- Standard deviation
In

probability andstatistics , the**standard deviation**is a measure of the dispersion of a collection of values. It can apply to aprobability distribution , arandom variable , a population or adata set . The standard deviation is usually denoted with the letter "σ" (lowercase sigma). It is defined as the root-mean-square (RMS) deviation of the values from their mean, or as thesquare root of thevariance .Formulated byGalton in the late 1860s, [*[*] the standard deviation remains the most common measure of statistical dispersion, measuring how widely spread the values in a*http://www.sciencetimeline.net/1866.htm Sir Francis Galton discovered the standard deviation*]data set are. If many data points are close to the mean, then the standard deviation is small; if many data points are far from the mean, then the standard deviation is large. If all data values are equal, then the standard deviation is zero. A useful property of standard deviation is that, unlike variance, it is expressed in the same units as the data.When only a sample of data from a population is available, the population standard deviation can be estimated by a modified standard deviation of the sample, explained below.

**Definition and calculation****tandard deviation of a probability distribution or random variable**The standard deviation of a (univariate.) probability distribution is the same as that of a random variable having that distribution.

The standard deviation σ of a

real-valued random variable "X" is defined as::$egin\{array\}\{lcl\}sigma\; =\; sqrt\{operatorname\{E\}((X\; -\; operatorname\{E\}(X))^2)\}\; =\; sqrt\{operatorname\{E\}(X^2)\; -\; (operatorname\{E\}(X))^2\},,end\{array\}$

where E("X") is the

expected value of "X" (another word for the mean), often indicated with the Greek letter μ.Not all random variables have a standard deviation, since these expected values need not exist. For example, the standard deviation of a random variable which follows a

Cauchy distribution is undefined because its E("X") is undefined.**tandard deviation of a continuous random variable**Continuous distribution s usually give a formula for calculating the standard deviation as a function of the parameters of the distribution. In general, the standard deviation of a continuous real-valued random variable "X" withprobability density function "p"("x") is:$sigma\; =\; sqrt\{int\; (x-mu)^2\; ,\; p(x)\; ,\; dx\},,$where:$mu\; =\; int\; x\; ,\; p(x)\; ,\; dx,,$and where the integrals are

definite integral s taken for "x" ranging over the range of "X".**tandard deviation of a discrete random variable or data set**The standard deviation of a discrete random variable is the root-mean-square (RMS) deviation of its values from the

mean .If the random variable "X" takes on "N" values $extstyle\; x\_1,dots,x\_N$ (which are

real number s) with equal probability, then its standard deviation "σ" can be calculated as follows:

# Find the mean, $scriptstyleoverline\{x\}$, of the values.

# For each value $x\_i$ calculate its deviation ($scriptstyle\; x\_i\; -\; overline\{x\}$) from the mean.

# Calculate the squares of these deviations.

# Find the mean of the squared deviations. This quantity is thevariance "σ"^{2}.

# Take the square root of the variance.This calculation is described by the following formula::$sigma\; =\; sqrt\{frac\{1\}\{N-1\}\; sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; (x\_i\; -\; overline\{x\})^2\},,$

where $scriptstyle\; overline\{x\}$ is the

arithmetic mean of the values "x_{i}", defined as::$overline\{x\}\; =\; frac\{x\_1+x\_2+cdots+x\_N\}\{N\}\; =\; frac\{1\}\{N\}sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; x\_i,.$

If not all values have equal probability, but the probability of value "x

_{i}" equals "p_{i}", the standard deviation can be computed by::$sigma\; =\; sqrt\{frac\{sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; p\_i(x\_i\; -\; overline\{x\})^2\}\{sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; p\_i,,$and:$s\; =\; sqrt\{frac\{N\text{'}\; sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; p\_i(x\_i\; -\; overline\{x\})^2\}\{(N\text{'}-1)sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; p\_i,,$

where:$overline\{x\}\; =frac\{\; sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; p\_i\; x\_i\}\{sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; p\_i\},,$and N' is the number of non-zero weight elements.

The standard deviation of a data set is the same as that of a

discrete random variable that can assume precisely the values from the data set, where the point mass for each value is proportional to its multiplicity in the data set.**Example**Suppose we wished to find the standard deviation of the data set consisting of the values 3, 7, 7, and 19.

**Step 1:**find the arithmetic mean (average) of 3, 7, 7, and 19,:$(3+7+7+19)/4=9.$

**Step 2:**find the deviation of each number from the mean,: $3\; -\; 9\; =\; -6$: $7\; -\; 9\; =\; -2$: $7\; -\; 9\; =\; -2$: $19\; -\; 9\; =\; 10.$**Step 3:**square each of the deviations, which amplifies large deviations and makes negative values positive,: $(-6)^2=36$ : $(-2)^2=4$ : $(-2)^2=4$ : $10^2=100.$**Step 4:**find the mean of those squared deviations, : $(36+4+4+100)/4=36.$**Step 5:**take the non-negative square root of the quotient (converting squared units back to regular units),:$sqrt\{36\}\; =\; 6.$So, the standard deviation of the set is 6. This example also shows that, in general, the standard deviation is different from the

mean absolute deviation (which is 5 in this example).**implification of the formula**The calculation of the sum of squared deviations can be simplified as follows:

:$egin\{align\}sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; (x\_i\; -\; overline\{x\})^2\; =\; \{\}\; sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; (x\_i^2\; -\; 2\; x\_ioverline\{x\}\; +\; overline\{x\}^2)\; \backslash \; \{\}\; =\; left(sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; x\_i^2\; ight)\; -\; left(2\; overline\{x\}\; sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; x\_i\; ight)\; +\; Noverline\{x\}^2\; \backslash \; \{\}\; =\; left(sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; x\_i^2\; ight)\; -\; 2\; overline\{x\}\; (Noverline\{x\})\; +\; Noverline\{x\}^2\; \backslash \; \{\}\; =\; left(sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; x\_i^2\; ight)\; -\; 2Noverline\{x\}^2\; +\; Noverline\{x\}^2\; \backslash \; \{\}\; =\; left(sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; x\_i^2\; ight)\; -\; Noverline\{x\}^2.end\{align\}$

Applying this to the original formula for standard deviation gives:

:$egin\{align\}sigma\; =\; \{\}\; sqrt\{frac\{1\}\{N\}\; left(left(sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; x\_i^2\; ight)\; -\; Noverline\{x\}^2\; ight)\}\; \backslash \; \{\}\; =\; sqrt\{frac\{1\}\{N\}\; left(sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; x\_i^2\; ight)\; -\; overline\{x\}^2\}.end\{align\}$

**Estimating population standard deviation from sample standard deviation**In the real world, finding the standard deviation of an entire population is unrealistic except in certain cases, such as

standardized testing , where every member of a population is sampled. In most cases, the standard deviation is estimated by examining a random sample taken from the population. Using the definition given above for a data set and applying it to a small or moderately-sized sample results in an estimate that tends to be too low. The most common measure used is an adjusted version, the "sample standard deviation", which is defined by:$s\; =\; sqrt\{frac\{1\}\{N-1\}\; sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; (x\_i\; -\; overline\{x\})^2\},,$

where $scriptstyle\{x\_1,,x\_2,,ldots,,x\_N\}$ is the sample and $scriptstyleoverline\{x\}$ is the mean of the sample. The denominator "N" − 1 is the number of degrees of freedom in the vector$scriptstyle(x\_1-overline\{x\},,dots,,x\_N-overline\{x\})$.

The reason for this definition is that "s"

^{2}is anunbiased estimator for thevariance σ^{2}of the underlying population, if that variance exists and the sample values are drawn independently with replacement. However, "s" is "not" an unbiased estimator for the standard deviation σ; it tends to underestimate the population standard deviation. Although an unbiased estimator for σ is known when the random variable is normally distributed, the formula is complicated and amounts to a minor correction: seeUnbiased estimation of standard deviation . Moreover, unbiasedness, in this sense of the word, is not always desirable; seebias of an estimator .Another estimator sometimes used is the similar expression:$sqrt\{frac\{1\}\{N\}\; sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; (x\_i\; -\; overline\{x\})^2\},,.$This form has a uniformly smaller

mean squared error than does the unbiased estimator, and is the maximum-likelihood estimate when the population is normally distributed.**Properties of standard deviation**For constant "c" and random variables "X" and "Y":

: $operatorname\{stdev\}(X\; +\; c)\; =\; operatorname\{stdev\}(X)\; ,,$

: $operatorname\{stdev\}(cX)\; =\; |c|,operatorname\{stdev\}(X)\; ,,$

: $operatorname\{stdev\}(X\; +\; Y)\; =\; sqrt\{operatorname\{var\}(X)\; +\; operatorname\{var\}(Y)\; +\; 2operatorname\{cov\}(X,Y)\}\; ,,$where $operatorname\{var\}$ and $operatorname\{cov\}$ stand for

variance andcovariance , respectively.**Interpretation and application**A large standard deviation indicates that the data points are far from the mean and a small standard deviation indicates that they are clustered closely around the mean.

For example, each of the three data sets {0, 0, 14, 14}, {0, 6, 8, 14} and {6, 6, 8, 8} has a mean of 7. Their standard deviations are 7, 5, and 1, respectively. The third set has a much smaller standard deviation than the other two because its values are all close to 7. In a loose sense, the standard deviation tells us how far from the mean the data points tend to be. It will have the same units as the data points themselves. If, for instance, the data set {0, 6, 8, 14} represents the ages of four siblings in years, the standard deviation is 5 years.

As another example, the data set {1000, 1006, 1008, 1014} may represent the distances traveled by four athletes, measured in meters. It has a mean of 1007 meters, and a standard deviation of 5 meters.

Standard deviation may serve as a measure of uncertainty. In physical science for example, the reported standard deviation of a group of repeated

measurement s should give the precision of those measurements. When deciding whether measurements agree with a theoretical prediction, the standard deviation of those measurements is of crucial importance: if the mean of the measurements is too far away from the prediction (with the distance measured in standard deviations), then the theory being tested probably needs to be revised. This makes sense since they fall outside the range of values that could reasonably be expected to occur if the prediction were correct and the standard deviation appropriately quantified. Seeprediction interval .**Real-life examples**The practical value of understanding the standard deviation of a set of values is in appreciating how much variation there is from the "average" (mean).

**Weather**As a simple example, consider average temperatures for cities. While two cities may each have an average temperature of 15 °C, it's helpful to understand that the range for cities near the coast is smaller than for cities inland, which clarifies that, while the average is similar, the chance for variation is greater inland than near the coast.

So, an average of 15 occurs for one city with highs of 25 °C and lows of 5 °C, and also occurs for another city with highs of 18 and lows of 12. The standard deviation allows us to recognize that the average for the city with the wider variation, and thus a higher standard deviation, will not offer as reliable a prediction of temperature as the city with the smaller variation and lower standard deviation.

**ports**Another way of seeing it is to consider sports teams. In any set of categories, there will be teams that rate highly at some things and poorly at others. Chances are, the teams that lead in the standings will not show such disparity, but will perform well in most categories. The lower the standard deviation of their ratings in each category, the more balanced and consistent they will tend to be. Whereas, teams with a higher standard deviation will be more unpredictable. For example, a team that is consistently bad in most categories will have a low standard deviation. A team that is consistently good in most categories will also have a low standard deviation. However, a team with a high standard deviation might be the type of team that scores a lot (strong offense) but also concedes a lot (weak defense), or, vice versa, that might have a poor offense but compensates by being difficult to score on.

Trying to predict which teams, on any given day, will win, may include looking at the standard deviations of the various team "stats" ratings, in which anomalies can match strengths vs. weaknesses to attempt to understand what factors may prevail as stronger indicators of eventual scoring outcomes.

In racing, a driver is timed on successive laps. A driver with a low standard deviation of lap times is more consistent than a driver with a higher standard deviation. This information can be used to help understand where opportunities might be found to reduce lap times.

**Finance**In finance, standard deviation is a representation of the risk associated with a given security (stocks, bonds, property, etc.), or the risk of a portfolio of securities (actively managed mutual funds, index mutual funds, or ETFs). Risk is an important factor in determining how to efficiently manage a portfolio of investments because it determines the variation in returns on the asset and/or portfolio and gives investors a mathematical basis for investment decisions (known as mean-variance optimization). The overall concept of risk is that as it increases, the expected return on the asset will increase as a result of the risk premium earned – in other words, investors should expect a higher return on an investment when said investment carries a higher level of risk, or uncertainty of that return. When evaluating investments, investors should estimate both the expected return and the uncertainty of future returns. Standard deviation provides a quantified estimate of the uncertainty of future returns.

For example, let's assume an investor had to choose between two stocks. Stock A over the last 20 years had an average return of 10%, with a standard deviation of 20% and Stock B, over the same period, had average returns of 12%, but a higher standard deviation of 30%. On the basis of risk and return, an investor may decide that Stock A is the safer choice, because Stock B's additional 2% points of return is not worth the additional 10% standard deviation (greater risk or uncertainty of the expected return). Stock B is likely to fall short of the initial investment (but also to exceed the initial investment) more often than Stock A under the same circumstances, and is estimated to return only 2% more on average. In this example, Stock A is expected to earn about 10%, plus or minus 20% (a range of 30% to -10%), about two-thirds of the future year returns. When considering more extreme possible returns or outcomes in future, an investor should expect results of up to 10% plus or minus 90%, or a range from 100% to -80%, which includes outcomes for three standard deviations from the average return (about 99.7% of probable returns). Actually, neither stock A or B is a good choice because an S&P 500 index fund over the same period would have had about the same 10% average return and a lower standard deviation of about 15%, because of the diversification benefit of 500 stocks versus one stock, making it always the statistically preferred investment.

Calculating the average return (or arithmetic mean) of a security over a given number of periods will generate an expected return on the asset. For each period, subtracting the expected return from the actual return results in the variance. Square the variance in each period to find the effect of the result on the overall risk of the asset. The larger the variance in a period, the greater risk the security carries. Taking the average of the squared variances results in the measurement of overall units of risk associated with the asset. Finding the square root of this variance will result in the standard deviation of the investment tool in question.

**Geometric interpretation**To gain some geometric insights, we will start with a population of three values, "x"

_{1}, "x"_{2}, "x"_{3}. This defines a point "P" = ("x"_{1}, "x"_{2}, "x"_{3}) in**R**^{3}. Consider the line "L" = {("r", "r", "r") : "r" in**R**}. This is the "main diagonal" going through the origin. If our three given values were all equal, then the standard deviation would be zero and "P" would lie on "L". So it is not unreasonable to assume that the standard deviation is related to the "distance" of "P" to "L". And that is indeed the case. Moving orthogonally from "P" to the line "L", one hits the point::$R\; =\; (overline\{x\},overline\{x\},overline\{x\})$

whose coordinates are the mean of the values we started out with. A little algebra shows that the distance between "P" and "R" (which is the same as the distance between "P" and the line "L") is given by σ√"3". An analogous formula (with 3 replaced by "N") is also valid for a population of "N" values; we then have to work in

**R**^{"N"}.**Chebyshev's inequality**An observation is rarely more than a few standard deviations away from the mean.

Chebyshev's inequality entails the following bounds for all distributions for which the standard deviation is defined.:At least 50% of the values are within √2 standard deviations from the mean. :At least 75% of the values are within 2 standard deviations from the mean. :At least 89% of the values are within 3 standard deviations from the mean.:At least 94% of the values are within 4 standard deviations from the mean.:At least 96% of the values are within 5 standard deviations from the mean.:At least 97% of the values are within 6 standard deviations from the mean.:At least 98% of the values are within 7 standard deviations from the mean.

And in general:

:At least (1 − 1/"k"

^{2}) × 100% of the values are within "k" standard deviations from the mean.**Rules for normally distributed data**The

central limit theorem says that the distribution of a sum of many independent, identically distributed random variables tends towards thenormal distribution . If a data distribution is approximately normal then about 68% of the values are within 1 standard deviation of the mean, about 95% of the values are within two standard deviations and about 99.7% lie within 3 standard deviations. This is known as the "68-95-99.7 rule ", or "the empirical rule".For various values of "z", the percentage of values expected to lie in the symmetric

confidence interval (−"z"σ,"z"σ) are as follows:**Relationship between standard deviation and mean**The mean and the standard deviation of a set of data are usually reported together. In a certain sense, the standard deviation is a "natural" measure of

statistical dispersion if the center of the data is measured about the mean. This is because the standard deviation from the mean is smaller than from any other point. The precise statement is the following: suppose "x"_{1}, ..., "x"_{"n"}are real numbers and define the function::$sigma(r)\; =\; sqrt\{frac\{1\}\{N-1\}\; sum\_\{i=1\}^N\; (x\_i\; -\; r)^2\}.$

Using

calculus , or simply bycompleting the square , it is possible to show that σ("r") has a unique minimum at the mean::$r\; =\; overline\{x\}.,$

(This can also be done with fairly simple algebra alone, since σ

^{2}("r") is equated to a quadratic polynomial).The

coefficient of variation of a sample is the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean. It is adimensionless number that can be used to compare the amount of variance between populations with different means.If we want to obtain the mean by sampling the distribution then the standard deviation of the mean is related to the standard deviation of the distribution by::$sigma\_\{\; ext\{mean=frac\{sigma\}\{sqrt\{N$where N is the number of samples used to sample the mean.

**Rapid calculation methods**A slightly faster (significantly for running standard deviation) way to compute the population standard deviation is given by the following formula (though considerations must be made for

round-off error ,arithmetic overflow , andarithmetic underflow conditions)::$sigma\; =\; sqrt\{left(frac\{1\}\{N\}sum\_\{i=1\}^N$x_i}^2} ight) - overline{x}^2} = sqrt{left(frac{1}{N}sum_{i=1}^Nx_i}^2} ight) - left(frac{1}{N}sum_{i=1}^Nx_i ight)^2} = frac{1}{N}sqrt{Nleft(sum_{i=1}^Nx_i}^2} ight) - left(sum_{i=1}^Nx_i ight)^2}

The following two formulas are a useful representation of running (continuous) standard deviation. A set of three power sums "s"

_{0,1,2}are each computed over a set of "N" values of "x", denoted as "x"_{k}. Given the results of these three running sumations, one can use $sigma$ at any time to compute the*current*value of the running standard deviation. This crafty definition for "s"_{j}allows us to easily represent the two different phases (summation computation "s"_{j}, and $sigma$ calculation). Note that "s"_{0}raises "x" to the zero power, and since $x^0$ is always "1", "s"_{0}evaluates to "N".:$sigma=\; frac\{1\}\{s\_0\}sqrt\{s\_0s\_2-s\_1^2\}$

where the power sums "s"

_{0}, "s"_{1}, "s"_{2}are defined by:$s\_j=sum\_\{k=1\}^N\{x\_k^j\}.$

In a computer implementation, as the three "s"

_{j}sums become large, we need to considerround-off error ,arithmetic overflow , andarithmetic underflow . To avoid this, we will periodically reduce their absolute values in a process reminiscent of normalizing aunit vector . Since "s"_{1}is the sum of values and "s"_{2}is the sum of squares, we can estimate these values for a smaller value of "N" simply by dividing by our current "N", and multiplying by a well-selected smaller "new-N". Our comparison with aunit vector encourages us to consider selecting "1" as the value of "new-N". However, this is a particularly poor choice, as the accuracy of our continuous approximation was established only for large "N", and this would cause our next value to have as much weight in the calculation as all previous values. A more appropriate value of "new-N" is the maximum value we can afford, such that we are sure we can renormalize back to "new-N" again before "N" again becomes large enough to introduce error (or catastrophe) as we add more values.Similarly for sample standard deviation::$s\; =\; sqrt\{frac\{sum\_\{i=1\}^N$x_i}^2} - Noverline{x}^2}{N-1} }.

Or from running sums:

:$s\; =\; sqrt\{frac\{Nsum\_\{i=1\}^N$x_i}^2} - left(sum_{i=1}^N{x_i} ight)^2}{N(N-1).

The above method can be very susceptible to rounding, underflow, and overflow errors, especially when the sample values are very close to the mean. It can actually give negative standard devation values, which should be impossible given the definition. This method is also given in a lot of textbooks. However, it should not be used. Below is a better method for calculating running sums method with reduced rounding errors::$A\_1=x\_1$:$A\_i=A\_\{i-1\}+frac\{x\_i-A\_\{i-1${i}where A is the mean value.:$Q\_1=0$:$Q\_i=Q\_\{i-1\}+frac\{(i-1)(x\_i-A\_\{i-1\})^2\}\{i\}$sample variance::$s^2\_n=frac\{Q\_n\}\{n-1\}$standard variance:$sigma^2\_n=frac\{Q\_n\}\{n\}$

For weighted distribution it is somewhat more complicated:The mean is given by::$A\_1=x\_1$:$A\_i=A\_\{i-1\}+(x\_i-A\_\{i-1\})frac\{w\_i\}\{sum^\{i\}\_\{j=1\}\; w\_j\}$where $w\_j$ are the weights.:$Q\_1=0$:$Q\_i=Q\_\{i-1\}+w\_ifrac\{sum^\{i-1\}\_\{j=1\}\; w\_j\}\{sum^\{i\}\_\{j=1\}\; w\_j\}\; (\; x\_i-A\_\{i-1\})^2$:$s^2\_n=Q\_n\; frac\{n\text{'}\}\{(n\text{'}-1)sum^\{n\}\_\{j=1\}\; w\_j\}$:$sigma^2\_n=Q\_n\; frac\{1\}\{sum^\{n\}\_\{j=1\}\; w\_j\}$where n is the total number of elements, and n' is the number of elements with non-zero weights.The above formulas become equal to the more simple formulas given above if we take all weights equal to 1.

**ee also***

Accuracy and precision

*Algorithms for calculating variance

*An inequality on location and scale parameters

*Chebyshev's inequality

*Confidence interval

*Cumulant

*Deviation (statistics)

*Geometric standard deviation

*Kurtosis

*Mean absolute error

*Mean

*Median

*Pooled standard deviation

*Raw score

*Root mean square

*Sample size

*Saturation (color theory)

*Skewness

* Standard error

*Standard score

*Unbiased estimation of standard deviation

* Volatility

*Yamartino method for calculating standard deviation of wind direction**References****External links*** [

*http://www.stats4students.com/Essentials/Measures-Of-Spread/Overview_3.php A Guide to Understanding & Calculating Standard Deviation*]

* [*http://www.techbookreport.com/tutorials/stddev-30-secs.html Standard Deviation - an explanation without maths*]

* [*http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/A16252.html Standard Deviation, an elementary introduction*]

* [*http://www.robertniles.com/stats/stdev.shtml Standard Deviation, a simpler explanation for writers and journalists*]

* [*http://invsee.asu.edu/srinivas/stdev.html Standard Deviation Calculator*]

* [*http://www.stat.tamu.edu/~jhardin/applets/ Texas A&M Standard Deviation and Confidence Interval Calculators*]

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*