- ArcelorMittal Orbit
-
ArcelorMittal Orbit
The structure in November 2011General information Status Constructed Type Observation tower Location Olympic Park, London, United Kingdom Coordinates 51°32′18.27″N 0°0′48.05″W / 51.5384083°N 0.0133472°WCoordinates: 51°32′18.27″N 0°0′48.05″W / 51.5384083°N 0.0133472°W Estimated completion December 2011 at the latest Cost £19.1m Height Antenna spire 115 m (377 ft) Technical details Floor count 2 Elevator count 1 Design and construction Owner Olympic Park Legacy Company (on completion) Architect Anish Kapoor with Cecil Balmond Developer Arcelor Mittal and London Development Agency Structural engineer Arup The ArcelorMittal Orbit is a 115 metres (377 ft) high observation tower in the Olympic Park in Stratford, London. The steel sculpture is Britain's largest piece of public art, and is a permanent, lasting legacy of London's hosting of the 2012 Summer Olympics, assisting in the post-Olympics regeneration of the Stratford area. Sited between the Olympic Stadium and the Aquatics Centre, allows visitors to view the whole Olympic Park from two observation platforms.
Orbit was designed by Anish Kapoor in collaboration with engineer Cecil Balmond. Announced on 31 March 2010, the tower is expected to be completed by December 2011 at the latest. The project came about after Mayor of London Boris Johnson and Olympics Minister Tessa Jowell decided in 2008 that the Olympic Park needed "something extra". Designers were asked for ideas for an "Olympic tower" of at least 100 metres (330 ft), and Orbit was the unanimous choice from various proposals considered by a nine person advisory panel.
The project is expected to cost £19.1m, with £16m of that coming from the involvement of Britain's richest man, the steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal, chairman of the ArcelorMittal steel company, with the balance of £3.1m coming from the London Development Agency. The official name of the sculpture, "ArcelorMittal Orbit", combines the name of Mittal's company, as chief sponsor, with Orbit, the original working title of Kapoor and Balmond's design.
Both Kapoor and Balmond believe Orbit represents a radical advance in the architectural field of combining sculpture and structural engineering, and believe that it combines both stability and instability in a work that visitors can engage with and experience, via an incorporated spiral walkway. The structure has been both praised and criticised for its bold design, while it has also been criticised as a vanity project, of questionable lasting use or merit as a public art project.
Contents
History
According to Boris Johnson, around October 2008, he and Tessa Jowell decided the Stratford, London, site being used as the Olympic Park for the 2012 Olympics needed "something extra", to "distinguish the east London skyline" and "arouse the curiosity and wonder of Londoners and visitors".[1]
A design competition held in 2009 called for designs for an "Olympic tower", receiving around 50 submissions in all.[2] Johnson has said his early concept for the project was something more modest than Orbit, something along the lines of "a kind of 21st century Trajan's Column", but this was dropped when more daring ideas were received.[1]
The media were reporting unconfirmed details of the project in October 2009, describing steel magnate and Britain's richest man, Lakshmi Mittal's interest in funding a project which would cost around £15m, with Johnson believed to want something like the Eiffel Tower or the Statue of Liberty.[3][4] At that time, there were understood to be five short-listed artists, including Angel of the North designer Antony Gormley, being considered for the project.[3] Early designs reportedly included 'Transmission' by Paul Fryer, a 400 feet (120 m) high structure, "resembling a cross between a pylon and a native American totem pole", according to The Times.[3] A spokesman for Johnson would only confirm he was "keen to see stunning, ambitious, world-class art in the Olympic Park", and that work on the commissioning project was at an early stage.[3][4]
Mittal's involvement in the project came about after a chance meeting with Johnson in a cloakroom in Davos in January 2009,[5] as they were on their way to separate dinner engagements; in a conversation that took "45 seconds" he pitched the idea to Mittal, who immediately agreed to supply the steel.[1] Mittal later said of his involvement, "I never expected that this was going to be such a huge project. I thought it was just the supply of some steel, a thousand tonnes or so, and that would be it. But then we started working with artists and I realised that the object was not just to supply steel but to complete the whole project. It took us almost 15 months of negotiation and discussion".[6] Johnson has said that, "In reality, ArcelorMittal has given much more than the steel."[1]
Kapoor's Orbit was officially announced as the winner on 31 March 2010.[7] According to The Guardian, Orbit was chosen from a final short-list of three, with Orbit beating one design submitted by Antony Gormley, and another submitted by the architectural firm Caruso St John.[8] According to The Times, Gormley's design was a 390 feet (120 m) steel colossus titled Olympian Man, a trademark piece of a statue of himself, rejected mainly on the grounds of its £40m cost.[9]
Johnson and Jowell agreed to issue a commission for Orbit in partnership with Mittal, after it was chosen by a 9 person advisory panel brought together by them to advise on a long list of proposals.[1][7] According to Mittal, the panel made a unanimous decision to pick Orbit, as it both represented the games, and was achievable within the ambitious time frame.[2] Kapoor described it as "the commission of a lifetime".[7]
Johnson pre-empted possible criticism of the project during the official launch, by stating: "Of course some people will say we are nuts – in the depths of a recession – to be building Britain’s biggest ever piece of public art. But both Tessa Jowell and I are certain that this is the right thing for the Stratford site, in Games time and beyond."[1]
Design
Interpretation
According to Kapoor, the design brief from the Mayor's office was for a "tower of at least 100 metres (330 ft)", while Balmond said he was told the Mayor was "looking for an icon to match the Eiffel Tower".[10]
Kapoor said one of the influences in his design for the tower was the Tower of Babel, the sense of "building the impossible" that "has something mythic about it.", and that the form "straddles Eiffel and Tatlin".[10] Balmond, working on the metaphor of an orbit, envisaged an electron cloud moving, to create a structure that appears unstable, propping itself up, "never centred, never quite vertical"[10] Both believe Orbit represents a new way of thinking, "a radical new piece of structure and architecture and art" which utilises non-linearity - the use of "instabilities as stabilities."[10] The spaces inside the structure, in between the twisting steel, are "cathedral like", according to Balmond, while according to Kapoor, the intention is that visitors will engage with the piece as they wind "up and up and in on oneself" on the spiral walkway.[10]
The Independent describes Orbit as "a continuously looping lattice...made up of eight strands winding into each other and combined by rings like a jagged knot", The Guardian describes it as a "giant lattice tripod sporting a counterweight collar around its neck designed to offset the weight of its head, a two-storey dining and viewing gallery", while according to the BBC, the design incorporates the five Olympic rings.[11][12][13]
Upon its launch, Johnson said of the "mind-boggling" design, that "It would have boggled the minds of the Romans. It would have boggled Gustave Eiffel."[11] Design panel member Nick Serota said Orbit was a tower with an interesting twist, with "the energy you might traditionally associate with this type of structure but in a surprisingly female form".[14]
Name
According to Mittal, Orbit was already a working title of the design by Kapoor and Balmond, as it symbolised a continuous journey, a creative representation of the "extraordinary physical and emotional effort" that Olympians undertake in their continuous drive to do better. It was decided to keep this as the final name, and prepend the name of Mittal's company ArcelorMittal as the project supporter.[2]
On the public announcement of the design, Johnson conceded that it may become known by something other than its official name, suggesting "Colossus of Stratford" or the "Hubble Bubble", in reference to his belief it resembled a giant shisha pipe, or variant on people's perceptions that it resembled a "giant treble clef", a "helter-skelter", or a "supersized mutant trombone".[8]
Height
Orbit will be 115 metres (377 ft) tall.[7] Other contradictory reports have suggested it will be 120 metres (390 ft) tall.[8][15][16][17] The Greater London Authority have stated that it will become, when completed, the tallest sculpture in Britain,[18] currently 'Aspire' at 60m. According to The Independent and The Guardian it will become Britain's largest piece of public art.[11][17]
The authority itself on announcing the project, chose to describe Orbit's height in comparison to the Statue of Liberty, relaying how it will be 22 metres (72 ft) taller than that iconic New York City landmark.[7] The statue of Liberty is 93 metres (305 ft) high, when counting the 46 metres (151 ft) statue together with its pedestal. While the media picked up the apparent intention of the authority to cast the Orbit as London's answer to the Eiffel Tower, The Guardian related how it was "considerably shorter" than that Parisian icon;[8][11][19] the Eiffel Tower is 324 metres (1,063 ft) tall. The Guardian also noted that, with respect to comparisons to Eiffel's Tower, it is even "20 metres (66 ft) shorter than the diminutive Blackpool Tower".[19]
The structure's height was also compared in the media with other London landmarks. It was described as being "slightly taller" or "nearly 20 metres (66 ft) taller" than the Big Ben clock tower, the centrepiece of the Palace of Westminster.[8][11] It was also described as being "twice as tall" or "more than double the height" of Nelson's Column, the monument honouring Admiral Nelson located in Trafalgar Square.[11][20] Others reports described how it was "just short of" or "almost as tall as" the Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt, the ancient tomb of the Pharaoh Khufu.[8][21] Big Ben is 96.3 metres (316 ft) tall, Nelson's Column is 51.5 metres (169 ft) tall in total, including statue and column. The Giza Pyramid was thought to have been constructed as 280 Egyptian cubits or 146.478 metres (480.57 ft) tall, although with erosion it has reduced in height by nearly 10 metres.
Use
As an observation tower, the Orbit will contain two indoor viewing platforms on two levels, with each level having the capacity for 150 people.[11] In comparison to the Orbit's 115m height, the nearby Olympic Stadium will be 193 feet (59 m) high.[20] According to the Greater London Authority, the observation platform will offer "unparalleled views of the entire 250 acres (1.0 km2; 0.39 sq mi) of the Olympic Park and London's skyline".[7]
According to the Greater London Authority, visitors will travel up the tower in a lift, and will have the option of descending using a spiral staircase incorporated into the structure.[7] Kapoor however suggests visitors will be able to ascend using the walkway, as they wind "up and up and in on oneself."[10] Similarly, The Independent reports that visitors will be able to climb the structure, and The Guardian reports that people will be able to "sprint up and down its 500 winding stairs".[11][12] Kapoor describes the walkway as "a long way to walk" and "pretty steep".[10]
The tower was expected to be able to cope with visitor numbers of 700 people per hour.[11] As of March 2010, it was undecided whether visitors would be charged to enter the tower.[8] The base of the tower will include a visitor pavilion and educational exhibition.[11] The top of the tower may also include a dining area.[11]
Once completed, Orbit will be owned and operated by the Olympic Park Legacy Company.[7] The ambition is that, as well as being a focal point for the Olympic Park during the Games, it will also form part of the wider Stratford regeneration plans, which aim to turn the Olympic site into a permanent tourist destination after the Games.[1] Tessa Jowell said Orbit will be "like to honey to bees for the millions of tourists that visit London each year".[7] Boris Johnson predicted the tower would become "the perfect iconic cultural legacy".[7] According to Lord Coe, chairman of the London 2012 Olympic organisers, the tower would play a central part in the Game's role of leaving a lasting legacy and transformed landscape in east London.[7]
Funding
At the time of its public launch, the total cost of the Orbit project was announced as £19.1m.[7] ArcelorMittal was to fund up to £16m of the cost, with the remaining £3.1m being provided by the London Development Agency.[7] This consists a £10m cash donation, and £6 million in underwriting of capital costs, which could be potentially recovered from profits generated after the Games.[7] According to Johnson, the cost of the project would be recouped after the games through the private hire of a dining area at the top of the tower, predicting it would become a "corporate money-making venture".[11]
Mittal said he was immediately interested in the project after he remembered the excitement that surrounded the announcement that London had won the Olympic bid. He saw it as an opportunity to leave a lasting legacy for London, showcase the "unique qualities of steel" and play a role in the regeneration of Stratford.[2] Mittal said of his involvement in the project, "I live in London – I’ve lived here since 1997 – and I think it’s a wonderful city. This project is an incredible opportunity to build something really spectacular for London, for the Olympic Games and something that will play a lasting role in the legacy of the Games."[2]
Advisory panel member and director of the Tate gallery, Nicholas Serota, said Orbit was "the perfect answer to the question of how sport and art come together", and praised Mr Mittal's "really impressive piece of patronage" for supporting a "great commission".[14]
Reception
When plans were first reported for an Olympic tower, the media pointed to a previous manifesto pledge of Johnson's to crack down on tall buildings, in order to preserve London's "precious" skyline.[3][4] The Times criticised the idea as a vanity project of Johnson's, with a design "matching his bravado", built to "seal his legacy", surmising it would be compared to other similar vanity projects such as Benito Mussolini's "wedding cake", the Monument to Vittorio Emanuele II built in Rome, or the Neutrality Arch, a rotating golden statue erected by Turkmenistan's President Saparmurat Niyazov, while comparing Johnson to Ozymandias.[3] Art critic Brian Sewell said "Our country is littered with public art of absolutely no merit. We are entering a new period of fascist gigantism. These are monuments to egos and you couldn't find a more monumental ego than Boris."[3][4]
Richard Morrison of The Times described Orbit as "like an enormous wire-mesh fence that has got hopelessly snagged round the bell of a giant french horn", adding that it "seems like an awful lot of trouble just to look at East London", in comparison to a music hall comedian's refrain at the $16 million cost of the Brooklyn Bridge.[21] Morrison not only compared Johnson not only to Ozymandias, but the 20th century dictators Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Nicolae Ceauşescu, in their acts of "phallic politics" in building grandiose monuments.[21] Criticising the lack of public involvement, he described how it would be an "undesired intrusion by the few into the consciousness of the many".[21] He feared that it could become one of the many "thousands of naff eyesores" of recent public art in Britain, citing the embracing couple at St Pancras station (The Meeting Place), the Dockland's Traffic Light tree, and the proposed Rotherhithe Tunnel 'match-stick man' tribute to Isambard Kingdom Brunel, as London based examples.[21]
Jay Merrick of The Independent said of Orbit that "its sculptural power lies in its ability to suggest an unfinished form in the process of becoming something else", describing how its artistic riskiness elevated it above the banal artworks of the public art movement that have been built elsewhere in Britain's towns and cities. Merrick was of the opinion that it would be either loved or hated, being a design which is "beautifully fractious, and not quite knowable".[16]
Jonathan Glancey of The Guardian described Orbit as "Olympian in ambition" and a "fusion between striking art and daring engineering", and said that, the Aquatics Centre apart, it represented the architecturally striking Joker in the pack, given that the rest of the landscaping and architecture for the Games "promises little to get excited about". He believed it would become a "genuine eyecatcher" for the Olympics television coverage, with its extraordinary form being a "strange and enticing marriage of sorts" between the Eiffel Tower and the un-built early Soviet era Tatlin's Tower, with the biblical Tower of Babel as "best man".[12]
Describing it as looking like a "catastrophic collision between two cranes", the Daily Mail reported how the structure had been immediately been nicknamed the 'Eyeful Tower', as well as reflecting specific internet comments of it being 'a rollercoaster that costs £19million a go', or that it resembled 'twisted spaghetti', 'horrific squiggles' and 'Meccano on crack'.[20] The Times also reported the description "Godzilla of public art".[9]
With regard to its potential as a lasting visitor attraction, Mark Brown of The Guardian reflected on the mixed fortunes of other large symbolic London visitor attractions, the popular but loss making Thames Tunnel, the Skylon tower, dismantled on the orders of Winston Churchill, and the successful London Eye.[8]
Tom Dyckhoff of The Times, while calling it a "a gift to the tabloids" and a "giant Mr. Messy", questioned whether the Olympic site needed another pointless icon, postulating whether Orbit would stand the test of time like the London Eye and become a true icon to match the Eiffel Tower, or a hopeless white elephant. Suggesting the project had echoes of Tatlin's Monument to the Third International, and especially Constant Nieuwenhuys' utopian city New Babylon, he asked whether Orbit was just as revolutionary or possessed the same ideological purpose, or whether it was merely "a giant advert for one of the world’s biggest multinationals, sweetened with a bit of fun".[15]
Rowan Moore of The Guardian questioned if Orbit was going to be anything more than a folly, or whether it would be as eloquent as the Statue of Liberty.[22] He speculated that the project might mark the time when society stops using large iconic projects as a tool for lifting areas out of deprivation. He questioned its ability to draw people's attention to Stratford after the Games, in a similar manner to the successes of the Angel of the North or the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao.[22] He also questioned the piece's ability to strike a chord like the Angel, which he believed had at least "created a feelgood factor and sense of pride" in Gateshead, or whether it would simply become one of the "many more unloved rotting wrecks that no one has the nerve to demolish". He postulated that the addition of stairs and a lift made Orbit less succinct than Kapoor's previous successful works, while ultimately he said "hard to see what the big idea is, beyond the idea of making something big".[22]
John Graham-Cumming of The Guardian rejected the comparison's to the goal of being an icon like the Eiffel Tower, pointing out that that structure had not intended to be a lasting monument, only persisting into public acceptance as art through being useful, while also pointing out the Colossus of Rhodes collapsed within a few decades, and the Tower of Babel was "constructed to glorify those that constructed it." He suggested that Johnson should reconsider whether it should be pulled down after 20 years. Questioning its corporate role, he believed that meant it looked less and less like a work of art and more like a vanity project.[19]
Responding to concerns from The Times that ArcelorMittal's sponsorship and naming of Orbit would represent an improper incursion of corporate branding into public life, Johnson stated that Olympic rules mean that the Orbit cannot carry any corporate branding during the games.[5] Felicity Carus of The Guardian's environment blog questioned whether ArcelorMittal's record on carbon emissions was good enough to mean Orbit represented a fitting monument for the 2012 Olympics, billed as a 'world's first sustainable Olympics'.[23]
A Guardian online poll published on the official launch, posing the question "Anish Kapoor's Olympic tower: a grand design?", recorded 38.6% for "Yes, it's a grand design" and 61.4% for "No, it's garbage".[24]
Advisory panel
The people on the advisory panel were:[7]
- Nicholas Serota, director of the Tate gallery
- Julia Peyton-Jones, director of the Serpentine Gallery
- Hans-Ulrich Obrist, also of the Serpentine Gallery
- Sarah Weir of the Olympic Delivery Authority
- Stuart Lipton of Chelsfield LLP
- Anita Zabludowicz of the 176 gallery Zabludowicz collection
- Michael Morris and James Lingwood, directors of the Artangel arts commissioning organisation
- Munira Mirza, the Mayoral Advisor on Arts and Culture
In announcing the winning design, Johnson also thanked the Greater London Authority, the Olympic Delivery Authority and the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games, as well as David McAlpine and Philip Dilley of Arup, and Sir Robin Wales and Jules Pipe for their involvement and support in the project.[1]
See also
- B of the Bang, the 2002 Manchester Commonwealth Games sculpture
- Skylon, the London 1951 Festival of Britain tower
- The White Horse at Ebbsfleet, a proposed giant sculpture for Kent
Footnotes
- ^ a b c d e f g h ArcelorMittal Orbit brochure, page 3
- ^ a b c d e ArcelorMittal Orbit brochure, page 5
- ^ a b c d e f g Chris Gourlay and Cristina Ruiz (25 October 2009). "Look out, Paris, Boris plans a ‘Piffle Tower’". The Sunday Times (London). http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6889040.ece. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- ^ a b c d Andrew Hough (25 October 2009). "London 2012: new Olympics structure would 'rival Eiffel Tower'". The Sunday Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/olympics/news/6429245/London-2012-new-Olympics-structure-would-rival-Eiffel-Tower.html. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- ^ a b Ben Hoyle (1 April 2010). "'Hubble Bubble' tower will be icon of Olympic legacy". The Times (London). http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article7083022.ece. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
- ^ Andrew Cave (3 April 2010). "China: the final frontier for Mittal". The Telegraph (London). http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/7550085/China-the-final-frontier-for-Mittal.html. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Anish Kapoor to design iconic visitor attraction for Olympic Park. . www.london.gov.uk > Media > Press Releases (Greater London Authority). 31 March 2010. http://www.london.gov.uk/media/press_releases_mayoral/anish-kapoor-design-iconic-visitor-attraction-olympic-park. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Mark Brown (31 March 2010). "Anish Kapoor's tangled tower at the heart of London 2012". The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/31/anish-kapoor-olympics-london-2012. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- ^ a b Chris Gourlay and Cristina Ruiz (11 April 2010). "Nude Antony Gormley giant lost Olympic statue race". The Times (London). http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/olympics/london_2012/article7094296.ece. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
- ^ a b c d e f g ArcelorMittal Orbit brochure, page 11
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l John Hall (31 March 2010). "'Mind boggling' artwork that will tower over London". The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/architecture/mind-boggling-artwork-that-will-tower-over-london-1932413.html. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- ^ a b c Jonathan Glancey (1 April 2010). "First among Olympian obelisks". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/apr/01/london-kapoor. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- ^ "Anish Kapoor chosen for landmark 2012 sculpture". BBC News. 31 March 2010. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts_and_culture/8597069.stm. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- ^ a b ArcelorMittal Orbit brochure, page 14
- ^ a b Tom Dyckhoff (31 March 2010). "Just what London needs, a giant squiggle". The Times. http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/visual_arts/architecture_and_design/article7083500.ece. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
- ^ a b Jay Merrick (1 April 2010). "120m high and very, very red: the best seat at the Olympic Games". The Independent (London). http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/architecture/120m-high-and-very-very-red-the-best-seat-at-the-olympic-games-1932731.html. Retrieved 20 May 2010.
- ^ a b Mark Brown (31 March 2010). "Climb this: Anish Kapoor's massive artwork that will tower over London". The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/31/anish-kapoor-artwork-tower-london. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
- ^ "The ArcelorMittal Orbit". www.london.gov.uk > Art & Culture > London 2012 > The ArcelorMittal Orbit, About the Orbit. undated. http://www.london.gov.uk/arcelormittal-orbit. Retrieved 14 May 2010.[dead link]
- ^ a b c John Graham-Cumming (2 April 2010). "Will the Orbit become London's Eiffel?". The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/02/orbit-eiffel-tower-olympics. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
- ^ a b c Paul Harris (1 April 2010). "Britain's biggest piece of public art, but is this £19m tower of twisted metal a fitting monument for the London 2012 Olympics?". The Daily Mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1262533/The-Hubble-Bubble-tower-welcome-visitors-London-2012-Olympics.html. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- ^ a b c d e Richard Morrison (2 April 2010). "True public art or just public posturing?". The Times (London). http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/visual_arts/architecture_and_design/article7084787.ece. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- ^ a b c Rowan Moore (4 April 2010). "Is the Orbit anything more than a folly on an Olympic scale?". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/04/anish-kapoor-london-olympics. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
- ^ Felicity Carus (9 April 2010). "ArcelorMittal's emissions make a monumental joke of Olympic park tower". The Guardian (London). http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/apr/09/arcelormittal-anish-kapoor-orbit. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
- ^ "Olympic heights". The Guardian (London). 31 March 2010. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/poll/2010/mar/31/architecture-design. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
Cite error:
Cite error:<ref>
tag with name"OrbitBrochureP7"
defined in<references>
is not used in prior text; see the help page.<ref>
tag with name"OrbitBrochureCover"
defined in<references>
is not used in prior text; see the help page.References
- "ArcelorMittal Orbit" (pdf). www.london.gov.uk > Art & Culture > London 2012 > The ArcelorMittal Orbit > Download a detailed overview. Mayor of London. undated. pp. 15. Archived from the original on 13 April 2010. http://www.webcitation.org/5oy0TSuzV. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
- "London 2012: Anish Kapoor Orbit tower takes shape". BBC News. 25 February 2011. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-12584721.
External links
- Orbit Anish Kapoor website
- The ArcelorMittal Orbit Greater London Authority
- 360 degree view of the Orbit London Mayor's YouTube channel
Anish Kapoor Sculptures Categories:- 2011 architecture
- Buildings and structures in London
- Visitor attractions in London
- Steel sculptures
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.