Asexuality

Asexuality
Sexual orientation
Orientations
Asexual · Bisexual · Heterosexual · Homosexual
Gender-based alternative concepts
Androphilia and gynephilia · Human female sexuality · Human male sexuality · Intersexuality · Third sex · Two-Spirit
Research
Biology · Demographics · Environment · Kinsey scale · Klein Grid · Neuroscience · Non-heterosexual · Psychology · Queer studies · Sexology · Timeline of sexual orientation and medicine
Non-human animals:
Homosexual behavior in animals (List)
Category:Sexual orientation
Sexuality portal
This box: view · talk · edit

Asexuality (sometimes referred to as nonsexuality),[1][2][3] in its broadest sense, is the lack of sexual attraction[4][5] and, in some cases, the lack of interest in sex. [6] Sometimes, it is considered a lack of a sexual orientation.[7] One commonly cited study placed the prevalence of asexuality at 1%.[8]

Asexuality is distinct from abstention from sexual activity and from celibacy, which are behavioral and generally motivated by an individual's religious (or other) beliefs;[9] sexual orientation, unlike sexual behavior, is believed to be "enduring".[10][11] Some asexuals do engage in sexual activity despite lacking a desire for sex or sexual attraction, due to a variety of reasons, such as a desire to please romantic partners.[12]

Only recently has asexuality become a field of scientific research.[13] However, there is a growing body of research on asexuality from both sociological and psychological perspectives.

Contents

Romantic relationships

Asexuals, while typically lacking in sexual desire for any gender, may engage in purely emotional romantic relationships.[14][15][16] Terms concerning this:

  • aromantic: lack of romantic attraction towards anyone
  • biromantic: romantic attraction towards person(s) of two different genders
  • heteroromantic: romantic attraction towards person(s) of a different gender
  • homoromantic: romantic attraction towards person(s) of the same gender
  • panromantic (also omniromantic): romantic attraction towards person(s) of any gender or lack of gender, including persons of nonbinary gender
  • transromantic: romantic attraction towards person(s) of variant or ambiguous gender
  • polyromantic: romantic attraction towards more than one person at any given time (the term does not express the gender of these persons)
  • demiromantic: romantic attraction after developing an emotional connection beforehand (the term does not express the gender of these persons)

Prevalence

In the mid-twentieth century, Alfred Kinsey rated individuals from 0 to 6 according to their sexual orientation from heterosexual to homosexual, known as the Kinsey scale. He also included a category he called "X" for individuals with "no socio-sexual contacts or reactions". He labeled 1.5% of the adult male population as X.[17][18] In Kinsey's second book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, he reported this breakdown of individuals who are X: unmarried females = 14–19%, married females = 1–3%, previously married females = 5–8%, unmarried males = 3–4%, married males = 0%, and previously married males = 1–2%.[18]

Further empirical data about an asexual demographic appeared in 1994, when a research team in the United Kingdom carried out a comprehensive survey of 18,876 British residents, spurred by the need for sexual information in the wake of the AIDS pandemic. The survey included a question on sexual attraction, to which 1.05% of the respondents replied that they had "never felt sexually attracted to anyone at all."[19] This study of this phenomenon was continued by the Canadian sexuality researcher Dr. Anthony Bogaert in 2004, who explored the asexual demographic in a series of studies. Bogaert believed that the 1% figure was not an accurate reflection of the likely much larger percentage of the population that could be identified as asexual, noting that in the initial survey 30% of people contacted chose not to participate in the survey. Since less sexually experienced people are more likely to refuse to participate in studies about sexuality, and asexuals tend to be less sexually experienced than sexuals, it is likely that asexuals were over-represented in the 30% who did not participate, compared to the 70% who did. The same study found the number of homosexuals and bisexuals combined to be about 1.1% of the population, which is much smaller than other studies indicate.[4][7] However, Bogaert's sexuality research has been scrutinized in the past, since he was involved in studies that linked race to sexual behaviors as if they had an evolutionary basis. This study was highly debated by the scientific community as potentially constituting a case of scientific racism.[20]

Research

The Kinsey Institute sponsored another small survey on the topic in 2007, which found that self-identified asexuals "reported significantly less desire for sex with a partner, lower sexual arousability, and lower sexual excitation but did not differ consistently from non-asexuals in their sexual inhibition scores or their desire to masturbate".[12]

A 1977 paper entitled Asexual and Autoerotic Women: Two Invisible Groups, by Myra T. Johnson, may be the first paper explicitly devoted to asexuality in humans. Johnson defines asexuals as those men and women "who, regardless of physical or emotional condition, actual sexual history, and marital status or ideological orientation, seem to prefer not to engage in sexual activity." She contrasts autoerotic women with asexual women: "The asexual woman [...] has no sexual desires at all [but] the autoerotic woman [...] recognizes such desires but prefers to satisfy them alone." Johnson's evidence is mostly letters to the editor found in women's magazines written by asexual/autoerotic women. She portrays them as invisible, "oppressed by a consensus that they are nonexistent," and left behind by both the sexual revolution and the feminist movement. Society either ignores or denies their existence or insists they must be ascetic for religious reasons, neurotic, or asexual for political reasons.[21]

In a study published in 1979 in Advances in the Study of Affect, vol. 5, and in another article using the same data and published in 1980 in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Michael D. Storms of the University of Kansas outlined his own reimagining of the Kinsey scale. Whereas Kinsey measured sexual orientation based on a combination of actual sexual behavior and fantasizing and eroticism, Storms only used fantasizing and eroticism. Storms, however, placed hetero-eroticism and homo-eroticism on separate axes rather than at two ends of a single scale; this allows for a distinction between bisexuality (exhibiting both hetero- and homo-eroticism in degrees comparable to hetero- or homosexuals, respectively) and asexuality (exhibiting a level of homo-eroticism comparable to a heterosexual and a level of hetero-eroticism comparable to a homosexual, namely, little to none). Storms conjectured that many researchers following Kinsey's model could be mis-categorizing asexual subjects as bisexual, because both were simply defined by a lack of preference for gender in sexual partners.[22][23]

The first study that gave empirical data about asexuals was published in 1983 by Paula Nurius, concerning the relationship between sexual orientation and mental health. Unlike previous studies on the subject, she used the above-mentioned two-dimensional model for sexual orientation. Six hundred eighty-nine subjects—most of whom were students at various universities in the United States taking psychology or sociology classes—were given several surveys, including four clinical well-being scales and a survey asking how frequently they engaged in various sexual activities and how often they would like to engage in those activities. Based on the results, respondents were given a score ranging from 0 to 100 for hetero-eroticism and from 0 to 100 for homo-eroticism. Respondents who scored lower than 10 on both were labeled "asexual." This consisted of 5% of the males and 10% of the females. Results showed that asexuals were more likely to have low self-esteem and more likely to be depressed than members of other sexual orientations; 25.88% of heterosexuals, 26.54% bisexuals (called "ambisexuals"), 29.88% of homosexuals, and 33.57% of asexuals were reported to have problems with self-esteem. A similar trend existed for depression. Nurius did not believe that firm conclusions can be drawn from this for a variety of reasons. Asexuals also reported much lower frequency and desired frequency of a variety of sexual activities including having multiple partners, anal sexual activities, having sexual encounters in a variety of locations, and autoerotic activities.[24]

Though comparisons with non-human sexuality are problematic, a series of studies done on ram mating preferences at the United States Sheep Experiment Station in Dubois, Idaho, starting in 2001 found that about 2–3% of the animals being studied had no apparent interest in mating with either sex; the researchers classified these animals as asexual, but found them to be otherwise healthy with no recorded differences in hormone levels.[25][26]

Asexuality is most comparable to hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), in the sense that both imply a general lack of sexual attraction to anyone. In the present, asexuality is not considered a disorder, because being asexual does not necessarily define someone as having problems relating to others socially. Asexuality also does not imply that lacking sexual attraction causes anxiety. The absence of sexual attraction is a life-enduring characteristic of asexuality.[4]

A more recent paper written by Karli June Cerankowski and Megan Milks, entitled New Orientations: Asexuality and Its Implications for Theory and Practice, suggests that asexuality may be somewhat of a question in itself for these studies of gender and sexuality.[27] Cerankowski and Milks have found that asexuality, by means of feminist and queer studies, raises many more questions than it resolves, such as how a person could abstain from having sex which is generally accepted by society to be the most basic of instincts. The article also states that society has either deemed "[LGBT and] female sexuality as empowered or repressed. The asexual movement challenges that assumption by challenging many of the basic tenants of pro-sex feminism already defined as repressive or anti-sex sexualities." AVEN has formulated asexuality as a biologically determined orientation. This formula, if dissected scientifically and proven, would support researcher Simon LaVey's conclusive blind study of the hypothalamus in gay men, women, and 'straight' men, which found that there is a biological difference between 'straight' men and gay men.[28]

Sexual orientation and etiology

There is great debate over whether asexuality is a sexual orientation or not. Some scholars claim that it is not a meaningful category to add to the continuum of orientations, and say that it is instead the lack of a sexual orientation or sexuality. Others state that it is the denial of one's natural sexuality, and that it is a disorder caused by shame of sexuality or anxiety. However, many other scholars assert that asexuality is a sexual orientation, as there are variations of sexual preferences, and this ought to be included.[29]

Most traits in an average population can be described in terms of a bell curve. While the majority of people represent the average value for a given trait, a smaller number lie on either extreme. When describing the sex drive with such a curve, the majority of the population falls in the middle (as is true for any trait). Conversely, a small proportion will naturally represent either extreme - some, shown on the far right, are "hypersexual," while others, on the far left, are asexual.

Etiology in this context is without implication of disease, disorder, or abnormality.[30][31][32][33] Research on the etiology of sexual orientation when applied to asexuality has the definitional problem that sexual orientation is not consistently defined by all research investigators as including asexuality.[34] Sexual orientation being "enduring" and resistant to change ("[s]exual orientation has proved to be generally impervious to interventions intended to change it")[35] and asexuality being a sexual orientation, asexuality is enduring and resistant to change.

While heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality are usually, but not always, determined during the early years of preadolescent life, it is not known when asexuality is determined. "It is unclear whether these characteristics [viz., "lacking interest in or desire for sex"] are thought to be lifelong, or if they may be acquired."[36]

Nonmeasurement in some areas of sexual orientation is accepted by the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, and the National Association of Social Workers: "[S]imply to document that a phenomenon occurs, case studies and nonprobability samples are often adequate. . . . Some groups are sufficiently few in number – relative to the entire population – that locating them with probability sampling is extremely expensive or practically impossible. In the latter cases, the use of nonprobability samples is often appropriate."[37] In determining etiologies, when asexuals are a small percentage of a large society, asexuals with a given etiology will compose an even smaller percentage, so that etiological information is available only from some individuals, generally not randomly selected.[38][39][40][41][42]

Community

A community of self-identified asexuals coalesced in the early 21st century, aided by the popularity of online communities.[5]

Dr. Elizabeth Abbot, author of A History of Celibacy, acknowledges a difference between asexuality and celibacy and posits that there has always been an asexual element in the population but that asexual people kept a low profile. While failure to consummate marriage was seen as "an insult to the sacrament of marriage" in medieval Europe, asexuality, unlike homosexuality, has never been illegal, and asexual people have been able to "fly under the radar". However, in the 21st century the anonymity of online communication and general popularity of social networking online has facilitated the formation of a community built around a common asexual identity.[43]

The Asexual Visibility and Education Network (AVEN) was founded in 2001 by David Jay with two primary goals: to create public acceptance and discussion of asexuality and to facilitate the growth of an asexual community.[44] Since that time, it has grown to host the world’s largest online asexual community, serving as an informational resource and meeting place for people who are asexual and questioning, their friends and families, academic researchers, and the press. The network has additional satellite communities in ten languages. Members of AVEN have been involved in media coverage spanning television, print, and radio and participate in lectures, conferences, and Pride events around the world.[45]

Asexual communities such as AVEN can be beneficial to those in search of answers to solve a crisis of identity. In many cases of asexuality, an individual goes through a series of emotional processes that end with that person identifying with the asexual community. The individual first realizes their sexual atractions differ from the majority of society. This individual difference leads to questioning whether the way they feel is acceptable, and possible reasons why they feel this way. Pathological beliefs tend to follow where, in some cases, a person may seek medical help because they feel they have a disease. Self-understanding is usually reached when the individual searching for clarity finds a definition that matches their feelings. Asexuality communities provide support and information that allows newly identified asexuals to move from self-clarification to identifying on a communal level, which can be empowering, because they now have something to associate with, which gives normality to this overall socially-isolating situation. [46]

As an emerging identity with a broad definition, there is an enormous amount of variation among people who identify as asexual. Some asexuals may masturbate as a solitary form of release, while others do not feel a need to.[5] The need or desire for masturbation is commonly referred to as a "sex drive" and is disassociated from sexual attraction; asexuals who masturbate generally consider it to be a normal product of the human body and not a sign of latent sexuality. Asexuals also differ in their feelings towards performing sex acts: some are indifferent and may even have sex for the benefit of a partner, while others are more strongly averse to the idea although they don’t necessarily dislike the other people for having sex as long as it doesn’t involve them .[47]

At this time, asexual organizations and other internet resources play a key role in informing people about asexuality. Not enough research has been done on this topic, making it difficult for doctors to understand the causation. Most people who say they are asexual have diagnosed themselves. This can be a problem when asexuality is mistaken for intimacy or relationship issues, or other symptoms that don’t define asexuality. There is also a significant population that either doesn’t understand, or doesn’t believe in asexuality, which adds to the importance of these organizations to inform the general population.[48]

Legal protections

Currently the U.S. states of Vermont[49] and New York[50] have labeled asexuals as a protected class.

Asexuality does not typically attract attention of the public or major scrutiny. Thus it has not been subject of legislation as other sexual orientations have.[7]

Religious views

In some branches of Christianity it has been considered a spiritual discipline to refrain from all sexual activity and desire. The justification for this has been Jesus' statement: "For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let the one who is able to receive this receive it" (Matthew 19:12, KJV). Others have noted Jesus' words: "But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. (Mark 10:6-9, KJV; cf. Matthew 19:1-10). It is pointed out that the context of Jesus' statements concerns divorce in which he confronts the prevalent idea of divorce for any reason. It is maintained that the intent concerned the importance of marital responsibilities rather than spiritual discipline.

In the religion of Islam, asexuality is acknowledged but was not given a specific name. It makes an appearance in the ruling of marriage where it is said, "One should not marry if he does not possess the means to maintain a wife and future family or if he has no sex drive or if he dislikes children, or if he feels marriage will seriously affect his religious obligations. If a person knows for certain that he or she cannot fulfill the duties required in marriage, and there is no fear of his/her falling into sin, then it becomes haram for such a person to get married. Islam forbids its followers from doing injustice to another person; this would definitely be the case if one were to neglect his/her spousal duties." Where spousal duties also mean being available for their partner when they have desire, and if one knows they can never have desire (i.e. asexual) then it would almost be a sin to get married because you would be unable to do justice to your partner's sexual desires, and you would be unable to do justice onto yourself. One can get married though if one finds a partner who they can support and be with without having sex.[51][52][53]

In the religion of Satanism, The Satanic Bible is one of the few texts that acknowledges asexuality by name.[54] Some of the passages from that text include "'In many cases of sexual sublimination (or asexuality), any attempt to emancipate himself sexually would prove devastating to the asexual."(Pg. 69) It is also asserted that, "Asexuals are invariably sexually sublimated by their jobs or hobbies. All the energy and driving interest which would normally be devoted to sexual activity is channeled into other pastimes or into their chosen occupations. If a person favors other interests over sexual activity, it is his right, and no one is justified in condemning him for it." (Pg. 70)

Symbols

The AVEN triangle

Asexuals have no one fixed symbol, and none has ever officially been declared as the primary symbol of the community; however, some have through the years become more prominent and important than others.

One of the symbols most easily associated with the asexual community is the asexual triangle also known as the AVEN triangle due to its origins on the AVEN forum. David Jay, the founder of AVEN, based the asexual triangle on the gay pride pink triangle when he was first starting the forum and before the AVEN community, or any asexual community outside of AVEN had started up proper. The top line of the triangle represents the Kinsey Scale with the third point representing the other dimension of how strongly one is sexually attracted to people. The triangle and the gradient thus depicts the fade between sexual and asexual.[55] However, the triangle is now used more as a metaphor than as an accurate diagram of human sexuality and the asexual community's place in it. It has, at times, been adapted to a gradient filled heart or spade, but the triangle version is by far the more common version.[citation needed]

The asexual pride flag

Other common symbols are the Ace of Spades or the Ace of Hearts playing on words, with 'Ace' also being a shortened word for asexual. There is no fixed choice between which one works better though it has been suggested that the Ace of Hearts works for the romantic asexuals and the Ace of Spades for the aromantic asexuals.[56] This however is not a strict rule by any means nor accepted by all asexuals.

Another common symbol for asexuality is cake, or rather a slice of it. Coming from the idea that 'cake is better than sex' and also as a general feel good welcome, comfort or congratulatory gesture.[57] It has been worn on shirts when AVEN members have marched during Pride along with a mash up of the AVEN triangle and the Ace of Spades.

Some asexuals wear a black ring on the middle finger of their right hand.[58]

In August 2010, after a process of trying to get the word out, even outside AVEN[59] and non-English speaking areas a flag was eventually voted on in a non-AVEN site[60] and then elected.[61] It has since been seen used on tumblr and various LGBTQetc areas in the 'real' world including Prides in multiple countries, and in everyday life as badges and bracelets etc. Even prior to formal election it could be seen alongside other Sexual Orientations flags in some spaces.[62] The black stripe represents asexuality, the grey stripe grey-asexuality (those falling somewhere on the spectrum between sexuality and asexuality, or questioning) and the demisexuals, the white stripe sexuality and the purple stripe community.

Notable asexuals

  • Edward Gorey, writer and illustrator. Gorey never married or had any known romantic relationships and responded to an interviewer's questioning of his sexual orientation with, "I'm neither one thing nor the other particularly ... I am apparently reasonably undersexed or something." He agreed with the interviewer's suggestion that the "sexlessness" of his books was "a product of his asexuality".[63]
  • Keri Hulme, author of The Bone People, winner of the 1985 Booker Prize, discussed asexuality and her involvement with AVEN in a 2007 interview.[64]
  • Bradford Cox, an American musician, leader of the bands Deerhunter and Atlas Sound.[65]
  • Emilie Autumn, an American singer-songwriter, poet, and violinist who is best known for her wide range of musical styles and her usage of theatrics.[66]
  • Tim Gunn, an American fashion consultant and television personality. He is a homoromantic asexual.[67]
  • Janeane Garofalo, an American stand-up comedian, actress, political activist and writer. During her filmed stand-up show in Seattle, she brought up her ten-year asexual relationship with her boyfriend, describing herself as having no interest in sex whatsoever.[68]
  • Mike Skinner, UK garage artist of The Streets [69]
  • J. M. Barrie, author of Peter Pan [70][71]
  • Kenji Miyazawa, Japanese poet and novelist [72]
Fictional characters and persons

See also

References

  1. ^ http://www.thefreedictionary.com/asexual
  2. ^ http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nonsexual
  3. ^ http://dir.salon.com/story/mwt/feature/2005/05/26/asexual/
  4. ^ a b c Bogaert, Anthony F. (2006). "Toward a conceptual understanding of asexuality". Review of General Psychology 10 (3): 241–250. Retrieved on 31 August 2007.
  5. ^ a b c Westphal, Sylvia Pagan (2004). "Feature: Glad to be asexual". New Scientist. http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6533. Retrieved 11 November 2007. 
  6. ^ Dictionary.com, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.): asexual: "Lacking interest in or desire for sex."
  7. ^ a b c Bogaert, Anthony F. (2004). "Asexuality: prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample". Journal of Sex Research 41 (3): 281. Retrieved on 31 August 2007.
  8. ^ "Study: One in 100 adults asexual". CNN.com. 15 October 2004. http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/10/14/asexual.study/index.html. Retrieved 11 November 2007. 
  9. ^ The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (3d ed. 1992), entries for celibacy and thence abstinence.
  10. ^ "What is sexual orientation?". APAHelpCenter.org. http://www.apa.org/topics/sexuality/orientation.aspx. Retrieved 2011-03-31. 
  11. ^ Brief Amici Curiae of the American Psychological Association, California Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, National Association of Social Workers, and National Association of Social Workers California Chapter in Support of the Parties Challenging the Marriage Exclusion, in In re Marriage Cases, Case S147999, Calif. Sup. Ct., Sep. 26, 2007, <http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courts/supreme/highprofile/documents/Amer_Psychological_Assn_Amicus_Curiae_Brief.pdf>, as accessed Mar. 17, 2010, p. 6 (p. 28 per Adobe Acrobat Reader) (not including asexuality as a sexual orientation).
  12. ^ a b Prause, Nicole; Cynthia A. Graham (August 2004). "Asexuality: Classification and Characterization" (PDF). Archives of Sexual Behavior 36 (3): 341–356. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9142-3. PMID 17345167. http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/PDF/PrauseGrahamPDF.pdf. Retrieved 31 August 2007. 
  13. ^ [www.asexuality.org/home/overview.html "Overview"]. www.asexuality.org/home/overview.html. Retrieved 14 October 2011. 
  14. ^ http://www.asexuality.org/home/relationship.html
  15. ^ http://www.gayline.gen.nz/asexual.htm
  16. ^ http://www.yorklgbt.org/LGBT/asexual
  17. ^ Kinsey, Alfred C. (1948). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. W.B. Saunders. ISBN 0-253-33412-8. 
  18. ^ a b Kinsey, Alfred C. (1953). Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. W.B. Saunders. ISBN 0-253-33411-X. 
  19. ^ Wellings, K. (1994). Sexual Behaviour in Britain: The National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles. Penguin Books.
  20. ^ Rushton, Pillipe and Anthony Bogaert. 1989. Population Differences in Susceptibility to AIDS: An Evolutionary Analysis. Social Science and Medicine 28(2):1211-1220.
  21. ^ "Asexual and Autoerotic Women: Two Invisible Groups" found in ed. Gochros, H.L.; J.S. Gochros (1977). The Sexually Oppressed. Associated Press. ISBN 9780809619153
  22. ^ Storms, Michael D. (1980). "Theories of Sexual Orientation". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 (5): 783–792. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.5.783. 
  23. ^ Storms, M. D. (1979). Sexual orientation and self-perception. ed. Pliner, Patricia et al. Advances in the Study of Communication and Affect. Volume 5: Perception of Emotion in Self and Others Plenum Press
  24. ^ Nurius, Paula (1983). "Mental Health Implications of Sexual Orientation". The Journal of Sex Research 19 (2): 119–136. doi:10.1080/00224498309551174. 
  25. ^ Roselli, Charles A.; Stormshak, F; Stellflug, JN; Resko, JA (2002). "Relationship of serum testosterone concentrations to mate preferences in rams". Biology of Reproduction 67 (1): 263–268. doi:10.1095/biolreprod67.1.263. PMID 12080026. http://www.biolreprod.org/cgi/content/full/67/1/263. Retrieved 31 August 2007. 
  26. ^ Stellflug, J.N. (1 June 2006). "Comparison of cortisol, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone responses to a defined stressor in sexually inactive rams and sexually active female-oriented and male-oriented rams". Journal of Animal Science 84 (6): 1520–1525. PMID 16699109. http://jas.fass.org/cgi/content/abstract/84/6/1520. Retrieved 31 August 2007. 
  27. ^ Cerankowski, Karli June; Megan Milks (2010). "New Orientations: Asexuality and Its Implications for Theory and Practice". Feminist Studies 36 (3): 650-654. 
  28. ^ Myers, David G. (2010). Psychology (9th ed. ed.). New York: Worth Publishers. pp. 474. ISBN 978-1-4292-1597-8. 
  29. ^ Melby, Todd (November 2005). "Asexuality gets more attention, but is it a sexual orientation?". Contemporary Sexuality 39 (11): 1,4-5. 
  30. ^ In Webster's Third (Merriam-Webster), etiology is defined both with and without reference to disease. The word is defined as "a science or doctrine of causation or of the demonstration of causes" and as "a branch of science dealing with the causes of particular phenomena", thus without implying disease or abnormality. However, it is also defined as "all the factors that contribute to the occurrence of a disease or abnormal condition". Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged ([prob. Springfield, Mass.:] G. & C. Merriam (Merriam-Webster), 1966), entry etiology.
  31. ^ In the Shorter Oxford Eng. Dict. ([4th] ed.), etiology is defined both with and without reference to disease. The word is defined as "[t]he assignment of a cause", as "the cause assigned", and, as now rare or obsolete, as "[t]he philosophy of causation; the part of a science which treats of the causes of its phenomena." However, it is also defined in medicine as "[t]he causation of disease (usu., of a specified disease), esp. as a subject for investigation." The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary: On Historical Principles (Oxford: Clarendon Press, [4th] ed. 1993 (ISBN 0-19-861271-0)), entry aetiology, via entry etiology.
  32. ^ In the American Heritage Dict. (3d ed.), etiology is defined both with and without reference to disease. The word is defined as "[t]he study of causes or origins" and as "[a]ssignment of a cause, an origin, or a reason for something." However, it is also defined as "[t]he branch of medicine that deals with the causes or origins of disease" and as "[t]he cause or origin of a disease or disorder as determined by medical diagnosis." The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, 3d ed. 1992 (ISBN 0-395-44895-6)), entry etiology.
  33. ^ In a nursing dictionary, etiology is defined relative only to disease. The word is defined as "[t]he study of the causes of disease" and as "[t]he cause of a disease", with no other definitions, in Thomas, Clayton L., ed., Taber's Cyclopedic Medical Dictionary (Philadelphia: F. A. Davis, ed. 16 8th printing 1989 (ISBN 0-8036-8310-3)), entry etiology. The dictionary is intended for "those in the field of nursing" and others. Id., p. viii (Introduction to Edition 16, by Clayton Lay Thomas).
  34. ^ E.g., one study on hormonal influences defines sexual orientation as "heterosexuality, homosexuality, or bisexuality" only. Garcia-Falgueras, Alicia, & Swaab, Dick F., Sexual Hormones and the Brain: An Essential Alliance for Sexual Identity and Sexual Orientation, in Endocrine Development, vol. 17, p. 24 (2010) (ISSN 1421-7082) (authors are of Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, of Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (author contact is 2d author) (vol. 17 is Sandro Loche, Marco Cappa, Lucia Ghizzoni, Mohamad Maghnie, & Martin O. Savage, eds., Pediatric Neuroendocrinology) ("sexual orientation (heterosexuality, homosexuality, or bisexuality)").
  35. ^ Case No. S147999 in the Supreme Court of the State of California, In re Marriage Cases Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365, Application For Leave to File Brief Amici Curiae in Support of the Parties Challenging the Marriage Exclusion, and Brief Amici Curiae of the American Psychological Association, California Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, National Association of Social Workers, and National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter in Support of the Parties Challenging the Marriage Exclusion (California amicus brief of APA, APA, & NASW), as accessed Mar. 17, 2010, Brief, p. 6 & p. 11 n. 14, respectively (pp. 28 & 33, respectively, per Adobe Acrobat Reader).
  36. ^ Prause, Nicole, & Graham, Cynthia A., Asexuality: Classification and Characterization, Mar. 8, 2007 (rec'd Dec. 6, 2005, revised Mar. 20, 2006, & accepted Jul. 8, 2006), in Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 36, no. 3 (Jun., 2007), as accessed Mar. 17, 2010 (DOI 10.1007/s10508-006-9142-3), p. 342 (also springerlink.com (part) & PubMed (part)), both as accessed Mar. 17, 2010) (lead author Nicole Prause of Dep't Psychological & Brain Scis., Indiana Univ., author Cynthia A. Graham of Oxford Doctoral Course in Clinical Psychology, Isis Education Centre, Warneford Hospital, Headington, Oxford, & both authors of Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, & Reproduction, Indiana Univ.).
  37. ^ Case No. S147999 in the Supreme Court of the State of California, In re Marriage Cases Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365, Application For Leave to File Brief Amici Curiae in Support of the Parties Challenging the Marriage Exclusion, and Brief Amici Curiae of the American Psychological Association, California Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, National Association of Social Workers, and National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter in Support of the Parties Challenging the Marriage Exclusion (California amicus brief of APA, APA, & NASW), as accessed Mar. 17, 2010, Brief, p. 4 n. 3 (p. 26, per Adobe Acrobat Reader).
  38. ^ abc55555 (user), "My Reason For Being Asexual", comment #1, Mar. 20, 2005, as accessed Feb. 28, 2010.
  39. ^ fangless (user), "One Reason Why I Don't Like Sex", comment #1, Sep. 26, 2008, and comment #20, Sep. 26, 2008, both as accessed Feb. 28, 2010.
  40. ^ Cheerio_Koroke (user), "One Reason Why I Don't Like Sex", comment #16, Sep. 27, 2008, as accessed Feb. 28, 2010.
  41. ^ Bridgeman, Shelley (5 August 2007). "No sex please, we're asexual". The New Zealand Herald. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=10455823&pnum=0. Retrieved 16 September 2011. 
  42. ^ Levinson, Nick, For Men Only: Asexuality, in So to Speak: a feminist journal of language and art, vol. 14, no. 2 (2005), pp. 51–54.
  43. ^ Duenwald, Mary (9 July 2005). "For Them, Just Saying No Is Easy". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/09/fashion/thursdaystyles/09asexual.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=520063b1b0fd9ad7&ex=1275969600&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss. Retrieved 17 September 2007. 
  44. ^ "About AVEN". Asexual Visibility and Education Network. http://www.asexuality.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=section&id=7&Itemid=34. Retrieved 17 September 2007. 
  45. ^ "AVEN Homepage". Asexual Visibility and Education Network. http://www.asexuality.org/home/index.php. Retrieved 17 September 2007. 
  46. ^ Carrigan, Mark (2011). "There’s more to life than sex? Differences and commonality within the asexual community". Sexualities 14 (4): 462-478. doi:10.1177/1363460711406462. 
  47. ^ "About Asexuality". Asexual Visibility and Education Network. http://www.asexuality.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=section&id=6&Itemid=28. Retrieved 18 September 2007. 
  48. ^ Engelman, Jessica. "Asexuality as a Human Sexual Orientation." Serendip. Serendip, 2006. Web. 20 Nov. 2011. <http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/1870>.
  49. ^ http://hrc.vermont.gov/sites/hrc/files/pdfs/harassment%20docs/gender_sex_sexual_orientation_definitions.pdf
  50. ^ http://www.ag.ny.gov/bureaus/civil_rights/sonda_brochure.html
  51. ^ http://www.islamawareness.net/Marriage/fatwa_16.html
  52. ^ http://www.islamawareness.net/Marriage/marriage.html
  53. ^ http://www.jannah.org/sisters/marr.html
  54. ^ Lavey, Anton (1969). The Satanic Bible. Avon Books. pp. 272. ISBN 9780380015399. 
  55. ^ http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xa1z2g_asex-101-part-1-of-3_gaylesbian
  56. ^ http://www.asexuality.org/en/index.php?showtopic=43943&st=0&p=1369820&hl=symbol&fromsearch=1&#entry1369820
  57. ^ http://www.asexuality.org/en/index.php?showtopic=40185
  58. ^ http://www.asexuality.org/en/index.php?showtopic=43173
  59. ^ http://www.apositive.org/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=378
  60. ^ http://www.asexuality.org/en/index.php?/topic/53110-asexual-flag-round-three/
  61. ^ http://www.asexuality.org/en/index.php?/topic/53435-asexual-flag-and-the-winner-is/
  62. ^ http://queersecrets.tumblr.com/post/900132090
  63. ^ Gorey, Edward (2002). Ascending Peculiarity: Edward Gorey on Edward Gorey. Harvest Books. ISBN 978-0156012911. 
  64. ^ Bridgeman, Shelley (5 August 2007). "No Sex Please, We're Asexual". The New Zealand Herald. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/6/story.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=10455823. Retrieved 31 August 2007. 
  65. ^ [1] Pitchfork interview published on 11.16.09.
  66. ^ Steinfeld, Dave (June 2010). "Interview with Emilie Autumn". Curve Magazine. http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/curve/20_5/?ap=1#/56. Retrieved 5 July 2010. 
  67. ^ McClear, Sheila. "‘Project Runway’ mentor takes no prisoners". New York Post. http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/fashion/fashions_night_out/gunn_slinger_zlPlWaab0rcZky6Ah8DDFN#ixzz0ztUEIdZF. Retrieved 2010-09-10. 
  68. ^ Suarez, J.M.. "'Janeane Garofalo: If You Will': 'Life Is Too Long to Worry About the Afterlife'". PopMatters. http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/131684-janeane-garofalo-if-you-will. Retrieved 2010-10-04. 
  69. ^ https://twitter.com/#!/skinnermike/status/2836103122
  70. ^ http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2571/was-the-author-of-em-peter-pan-em-a-pedophile
  71. ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._M._Barrie
  72. ^ Pulvers, Roger (2007). "Introduction". In Miyazawa, Kenji. Strong in the Rain: Selected Poems. Trans. Roger Pulvers. Bloodaxe Books. pp. 9-28. ISBN 9781852247812. "Kenji, it must be remembered, was a man who displayed no particular interest in romantic love or sex." 
  73. ^ Tear Away Article

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • asexuality — n. having no evident sex or sex organs. Syn: sexlessness. [WordNet 1.5] …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • asexuality — 1877; see ASEXUAL (Cf. asexual) + ITY (Cf. ity) …   Etymology dictionary

  • asexuality — asexual ► ADJECTIVE 1) Biology without sex or sexual organs. 2) (of reproduction) not involving the fusion of gametes. 3) without sexual feelings or associations. DERIVATIVES asexuality noun asexually adverb …   English terms dictionary

  • asexuality — noun see asexual …   New Collegiate Dictionary

  • asexuality — See asexual. * * * …   Universalium

  • asexuality — noun a) The state or quality of being asexual, that is: b) The state of not experiencing sexual attraction. Compare heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality …   Wiktionary

  • asexuality — asex·u·al·i·ty (a″seks u alґĭ te) the state of being asexual; absence of sexual interests …   Medical dictionary

  • asexuality — n. lack of sexuality or sexual reproductive organs …   English contemporary dictionary

  • asexuality — noun having no evident sex or sex organs • Syn: ↑sexlessness • Derivationally related forms: ↑sexless (for: ↑sexlessness), ↑asexual • Hypernyms: ↑p …   Useful english dictionary

  • asexual — asexuality /ay sek shooh al i tee/, n. asexually, adv. /ay sek shooh euhl/, adj. 1. Biol. a. having no sex or sexual organs. b. independent of sexual processes, esp. not involving the union of male and female germ cells. 2. free from or… …   Universalium

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”