City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health

City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued 30 November, 1982
Decided 15 June, 1983
Full case name City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Et Al.
Prior history Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
The city of Akron, Ohio's then-current abortion law, whose provisions included a 24-hour waiting period and the requirement that a doctor inform the patient of the stage of fetal development, the supposed health risks of abortion, and the availability of adoption and childbirth resources, was unconstitutional.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Powell, joined by Burger, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens
Dissent O'Connor, joined by White, Rehnquist
Laws applied
Roe v. Wade
Overruled by
Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)

City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 462 U.S. 416 (1983)[1], was a case in which the United States Supreme Court affirmed its abortion rights jurisprudence. The case, decided June 15, 1983, struck down an Ohio abortion law with several provisions.


Provisions of the law and decision regarding them

  • Abortions after the first trimester must be performed in a hospital.
    • Unconstitutional: while the state has a compelling interest in regulating abortion after the first trimester, accepted medical practice does not recommend that all second-trimester abortions be performed in a hospital. The regulation imposes an unnecessary burden that has the effect of infringing upon the constitutional right to an abortion.
  • A physician may not perform an abortion on an unmarried minor under 15 without obtaining either consent from one of her parents or a judicial bypass.
    • Unconstitutional: the law and the Ohio courts provide no suitable mechanism for a minor to gain a judicial bypass, as the relevant laws and courts concerning juveniles do not mention abortion or establish the authority to determine the maturity or emancipation of a minor.
  • Before performing an abortion, the physician must inform the patient of the status of the pregnancy, stage of fetal development, expected date of viability, health risks of abortion, and availability of adoption agencies and childbirth resources.
    • Unconstitutional: the script, ostensibly provided to ensure informed consent, was found to be geared towards influencing the patient to choose not to have an abortion. The state may not attempt to influence the patient's choice between abortion and childbirth. The Ohio regulation extends the state's interest in informed consent beyond permissible limits, interfering with the discretion of the physician and placing unreasonable obstacles in his path.
      • The requirement that doctors tell patients that the fetus is "a human life from the moment of conception" also violates the provision in Roe v. Wade that "a State may not adopt one theory of when life begins to justify its regulation of abortions."
      • The detailed description of the fetus that doctors are required to provide is speculative.
      • The list of risks of abortion that the doctor is required to provide is "intended to suggest that abortion is a particularly dangerous procedure" and also overrides the physician's judgment, as he must tell his patient specific risks even if they are not present for that patient.
  • A 24-hour waiting period is imposed after the patient signs a consent form.
    • Unconstitutional: no state interest is served by the imposition of an "arbitrary and inflexible" waiting period.
  • Physicians must ensure that fetal remains are disposed of in a "humane and sanitary manner."
    • Unconstitutional: because criminal sanctions are imposed upon doctors who break this law, "humane" is unconstitutionally vague and a violation of due process. Rather than strike down "humane" and preserve "sanitary," the court struck down the entire provision.


In her dissenting opinion, Justice O'Connor (joined by Justices White and Rehnquist), urged that "the 'unduly burdensome' standard" from two prior cases, Maher v. Roe[2] and Bellotti v. Baird "be applied to the challenged regulations throughout the entire pregnancy without reference to the particular 'stage' of pregnancy involved."[1] The "undue burden" test was later to gain acceptance by a plurality of the Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which replaced the earlier "strict scrutiny" standard of review of abortion regulations with the lesser "undue burden" standard, a standard which remains in effect.[3]

City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health was overruled by the plurality in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.


  1. ^ a b FindLaw
  2. ^ MAHER V. ROE, 432 U. S. 464 (1977) - US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez
  3. ^ "The undue burden standard is binding on lower courts, see Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977) (defining the holding of a divided Court as the view of the members of the Court who concurred on the narrowest grounds), although for stare decisis purposes, only the portion of the three-Justice opinion that garnered five votes counts as a full-fledged precedent in the Supreme Court itself." Michael C. Dorf, INCIDENTAL BURDENS ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 1175 at Note 197.

See also

External links

  • Text of City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 462 U.S. 416 (1983) is available from: Justia · Findlaw

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно сделать НИР?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Akron, Ohio — Akron redirects here. For other uses, see Akron (disambiguation). City of Akron   City   …   Wikipedia

  • Sandra Day O'Connor — Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States In office September 25, 1981 – January 31, 2006 Nominated by …   Wikipedia

  • Planned Parenthood v. Casey — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Planned Parenthood v. Casey ArgueDate=April 22 ArgueYear=1992 DecideDate=June 29 DecideYear=1992 FullName=Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania, et al. v. Robert P. Casey, et al. USVol=505 USPage=833 Citation=112 S …   Wikipedia

  • Abortion law — legend|#B3B3B3|No informationAbortion law is legislation which pertains to the provision of abortion. Abortion has at times emerged as a controversial subject in various societies because of the moral and ethical issues that surround it, though… …   Wikipedia

  • Undue burden standard — The undue burden standard is a constitutional test fashioned by the Supreme Court of the United States. The test, first developed in the late 1800s, is widely used in American constitutional law. [Stuart Streichler, Justice Curtis in the Civil… …   Wikipedia

  • John Roberts Supreme Court nomination — The Senate hearings on the nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court, began on September 12, 2005, with U.S. Senators posing questions to Roberts, who was nominated by President George W. Bush to fill the vacancy of Chief Justice of the… …   Wikipedia

  • List of court cases involving the American Civil Liberties Union — This is a list of cases that have involved the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to some degree.1920s1925 * Tennessee v. Scopes (Scopes Trial) paid for John Scopes defense * Gitlow v. New York represented Benjamin Gitlow1927 * Whitney v.… …   Wikipedia

  • Colautti v. Franklin — Supreme Court of the United States Argued October 3, 1978 Decided January 9, 197 …   Wikipedia

  • Rust v. Sullivan — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Rust v. Sullivan ArgueDate=October 30 ArgueYear=1990 DecideDate=May 23 DecideYear=1991 FullName=Irving Rust, et al., Petitioners v. Linus W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services; New York, et al., Petitioners v.… …   Wikipedia

  • Catholicism and American politics — Catholics represent the largest Christian denomination in America with about 65 million professing the faith in 2003. The 2001 census bureau estimates that 25.9% of the population of adults identify themselves as Catholics (see Demographics of… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”