Ojibwe writing systems

Ojibwe writing systems
A sign in Sioux Lookout, Ontario, with Ojibwe syllabics. The unpointed syllabics text says ᑳᐃᔑᐊᓉᐱᓈᓂᐗᐣᐠ (Gaa-izhi-anwebinaaniwang—"the place where people repose")…but with the last "ᐧ" / "w" missing from the sign.

Ojibwe is an Native American language of the Algonquian family. Ojibwe is one of the largest Native American languages north of Mexico in terms of number of speakers, and is characterized by a series of dialects, some of which differ significantly. The dialects of Ojibwe are spoken in Canada from southwestern Québec, through Ontario, Manitoba and parts of Saskatchewan, with outlying communities in Alberta and British Columbia,[1][2] and in the United States from Michigan through Wisconsin and Minnesota, with a number of communities in North Dakota and Montana, as well as migrant groups in Kansas and Oklahoma.[2][3]

The absence of linguistic or political unity among Ojibwe-speaking groups is associated with the relative autonomy of the regional dialects of Ojibwe.[4] There is no single dialect that is considered the most prestigious or most prominent, and no standard writing system used to represent all dialects.[5] Ojibwe dialects have been written in numerous ways over a period of several centuries, with the development of different written traditions reflecting a range of influences from the orthographic practices of other languages.

Writing systems associated with particular dialects have been developed by adapting the Roman alphabet, usually from English or French writing systems.[6] A widely used Roman character-based writing system is the Double Vowel system, attributed to Charles Fiero. The Double Vowel system is quickly gaining popularity among language teachers in the United States and Canada because of its ease of use.

A syllabic writing system not related to English or French writing is used by some Ojibwe speakers in northern Ontario and Manitoba. Development of the original form of Canadian Aboriginal syllabics is credited to missionary James Evans around 1840.[7]

The Great Lakes Algonquian syllabary is based upon the French alphabet, with letters organized into syllables. It was primarily used by speakers of Fox, Potawatomi, and Winnebago, but there is indirect evidence of use by speakers of Southwestern Ojibwe ("Chippewa").


Ojibwe "hieroglyphs"

Example of a Birch bark scroll piece

Not much is known regarding the Ojibwe "Hieroglyphs". Similar to the Míkmaq hieroglyphic writing, they are found as petroglyphs, on story-hides, and on Midewiwin Teaching Scrolls. In treaty negotiations with the British, the treaty-signing chiefs would often mark an "X" for their signature and then use the Ojibwe "Hieroglyphic" character representing their Doodem. Today, Ojibwe artists commonly incorporate motifs found in the Ojibwe "Hieroglyphs" to instill "Native Pride."

There are said to be several Ojibwe elders who still know the meanings of many of the hieroglyphs, but as their content is considered sacred, very little information about them has been revealed.

Romanized Ojibwe systems

Modern Roman orthographies

The different systems used to write Ojibwe are typically distinguished by their representation of key features of the Ojibwe inventory of sounds. Differences include: the representation of vowel length, the representation of nasal vowels, the representation of fortis and lenis consonants; and the representation of consonants which require an International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) symbol that differs significantly from the conventional alphabetic symbol.

Double vowel system

The Double Vowel orthography is an adaptation of the linguistically oriented system found in publications such as Leonard Bloomfield’s Eastern Ojibwa.[8] Its name arises from the use of doubled vowel symbols to represent long vowels that are paired with corresponding short vowels;[9] a variant in which long vowels are represented with a macron (ˉ) over short vowels is also reported for several publications in the early 1970s.[10] Development of the Double Vowel orthography is attributed to Charles Fiero.[11] At a conference held to discuss the development of a common Ojibwe orthography, Ojibwe language educators agreed that the Double Vowel system was a preferred choice, while recognizing that other systems were also used and preferred in some locations.[12] The Double Vowel system is widely favored among language teachers in the United States and Canada, and is taught in a program for Ojibwe language teachers.[9][13]

The Double Vowel orthography is used to write several dialects of Ojibwe spoken in the circum-Great Lakes area. Significant publications in the Southwestern Ojibwe dialect (also called "Chippewa") include a widely used dictionary[14] and a collection of texts.[15] The same system with minor differences is used for several publications in the Ottawa and Eastern Ojibwe dialects (see below Ottawa-Eastern Ojibwe double vowel system).

One of the goals underlying the Double Vowel orthography is promoting standardization of Ojibwe writing so that language learners are able to read and write in a consistent way. By comparison, folk phonetic spelling approaches to writing Ottawa based on less systematic adaptations of written English or French are more variable and idiosyncratic, and do not always make consistent use of alphabetic letters.[11]

Letters of the English alphabet substitute for specialized phonetic symbols, in conjunction with orthographic conventions unique to Ojibwe. The system embodies two principles: (1) alphabetic letters from the English alphabet are used to write Ojibwe, but with Ojibwe sound values; (2) the system is phonemic in nature, in that each letter or letter combination indicates its basic sound value, and does not reflect all the phonetic detail that occurs. Accurate pronunciation cannot be learned without consulting a fluent speaker.[16]

The long vowels /iː, oː, aː/ are paired with the short vowels /i, o, a/, and are written with double symbols ii, oo, aa that correspond to the single symbols used for the short vowels i, o, a. The long vowel /eː/ does not have a corresponding short vowel, and is written with a single e.[17]

The short vowels are:[18] i, o, a.

Short vowels (Southwestern Ojibwe dialect)
Sound Phonetic Ojibwe examples Gloss English equivalent
i [ɪ] inini
o [o] ~ [ʊ] ozid
'someone's foot'
'dies, is dead'
obey, book
a [ə] ~ [ʌ] agim
'count someone!'
'sits down'

The long vowels are:[18] ii, oo, aa, e.

Long vowels (Southwestern Ojibwe dialect)
Sound Phonetic Ojibwe examples Gloss English equivalent
ii [iː] niin
'I, me'
oo [oː] ~ [uː] oodena
'runs by'
boat, boot
aa [aː] aagim
'goes away'
e [eː] ~ [ɛː] emikwaan
'person, Indian, Ojibwe'

The short vowel represented as orthographic a has values centring on [ə ~ ʌ]; short i has values centring on [ɪ]; and short o has values centring on [o ~ ʊ]. The long vowel aa has values centring on [aː]; long ii has values centring on [iː]; and long oo has values centring on [oː ~ uː]. The long vowel e has values centring on [eː ~ ɛː].

The long nasal vowels are phonetically [ĩː], [ẽː], [ãː], and [õː]. They most commonly occur in the final syllable of nouns with diminutive suffixes or words with a diminutive connotation.[19] Orthographically they are represented differently in word-final position as opposed to word-internally. In the final syllable of a word the long vowel is followed by word-final nh to indicate that it is nasal; the use of h is an orthographic convention and does not correspond to an independent sound. The examples in the table below are from the Ottawa dialect.[20]

Long nasal vowels in word-final position[20]
Nasal Vowel Example English
iinh kiwenziinh "old man"
wesiinh "(small) animal"
enh mdimooyenh "old woman"
nzhishenh "my uncle"
aanh bnaajaanh "nestling"
oonh zhashkoonh "muskrat"
boodoonh "polliwog, tadpole"

Word-internally long nasal vowels are represented by orthographic ny, as in Southwestern Ojibwe mindimooyenyag 'old women'.[21]

The nasalized allophones of the vowels, which occur predictably preceding the nasal+fricative clusters ns, nz, and nzh are not indicated in writing, in words such as "gaawiin ingikendanziin" 'I don't know it,' "jiimaanens" 'small boat', and "oshkanzhiin" 'someone's fingernail(s)'.[22] Long vowels after the nasal consonants m or n are frequently nasalized, particularly when followed by s, sh, z, or zh. In such cases the nasalization is sometimes overtly indicated by optionally writing n immediately after the vowel: "moonz" or "mooz" 'moose."[22]

In the original Double Vowel system, nasal long vowels now represented with -ny-/-nh were written with the ogonek diacritic in some publications,[23] while in others they are represented by underlining the vowel.[22][24] The Double Vowel system used today employing -ny-/-nh for long nasal vowels is sometimes called "Fiero-Nichols Double Vowel system" since John Nichols popularized this convention.[citation needed]

The affricates // and /dʒ/ are written ⟨ch⟩ and ⟨j⟩, and the fricatives /ʃ/ and /ʒ/ are written ⟨sh⟩ and ⟨zh⟩. The semivowels /j/ and /w/ are written ⟨y⟩ and ⟨w⟩.

The lenis obstruents are written using voiced characters:[25] b, d, g, j, z, zh

Lenis consonants (Southwestern Ojibwe dialect)
Sound Phonetic Ojibwe examples Gloss English equivalent
b [b] ~ [p] bakade
'is hungry'
'in the morning'
pit, spit
d [d] ~ [t] debwe
'tells the truth'
'bring it'
do, stop
g [ɡ] ~ [k] giin
geese, ski
j [dʒ] ~ [tʃ] jiimaan
'boat, canoe'
'a little while'
'I'm cold'
z [z] ~ [s] ziibi
'someone's foot'
'I am sick'
zh [ʒ] ~ [ʃ] zhabonigan
'bring someone!'

The fortis consonants use voiceless characters:[25] p, t, k, ch, s, sh.

Fortis consonants (Southwestern Ojibwe dialect)
Sound Phonetic Ojibwe examples Gloss English equivalent
p [pː] opin
'I laugh'
t [tː] ate
'(something) is there'
'fish spear'
k [kː] makizin
'moccasin shoe'
ch [tʃː] michaa
'is big'
'thank you'
s [sː] asin
'stone, rock'
sh [ʃː] ashigan

The remaining consonants are written m, n, w, y, h, in addition to the glottal stop /ʔ/, which is written <'>.

Other consonants (Southwestern Ojibwe dialect)
Sound Phonetic Ojibwe examples Gloss English equivalent
m [m] miinan
'boat, canoe'
n [n]
[ŋ] before g, k
'a little bit'
w [w] waabang
'goes home'
'listen to someone!'
y [j] wiiyaw
'someone's body'
'my dog'
h [h] hay'
' [ʔ] bakite'an
'hit it!'
'someone's heart'

Although the Double Vowel system treats the digraphs ch, sh, zh each as single sounds, they are alphabetized as two distinct letters. The long vowel written with double symbols are treated as units, and alphabetized after the corresponding short vowel. The resulting alphabetical order is:[26]

a aa b d e g ' h i ii j k m n o oo p s t w y z

The consonant clusters that occur in many Ojibwe dialects are represented with the following sequences of characters:

mb, nd, ng, nj, nz, ns, nzh, sk, shp, sht, shk

Ottawa-Eastern Ojibwe double vowel system

A minor variant of the Double vowel system is used to write the Ottawa and Eastern Ojibwe dialects spoken in Michigan and Southwestern Ontario, as exemplified in a prominent dictionary.[27] Other publications making use of the same system include a reference grammar[28] and a collection of texts dictated by an Ottawa speaker from Walpole Island, Ontario.[29]

These two dialects are characterized by loss of short vowels due to vowel syncope. Since vowel syncope occurs frequently in the Odawa and Eastern Ojibwe dialects, additional consonant clusters arise.

The letter h is used for the glottal stop [ʔ], which is represented in the broader Ojibwe version with the apostrophe. In Ottawa the apostrophe is reserved for a separate function noted below.[14] In a few primarily expressive words, orthographic h has the phonetic value [h]: aa haaw "OK".[30]

The apostrophe   is used to distinguish primary (underlying) consonant clusters from secondary clusters that arise when the rule of syncope deletes a vowel between two consonants. For example, orthographic ng must be distinguished from n’g. The former has the phonetic value [ŋ] (arising from place of articulation assimilation of /n/ to the following velar consonant /ɡ/, which is then deleted in word-final position as in mnising [mnɪsɪŋ] "at the island"), while the latter has the phonetic value [ŋɡ] as in san’goo [saŋɡoː] "black squirrel".[31]

Labialized stop consonants [ɡʷ] and [kʷ], consisting of a consonant with noticeable lip rounding, occur in the speech of some speakers. Labialization is not normally indicated in writing, but a subscript dot is utilized in a dictionary of Ottawa and Eastern Ojibwe to mark labialization: g̣taaji "he is afraid" and aaḳzi "he is sick".[32]

The Ottawa-Eastern Ojibwe variant of the Double vowel system treats the digraphs sh, zh, ch as two separate letters for purposes of alphabetization. Consequently the alphabetical order is:

a b c d e g (g̣) h (ḥ) i j k (ḳ) m n o p s t w y z

Saulteaux-Cree Roman system

The Saulteaux-Cree Roman system is based on the Canadian Aboriginal syllabics. This system is found in northern Ontario, southern Manitoba and southern Saskatchewan. Compared to the Fiero or Rhodes Double Vowel systems, long vowels, including <e>, are shown with either macron or circumflex diacritic marks, depending on the community's standards. Though syncope is not a common feature with Saulteaux, the occasional vowel loss is indicated with a <'>. Nasaled vowels are generally not marked. The resulting alphabetical order is:

' a â c ê h i î k m n o ô p s š t w y

Northern Ojibwe system

Although speakers of the dialects of Ojibwe spoken in northern Ontario most commonly write using the syllabary, an alphabetic system is also employed. This system is similar to the Saulteaux-Cree Roman system, the most notable difference being the substitution of conventional letters of the alphabet for symbols taken from the International Phonetic Alphabet. This results in the use of <sh> instead of <š> and the use of double vowels to represent long vowels.

This system is used in several pedagogical grammars for the Severn Ojibwe dialect,[33][34] a translation of the New Testament in both the Severn Ojibwe and the Berens River dialects,[35] and a text collection in the Northwestern Ojibwe dialect.[36]

The short vowels are:[37] i, o, a

Short vowels
Sound Phonetic Ojibwe examples Gloss English equivalent
i [ɪ] ihkwe
'Canada goose'
o [o] ~ [ʊ] onapi
'sits up'
'together with'
a [ɑ] ~ [ʌ] ahki
'land, moss'
'and, also'
'and, so'

The long vowels are:[38] ii, oo, aa, e

Long vowels
Sound Phonetic Ojibwe examples Gloss English equivalent
ii [iː] iitok
'I, me'
'so, it is'
oo [oː] ~ [uː] oocii
'runs by'
time, dime
aa [aː] aapihta
e [eː] eshkan
'horn, antler'
'hold on!'
'is inside'

The consonants are:[39]

p, c, h, k, m, n, s, sh, t, y, w

The symbol c is used to represent the postalveolar affricate /tʃ/; the digraph sh is used to represent the postalveolar fricative /ʃ/.

The lenis consonants are:[40]

p, c, k, s, sh, t

Consonant examples[39]
Sound Phonetic Ojibwe examples Gloss English equivalent
p [p] ~ [b] pine
pit, spit
t [t] ~ [d] tepwe
time, dime
c [tʃ] ~ [dʒ] ciimaan
chip, judge
k [k] ~ [ɡ] kiin
keep, game
s [s] ~ [z] saakahikan
'I am afraid'
sit, zip
sh [ʃ] ~ [ʒ] shemaak
'right away'
ship, measure
m [m] miskwi
'goes out'
n [n] naabe
w [w] waahsa
y [j] keyaapic
h [h] ohowe 'this' him

Consonant clusters of h followed by a lenis consonant correspond to fortis consonants in other dialects:[40]

hp, hc, hk, hs, hsh, ht

The consonant clusters that occur in Ojibwe dialects that use the Northern orthography are represented with the following sequences of characters:[41]

mp, nt, nc, nk, nz, ns, nsh, sk, shp, sht, shk

Algonquin Roman system

Unlike the other Roman systems modeled after English, the Algonquin Roman system is instead modeled after French. Its most striking features are the use of either circumflex or grave diacritic mark over the long vowels, /tʃ/ and /dʒ/ written as <tc> and <dj>, and /ʃ/ and /ʒ/ are written as <c> and <j>. However, in the Maniwaki dialect of Algonquin, /tʃ/ is written as <ch> and /ʃ/ is written as <sh>.

Correspondence chart of the popular Roman systems

The n-dash (–) is used to mark where no equivalent is found.

Double Vowel
Ottawa-Eastern Ojibwe
Double Vowel
Northern Ojibwe
IPA Value
' ' '
a a a a a ə
aa aa aa ā / â â / à
b b p p b b
ch ch hc hc tc
d d t t d d
e e e ē / ê ê / è
g g k k g ɡ
gw gw / g̣ kw kw gw ɡw
h h h h h h
' h h h h ʔ
i i i i i ɪ
ii ii ii ī / î î / ì
j j c c dj
k k hk hk k k
kw kw / hkw hkw kw kw
m m m m m m
mb mb mp mp mb mb
n n n n n n
nd nd nt nt nd nd
ng ng nk nk ng ŋ(ɡ)
n' nh
nj nj nc nc ndj ndʒ
ns ns nhs nhs ns ṽs
nz nz ns ns nz ṽz
ny / -nh ny / -nh y / –
ṽj /
nzh nzh nsh nj ṽʒ
o o o o o o / ʊ
oo oo oo ō / ô ô / ò /
p p hp hp p p
s s hs hs s s
sh sh hsh c ʃ
shk shk shk šk ck ʃk
shp shp shp šp cp ʃp
sht sht sht št ct ʃt
sk sk sk sk sk sk
t t ht ht t t
w w w w w w
y y y y y j
z z s s z z
zh zh sh š j ʒ

Folk Spelling

Folk spelling of Anishinaabemowin is not a system per se, as it varies from person to person writing speech into script. Each writer employing folk spelling would write out the word as how the speaker himself would form the words. Depending on if the reference sound representation is based on English or French, a word may be represented using common reference language sound representation, thus better able to reflect the vowel or consonant value. However, since this requires the knowledge of how the speaker himself speaks, folk spelling quickly becomes difficult to read for those individuals not familiar with the writer.

Folk spellings continue to be widely used, and in some cases are preferred to more systematic or analytical orthographies. Prominent Ottawa author Basil Johnston has explicitly rejected it, preferring to use a form of folk spelling in which the correspondences between sounds and letters are less systematic.[42][43] Similarly, a lexicon representing Ottawa as spoken in Michigan and another based on Ottawa in Oklahoma use English-based folk spelling distinct from that employed by Johnson.[44][45]

Historical Roman orthographies

Evans system

James Evans, a missionary from Kingston upon Hull, UK, had prepared the Speller and Interpreter in English and Indian [1] in 1837, but was unable to get its printing sanctioned by the British and Foreign Bible Society. Evans continued to use his Ojibwe writing system in his work in Ontario. However, his students appear to have had conceptual difficulties working with the same alphabet for two different languages with very different sounds. Furthermore, the structure of the Ojibwe language made most words quite long when spelled with Roman letters, and Evans himself found this approach awkward. His book also noted differences in the Ojibwe dialectual field. The "default" dialect was the Ojibwemowin spoken at Rice Lake, Ontario (marked as "RL"). The other two were Credit, Ontario, (marked as "C") and areas to the west (marked as "W").

Evans' Ojibwe writing system recognized short and long vowels, but did not distinguish between lenis and fortis consonants. Another distinct character of Evans system was the use of <e> and <o> to serve both as a consonant and vowel. As vowels, they served as /i/ and /o/ while as consonants, they served as /j/ and /ɰ/. The system distinguished long vowels from short vowels by doubling the short vowel value. Evans also used three diacritics to aid the reader in pronunciation. He used a macron (¯) over a vowel or vowels to represent nasals (/Ṽ/) and diaersis (¨) over the vowel to indicate a glottal stop (/ʔ/); if the glottal stop was final, he duplicated the vowel and would place a circumflex (ˆ) over the duplicated vowel. "Gladness," for example, was written as buubenandumooen (baapinendamowin in the Fiero system).

Evans eventually abandoned his Ojibwe writing system and formulated what would eventually become the Canadian Aboriginal syllabics. His Ojibwe syllabics parsing order was based on his Romanized Ojibwe.

Evans system a aa b d e ee g j m n o oo u uu z s
Fiero system i/e e b/p d/t y/i ii g/k j/ch m n w/o oo a aa z/s zh/sh
Evans system V̄V̄ VV̂
Fiero system Vn VVny/VVnh 'V/hV V'

Baraga system

Bishop Frederic Baraga, in his years as a missionary to the Ojibwa and the Odawa, became the foremost[peacock term] grammarian of Anishinaabemowin.

His work A Dictionary of the Otchipwe Language, explained in English is still considered the best reference regarding the Ojibwe vocabulary. In his dictionary, grammar books and prayer book, the sound representations of Ojibwe are shown in the table below. There has also been discussion regarding if Baraga represented nasal. In his earlier editions of the dictionary, circumflex accents were used to indicate nasals but in his later editions, they appear to instead either represent long vowels or stressed vowels, believed to be changed by the editor of his dictionary.

Baraga system a â b d dj e/é/ê g h i j k m n o ô p s sh ss t tch w
Fiero system ' a a/aa b d j e g '/h i/ii/y zh k/g- m n o/oo oo p/b- z sh s t/d- ch w

Cuoq system

Jean-André Cuoq was a missionary to the Algonquin and the Iroquois. He wrote several grammar books, hymnals, a catechism and his premier work Lexique de la Langue Algonquine in 1886, focusing on the form of Anishinaabemowin spoken among the Algonquin. His published works regarding the Algonquin language used basic sounds, without differentiating the consonant strengths or vowel lengths. However, unlike Baraga, Cuoq further broke words down to their root forms and clarified ambiguously defined words found in Baraga's dictionary.

Cuoq system a b c d dj e g h i j k m n o p s t tc Vv w z
Fiero system ' a/aa b sh/zh d j e g '/h i/ii/y zh k/g m n o/oo p/b s/z t/d ch/j V/V:/Vw w z

In later works using the Cuoq system, such as Dictionnaire Français-Algonquin by George Lemoine, long vowels were indicated by a circumflex (ˆ) placed over the vowel, while the unstressed short vowels were indicated by a diaersis (¨) placed over the vowel. As a relic to an older system upon which the Cuoq system is based, <w> of the Cuoq system can also be found as <ȣ> (or the substitute <8>).


Ojibwe syllabics

See Canadian Aboriginal syllabics for a more in-depth discussion of Ojibwe syllabics and related scripts

Ojibwe is also written in a non-alphabetic orthography often called syllabics. Wesleyan clergyman James Evans devised the syllabary in 1840-1841 while serving as a missionary among speakers of Swampy Cree in Norway House in Rupert's Land (now northern Manitoba). Influences on Evans' creation of the syllabary included his prior experience with devising an alphabetic orthography for Eastern Ojibwe, his awareness of the syllabary devised for Cherokee, familiarity with Pitman shorthand,[46] and Devanagari scripts.[47]

The syllabary spread rapidly among speakers of Cree and Ojibwe, and is now widely used by literate Ojibwe speakers in northern Ontario and Manitoba, with most other Ojibwe groups using alphabetically based orthographies, discussed above.[7][46]

The syllabary is conventionally presented in a chart, although different renditions may present varying amounts of detail.[48]

Ojibwe syllabics, shown with Eastern A-Final and pre-glyph W. (Adapted from the charts of Rand Valentine and Language Geek)

The syllabary consists of: (a) characters that represent a syllable consisting of a vowel without any preceding consonantal onset, written with a triangle rotated through four positions to represent the vowel qualities /e, i, o, a/; (b) characters that represent consonant-vowel syllables for the consonants /p t k tʃ m n s ʃ j/ combined with the four vowel qualities; (c) characters called finals that represent syllable-closing consonants both word-finally and word-internally; and (d) modifier characters for /h/ and /w/.[49]

The characters representing combinations of consonant plus vowel are rotated through four orientations, each representing one of the four primary vowels, /e i o a/. The syllabic characters are conventionally presented in a chart (see above) with characters organized into rows representing the value of the syllable onset and the columns representing vowel quality.

A glottal stop or /h/ preceding a vowel is optionally written with a separate character ", as in ᐱᒪᑕᐦᐁ pimaatahe 'is skating'.[50]

The syllable-closing characters referred to as finals (called "terminations" by Evans, with "final" being a later terminological innovation),[51] occur in both word-final, and, less frequently, word-internal positions. The finals are generally superscripted, but originally were printed or handwritten mid-line.[52] There are two distinct sets of finals in use, a Western set and an Eastern set. The Western finals are accent-like in appearance, and are unrelated to the other characters. The Eastern finals occur in two different forms. The more common form, the a-position finals, uses smaller versions of the characters for syllables containing the vowel /a/; the less common i-position set uses smaller versions of the characters for syllables containing the vowel /i/. Use of the i-position series is common in some communities particularly in handwriting.[52][53] The Western finals were introduced in the earliest version of the syllabary and the Eastern finals were introduced in the 1860s.[54]

The examples in the table are cited from Neskantaga, Ontario (Lansdowne House), a community assigned to the Northwestern Ojibwe dialect.[55]

Western and Eastern a-position finals
Sound Western Eastern Roman equivalent English gloss









'tree, stick'
c /tʃ/






'my son'
sh /ʃ/



'bring him!'






y ˙



'now, then'




The sound /w/ is represented by adding a modifier character (), sometimes called 'w-dot', to a triangle or consonant-vowel character. Several different patterns of use occur related to the use of western or eastern finals: (a) Western, w-dot added after the character it modifies, with western finals; (b) Eastern, w-dot added before the character it modifies, with eastern finals; (c) Mixed, w-dot added before the character it modifies, with western finals.[56]

Position of w-dot
Western Eastern Mixed Roman equivalent English gloss
ᐃᐧᓯᓂᐣ ᐧᐃᓯᓂᓐ ᐧᐃᓯᓂᐣ wiihsinin 'eat!'

Vowel length is phonologically contrastive in Ojibwe, but is frequently not indicated by syllabics writers;[57] for example the words aakim 'snowshoe' and akim 'count him, them!' may both be written ᐊᑭᑦ.[58] Vowel length is optionally indicated by placing a dot above the character, with the exception of /eː/, for which there is no corresponding short vowel and hence no need to indicate length.[59] The practice of indicating vowel length is called 'pointed syllabics' or 'pointing'. In the pointed variant, the word 'snowshoe' would be written ᐋᑭᑦ.

The fortis consonants are generally not distinguished in the common unpointed writing from the lenis ones, and thus both /d/ (<t>) and /t/ (<ht>) are written <t>, etc. However, some speakers will place the <h> initial before another initial to indicate that that initial is fortis rather than lenis.

The <h> initial and final are also used to represent the glottal stop in most communities, but in some, a superscripted <i> is used as a glottal stop character.

Not shown in the sample table are the characters representing non-Ojibwe sounds <f th l r>. All syllabics-using Ojibwe communities use <p> with an internal ring to represent <f>, typically ᕓ, ᕕ, ᕗ, ᕙ and ᕝ, and use <t> with an internal ring to represent <th>, typically ᕞ, ᕠ, ᕤ, ᕦ and ᕪ, but variations do exist on the placement of the internal ring. However, method of representing <l> and <r> varies much greatly across the communities using Ojibwe syllabics.

The syllabics-using communities can be classified into:

  • Finals use
    • Eastern A-Finals—consonant in a-direction shown as a superscript; most common finals in use
    • Eastern I-Finals—consonant in i-direction shown as a superscript; used in some communities of Ontario and Quebec
    • Eastern Mixed Finals—consonant in i-, o- or a-direction shown as a superscript with choice dependent upon the word's root; typically found in James Bay Cree influenced communities
    • Western Finals—typically found in Saulteaux (ᑊ <p>, ᐟ <t>, ᐠ <k>, ᐨ <ch>, ᒼ <m>, ᐣ <n>, ᐢ <s>, ᐡ <sh> and ᕀ <y>)
  • W-dot positioning
    • pre-glyph—most commonly associated with Eastern communities (ᐌ)
    • post-glyph—most commonly associated with Western communities (ᐍ)
  • L/R representation
    • independent Sigma form—shaped like Greek capital letter sigma (ᓬ for <l> and ᕒ for <r>).
    • nesting Sigma form—similar to above, but nesting on the N-shape with superscripted sigma-form alone as finals
    • N-shape modified form—most common form, created by an erasure of part of the N-form (ᓓ ᓕ ᓗ ᓚ ᓪ for <l> and ᕃ ᕆ ᕈ ᕋ ᕐ for <r>)
    • Roman Catholic form—most often found in western communities (ᕃ ᕆ ᕊ ᕍ ᔆ for <l> and ᖊ ᖋ ᖌ ᖍ ᙆ for <r>)

Not part of the Unicode standard, thus not shown in the sample table above, is an obsolete set of syllabics form representing šp-series, or the sp-series in those communities where <š> have merged with <s>. Originally this series looked like "Z" or "N" and had the same orientation scheme as ᔐ <še>, ᔑ, <ši> ᔓ <šo> and ᔕ <ša>. This obsolete set has been replaced with either ᔥᐯ/ᐡᐯ <špe>, ᔥᐱ/ᐡᐱ <špi>, ᔥᐳ/ᐡᐳ <špo> and ᔥᐸ/ᐡᐸ <špa> or by ᐢᐯ <spe>, ᐢᐱ <spi>, ᐢᐳ <spo> and ᐢᐸ <spa>.

Also, not shown are the alternate <y>, written as a superscripted w-dot or w-ring, depending on if a medial or a final respectively, in words where <w> have transformed into <y>. In Evans' design, the y-dot was part of the original syllabics set, but due to ease of confusion between it and the w-dot in handwritten documents, most community abandoned the y-dot in favour of the y-cross (ᕀ), which is still being used among communities using Western Finals.

Great Lakes Algonquian syllabary

The Great Lakes Algonquian syllabary is a syllabic writing system based upon the French alphabet, with letters organized into syllables. It was primarily used by speakers of Fox, Potawatomi, and Winnebago, but there is indirect evidence of use by speakers of Southwestern Ojibwe ("Chippewa").[60][61]

It has been suggested that Ottawa speakers were among the groups that used the syllabary,[62] but supporting evidence is weak.[63]

See also


  1. ^ Valentine, J. Randolph, 1994, p. 6
  2. ^ a b Nichols, John, 1980, pp. 1-2
  3. ^ Rhodes, Richard, and Evelyn Todd, 1981
  4. ^ Pentland, David, 1996, p. 262
  5. ^ Ningewance, Patricia, 1999
  6. ^ Walker, Willard, 1996
  7. ^ a b Nichols, John, 1996
  8. ^ Bloomfield, Leonard, 1958
  9. ^ a b Ningewance, Patricia, p. 2
  10. ^ Rhodes, Richard and Evelyn Todd, 1981, p. 65, Table 6, n. a
  11. ^ a b Nichols, John and Lena White, 1987, p. iii
  12. ^ Ningewance, Patricia
  13. ^ Native Language Instructors' Program. Native Language Instructors' Program, Lakehead University Faculty of Education, Lakehead University. Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved on March 27, 2009.
  14. ^ a b Nichols, John and Earl Nyholm, 1995
  15. ^ Kegg, Maude, 1991
  16. ^ Nichols, John and Earl Nyholm, 1995, p. xxiii
  17. ^ Valentine, J. Randolph, 2001, p. 34
  18. ^ a b Nichols, John and Earl Nyholm, 1995, pp. xxiv-xxv
  19. ^ Valentine, J. Randolph, 2001, pp. 185–188
  20. ^ a b Valentine, J. Randolph, 2001, p. 40
  21. ^ Nichols, John and Earl Nyholm, 1995, p. 85
  22. ^ a b c Nichols, John and Earl Nyholm, 1995, p. xxv
  23. ^ Kegg, Maude, 1978, p. vii
  24. ^ Nichols, John and Earl Nyholm, 1979, p. 251
  25. ^ a b Nichols, John and Earl Nyholm, 1995, pp. xxvi-xxvii
  26. ^ Nichols, John and Earl Nyholm, 1995, p. xxiv
  27. ^ Rhodes, Richard, 1985
  28. ^ Valentine, J. Randolph, 2001
  29. ^ Valentine, J. Randolph, 1998
  30. ^ Rhodes, Richard, 1985, xlvi
  31. ^ Rhodes, Richard, 1985, p. xlix
  32. ^ Rhodes, Richard, 1985, pp. xvlvi, xlvii
  33. ^ Mitchell, Mary, 1998
  34. ^ Beardy, Tom, 1996
  35. ^ ᐅᔥᑭᒪᓯᓇᐃᑲᓐ ᑲᐊᓂᔑᓇᐯᒧᒪᑲᒃ Oshkimasina’ikan KaaAnihshinaapemoomakahk, 1988
  36. ^ Sugarhead, Cecilia, 1996
  37. ^ O'Meara, John, 1996, p. xviii
  38. ^ O'Meara, John, 1996, p. xvii-xviii
  39. ^ a b O'Meara, John, 1996, pp. xiv-xv
  40. ^ a b O'Meara, John, 1996, p. xv
  41. ^ O'Meara, John, 1996, p. xvi
  42. ^ Johnston, Basil, 2007, pp. vii-viii
  43. ^ Johnston, Basil, 1979
  44. ^ Cappell, Constance, 2006, pp. 157-196, 232
  45. ^ Dawes, Charles, 1982
  46. ^ a b Murdoch, John 1981
  47. ^ Nichols, John, 1996, p. 599
  48. ^ For the earliest chart, published by Evans in 1841, see Nichols, John, 1984, p. 9. For other charts, see Nichols, John, 1996, pp. 601-603; Fiero, Charles, 1985, p. 98
  49. ^ Nichols, John, 1996, pp. 602-603
  50. ^ O'Meara, John, 1996, p. xix
  51. ^ Nichols, John, 1984, p. 6
  52. ^ a b Nichols, John, 1996, p. 604
  53. ^ Fiero, Charles, 1985, p. 96
  54. ^ Nichols, John, 1996, p. 601
  55. ^ O'Meara, John, 1996, pp. xxiv-xxv
  56. ^ Mixed pattern: O'Meara, John, 1996, p. xxv
  57. ^ Fiero, Charles, 1985, pp. 99, 100
  58. ^ O'Meara, John, 1996, p. xxvi
  59. ^ Nichols, John, 1996, p. 605
  60. ^ Walker, Willard, 1996, pp. 168-172
  61. ^ Smith, Huron, 1932, p. 335
  62. ^ Walker, Willard, 1996, pp. 168-169
  63. ^ Goddard, Ives, 1996, pp. 126–127


  • Baraga, Frederic. 1878. A Dictionary of the Otchipwe Language, explained in English. Montréal: Beauchemin & Valois.
  • Beardy, Tom. 1996. Introductory Ojibwe in Severn dialect. Parts one and two. Thunder Bay, Ontario: Native Language Instructors' program, Lakehead University. ISBN 0-88663-018-5
  • Bloomfield, Leonard. 1958. Eastern Ojibwa: Grammatical sketch, texts and word list. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Cappel, Constance, ed. 2006. Odawa Language and Legends: Andrew J. Blackbird and Raymond Kiogima. Philadelphia: Xlibris. ISBN 978-1-59926-920-7
  • Comrie, Bernard. 2005. "Writing systems." Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gile, Bernard Comrie, eds. The world atlas of language structures, 568-570. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-925591-1
  • Cuoq, Jean André. 1866. Études philologiques sur quelques langues sauvages de l'Amérique. Montréal: Dawson.
  • Cuoq, Jean André. 1886. Lexique de la Langue Algonquine. Montréal: J. Chapleau & Fils.
  • Cuoq, Jean André. 1891. Grammaire de la langue algonquine. Société royale du Canada, Mémoires 9(1): 85-114; 10(1): 41-119.
  • Dawes, Charles E. 1982. Dictionary English-Ottawa Ottawa-English. No publisher given.
  • Fiero, Charles. 1985. "Style Manual for Syllabics.” Barbara Burnaby, ed., Promoting Native Writing Systems in Canada, pp. 95-104. Toronto: OISE Press. ISBN 0-7744-0291-1
  • Furtman, Michael. 2000. Magic on the Rocks. Birch Portage Press.
  • Goddard, Ives. 1996. "Writing and reading Mesquakie (Fox)." W. Cowan, ed., Papers of the twenty-seventh Algonquian conference, pp. 117–134. Ottawa: Carleton University. ISSN 0031-5671
  • Johnston, Basil. 1979. Ojibway language lexicon for beginners. Ottawa: Education and Cultural Support Branch, Indian and Northern Affairs.
  • Johnston, Basil. 2007. Anishinaube Thesaurus. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. ISBN 978-0-87013-753-2
  • Kegg, Maude. 1978. Edited and transcribed by John D. Nichols. Gabekanaansing / At the End of the Trail: Memories of Chippewa Childhood in Minnesota with Texts in Ojibwe and English. Occasional Publications in Anthropology: Linguistics Series No. 4. Greeley, Colorado: Museum of Anthropology, University of Northern Colorado.
  • Kegg, Maude. 1991. Edited and transcribed by John D. Nichols. Portage Lake: Memories of an Ojibwe Childhood. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-2415-7
  • Mitchell, Mary. 1988. Eds. J. Randolph Valentine and Lisa Valentine. Introductory Ojibwe (Severn dialect), Part one. Thunder Bay: Native Language Office, Lakehead University.
  • Murdoch, John. 1981. Syllabics: A successful educational innovation. MEd thesis, University of Manitoba
  • Native Language Instructors' Program. Native Language Instructors' Program, Lakehead University Faculty of Education, Lakehead University. Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved on March 27, 2009.
  • Nichols, John. 1980. Ojibwe morphology. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
  • Nichols, John. 1984. "The composition sequence of the first Cree Hymnal." H. Christoph Wolfart, ed., Essays in Algonquian bibliography in honour of V.M. Dechene, 1-21. Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics.
  • Nichols, John. 1996. "The Cree syllabary." Peter Daniels and William Bright, eds. The world’s writing systems, 599-611. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-507993-0
  • Nichols, John and Earl Nyholm. 1979. Ojibwewi-Ikidowinan: An Ojibwe word resource book. Saint Paul, Minnesota: Minnesoat Archaeological Society.
  • Nichols, John D. and Earl Nyholm. 1995. A Concise Dictionary of Minnesota Ojibwe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 0-8166-2427-5
  • Ningewance, Pat. 1999. Naasaab Izhi-Anishinaabebii'igeng Conference Report A Conference to Find a Common Anishinaabemowin Writing System. Toronto: Literacy and Basic Skills Section, Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. ISBN 0-7778-8695-2
  • O'Meara, John. 1996. "Introduction." John O'Meara, ed., ᓂᓄᑕᐣ / Ninoontaan / I can hear it: Ojibwe stories from Lansdowne House written by Cecilia Sugarhead. Edited, translated and with a glossary by John O’Meara, pp. vii-xxxiii Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics. ISBN 0-921064-14-4
  • O’Meara, John. 1996a. "Writing Anihshininiimowin (Severn Ojibwe)." Tom Beardy, Introductory Ojibwe: Parts One and Two in Severn Dialect, pp. v-xiv. Thunder Bay: Native Language Instructors' Program, Lakehead University. ISBN 0-88663-018-5. Also in Intermediate Ojibwe: Parts One and Two in Severn Dialect; and Advanced Ojibwe: Parts One and Two in Severn Dialect, pp. v-xiv. Thunder Bay: Native Language Instructors' Program, Lakehead University.
  • ᐅᔥᑭᒪᓯᓇᐃᑲᓐ ᑲᐊᓂᔑᓇᐯᒧᒪᑲᒃ Oshkimasina’ikan KaaAnihshinaapemoomakahk. 1988. Toronto: Canadian Bible Society. [New Testament in Roman orthography and Cree syllabics. Chapters in Sandy Lake Ojibwe: Luke, Acts, Philemon; other chapters in Pikangikam Ojibwe] ISBN 0-88834-301-1
  • Pentland, David. 1996. "An Ottawa letter to the Algonquin chiefs at Oka." Brown, Jennifer and Elizabeth Vibert, eds., Reading beyond words: Contexts for Native history, pp. 261–279. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press. ISBN 1-55111-070-9
  • Rhodes, Richard A. 1985. Eastern Ojibwa-Chippewa-Ottawa Dictionary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Rhodes, Richard and Evelyn Todd. 1981. "Subarctic Algonquian languages." June Helm, ed., The Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 6. Subarctic, pp. 52–66. Washington, D.C.: The Smithsonian Institution. ISBN 0-16-004578-9
  • Smith, Huron H. 1932. "Ethnobotany of the Ojibwe Indians." Bulletin of the Public Museum of Milwaukee 4:327-525.
  • Sugarhead, Cecilia. 1996. ᓂᓄᑕᐣ / Ninoontaan / I can hear it: Ojibwe stories from Lansdowne House written by Cecilia Sugarhead. Edited, translated and with a glossary by John O’Meara. Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics. ISBN 0-921064-14-4
  • Valentine, J. Randolph. 1994. Ojibwe dialect relationships. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
  • Valentine, J. Randolph. 1998. Weshki-bimaadzijig ji-noondmowaad. 'That the young might hear': The stories of Andrew Medler as recorded by Leonard Bloomfield. London, ON: The Centre for Teaching and Research of Canadian Native Languages, University of Western Ontario. ISBN 0-7714-2091-9
  • Valentine, J. Randolph. 2001. Nishnaabemwin Reference Grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 0-8020-4870-6
  • Walker, Willard. 1996. "Native writing systems." Ives Goddard, ed., The Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 17. Languages, 158-184. Washington, D.C.: The Smithsonian Institution. ISBN 0-16-048774-9

Further reading

External links

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Ojibwe language — Anishinaabemowin, ᐊᓂᔑᓈᐯᒧᐎᓐ Pronunciation [anɪʃɪnaːpeːmowɪn] Spoken in …   Wikipedia

  • List of writing systems — This is a list of writing systems (or scripts), classified according to some common distinguishing features.The usual name of the script is given first (and bolded); the name of the language(s) in which the script is written follows (in brackets) …   Wikipedia

  • List of inventors of writing systems — This is a chronological list of any individuals, legendary or real, who are purported by traditions to have invented alphabets or other writing systems, whether this is proven or not.* Enos Biblical patriarch, ascribed introduction of consonantal …   Wikipedia

  • Ojibwe dialects — The Ojibwe language is spoken in a series of dialects occupying adjacent territories, forming a language complex in which mutual intelligibility between adjacent dialects may be comparatively high but declines between some non adjacent dialects.… …   Wikipedia

  • List of languages by writing system — This article is a list of languages sorted by writing system (by alphabetical order).Arabic alphabet*Arabic *Azeri (Iran) *Balochi *Berber *Fulani (on occasion) *Hausa (on occasion) *Kanuri (on occasion) *Kashmiri *Kazakh in China *Kurdish (Iran… …   Wikipedia

  • Ottawa dialect — Ottawa Nishnaabemwin, Daawaamwin Spoken in Canada, United States Region Ontario, Michigan, Oklahoma Ethnicity Ottawa people …   Wikipedia

  • Ojibwa-Potawatomi-Ottawa language dialects — thumb|right|450px|The subgrouping of Anishinaabemowin dialects based on lexical innovations and mutual intelligibility (rather than morphology or pronunciation), according to Evelyn Todd and Richard Rhodes. EOj = Eastern Ojibwe; SWOj =… …   Wikipedia

  • Ojibwa-Ottawa language — Infobox Language name=Ojibwa Ottawa language nativename=ᐊᓂᔑᓈᐯᒧᐎᓐ Anishinaabemowin pronunciation=/ənɪʃʰɪnaːpeːmowɪn/ or /ənɪʰʃɪnaːpeːmowɪn/ states=Flag|Canada, Flag|United States region=western Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba and into Saskatchewan, with …   Wikipedia

  • Ojibwa-Potawatomi-Ottawa language — Infobox Language name=Ojibwa Potawatomi Ottawa language nativename=ᐊᓂᔑᓈᐯᒧᐎᓐ Anishinaabemowin pronunciation=/ənɪʃʰɪnaːpeːmowɪn/ or /ənɪʰʃɪnaːpeːmowɪn/ states=Flag|Canada, Flag|United States region=western Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba and into… …   Wikipedia

  • Ojibwa language — Infobox Language name=Ojibwa language nativename= Ojibemowin pronunciation=/otʃɪpweːmowɪn/ states=Flag|Canada, Flag|United States region=Ontario, Manitoba and into Saskatchewan, with outlying groups as far west as British Columbia; in the United… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”