Royal Australian Navy. [ [http://www.ezania.net/library/books/cocos/index_contents.htm www.ezania.net] Accessed August 20, 2006]
On 6 February 1915, the obsolescent light cruiser HMAS "Pioneer" joined the East African campaign. On 6 July, she engaged the German cruiser SMS "Königsberg" and German shore batteries, during the
Battle of Rufiji Delta. "Pioneer" remained off East Africa and took part in many bombardments of German East Africa, including Dar-es-Salaamon 13 June, 1916. "Pioneer" then returned to Australia, to be decommissioned in October 1916.
Naval operations in the Dardanelles Campaignthe Australian submarine "AE2" became the first Allied warship to breach the Turkish defences of the Dardanelles. "AE2" spent five days in the area, was unsuccessfully attacked several times, but was unable to find any large enemy troop transports. On 29 April 1915, she was damaged in an attack by the Turkish torpedo-boat "Sultan Hisar" in Artaki Bay and was scuttled by her crew. The wreck of "AE2" remained undiscovered until 2 July 1998, 83 years after she was scuttled. [ [http://www.divernet.com/wrecks/ae21199.htm The sub that shaped Gallipoli] Accessed 20 August 2006]
Ships of the Royal Australian Navy also assisted the
Royal Navyin the blockade of the German High Seas Fleet. HMAS "Australia" was the flagship of the 2nd Battle Cruiser Squadron and was to take part in the Battle of Jutland. Australia was forced to miss the battle after she collided with her sister ship HMS "New Zealand" on 22 April 1916. The collision damage meant that "Australia" did not return to service until 9 June 1916. Three vessels of the Royal Australian Navy were present during the surrender of the German High Seas Fleet; HMA Ships "Australia", "Sydney", and "Melbourne", with "Australia" leading the 2nd Battle Cruiser Squadron during the surrender. The RAN's only two losses during the war were the submarines "AE1" and "AE2". [cite web |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/HMAS_Australia_%28I%29 |title=HMAS Australia I |accessdaymonth=23 August |accessyear=2008 |work=HMA Ship Histories |publisher=Sea Power Centre - Royal Australian Navy] [Official History of Australia in the War of 1914-1918 Vol. IX The Royal Australian Navy, 1914 – 1918]
The 1918-19 influenza pandemic
Between April 1918 and May 1919, the
Spanish Flukilled an estimated 25 million people worldwide, far more than had been killed in four years of war. A rigorous quarantine policy was implemented in Australia; although this reduced the immediate impact of the flu, the nation's death toll surpassed 11,500.cite book |last=Stevens |first=David |editor=Forbes, Andrew & Lovi, Michelle |title=Australian Maritime Issues 2006 |series=Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs: SPC-A Annual |volume=No. 19 |year=2007 |publisher=Sea Power Centure |location=Canberra |isbn=0642296448 |oclc= |id=issn|1327-5658 |pages=pp 135-140 |chapter=The RAN and the 1918-19 Influenza Pandemic |chapterurl=http://www.navy.gov.au/w/index.php/Publication:Semaphore_-_Issue_6%2C_2006]
When the pandemic struck in 1918, the ships of the Royal Australian Navy were dispersed throughout the world. The speed at which the flu spread, coupled with the cramped mess decks and poorly ventilated living spaces on early 20th century warships, created a favorable environment for the disease. The pandemic swept through the
British Grand Fleetin 1918; the Australian cruisers assigned to the fleet suffered high casualties, with up to 157 casualties in one ship alone.Fact|date=August 2008 Outbreaks in the Mediterranean fleets were more severe than those in the Atlantic. HMAS "Brisbane" recorded 183 casualties between November and December 1918, of those casualties 2 men died of pneumonia. The RAN lost a total of 26 men to the disease; further loss prevented primarily by the ready availability of professional medical treatment. [cite book |last=Butler |first=A |title=Official History of the Medical Services 1914-1918, Vol III, Problems and Services |year=1943 |publisher= Australian War Memorial |location= Canberra |isbn= |oclc= |id= |url= http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/chapter.asp?volume=15]
outh Pacific aid mission
The disease arrived in the South Pacific on the cargo vessel SS "Talune", which sailed from
Aucklandon 30 October 1918 whilst knowingly carrying sick passengers. "Talune" stopped in Fiji, Samoa, Tongaand Nauru: the first outbreaks in these locations occurred within days of the ships visits. The local authorities were generally unprepared for the size of the outbreak, allowing the infection to spread uncontrollably. The German territory of Samoawas the worst affected of the small islands, the New Zealand administration carried out no efforts to lessen the outbreak and rejected offers of assistance from nearby American Samoa. The New Zealand government officially apologised to Samoa in 2002 for their reaction to the outbreak. [cite web |url=http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/stories/s573248.htm |title=New Zealand Prime Minister apologises to Samoa |accessdate=2006-10-17 |author=Bradford, Gillian |date=4 |year=2002 |month=June |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Corporation] On 29 November 1918 the military governor of Apiarequested assistance from Wellington; the request was turned down on the grounds that all doctors were needed in New Zealand. Australia offered the only alternate source of aid.
The Commonwealth Naval Board was aware of the worsening situation in the region; the sloop HMAS "Fantome" while stationed in Fiji reported its first case on 11 November 1918, with half her complement eventually affected. On 20 November 1918, the Naval Board began forming a joint relief expedition from available military medical personnel. The commanding officer of HMAS "Encounter" was then ordered to embark the expedition in Sydney and sail as soon as possible. "Encounter" departed Sydney on 24 November 1918, ten minutes after completing loading. As a precaution, all 450 members of "Encounter"’s crew were doubly inoculated; the ship had suffered 74 cases earlier in the year at Fremantle and the captain did not want a repeat. "Encounter" arrived in
Suvaon 30 November and took on half of the available coal and 39 tonnes of water. [Report of cruise to render assistance in the influenza outbreak, 14 Decamber 1918, HMAS Encounter file, SPC-A] Spanish flu was rampant in Suva; Captain Thring implemented a strict quarantine, placed guards on the wharf, and ordered that coaling be carried out by the crew instead of native labour. "Encounter" departed Suva in the evening of the same day and arrived off Apiaon 3 December. Within six hours, the medical landing party assigned to Apia and their stores were ashore. "Encounter" then departed for the Tongan capital of NukuOkinaalofa, arriving on 5 December. The last of the medical staff and supplies were unloaded, and "Encounter" sailed for Suva on 7 December to re-coal. On arriving in Suva, "Encounter" received orders to return to Sydney, where reached on 17 December and was immediately placed into quarantine. The South Pacific aid mission is regarded as Australia's first overseas relief expedition, and set a precedent for future relief missions conducted by the RAN.
Between the wars
Following the end of
World War I, the Australian Governmentbelieved that an immediate evaluation of the RAN was necessary. Australia had based its naval policy on the Henderson "Recommendations" of 1911, developed by Sir Reginald Henderson. The government sent an invitation to Admiral John Jellicoe, he arrived in Australia in May 1919. Jellicoe remained in Australia for three months, before returning to England via New Zealand and Canada. Jellicoe submitted his findings in August 1919, titled the "Report on the Naval Mission to the Commonwealth". The report outlined several policies designed to strengthen British naval strength in the Pacific Ocean. The report heavily stressed a close relationship between the RAN and the Royal Navy. This would be achieved by strict adherence to the procedures and administration methods of the Royal Navy. The report also suggested constant officer exchange between the two forces. Jellicoe also called for the creation of a large Far East Imperial Fleet, which would be based in Singapore and include capital ships and aircraft carriers. The creation cost for this fleet was to be be divided between Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand: contributing 75%, 20%, and 5% respectively. The suggested makeup of the RAN would include; one aircraft carrier, two battlecruisers, eight light cruisers, one flotilla leader, twelve destroyers, a destroyer depot ship, eight submarines, one submarine depot ship, and a small number of additional auxiliary ships. The annual cost and depreciation of the fleet was estimated to be £4,024,600. With the exceptopm of implementing closer tier with the Royal Navy, none of Jellicoe's major recommendations were carried out. [http://www.awm.gov.au/cms_images/histories/24/chapters/01.pdf Australia in the War of 1939–1945, Volume I – Royal Australian Navy, 1939 – 1942 (1st edition, 1957) Chapter 1 Accessed 3 September 2006] ]
With the end of
World War I, the Australian Governmentbegan to worry about the threat Japan posed to Australia. Japan had extended its empire convert|3000|km|mi to the south, bringing it right to Australia's doorstep. Japan had continued to build up its naval force, and had reached the point where it outgunned the Royal Navy in the Pacific. The RAN and the government believed that the possibility of a Japanese invasion was highly likely. In his report, Admiral Jellicoe believed that the threat of a Japanese invasion of Australia would remain as long as the White Australia Policyremained in place. Due to the perceived threat, and bilateral support in Australia for the White Australia Policy, the Australian Government became a vocal supporter of the continuance of the 1902 Anglo-Japanese Alliance. Australia was joined in its support for the alliance by New Zealand but was heavily opposed by Canada, which believed that the alliance had hindered the British Empire's relationship with China and the United States. No decision on the alliance was agreed on, and the discussion was shelved pending the outcome of the Washington Naval Treaty. The results of the treaty, which allowed the British to retain naval supremacy in the Pacific Ocean, created a sense of security in Australia. Many Australian saw the Four Powers Pact as replacing the Anglo-Japanese Alliance. This sense of security became known as the "Ten Year Rule". This led to defence retrenchments in Australia, following the international trend, and a £500,000 reduction in expenditure. The Governor General Henry Forster when opening parliament on 22 June 1922 was quoted as saying:quote|In view of the result of attained at the Washington Treaty which, my advisors believe, guarantee peace in the Pacific for some time to come, it is proposed to reduce the establishment of the navy and army, and postpone the expansion of the air force.
World War Iand World War II, the Royal Australian Navy underwent a severe reduction in ships and manpower. As a result of the Washington Naval Treaty, the flagship HMAS "Australia" was scrapped with her main armaments and sunk outside Sydney Headsin 1924. In the same year, the RAN began a five year program of obtaining new ships from Britain: the heavy cruisers "Australia" and "Canberra" and the seaplane carrier "Albatross". This purchase was partly paid for by scrapping HMAS "Brisbane", "Melbourne", "Sydney", and most of the destroyers. The Great Depressionof 1929 led to another reduction of manpower; although reduced in size, the available posts were easily filled as many men were unemployed and the offered pay was greater than most jobs. The RAN's personnel strength fell to 3,117 personnel, plus 131 members of the Naval Auxiliary Services. By 1932, the strength of the Reserves stood at 5,446. In the early 1930s, lack of funds forced the transfer of the Royal Australian Naval Collegefrom Jervis Bay to Flinders Naval Depot in Victoria. In 1933 the Australian Government ordered three light cruisers; HMA Ships HMAS "Perth", "Hobart" and "Sydney"; selling the seaplane carrier "Albatross" to fund "Hobart". During this time, the RAN also purchased destroyers of the V and W destroyer classes, the ships that would come to be know as the Scrap Iron Flotilla. With the ever increasing threat of Germany and Japan in the late 1930s, the RAN was not in the position it was at the outbreak of World War I. [Macdougall Pg. 158]
World War II
Australia declared war on
Nazi Germanyone hour after the United Kingdom's declaration of war on 3 September 1939. At the onset of war, the Royal Australian Navy numbered:
* two heavy cruisers; "Australian" and "Canberra" both carried convert|8|in|mm|0|sing=on guns and had entered service in the 1920s
* three modern light cruisers; "Hobart", "Perth" and "Sydney", which mounted convert|6|in|mm|0|sing=on guns
* the older cruiser HMAS "Adelaide"
* four sloops, HMAS "Parramatta", "Swan", "Warrego" and "Yarra"; although only "Swan" and "Yarra" were in commission
* five obsolete V class destroyers
* a variety of support and ancillary craft
Men and vessels of the RAN served in every theatre of operations, from the tropical Pacific to the frigid Russian convoys. By the end of World War II, the RAN's combat strength numbered 150 ships with an additional 200 auxiliary craft. The RAN reached its peak in June 1945, when it ranks swelled to 39,650 personnel. During the war, the RAN lost 1,740 personnel from the 19 ships sunk, and another 436 personnel were killed aboard other ships or at other posts.cite web |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/RAN_in_the_Second_World_War |title=RAN in the Second World War |last=Straczek |first=J.H. |publisher=Royal Australian Navy |accessdate=2008-09-19]
The following table illustrates the growth of the RAN between the outbreak of war on 3 September 1939 and 30 June 1945: [Sourced from Gavin Long (1973), "The Six Years War. A Concise History of Australia in the 1939-45 War". Australian War Memorial and Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. p 16. and G. Herman Gill (1968). [http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/chapter.asp?volume=25 "Australia in the War of 1939 – 1945. Series 2 – Navy. Volume II – Royal Australian Navy, 1942 – 1945"] .
Australian War Memorial, Canberra. p 710.]
Operations against Italy, Vichy France and Germany
From mid-1940, ships of the RAN, at the request of the
Admiralty, began to deploy to the Mediterranean Seato take part in the Battle of the Mediterraneanagainst Nazi Germanyand Fascist Italy. In September 1939, the Admiralty and the Australian Commonwealth Naval Board agreed to deploy the RAN Destroyer Flotilla outside the Australia Station; the five ships of what was to become known as the Scrap Iron Flotillaarrived at Malta in mid-December. [Stevens (1996) pp. 38-39] HMAS "Sydney" deployed in May 1940 and was later joined by "Hobart". When Italy declared war on 10 June 1940, the Australian warships made up five of the twenty-two Allied destroyers and one of the five modern light cruisers on station in the Mediterranean. The RAN then offered the services of "Australia" to the Admiralty, and was accepted. When "Australia" arrived in the Mediterranean, the RAN has sent nearly the entire combat fleet to the Northern Hemisphere, leaving Australian open to possible attack. [Macdougall pg. 170]
On 27 June 1940, Admiral Cunningham commander of the Mediterranean Fleet ordered the 7th Cruiser Squadron, which included HMAS "Sydney", to rendezvous with an
Egypt-bound convoy near Cape Matapan. The cruiser squadron sighted three Italian cruisers at 6 pm on 28 June 1940 and immediately engaged them. Within an hour, the Italian cruiser "Espero" was incapacitated and "Sydney" was signaled to sink her. As "Sydney" approached, "Espero" launched torpedoes, but failed to hit any targets. "Sydney" fired four salvos, scoring ten direct hits on "Espero". "Sydney" remained at the scene for two hours picking up survivors. [Macdougall pg. 179]
On 7 July 1940, a 25 ship fleet departed
Alexandria, intending to meet a convoy east of Malta. The next day a submarine reported sighting a Italian fleet convert|500|mi|km|-2 away; the fleet altered course to intercept. The two fleets sighted each other at 3 pm on 9 July 1940, and a battle that became known as the Battle of Calabriabegan. Four vessels of the RAN took part in the battle; HMA Ships "Sydney", "Stuart", "Vampire" and "Voyager". "Sydney" was the first RAN vessels to engage the enemy, and at 3.23 pm opened fire. When the Italian fleet began to withdraw, the Allied destroyer squadron was ordered forward. HMAS "Stuart", leading the destroyer force, was the first to open fire; her opening salvo was a direct hit at a range of convert|12600|yd|m|-2. Both fleets retired, with the Italians withdrawing under smoke, but Italian aircraft continued to attack Allied ships. "Sydney", which came under heavy air attack, was believed to have sunk. [Macdougall pg. 180] The fleet arrived back in Alexandria on 13 July.cite web |url=http://www.hmassydney.com.au/ |title=HMAS Sydney Memorial |accessdaymonth=21 August |accessyear=2006 |author= |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |date= |year= |month= |format= |work= |publisher= |pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= ] cite web |url=http://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/hmas_sydney/document.htm |title=AWM HMAS Sydney |accessdaymonth=21 August |accessyear=2006 |author= |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |date= |year= |month= |format= |work= |publisher= |pages= |language= |doi= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= ]
On 17 July 1940, HMAS "Sydney" was ordered to support a
Royal Navydestroyer squadron on a sweep north of the island of Crete. At 7.20 am on 19 July, an Italian cruiser were sighted off Cape Spadaby the destroyers. "Sydney", convert|40|mi|km|-1 away, began to steam towards the enemy destroyers at over convert|30|kn|km/h|-1. [Macdougall pg. 180] "Sydney" sighted the cruisers at 8.29 am. By that time, she had achieved a speed of convert|37|kn|km/h|0, and fired the first shots of the Battle of Cape Spadaat a range of convert|17360|m|ft. [Macdougall, p. 181] The Italian cruisers began to retire from the area under a smokescreen, with "Sydney" and the destroyers in pursuit. "Sydney" scored her first direct hit on the "Giovanni dalle Bande Nere" at 8.35 am, and at the same time began to score repeated hits on the "Bartolomeo Colleoni", which by 9.25 am was incapacitated. Captain John Collins ordered the destroyers to sink "Colleoni". After he had maintained radio silence for two hours, Collins sent the following message.quote|One cruiser sunk. Ammunition practically gone. Collins decided to end the chase at 10.27 am, largely due to the fact that "Sydney" was almost out of ammunition. [Macdougall pg. 181] "Sydney" though hit several times during the battle she suffered no casualties, but casualties were suffered in subsequent air attacks.
.On 27 March 1941, an Allied fleet under Admiral Cunningham was ambushed by an Italian naval force off
Cape Matapan, Greece. [Macdougall pg. 193] Three vessels of the RAN took part in the battle; HMA Ships "Perth", "Stuart", and "Vampire". The victory at Cape Matapanallowed the evacuation of thousands of Allied troops from Crete. [ [http://users.swing.be/navbat/bataille/68.html Dakar: Operation Menace] Accessed 21 August 2006]
On 6 September 1940, HMAS "Australia" was ordered to sail to
Freetown, Sierra Leoneto join Operation Menace, the invasion of Vichy French-controlled Dakarin French West Africa. On 19 September, "Australia" and the cruiser HMS "Cumberland" sighted three Vichy cruisers heading south and shadowed them. When the French cruiser "Gloire" developed engine trouble, "Australia" escorted her towards Casablancaand returned to the fleet two days later. On 23 September "Australia" came under heavy fire from shore batteries, then drove two Vichy destroyers back into port. "Australia" then engaged and sunk the destroyer "L'Audacieux" with eight salvos in sixteen minutes. Over the next two days French and Allied forces exchanged fire; "Australia" was struck twice and lost her Walrus amphibian. "Australia" and the rest of the fleet retired on 25 September the battle became known as the Battle of Dakar. [Macdougall pg. 176] [ [http://stonebooks.com/archives/960425.shtml Book review: "The Guns of Dakar" and "Operation Menace"] ]
The "Scrap-Iron Flotilla"
Scrap Iron Flotillawas an Australian destroyer group that operated in the Mediterranean and Pacific during World War II. The name was bestowed upon the group by Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbelswho described the fleet as a "consignment of junk" and "Australia’s Scrap-Iron Flotilla". The flotilla consisted of five vessels; Scott class destroyerHMAS "Stuart" which acted as flotilla leader, and four V class destroyers; "Vampire", "Vendetta", "Voyager" and "Waterhen". The ships were all built to fight in World War I, and were slow and poorly armed compared to newer ships. [Macdougall pg. 216] The five destroyers—the entirety of the RAN's destroyer force—departed Australia in November 1939 destined for Singaporewhere they carried out anti-submarine exercises with the Royal Navysubmarine HMS "Rover". [Stevens (1996) p. 54] On 13 November 1939, the flotilla left Singapore for the Mediterranean Sea, following a request from the Admiraltyfor assistance. For a time the five Australian destroyers made up the entire Mediterranean Fleet destroyer force.Fact|date=August 2008
The Australian destroyer flotilla took part in multiple actions while in the Mediterranean, including the Allied evacuation following the battle of Greece in April 1941, though the flotilla came to fame in the mission to resupply the besieged city of Tobruk. The resupply routes from
Alexandriaand Mersa Matruh to Tobrukbecame known as "Bomb Alley" and was subject to constant Axis air attacks. [Macdougall pg. 216] The flotilla, which by this time was in poor condition, managed to make 138 supply runs to Tobruk, carrying in ammunition and stores and taking out wounded soldiers. On 28 May 1941 "Vampire" became the first of the flotilla to leave the Mediterranean. "Vendetta", the last to leave, sailed in October 1941.
Of the five destroyers, three were lost during the war; "Waterhen" was sunk in the Mediterranean on 30 June 1941, "Vampire" was sunk by Japanese aircraft during the
Indian Ocean Raidand "Voyager" ran aground at Betano, during the Timor campaign and was abandoned. [ [http://www.gunplot.net The Gun Plot] Accessed 21 August 2006]
As well as serving in the
Mediterranean Sea, ships of the RAN also served in the Red Sea. In August 1940, Italian forces invaded British Somaliland. After a fighting withdrawal, the small British garrison was evacuated from Berbera, with HMAS "Hobart" assisting in the destruction of the port and its facilities. To aid in the delaying action, "Hobart" sent a 3-pounder gun ashore, manned by volunteers from the crew. The seamen were captured by the Italians, but were later liberated. Two RAN sloops joined the Red Sea force in 1940: "Parramatta" on 30 July and "Yarra" in September. In October, "Yarra" engaged and drove off two Italian destroyers attempting to raid a convoy. Although vessels of the RAN served in the Red Sea throughout the war, after 1941 the larger RAN ships were deployed to Australian waters in response to the threat from Japan. [Macdougall pg. 182]
Loss of HMAS "Sydney"
On 19 November 1941, the Australian light cruiser HMAS "Sydney" and the German auxiliary cruiser "Kormoran" engaged each other in the Indian Ocean, off
Western Australia. The two ships sank each other: "Sydney" was lost with all 645 hands, while the majority of the "Kormoran"’s crew were rescued and became prisoners of war. The location of both wreaks reamined a mystery to many and subject to much controversy until March 16–17 2008, when both ships were found.
During early 1943, eight Australian-designed and built "Bathurst" class corvettes were transferred to Egypt from the Indian Ocean, in preparation for Operation Husky, the
War with Japan
Imperial Japanese Navy's attacks on the Allies in December 1941, the RAN redeployed its larger ships to home waters, in order to protect the Australian mainland from Japanese attack, while several smaller ships remained in the Mediterranean. From 1940 onwards, there was considerable Axis naval activity in Australian watersfirst from German commerce raiders and submarines and later by the Imperial Japanese Navy.
Initially, RAN ships served as part of the British-Australian component of the
American-British-Dutch-Australian Command(ADBACOM) naval forces. ABDACOM was wound up following the fall of the Netherlands East Indies and was succeeded by the South West Pacific Area (command)(SWPA). The United States Seventh Fleetwas formed at Brisbaneon 15 March 1943, for service in the SWPA. RAN ships in the Pacific generally served at part of Seventh Fleet taskforces.
From February 1942, the RAN played a critical role in resupplying Australian and Dutch commandos on Timor. "Voyager" was not the only loss during the campaign. On 1 December 1942, HMAS "Armidale" was attacked by thirteen Japanese aircraft while attempting to land Dutch soldiers off
Betano, Portuguese Timor. "Armidale" sank with the loss of 40 of her crew and 60 Dutch personnel. During the engagement, Ordinary Seaman Teddy Sheeanmanned an Oerlikon anti-aircraft gun and was wounded by strafing Japanese planes, he went down with the ship, still strapped into the gun and still shooting at the attacking aircraft. [cite web |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/HMAS_Sheean |title=HMAS Sheean |accessdate=2008-08-23 |publisher=Royal Australian Navy]
On 28 February 1942, a joint ABDA naval force met a Japanese invasion force in the
Java Sea. The "Leander" class cruiser, HMAS "Perth" and the American heavy cruiser USS "Houston" fought in and survived the Battle of the Java Sea.
On 1 March 1942, the two ships attempted to move through the Sunda Strait to
Tjilatjap. "Perth" and "Houston" found their path blocked by the main Japanese invasion fleet for western Java. After a prolonged battle, both ships were torpedoed. 350 crew and 3 civilians from "Perth" were killed, while 324 crew members survived the sinking and were taken prisoner by the Japanese. 106 of these died in captivity. The loss of "Perth", soon after the sinking of her sister "Sydney", had a major psychological effect on the Australian people. [van Oosten, F. C. (1976). The Battle of the Java Sea (Sea battles in close-up; 15). Naval Institute Press. ISBN 0-87021-911-1.]
On 2 May 1942, two ships of the RAN were part of the Allied force in the
Battle of the Coral Sea; HMA Ships "Australia" and "Hobart". Both ships came under intense air attack, while part of a force guarding the approaches to Port Moresby. [ [http://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/coral_sea/doc.htm AWM Battle of the Coral Sea] ]
The defence of Australian shipping
In late May and early June, 1942, a group of five
Imperial Japanese Navysubmarines made a series of attacks on Sydney and the nearby port of Newcastle. On the night of 31 May-1 June, the submarines launched three "Ko-hyoteki" class midget submarines against Allied shipping in Sydney Harbour. A torpedo intended for the cruiser USS "Chicago" exploded under the depot ship HMAS "Kuttabul", killing 21. On 8 June, two of the submarines shelled Sydney and Newcastle, with little effect. [ [http://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/midgetsub/doc.htm AWM Japanese Midget Submarine Attack on Sydney Harbour 30-31st May 1942] Accessed 21 August 2006] In response to these attacks, the RAN instituted convoys between Brisbane and Adelaide. All ships of over 1,200 tons and with speeds of less than convert|12|kn|km/h|0 were required to sail in convoy when travelling between cities on the east coast. [cite book |last=Stevens |first=David |title=A Critical Vulnerability: the impact of the submarine threat on Australia's maritime defense 1915-1954 |series=Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs |Volume=No. 15 |year=2005 |publisher=Sea Power Centre Australia |location=Canberra |isbn=0642296251 |oclc=62548623 |id=ISSN|1327-5658 |page=p 195]
The attack on Sydney and Newcastle marked the start of a sustained Japanese submarine campaign against Australia. During 1942, Japanese submarines sank 17 ships in Australian waters, although none of these ships were sailing as part of a convoy. [Stevens (2005). Pages 205-207.] 16 ships were sunk in Australian waters during 1943, before the Japanese ended the campaign in July. Five of these ships were sunk while sailing in escorted convoys. [Gill (1968). Pages 253-262.] The Australian naval authorities gradually dismantled the coastal convoy system between December 1943 and March 1944. [Stevens (2005). Pages 247-248.] By the end of the war, the RAAF and RAN had escorted over 1,100 convoys along the Australian coastline.
While the scale of the Japanese naval offensive directed against Australia was small compared to other naval campaigns of the war such as the
Second Battle of the Atlantic, these attacks were "the most comprehensive and widespread series of offensive operations ever conducted by an enemy against Australia". [David Stevens. " [http://ajrp.awm.gov.au/AJRP/AJRP2.nsf/437f72f8ac2c07238525661a00063aa6/225b90b97196e29bca256a1d00130203?OpenDocument Japanese submarine operations against Australia 1942-1944] ". Accessed 1 September 2006.] Although the RAN only sank a single full-sized Japanese submarine in Australian waters ("I-124" in January 1942) convoy escorts may have successfully reduced the threat to shipping in Australian waters by making it harder for Japanese submarines to carry out attacks. [Stevens (2005). Page 281.]
Loss of HMAS "Canberra"
The loss of HMAS "Canberra" at the
Battle of Savo Islandin August 1942 was the largest single ship loss the RAN experienced during World War II. In the early hours of the morning of 9 August 1942, "Canberra" was severely damaged off Guadalcanalin a surprise attack by a powerful Japanese naval force. "Canberra" was hit by 24 shells in less than two minutes, with 84 of her crew killed, including Captain Frank Getting. Following an order to abandon ship, "Canberra" was sunk the next day by a torpedo from a US destroyer, to prevent it being captured.
The loss of "Canberra", following the lossed of "Sydney" and "Perth", attracted unprecedented international attention and sympathy for the RAN. US President
Franklin D. Rooseveltwished to commemorate the loss of "Canberra" and requested that a US heavy cruiser under construction be named "Canberra". USS "Canberra" was launched on 19 April 1943. [ [http://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/ww2_navy/savo.htm AWM HMAS Canberra - Sinking of HMAS Canberra in Battle of Savo Island] Accessed 21 August 2006] The British Government approved the transfer of HMS "Shropshire" to the RAN as a replacement, and the ship was commissioned as HMAS "Shropshire" on 20 April 1943.
Leyte Gulf & Lingayen Gulf
Four RAN warships, "Australia", "Shropshire", "Arunta" and HMAS "Warramunga" took part in the
Battle of Leyte Gulf(October 23-25, 1944), arguably the largest naval battle in history.Fact|date=August 2008 In the lead-up, on 21 October, "Australia" became the first Allied ship to be hit by a kamikazeaircraft. [H. P. Willmott, The Battle Of Leyte Gulf: The Last Fleet Action] near Leyte Island. Gunners from "Australia" and "Shropshire" fired at, and reportedly hit, an unidentified Japanese aircraft. The plane then flew away from the ships, before turning and flying into "Australia", striking the ship's superstructure above the bridge, and spewing burning fuel and debris over a large area, before falling into the sea. A convert|200|kg|lb|adj=on bomb carried by the plane failed to explode; if it had, the ship might have been effectively destroyed. At least 30 crew members died as a result of the attack, including the commanding officer, Captain Emile Dechaineux; among the wounded was Commodore John Collins, the Australian force commander. "Australia" remained on duty, but on 25 October, was hit again and was forced to retire to the New Hebrides for repairs.
"Shropshire" and "Arunta" remained at Leyte and were part of the
United States Seventh FleetSupport Force in the action at Surigao Strait on 25 October. Both ships contributed to the sinking of the battleship "Yamashiro".
HMAS "Australia" returned to combat at the Battle of Lingayen Gulf in January 1945. However, on January 5, 6, 8 and 9, the ship was again attacked by kamikazes and suffered damage which forced it to retire once more. [ [http://www.ww2australia.gov.au/waratsea/kamikaze.html] ] "Australia" is believed not only to have experienced the first kamikaze attack but the greatest number of attacks.Fact|date=August 2008
hips with British fleets 1942-45
In 1940-42, five N class and two
Q class destroyers were built in the UK and commissioned into the RAN for service with the British Eastern Fleet:
These ships were predominantly crewed by RAN personnel, although they were often commanded by British officers and remained the property of the British government.
Following the Japanese raid on Ceylon of March-April 1942, the Eastern Fleet was transferred from its base at
Trincomalee, to the other side of the Indian Ocean: Kilindiin Kenya. From there the fleet undertook local patrols, escorted convoys and occasionally despatched ships to operations in the Mediterranean. During Operation Vigorous, a convoy to Maltain June 1942, "Nestor" was serious damaged in an air raid and slowly sank.
From late 1944, "Nepal", "Norman" and "Quiberon" were transferred, along with many other Eastern Fleet ships, to the new British Pacific Fleet (BPF). Among other operations with the BPF, they took part in the
Battle of Okinawa.
In late 1945, following the end of hostilities, the RAN acquired three more Q-class destroyers:
urrender and occupation of Japan
Ten RAN vessels were present at the signing of the Japanese surrender in
Tokyo Bayon 2 September 1945; HMA Ships "Ballarat", "Cessnock", "Gascoyne", "Hobart", "Ipswich", "Napier", "Nizam", "Pirie", "Shropshire" and "Warramunga". [cite web |url=http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq69-2.htm |title=Allied Ships Present in Tokyo Bay During the Surrender Ceremony, 2 September 1945 |accessdate=2007-01-13 |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |date=27 May 2005 |publisher=Naval Historical Center - U.S. Navy |quote=Taken from "Commander in Chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet and Pacific Ocean Areas (CINCPAC/CINCPOA) A16-3/FF12 Serial 0395, 11 February 1946: Report of Surrender and Occupation of Japan"] Following the surrender ceremony, the majority of the RAN vessels left Japanese waters for other duties. As part of the surrender agreement,Japan agreed to an Allied occupation and disarmament.
On 17 August 1945, the Australian Government agreed to provide two cruisers and two destroyers for service with the
British Commonwealth Occupation Force(BCOF). A total of 15 RAN ships served with the BCOF, the ships performed a variety of tasks but were mainly employed on the Kyushu Patrol, preventing Korean nationals from illegally entering Japan.
The RAN also played a role in the disarmament of Japan, assisting in the scuttling of former
Imperial Japanese Navyships, in one instance HMAS "Quiberon" took part in the sinking of seven submarines of Kyushu as part of Operation Bottom. When Indian and New Zealand contingents began to withdraw from the BCOF, the operation became a predominantly Australian operation. In 1948, Kure naval base was turned over to Australia, and became known as HMAS "Commonwealth".
North Koreainvaded South Korea on 25 June 1950, one RAN ship was on station as part of BCOF. The Australian Government immediately offered HMAS "Shoalhaven" for United Nationsservice. Eventually, all RAN ships in the area were transferred to the command of British Commonwealth Forces Korea(BCFK). [Frame, pp 198-199] [Stevens (2001), pp 156-157]
Following World War II, the RAN reduced its surface fleet but continued to expand in other ways, acquiring two Royal Navy "Majestic" class aircraft carriers then under construction (HMS "Majestic" and HMS "Terrible") to build up a Fleet Air Arm. In the 1960s, the RAN began to move away from British-designed ships; the last major British design used was the
Type 12 frigate, which formed the basis of the "River" class frigates. When it was decided that the RAN should commission a destroyer armed with guided missiles, the obvious British design was the "County" class; however, the RAN had reservations regarding the gas turbine propulsion, the Seaslug missile system, and the ability to adapt the design to Australian needs. Instead, the Australian government chose the United States-built, steam turbine-powered "Charles F. Adams" class destroyer, armed with the Tartar missileas the basis for its "Perth" class, the first major US warship design chosen for the RAN. [Macdougall Pg. 327]
By the mid-late 1960s, the RAN was at the zenith of its operational capabilities; it was capable of dispatching a full
carrier battle groupin support of major operations by having in service an aircraft carrier (HMAS "Melbourne"), three large area defence destroyers of the "Perth" class, six modern "River" class frigates and four "Oberon" class submarines.
With the retreat of British forces west of the
Suez Canalin the 1960s, the RAN began to take a more defensive role, and in co-operation with the United States, allied though the ANZUStreaty. The RAN saw service in many of the world's post war conflicts, including Korea, Vietnam, and the Indonesian Confrontation.
On 27 June 1950, the
United Nations Security Councilcalled on member nations to aid South Korea. On 29 June, Prime Minister Robert Menziesannounced that the frigate HMAS "Shoalhaven", stationed in Japan, and the destroyer HMAS "Bataan", in Hong Kong, would be placed under UN command in Korea. On 1 July, one day after President Truman committed American ground forces to Korea, the first Australian operation in Korea took place; "Shoalhaven" moved from Japan to Pusanescorting an American ammunition ship. On 27 July 1950, the destroyer HMAS "Warramunga" was also deployed.
During the Landing at
Wonsanin October 1950, "Warramunga" provided gunfire support during the landing of U.S. X Corps. During the mass evacuation of troops and refugees in the city of Hungnamin December 1950, HMA Ships "Bataan" and "Warramunga" assisted in the evacuation. In October 1951, "Sydney" arrived in Korean waters to replace HMS "Glory" for a three month tour. Sydney carried two squadron of Sea Furies ( 805 Squadron RANand 808 Squadron RAN) and the Firefly-equipped 817 Squadron RAN. At the conclusion of the tour, "Sydney" returned to Japan having lost only nine aircraft, with three pilots killed, and having launched over 2,700 missions from her flight deck. over the course of the Korean War, nine ships of the RAN participated in the naval blockade of North Korea. [Macdougall Pg. 321-323]
The Malayan Emergency was declared on 18 June 1948, brought about by a rise in Malayan Communist guerrillas in
Malaysia. Australia, as a member of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization, first deployed troops in 1950. The first ships of the RAN to arrive in the area were the "Tribal" class destroyers "Warramunga" and "Arunta" in June 1955. Other ships that served in Malayan waters during the Emergency included HMA Ships "Anzac", "Melbourne", "Quadrant", "Queenborough", "Quiberon", "Quickmatch", "Sydney", "Tobruk", "Vampire", "Vendetta" and "Voyager".cite web |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/The_RAN%2C_the_Strategic_Reserve_and_the_Malayan_Emergency |title=The RAN, the Strategic Reserve and the Malayan Emergency |publisher=Royal Australian Navy |accessdate=2008-09-19] During the period, ships of the RAN also served with the Far East Strategic Reserve; between 1955 and 1960 a total of thirteen RAN ships served with the Strategic Reserve. Serving as part of a larger naval organisation provided valuable experience for the ships of the RAN. Seven members of the RAN died while serving during the Emergency and with the Strategic Reserve.
The decision to deploy the RAN to the area was due to the strong anti-communist feeling in Australia and the
western worldin the 1950s and 1960s. The primary role of the RAN was to provide "a deterrent to further Communist aggression in South East Asia". The secondary role was "to assist in the maintenance of the security of the Federation of Malaya by participating in operations against the Communist Terrorists".
In response to the
Indonesian invasion of Borneoand Malaya in 1963, Australia increased its presence in the region. At the outbreak of hostilities, the RAN frigates"Yarra" and "Parramatta" were on duty in the area. As tension mounted, Australia increased its presence by sending "Sydney", "Vampire", "Vendetta", "Duchess" and "Derwent" to the area. On May 19 1964 the 16th Minesweeping Squadron, comprising six "Ton" class minesweepers, was also deployed. [cite web |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/Indonesian_Confrontation |title=Indonesian Confrontation |publisher=Royal Australian Navy |accessdate=2008-09-19]
On 13 December 1964, the minesweeper HMAS "Teal" was fired upon with automatic weapons by an unlit vessel whilst operating as part of the
Singapore Straitpatrol. The vessel was overpowered and arrested by "Teal", following a further small arms engagement that resulted in the deaths of three Indonesian crew members. On 23 February 1965, "Teal" was again involved in another engagement, she detected an unlit vessel off Cape Rachado. The suspicious vessel was closed on and illuminated, and revealed nine armed men in uniform who surrendered immediately upon challenge. HMAS "Hawk" became the second vessel of the 16th Minesweeping Squadron to see action when on 13 March 1966, while patrolling off Raffles Light, came under fire from an Indonesian shore battery. Eleven high explosive rounds were fired at the ship, some landing within convert|200|yd|m|-2 of the vessel, "Hawk" withdrew from the area at speed. The following morning, "Hawk" intercepted a sampan with five Indonesians on board who were promptly arrested.
When Indonesian forces crossed the border into
Sebatik Island, Sabahon 28 June 1965, HMAS "Yarra" was called on to carry out bombardments disrupting the withdrawal of the Indonesians. "Yarra" carried out two more bombardments of the border area on 5 and 10 July. During three runs, "Yarra" fired a total of 70 rounds on the enemy. On 13 August 1966, an agreement between Indonesia and Malaysia brought an end to the conflict.
During the night of 10 February 1964 the worst peacetime disaster in the RAN's history occurred when the destroyer HMAS "Voyager" was cut in two by the bow of the aircraft carrier HMAS "Melbourne", killing 82 of the 293 men on board "Voyager". [Stevens (2001) Pg. 201] [Macdougall Pg. 332] "Melbourne" was conducting air group exercises off Jervis Bay with "Voyager" acting as the rescue destroyer. "Voyager"’s duty was to remain convert|1000|yd|m|-3 astern of "Melbourne". At 9:00pm, "Melbourne"’s commanding officer, Captain John Robertson, ordered a flying course and then observed "Voyager" move from a position fine on the starboard bow to take up her station. Unexpectedly, "Voyager" turned into the carrier and continued on this course until a collision was unavoidable. [Stevens (2001) Pg. 201] The collision killed 81 members of the destroyer's crew, including Captain Stevens and one civilian dockworker. The search for survivors went on through the night. [Stevens (2001) Pg. 201]
Following the collision Prime Minister Menzies ordered a
Royal Commissionunder Sir John Spicer to investigate the event. Following 50 days of hearings it was found that "Voyager"’s inability to mount a proper lookout as the primary cause for the collision, but also placed some blame on the actions of Robertson and several of the carrier's bridge officers. [Stevens (2001) Pg.202] Robertson was cleared during his court martial but left the service after being transferred to a shore posting. [Macdougall Pg. 332] The decision to award some of the blame on the bridge crew of "Melbourne" was seen as unfair by many and public pressure began to mount on the Naval Board. The increase in public pressure and allegations that "Voyager"’s captain had a severe drinking problem led to a second Royal Commission in 1967, the only time two Royal Commissions have been held for the same incident. [Stevens (2001) Pg.202] The second Royal Commission sat for 85 days and completely cleared Robertson of any fault. The two commissions caused great anguish in the hierarchy of the RAN, which was not accustomed to such tight scrutiny, and led to the eventual dismantling of the Naval Board's isolation from the civilian world. [Stevens (2001) Pg. 202]
After the loss of "Voyager" the RAN, which was becoming increasingly busy in the
South East Asiaregion, identified the need for a speedy replacement. Both the United Kingdom and the United States of America offered to loan ships to the RAN as a replacement; the Royal Navy offering "Daring" class destroyer HMS "Duchess" while the United States Navy offered two "Fletcher" class destroyers: US Ships "The Sullivans" and "Twining".cite book |last=Frame |first=Tom |authorlink=Tom Frame (bishop) |coauthors= |editor= |others= |title=A Cruel Legacy: the HMAS Voyager tragedy |year=2005 |publisher=Allen & Unwin |location=Crows Nest, NSW |isbn=1741144213 |pages=p 21] "Duchess" was accepted and modernised, and as she was only intended to be in RAN service for four years (although she was later sold to the RAN and served until 1977), the RAN ordered the construction of two improved frigates based on the "River" or "Type 12" class design.Tom Frame, 2005, "A Cruel Legacy", pp 21-22] HMAS "Swan" and HMAS "Torrens" entered service in 1970 and 1971 respectively.Tom Frame, 2005, "A Cruel Legacy", pg 22]
Ships of the Royal Australian Navy were stationed on continuous operational service in Vietnam between 1965 and 1972; a total 18 ships served in Vietnam waters during the war. During this period, the Navy performed a wide variety of operational tasks at sea, ashore, and in the air. The RAN's primary contribution consisted of destroyers, Fleet Air Arm personnel attached to a
United States Armyhelicopter company and No. 9 Squadron RAAF, a Clearance Diving Team, and a logistical support force consisting of transport and escort ships. Other RAN personnel served ashore in medical teams or performed staff duties at the Australian Embassy in Saigonor the 1st Australian Task ForceHeadquarters in Nui Dat.
The RAN did not deploy operationally until 1965, but in 1962 HMAS "Vampire" and HMAS "Quickmatch" made goodwill visits to Saigon. They were followed a year later by similar visits by HMAS "Quiberon" and HMAS "Queenborough". In 1967 HMAS "Hobart" became the first RAN destroyer to be operationally deployed to
Vietnam. "Hobart" served three tours in Vietnam from March to September in 1967, 1968, and 1970. During her operations, she fired 10,000 rounds at 1,000 shore targets and came under fire around 10 times, including on one occasion by a United States F-4 Phantom.cite book |last=Frame |first=Tom |authorlink=Tom Frame (bishop) |title=Pacific Partners: a history of Australian-American naval relations |year=1992 |publisher=Hodder & Stoughton |location=Rydalmere, NSW |isbn=034056685X |oclc=27433673 |pages=p 122] "Hobart" was awarded the United States Navy Unit Commendationin recognition of her service in Vietnam ,while her sister ship, "Perth" received both the United States Navy Unit Commendation and the Meritorious Unit Commendation. In their five years of service in Vietnam, the four gunline destroyers; "Perth", "Brisbane", "Hobart" and "Vendetta" steamed over 397,000 miles and fired 102,546 rounds.cite web |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/Naval_Operations_in_Vietnam |title=Naval Operations in Vietnam |publisher=Royal Australian Navy |accessdate=2008-09-19]
The aircraft carrier HMAS "Sydney" was converted for troopship duties in the early 1960s, and began her first voyage to Vietnam in May 1965, transporting the
1st Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment, from Sydney to Vung Tauin southern Vietnam. Sydney became known as the "Vung Tau Ferry" and made 25 voyages to Vietnam: carrying 16,094 troops, 5,753 deadweight tons (5,845 t) of cargo and 2,375 vehicles. [Macdougall Pg. 332]
In 1969, the aircraft carrier HMAS "Melbourne" rammed and sank another destroyer.Frame, "Pacific Partners", p 126] During the night of 2-3 June, USS "Frank E. Evans" was escorting the carrier during multinational wargames in the
South China Sea. Ordered to the planeguard station, "Evans" crosses the carrier's bows and was cut in two, killing 74 United States personnel.Frame, "Pacific Partners", p 127] A Joint RAN-USN Board of Inquirywas established, which found "Melbourne"’s Captain John Stevenson and three officers from "Evans" at fault. Despite being cleared by a RAN court-martial, Stevenson resigned after receiving similar treatment to Robertson in the first collision.Frame, "Pacific Partners", pp 130–131.] HMAS "Melbourne" is credited as being the only warship to sink two friendly vessels in peacetime. [cite book |last=Bastock |first=John |title=Australia's Ships of War |year=1975 |publisher=Angus and Robertson |location=Cremorne, NSW |isbn=0207129274 |oclc=2525523 |pages=p 313]
In April 1971, Prime Minister
John Gortonannounced that Australian forces in Vietnam would be reduced. This led to the withdrawal of the clearance divers in May and the Fleet Air Arm in June. The final RAN destroyer on the gunline, "Brisbane", returned to Sydney on 15 October 1971. The Whitlam government withdrew all Australian forces from and stopped military aid to South Vietnam. HMAS "Jeparit" returned to Sydney on 11 March 1972 and was followed the next day by HMAS "Sydney". During the 10 years that the RAN was involved in the war, eight officers and sailors were killed, and another 46 were either wounded or suffered other injuries. [Macdougall Pg. 338]
During the morning of 25 December 1974,
Tropical Cyclone Tracystruck the city of Darwin, killing 71 people and causing $4 billion of damage (1998 AUD).cite web |url=http://www.bom.gov.au/weather/wa/cyclone/about/faq/faq_ext_7.shtml |title=Bureau of Meteorology - Frequently Asked Questions |publisher= Bureau of Meteorology|year=2006 |accessdate=2006-03-24] In response to the cyclone, the RAN embarked upon Operation: Navy Help Darwin; the largest peacetime disaster relief operation in its history, involving 13 ships, 11 aircraft and some 3,000 personnel.cite web |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/w/index.php/Publication:Semaphore_-_Issue_14%2C_2004 |title=Disaster Relief - Cyclone Tracy and Tasman Bridge |publisher=Sea Power Centre |work=Semaphore |accessdaymonth=23 August |accessyear=2008]
When Tracy struck Darwin, the RAN had a total of 351 personnel based in the city, along with four "Attack" class patrol boats; the small number of men limited the capability of the RAN to render immediate assistance to the citizens of Darwin. [Johnson. E, Operation Navy help: Disaster operations by the RAN post Cyclone-Tracy, Northern Territory Library Service, Darwin, 1987, pg. 2] All four patrol boats were damaged in some way by the storm. HMAS "Arrow" sunk under Stokes Hill Wharf with the loss of two sailors, HMAS "Attack" was beached by the force of the winds at Doctor's Gully, while HMAS "Advance" and HMAS "Assail" were slightly damaged. Land based naval installations were also heavily damaged by the cyclone, Darwin Naval Headquarters was destroyed, as was large sections of the patrol boat base and the married quarters. The oil fuel supply installation and naval communications station at HMAS "Coonawarra" were also damaged. The initial RAN relief which was limited to search and rescue in the area of Darwin Harbour and Melville Island was hindered by the lack of reliable communications.
As the severity of the disaster was realised, a naval task force under Rear Admiral R.E. Wells was established to render aid to the people of Darwin; Operation Help Darwin. A general recall was issued to all personnel; of the 2,700 Sydney-based sailors on leave at the time, approximately 2,200 were able to return to their ships, with other volunteers filling any vacant positions onboard. The first RAN assets began to arrived in Darwin on 26 December, a Hawker-Siddeley 748 from 851 Squadron landed at Darwin Airport carrying blood transfusion equipment and Red Cross workers, followed shortly by another HS748 carrying Clearance Diving Team One (CDT 1). Ships also began departing for Darwin on 26 December. HMAS "Balikpapan" and HMAS "Betano" sailed from Brisbane, HMAS "Flinders" sailed from Cairns, and HMAS "Melbourne", "Brisbane" and "Stuart" sailed from Sydney. The following day HMA Ships "Hobart", "Stalwart", "Supply", and "Vendetta" sailed from Sydney, while "Brunei" and "Tarakan" departed Brisbane. Nine Wessex helicopters from 725 and 817 Squadron were embarked on "Melbourne" and "Stalwart".
The RAN taskforce was tasked with the responsibility of clearing and restoring 4,740 houses in the northern suburbs of Nightcliff,
Rapid Creekand Casuarina. RAN aircraft continued to ferry supplies and personnel into Darwin and evacuate displaced Darwin citizens. Some displaced residents were housed in the many naval bases located on Sydney Harbour, along with HMAS "Moreton" in Brisbane.
The first vessels, HMA Ships "Brisbane" and "Flinders", arrived in Darwin on 31 December. "Flinders" surveyed the approaches to Darwin, ensuring the safety of the taskforce, while "Brisbane" landed working parties and established communications. The entire task force had arrived in Darwin by 13 January 1975, the force brought more than 3,000 personnel to the city. Men of the task force usually worked in small working parties of 10 to 15 men.
The men and women of the RAN made a significant contribution to the relief effort; from 1 January to 30 January naval personnel spent 17,979 man days ashore, with up to 1,200 personnel ashore at one time. Some 1,593 housing blocks were cleared and government and private facilities cleaned up.
Westland Wessexhelicopters transported 7,832 passengers, convert|110912|kg|lb of supplies and freight and made 2,505 landings. The Hawker-Siddeley 748 aircraft made a total of 14 return flights to Darwin, carried out 485 passengers, and brought in convert|22680|kg|lb of freight. Vessels of the task force began to depart Darwin as early as 7 January, with HMA Ships "Brisbane" and "Stalwart" the last to depart on 31 January. With the departure of the majority of the RAN personnel, the command of the relief operation was turned over to the Commandant of the Army's 7th Military District.
Pacific patrol boat program
Following the introduction of the 1982
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(UNCLOS) the exclusive economic zone(EEZ) of many coastal nations was increased from convert|12|to|200|Nmi|km. The sudden expansion of responsibility dramatically increased the area of ocean requiring surveillance, monitoring and policing by these nations, increasing the strain on existing maritime patrol resources, and highlighting the need for countries without a maritime patrol force to obtain one, especially in the South West Pacific area.cite web |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/w/index.php/Publication:Semaphore_-_Issue_2%2C_2005 |title=The Pacific Patrol Boat Project |work=Semaphore |publisher=Sea Power Centre |accessdaymonth=23 August |accessyear=2008]
In 1979, the Australian and New Zealand Governments, at the request of Pacific Island nations, sent defence representatives into the South-West Pacific region to assess surveillance and maritime patrol requirements. The governments of a number of the Pacific nations expressed their concern about the need for a suitable naval patrol force to meet their new surveillance requirements. The Australian government responded by creating the Defence Cooperation Project (DCP), to provide suitable patrol vessels, training and infrastructure to island nations in the region. The Pacific Patrol Boat Systems Program Office was created within the Minor War Vessels Branch of the RAN procurement organisation.
The tender for the vessels was released in August 1984, and was awarded to Australian Shipbuilding Industries Pty Ltd (now
TenixWestern Australia) in September 1985. The first of ten vessels was to be delivered in early 1987. The first vessel, HMPNGS "Tarangau", was officially handed over to the Papua New Guinea Defence Forceon 16 May 1987. Over the course of the project the number of participating countries increased. By the end of the construction phase of the project, a total of 22 boats had been delivered to 12 countries, compared to the original order of 10 boats for 8 countries. In total, the project cost for 22 vessels and associated support was $A155.25 million.
The RAN never operated the
Pacific class patrol boat(PPB), although the project has given the RAN a number of advantages in the Pacific region. The introduction of self-reliant patrol forces throughout the region has eased the strain on Australia’s own maritime patrol force. Cooperation between Australia and its Pacific neighbours has allowed for a greater allocation of RAN patrol boats to protecting Australia’s maritime resources, patrolling the Sea Lines of Communication(SLOC), and conducting border protection operations. The PPB's have recently undergone a mid life refit which could potentially see them operating in the region until at least 2027.
The main role of the Royal Australian Navy in the two decades following the end of Australia's involvement in the Vietnam War was supporting Australian diplomatic initiatives. In line with this goal the RAN exercised with the navies of Australia's allies and provided support to civil authorities in Australia and the South Pacific. [Tom Frame (2004), "No Pleasure Cruise. The Story of the Royal Australian Navy". Allen & Unwin, Sydney. Pg. 251.] The RAN's main military concern from the 1970s was the activities of the
Soviet Navyin the Indian Ocean. These concerns lead to increased cooperation with the United States Navy and the development of the RAN's main base in Western Australia, HMAS "Stirling". [Frame. Pg. 257.]
During the late 1970s, the RAN replaced many of its aging ships with modern equivalents. While it was planned to purchase the British aircraft carrier HMS "Invincible" to replace "Melbourne", Britain's offer of the carrier was withdrawn after the
Falklands War. As a result, "Melbourne" was decommissioned without replacement in 1982 and the Fleet Air Arm retired almost all of its fixed wing aircraft on 30 June 1983. [Frame. Pg. 262.]
In 1987, the Hawke Government's Defence White Paper called for the RAN to become a more self reliant "two-ocean" navy with major fleet bases in
New South Walesand Western Australia. The plan called for the expansion of "Stirling" on Garden Island and Jervis Bay to accommodate an expanded RAN combat surface and submarine fleets. The plan originally called for the major combat units and submarines to be split between the two fleet bases, providing similar capabilities on both sided of the continent. The proposed Jervis Bay naval base never became a reality; Fleet Base East was built up around HMAS "Kuttabul" in Sydney while HMAS "Stirling" is home to half the surface fleet and the entire submarine fleet. The rationale behind the policy included the possibility of savings in fuel and maintenance that would result from Indian Oceandeployments beginning their journey from Western Australiarather than New South Wales. The report also classed the Indian Ocean as an area where contingencies might arise. The new facilities would increase Australia's worth to the United States, particularly to do with maintenance of submarines. Expansion at Jervis Bay would allow intensified east coast visits by the United States Pacific Fleet, and its nuclear warship visits would not run into as much opposition as they do in Sydney and Melbourne. [ [http://www.agitprop.org.au/lefthistory/1987_booker_new_pacific_policeman.php Analysis of the 1987 Defence White Paper Accessed on 27 August 2006] ]
The 1987 White Paper was seen by many as an attempt to strengthen Australia's relationship with the United States, which had been damaged by New Zealands stance against nuclear weapons in its ports. In line with this policy, the RAN was structured to become more self-reliant and its activities during the late 1980s were focused on operating within Australia's local region. [Frame. Pgs 267-272.]
The Two Ocean Policy remains in place today and is supported by the current Australian Government and the opposition. The success of the policy is especially evident at HMAS "Stirling". The base is thriving and its location both in a global and local context gives it an advantage over Fleet Base East. It has been suggested that all 8 units of the "Anzac" class be relocated to "Stirling", this would create an easier training environment for sailors and would lead to significant cost savings. [ [http://www.navy.gov.au/speeches/2004/040624_aidn_wa.html Speech by Vice Admiral Chris Ritchie on Thursday 24 June 2004. Accessed 28 August 2006] Dead link|date=August 2008]
The Gulf Wars
Australia's contribution to the 1991 Gulf War centered around a Naval Task Group which formed part of the multi-national fleet in the
Persian Gulfand Gulf of Oman. In addition, medical teams were deployed aboard a U.S. hospital ship and a naval clearance diving team took part in de-mining Kuwait's port facilities at the end of the war. Over the period from 6 September 1990 to 4 September 1991 the RAN deployed a total of six ships to the area: HMA Ships "Adelaide", "Brisbane", "Darwin", "Success", "Sydney" and "Westralia". Clearance Diving Team 3 operated in the theatre from 27 January 1991 to 10 May 1991. It was involved in mine clearing operations in Kuwaitfrom 5 March to 19 April 1991. [Australian War Memorial. Gulf War 1990-1991] [Commander J.P. Hodgman (editor) (1991). Australia’s Navy 1991 – 92. Australian Department of Defence. Canberra.]
After the end of the first Gulf War the Royal Australian Navy periodically deployed a ship to the Gulf or
Red Seato assist in maintaining sanctions against Iraq. Until the outbreak of the Second Gulf War the Australian naval force in the Persian Gulfcontinued to enforce the sanctions against Iraq. These operations were conducted by boarding parties from the RANwarships. [Greg Nash and David Stevens (2006) "Australia's Navy in the Gulf. From Countenance to Catalyst, 1941-2006". Topmill, Sydney. Pages 61-63.]
Upon the outbreak of war, the RAN's focus shifted to supporting the coalition land forces and clearing the approaches to Iraqi ports. HMAS "Anzac" provided gunfire support to
Royal Marinesduring fighting on the Al-Faw Peninsulaand the Clearance Diving Team took part in clearing the approaches to Umm Qasr. Boarding operations continued during the war, and on 20 March boarding parties from the HMAS "Kanimbla" seized an Iraqi ship carrying 86 naval mines. [Nash and Stevens (2006). Pages 66-72.]
Since the end of the war the RAN has continuously maintained a frigate in the Persian Gulf to protect Iraq's oil infrastructure and participate in counter-smuggling operations. Twelve Australian sailors were deployed to Umm Qasr, Iraq between January and October 2004 to join the multi-national training team working with the
Iraqi Coastal Defense Force. [Nash and Stevens (2006). Pages 80-81.] The RAN has also assumed command of coalition forces in the Persian Gulf on two occasions; Combined Task Force 58 in 2005 [Journalist Seaman Joseph Ebalo, [http://www.news.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=18240 "Australian-Led Command Patrols Persian Gulf"] . Navy newsstand. 10 May 2005.] and Combined Task Force 158 in 2006. [Lt. Karen E. Eifert [http://www.news.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=26621 "U.S. Navy Takes the Reins of CTF 158 from Royal Australian Navy"] . Navy newsstand. 15 November 2006.]
HMAS Westralia fire
On 5 May 1998, a fire broke out onboard HMAS "Westralia" while off the
Western Australiacoast. The fire was caused by the rupture of a flexible fuel line (one of a number used to replace rigid hoses) on cylinder number nine, starboard engine. This sprayed diesel fuel onto a hot indicator cock, which ignited a spray fire, resulting in the deaths of four crew. Following the fire, the Australian Government and the RAN began a major investigation known as the "Westralia Board of Inquiry". The enquiry found that the RAN and the contractor Australian Defence Industries(ADI) did not critically examine their course of action and that key personnel in both the RAN and the contractor were insufficiently trained and qualified. The inquiry also found that the hoses were not properly designed and were unfit for the intended purpose. [cite web |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/w/index.php/Publication:Westralia_Board_of_Inquiry |format=PDF subpages |title=Westralia Board of Inquiry |publisher=Royal Australian Navy |accessdaymonth=23 August |accessyear=2008] In 2005, ADI was fined $75,000 for failing to provide a safe workplace.Fact|date=August 2008 Seven sailors who were apparently severely traumatised by the fire have also sued ADI and subcontractor Jetrock.Fact|date=August 2008 In August 2006, the Australian Government decided to accept liability after it reached settlement with the ADI and Jetrock. The seven sailors stand to receive compensation totalling up to $10 million. [ [http://www.theage.com.au/news/National/Govt-opens-way-for-Westralia-payouts/2006/08/29/1156617313071.html Westralia sailors set for $10m compo] The Age Newspaper Accessed 13 September 2006]
During the Australian-led
United Nationspeacekeeping mission to East Timorin 1999 known as INTERFET, the RAN deployed a total of 16 ships to the mission: HMA Ships "Adelaide", "Anzac", "Balikpapan", "Brunei", "Darwin", "Farncomb", "Jervis Bay", "Labuan", "Success", "Sydney", "Tarakan", "Tobruk", "Waller","Westralia", "Newcastle" and "Melbourne. [ [http://www.britains-smallwars.com/RRGP/EastTimor.html INTERFET Military Personnel Chart accessed 27 August 2006] ] The RAN played a vital role in transporting troops and providing protection to transports and were vital to the success of INTERFET.
The RAN returned to East Timor in 2006 under
Operation Astutethe United Nations-authorised, Australian-led military deployment to East Timorto quell unrest and return stability during the 2006 East Timor crisis. The Royal Australian Navy deployed the Amphibious Ready Group, including the ships; "Kanimbla", "Manoora", "Tobruk" (until approximately 8 June), "Balikpapan", "Tarakan", "Success" (until 28 May). The RAN also deployed the "Adelaide" class frigate HMAS "Adelaide" (until 28 May). The Fleet Air Arm contributed one S-70B-2 Seahawk helicopter from 816 Squadron RAN(until 28 May) and two Sea King helicopters from 817 Squadron RAN. The Royal Australian Navyforce committed to Operation Astute is apparently the largest amphibious task force in the Navy's history. [ [http://www.defence.gov.au/news/navynews/editions/4909/topstories/story01.htm Navy News] ]
On 24 July 2003, HMAS "Manoora" arrived off
Honiara, marking the beginning of Operation Anode, Australia's contribution to the Regional Assistance Mission to the Solomon Islands(RAMSI). The deployment of a 2,200 strong multinational force followed several years of unrest in the Solomon Islands. Manoora was soon joined by HMA Ships "Hawkesbury", "Labuan", "Wewak" and "Whyalla". Following the initial deployment, two vessels were generally kept on station in the area. By the time the RAN deployment ended, 19 Australian warships had taken part. The last ship to leave was HMAS "Fremantle", which sailed home in October 2004. [cite web |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/w/index.php/Publication:Semaphore_-_Issue_13%2C_2005 |title=The Royal Australian Navy and the restoration of stability in the Solomon Islands |publisher=Royal Australian Navy |=accessdaymonth=23 August |accessyear=2008]
Operation Anode was not the first time units of the RAN had been deployed to the Solomon Islands; Anode was unique in that the navy's primary role was to support and facilitate the work of the Participating Police Force (PPF). Moreover, in addition to being the first time the RAN had supported a police-led mission, [C. Woods, 'Bikfala Sip: Aussies come to Help our Pacific Friends', Navy News, 14 August 2003. Accessed on 14 September 2006] Operation Anode and RAMSI is one of the latest examples of the role Australia and specifically the RAN is playing in stabilising the
On 2 November 2006, in response to the Fijian military threats to overthrow the Fijian Government, the Australian government commenced
Operation Quickstepby deploying military resources to support Australian citizens in Fiji in the event of a coup d'état. The contribution from the RAN was the deployment of three vessels; HMA Ships "Kanimbla", "Newcastle" and "Success" to international waters south of Fiji. The three vessels were deployed to Fiji to evacuate the estimated 7,000 Australian citizens present in Fiji if the need arose. [ [http://www.fijitimes.com/story.aspx?id=52286 Aussie Navy vessels ready for Fiji evacuation] . " Fiji Times", 24 November 2006.] Along with the three vessels a detachment of the Special Air Service Regiment, helicopters from the 171st Aviation Squadron and an evacuation team were also deployed.
On 29 November 2006, an
Australian ArmyS-70A Black Hawk helicopter operating from "Kanimbla", and carrying ten Army personnel on board, crashed whilst attempting to land on the ship's deck, killing 1 person, injuring 7 more and leaving one missing (later confirmed dead).. [cite news |url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200611/s1800631.htm |title=One dead, one missing in Black Hawk crash off Fiji |date= 2006-11-29|accessdate=2006-11-29 |publisher=ABC] [cite news |url=http://www.defence.gov.au/media/download/audio/061129/Bhawk_conf_29NOV06_lo.wmv |title=BLACK HAWK HELICOPTER LOST NEAR FIJI (.wmv) |date=2006-11-29 |accessdate=2006-11-30 |publisher= Australian Defence Force] HMAS "Melville" arrived on task the morning of 15 December 2006, equipped with a Towed Pinger Locating Drone supplied from the United States Navyset about locating the downed Black Hawk. "Melville" detected the locator beacon during its first pass over the crash site and pinpointed its exact location in subsequent passes. The helicopter is sitting in around 2900 metres of water.cite news |url=http://www.defence.gov.au/media/DepartmentalTpl.cfm?CurrentId=6271 |title=NAVY DETECTS MISSING BLACK HAWK’S LOCATOR BEACON |date=2006-12-15 |accessdate=2006-12-15 |publisher= Australian Defence Force
cite news |url=http://www.defence.gov.au/media/DepartmentalTpl.cfm?CurrentId=6316 |title=NAVY TO CONDUCT FURTHER SURVEY OF LOST BLACK HAWK LOCATION |date=2007-01-16 |accessdate=2007-01-18 |publisher=
Australian Defence Force]
The coup took place on 5 December, but was bloodless and almost completely without violence. The evacuation of Australians was deemed unnecessary, and vessels of the task force began arriving back in Australian on 17 December, with "Kanimbla" docking in Townsville, and both "Newcastle" and "Success" returning to Sydney. [cite news |url=http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20941630-1702,00.html |title=Fiji navy task force returns |date=2006-12-17 |accessdate=2006-12-17 |publisher=
The Australian] "Melville" returned to Australia in late December. The RAN has decided to attempt to recover the downed Black Hawk and has identified the United States Navy Supervisor of Salvage(SUPSALV) as the preferred organisation. MV "Seahorse Standard" recovered the remains of Trooper Porter on 5 March and the Blackhawk helicopter on 9 March, with the assistance of specialist equipment provided by the SUPSALV team. Trooper Porters body was repatriated on 13 March, escorted by members of the Special Air Service Regiment. "Seahorse Standard" arrived in Australia with the aircraft wreckage at the end of March. The wreckage will become evidence in the Board of Inquiry into the crash. [cite news |url=http://www.minister.defence.gov.au/NelsonMintpl.cfm?CurrentId=6450 |title=BLACKHAWK RECOVERED FROM THE SEABED |date=2007-03-09 |accessdate=2007-03-14 |publisher= Australian Defence Force]
Women in the RAN
From 1911 to 1941 women were forbidden from serving in the RAN; the demands
World War IIplaced on personnel and resources led to a change of policy.cite journal |author= |year=2006 |month=November |title=Women in the RAN: The Road to Command At Sea |journal=Semaphore |volume=2006 |issue=19 |doi= |id= |url=http://www.navy.gov.au/w/index.php/Publication:Semaphore_-_Issue_19%2C_2006 |accessdate =2008-08-23] On 21 April 1941, the Australian Naval Board sent a letter authorising the entry of women into the RAN to the Commodore-in-Charge, Sydney. The letter led to the formation of the Women's Royal Australian Naval Service(WRANS) and the Royal Australian Naval Nursing Service(RANNS). The two separate women's services existed until 1984, when they were incorporated into the permanent force. Today, female members of the RAN have a wide variety of roles open to them; women serve on submarines, command ships and shore postings and are expected to play an increasingly important role in the future of the RAN. ["Women in the RAN"]
The current navy
The Royal Australian Navy today is a medium sized modern navy in world terms but is one of the strongest navies in the
Asia PacificRegion. Today, the combat fleet of the RAN is made up of eight "Anzac" class frigates, four "Adelaide" class frigates, fourteen patrol boats of the "Armidale" class, and six "Collins" class submarines. The RAN also comprises a large amphibious and supply force in order to transport the Australian Armyand to resupply the combat arm of the navy. [ [http://www.navy.gov.au/w/index.php/Main_Page Royal Australian Navy Official Website] Accessed 30 August 2008] The RAN is divided into seven Force Element Groups (FEG); Surface Combatants, Amphibious Warfare Forces and Afloat Support Force, Naval Aviation, Submarine Force, Mine Warfare and Clearance Diving, Patrol Boat Force and the Hydrographic Force. The FEG's were formed to manage the operations of the separate sections of the RAN in a more efficient way. [ [http://www.navy.gov.au/fegs/ Royal Australian Navy Website] Accessed 5 November, 2006Dead link|date=August 2008]
The modern RAN began to form during the late 1970s when the Fraser Government announced the purchase of four "Oliver Hazard Perry" class frigates, all to be built in America; in 1980 they announced an additional two vessels both to be built in Australia. The fifteen Australian-built vessels of the "Fremantle" class made up Australia's patrol boat from 1979 to 2007; they have now been replaced by the fourteen "Armidale" class patrol boats.
The "Collins" class is the newest class of Australian submarines, built in Australia for the Royal Australian Navy. They were constructed by the
Australian Submarine Corporationin Adelaide, South Australia, and replace the six "Oberon" class submarines in the Australian fleet. The first vessel HMAS "Collins" was laid down in 1990 and commissioned in 1996, with all six vessels of the class in service and based at HMAS "Stirling" in Western Australia.
The "Anzac" class is the current main fleet unit of the Royal Australian Navy; the class is comprised of eight vessels. The lead vessel of the class. HMAS "Anzac", was commissioned in 1996 and the final vessel, HMAS "Perth", was commissioned on 26 August 2006. In addition to the eight Australian vessels, two "Anzacs" were also constructed for the
Royal New Zealand Navy. The "Anzac" class were jointly constructed in New Zealand and Australia with the final fitout in Williamstown, Victoria.
The amphibious and supply arm of the RAN is made up of; two "Kanimbla" class landing platform, one heavy landing ship (HMAS "Tobruk"), six "Balikpapan" class landing craft, two "Leeuwin" class survey ships, four "Paluma" class motor launches, one fleet oiler (HMAS "Sirius") and the Dual Stores Replenishment Vessel HMAS "Success". The RAN also has six "Huon" class minehunters.
The Royal Australian Navy maintains several bases around Australia. Under the RAN's Two-Ocean Policy two of these HMAS "Stirling" (Fleet Base West) and HMAS "Kuttabul" (Fleet Base East) are the base for all major fleet unit of the RAN. The majority of the patrol boat and amphibious fleets are located at HMAS "Cairns" and HMAS "Coonawarra" while all Fleet Air Arm squadrons are located at HMAS "Albatross" in
New South Wales.
The future of the RAN
In 2000, a major
white paperwas produced by the Australian Government, which set out a program of defence spending that will see significant improvements to the RAN's fleet and capabilities.
The most significant current project is "Sea4000" the procurement of three "Hobart" class destroyers, which will replace the "Adelaide" class. [ [http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/msd/sea4000/sea4000.cfm Sea 4000] ] These ships will be fitted with the AEGIS combat system, and will be based on the Spanish F100 design. The class has a planned in service date of 2013, with the three units to be named "Hobart", "Brisbane", and "Sydney".
In August 2005 the Australian Government passed approval for the acquisition of two "Canberra" class large amphibious ships; these will displace over 20,000 tonnes, have the capability to carry over 1,000 troops, and will potentially be able to operate fixed wing aircraft. The project is expected to cost between Au$1.5 and Au$2 billion, and be completed by around 2014. The new ships will be named "Canberra" and "Adelaide". [ [http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/lsp/amphibs.cfm Defence Materiel Organisation website] Accessed 4 November, 2006]
Royal Australian Navy
Military History of Australia
History of the Royal Navy
* F. Burnell, How Australia took German New Guinea : an illustrated record of the Australian Naval & Military Expeditionary Force
* Tom Frame (2004). "No Pleasure Cruise. The Story of the Royal Australian Navy". Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
* Macdougall, A, 1991. Australians at War A Pictorial History, The Five Mile Press, ISBN 1-86503-865-2
* Greg Nash and David Stevens (2006) "Australia's Navy in the Gulf. From Countenance to Catalyst, 1941-2006". Topmill, Sydney.
* David Stevens (2001). "The Royal Australian Navy - A History". Oxford University Press, ISBN 0195555422
* David Stevens (1996). "The Royal Australian Navy in World War II". Allen & Unwin, Sydney, ISBN 1741141842
* David Stevens (2005), [http://www.navy.gov.au/w/index.php/Publication:Papers_in_Australian_Maritime_Affairs_No._15 RAN Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs No. 15 "A Critical Vulnerability: The impact of the submarine threat on Australia's maritime defence 1915 - 1954"] . Seapower Centre - Australia, Canberra. ISBN 0-642-29625-1
* David Stevens " [http://ajrp.awm.gov.au/AJRP/AJRP2.nsf/437f72f8ac2c07238525661a00063aa6/225b90b97196e29bca256a1d00130203?OpenDocument Japanese submarine operations against Australia 1942-1944] "
Official History of Australia in the War of 1914-1918
** A.W. Jose. [http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/chapter.asp?volume=104 "Volume IX – The Royal Australian Navy, 1914 – 1918 (9th edition, 1941)"] .
Australian War Memorial, Canberra.
Australia in the War of 1939–1945
** G. Herman Gill (1957). [http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/chapter.asp?volume=24 "Australia in the War of 1939 – 1945. Series 2 – Navy. Volume I – 1942"] .
Australian War Memorial, Canberra.
** G. Herman Gill (1968). [http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/chapter.asp?volume=25 "Australia in the War of 1939 – 1945. Series 2 – Navy. Volume II – Royal Australian Navy, 1942 – 1945"] .
Australian War Memorial, Canberra.
** Gavin Long (1973) "The Six Years War. A Concise History of Australia in the 1939-45 War". Australian War Memorial and Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
* Royal Australian Navy Sea Power Centre
** [http://www.navy.gov.au/Publication:Semaphore Semaphore Series - Newsletter of the Sea Power Centre - Australia]
** [http://www.navy.gov.au/Publication:Australian_Maritime_Doctrine Australian Maritime Doctrine]
** [http://www.navy.gov.au/History RAN Histories]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.