 Hermite polynomials

In mathematics, the Hermite polynomials are a classical orthogonal polynomial sequence that arise in probability, such as the Edgeworth series; in combinatorics, as an example of an Appell sequence, obeying the umbral calculus; in numerical analysis as Gaussian quadrature; and in physics, where they give rise to the eigenstates of the quantum harmonic oscillator. They are also used in systems theory in connection with nonlinear operations on Gaussian noise. They are named after Charles Hermite (1864)^{[1]} although they were studied earlier by Laplace (1810) and Chebyshev (1859).^{[2]}
Contents
Definition
There are two different standard ways of normalizing Hermite polynomials:
(the "probabilists' Hermite polynomials"), and
(the "physicists' Hermite polynomials"). These two definitions are not exactly equivalent; either is a rescaling of the other, to wit
These are Hermite polynomial sequences of different variances; see the material on variances below.
The notation He and H is that used in the standard references Tom H. Koornwinder, Roderick S. C. Wong, and Roelof Koekoek et al. (2010) and Abramowitz & Stegun. The polynomials He_{n} are sometimes denoted by H_{n}, especially in probability theory, because
is the probability density function for the normal distribution with expected value 0 and standard deviation 1.
The first eleven probabilists' Hermite polynomials are:
and the first eleven physicists' Hermite polynomials are:
Properties
H_{n} is a polynomial of degree n. The probabilists' version He has leading coefficient 1, while the physicists' version H has leading coefficient 2^{n}.
Orthogonality
H_{n}(x) and He_{n}(x) are nthdegree polynomials for n = 0, 1, 2, 3, .... These polynomials are orthogonal with respect to the weight function (measure)
 (He)
or
 (H)
i.e., we have
when m ≠ n. Furthermore,
 (probabilist)
or
 (physicist).
The probabilist polynomials are thus orthogonal with respect to the standard normal probability density function.
Completeness
The Hermite polynomials (probabilist or physicist) form an orthogonal basis of the Hilbert space of functions satisfying
in which the inner product is given by the integral including the Gaussian weight function w(x) defined in the preceding section,
An orthogonal basis for L^{2}(R, w(x) dx) is a complete orthogonal system. For an orthogonal system, completeness is equivalent to the fact that the 0 function is the only function ƒ ∈ L^{2}(R, w(x) dx) orthogonal to all functions in the system. Since the linear span of Hermite polynomials is the space of all polynomials, one has to show (in physicist case) that if ƒ satisfies
for every n ≥ 0, then ƒ = 0. One possible way to do it is to see that the entire function
vanishes identically. The fact that F(it) = 0 for every t real means that the Fourier transform of ƒ(x) exp(−x^{2}) is 0, hence ƒ is 0 almost everywhere. Variants of the above completeness proof apply to other weights with exponential decay. In the Hermite case, it is also possible to prove an explicit identity that implies completeness (see "Completeness relation" below).
An equivalent formulation of the fact that Hermite polynomials are an orthogonal basis for L^{2}(R, w(x) dx) consists in introducing Hermite functions (see below), and in saying that the Hermite functions are an orthonormal basis for L^{2}(R).
Hermite's differential equation
The probabilists' Hermite polynomials are solutions of the differential equation
where λ is a constant, with the boundary conditions that u should be polynomially bounded at infinity. With these boundary conditions, the equation has solutions only if λ is a nonnegative integer, and up to an overall scaling, the solution is uniquely given by u(x) = H_{λ}(x). Rewriting the differential equation as an eigenvalue problem
 L[u] = u'' − xu' = − λu
solutions are the eigenfunctions of the differential operator L. This eigenvalue problem is called the Hermite equation, although the term is also used for the closely related equation
 u'' − 2xu' = − 2λu
whose solutions are the physicists' Hermite polynomials.
With more general boundary conditions, the Hermite polynomials can be generalized to obtain more general analytic functions H_{λ}(z) for λ a complex index. An explicit formula can be given in terms of a contour integral (Courant & Hilbert 1953).
Recursion relation
The sequence of Hermite polynomials also satisfies the recursion
 (probabilist)
 (physicist)
The Hermite polynomials constitute an Appell sequence, i.e., they are a polynomial sequence satisfying the identity
 (probabilist)
 (physicist)
or equivalently,
 (probabilist)
 (physicist)
(the equivalence of these last two identities may not be obvious, but its proof is a routine exercise).
It follows that the Hermite polynomials also satisfy the recurrence relation
 (probabilist)
 (physicist)
These last relations, together with the initial polynomials H_{0}(x) and H_{1}(x), can be used in practice to compute the polynomials quickly.
Moreover, the following multiplication theorem holds:
Explicit expression
The physicists' Hermite polynomials can be written explicitly as
for even values of n and
for odd values of n. These two equations may be combined into one using the floor function:
The probabilists' Hermite polynomials He have similar formulas, which may be obtained from these by replacing the power of 2x with the corresponding power of (√2)x, and multiplying the entire sum by 2^{n/2}.
Generating function
The Hermite polynomials are given by the exponential generating function
 (probabilist)
 (physicist).
This equality is valid for all x, t complex, and can be obtained by writing the Taylor expansion at x of the entire function z → exp(−z^{2}) (in physicist's case). One can also derive the (physicist's) generating function by using Cauchy's Integral Formula to write the Hermite polynomials as
Using this in the sum , one can evaluate the remaining integral using the calculus of residues and arrive at the desired generating function.
Expected value
If X is a random variable with a normal distribution with standard deviation 1 and expected value μ then
 (probabilist)
Asymptotic expansion
Asymptotically, as n tends to infinity, the expansion
 (physicist^{[3]})
holds true. For certain cases concerning a wider range of evaluation, it is necessary to include a factor for changing amplitude
Which, using Stirling's approximation, can be further simplified, in the limit, to
This expansion is needed to resolve the wavefunction of a quantum harmonic oscillator such that it agrees with the classical approximation in the limit of the correspondence principle.
A finer approximation^{[4]}, which takes into account the uneven spacing of the zeros near the edges, makes use of the substitution , for , with which one has the uniform approximation
Similar approximations hold for the monotonic and transition regions. Specifically, if for then
while for with t complex and bounded then
where Ai(t) is the Airy function of the first kind.
Relations to other functions
Laguerre polynomials
The Hermite polynomials can be expressed as a special case of the Laguerre polynomials.
 (physicist)
 (physicist)
Relation to confluent hypergeometric functions
The Hermite polynomials can be expressed as a special case of the parabolic cylinder functions.
 (physicist)
where U(a,b;z) is Whittaker's confluent hypergeometric function. Similarly,
 (physicist)
 (physicist)
where is Kummer's confluent hypergeometric function.
Differential operator representation
The probabilists' Hermite polynomials satisfy the identity
where D represents differentiation with respect to x, and the exponential is interpreted by expanding it as a power series. There are no delicate questions of convergence of this series when it operates on polynomials, since all but finitely many terms vanish.
Since the power series coefficients of the exponential are well known, and higher order derivatives of the monomial x^{n} can be written down explicitly, this differential operator representation gives rise to a concrete formula for the coefficients of H_{n} that can be used to quickly compute these polynomials.
Since the formal expression for the Weierstrass transform W is e^{D2}, we see that the Weierstrass transform of (√2)^{n}He_{n}(x/√2) is x^{n}. Essentially the Weierstrass transform thus turns a series of Hermite polynomials into a corresponding Maclaurin series.
The existence of some formal power series g(D), with nonzero constant coefficient, such that He_{n}(x) = g(D)x^{n}, is another equivalent to the statement that these polynomials form an Appell sequence. Since they are an Appell sequence they are a fortiori a Sheffer sequence.
Contour integral representation
The Hermite polynomials have a representation in terms of a contour integral, as
 (probabilist)
 (physicist)
with the contour encircling the origin.
Generalizations
The (probabilists') Hermite polynomials defined above are orthogonal with respect to the standard normal probability distribution, whose density function is
which has expected value 0 and variance 1. One may speak of Hermite polynomials
of variance α, where α is any positive number. These are orthogonal with respect to the normal probability distribution whose density function is
They are given by
In particular, the physicists' Hermite polynomials are
If
then the polynomial sequence whose nth term is
is the umbral composition of the two polynomial sequences, and it can be shown to satisfy the identities
and
The last identity is expressed by saying that this parameterized family of polynomial sequences is a crosssequence.
"Negative variance"
Since polynomial sequences form a group under the operation of umbral composition, one may denote by
the sequence that is inverse to the one similarly denoted but without the minus sign, and thus speak of Hermite polynomials of negative variance. For α > 0, the coefficients of He_{n}^{[−α]}(x) are just the absolute values of the corresponding coefficients of He_{n}^{[α]}(x).
These arise as moments of normal probability distributions: The nth moment of the normal distribution with expected value μ and variance σ^{2} is
where X is a random variable with the specified normal distribution. A special case of the crosssequence identity then says that
Applications
Hermite functions
One can define the Hermite functions from the physicists' polynomials:
Since these functions contain the square root of the weight function, and have been scaled appropriately, they are orthonormal:
and form an orthonormal basis of L^{2}(R). This fact is equivalent to the corresponding statement for Hermite polynomials (see above).
The Hermite functions are closely related to the Whittaker function (Whittaker and Watson, 1962) :
and thereby to other parabolic cylinder functions. The Hermite functions satisfy the differential equation:
This equation is equivalent to the Schrödinger equation for a harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics, so these functions are the eigenfunctions.
Recursion relation
Following recursion relations of Hermite polynomials, the Hermite functions obey
Cramér's inequality
The Hermite functions satisfy the following bound due to Harald Cramér^{[5]}^{[6]}
for x real, where the constant K is less than 1.086435.
Hermite functions as eigenfunctions of the Fourier transform
The Hermite functions ψ_{n}(x) are a set of eigenfunctions of the continuous Fourier transform. To see this, take the physicist's version of the generating function and multiply by exp(−x^{ 2}/2). This gives
Choosing the unitary representation of the Fourier transform, the Fourier transform of the left hand side is given by
The Fourier transform of the right hand side is given by
Equating like powers of t in the transformed versions of the left and righthand sides gives
The Hermite functions ψ_{n}(x) are therefore an orthonormal basis of L^{2}(R) which diagonalizes the Fourier transform operator. In this case, we chose the unitary version of the Fourier transform, so the eigenvalues are (−i)^{ n}.
Combinatorial interpretation of coefficients
In the Hermite polynomial H_{n}(x) of variance 1, the absolute value of the coefficient of x^{k} is the number of (unordered) partitions of an nmember set into k singletons and (n − k)/2 (unordered) pairs.
Completeness relation
The Christoffel–Darboux formula for Hermite polynomials reads
Moreover, the following identity holds in the sense of distributions^{[7]}
where δ is the Dirac delta function, (ψ_{n}) the Hermite functions, and δ(x − y) represents the Lebesgue measure on the line y = x in R^{2}, normalized so that its projection on the horizontal axis is the usual Lebesgue measure. This distributional identity follows by letting u → 1 in Mehler's formula, valid when −1 < u < 1:
which is often stated equivalently as
The function (x, y) → E(x, y; u) is the density for a Gaussian measure on R^{2} which is, when u is close to 1, very concentrated around the line y = x, and very spread out on that line. It follows that
when ƒ, g are continuous and compactly supported. This yields that ƒ can be expressed from the Hermite functions, as sum of a series of vectors in L^{2}(R), namely
In order to prove the equality above for E(x, y; u), the Fourier transform of Gaussian functions will be used several times,
The Hermite polynomial is then represented as
With this representation for H_{n}(x) and H_{n}(y), one sees that
and this implies the desired result, using again the Fourier transform of Gaussian kernels after performing the substitution
See also
Notes
 ^ C. Hermite: Sur un nouveau développment en série de fonctions C. R Acad. Sci. Paris 58 1864 93100; Oeuvres II 293303
 ^ P.L.Chebyshev: Sur le développment des fonctions a une seule variable Bull. Acad. Sci. St. Petersb. I 1859 193200;Oeuvres I 501508
 ^ Abramowitz, p. 508510, 13.6.38 and 13.5.16
 ^ Szegő 1939, 1955, p. 201
 ^ Erdélyi et al. 1955, p. 207
 ^ Szegő 1939, 1955
 ^ Wiener 1958
References
 Abramowitz, Milton; Stegun, Irene A., eds. (1965), "Chapter 22", Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, New York: Dover, pp. 773, ISBN 9780486612720, MR0167642, http://www.math.sfu.ca/~cbm/aands/page_773.htm.
 Courant, Richard; Hilbert, David (1953), Methods of Mathematical Physics, Volume I, WileyInterscience.
 Erdélyi, Arthur; Magnus, Wilhelm; Oberhettinger, Fritz; Tricomi, Francesco G. (1955), Higher transcendental functions. Vol. II, McGrawHill (scan)
 Fedoryuk, M.V. (2001), "Hermite functions", in Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopaedia of Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 9781556080104, http://eom.springer.de/H/h046980.htm.
 Koornwinder, Tom H.; Wong, Roderick S. C.; Koekoek, Roelof; Swarttouw, René F. (2010), "Orthogonal Polynomials", in Olver, Frank W. J.; Lozier, Daniel M.; Boisvert, Ronald F. et al., NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780521192255, MR2723248, http://dlmf.nist.gov/18
 Laplace, P.S. (1810), Mém. Cl. Sci. Math. Phys. Inst. France 58: 279–347
 Suetin, P. K. (2001), "Hermite polynomials", in Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopaedia of Mathematics, Springer, ISBN 9781556080104, http://eom.springer.de/H/h047010.htm.
 Szegő, Gábor (1939, 1955), Orthogonal Polynomials, American Mathematical Society
 Wiener, Norbert (1958), The Fourier Integral and Certain of its Applications, New York: Dover Publications, ISBN 0486602729
 Whittaker, E. T.; Watson, G. N. (1962), 4th Edition, ed., A Course of Modern Analysis, London: Cambridge University Press
 Temme, Nico, Special Functions: An Introduction to the Classical Functions of Mathematical Physics, Wiley, New York, 1996
External links
Categories: Special hypergeometric functions
 Polynomials
 Orthogonal polynomials
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.