- Domestic partnership in Washington
-
Legal recognition of
same-sex relationshipsMarriage Performed in some jurisdictions Mexico: Mexico City
United States: CT, DC, IA, MA, NH, NY, VT, Coquille, SuquamishRecognized, not performed Aruba (Netherlands only)
Curaçao (Netherlands only)
Israel
Mexico: all states (Mexico City only)
Sint Maarten (Netherlands only)
United States: CA (conditional), MDCivil unions and
registered partnershipsPerformed in some jurisdictions Australia: ACT, NSW, TAS, VIC
Mexico: COA
United States: CA, CO, DE, HI, IL, ME, NJ, NV, OR, RI, WA, WIUnregistered cohabitation Recognized in some jurisdictions See also Same-sex marriage
Same-sex marriage legislation
Timeline of same-sex marriage
Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe
Marriage privatization
Civil union
Domestic partnership
Listings by countryLGBT portal State Registered Domestic Partnerships (SRDP) in Washington were created in the aftermath of the Andersen v. King County decision. Subsequent legislation has made a SRDP the equivalent of marriage under state law.
Contents
History of Washington Domestic Partnerships
See also: Same-sex marriage in WashingtonBeginnings
In its Anderson v. King County decision, the Washington Supreme Court noted the Legislature was free to revisit any law it had previously enacted. Lacking sufficient votes to change the marriage laws, the Legislature worked to pass a domestic partnership law.[1] After much debate, lawmakers approved a bill on April 10, 2007.[2] conferring eleven of the rights of marriage to same-sex couples and straight couples (when at least one of the individuals is over the age of 62). Governor Christine Gregoire signed the bill April 21, 2007,[3] and the law took effect on July 22, 2007.
The first partnerships were registered July 23, 2007, the first business day after the law’s effective date. More than 100 couples registered on the first day — some showing up as early as 4 a.m.[4]
Expansion
Similar to California’s incremental approach with its domestic partnership laws, the Washington Legislature has expanded the scope of partnerships. On March 4, 2008, lawmakers approved adding over 170 rights and responsibilities to domestic partnerships.[5] The bill was signed by Governor Gregoire on March 12, 2008.[6] Washington domestic partners do not need to re-register to take advantage of the new benefits. Because of the significant changes in 2008, the Secretary of State’s office mailed a letter to the last known address of each SRDP informing them of the changes. The new law became effective on June 12, 2008.
Lawmakers backing the domestic partnership legislation have been open in stating that their ultimate intent is to expand marriage laws to include same-sex couples and that they see the creation and expansion of domestic partnerships as steps toward that goal.[7] To that end, civil marriage equality bills have been introduced to encourage discussion.[8][9]
2009
“Everything but marriage”
Again like California, lawmakers continued to extend the rights and responsibilities of domestic partners. Legislation introduced on January 28, 2009 intended to provide “everything but marriage” to domestic partners.[10] Senate Bill 5688[11] would amend many state laws and place domestic partnership on an equal footing with civil marriage.[12] Despite the attempts to provide equal benefits to domestic partners, the law does not change Washington’s restriction against same-sex marriages.[13]
“Although we view this as an improvement that provides real and concrete protections to same-sex partners, it’s an inadequate substitute for marriage,” said Representative Jamie Pedersen, the House sponsor of the bill.[14]
The legislation cleared the Senate on March 10, 2009 and the House on April 15, 2009. Governor Gregoire signed it into law on May 18, 2009.[15]
Referendum 71
Main article: Washington Referendum 71 (2009)The legislation was meant to come into force on July 26, 2009, but Referendum 71 was filed seeking to overturn the expansion. At the last possible moment, opponents submitted enough signatures to postpone the law and force a popular vote on the new law.[16]
Groups such as Equal Rights Washington and Washington Families Standing Together urged voters to uphold the law providing for domestic partnerships, while Protect Marriage Washington was the main group in opposition.
Washington’s voters approved the law 53.15% to 46.85%[17] — this marked the first time in the United States that voters had approved a state-wide ballot measure that extended LGBT relationship rights.[18] The law went into effect the day the election was certified, December 3, 2009.[19]
Rights and responsibilities
Original laws
After 2008’s expanded domestic partnership law took effect, some of the domestic partner’s benefits and responsibilities include:[20]
- Visitation, health care decision-making, and information-access rights
- Inheritance and administration rights
- Burial, disposition, organ donation, autopsy, and wrongful death claim rights
- A domestic partner has testimonial privileges in court
- Community property and dissolution laws apply
- Domestic partners may sue on behalf of the community
- Domestic violence statutes apply
- Certain property transfers between partners are not taxed
- State veterans benefits apply
- Appointed and elected officials’ partners subjected to same laws as married officials’ spouses
Post-Referendum 71
Under state law, domestic partners shall be treated the same as married spouses. Some of the more notable changes include:
- Use of sick leave to care for a domestic partner
- Rights to injured partners’ wages and benefits and unpaid wages upon death of a partner
- Access to unemployment, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation coverage
- Access to insurance continuance rights after the death of a domestic partner
- Rights related to adoption, child custody and child support
- Business succession rights
Registration
Domestic partnerships are issued by the Secretary of State’s Corporations Division in Olympia. Couples can register in person or by mail. Couples wishing to enter into a SRDP are required to fill out an application,[21] have it notarized, and pay the filing fee. Once the application is received, the Secretary of State’s office will issue a certificate and a wallet card for each individual.
Registrations are public records — information can be searched on the Secretary of State’s domestic partnership page.[22]
Because a SRDP may be less familiar than marriage to some, the wallet cards or online verification can be used to prove a partner’s relationship, especially during an emergency.
See also
- LGBT rights in Washington
- Same-sex marriage in the United States
- Civil union in the United States
- Domestic partnership in the United States
References
- ^ Garber, Andrew (March 1, 2007). "Domestic partnership bill passes state Senate". Seattle Times. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2003595548_webpartnershipbill01.html. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "SB 5336". Washington State Legislature. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=5336&year=2007. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "Governor Gregoire Signs Legislation Giving Legal Rights to Domestic Partners". Office of the Governor. http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=551&newsType=1. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ Garber, Andrew (July 24, 2007). "Gay partners make it official". Seattle Times. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003803177_partners24m.html. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "HB 3104". Washington State Legislature. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=3104&year=2007. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "Gov. Gregoire signs bill extending domestic partnership rights". Office of the Governor. http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=815&newsType=1. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ La Corte, Rachel (March 12, 2008). "Gregoire signs law expanding domestic partner benefits". Seattle Times. Associated Press. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004278712_webdomestic12.html. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "HB 1350". Washington State Legislature. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=1350&year=2007. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "HB 1745". Washington State Legislature. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=1745&year=2009. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ La Corte, Rachel (January 28, 2009). "Lawmakers announce “everything but marriage” bill". Seattle Times. Associated Press. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008678540_apwaxgrdomesticpartnerships2ndldwritethru.html. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "SB 5688". Washington State Legislature. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=5688&year=2009. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ Fairbanks, Madelyn. "Work on gay rights just getting started". Seattle Times. Associated Press. http://www.seattlepi.com/local/397891_domestic29.html. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "RCW 26.04.010". Washington State Legislature. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=26.04.010. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ 365gay Newscenter Staff. "Wash. mulls major expansion of gay partner law". http://www.365gay.com/news/wash-mulls-major-expansion-of-gay-partner-law/. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "Gov. Gregoire signs legislation to expand rights to domestic partners". Office of the Governor. http://www.governor.wa.gov/news/news-view.asp?pressRelease=1236&newsType=1. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ La Corte, Rachel (August 31, 2009). "Gay partnership referendum makes ballot". Seattle Times. Associated Press. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009781794_apusdomesticpartnerships4thldwritethru.html. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "November 3, 2009 General Election". Secretary of State. http://vote.wa.gov/Elections/WEI/ResultsByCounty.aspx?ElectionID=32&RaceID=102369&CountyCode=%20&JurisdictionTypeID=-2&RaceTypeCode=M&ViewMode=Results. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ La Corte, Rachel. "Voters approve ‘everything but marriage’ bill". Associated Press. http://www.komonews.com/news/69333537.html. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ Ammons, David. "R-71: Effective 12-3-09". From Our Corner. http://blogs.sos.wa.gov/FromOurCorner/index.php/2009/11/r-71-effective-12-3-09/. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "A summary of 2008 changes to state laws regarding domestic partnerships" (PDF). Secretary of State. http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/domesticpartnerships/rights_responsibilites_dp.pdf. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "Domestic Partnership declaration" (PDF). Secretary of State. http://www.sos.wa.gov/_assets/corps/domesticpartnerships/DomesticPartnerships2.pdf. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
- ^ "Domestic Partnerships". Secretary of State. http://www.sos.wa.gov/corps/domesticpartnerships/. Retrieved March 19, 2010.
Same-sex unions in the United States Main articles: State constitutional amendments banning (List by type) - Public opinion (Opponents - List of supporters) - Status by state (Law - Legislation) - Municipal domestic partnership registries Same-sex marriage legalized: Connecticut - District of Columbia - Iowa - Massachusetts - New Hampshire - New York - Vermont - Coquille, SuquamishSame-sex marriage recognized,
but not performed:California*# - MarylandCivil union or domestic partnership legal: California - Colorado - Delaware - District of Columbia - Hawaii - Illinois - Maine - Maryland - Nevada - New Jersey - Oregon - Rhode Island - Washington - WisconsinSame-sex marriage prohibited by statute: Delaware - Hawaii - Illinois - Indiana - Maine - Maryland - Minnesota - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Puerto Rico - Washington - West Virginia - WyomingSame-sex marriage prohibited
by constitutional amendment:Alaska - Arizona - California# - Colorado - Mississippi - Missouri - Montana - Nevada - Oregon - TennesseeAll types of same-sex unions prohibited
by constitutional amendment:Recognition of same-sex unions undefined
by statute or constitutional amendment:American Samoa - Guam - New MexicoNotes:
*All out-of-state same-sex marriages are given the benefits of marriage under California law, although only those performed before November 5, 2008 are granted the designation "marriage".
# California's ban on same-sex marriage remains in limbo following a federal case finding the ban unconstitutional, which is stayed pending appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.Categories:- Recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States
- Washington (state) law
- LGBT in Washington (state)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.