- Northwest Ordinance
-
Events leading to
the U.S. Civil War- Northwest Ordinance
- Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions
- Missouri Compromise
- Tariff of 1828
- Nullification Crisis
- Nat Turner's slave rebellion
- The Amistad
- Texas Annexation
- Mexican–American War
- Wilmot Proviso
- Ostend Manifesto
- Manifest Destiny
- Underground Railroad
- Fugitive Slave Act of 1850
- Compromise of 1850
- Uncle Tom's Cabin
- Kansas–Nebraska Act
- Bleeding Kansas
- Bleeding Sumner
- Dred Scott v. Sandford
- Brown's raid on Harper's Ferry
- 1860 presidential election
- Secession of Southern States
- Star of the West
- Corwin Amendment
- Battle of Fort Sumter
The Northwest Ordinance (formally An Ordinance for the Government of the Territory of the United States, North-West of the River Ohio, and also known as the Freedom Ordinance or "The Ordinance of 1787") was an act of the Congress of the Confederation of the United States, passed July 13, 1787. The primary effect of the ordinance was the creation of the Northwest Territory as the first organized territory of the United States out of the region south of the Great Lakes, north and west of the Ohio River, and east of the Mississippi River.
On August 7, 1789, the newly created U.S. Congress affirmed the Ordinance with slight modifications under the Constitution. The Ordinance purported to be not merely legislation that could later be amended by Congress, but rather "the following articles shall be considered as Articles of compact between the original States and the people and states in the said territory, and forever remain unalterable, unless by common consent...."[1]
Arguably the single most important piece of legislation passed by members of the earlier Continental Congresses other than the Declaration of Independence, it established the precedent by which the federal government would be sovereign and expand westward across North America with the admission of new states, rather than with the expansion of existing states and their established sovereignty under the Articles of Confederation. It is the most important legislation that Congress has ever passed with regard to American public domain lands.[2]
Further, the prohibition of slavery in the territory had the effect of establishing the Ohio River as the boundary between free and slave territory in the region between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River. This division helped set the stage for the balancing act between free and slave states that was the basis of a critical political question in American politics in the 19th century until the Civil War.
Contents
Context and history
Main article: Northwest TerritorySince earliest times, rivers have been the arteries of inland travel, and the history of exploration in America is woven about its waterways. Having been excluded from known sea routes to the orient, based in European trade, political and religious considerations set in 1493,[3] the early French and British explorers in the area were fueled in part by the search for the mythic water route know as the Northwest Passage. With the English settlement concentrated along the Atlantic coast, the French established dominance over the inland areas, with the help of native Indian knowledge. From 1660 to 1670, French Jesuit Missions extended into the new territory, with establishments at the Sault and Green Bay, and in 1673, Fathers Marquette and Joliet traveled south on Lake Michigan to Green Bay, crossed the divide of the Fox into the Wisconsin and reached the Mississippi River, from where they continued southward passing the confluence of the Pekistanoui from the west, the Ohio from the east, and until noting signs of Spanish influence from the south. This exploration largely defined the known limits of the Northwest Territories. Between 1673 and 1689 La Salle opened another water route from the St. Lawrence, through the Niagara and the Great Lakes and across the Chicago portage to the Mississippi. He founded forts on the St. Joseph, in Michigan, and on the Illinois River and farther south. LaSalle understood the meaning of the crossing paths of French and Spanish exploration from opposite directions, and outlined the main lines of future French strategy in North America; he recognized the Mississippi as the key to control of the vast continental heartland, and the Ohio River became the line beyond which they would attempt to bar Britsh expansion from the east. This lasted for nearly a hundred years under French colonial rule and another twenty under the British. During this time the waterways became the transportation and trading routes which yielded the inland's vast riches; they were both a source of European rivalry and the object of future American developmental desire.[4]
The territory was acquired by Great Britain from France following their defeat and the 1763 Treaty of Paris. The Ohio Country, as its eastern portion was known, was now in British hands, but a few months later it was closed to new European settlement by the Royal Proclamation of 1763 for British considerations of continental control; this in essence locked the thirteen colonies between the Appalachians and the Atlantic and raised tensions. With the subsequent settler's victory in the American Revolutionary War and signing of the 1783 Treaty of Paris, the United States claimed the territory, as well as those south of the Ohio; but the territories still remained subject to overlapping and conflicting claims of the states of Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, and Virginia dating from their colonial past, as well as a lingering British presence that was not settled until after the Louisiana Purchase and the War of 1812.
The region had long been desired for expansion by colonists, however, and urgency of the settlement of the claims of the states was prompted in large measure by the de facto opening of the area to settlement following the loss of British control.
In 1784, Thomas Jefferson proposed that the states should relinquish their particular claims to all the territory west of the Appalachians, and the area should be divided into new states of the Union. Thomas Jefferson's proposal of creating a federal domain through state cessions of western lands came from earlier proposals dating back to 1776 debates about the Articles of Confederation.[5] Jefferson proposed creating seventeen roughly rectangular states from the territory, and even suggested names for the new states, including Chersonesus, Sylvania, Assenisipia, Metropotamia, Polypotamia, Pelisipia, Saratoga, Washington, Michigania and Illinoia. The proposal was adopted in a modified form, as the Land Ordinance of 1784. This ordinance established the example that would become the basis for the Northwest Ordinance three years later; Jefferson's invented names largely would not followed but Michigan, Illinois, and Washington would eventually become state names.
The 1784 ordinance was criticized by George Washington in 1785 and James Monroe in 1786. Monroe convinced Congress to reconsider the proposed state boundaries and a committee was formed which recommended repealing that part of the ordinance. Other politicians questioned the 1784 ordinance's plan for organizing governments in new states, and worried that the new states' relatively small size would undermine the original states' power in Congress. Other events such as the reluctance of states south of the Ohio River to cede their western claims resulted in a narrowed geographic focus.[5]
Nonetheless when passed in New York in 1787, the Northwest Ordinance maintained its derivation from the Continental Congress committee headed by Thomas Jefferson. It still called for dividing the territory into gridded townships, so that once the lands were surveyed, they could be sold to individuals and speculative land companies, and thus would create both a new source of federal government revenue and provide an orderly pattern for future settlement. While the Continental Congress laid out this plan for nation expansion, nation-building and continental foreign policy, the delegates at the ongoing Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were hammering out a plan for a new federal government.[6]
Effects of the legislation
Abolition and transfer of state claims
Main article: State cessionsThe passage of the ordinance, which ceded all unsettled lands to the federal government and established the public domain, followed the relinquishing of all such claims over the territory by the states. These territories were to be administered directly by Congress, with the intent of their eventual admission as newly created states. The legislation was revolutionary in that it established the precedent for new lands to be administered by the central government, albeit temporarily, rather than under the jurisdiction of the individually sovereign original states, as it was with the Articles of Confederation. The legislation also broke colonial precedent by defining future use of the natural navigation, transportation and communication routes; it did so in a way that anticipated future acquisitions beyond the Northwest Territories, and established federal policy.[4] Article 4 states: "The navigable waters leading into the Mississippi and St. Lawrence, and the carrying places between the same, shall be common highways and forever free, as well to the inhabitants of the said territory as to the citizens of the United States, and those of any other States that may be admitted into the confederacy, without any tax, impost, or duty therefor."
Admission of new states
The most significant intended purpose of this legislation was its mandate for the creation of new states from the region, once a population of 60,000 had been achieved within a particular territory. The actual legal mechanism of the admission of new states was established in the Enabling Act of 1802. The first state created from the Northwest Territory was Ohio, in 1803, at which time the remainder was renamed Indiana Territory. The other four states were Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin. A significant portion (about 1/3) of Minnesota was also part of the territory.
Establishment of territorial government
As an organic act, the ordinance created a civil government in the territory under the direct jurisdiction of the Congress. The ordinance was thus the prototype for the subsequent organic acts that created organized territories during the westward expansion of the United States. It specifically provided for the appointment by Congress of a Territorial Governor with a three-year term, a Territorial Secretary with a four-year term, and three Judges, with no set limit to their term. As soon as there was a population of 5,000 "free male inhabitants of full age", they could form a general assembly for a legislature. In 1789, the U.S. Congress made minor changes, such that the President, with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, had the power to appoint and remove the Governor and officers of the territory instead of Congress. The Territorial Secretary was authorized to act for the Governor, if he died, was absent, was removed, or resigned from office.
Establishment of Natural Rights
The Natural Rights provisions of the ordinance foreshadowed the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution.[7] Many of the concepts and guarantees of the Ordinance of 1787 were incorporated in the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In the Northwest Territory, various legal and property rights were enshrined, religious tolerance was proclaimed, and it was enunciated that since "Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged." The right of habeas corpus was written into the charter, as was freedom of religious worship and bans on excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishment. Trial by jury and a ban on ex post facto laws were also rights granted.
Prohibition of slavery
"There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory."[8] The language of the ordinance seems to ban slavery, but it continued almost until the Civil War.[9] Southern states voted for the law apparently because they did not want to compete over tobacco. The balance of slave states would not be affected with slavery south of the Ohio River in 1790.[10]
"Virginia, it is well known, in the year 1784, ceded to the United States then united only by the original Articles of Confederation her vast possessions northwest of the Ohio, from which the great States of Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota, have since been formed. In 1787 before the adoption of the Federal Constitution the celebrated "Ordinance" for the government of this Northwestern Territory was adopted by the Congress, with the full consent, and indeed at the express instance, of Virginia. This Ordinance included six definite "Articles of compact between the original States and the people and States in the said Territory," which were to "for ever remain unalterable unless by common consent." The sixth of these articles ordains that "there shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said Territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."[11]
Article VI required fugitive slaves to be returned, giving slave owners unprecedented support not previously available.[12]
Definition of the Midwest as a region
The Northwest Ordinance, along with the Land Ordinance of 1785, laid the legal and cultural groundwork for midwestern (and subsequently, western) development. Significantly, the free state legal philosophies of both Abraham Lincoln and Salmon P. Chase (Chief Justice, Senator, and early Ohio law author) were derived from the Northwest Ordinance.
Effects on Native Americans
In two articles, the Northwest Ordinance mentions the Native Americans within this region:
- "The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians; their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent; and, in their property, rights, and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars authorized by Congress; but laws founded in justice and humanity, shall from time to time be made for preventing wrongs being done to them, and for preserving peace and friendship with them."[13]
This section became more of a nominal provision than a real one, as in an earlier section, it assumes that:
- "...the governor shall make proper divisions thereof... to lay out the parts of the district in which the Indian titles shall have been extinguished, into counties and townships."[14]
Many Native Americans in Ohio, who were not parties, refused to acknowledge treaties signed after the Revolutionary War that ceded lands north of the Ohio River inhabited by them to the United States. In a conflict sometimes known as the Northwest Indian War, Blue Jacket of the Shawnees and Little Turtle of the Miamis formed a confederation to stop white expropriation of the territory. After the Indian confederation had killed more than 800 soldiers in two battles — the worst defeats ever suffered by the U.S. at the hands of the Indians — President Washington assigned General Anthony Wayne command of a new army, which eventually defeated the confederation and thus allowed European-Americans to continue settling the territory.
See also
References
- ^ Story, Joseph. Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States: with a preliminary review of the constitutional history of the colonies and states before the adoption of the Constitution, p. 228 n. 1 (Little, Brown, 1873): “One party could not change or absolve itself from the obligation to obey them”.
- ^ Shōsuke Satō, History of the land question in the United States], Johns Hopkins University, (1886), p.352
- ^ See: Pope Alexander VI and Inter caetera
- ^ a b The Nation and its Water Resources, Leonard B. Dworsky, Division of Water Supply and Pollution Control, United States Public Health Service, 167pp., 1962. 2005 Edition
- ^ a b Hubbard, Bill, Jr. (2009). American Boundaries: the Nation, the States, the Rectangular Survey. University of Chicago Press. pp. 46–47, 114. ISBN 978-0-226-35591-7.
- ^ Jerel A. Rosati, James M. Scott, The Politics of United States Foreign Policy, Cengage Learning, 2010, p.20
- ^ Chardavoyne, David G. (2006). "The Northwest Ordinance and Michigan's Territorial Heritage". In Finkelman, Paul; Hershock, Martin J.. The history of Michigan law. Ohio University Press series on law, society, and politics in the Midwest. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. ISBN 9780821416617. OCLC 65205057. http://books.google.com/books?id=jjSD45-P2_YC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA13#v=onepage&q&f=false. Retrieved November 30, 2010. "Its provisions established a structure of government that encouraged settlement of that vast region and provided those settlers a startling set of civil rights that presaged the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights"
- ^ http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nworder.asp
- ^ Evading the Ordinance: The Persistence of Bondage in Indiana and Illinois|Paul Finkelman| Journal of the Early Republic Vol. 9, No. 1 (Spring, 1989)|, pp. 21
- ^ Student's guide to landmark congressional laws on civil rights|Paul Finkelman| Marcus D. Pohlmann, Linda Vallar Whisenhunt| Greenwood Press, 2002|, pp. 14-15
- ^ Davis, Jefferson. "The Rise and Fall of the confederate Government. Volume I, page 7.
- ^ Slavery and the Northwest Ordinance: A Study in Ambiguity| Paul Finkelman| Journal of the Early Republic Vol. 6, No. 4 (Winter, 1986)|, pp. 345
- ^ http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=8&page=transcript Transcript of the Northwest Ordinance - 1787. An Ordinance for the government of the Territory of the United States northwest of the River Ohio. Section 14, Article 3. Retrieved December 12, 2010
- ^ http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=8&page=transcript Northwest Ordinance - 1787: An Ordinance for the government of the Territory of the United States northwest of the River Ohio. Retrieve December 12, 2010.
External links
- Facsimile of 1789 Act
- Nathan Dane was a Massachusetts attorney and delegate to the Continental Congress, 1785-1787. He helped draft the Ordinance of 1787 under which western regions were to be governed and ultimately admitted to the union. This letter was written in New York, shortly after Dane's committee had drafted the Ordinance, to his colleague Rufus King in Philadelphia. Dane describes how the work was progressing and how he slipped in language outlawing slavery from the new territories.
- Cyclopædia of Political Science, Political Economy, and the Political History of the United States by the Best American and European Writers Editor: Lalor, John J. (?-1899) Published: New York: Maynard, Merrill, and Co., 1899. First published: 1881. From the Library of Economics and Liberty.
- Student's guide to landmark congressional laws on civil rights By Marcus D. Pohlmann, Linda Vallar Whisenhunt
Aboriginal title in the United States Statutes Colonial era: Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions (1629; New Netherland) Royal Proclamation of 1763 (British North America) · Confederation Congress Proclamation of 1783 · Northwest Ordinance (1787) · Nonintercourse Act (1790, 1793, 1796, 1799, 1802, and 1834) · Removal Act (1830) · Dawes Act (1887) · Curtis Act of 1898 · Reorganization Act (1934) · Indian Claims Commission Act (1946) · Indian Land Claims Settlements (1978—2006) · Indian Claims Limitations Act (1982)Precedents Marshall Court: Johnson v. M'Intosh (1823); Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) · Taney Court: Fellows v. Blacksmith (1857); New York ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble (1858) · Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy (1896) · United States v. Santa Fe Pac. R.R. (1941) · Warren Court: Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States (1955); Fed. Power Comm'n v. Tuscarora Indian Nation (1960) · Burger Court: Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. State v. Oneida Cnty. (1974); Oneida Cnty. v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. State (1985); South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe (1986) · Rehnquist Court: Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho (1997); Idaho v. United States (2001); City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. (2005)By state Alaska · California · Hawaii · Indiana · Louisiana · Maine · New Mexico · New York · Rhode Island · VermontCompare Categories:- Northwest Territory
- 1787 in law
- 1787 in the United States
- Aboriginal title in the United States
- History of the Midwestern United States
- History of the United States (1776–1789)
- Ordinances of the Continental Congress
- United States federal public land legislation
- United States federal territory and statehood legislation
- United States historical documents
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.