Corneal topography

Corneal topography
Intervention
A corneal topogram of an eye affected by keratoconus. Blue shows the flattest areas, and red the steepest.
MeSH	D019781

Corneal topography, also known as photokeratoscopy or videokeratography, is a non-invasive medical imaging technique for mapping the surface curvature of the cornea, the outer structure of the eye. Since the cornea is normally responsible for some 70% of the eye's refractive power,^[1] its topography is of critical importance in determining the quality of vision.

The three-dimensional map is therefore a valuable aid to the examining ophthalmologist or optometrist and can assist in the diagnosis and treatment of a number of conditions; in planning refractive surgery such as LASIK and evaluation of its results; or in assessing the fit of contact lenses. A development of keratoscopy, corneal topography extends the measurement range from the four points a few millimeters apart that is offered by keratometry to a grid of thousands of points covering the entire cornea. The procedure is carried out in seconds and is completely painless.

Operation

The patient is seated facing a bowl containing an illuminated pattern, most commonly a series of concentric rings. The pattern is focused on the anterior surface of the patient's cornea and reflected back to a digital camera at the centre of the bowl. The topology of the cornea is revealed by the shape taken by the reflected pattern. A computer provides the necessary analysis, typically determining the position and height of several thousand points across the cornea. The topographical map can be represented in a number of graphical formats, such as a sagittal map, which color-codes the steepness of curvature according to its dioptric value.

Development

A Medmont E300 topographer

The corneal topograph owes its heritage to 1880, when the Portuguese ophthalmologist Antonio Placido viewed a painted disk (Placido's disk) of alternating black and white rings reflected in the cornea.^[2] The rings showed as contour lines projected on the corneal epithelium. In 1896, Allvar Gullstrand incorporated the disk in his ophthalmoscope, examining photographs of the cornea via a microscope and was able to manually calculate the curvature by means of a numerical algorithm. Gullstrand recognized the potential of the technique and commented that despite its laboriousness it could "give a resultant accuracy that previously could not be obtained in any other way".^[3] The flat field of Placido's disk reduced the accuracy close to the corneal periphery and in the 1950s the Wesley-Jessen company made use of a curved bowl to reduce the field defects.^[2] The curvature of the cornea could be determined from comparison of photographs of the rings against standardized images.

In the 1980s, photographs of the projected images became hand-digitized and then analysed by computer. Automation of the process soon followed with the image captured by a digital camera and passed directly to a computer.^[4] In the 1990s, systems became commercially available from a number of suppliers. The first completely automatic system was the Corneal Modeling System (CMS-1) developed by Computed Anatomy, Inc. in New York City. The price of the early instruments was initially very high ($75,000), largely confining their use to research establishments. However, prices have fallen substantially over time, bringing corneal topographs into the budget of smaller clinics and increasing the number of patients that can be examined.

Use

Computerised corneal topography could be employed for diagnostics. For example, the KISA% index (keratometry, I-S, skew percentage, astigmatism) is used to arrive at a diagnosis of keratoconus, to screen the suspect keratoconic patients and analyse the degree of corneal steepness changes in healthy relatives.^[5]

Never the less, topography in itself is a measurement of the first reflective surface of the eye (tearfilm) and is not giving any additional information beside the shape of this layer expressed in curvature. keratoconus in itself is a pattern of the entire cornea, therefore every measurement just focusing on one layer, might not be enough for a state of the art diagnosis. Esspecially early cases of keratoconus might be missed by a plane topographic measuremet, which is critical if a refractive surgery might be considered. Source:(http://www.osnsupersite.com/view.aspx?rid=18013)

The measurement is also pretty sensitive with an unstable tearfilm. Also the alignment of the measurement can be difficult, esspecially with eyes which have Keratoconus, a significant astigmatism or sometimes after refractive surgery.

Notes

1. ^ Pavan-Langston, Deborah (2007). Manual of Ocular Diagnosis and Therapy. Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 405. ISBN 0-7817-6512-9. 
2. ^ ^{a b} Goss D, Gerstman D (2000). "The Optical Science Underlying the Quantification of Corneal Contour:". Indiana Journal of Optometry 3 (1). http://www.opt.indiana.edu/IndJOpt/ijosum00.pdf. 
3. ^ Gullstrand A (1909). "Procedure of rays in the eye". Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics. 
4. ^ Busin M, Wilmanns I, Spitznas M. Automated corneal topography: computerized analysis of photokeratoscope images. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1989;227(3):230-6. PMID 2737484
5. ^ Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K (October 1999). "KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus". J Cataract Refract Surg 25 (10): 1327–35. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00195-9. PMID 10511930. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0886-3350(99)00195-9. 

References

• Yanoff M, Duker J (2004). Ophthalmology (2nd ed.). Mosby. ISBN 0-323-01634-0. 

Further reading

• Corbett M, O'Brart D, Rosen E and Stevenson R (1999). Corneal Topography. London: BMJ Books. p. 230. ISBN 0-7279-1226-7.