Sacred Name Bibles

Sacred Name Bibles

The term Sacred Name Bibles and the term sacred-name versions[1] are used in general sources to refer to editions of the Bible that are usually connected with the Sacred Name Movement.[2] A specific definition of Sacred Name Bibles is Bible "translations that consistently use Hebraic forms of God's name in both the Old and New Testaments" [3]

The term is not used in general sources to refer to mainstream Bible editions such as the Jerusalem Bible which employs the name "Yahweh" in the English text of only the Old Testament, where traditional English versions have "LORD".[4]

Most "Sacred Name" versions also use a Semitic form of the name Jesus.[3] The Jehovah's Witnesses' New World Translation also employs "Jehovah", a form of Yahweh, in New Testament verses which quote the Old Testament, but does not do this throughout, and is not considered a "Sacred Name Bible" by the above definition or either in Sacred Name Movement nor Watchtower Society sources, though some authors have noted a connection.[5] None of these Sacred Name Bibles "are published by well-established publishers. Instead, most are published by the same group that produced the translation. Some are available for download on the Web."[6]

Contents

Historical background

The Tetragrammation (Hebrew YHWH) occurs in the Hebrew Old Testament, and also (written in Hebrew within the Greek text) in a few of the manuscripts of the Greek translation of the Old Testament, found at Qumran among the Dead Sea Scrolls. Although the Greek forms Iao and Iave do occur in magical inscriptions, generally Hellenistic Jewish texts, such as the works of Philo, Josephus and the New Testament, use the word Kyrios, "Lord", when citing verses where YHWH occurs in the Hebrew.[7] Translators of Sacred Name Bibles argue that Sacred Name Bibles are about restoring the original Name back to the text, usually because of a desire to know Yahweh.[citation needed] For centuries, Hebrew-language editions of the New Testament have included in their text ha-Shem "the Name" or the Tetragrammaton rather than "Lord" or similar.[citation needed]

For centuries, Bible translators around the world did not transliterate or copy the tetragrammaton in their translations. For example, English Bible translators (Christian and Jewish) used "LORD" to represent it. Many authors on Bible translation have explicitly called for translating it with a vernacular word or phrase that would be locally meaningful. [8][9][10] The Catholic church has formally called for translating the Tetragrammaton into other languages rather than attempting to preserve the sounds of the Hebrew.[11]

But a few other Bible translators, with varying theological motivations, have taken a different approach to translating the Tetragrammaton. In the 1800s–1900s at least three English translations contained a variation of the Name [12] In some cases, these translations were of only a portion of the New Testament; they did not represent a stated effort to restore the Name throughout the body of the New Testament. However, in the twentieth century the first translation to employ a full transliteration of the Tetragrammaton was the Rotherham's Emphasized Bible, but his translation only does so in the Old Testament. Angelo Traina's translation, The New Testament of our Messiah and Saviour Yahshua in 1950, then The Holy Name Bible containing the Holy Name Version of the Old and New Testaments in 1963 was the first to systematically use a Hebrew form for sacred names throughout the New Testament, the first complete Sacred Name Bible. The Jerusalem Bible in 1966 and over a dozen other translations in the years since used the name "Yahweh" in the Old Testament.

Aramaic Primacy

Some translators of Sacred Name Bibles hold to the view that the New Testament, or at least significant portions of it, were originally written in a Semitic language, Hebrew or Aramaic, from which the Greek text is a translation, seen as deficient in not having preserved the Hebraic forms of names, particularly sacred names.[citation needed] This view is colloquially known as "Aramaic primacy", and is also taken by some academics, such as Matthew Black.[13][14] Therefore, translators of Sacred Name Bibles[who?] consider it appropriate to use Semitic names in their translations of the New Testament, which they regard as being intended for use by all people, not just Jews (The Sacred Name 2002: 89ff). Though no early manuscripts of the New Testament contain these names, some Hebrew translations from the Latin did use the Tetragrammaton in part of the Hebrew New Testament. Sidney Jellicoe in The Septuagint and Modern Study (Oxford, 1968) states that the name YHWH appeared in Greek Old Testament texts written for Jews by Jews, often in paleo-Hebraic square script to indicate that it was not to be pronounced, or in Aramaic, or using the four Greek letters PIPI (Π Ι Π Ι that physically imitate the appearance of Hebrew YHWH), and that Kyrios was a Christian introduction.[15] Bible scholars and translators such as Eusebius and Jerome (translator of the Latin Vulgate) consulted the Hexapla, but did not attempt to preserve sacred names in Semitic forms. Justin Martyr (second century) argued that YHWH is not a personal name, writing of the “namelessness of God”. [16]

George Lamsa, the translator of The Holy Bible from Ancient Eastern Manuscripts: Containing the Old and New Testaments (1957) believed the New Testament was originally written in a Semitic language (the terms Syriac and Aramaic are not always clearly differentiated by some). However, despite his adherence to a Semitic original of the New Testament, Lamsa translated using the English word "Lord" instead of some Hebraic form of the divine name.

Accuracy or popularity

Sacred Name Bibles are not used frequently within Christianity, even less (if at all) in Judaism. Similarly, only a few translations replace Jesus with Semitic forms such as Yeshua or Yahshua. Most English Bible translations translate the Tetragrammaton with Lord where it occurs in the Old Testament and do not transliterate (“bring over the sound”) into the English. These same patterns are found in languages around the world, as translators have translated sacred names without striving to preserve the Hebraic forms, often using local names for the creator or highest deity,[17][9] conceptualizing accuracy as semantic rather than phonetic.

The limited number of Sacred Name Bibles suggests that phonetic accuracy is not considered to be of importance by mainstream Bible translators. The translator Joseph Bryant Rotherham lamented not making his work in to a Sacred Name Bible by using the more accurate name Yahweh in his translation (pp. 20 – 26), though he also said, "I trust that in a popular version like the present my choice will be understood even by those who may be slow to pardon it." (p. xxi).

Complete Sacred Name Bibles

The following versions are Bibles which systematically use some transliteration the Tetragramamton (usually "Yahweh") in both the Old and New Testament as well as a Semitic form of the name of Jesus such as Yahshua or Yeshua. These Bibles apply this to both the names of the Father and Son, both of which are considered to be sacred. [18]

  • The New Testament of our Messiah and Saviour Yahshua (1950)
  • Holy Name Bible (1963)
  • The Sacred Scriptures Bethel Edition (1981)
  • The Book of Yahweh: The Holy Scriptures (1987)
  • Sacred Scriptures, Family of Yah Edition (2000)
  • The Word of Yahweh (2003)
  • Hebraic Roots Bible (2009)
  • The Restoration Study Bible (2011)
  • Restoration of Original Sacred Name Bible (1970) [19]

Tetragrammaton Sacred Name Bibles

The following versions of Sacred Name Bibles only contain the Tetragrammaton without any vowels so that the reader is unable to read the Name except by pronouncing each of the four letters in English or in Hebrew. They follow this practice in both the Old and New Testaments (though some translations are not complete).

  • The Scriptures '98 Version (1998)
  • Hebraic-Roots Version "New Testament" (2001)
  • Hebraic-Roots Version (2004)
  • Zikarown Say'fer Memorial Scroll (2004)
  • Restoration Scriptures: True Name Edition (2004)
  • Sacred Name King James Bible (2005)
  • The Seventh Millennium Version (2007)
  • The Aramaic English New Testament (2008)
  • Abrahamic Faith Nazarene Hebraic Study Scriptures (2010)
  • His Name Tanakh (In Progress)
  • The Human Instruction Manual (In Progress)
  • Halleluyah Scriptures: Free Restored Name Scriptures (2011) A translation copied from the 1993 THE SCRIPTURES, translated by Institute for Scripture Research, with minor changes, and footnotes removed.
  • The Besorah (2008)[20]

Limited Sacred Name Bibles

The following versions are those where either "Yahweh" or "Jehovah" is limited to use in the Old Testament. Unlike other Sacred Name Bibles, these are usually published by general publishers.

Other

In addition to these English translations, an Indonesian translation produced by the Sacred Name Movement, Kitab Suci, uses Hebraic forms of sacred names in the Old and New Testaments (Soesilo 2001:416), based on Shellabear's translation. A French translation, by André Chouraqui, also uses Hebraic forms in the Old and New Testaments.[21]

Footnotes in the Bible

Though not Sacred Name Bibles themselves, there are many Bibles which in their footnotes or preface, though not in the scriptural texts, indicate the original Hebrew form of the Tetragrammaton in the Old Testament, but never make any suggestions of the Tetragrammaton being used or hinted at in the New Testament.

See also

References

  1. ^ Ernest S. Frerichs The Bible and Bibles in America 1988 "Unlike the other sacred-name versions, pronouns referring to the deity are not capitalized."
  2. ^ J. Gordon Melton Encyclopedia of Protestantism 2005 p480 "More recently several other Sacred Name Bibles have appeared. The movement has remained relatively small and splintered as individuals disagreed over exactly how the names should be spelled."
  3. ^ a b Unseth, Peter. 2011. Sacred Name Bible translations in English: a fast-growing phenomenon. The Bible Translator 62.3: 185.
  4. ^ Rhodes R. The Complete Guide to Bible Translations: How They Were Developed 2009 p206 "Unlike most other translations today, the New Jerusalem Bible renders the Old Testament name for God, YHWH, as “Yahweh,” just as the Jerusalem Bible did. In place of “Lord of hosts” is “Yahweh Sabaoth"
  5. ^ e.g. Robert M. Bowman, Jr., J. Ed Komoszewski, Darrell L. Bock Putting Jesus in His Place: The Case for the Deity of Christ p2007 p158 "best known for advocating this is theory, of course, the Jehovah's Witnesses , whose New World Translation “restores” ... New Testament 237 times.9 Other “ sacred name” groups (such as the Assemblies of Yahweh) make a similar claim "
  6. ^ Unseth, Peter. 2011. Sacred Name Bible translations in English: a fast-growing phenomenon. The Bible Translator 62.3: 190.
  7. ^ Aland, K. Text of the New Testament
  8. ^ David Moomo. 2005. Translating YHWH into African languages. Scriptura 88: 151-60.
  9. ^ a b Ernst R. Wendland. 1992. yhwh- The Case For Chauta ‘Great-[God]-of-the-Bow’. The Bible Translator. 43.4: 430-438.
  10. ^ Helmut Rosin. 1956. The Lord Is God: The Translation of the Divine Names and the Missionary Calling of the Church. Amsterdam: Netherlands Bible Society.
  11. ^ "In accordance with immemorial tradition which in deed is already evident in the above-mentioned 'Septuagint' version, the name of almighty God, expressed by the sacred Hebrew tetragrammaton (YHWH) and rendered in Latin by the word Dominus, is to be rendered in any vernacular by a word of equivalent meaning." Liturgiam authenticam, fifth instruction on vernacular translation of the Roman liturgy, Issue 5, section 41c. Congregatio de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum. 2001. ISBN 157455428X.
  12. ^
    • A Literal Translation of the New Testament, by Herman Heinfetter (1863)[citation needed]
    • The Epistles of Paul in Modern English, by George Barker Stevens (1898)[citation needed]
    • St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans, by W. G. Rutherford (1900)[citation needed]
  13. ^ Black, Matthew. “An Aramaic Approach to the Gospels and Acts”. Oxford Clarendon 1967.
  14. ^ Cross F.L “Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church”. London: Oxford University Press, 1961
  15. ^ Peter M. Head Christology and the Synoptic problem: an argument for Markan priority p161 "Jellicoe summarises: LXX texts, written by Jews for Jews, retained the Divine Name in Hebrew Letters (palaeo-Hebrew or "
  16. ^ Justin Martyr, Hortatory Address, ch. 21
  17. ^ David Moomo. 2005. Translating YHWH into African languages. Scriptura 88:151-160.
  18. ^ Sacred Scriptures Bethel Edition Bible. Preface, V. "No translation has accurately restored the Name Yahweh to the New Testament text where it undoubtedley appeared when the apostolic asuthors produced their works, nor is there a translation that has faithfully restored the Saviours true Name, Yahshua the Messiah, to the text of the Bible", Jacob O. Meyer
  19. ^ [1]
  20. ^ A check of several passages shows no differences between The Besorah and the The Scriptures produced 10 years earlier by a different publisher (except Besoarah's occasional use of bold text and a different Hebrew script). The text was not authorized by the original publisher, Institute for Scripture Research - it is a plagiarism. [2]|| 2008 || Yahuah || Yahusha
  21. ^ Chouraqui's French translation online

Bibliography

  • Bivin, David. 1991a. “Jehovah”—A Christian Misunderstanding. Jerusalem Perspective Vol. 4.6: 5,6.
  • Bivin, David. 1991b. The Fallacy of Sacred Name Bibles. Jerusalem Perspective Vol. 4.6: 7,12.
  • Neufeld, Don. 1962. An examination of the claims of the Sacred Name Movement (concluded). The Ministry 35.11: 13-16, 36.
  • Pritz, Ray. 1991. The Divine Name in the Hebrew New Testament. Jerusalem Perspective, Vol. 4:2 10-12.
  • Rösel, Martin. 2007. The Reading and Translation of the Divine Name in the Masoretic Tradition and the Greek Pentateuch. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 31.4: 411-428.
  • Smith, Mark S. 2010. God in Translation: Deities in Cross-Cultural Discourse in the Biblical World. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing.
  • Soesilo, Daud. 2001. Translating the Names of God: recent experience from Indonesia and Malaysia. The Bible Translator 52.4:414-423.
  • The Sacred Name YHWH: A Scriptural Study, (3rd ed). 2002. Garden Grove, CA: Qadesh La Yahweh Press.
  • The Scriptures 1998. Northriding, South Africa: Institute for Scripture Research.
  • Trimm, James (translator) 2005. The Hebraic-Roots Version Scriptures. Institute for Scripture Research (publisher).
  • Unseth, Peter. 2011. Sacred Name Bible translations in English: a fast-growing phenomenon. The Bible Translator 62.3: 185-194.

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Sacred name Bibles — Sacred name BiblesA number of sacred name Bible translations have been done in English with the specific aim of carrying into English the actual names of God as they were in the originals. Some have been done by people from the Sacred Name… …   Wikipedia

  • Sacred Name Movement — This article is about the Adventist movement. See sacred name for the theological term. The Sacred Name Movement (SNM) is a movement within Adventism in Christianity, propagated by Clarence Orvil Dodd from the 1930s, that claims to seek to… …   Wikipedia

  • Sacred Name movement —    Members of the Sacred Name movement use the original Hebrew names and terms for the Lord, God, and/or Jesus in their translations, prayers, and/or church names. Since the start of the 20th century, Adventist churches have been concerned about… …   Encyclopedia of Protestantism

  • Restored Name King James Version — The Restored Name King James Version is a revision of the King James Bible which uses the Hebrew tetragrammaton YHWH for the name of God. This is one of several sacred name Bibles in English, produced with the explicit goal of printing God s name …   Wikipedia

  • Picture Bibles — • In the Middle Ages the Church made use of pictures as a means of instruction, to supplement the knowledge acquired by reading or oral teaching Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Picture Bibles     Picture Bibles …   Catholic encyclopedia

  • Polyglot Bibles — • The first Bible which may be considered a Polyglot is that edited at Alcala, Spain, in 1502 17 . . . Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Polyglot Bibles     Polyglot Bibles …   Catholic encyclopedia

  • Modern English Bible translations — The Bible in English Old English (pre 1066) Middle English (1066–1500) Early Modern English (1500–1800) Modern Christian (1800–) Modern Jewish (1853–) Miscellaneous This box …   Wikipedia

  • Paleo-Hebrew alphabet — Type Abjad …   Wikipedia

  • Bible translations —    The Protestant Reformation believed that the Bible was the property of every believer. The successful effort to translate the Bible into the spoken language of Christians (using the best Hebrew and Greek texts for sources) was instrumental in… …   Encyclopedia of Protestantism

  • Yahweh — noun a) the name of the God of Israel worshipped by the Jahwist prophets in the kingdoms of Israel and Judah in antiquity b) in Sacred Name Bibles , translating the Tetragrammaton Syn: Yahuwah, Jah, Jehovah, יהוה, YHVH …   Wiktionary

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”