The Septuagint (,
Josephus[Antiquities 12.57, 12.86] , or an elision. ...this name "Septuagint" appears to have been a fourth- to fifth-century development."] means "seventy" in Latin and derives from a tradition that seventy (or seventy-two) Jewish scholars translated the Pentateuch(Torah) from Hebrew into Greek for Ptolemy II Philadelphus, 285–246 BC. [ Letter of Aristeas] Jennifer M. Dines, "The Septuagint," Michael A. Knibb, Ed., London: T&T Clark, 2004]
The Septuagint includes some books not found in the
Hebrew Bible. Many ProtestantBibles follow the Jewish canon and exclude the additional books. Roman Catholics, however, include some of these books in their canon while Eastern OrthodoxChurches use all the books of the Septuagint. Anglicanlectionaries also use all of the books except Psalm 151, and the full Authorized (King James) Version includes these additional books in a separate section labelled the "Apocrypha". The Septuagint was held with great respect in ancient times; Philoand Josephusascribed divine inspiration to its authors. Besides the Old Latin versions, the LXX is also the basis for the Slavonic, Syro-Hexaplar (but not the Peshitta), Old Armenian, Old Georgian and Coptic versions of the Old Testament. Ernst Würthwein, "The Text of the Old Testament," trans. Errol F. Rhodes, Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1995. ] Of significance for all Christians and for Bible scholars, the LXX is quoted by the Christian New Testamentand by the Apostolic Fathers. While Jews have not used the LXX in worship or religious study since the second century AD, recent scholarship has brought renewed interest in it in Judaic Studies. Some of the Dead Sea scrollsattest to Hebrew texts other than those on which the Masoretic Textwas based; in many cases, these newly found texts accord with the LXX version. The oldest surviving codices of LXX ( Codex Vaticanusand Codex Sinaiticus) date to the fourth century AD.
Creation of the Septuagint
Jewish scholars first translated the Torah into
Koine Greekin the third century BC [Josephus, Flavius, "Antiquities of the Jews", 12.2.11-15; Whiston, William; "The Complete Works of Josephus"; Hendrickson Publishers, (Nashville, Tennessee, 1987); ISBN 0-913573-86-8] . Further books were translated over the next two centuries. It is not altogether clear which was translated when, or where; some may even have been translated twice, into different versions, and then revised. [Joel Kalvesmaki, [http://www.kalvesmaki.com/LXX/ The Septuagint] ] The quality and style of the different translators also varied considerably from book to book, from the literal to paraphrasing to interpretative. According to one assessment "the Pentateuch is reasonably well translated, but the rest of the books, especially the poetical books, are often very poorly done and even contain sheer absurdities". [Sir Godfrey Driver, [http://www.bible-researcher.com/driver1.html Introduction to the Old Testament of the New English Bible] (1970)]
As the work of translation progressed gradually, and new books were added to the collection, the compass of the Greek Bible came to be somewhat indefinite. The Pentateuch always maintained its pre-eminence as the basis of the canon; but the prophetic collection changed its aspect by having various
hagiographaincorporated into it. Some of the newer works, those called "anagignoskomena" in Greek, are not included in the Jewish canon. Among these books are Maccabees and the Wisdom of Ben Sira. Also, the Septuagint version of some works, like Daniel and Esther, are longer than those in the Masoretic Text. [Rick Grant Jones, "Various Religious Topics," " [http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Pines/7224/Rick/Septuagint/sp_books.html Books of the Septuagint] ," (Accessed 2006.9.5).] Some of the later books (Wisdom of Solomon, 2 Maccabees, and others) apparently were composed in Greek. [See Books of the Bible]
The authority of the larger group of writings, out of which the "
ketuvim" were selected, had not yet been determined, although some sort of selective process must have been employed because the Septuagint did not include other well-known Jewish documents such as Enoch or Jubilees or other writings that are now part of the Pseudepigrapha. It is not known what principles were used to determine the contents of the Septuagint beyond the "Law and the Prophets", a phrase used several times in the New Testament.
Naming and designation
The Septuagint derives its name from
Latin"septuaginta interpretum versio", (Greek: "ἡ μετάφρασις τῶν ἑβδομήκοντα", "ē metráfrasis tōn hebomēkonta") "translation of the seventy-two interpreters, six from each tribe" (hence the abbreviation LXX). The Latin title refers to a legendary account in the pseudepigraphic Letter of Aristeas of how seventy-two Jewish scholars were asked by the Greek King of Egypt Ptolemy II Philadelphusin the 3rd century BC to translate the Torahfor inclusion in the Library of Alexandria. A later version of that legend narrated by Philo of Alexandriastates that although the translators were kept in separate chambers, they all produced identical versions of the text in seventy-two days. Although this story may be improbable, it underlines the fact that some ancient Jews wished to present the translation as authoritative. A version of this legend is found in the Tractate Megillah of the Babylonian Talmud (pages 9a-9b), which identifies fifteen specific unusual translations made by the scholars. Only two of these translations are found in the extant LXX.
Modern scholarship holds that the LXX was written during the 3rd through 1st centuries BC. But nearly all attempts at dating specific books, with the exception of the
Pentateuch(early- to mid-3rd century BC), are tentative and without consensus.
Later Jewish revisions and
recensions of the Greek against the Hebrew are well attested, the most famous of which include "the Three:" Aquila (AD 128), Symmachus, and Theodotion. These three, to varying degrees, are more literal renderings of their contemporary Hebrew scriptures as compared to the Old Greek. Modern scholars consider one or more of the 'three' to be totally new Greek versions of the Hebrew Bible. [Compare Dines, who is certain only of Symmachus being a truly new version, with Würthwein, who considers only Theodotion to be a revision, and even then possibly of an earlier non-LXX version.]
Around AD 235,
Origen, a Christian scholar in Alexandria, completed the Hexapla, a comprehensive comparison of the ancient versions and Hebrew text side-by-side in six columns, with diacritical markings (a.k.a. "editor's marks", "critical signs" or "Aristarchian signs"). Much of this work was lost, but several compilations of the fragments are available. In the first column was the contemporary Hebrew, in the second a Greek transliteration of it, then the newer Greek versions each in their own columns. Origen also kept a column for the Old Greek (the Septuagint) and next to it was a critical apparatus combining readings from all the Greek versions with diacritical marks indicating to which version each line (Gr. στἰχος) belonged. [Jerome, [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf101.vii.1.LXXII.html From Jerome, Letter LXXI] (404 AD), NPNF1-01. "The Confessions and Letters of St. Augustin, with a Sketch of his Life and Work," Phillip Schaff, Ed.] Perhaps the voluminous Hexapla was never copied in its entirety, but Origen's combined text ("the fifth column") was copied frequently, eventually without the editing marks, and the older uncombined text of the LXX was neglected. Thus this combined text became the first major Christian recension of the LXX, often called the "Hexaplar recension". In the century following Origen, two other major recensions were identified by Jerome, who attributed these to Lucian and Hesychius.
The oldest manuscripts of the LXX include 2nd century BC fragments of Leviticus and Deuteronomy (Rahlfs nos. 801, 819, and 957), and 1st century BC fragments of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, and the Minor Prophets (Rahlfs nos. 802, 803, 805, 848, 942, and 943). Relatively complete manuscripts of the LXX postdate the Hexaplar rescension and include the
Codex Vaticanusand the Codex Sinaiticusof the 4th centuryand the Codex Alexandrinusof the 5th century. These are indeed the oldest surviving nearly-complete manuscripts of the Old Testament in any language; the oldest extant complete Hebrew texts date some 600 years later, from the first half of the 10th century. While there are differences between these three codices, scholarly consensus today holds that one LXX — that is, the original pre-Christian translation — underlies all three. The various Jewish and later Christian revisions and recensions are largely responsible for the divergence of the codices.
Relationship between the Septuagint and the Masoretic text
The sources of the many differences between the Septuagint and the
Masoretic texthave long been discussed by scholars. The most widely accepted view today is that the original Septuagint provided a reasonably accurate record of an early Semitic textual variant, now lost, that differed from ancestors of the Masoretic text. Ancient scholars, however, did not suspect this. Early Christians—who were largely unfamiliar with Hebrew texts, and were thus only made aware of the differences through the newer Greek versions—tended to dismiss the differences as a product of uninspired translation of the Hebrew in these new versions. Following the Renaissance, a common opinion among some humanists was that the LXX translators bungled the translation from the Hebrew and that the LXX became more corrupt with time. The discovery of many fragments in the Dead Sea scrollsthat agree with the Septuagint rather than the Masoretic Text proved that many of the variants in Greek were also present in early Semitic manuscripts. [Jones, Table: [http://www.geocities.com/r_grant_jones/Rick/Septuagint/spappendix.htm Dead Sea Scrolls-Septuagint Alignments Against the Masoretic Text] .]
These issues notwithstanding, the text of the LXX is in general close to that of the Masoretic. For example, Genesis 4:1-6 is identical in both the LXX and the Masoretic Text. Likewise, Genesis 4:8 to the end of the chapter is the same. There is only one noticeable difference in that chapter, at 4:7, to wit:
Genesis 4:7, LXX (NETS)
Genesis 4:7, Masoretic (
NRSV) If you offer correctly but do not divide correctly, have you not sinned? Be still; his recourse is to you, and you will rule over him. If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is lurking at the door; its desire is for you, but you must master it.
This instance illustrates the complexity of assessing differences between the LXX and the Masoretic Text. Despite the striking divergence of meaning here between the two, nearly identical consonantal Hebrew source texts can be reconstructed. The readily apparent semantic differences result from alternative strategies for interpreting the difficult verse and relate to differences in vowelization and punctuation of the consonantal text.
The differences between the LXX and the MT thus fall into four categories. [See, Jinbachian, "Some Semantically Significant Differences Between the Masoretic Text and the Septuagint", [http://184.108.40.206/appendage/labhwp/Jinbachian.doc] .]
:# "Different Hebrew sources for the MT and the LXX". Evidence of this can be found throughout the Old Testament. Most obvious are major differences in Jeremiah and Job, where the LXX is much shorter and chapters appear in different order than in the MT, and Esther where almost one third of the verses in the LXX text have no parallel in the MT. A more subtle example may be found in Isaiah 36.11; the meaning ultimately remains the same, but the choice of words evidences a different text. The MT reads "...al tedaber yehudit be-'ozne ha`am al ha-homa" [speak not the Judean language in the ears of (or — which can be heard by) the people on the wall] . The same verse in the LXX reads according to the translation of Brenton "and speak not to us in the Jewish tongue: and wherefore speakest thou in the ears of the men on the wall." The MT reads "people" where the LXX reads "men". This difference is very minor and does not affect the meaning of the verse. Scholars at one time had used discrepancies such as this to claim that the LXX was a poor translation of the Hebrew original. With the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, variant Hebrew texts of the Bible were found. In fact this verse is found in Qumran (1QIsa"a") where the Hebrew word "haanashim" (the men) is found in place of "haam" (the people). This discovery, and others like it, showed that even seemingly minor differences of translation could be the result of variant Hebrew source texts.:# "Differences in interpretation" stemming from the same Hebrew text. A good example is Genesis 4.7 shown above. :# "Differences as a result of idiomatic translation issues" (i.e. a Hebrew idiom may not easily translate into Greek, thus some difference is intentionally or unintentionally imparted). For example, in Psalm 47:10 the MT reads "The shields of the earth belong to God". The LXX reads "To God are the mighty ones of the earth." The metaphor "shields" would not have made much sense to a Greek speaker; thus the words "mighty ones" are substituted in order to retain the original meaning. :#"Transmission changes in Hebrew or Greek" (Diverging revisionary/recensional changes and copyist errors)
Use of the Septuagint
3rd century BC, most Jewish communities were located in the Hellenistic world, where Greek was the lingua francaof the time, including among the widely spread Jewish communities. It is believed that the LXX was producted because many Jews outside of Judeaneeded a Greek version of the scripture for use during synagoguereadings [ L.L. Grabbe, "Judaism from Cyrus to Hadrian. I. Persian and Greek Periods. II. Roman Period," London: SCM Press, 1994. ] [Joachim Schaper, "Eschatology in the Greek Psalter," Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1995. ] or for religious study [H. Orlinsky, "The Septuagint and its Hebrew Text," in "The Cambridge History of Judaism," vol. II, "The Hellenistic Age," W. Davies and L. Finkelstein, Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. ] . Some also theorise that the LXX was the product of Hellenistic Jews as a contribution to the Hellenistic culture. Alexandria held the greatest diaspora Jewish community of the age and was also a great center of Greek letters. Alexandria is thus likely the site of LXX authorship, a notion supported by the legend of Ptolemy and the 72 scholars. [There is some debate, however, regarding the location of the translations of the non-Pentateuch books. See Dines. One theory, that even the Pentateuch reflects variant "local" forms, is criticized in Emmanuel Tov, "The Text Critical Use of The Septuagint in Biblical Research," 2nd edn., Jerusalem: Simor, 1997. ] The Septuagint enjoyed widespread use in the Hellenistic Jewish diaspora and even in Jerusalem, which had become a rather cosmopolitan (and therefore Greek-speaking) town. Both Philoand Josephusshow a reliance on the Septuagint in their citations of Jewish scripture.
Starting approximately in the
2nd century AD, several factors led most Jews to abandon use of the LXX. The earliest gentileChristians of necessity used the LXX, as it was at the time the only Greek version of the bible, and most, if not all, of these early non-Jewish Christians could not read Hebrew. The association of the LXX with a rival religion may have rendered it suspect in the eyes of the newer generation of Jews and Jewish scholars. Perhaps more importantly, the Greek language—and therefore the Greek Bible—declined among Jews after most of them fled from the Greek-speaking eastern Roman Empireinto the Aramaic-speaking Persian Empirewhen Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans. Instead, Jews used Hebrew/Aramaic Targummanuscripts later compiled by the Masoretes; and authoritative Aramaic translations, such as those of Onkelos and Rabbi Yonathan ben Uziel. [ Greek-speaking Judaism survived, however, on a smaller scale into the medieval period. Cf. Natalio Fernández Marcos, "The Septuagint in Context: Introduction to the Greek Bible," Leiden: Brill, 2000. ]
What was perhaps most significant for the LXX, as distinct from other Greek versions, was that the LXX began to lose Jewish sanction after differences between it and contemporary Hebrew scriptures were discovered. Even Greek-speaking Jews — such as those remaining in Palestine — tended less to the LXX, preferring other Jewish versions in Greek, such as that of Aquila, which seemed to be more concordant with contemporary Hebrew texts.
The early Christian Church used the Greek texts since Greek was a
lingua francaof the Roman Empire at the time, and the language of the Church. In addition the Church Fathers tended to accept Philo's account of the LXX's miraculous and inspired origin. Furthermore, the New Testament writers, when citing the Jewish scriptures or when quoting Jesus doing so, freely used the Greek translation, implying that the Apostles and their followers considered it reliable. H. B. Swete, "An Introduction to the Old Testament in Greek," revised by R.R. Ottley, 1914; reprint, Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1989. ]
Jeromeundertook the revision of the Old Latin translations of the Septuagint, he checked the Septuagint against the Hebrew texts that were then available. He came to believe that the Hebrew text better testified to Christ than the Septuagint [ [http://www.bombaxo.com/blog/?p=214 Jerome's Prologue to Genesis] ] . He broke with church tradition and translated most of the Old Testamentof his Vulgatefrom Hebrew rather than Greek. His choice was severely criticized by Augustine, his contemporary; a flood of still less moderate criticism came from those who regarded Jerome as a forger. But with the passage of time, acceptance of Jerome's version gradually increased until it displaced the Old Latin translations of the Septuagint.
The Hebrew text diverges in some passages that Christians hold to prophesy Christ, and the Eastern Orthodox Church still prefers to use the LXX as the basis for translating the Old Testament into other languages. Fact|date=April 2008 The
Orthodox Church of Constantinople, the Church of Greeceand the Cypriot Orthodox Churchcontinue to use it in their liturgytoday, untranslated. Many modern critical translations of the Old Testament, while using the Masoretic text as their basis, consult the Septuagint as well as other versions in an attempt to reconstruct the meaning of the Hebrew text whenever the latter is unclear, undeniably corrupt, or ambiguous.
Many of the oldest Biblical verses among the
Dead Sea Scrolls, particularly those in Aramaic, correspond more closely with the LXX than with the Masoretic text (although the majority of these variations are extremely minor, e.g. grammatical changes, spelling differences or missing words, and do not affect the meaning of sentences and paragraphs). Timothy McLay, "The Use of the Septuagint in New Testament Research ISBN 0-8028-6091-5." — The current standard introduction on the NT & LXX.] [V.S. Herrell, "The History of the Bible", " [http://www.christianseparatist.org/ast/hist/qumran.htm Qumran: Dead Sea Scrolls.] "] This confirms the scholarly consensus that the LXX represents a separate Hebrew-text tradition from that which was later standardized as the Masoretic text. [ William Priestly, " [http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/article_dss.html The Dead Sea Scrolls] ." — A detailed explanation with scholarly apparatus.]
Language of the Septuagint
Some sections of the Septuagint may show Semiticisms, or idioms and phrases based on Semitic languages like Hebrew and
Aramaic. Other books, such as LXX Daniel and Proverbs, show Greek influence more strongly. The book of Daniel that is found in almost all Greek bibles, however, is not from the LXX, but rather from Theodotion's translation, which more closely resembles the Masoretic Daniel.
The LXX is also useful for elucidating pre-Masoretic Hebrew: many proper nouns are spelled out with Greek vowels in the LXX, while contemporary Hebrew texts lacked vowel pointing. [Hoffman, [http://www.newjewishbooks.org/ITB Book Review,] , 2004.] One must, however, evaluate such evidence with caution since it is extremely unlikely that all ancient Hebrew sounds had precise Greek equivalents. [ Paul Joüon, SJ, "A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew," trans. and revised by T. Muraoka, vol. I, Rome: Editrice Pontificio Instituto Biblico, 2000. ]
Books of the Septuagint
:"See also Table of books below."
All the books of western canons of the
Old Testamentare found in the Septuagint, although the order does not always coincide with the Western ordering of the books. The Septuagint order for the Old Testament is evident in the earliest Christian Bibles (5th century).
Some books that are set apart in the Masoretic text are grouped together. For example the
Books of Samueland the Books of Kingsare in the LXX one book in four parts called Βασιλειῶν ("Of Reigns"); scholars believe that this is the original arrangement before the book was divided for readability. In LXX, the Books of Chroniclessupplement Reigns and it is called Paraleipoménon (Παραλειπομένων—things left out). The Septuagint organizes the minor prophets as twelve parts of one Book of Twelve.
Some scripture of ancient origin are found in the Septuagint but are not present in the Hebrew. These include additions to Daniel and Esther. For more information regarding these books, see the articles
Biblical apocrypha, Biblical canon, Books of the Bible, and Deuterocanonical books.
The New Testament makes a number of allusions to and may quote the additional books (as Orthodox Christians aver). The books are Tobit,
Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Wisdom of Jesus Sirach, Baruch, Epistle of Jeremy (which later became chapter 6 of Baruch in the Vulgate), additions to Daniel (The Prayer of Azarias, the Song of the Three Children, Sosanna and Bel and the Dragon), additions to Esther, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, 3 Maccabees, 4 Maccabees, 1 Esdras, Odes, including the Prayer of Manasses, and Psalm 151. The canonical acceptance of these books varies among different Christian traditions, and there are canonical books not derived from the Septuagint; for a discussion see the article on Biblical apocrypha.
All the printed editions of the Septuagint are derived from the three recensions mentioned above.
* The "
editio princeps" is the Complutensian Polyglot. It was based on manuscripts that are now lost, but seems to transmit quite early readings. [ Joseph Ziegler, "Der griechische Dodekepropheton-Text der Complutenser Polyglotte," "Biblica" 25:297-310, cited in Würthwein. ]
* The Aldine edition (begun by
Aldus Manutius) appeared at Venice in 1518. The text is closer to Codex Vaticanus than the Complutensian. The editor says he collated ancient manuscripts but does not specify them. It has been reprinted several times.
* The most important edition is the Roman or Sixtine, which reproduces the Codex Vaticanus" almost exclusively. It was published under the direction of
Cardinal Caraffa, with the help of various savants, in 1586, by the authority of Sixtus V, to assist the revisers who were preparing the Latin Vulgate edition ordered by the Council of Trent. It has become the textus receptus of the Greek Old Testament and has had many new editions, such as that of Holmes and Pearsons (Oxford, 1798-1827), the seven editions of Constantin von Tischendorf, which appeared at Leipzig between 1850 and 1887, the last two, published after the death of the author and revised by Nestle, the four editions of Henry Barclay Swete(Cambridge, 1887-95, 1901, 1909), etc.
* Grabe's edition was published at Oxford, from 1707 to 1720, and reproduced, but imperfectly, the "Codex Alexandrinus" of London. For partial editions, see
Fulcran Vigouroux, "Dictionnaire de la Bible", 1643 sqq.
* Alfred Rahlfs, a longtime Septuagint researcher at Göttingen, began a pocket edition of the Septuagint in 1917 or 1918. The completed "Septuaginta" was published in 1935. It relies mainly on Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, and Alexandrinus, and presents a critical apparatus with variants from these and several other sources. [Rahlfs, A. (Ed.). (1935/1979). "Septuaginta." Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.]
* The Göttingen Septuagint "(Vetus Testamentum Graecum: Auctoritate Academiae Scientiarum Gottingensis editum)" is a major critical version, comprising multiple volumes published from 1931 to 2006 and not yet complete. Its two critical apparatuses present variant Septuagint readings and variants from other Greek versions. [ [http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/ioscs/editions.html IOSCS: Critical Editions of Septuagint/Old Greek Texts] ]
* In 2006, a revision of Alfred Rahlfs's "Septuaginta" was published by the German Bible Society. This "editio altera" includes over a thousand changes to the text and apparatus. [ [http://www.scholarly-bibles.com/en/search.html?product_show=96 German Bible Society] ]
* [http://www.apostolicbible.com "The Apostolic Bible Polyglot"] contains a Septuagint text derived mainly from the agreement of any two of the Complutensian Polyglot, the Sixtine, and the Aldine texts. [ [http://www.apostolicbible.com/intro.pdf Introduction to the Apostolic Bible] ]
Translations of the Septuagint
The Septuagint has been translated a few times into English, the first one (though excluding the Apocrypha) being that of Charles Thomson in 1808 (his translation was later Revised And Enlarged by C.A. Muses in 1954). The translation of Sir Lancelot C. L. Brenton, published in 1851, is a longtime standard. For most of the time since its publication it has been the only one readily available, and has been in print continually since. It is based primarily upon the
Codex Vaticanusand contains the Greek and English texts in parallel columns. There also is a revision of the Brenton Septuagint available through Stauros Ministries, called "The Apostles' Bible". The latest revision was released in January 2008. [http://www.apostlesbible.com]
A recent interlinear translation (2007) is
The Apostolic Bible Polyglot, which includes the Greek books of the Hebrew canon along with the Greek New Testament, all numerically coded to the AB-Strong numbering system, and set in monotonic orthography. Included in the printed edition is The Lexical Concordance of The Apostolic Bible and The English-Greek Index. Online is The comprehensive Concordance of The Apostolic Bible, The Analytical Lexicon and a grammar.
A new translation into English has recently been completed for use as the Old Testament portion of the
Orthodox Study Bible. This version was released in early 2008, along with extensive commentary from an Eastern Orthodox perspective. [ [http://orthodoxstudybible.com/about About the Orthodox Study Bible] ]
The International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies (IOSCS) has produced "A New English Translation of the Septuagint and the Other Greek Translations Traditionally Included Under that Title " (NETS), an academic translation based on standard critical editions of the Greek texts. It was published by Oxford Press in October 2007.
Eastern / Greek Orthodox Bible(EOB) is an extensive revision and correction of Brenton’s translation which was primarily based on Codex Vaticanus. Its language and syntax has been modernized and simplified. It also includes extensive introductory material and footnotes featuring significant inter-LXX and LXX/MT variants.
Although the integrity of the Septuagint as a text distinct from the Masoretic text is supported by Dead Sea scroll evidence, the LXX does show signs of age in that textual variants are attested. There is at least one highly unreliable nearly complete text of the LXX,
Codex Alexandrinus. Nearly complete texts of the Septuagint are also found in the Codex Vaticanusand Codex Sinaiticus, which do not perfectly coincide. But the LXX is a particularly excellent text when compared to other ancient works with textual variants. It has been argued that it is unjustified to reject the existence of a "Septuagint" merely on the basis of variation due to editorial recension and typographical error. [ [http://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/article_dss.html Priestly] ] [ [http://www.triumphpro.com/a_new_look_at_the_lxx____the_dead_sea_scrolls_and_the_septuagint.htm "A New Look at the Septuagint"] ]
The title "Septuagint" should not to be confused with the seven or more other Greek versions of the Old Testament, most of which do not survive except as fragments. These other Greek versions were once in side-by-side columns of
Origen's Hexapla, now almost wholly lost. Of these the most important are "the three:" those by Aquila, Symmachus, and Theodotion, which are identified by particular Semiticisms and placement of Hebrew and Aramaic characters within their Greek texts.
Table of books
Alfred Rahlfs— editor of a commonly distributed critical edition of LXX.
Documentary hypothesis— discusses the recensional history of the Torah/ Pentateuchin Hebrew.
Tanakh at Qumran— some of the Dead Sea Scrolls are witnesses to the LXX text.
List of Septuagint versions that have the Tetragrammaton
* Kantor, Mattis, "The Jewish time line encyclopedia: A yearby-year history from Creation to the present", Jason Aronson Inc., London, 1992
* [http://www.kalvesmaki.com/LXX/ The Septuagint Online] - Comprehensive site with scholarly discussion and links to texts and translations
* [http://www.twu.ca/sites/septuagint/ The Septuagint Institute]
* [http://jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=1035&letter=B#3077 Jewish Encyclopedia: Bible Translations]
* [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13722a.htm Catholic Encyclopedia: Septuagint Version]
* [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15367a.htm#sept Catholic Encyclopedia: Versions of the Bible]
* [http://www.geocities.com/r_grant_jones/Rick/Septuagint/spindex.htm A thorough analysis of the Septuagint with resources]
* [http://www.exc.com/JoelHoffman/Excerpts/ITB-p95.pdf Comparison of names in the LXX and Hebrew Bible] (
* [https://wwwdbunil.unil.ch/bibil/?MIval=/bi/en/bibilhome&BiMenu=10&BiMain=21&BiTypeRech=5&WINSIZE=100&affiche=2&Submit=1&rech=vedid=2492 Free Online Bibliography (up to date) from BiBIL]
* [http://biblical-studies.ca/lxx/lxx.html Codex: Resources and Links Relating to the Septuagint]
* [http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/rs/rak/earlylxx/earlypaplist.html Extensive chronological and canonical list of Early Papyri and Manuscripts of the Septuagint]
Texts and translations
* [http://www.ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/septuagint/default.asp Elpenor's Bilingual (Greek / English) Septuagint Old Testament] Greek text (full polytonic unicode version) and English translation side by side. Greek text as used by the Orthodox Churches.
* [http://www.jeffzizz.com/septuagint.php Full PDF version of the Septuagint] (without diacritical marks)
* [http://titus.fkidg1.uni-frankfurt.de/texte/etcs/grie/sept/sept.htm Titus Text Collection: Vetus Testamentum graece iuxta LXX interpretes] (advanced research tool)
* [http://www.septuagint.org/LXX/ Septuagint and New Testament] - Greek Text of the Septuagint and NT with
parsingand concordance(no diacritics). Lacks anagignoskomena.
* [http://www.apostoliki-diakonia.gr/bible/bible.asp?contents=old_testament/contents.asp&main=OldTes Septuagint published by the Church of Greece]
* [http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/gopher/text/religion/biblical/lxxmorph/ Plain text of the whole LXX, including the anagignoskomena]
* [http://apostolicbible.com Greek-English interlinear of OT & NT] .
* [http://www.katapi.org.uk Bible Resource Pages] - contains Septuagint texts (with diacritics) side-by-side with English translations
* [http://www.studylight.org/isb/ Greek text] - Complete Greek text (no diacritics, needs special font) hyperlinked to Strong's concordance. Anagignoskomena do not display.
* [http://www.users.dircon.co.uk/~hancock/sept.zip The Septuagint in Greek] as a
MS Worddocument (Requires [http://www.users.dircon.co.uk/~hancock/vudown.htm Vusllius Old Face] . Intro and book abbreviations in Latin.)
* [http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/Danog.htm The Book of Daniel from an Old Greek LXX] (no diacritics, needs special font)
* [http://www.ecmarsh.com/lxx/ Sir Lancelot C.L. Brenton's translation]
* [http://www.ccel.org/bible/brenton/ The Septuagint LXX: Greek and English] partial version of Brenton's edition,
wikitext and PNG images. (difficult navigation)
* [http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/nets/edition/ The New English Translation of the Septuagint (NETS), preliminary edition]
* [http://www.lxx.org Project to produce an Orthodox Study Bible (OSB) whose Old Testament is based entirely on the Septuagint.]
* [http://www.orthodox-church.info/eob/ EOB: Eastern / Greek Orthodox Bible: includes comprehesive introductory materials dealing with Septuagintal issues and an Old Testament which is an extensive revision of the Brenton with footnotes.]
* [http://www.peterpapoutsis.com/ The Holy Orthodox Bible, another English translation project of the Septuagint using the official Greek Orthodox texts]
* [http://christianmedia.us/LXXE/ The Septuagint LXX in English (Online text of the entire LXX English translation by Sir Lancelot Brenton)]
The LXX and the NT
* [http://www.scripturecatholic.com/septuagint.html Septuagint references in NT] by John Salza
* [http://www.geocities.com/r_grant_jones/Rick/Septuagint/splist1.htm The New Testament and the Septuagint] - Instances where the New Testament quotes the LXX against the Masoretic Hebrew
* [http://www.geocities.com/r_grant_jones/Rick/Septuagint/splistMT.htm The New Testament and the Hebrew OT] - Instances where the New Testament quote agrees with the Masoretic Hebrew meaning
* [http://www.christian-thinktank.com/baduseot.html A defense of the quoting of the LXX by the writers of the New Testament.]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.