Constantine I

Infobox Roman emperor
title = Emperor of the Roman Empire
name=Constantine I
full name =Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus


caption =Head of Constantine's colossal statue at the Capitoline Museums
reign =25 July 306 – 29 October 312 (hailed as Augustus in the West, officially made Caesar by Galerius with Severus as Augustus, by agreement with Maximian, refused relegation to Caesar in 309)
29 October 312 – 19 September 324 (undisputed Augustus in the West, senior Augustus in the empire)
19 September 324 – 22 May 337 (emperor of united empire)
predecessor =Constantius Chlorus
successor =Constantine II, Constantius II and Constans
spouse 1 =Minervina, died or divorced before 307
spouse 2 =Fausta
children =Constantina, Helena, Crispus, Constantine II, Constantius II and Constans
dynasty =Constantinian
father =Constantius Chlorus
mother =Helena
venerated_in =Anglicanism
Eastern Orthodoxy
Lutheranism
Oriental Orthodoxy
Roman Catholicism
date of birth =27 February "ca". 272
place of birth =Naissus (modern Niš, Serbia)
date of death =22 May 337
place of death = Nicomedia (modern Izmit, Turkey)
place of burial =
religion = Christian |

Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus [In (Latin Constantine's official imperial title was IMPERATOR CAESAR FLAVIVS CONSTANTINVS PIVS FELIX INVICTVS AVGVSTVS, "Imperator Caesar Flavius Constantine Augustus, the pious, the fortunate, the undefeated". After 312, he added MAXIMVS ("the greatest"), and after 325 replaced ("undefeated") with VICTOR, as "invictus" reminded of Sol Invictus, the Sun God.] (27 February "ca". 272Birth dates vary but most modern historians use "ca". 272". Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 59.] – 22 May 337), commonly known as Constantine I, Constantine the Great, or Saint Constantine (among Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox and Byzantine Catholic Christians), was Roman Emperor from 306, and the undisputed holder of that office from 324 to his death. Best known for being the first Christian Roman Emperor, Constantine reversed the persecutions of his predecessor, Diocletian, and issued (with his co-emperor Licinius) the Edict of Milan in 313, which proclaimed religious toleration throughout the empire.

The Byzantine liturgical calendar, observed by the Eastern Orthodox Church and Eastern Catholic Churches of Byzantine rite, lists both Constantine and his mother Helena as saints. Although he is not included in the Latin Church's list of saints, which does recognize several other Constantines as saints, he is revered under the title "The Great" for his contributions to Christianity.

Constantine also transformed the ancient Greek colony of Byzantium into a new imperial residence, Constantinople, which would remain the capital of the Byzantine Empire for over a thousand years.

ources

As the Emperor who empowered Christianity throughout the Roman Empire and moved the Roman capital to the banks of the Bosphorus, Constantine was a ruler of major historical importance, but he has always been a controversial figure. [Barnes, "CE", 272.] The fluctuations in Constantine's reputation reflect the nature of the ancient sources for his reign. These are abundant and detailed, [Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 14; Cameron, 90–91; Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 2–3.] but have been strongly influenced by the official propaganda of the period, [Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 23–25; Cameron, 90–91; Southern, 169.] and are often one-sided. [Cameron, 90; Southern, 169.] There are no surviving histories or biographies dealing with Constantine's life and rule. [Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 14; Corcoran, "Empire of the Tetrarchs", 1; Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 2–3.] The nearest replacement is Eusebius of Caesarea's "Vita Constantini", a work that is a mixture of eulogy and hagiography. [Barnes, "CE", 265–68.] Written between 335 and circa 339, [Drake, "What Eusebius Knew," 21.] the "Vita" extols Constantine's moral and religious virtues. [Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 1.11; Odahl, 3.] The "Vita" creates a contentiously positive image of Constantine, [Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 5; Storch, 145–55.] and modern historians have frequently challenged its reliability. [Barnes, "CE", 265–71; Cameron, 90–92; Cameron and Hall, 4–6; Elliott, "Eusebian Frauds in the "Vita Constantini"", 162–71.] The fullest secular life of Constantine is the anonymous "Origo Constantini". [Lieu and Montserrat, 39; Odahl, 3.] A work of uncertain date, [Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 26; Lieu and Montserrat, 40; Odahl, 3.] the "Origo" focuses on military and political events, to the neglect of cultural and religious matters. [Lieu and Montserrat, 40; Odahl, 3.]

Lactantius' "De Mortibus Persecutorum", a polemical Christian pamphlet on the reigns of Diocletian and the Tetrarchy, provides valuable but tendentious detail on Constantine's predecessors and early life. [Barnes, "CE", 12–14; Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 24; Mackay, 207; Odahl, 9–10.] The ecclesiastical histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret describe the ecclesiastic disputes of Constantine's later reign. [Barnes, "CE", 225; Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 28–29; Odahl, 4–6.] Written during the reign of Theodosius II (408–50), a century after Constantine's reign, these ecclesiastic historians obscure the events and theologies of the Constantinian period through misdirection, misrepresentation and deliberate obscurity. [Barnes, "CE", 225; Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 26–29; Odahl, 5–6.] The contemporary writings of the Orthodox Christian Athanasius and the ecclesiastical history of the Arian Philostorgius also survive, though their biases are no less firm. [Odahl, 6, 10.]

The epitomes of Aurelius Victor ("De Caesaribus"), Eutropius ("Breviarium"), Festus ("Breviarium"), and the anonymous author of the "Epitome de Caesaribus" offer compressed secular political and military histories of the period. Although pagan, the epitomes paint a favorable image of Constantine, but omit reference to Constantine's religious policies. [Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 27–28; Lieu and Montserrat, 2–6; Odahl, 6–7; Warmington, 166–67.] The "Panegyrici Latini", a collection of panegyrics from the late third and early fourth centuries, provide valuable information on the politics and ideology of the tetrarchic period and the early life of Constantine. [Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 24; Odahl, 8.] Contemporary architecture, like the Arch of Constantine in Rome and palaces in Gamzigrad and Córdoba, [Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 20–21; Johnson, "Architecture of Empire" (CC), 288–91; Odahl, 11–12.] epigraphic remains, and the coinage of the era complement the literary sources. [Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), 17–21; Odahl, 11–14.]

Early life

Constantine, named Flavius Valerius Constantinus, was born in the Moesian military city of Naissus (Niš, Serbia) on the 27th of February of an uncertain year, [Barnes, "CE", 3, 39–42; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 17; Odahl, 15; Pohlsander, "Constantine I"; Southern, 169, 341.] probably near 272. [Barnes, "CE", 3; Barnes, "New Empire", 39–42; Elliott, "Constantine's Conversion," 425–6; Elliott, "Eusebian Frauds," 163; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 17; Jones, 13–14; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 59; Odahl, 16; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 14; Rodgers, 238; Wright, 495, 507.] His father was Flavius Constantius, a native of Moesia Superior (later Dacia Ripensis).Barnes, "CE", 3; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 59–60; Odahl, 16–17.] Constantius was a tolerant and politically skilled man. ["Panegyrici Latini" 8(5), 9(4); Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 8.7; Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 1.13.3; Barnes, "CE", 13, 290.] Constantine probably spent little time with his father. [MacMullen, "Constantine", 21.] Constantius was an officer in the Roman army in 272, part of the Emperor Aurelian's imperial bodyguard. Constantius advanced through the ranks, earning the governorship of Dalmatia from Emperor Diocletian, another of Aurelian's Illyrian companions, in 284 or 285. Constantine's mother was Helena, a Bithynian Greek of humble origin. It is uncertain whether she was legally married to Constantius or merely his concubine. [Barnes, "CE", 3; Barnes, "New Empire", 39–40; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 17; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 59, 83; Odahl, 16; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 14.]

In July 285, Diocletian declared Maximian, another colleague from Illyricum, his co-emperor. Each emperor would have his own court, his own military and administrative faculties, and each would rule with a separate praetorian prefect as chief lieutenant. [Barnes, "CE", 8–14; Corcoran, "Before Constantine" (CC), 41–54; Odahl, 46–50; Treadgold, 14–15.] Maximian ruled in the West, from his capitals at Mediolanum (Milan, Italy) or Augusta Treverorum (Trier, Germany), while Diocletian ruled in the East, from Nicomedia (İzmit, Turkey). The division was merely pragmatic: the Empire was called "indivisible" in official panegyric, [Bowman, 70; Potter, 283; Williams, 49, 65.] and both emperors could move freely throughout the Empire. [Potter, 283; Williams, 49, 65.] In 288, Maximian appointed Constantius to serve as his praetorian prefect in Gaul. Constantius left Helena to marry Maximian's stepdaughter Theodora in 288 or 289. [Barnes, "CE", 3; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 20; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 59–60; Odahl, 47, 299; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 14.]

Diocletian divided the Empire again in 293, appointing two Caesars (junior emperors) to rule over further subdivisions of East and West. Each would be subordinate to their respective Augustus (senior emperor) but would act with supreme authority in his assigned lands. This system would later be called the Tetrarchy. Diocletian's first appointee for the office of Caesar was Constantius; his second was Galerius, a native of Felix Romuliana (Gamzigrad, Serbia). According to Lactantius, Galerius was a brutal, animalistic man. Although he shared the paganism of Rome's aristocracy, he seemed to them an alien figure, a semi-barbarian. [Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 7.1; Barnes, "CE", 13, 290.] On 1 March, Constantius was promoted to the office of Caesar, and dispatched to Gaul to fight the rebels Carausius and Allectus. [Barnes, "CE", 3, 8; Corcoran, "Before Constantine" (CC), 40–41; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 20; Odahl, 46–47; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 8–9, 14; Treadgold, 17.] In spite of meritocratic overtones, the Tetrarchy retained vestiges of hereditary privilege, [Barnes, "CE", 8–9; Corcoran, "Before Constantine" (CC), 42–43, 54.] and Constantine became the prime candidate for future appointment as Caesar as soon as his father took the position. Constantine left the Balkans for the court of Diocletian, where he lived as his father's heir presumptive. [Barnes, "CE", 3; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 59–60; Odahl, 56–7.]

In the East

Constantine received a formidable education at Diocletian's court, where he learned Latin literature, Greek, and philosophy. [Barnes, "CE", 73–74; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 60; Odahl, 72, 301.] The cultural environment in Nicomedia was open, fluid and socially mobile, and Constantine could mix with intellectuals both pagan and Christian. He may have attended the lectures of Lactantius, a Christian scholar of Latin in the city. [Barnes, "CE", 47, 73–74; Fowden, "Between Pagans and Christians," 175–76.] Because Diocletian did not completely trust Constantius—none of the Tetrarchs fully trusted their colleagues—Constantine was held as something of a hostage, a tool to ensure Constantius' best behavior. Constantine was nonetheless a prominent member of the court: he fought for Diocletian and Galerius in Asia, and served in a variety of tribunates; he campaigned against barbarians on the Danube in 296, and fought the Persians under Diocletian in Syria (297) and under Galerius in Mesopotamia (298–99). [Constantine, "Oratio ad Sanctorum Coetum", 16.2; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 29–30; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 60; Odahl, 72–73.] By late 305, he had become a tribune of the first order, a "tribunus ordinis primi". [Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 29; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 61; Odahl, 72–74, 306; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 15. Contra: J. Moreau, "Lactance: "De la mort des persécuteurs", "Sources Chrétiennes" 39 (1954): 313; Barnes, "CE", 297.]

Constantine had returned to Nicomedia from the eastern front by the spring of 303, in time to witness the beginnings of Diocletian's "Great Persecution", the most severe persecution of Christians in Roman history. [Constantine, "Oratio ad Sanctorum Coetum" 25; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 30; Odahl, 73.] In late 302, Diocletian and Galerius sent a messenger to the oracle of Apollo at Didyma with an inquiry about Christians. [Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 10.6–11; Barnes, "CE", 21; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 35–36; MacMullen, "Constantine", 24; Odahl, 67; Potter, 338.] Constantine could recall his presence at the palace when the messenger returned, when Diocletian accepted his court's demands for universal persecution. [Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 2.49–52; Barnes, "CE", 21; Odahl, 67, 73, 304; Potter, 338.] On 23 February 303, Diocletian ordered the destruction of Nicomedia's new church, condemned its scriptures to the flame, and had its treasures seized. In the months that followed, churches and scriptures were destroyed, Christians were deprived of official ranks, and priests were imprisoned. [Barnes, "CE", 22–25; MacMullen, "Constantine", 24–30; Odahl, 67–69; Potter, 337.]

It is unlikely that Constantine played any role in the persecution. [MacMullen, "Constantine", 24–25.] In his later writings he would attempt to present himself as an opponent of Diocletian's "sanguinary edicts" against the "worshipers of God", ["Oratio ad Sanctorum Coetum" 25; Odahl, 73.] but nothing indicates that he opposed it effectively at the time. [Drake, "The Impact of Constantine on Christianity" (CC), 126; Elliott, "Constantine's Conversion," 425–26.] Although no contemporary Christian challenged Constantine for his inaction during the persecutions, it remained a political liability throughout his life. [Drake, "The Impact of Constantine on Christianity" (CC), 126.]

On 1 May 305, Diocletian, as a result of a debilitating sickness taken in the winter of 304–5, announced his resignation. In a parallel ceremony in Milan, Maximian did the same. [Barnes, "CE", 25–27; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 60; Odahl, 69–72; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 15; Potter, 341–42.] Lactantius states that Galerius manipulated the weakened Diocletian into resigning, and forced him to accept Galerius' allies in the imperial succession. According to Lactantius, the crowd listening to Diocletian's resignation speech believed, until the very last moment, that Diocletian would choose Constantine and Maxentius (Maximian's son) as his successors. [Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 19.2–6; Barnes, "CE", 26; Potter, 342.] It was not to be: Severus and Maximin were appointed, while Constantine and Maxentius were ignored. [Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 60–61; Odahl, 72–74; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 15.]

Some of the ancient sources detail plots that Galerius made on Constantine's life in the months following Diocletian's abdication. They assert that Galerius assigned Constantine to lead an advance unit in a cavalry charge through a swamp on the middle Danube, made him enter into single combat with a lion, and attempted to kill him in hunts and wars. Constantine always emerged victorious: the lion emerged from the contest in a poorer condition than Constantine; Constantine returned to Nicomedia from the Danube with a Sarmatian captive to drop at Galerius' feet. ["Origo" 4; Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 24.3–9; Praxagoras fr. 1.2; Aurelius Victor 40.2–3; "Epitome de Caesaribus" 41.2; Zosimus 2.8.3; Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 1.21; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 61; MacMullen, "Constantine", 32; Odahl, 73.] It is uncertain how much these tales can be trusted. [Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 61.]

In the West

Constantine recognized the implicit danger in remaining at Galerius' court, where he was held as a virtual hostage. His career depended on being rescued by his father in the west. Constantius was quick to intervene. [Odahl, 75–76.] In the late spring or early summer of 305, Constantius requested leave for his son, to help him campaign in Britain. After a long evening of drinking, Galerius granted the request. Constantine's later propaganda describes how Constantine fled the court in the night, before Galerius could change his mind. He rode from post-house to post-house at high speed, mutilating every horse in his wake. [Barnes, "CE", 27; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 39–40; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 61; MacMullen, "Constantine", 32; Odahl, 77; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 15–16; Potter, 344–5; Southern, 169–70, 341.] By the time Galerius awoke the following morning, Constantine had fled too far to be caught. [MacMullen, "Constantine", 32.] Constantine joined his father in Gaul, at Bononia (Boulogne) before the summer of 305. [Barnes, "CE", 27; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 39–40; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 61; Odahl, 77; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 15–16; Potter, 344–45; Southern, 169–70, 341.]

From Bononia they crossed the Channel to Britain and made their way to Eboracum (York), capital of the province of Britannia Secunda and home to a large military base. Constantine was able to spend a year in northern Britain at his father's side, campaigning against the Picts beyond Hadrian's Wall in the summer and autumn. [Barnes, "CE", 27, 298; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 39; Odahl, 77–78, 309; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 15–16.] Constantius' campaign, like that of Septimius Severus before it, probably advanced far into the north without achieving great success. [Mattingly, 233–34; Southern, 170, 341.] Constantius had become severely sick over the course of his reign, and died on 25 July 306 in Eboracum (York). Before dying, he declared his support for raising Constantine to the rank of full Augustus. The Alamannic king Chrocus, a barbarian taken into service under Constantius, then proclaimed Constantine as Augustus. The troops loyal to Constantius' memory followed him in acclamation. Gaul and Britain quickly accepted his rule;Barnes, "CE", 27–28; Jones, 59; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 61–62; Odahl, 78–79.] Iberia, which had been in his father's domain for less than a year, rejected it. [Jones, 59.]

Constantine sent Galerius an official notice of Constantius' death and his own acclamation. Along with the notice, he included a portrait of himself in the robes of an Augustus. [Barnes, "CE", 28–29; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 62; Odahl, 79–80.] The portrait was wreathed in bay. [Jones, 59; MacMullen, "Constantine", 39.] He requested recognition as heir to his father's throne, and passed off responsibility for his unlawful ascension on his army, claiming they had "forced it upon him". [Treadgold, 28.] Galerius was put into a fury by the message; he almost set the portrait on fire. His advisers calmed him, and argued that outright denial of Constantine's claims would mean certain war. [Barnes, "CE", 28–29; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 62; Odahl, 79–80; Rees, 160.] Galerius was compelled to compromise: He granted Constantine and the title "Caesar" rather than "Augustus" (The latter office went to Severus instead).Barnes, "CE", 29; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 41; Jones, 59; MacMullen, "Constantine", 39; Odahl, 79–80.] Wishing to make it clear that he alone gave Constantine legitimacy, Galerius personally sent Constantine the emperor's traditional purple robes. [Odahl, 79–80.] Constantine accepted the decision, knowing that it would remove doubts as to his legitimacy. [Barnes, "CE", 29.]

Early rule

Constantine's share of the Empire consisted of Britain, Gaul, and Spain. He therefore commanded one of the largest Roman armies, stationed along the important Rhine frontier. [Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 16–17.] After his promotion to emperor, Constantine remained in Britain, and secured his control in the northwestern dioceses. He completed the reconstruction of military bases begun under his father's rule, and ordered the repair of the region's roadways. [Odahl, 80–81.] He soon left for Augusta Treverorum (Trier) in Gaul, the Tetrarchic capital of the northwestern Roman Empire. [Odahl, 81.] The Franks, after learning of Constantine's acclamation, invaded Gaul across the lower Rhine over the winter of 306–7. [MacMullen, "Constantine", 39; Odahl, 81–82.] Constantine drove them back beyond the Rhine and captured two of their kings, Ascaric and Merogaisus. The kings and their soldiers were fed to the beasts of Trier's amphitheater in the "adventus" (arrival) celebrations that followed. [Barnes, "CE", 29; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 41; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 63; MacMullen, "Constantine", 39–40; Odahl, 81–83.]

Constantine began a major expansion of Trier. He strengthened the circuit wall around the city with military towers and fortified gates, and began building a palace complex in the northeastern part of the city. To the south of his palace, he ordered the construction of a large formal audience hall, and a massive imperial bathhouse. Constantine sponsored many building projects across Gaul during his tenure as Emperor of the West, especially in Augustodunum (Autun) and Arelate (Arles). [Odahl, 82–83. See also: William E. Gwatkin, Jr. [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/journals/CJ/29/1/Roman_Trier*.html Roman Trier] ." "The Classical Journal" 29 (1933): 3–12.] According to Lactantius, Constantine followed his father in following a tolerant policy towards Christianity. Although not yet a Christian, he probably judged it a more sensible policy than open persecution, [Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 24.9; Barnes, "Lactantius and Constantine", 43–46; Odahl, 85, 310–11.] and a way to distinguish himself from the "great persecutor" himself, Galerius. [Odahl, 86.] Constantine decreed a formal end to persecution, and returned to Christians all they had lost during the persecutions. [Barnes, "CE", 28.]

Because Constantine was still largely untried and had a hint of illegitimacy about him, he relied on his father's reputation in his early propaganda: the earliest panegyrics to Constantine give as much coverage to his father's deeds as to those of Constantine himself. [Rodgers, 236.] Constantine's military skill and building projects soon gave the panegyrist the opportunity to comment favorably on the similarities between father and son, and Eusebius remarked that Constantine was a "renewal, as it were, in his own person, of his father's life and reign". ["Panegyrici Latini" 7(6)3.4; Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 1.22, qtd. and tr. Odahl, 83; Rodgers, 238.] Constantinian coinage, sculpture and oratory also shows a new tendency for disdain towards the "barbarians" beyond the frontiers. After Constantine's victory over the Alemanni, he minted a coin issue depicting weeping and begging Alemannic tribesmen—"The Alemanni conquered"—beneath the phrase "Romans' rejoicing". [MacMullen, "Constantine", 40.] There was little sympathy for these enemies. As his panegyrist declared: "It is a stupid clemency that spares the conquered foe." [Qtd. in MacMullen, "Constantine", 40.]

Maxentius' rebellion

Following Galerius' recognition of Constantine as emperor, Constantine's portrait was brought to Rome, as was customary. Maxentius mocked the portrait's subject as the son of a harlot, and lamented his own powerlessness. [Zosimus, 2.9.2; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 62; MacMullen, "Constantine", 39.] Maxentius, jealous of Constantine's authority, [Barnes, "CE", 29; Odahl, 86; Potter, 346.] seized the title of emperor on 28 October 306. Galerius refused to recognize him, but failed to unseat him. Galerius sent Severus against Maxentius, but during the campaign, Severus' armies, previously under command of Maxentius's father Maximian, defected, and Severus was seized and imprisoned. [Barnes, "CE", 30–31; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 41–42; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 62–63; Odahl, 86–87; Potter, 348–49.] Maximian, brought out of retirement by his son's rebellion, left for Gaul to confer with Constantine in late 307. He offered to marry his daughter Fausta to Constantine, and elevate him to Augustan rank. In return, Constantine would reaffirm the old family alliance between Maximian and Constantius, and offer support to Maxentius' cause in Italy. Constantine accepted, and married Fausta in Trier in late summer 307. Constantine now gave Maxentius his meager support, offering Maxentius political recognition. [Barnes, "CE", 31; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 64; Odahl, 87–88; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 15–16.]

Constantine remained aloof from the Italian conflict, however. Over the spring and summer of 307, he had left Gaul for Britain to avoid any involvement in the Italian turmoil; [Barnes, "CE", 30; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 62–63; Odahl, 86–87.] now, instead of giving Maxentius military aid, he sent his troops against Germanic tribes along the Rhine. In 308, he raided the territory of the Bructeri, and made a bridge across the Rhine at Colonia Agrippinensium (Cologne). In 310, he marched to the northern Rhine and fought the Franks. When not campaigning, he toured his lands advertising his benevolence, and supporting the economy and the arts. His refusal to participate in the war increased his popularity among his people, and strengthened his power base in the West. [Barnes, "CE", 34; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 63–65; Odahl, 89; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 15–16.] Maximian returned to Rome in the winter of 307–8, but soon fell out with his son. In early 309, after a failed attempt to usurp Maxentius' title, Maximian returned to Constantine's court. [Barnes, "CE", 32; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 64; Odahl, 89, 93.]

On 11 November 308, Galerius called a general council at the military city of Carnuntum (Petronell-Carnuntum, Austria) to resolve the instability in the western provinces. In attendance were Diocletian, briefly returned from retirement, Galerius, and Maximian. Maximian was forced to abdicate again and Constantine was again demoted to Caesar. Licinius, one of Galerius' old military companions, was appointed Augustus of the west. The new system did not last long: Constantine refused to accept the demotion, and continued to style himself as Augustus on his coinage, even as other members of the Tetrarchy referred to him as a Caesar on theirs. Maximin was frustrated that he had been turned over for promotion while the newcomer Licinius had been raised to the office of Augustus, and demanded that Galerius promote him. Galerius offered to call both Maximin and Constantine "sons of the Augusti", [Barnes, "CE", 32–34; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 42–43; Jones, 61; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 65; Odahl, 90–91; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 17; Potter, 349–50; Treadgold, 29.] but neither accepted the new title. By the spring of 310, Galerius was referring to both men as Augusti. [Barnes, "CE", 33; Jones, 61.]

Maximian's rebellion

In 310, a dispossessed and power-hungry Maximian rebelled against Constantine while Constantine was away campaigning against the Franks. Maximian had been sent south to Arles with a contingent of Constantine's army, in preparation for any attacks by Maxentius in southern Gaul. He announced that Constantine was dead, and took up the imperial purple. In spite of a large donative pledge to any who would support him as emperor, most of Constantine's army remained loyal to their emperor, and Maximian was soon compelled to leave. Constantine soon heard of the rebellion, abandoned his campaign against the Franks, and marched his army up the Rhine.Barnes, "CE", 34–35; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 43; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 65–66; Odahl, 93; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 17; Potter, 352.] At Cabillunum (Chalon-sur-Saône), he moved his troops onto waiting boats to row down the slow waters of the Saône to the quicker waters of the Rhone. He disembarked at Lugdunum (Lyon). [Barnes, "CE", 34.] Maximian fled to Massilia (Marseille), a town better able to withstand a long siege than Arles. It made little difference, however, as loyal citizens opened the rear gates to Constantine. Maximian was captured and reproved for his crimes. Constantine granted some clemency, but strongly encouraged his suicide. In July 310, Maximian hanged himself.

In spite of the earlier rupture in their relations, Maxentius was eager to present himself as his father's devoted son after his death. [Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 43; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 68; Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 20.] He began printing coins with his father's deified image, proclaiming his desire to avenge Maximian's death. [Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 45; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 68.] Constantine initially presented the suicide as an unfortunate family tragedy. By 311, however, he was spreading another version. According to this, after Constantine had pardoned him, Maximian planned to murder Constantine in his sleep. Fausta learned of the plot and warned Constantine, who put a eunuch in his own place in bed. Maximian was apprehended when he killed the eunuch and was offered suicide, which he accepted. [Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 30.1; Barnes, "CE", 40–41, 305.] In addition to the propaganda, Constantine instituted a "damnatio memoriae" on Maximian, destroying all inscriptions referring to him and eliminating any public work bearing his image. [Barnes, "CE", 41; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 68.]

The death of Maximian necessitated a shift in Constantine's public image. He could no longer rely on his connection to the elder emperor Maximian, and needed a new source of legitimacy. [Potter, 352.] In a speech delivered in Gaul on 25 July 310, the orator reveals a previously unknown dynastic connection to Claudius II, a third-century emperor famed for defeating the Goths and restoring order to the empire. Breaking away from tetrarchic models, the speech emphasizes Constantine's ancestral prerogative to rule, rather than principles of imperial equality. The new ideology expressed in the speech made Galerius and Maximian irrelevant to Constantine's right to rule. ["Panegyrici Latini" 6(7); Barnes, "CE", 35–37, 301; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 66; Odahl, 94–95, 314–15; Potter, 352–53.] Indeed, the orator emphasizes ancestry to the exclusion of all other factors: "No chance agreement of men, nor some unexpected consequence of favor, made you emperor," the orator declares to Constantine. ["Panegyrici Latini" 6(7)1. Qtd. in Potter, 353.]

The oration also moves away from the religious ideology of the Tetrarchy, with its focus on twin dynasties of Jupiter and Hercules. Instead, the orator proclaims that Constantine experienced a divine vision of Apollo and Victory granting him laurel wreaths of health and a long reign. In the likeness of Apollo Constantine recognized himself as the saving figure to whom would be granted "rule of the whole world", ["Panegyrici Latini" 6(7).21.5.] as the poet Virgil had once foretold. [Virgil, "Ecologues" 4.10.] The oration's religious shift is paralleled by a similar shift in Constantine's coinage. In his early reign, the coinage of Constantine advertised Mars as his patron. From 310 on, Mars was replaced by Sol Invictus, a god conventionally identified with Apollo. [Barnes, "CE", 36–37; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 67; Odahl, 95.] There is little reason to believe that either the dynastic connection or the divine vision are anything other than fiction, but their proclamation strengthened Constantine's claims to legitimacy and increased his popularity among the citizens of Gaul. [Barnes, "CE", 36–37; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 50–53; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 66–67; Odahl, 94–95.]

Civil wars

War against Maxentius

By the middle of 310 Galerius had become too ill to involve himself in imperial politics. [Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 31–35; Eusebius, "Historia Ecclesiastica" 8.16; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 43; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 68; Odahl, 95–96, 316.] As his last political act, Galerius decided to rescind his failed policies of persecution. In a letter to his provincials posted in Nicomedia on 30 April 311, Galerius proclaimed an end to the persecutions, and a resumption of official religious toleration. [Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 34; Eusebius, "Historia Ecclesiastica" 8.17; Barnes, "CE", 304; Jones, 66.] He died soon after. [Barnes, "CE", 39; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 43–44; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 68; Odahl, 95–96.] Galerius' death destabilized what remained of the tetrarchic system. [Barnes, "CE", 41; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 45; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 69; Odahl, 96.] Maximinus mobilized against Licinius, and seized Asia Minor. Licinius and Maximinus arranged a temporary peace on the Bosphorus soon thereafter. [Barnes, "CE", 39–40; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 44; Odahl, 96.] While Constantine toured Britain and Gaul, Maxentius prepared for war. [Odahl, 96.] He fortified northern Italy, and strengthened his support in the Christian community by allowing it to elect a new Bishop of Rome, Eusebius. [Barnes, "CE", 38; Odahl, 96.]

Maxentius' rule was nevertheless insecure. His early support dissolved in the wake of heightened tax rates and depressed trade; riots broke out in Rome and Carthage; [Barnes, "CE", 37; Curran, 66; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 68; MacMullen, "Constantine", 62.] and Domitius Alexander was able to briefly usurp his authority in Africa.Barnes, "CE", 37.] By 312, he was a man barely tolerated, not one actively supported, [Barnes, "CE", 37–39.] even among Christian Italians. [Barnes, "CE", 38–39; MacMullen, "Constantine", 62.] In the summer of 311, Maxentius mobilized against Constantine while Licinius was occupied with affairs in the East. He declared war on Constantine, vowing to avenge his father's "murder". [Barnes, "CE", 40; Curran, 66.] To prevent Maxentius from forming an alliance against him with Licinius, [Barnes, "CE", 41.] Constantine forged his own alliance with Licinius over the winter of 311–12, and offered him his sister Constantia in marriage. Maximin considered Constantine's arrangement with Licinius an affront to his authority. In response, he sent ambassadors to Rome, offering political recognition to Maxentius in exchange for a military support. Maxentius accepted. [Barnes, "CE", 41; Elliott, "Christianity of Constantine", 44–45; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 69; Odahl, 96.] According to Eusebius, inter-regional travel became impossible, and there was military buildup everywhere. There was "not a place where people were not expecting the onset of hostilities every day". [Eusebius, "Historia Ecclesiastica" 8.15.1–2, qtd. and tr. in MacMullen, "Constantine", 65.]

Constantine's advisers and generals cautioned against preemptive attack on Maxentius; [Barnes, "CE", 41; MacMullen, "Constantine", 71.] even his soothsayers recommended against it, stating that the sacrifices had produced unfavorable omens. ["Panegyrici Latini" 12(9)2.5; Curran, 67.] Constantine, with a spirit that left a deep impression on his followers, inspiring some to believe that he had some form of supernatural guidance, [Curran, 67.] ignored all these cautions. [MacMullen, "Constantine", 70–71.] Early in the spring of 312,Barnes, "CE", 41; Odahl, 101.] Constantine crossed the Cottian Alps with a quarter of his army, a force numbering about 40,000. ["Panegyrici Latini" 12(9)5.1–3; Barnes, "CE", 41; MacMullen, "Constantine", 71; Odahl, 101.] The first town his army encountered was Segusium (Susa, Italy), a heavily fortified town that shut its gates to him. Constantine ordered his men to set fire to its gates and scale its walls. He took the town quickly. Constantine ordered his troops not to loot the town, and advanced with them into northern Italy.

At the approach to the west of the important city of Augusta Taurinorum (Turin, Italy), Constantine encountered a large force of heavily armed Maxentian cavalry. [Barnes, "CE", 41; Jones, 70; MacMullen, "Constantine", 71; Odahl, 101–2.] In the ensuing battle Constantine's army encircled Maxentius' cavalry, flanked them with his own cavalry, and dismounted them with blows from his soldiers' iron-tipped clubs. Constantine's armies emerged victorious. ["Panegyrici Latini" 12(9)5–6; 4(10)21–24; Jones, 70–71; MacMullen, "Constantine", 71; Odahl, 102, 317–18.] Turin refused to give refuge to Maxentius' retreating forces, opening its gates to Constantine instead. [Barnes, "CE", 41; Jones, 71; Odahl, 102.] Other cities of the north Italian plain sent Constantine embassies of congratulation for his victory. He moved on to Milan, where he was met with open gates and jubilant rejoicing. Constantine rested his army in Milan until mid-summer 312, when he moved on to Brixia (Brescia). [Barnes, "CE", 41–42; Odahl, 103.]

Brescia's army was easily dispersed, [Barnes, "CE", 42; Jones, 71; MacMullen, "Constantine", 71; Odahl, 103.] and Constantine quickly advanced to Verona, where a large Maxentian force was camped. [Jones, 71; MacMullen, "Constantine", 71; Odahl, 103.] Ruricius Pompeianus, general of the Veronese forces and Maxentius' praetorian prefect, [Jones, 71; Odahl, 103.] was in a strong defensive position, since the town was surrounded on three sides by the Adige. Constantine sent a small force north of the town in an attempt to cross the river unnoticed. Ruricius sent a large detachment to counter Constantine's expeditionary force, but was defeated. Constantine's forces successfully surrounded the town and laid siege. [Barnes, "CE", 42; Jones, 71; Odahl, 103.] Ruricius gave Constantine the slip and returned with a larger force to oppose Constantine. Constantine refused to let up on the siege, and sent only a small force to oppose him. In the desperately-fought encounter that followed, Ruricius was killed and his army destroyed. [Barnes, "CE", 42; Jones, 71; Odahl, 103–4.] Verona surrendered soon afterwards, followed by Aquileia, [Barnes, "CE", 42; Jones, 71; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 69; MacMullen, "Constantine", 71; Odahl, 104.] Mutina (Modena), [Jones, 71; MacMullen, "Constantine", 71.] and Ravenna. [MacMullen, "Constantine", 71.] The road to Rome was now wide open to Constantine. [Barnes, "CE", 42; Curran, 67; Jones, 71.]

Maxentius prepared for the same type of war he had waged against Severus and Galerius: he sat in Rome and prepared for a siege. [Barnes, "CE", 42; Jones, 71; Odahl, 105.] He still controlled Rome's praetorian guards, was well-stocked with African grain, and was surrounded on all sides by the seemingly-impregnable Aurelian Walls. He ordered all bridges across the Tiber cut, reportedly on the counsel of the gods, [Jones, 71.] and left the rest of central Italy undefended; Constantine secured that region's support without challenge. [Odahl, 104.] Constantine progressed slowlyBarnes, "CE", 42.] along the "Via Flaminia", [MacMullen, "Constantine", 72; Odahl, 107.] allowing the weakness of Maxentius to draw his regime further into turmoil. Maxentius' support continued to weaken: at chariot races on 27 October, the crowd openly taunted Maxentius, shouting that Constantine was invincible. [Barnes, "CE", 42; Curran, 67; Jones, 71–72; Odahl, 107–8.] Maxentius, no longer certain that he would emerge from a siege victorious, built a temporary boat bridge across the Tiber in preparation for a field battle against Constantine. [Barnes, "CE", 42–43; MacMullen, "Constantine", 78; Odahl, 108.] On 28 October 312, the sixth anniversary of his reign, he approached the keepers of the Sibylline Books for guidance. The keepers found in them a prophecy stating that, on that very day, "the enemy of the Romans" would die. Maxentius advanced north to meet Constantine in battle. [Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 44.8; Barnes, "CE", 43; Curran, 67; Jones, 72; Odahl, 108.]

Maxentius organized his forces—still twice the size of Constantine's—in long lines facing the battle plain, with their backs to the river.Odahl, 108.] When Constantine's army made its appearance, some of its soldiers bore unusual markings on their shields: instead of the traditional pagan standards, a new sign, the "labarum", was mounted. [Barnes, "CE", 43; Digeser, 122; Jones, 72; Odahl, 106.] According to Lactantius, Constantine was visited by a dream the night before the battle, wherein he was advised "to mark the heavenly sign of God on the shields of his soldiers...by means of a slanted letter X with the top of its head bent round, he marked Christ on their shields." [Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 44.4–6, tr. J.L. Creed, "Lactantius: De Mortibus Persecutorum" (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), qtd. in Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 71.] Eusebius describes another version, where, while marching at midday, "he saw with his own eyes in the heavens a trophy of the cross arising from the light of the sun, carrying the message, Conquer By This". [Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 1.28, tr. Odahl, 105. Barnes, "CE", 43; Drake, "Impact of Constantine on Christianity" (CC), 113; Odahl, 105.] During the following night, in a dream, Christ appeared with the heavenly sign and told him to make standards for his army in that form. [Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 1.27–29; Barnes, "CE", 43, 306; Odahl, 105–6, 319–20.] Although Eusebius is vague about when and where this event took place, [Drake, "Impact of Constantine on Christianity" (CC), 113.] it enters his narrative before the war against Maxentius begins. [Cameron and Hall, 208.] Eusebius describes the sign as Chi (Χ) traversed by Rho (Ρ), or ☧. [Barnes, "CE", 306; MacMullen, "Constantine", 73; Odahl, 319.] The Eusebian description of the vision has been explained as an example of the meteorological phenomenon known as the "solar halo", which can produce similar effects. [Barnes, "CE", 306; Cameron and Hall, 206–7; Drake, "Impact of Constantine on Christianity" (CC), 114; Nicholson, 311.]

Constantine deployed his own forces along the whole length of Maxentius' line. He ordered his cavalry to charge, and they broke Maxentius' cavalry. He then sent his infantry against Maxentius' infantry, pushing many into the Tiber where they were slaughtered and drowned. The battle was brief: [Barnes, "CE", 43; Curran, 68.] Maxentius' troops were broken before the first charge. [MacMullen, "Constantine", 78.] Maxentius' horse guards and praetorians initially held their position, but broke under the force of a Constantinian cavalry charge; they also broke ranks and fled to the river. Maxentius rode with them, and attempted to cross the bridge of boats, but he was pushed by the mass of his fleeing soldiers into the Tiber, and drowned. [Barnes, "CE", 43; Curran, 68; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 70; MacMullen, "Constantine", 78; Odahl, 108.]

Constantine entered Rome on 29 October. [Barnes, "CE", 44; MacMullen, "Constantine", 81; Odahl, 108.] He staged a grand "adventus" in the city, and was met with popular jubilation. [Cameron, 93; Curran, 71–74; Odahl, 110.] Maxentius' body was fished out of the Tiber and decapitated. His head was paraded through the streets for all to see. [Barnes, "CE", 44; Curran, 72; Jones, 72; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 70; MacMullen, "Constantine", 78; Odahl, 108.] After the ceremonies, Maxentius' disembodied head was sent to Carthage, after which Africa gave no further resistance. [Barnes, "CE", 44–45.] He entered as a Christian: unlike his predecessors, he neglected to make the trip to the Capitoline Hill and perform customary sacrifices at the Temple of Jupiter. [Barnes, "CE", 44; MacMullen, "Constantine", 81; Odahl, 111. Cf. also Curran, 72–75.] He did, however, choose to honor the Senatorial Curia with a visit, [Barnes, "CE", 45; Curran, 72; MacMullen, "Constantine", 81; Odahl, 109.] where he promised to restore its ancestral privileges and give it a secure role in his reformed government: there would be no revenge against Maxentius' supporters. [Barnes, "CE", 45–46; Odahl, 109.] In response, the Senate decreed him "title of the first name", which meant his name would be listed first in all official documents, [Barnes, "CE", 46; Odahl, 109.] and acclaimed him as "the greatest Augustus". [Barnes, "CE", 46.] He issued decrees returning property lost under Maxentius, recalling political exiles, and releasing Maxentius' imprisoned opponents. [Barnes, "CE", 44.]

In an extensive propaganda campaign followed, Maxentius' image was systematically purged from all public places. Maxentius was written up as a "tyrant", and set against an idealized image of the "liberator", Constantine. Eusebius, in his later works, is the best representative of this strand of Constantinian propaganda. [Barnes, "CE", 45–47; Cameron, 93; Curran, 76–77; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 70.] Constantine also attempted to remove Maxentius' influence on Rome's urban landscape. All structures built by Maxentius were re-dedicated to Constantine, including the Temple of Romulus and the Basilica of Maxentius. [Curran, 80–83.] Where he did not overwrite Maxentius' achievements, he upstaged them: the Circus Maximus was redeveloped so that its total seating capacity was twenty-five times larger than that of Maxentius' racing complex on the Via Appia. [Curran, 83–85.] Maxentius' strongest supporters in the military were neutralized when the Praetorian Guard and Imperial Horse Guard ("equites singulares") were disbanded. [Barnes, "CE", 45; Curran, 76; Odahl, 109.] Their tombstones were ground up and put to use in a basilica on the Via Labicana. [Curran, 101.] Early in Constantine's reign, the former base of the Imperial Horse Guard was chosen for redevelopment into the Lateran Basilica. Art historian Richard Krautheimer dated the event to 9 November 312, barely two weeks after Constantine captured the city. [Krautheimer, "Corpus Basilicarum Christianarum Romanorum", 5.90, cited in Curran, 93–96.] The Legio II Parthica was removed from Alba (Albano Laziale), [Barnes, "CE", 45.] and the remainder of Maxentius' armies were sent to do frontier duty on the Rhine. [Odahl, 109.]

Wars against Licinius

In the following years, Constantine gradually consolidated his military superiority over his rivals in the crumbling Tetrarchy. In 313, he met Licinius in Milan to secure their alliance by the marriage of Licinius and Constantine's half-sister Constantia. During this meeting, the emperors agreed on the so-called Edict of Milan (which, in its surviving forms, was neither an edict nor issued in Milan), officially granting full tolerance to all religions in the Empire. [Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 24.] The document had special benefits for Christians, legalizing their religion and granting them restoration for all property seized during Diocletian's persecution. It repudiates past methods of religious coercion, accepting religious plurality and using only general terms—"Divinity" and "Supreme Divinity", "summa divinitas"—avoiding any exclusive specificity. [Drake, "Impact," 121–3.] The conference was cut short, however, when news reached Licinius that his rival Maximinus Daia had crossed the Bosporus and invaded Licinian territory. Licinius departed and eventually defeated Maximinus, gaining control over the entire eastern half of the Roman Empire. Relations between the two remaining emperors deteriorated, though, and either in 314 or 316, Constantine and Licinius fought against one another in the war of Cibalae, with Constantine being victorious. They clashed again in the Battle of Campus Ardiensis in 317, and agreed to a settlement in which Constantine's sons Crispus and Constantine II, and Licinius' son Licinianus were made "caesars". [Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 38–39.]

In the year 320, Licinius reneged on the religious freedom promised by the Edict of Milan in 313 and began another persecution of the Christians. [Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 41–42.] It became a challenge to Constantine in the west, climaxing in the great civil war of 324. Licinius, aided by Goth mercenaries, represented the past and the ancient Pagan faiths. Constantine and his Franks marched under the Christian standard of the "labarum", and both sides saw the battle in religious terms. Supposedly outnumbered, but fired by their zeal, Constantine's army emerged victorious in the Battle of Adrianople. Licinius fled across the Bosphorus and appointed Martius Martinianus, the commander of his bodyguard, as Caesar, but Constantine next won the Battle of the Hellespont, and finally the Battle of Chrysopolis on 18 September 324. [Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 42–43.] Licinius and Martinianus surrendered to Constantine at Nicomedia on the promise their lives would be spared: they were sent to live as private citizens in Thessalonica and Cappadocia respectively, but in 325 Constantine accused Licinius of plotting against him and had them both arrested and hanged; Licinius's son (the son of Constantine's half-sister) was also eradicated. [Scarre, "Chronicle of the Roman Emperors", 215.] Thus Constantine became the sole emperor of the Roman Empire.MacMullen, "Constantine".]

Later rule

Foundation of Constantinople

Licinius' defeat represented the passing of old Rome, and the beginning of the role of the Eastern Roman Empire as a center of learning, prosperity, and cultural preservation. Constantine rebuilt the city of Byzantium, which was renamed "Constantinopolis" ("Constantine's City" or Constantinople in English), and issued special commemorative coins in 330 to honour the event. He provided the "Second Rome" with a Senate and civic offices similar to those of Rome. The new city was protected by the alleged True Cross, the Rod of Moses and other holy relics, though a cameo now at the Hermitage Museum also represented Constantine crowned by the tyche of the new city. [ [http://www.hermitagerooms.com/exhibitions/Byzantium/sardonyx.asp Sardonyx cameo depicting constantine the great crowned by Constantinople, 4th century AD] at "The Road to Byzantium: Luxury Arts of Antiquity". "The Hermitage Rooms at Somerset House" (30 March 2006 – 3 September 2006)] The figures of old gods were either replaced or assimilated into a framework of Christian symbolism. Constantine built the new Church of the Holy Apostles on the site of a temple to Aphrodite. Generations later there was the story that a Divine vision led Constantine to this spot, and an angel no one else could see, led him on a circuit of the new walls. The capital would often be compared to the 'old' Rome as "Nova Roma Constantinopolitana", the "New Rome of Constantinople"). [According to the "Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum", vol. 164 (Stuttgart: A. Hiersemann, 2005), column 442, there is no evidence for the tradition that Constantine officially dubbed the city "New Rome" ("Nova Roma" or "Nea Rhome"). Commemorative coins that were issued during the 330s already refer to the city as "Constantinopolis" (Michael Grant, "The Climax of Rome" (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1968), 133). It is possible that the emperor called the city "Second Rome" ("Deutera Rhome") by official decree, as reported by the 5th century church historian Socrates of Constantinople.]

Religious policy

Constantine is perhaps best known for being the first Christian Roman Emperor. His reign was a turning point for the Christian Church. In 313 Constantine announced toleration of Christianity in the Edict of Milan, which removed penalties for professing Christianity (under which many had been martyred in previous persecutions of Christians) and returned confiscated Church property. Though a similar edict had been issued in 311 by Galerius, then senior emperor of the Tetrarchy, Galerius' edict granted Christians the right to practice their religion but did not restore any property to them. [ See Lactantius, "De Mortibus Persecutorum" 34–35.]

Scholars debate whether Constantine adopted his mother St. Helena's Christianity in his youth, or whether he adopted it gradually over the course of his life. [ R. Gerberding and J. H. Moran Cruz, "Medieval Worlds" (New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004) p. 55] Constantine was over 40 when he finally declared himself a Christian. [Peter Brown, "The Rise of Christendom" 2nd edition (Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2003) p. 61] Constantine however still maintained the title of "Pontifex Maximus", which emperors bore as heads of the pagan priesthood. Writing to Christians, Constantine made clear that he believed he owed his successes to the protection of the Christian High God alone. [Peter Brown, "The Rise of Christendom" 2nd edition (Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2003) p. 60] Throughout his rule, Constantine supported the Church financially, built various basilicas, granted privileges (e.g. exemption from certain taxes) to clergy, promoted Christians to high ranking offices, and returned property confiscated during the Great Persecution of Diocletian. [R. Gerberding and J. H. Moran Cruz, "Medieval Worlds" (New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004) pp. 55-56] His most famous building projects include the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and Old Saint Peter's Basilica. The reign of Constantine established a precedent for the position of the Christian Emperor in the Church; Constantine considered himself responsible to God for the spiritual health of his subjects, and thus he had a duty to maintain orthodoxy. [ Richards, Jeffrey. "The Popes and the Papacy in the Early Middle Ages 476-752" (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979) pp. 14-15] ["The Popes and the Papacy in the Early Middle Ages 476-752" (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979) q. 15] The emperor ensured that God was properly worshipped in his empire; what proper worship consisted of was for the Church to determine. [ Richards, Jeffrey. "The Popes and the Papacy in the Early Middle Ages 476-752" (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979) p. 16] In 316, Constantine acted as a judge in a North African dispute concerning the heresy of the Donatists. After making a decision against the Donatists, Constantine led an army of Christians against Christians. After 300 years of pacifism, this was the first intra-Christian persecution. More significantly, in 325 he summoned the Council of Nicaea, effectively the first Ecumenical Council (unless the Council of Jerusalem is so classified), to deal mostly with the heresy of Arianism. Constantine also enforced the prohibition of the First Council of Nicaea against celebrating Easter on the day before the Jewish Passover (14 "Nisan") (see Quartodecimanism and Easter controversy). [ [http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/25023.htm "Life of Constantine" Vol. III Ch. XVIII] by Eusebius; [http://ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf203.iv.viii.i.x.html The Epistle of the Emperor Constantine, concerning the matters transacted at the Council, addressed to those Bishops who were not present] ]

Constantine instituted several legislative measures which had an impact on Jews. They were forbidden to own Christian slaves or to circumcise their slaves. Conversion of Christians to Judaism was outlawed. Congregations for religious services were restricted, but Jews were allowed to enter Jerusalem on Tisha B'Av, the anniversary of the destruction of the Temple.

Executions of Crispus and Fausta

On some date between 15 May and 17 June 326, Constantine had his eldest son Crispus, by Minervina, seized and put to death by "cold poison" at Pola (Pula, Croatia). [Guthrie, 325–6.] In July, Constantine had his wife, the Empress Fausta, killed at the behest of his mother, Helena. Fausta was left to die in an over-heated bath. [Guthrie, 326; Woods, "Death of the Empress," 70–72.] Their names were wiped from the face of many inscriptions, references to their lives in the literary record were erased, and the memory of both was condemned. Eusebius, for example, edited praise of Crispus out of later copies of his "Historia Ecclesiastica", and his "Vita Constantini" contains no mention of Fausta or Crispus at all. [Guthrie, 326; Woods, "Death of the Empress," 72.] Few ancient sources are willing to discuss possible motives for the events; those few that do offer unconvincing rationales, are of later provenance, and are generally unreliable. At the time of the executions, it was commonly believed that the Empress Fausta was either in an illicit relationship with Crispus, or was spreading rumors to that effect. A popular myth arose, modified to allude to Hippolytus–Phaedra legend, with the suggestion that Constantine killed Crispus and Fausta for their immoralities.Guthrie, 326–27.] One source, the largely fictional "Passion of Artemius", probably penned in the eighth century by John of Damascus, makes the legendary connection explicit. ["Art. Pass" 45; Woods, "Death of the Empress," 71–72.] As an interpretation of the executions, the myth rests on only "the slimmest of evidence": sources that allude to the relationship between Crispus and Fausta are late and unreliable, and the modern suggestion that Constantine's "godly" edicts of 326 and the irregularities of Crispus are somehow connected rests on no evidence at all. An additional story goes that Fausta wanted to kill Crispus to ensure that her own children would receive the Imperial throne. Therefore she told Constantine that Crispus had attempted to rape her, and bribed several senators to collaborate the story. Constantine was obligated by Roman Law to execute his son, as these charges were as serious as treason in Roman times. Hence, Constantine reluctantly, and sadly, executed his son. Later, his mother Helena heard of what had taken place, and investigated the event. She discovered that Fausta had bribed the senators, and told Constantine. For her treason, Fausta was executed in the gentlest way known at the time; she was locked in a bath. (This process would make the criminal pass out far before they were dead, and as such would feel no pain). After this entire event Constantine was so depressed that he never returned to the western half of the empire in his lifetime. [Odahl, Charles "Constantine and the Christian Empire"]

ickness and death

Eusebius of Caesarea's account resumes following the abortive Persian campaign, with Constantine set about building a "martyrion" for the apostles in Constantinople, and, within it, a final resting-place for himself. [Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 4.58–60.] In the course of one Feast of Easter, Constantine fell seriously ill. [Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 4.61.] He left Constantinople for the hot baths near his mother's city of Helenopolis (Altinova), on the southern shores of the Gulf of İzmit. There, in a church his mother built in honor of Lucian the Apostle, he prayed, and there he realized that he was dying. Seeking purification, he became a catechumen, and attempted a return to Constantinople, making it only as far as a suburb of Nicomedia. [Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 4.62.] He summoned the bishops, and told them of his hope to be baptized in the River Jordan, where Christ was written to have been baptized. He requested the baptism right away, promising to live a more Christian life should he live through his illness. The bishops, Eusebius records, "performed the sacred ceremonies according to custom". [Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 4.62.4.] He chose the Arianizing bishop Eusebius of Nicomedia, bishop of the city where he lay dying, as his baptizer. [Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 75–76; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 82.] In postponing his baptism, he followed one custom at the time which postponed baptism until old age or death. [ Because he was so old, he could not be submerged in water to be baptised, and therefore, the rules of baptism were changed to what they are today, having water placed on the forehead alone. In this period infant baptism, though practiced (usually in circumstances of emergency) had not yet become a matter of routine in the west. Thomas M. Finn, "Early Christian Baptism and the Catechumenate: East and West Syria". Collegeville: The Liturgical Press/Michael Glazier (1992); Philip Rousseau, "Baptism". "Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Post Classical World". Eds. G.W. Bowersock, Peter Brown, and Oleg Grabar. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press (1999).] It was thought Constantine put off baptism as long as he did so as to be absolved from as much of his sin as possible. [Marilena Amerise, 'Il battesimo di Costantino il Grande."] Constantine died soon after at a suburban villa called Achyron, on the last day of the fifty-day festival of Pentecost directly following Easter, on 22 May 337. [Eusebius, "Vita Constantini" 4.64; Fowden, "Last Days of Constantine," 147; Lenski, "Reign of Constantine" (CC), 82.]

Although Constantine's death follows the conclusion of the Persian campaign in Eusebius's account, most other sources report his death as occurring in its middle. Emperor Julian, writing in the mid-350s, observes that the Sassanians escaped punishment for their ill-deeds, because Constantine died "in the middle of his preparations for war". [Julian, "Orations" 1.18.b.] Similar accounts are given in the "Origo Constantini", an anonymous document composed while Constantine was still living, and which has Constantine dying in Nicomedia; ["Origo Constantini" 35.] the "Historiae abbreviatae" of Sextus Aurelius Victor, written in 361, which has Constantine dying at an estate near Nicomedia called Achyrona while marching against the Persians; [Sextus Aurelius Victor, "Historiae abbreviatae" XLI.16.] and the "Breviarium" of Eutropius, a handbook compiled in 369 for the Emperor Valens, which has Constantine dying in a nameless state villa in Nicomedia. [Eutropius, "Breviarium" X.8.2.] From these and other accounts, some have concluded that Eusebius's "Vita" was edited to defend Constantine's reputation against what Eusebius saw as a less congenial version of the campaign. [Fowden, "Last Days of Constantine," 148–9.]

Following his death, his body was transferred to Constantinople and buried in the Church of the Holy Apostles there. [Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 75–76.] He was succeeded by his three sons born of Fausta, Constantine II, Constantius II and Constans. A number of relatives were killed by followers of Constantius. He also had two daughters, Constantina and Helena, wife of Emperor Julian. [Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 71, figure 9.]

Legacy

Although he earned his honorific of "The Great" ("Μέγας") from Christian historians long after he had died, he could have claimed the title on his military achievements and victories alone. In addition to reuniting the Empire under one emperor, Constantine won major victories over the Franks and Alamanni in 306–8, the Franks again in 313–14, the Visigoths in 332 and the Sarmatians in 334. In fact, by 336, Constantine had actually reoccupied most of the long-lost province of Dacia, which Aurelian had been forced to abandon in 271. At the time of his death, he was planning a great expedition to put an end to raids on the eastern provinces from the Persian Empire. [Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 72.]

The Byzantine Empire considered Constantine its founder and the Holy Roman Empire reckoned him among the venerable figures of its tradition. In the later Byzantine state, it had become a great honor for an emperor to be hailed as a "new Constantine". Ten Emperors, including the last emperor of Byzantium, carried the name. [Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 91.] At the court of Charlemagne, the selected use of monumental Constantinian forms lent expression to conception of Charlemagne as Constantine's successor and equal. Constantine acquired a mythic role as a warrior against "heathens". The motif of the Romanesque equestrian, the mounted figure in the posture of a triumphant Roman emperor, came to be used as a visual metaphor in statuary in praise of local benefactors. The name "Constantine" itself enjoyed renewed popularity in western France in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. [Seidel, 237–39.] Most Eastern Christian churches consider Constantine a saint (Άγιος Κωνσταντίνος, Saint Constantine).Pohlsander, "Emperor Constantine", 83–87.] In the Byzantine Church he was called "isapostolos" (Ισαπόστολος Κωνσταντίνος)—an equal of the Apostles. [Lieu, "Constantine in Legendary Literature" (CC), 305.]

During his life and those of his sons, Constantine's was presented as a paragon of virtue. Even pagans like Praxagoras of Athens and Libanius showered him with praise. When the last of his sons died in 361, his nephew Julian the Apostate wrote the satire "Symposium, or the Saturnalia". The work stigmatized Constantine as inferior to the great pagan emperors, given over to luxury and greed. [Barnes, "CE", 272–23.] Following Julian, Eunapius of Sardis began the tradition that blamed Constantine for weakening the Empire through his indulgence to the Christians. [Barnes, "CE", 273.] In medieval times, when the Roman Catholic Church was dominant, Catholic historians presented Constantine as an ideal ruler, the standard against which any king or emperor could be measured. [Barnes, "CE", 273; Odahl, 281.] The Renaissance rediscovery of anti-Constantinian sources prompted a re-evaluation of Constantine's career. The German humanist Johann Löwenklau, discoverer of Zosimus' writings, published a Latin translation thereof in 1576. He included a preface that argued for Zosimus' picture of Constantine was superior to that offered by Eusebius and the church historians, and damned Constantine as a tyrant. [Johannes Leunclavius, "Apologia pro Zosimo adversus Evagrii, Nicephori Callisti et aliorum acerbas criminationes" ("Defence of Zosimus against the Unjustified Charges of Evagrius, Nicephorus Callistus, and Others") (Basel, 1576), cited in Barnes, "CE", 273, and Odahl, 282.] Cardinal Caesar Baronius, a man of the Counter-Reformation, criticized Zosimus, favoring Eusebius' account of the Constantinian era. Baronius' "Life of Constantine" (1588) presents Constantine as the model of a Christian prince. [Caesar Baronius, "Annales Ecclesiastici" 3 (Antwerp, 1623), cited in Barnes, "CE", 274, and Odahl, 282.] Edward Gibbon, aiming to unite the two extremes of Constantinian scholarship, offered a portrait of Constantine built on the contrasted narratives of Eusebius and Zosimus. [Edward Gibbon, "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" 18, cited in Barnes, "CE", 274, and Odahl, 282. See also Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 6–7.]

Modern interpretations of Constantine's rule begin with Jacob Burckhardt's "The Age of Constantine the Great" (1853). Burckhardt's Constantine is a scheming secularist, a politician who manipulates all parties in a quest to secure his own power. [Jacob Burckhardt, "Die Zeit Constantins des Grossen" (Basel, 1853; revised edition, Leipzig, 1880), cited in Barnes, "CE", 274; Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 7.] Henri Grégoire, writing in the 1930s, followed Burckhardt's evaluation of Constantine. For Grégoire, Constantine only developed an interest in Christianity after witnessing its political usefulness. Grégoire became a strong of the authenticity of Eusebius' writings, and postulated a pseudo-Eusebius to assume responsibility for the vision and conversion narratives of Eusebius' "Vita Constantini". [Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 7.] Otto Seeck, in "Geschichte des Untergangs der antiken Welt" (1920–23), and André Piganiol, in "L'empereur Constantin" (1932), wrote against this historiographic tradition. Seeck presented Constantine as a sincere war hero, whose ambiguities were the product of his own simple inconsistency. [Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 7–8.] Piganiol's Constantine is a philosophical monotheist, a child of his era's religious syncretism. [Barnes, "CE", 274.] Related histories by A.H.M. Jones ("Constantine and the Conversion of Europe" (1949)) and Ramsay MacMullen ("Constantine" (1969)) gave portraits of a less visionary, and more impulsive, Constantine. [Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 8.]

These later accounts were more willing to present Constantine as a genuine convert to Christianity. Beginning with Norman H. Baynes' "Constantine the Great and the Christian Church" (1929) and reinforced by Andreas Alföldi's "The Conversion of Constantine and Pagan Rome" (1948), a historiographic tradition developed which presented Constantine as a committed Christian. T.D. Barnes' seminal "CE" (1981), represents the culmination of this trend. Barnes' Constantine experienced a radical conversion, which drove him on a personal crusade to convert his empire. [Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 8–9; Odahl, 283.] The trend reaches its zenith in T.G. Elliott's "The Christianity of Constantine the Great" (1996). Elliott portrays Constantine as a committed Christian from early childhood. [Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 10.]

Donation of Constantine

Latin Rite Catholics of the Middle Ages considered it inappropriate that Constantine was baptized only on his death-bed and by a bishop of questionable orthodoxy, viewing it as a snub to the authority of the Papacy. Hence, by the early fourth century, a legend had emerged that Pope Sylvester I (314–35) had cured the pagan Emperor from leprosy. According to this legend, Constantine was soon baptized, and began the construction of a church in the Lateran Palace. [Lieu, "Constantine in Legendary Literature" (CC), 298–301.] In the eighth century, most likely during the pontificate of Stephen II (752–7), a document called the Donation of Constantine first appeared, in which the freshly converted Constantine hands the temporal rule over "the city of Rome and all the provinces, districts, and cities of Italy and the Western regions" to Stephen and his successors. ["Constitutum Constantini" 17, qtd. in Lieu, "Constantine in Legendary Literature" (CC), 301–3.] In the High Middle Ages, this document was used and accepted as the basis for the Pope's temporal power, though it was denounced as a forgery by Emperor Otto III [Henry Charles Lea, "The 'Donation of Constantine'". "The English Historical Review" 10: 37 (1895), 86–7.] and lamented as the root of papal worldliness by the poet Dante Alighieri. The 15th century philologist Lorenzo Valla proved the document was indeed a forgery. [Fubini, 79–86; Lenski, "Introduction" (CC), 6.]

Geoffrey of Monmouth's "Historia"

Because of his fame and his being proclaimed Emperor on the territory of Great Britain, Constantine was later also considered a British King. In the 11th century, the Welsh writer Geoffrey of Monmouth published a fictional work called "Historia Regum Britanniae", in which he narrates the supposed history of the Britons and their kings from the Trojan War, King Arthur and the Anglo-Saxon conquest. In this work, Geoffrey claimed that Constantine's mother Helena was actually the daughter of King Cole, the mythical King of the Britons and eponymous founder of Colchester. A daughter for King Cole had not previously figured in the lore, at least not as it has survived in writing, and this pedigree is likely to reflect Geoffrey's desire to create a continuous line of regal descent. It was indecorous, Geoffrey considered, that a king might have less-than-noble ancestors. Geoffrey also said that Constantine was proclaimed King of the Britons at York, rather than Roman Emperor. [Geoffrey of Monmouth, "The History of the Kings of Britain", 132–33.]

Notes

Essays from "The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine" are marked with a "(CC)".

References

Primary sources

* Athanasius, "Apologia conta Arianos" ("Defence against the Arians") "ca". 349.
* Athanasius, "Epistola de Decretis Nicaenae Synodi" ("Letter on the Decrees of the Council of Nicaea") "ca". 352.
* Athanasius, "Historia Arianorum" ("History of the Arians") "ca". 357.
* Sextus Aurelius Victor, "Liber de Caesaribus" ("Book on the Caesars") "ca". 361.
* "Epitome de Caesaribus" ("Epitome on the Caesars") "ca". 395.
* Eunapius, "History from Dexippus" first edition "ca". 390, second edition "ca". 415.
* Eusebius of Caesarea, "Historia Ecclesiastica" ("Church History") first seven books "ca". 300, eighth and ninth book "ca". 313, tenth book "ca". 315, epilogue "ca". 325.
* Eusebius of Caesarea, "Oratio de Laudibus Constantini" ("Oration in Praise of Constantine") 336.
* Eusebius of Caesarea, "Vita Constantini" ("The Life of the Blessed Emperor Constantine") "ca". 336–39.
* Eutropius, "Breviarium ab Urbe Condita" ("Abbreviated History from the City's Founding") "ca". 369.
* Ruffus Festus, "Breviarium Festi" ("The Abbreviated History of Festus") "ca". 370.
* Jerome, "Chronicon" ("Chronicle") "ca". 380.
* Jordanes, "De origine actibusque Getarum" ("The Origin and Deeds of the Goths") "ca". 551.
* Lactantius, "Liber De Mortibus Persecutorum" ("Book on the Deaths of the Persecutors") "ca". 313–15.
* Libanius, "Oratio" ("Orations") "ca". 362–65.
* Optatus, "Libri VII de Schismate Donatistarum" ("Seven Books on the Schism of the Donatists") first edition "ca". 365–67, second edition "ca". 385.
* "Origo Constantini Imperiatoris" ("The Lineage of the Emperor Constantine") "ca". 340–90.
* Orosius, "Historiarum Adversum Paganos Libri VII" ("Seven Books of History Against the Pagans") "ca". 417.
* "XII Panegyrici Latini" ("Twelve Latin Panegyircs") relevant panegyrics dated 289, 291, 297, 298, 307, 310, 311, 313 and 321.
* Philostorgius, "Historia Ecclesiastica" ("Church History") "ca". 433.
* Praxagoras of Athens, "Historia" ("History of Constantine the Great") "ca". 337.
* Socrates of Constantinople (Socrates Scholasticus), "Historia Ecclesiastica" ("Church History") "ca". 443.
* Sozomen, "Historia Ecclesiastica" ("Church History") "ca". 445.
* Theodoret, "Historia Ecclesiastica" ("Church History") "ca". 448.
* "Codex Theodosianus" ("Theodosian Code") 439.
* Zosimus, "Historia Nova" ("New History") "ca". 500. [This list of primary sources is based principally on the summary in Odahl, 2–11 and further lists in Odahl, 372–76. See also Bruno Bleckmann, "Sources for the History of Constantine" (CC), "Sources for the History of Constantine," in "The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine", trans. Noel Lenski, ed. Noel Lenski (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 14–31; and Noel Lenski, ed. "The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine"(New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 411–17.]

econdary sources

* Alföldi, Andrew. "The Conversion of Constantine and Pagan Rome". Translated by Harold Mattingly. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1948.
* Arjava, Antii. "Women and Law in Late Antiquity". Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. ISBN 0-19-815233-7
* Armstrong, Gregory T. "Church and State Relations: The Changes Wrought by Constantine." "Journal of Bible and Religion" 32 (1964): 1–7.
* Armstrong, Gregory T. "Constantine's Churches: Symbol and Structure." "The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians" 33 (1974): 5–16.
* Barnes, Timothy D. "Lactantius and Constantine." "The Journal of Roman Studies" 63 (1973): 29–46.
* Barnes, Timothy D. "Constantine and Eusebius" ("CE" in citations). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981. ISBN 978-0674165311
* Barnes, Timothy D. "The New Empire of Diocletian and Constantine". Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982. ISBN 0783722214
* Barnes, Timothy D. "Constantine and the Christians of Persia." "The Journal of Roman Studies" 75 (1985): 126–136.
* Bowman, Alan K. "Diocletian and the First Tetrarchy." In "The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume XII: The Crisis of Empire", edited by Alan Bowman, Averil Cameron, and Peter Garnsey, 67–89. Cambridge University Press, 2005. ISBN 0-521-30199-8
* Cameron, Averil. "The Reign of Constantine, A.D. 306–337." In "The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume XII: The Crisis of Empire", edited by Alan Bowman, Averil Cameron, and Peter Garnsey, 90–109. Cambridge University Press, 2005. ISBN 0-521-30199-8
* Cameron, Averil and Stuart G. Hall. "Life of Constantine". Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999. Hardcover ISBN 0-19-814917-4 Paperback ISBN 0-19-814924-7
* Corcoran, Simon. "The Empire of the Tetrarchs: Imperial Pronouncements and Government, AD 284–324". Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. ISBN 019815304X
* Curran, John. "Pagan City and Christian Capital". Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000. Hardcover ISBN 0-19-815278-8 Paperback ISBN 0-19-925420-6
* Digeser, Elizabeth DePalma. "The Making of A Christian Empire: Lactantius and Rome". London: Cornell University Press, 2000. ISBN 0801435943
* Downey, Glanville. "Education in the Christian Roman Empire: Christian and Pagan Theories under Constantine and His Successors." "Speculum" 32 (1957): 48–61.
* Drake, H. A. "What Eusebius Knew: The Genesis of the "Vita Constantini"." "Classical Philology" 83 (1988): 20–38.
* Drake, H. A. "Constantine and Consensus." "Church History" 64 (1995): 1–15.
* Drake, H. A. "Lambs into Lions: Explaining Early Christian Intolerance." "Past & Present" 153 (1996): 3–36.
* Drake, H. A. "Constantine and the Bishops: The Politics of Intolerance". Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000. ISBN 0-8018-6218-3
* Elliott, T. G. "Constantine's Conversion: Do We Really Need It?" "Phoenix" 41 (1987): 420–438.
* Elliott, T. G. "Eusebian Frauds in the "Vita Constantini"." "Phoenix" 45 (1991): 162–171.
* Elliott, T. G. "The Christianity of Constantine the Great" . Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press, 1996. ISBN 0-940866-59-5
* Fowden, Garth. "Between Pagans and Christians." "The Journal of Roman Studies" 78 (1988): 173–182.
* Fowden, Garth. "The Last Days of Constantine: Oppositional Versions and Their Influence." "The Journal of Roman Studies" 84 (1994): 146–170.
* Fubini, Riccardo. "Humanism and Truth: Valla Writes against the Donation of Constantine." "Journal of the History of Ideas" 57:1 (1996): 79–86.
* Grant, Robert M. "Religion and Politics at the Council at Nicaea." "The Journal of Religion" 55 (1975): 1–12.
* Guthrie, Patrick. "The Execution of Crispus." "Phoenix" 20: 4 (1966): 325–331.
* Harries, Jill. "Law and Empire in Late Antiquity". Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Hardcover ISBN 0-521-41087-8 Paperback ISBN 0-521-42273-6
* Hartley, Elizabeth. "Constantine the Great: York's Roman Emperor". York: Lund Humphries, 2004. ISBN 978-0853319283.
* Heather, Peter J. "Foedera" and "Foederati" of the Fourth Century." In "From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms", edited by Thomas F.X. Noble, 292–308. New York: Routledge, 2006. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-32741-5 Paperback ISBN 0-415-32742-3
* Helgeland, John. "Christians and the Roman Army A.D. 173-337." "Church History" 43 (June 1974): 149–163.
* Jones, A.H.M. "Constantine and the Conversion of Europe". Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1978 [1948] .
* Jordan, David P. "Gibbon's "Age of Constantine" and the Fall of Rome" "History and Theory" 8:1 (1969), 71–96.
* Lenski, Noel, ed. "The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine". New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Hardcover ISBN 0-521-81838-9 Paperback ISBN 0-521-52157-2
* Lieu, Samuel N.C. and Dominic Montserrat. "From Constantine to Julian: Pagan and Byzantine Views; A Source History". New York: Routledge, 1996.
* Mackay, Christopher S. "Lactantius and the Succession to Diocletian." "Classical Philology" 94:2 (1999): 198–209.
* MacMullen, Ramsay. "Constantine". New York: Dial Press, 1969. ISBN 0709946856
* MacMullen, Ramsay. "Christianizing the Roman Empire A.D. 100–400". New Heaven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 1984. ISBN 978-0300036428
* MacMullen, Ramsay. "Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth to Eighth Centuries". New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997. ISBN 0-300-07148-5
* Mattingly, David. "An Imperial Possession: Britain in the Roman Empire". London: Penguin, 2007. ISBN 978-0-140-14822-0
* Nicholson, Oliver. "Constantine's Vision of the Cross." "Vigiliae Christianae" 54:3 (2000): 309–323.
* Odahl, Charles Matson. "Constantine and the Christian Empire". New York: Routledge, 2004. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-17485-6 Paperback ISBN 0-415-38655-1
* Pears, Edwin. "The Campaign against Paganism A.D. 324." "The English Historical Review" 24:93 (1909): 1–17.
* Pohlsander, Hans. "Crispus: Brilliant Career and Tragic End". "Historia" 33 (1984): 79–106.
* Pohlsander, Hans. "The Emperor Constantine". London & New York: Routledge, 2004a. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-31937-4 Paperback ISBN 0-415-31938-2
* Pohlsander, Hans. " [http://www.roman-emperors.org/conniei.htm Constantine I (306 - 337 A.D.)] ." "De Imperatoribus Romanis" (2004b). Accessed December 16, 2007.
* Potter, David S. "The Roman Empire at Bay: AD 180–395". New York: Routledge, 2005. Hardcover ISBN 0-415-10057-7 Paperback ISBN 0-415-10058-5
* Rees, Roger. "Layers of Loyalty in Latin Panegyric: AD 289–307". New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN 0-19-924918-0
* Rodgers, Barbara Saylor. "The Metamorphosis of Constantine." "The Classical Quarterly" 39 (1989): 233–246.
* Seidel, Lisa. "Constantine 'and' Charlemagne." "Gesta" 15 (1976): 237–239.
* Southern, Pat. "The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine". New York: Routledge, 2001. ISBN 0-415-23944-3
* Storch, Rudolph H. "The "Eusebian Constantine"." "Church History" 40 (1971): 1–15.
* Treadgold, Warren. "A History of the Byzantine State and Society". Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997. ISBN 0-8047-2630-2
* Warmington, Brian. "Some Constantinian References in Ammianus." In "The Late Roman World and its Historian: Interpreting Ammianus Marcellinus", edited by Jan Willem Drijvers and David Hunt, 166–177. London: Routledge, 1999. ISBN 0-415-20271-X
* Weiss, Peter. "The Vision of Constantine." Translated by A.R. Birley in "Journal of Roman Archaeology" 16 (2003): 237–59.
* Wiemer, Hans-Ulrich. "Libanius on Constantine." "The Classical Quarterly" 44 (1994): 511–524.
* Williams, Stephen. "Diocletian and the Roman Recovery". New York: Routledge, 1997. ISBN 0-415-91827-8
* Woods, David. "On the Death of the Empress Fausta." "Greece & Rome" 45 (1988): 70–86.
* Woods, David. "Where Did Constantine I Die?" "Journal of Theological Studies" 48:2 (1997): 531–535.
* Wright, David H. "The True Face of Constantine the Great." "Dumbarton Oaks Papers" 41 (1987): 493–507

ee also

*Colossus of Constantine
*Constantinian shift

External links

*Letters of Constantine: [http://www.seanmultimedia.com/Pie_Constantine_The_Great_Letters_1.html Book 1] , [http://www.seanmultimedia.com/Pie_Constantine_The_Great_Letters_2.html Book 2] , & [http://www.seanmultimedia.com/Pie_Constantine_The_Great_Letters_3.html Book 3]
* [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109633/Constantine-I Encyclopaedia Britannica, Constantine I]
* [http://www.anders.com/lectures/lars_brownworth/12_byzantine_rulers/ 12 Byzantine Rulers] by Lars Brownworth of Stony Brook School (grades 7-12). 40 minute audio lecture on Constantine.
* [http://88.1911encyclopedia.org/C/CO/CONSTANTINE_I_.htm Constantine I] in the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica
* [http://www.constantinethegreatcoins.com/ Constantine the Great] A site about Constantine the Great and his bronze coins emphasizing history using coins, with many resources including reverse types issued and reverse translations.
* [http://rg.ancients.info/constantine/ House of Constantine bronze coins] Illustrations and descriptions of coins of Constantine the Great and his relatives.
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/northyorkshire/i_love_ny/history/romans/ BBC North Yorkshire's site on Roman York, Yorkshire and Constantine the Great]
* This [http://www.fourthcentury.com/index.php/imperial-laws-chart-364 list of Roman laws of the fourth century] shows laws passed by Constantine I relating to Christianity.
* [http://www.publicchristianity.org/Videos/constantinechristendom.html Professor Edwin Judge discusses Constantine's legacy for a Centre for Public Christianity vodcast]
* [http://web.upmf-grenoble.fr/Haiti/Cours/Ak "The Roman Law Library" by Professor Yves Lassard and Alexandr Koptev]

Persondata
NAME= Constantine I
ALTERNATIVE NAMES= Constantinus, Flavius Valerius Aurelius;Constantine, Saint;Constantine the Great;
SHORT DESCRIPTION=Roman Emperor
DATE OF BIRTH=c. 27 February 272
PLACE OF BIRTH=Naissus
DATE OF DEATH=22 May 337
PLACE OF DEATH=