William Tecumseh Sherman

Infobox Military Person
name= William Tecumseh Sherman
born= birth date|mf=yes|1820|02|8
died= death date and age|mf=yes|1891|02|14|1820|02|08
placeofbirth= Lancaster, Ohio
placeofdeath= New York City, New York
placeofburial=


caption= Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman, USA, in May 1865. The black ribbon around his left arm is a sign of mourning over President Lincoln's death. Portrait by Mathew Brady.
nickname= Cump, Uncle Billy (by his troops)
allegiance=flag|United States of America
branch=United States Army
serviceyears= 1840–53, 1861–84
rank= Major General (Civil War), General of the Army of the United States (postbellum)
commands= Army of the Tennessee (1863), Military Division of the Mississippi (1864), Commanding General of the United States Army (postbellum)
unit=
battles= American Civil War -Shiloh, - Vicksburg Campaign, - Chattanooga, - Atlanta Campaign, - March to the Sea, - Carolinas Campaign
awards= Thanks of Congress (1864 and 1865)
laterwork= Bank president, lawyer, university superintendent, streetcar executive
religion=Roman Catholic

William Tecumseh Sherman (February 8, 1820 – February 14, 1891) was an American soldier, businessman, educator, and author. He served as a General in the Union Army during the American Civil War (1861–65), for which he received recognition for his outstanding command of military strategy as well as criticism for the harshness of the "scorched earth" policies that he implemented in conducting total war against the Confederate States. Military historian Basil Liddell Hart famously declared that Sherman was "the first modern general". [Liddell Hart, p. 430]

Sherman served under General Ulysses S. Grant in 1862 and 1863 during the campaigns that led to the fall of the Confederate stronghold of Vicksburg on the Mississippi River and culminated with the routing of the Confederate armies in the state of Tennessee. In 1864, Sherman succeeded Grant as the Union commander in the western theater of the war. He proceeded to lead his troops to the capture of the city of Atlanta, a military success that contributed to the re-election of President Abraham Lincoln. Sherman's subsequent march through Georgia and the Carolinas further undermined the Confederacy's ability to continue fighting. He accepted the surrender of all the Confederate armies in the Carolinas, Georgia, and Florida in April 1865.

When Grant became president, Sherman succeeded him as Commanding General of the Army (1869–83). As such, he was responsible for the conduct of the Indian Wars in the western United States. He steadfastly refused to be drawn into politics and in 1875 published his "Memoirs", one of the best-known firsthand accounts of the Civil War.

Early life

Sherman was born in 1820 in Lancaster, Ohio, near the shores of the Hocking River. His father Charles Robert Sherman, a successful lawyer who sat on the Ohio Supreme Court, named him after the famous Shawnee leader Tecumseh. Judge Sherman died unexpectedly in 1829. He left his widow, Mary Hoyt Sherman, with eleven children and no inheritance. Following this tragedy, the nine-year-old Sherman was raised by a Lancaster neighbor and family friend, attorney Thomas Ewing, a prominent member of the Whig Party who served as senator from Ohio and as the first Secretary of the Interior. Sherman was distantly related to the politically influential Baldwin, Hoar & Sherman family and grew to admire American founding father Roger Sherman. [See, William T. Sherman papers, Notre Dame University CSHR 19/67 Folder:Roger Sherman's Watch 1932–1942]

Sherman's older brother Charles Taylor Sherman became a federal judge. One of his younger brothers, John Sherman, served as a U.S. senator and Cabinet secretary. Another younger brother, Hoyt Sherman, was a successful banker. Two of his foster brothers served as major generals in the Union Army during the Civil War: Hugh Boyle Ewing, later an ambassador and author, and Thomas Ewing, Jr., who would serve as defense attorney in the military trials against the Lincoln conspirators.

Naming controversy

Sherman's unusual given name has attracted considerable attention. Since 1932, it has often been reported that, as an infant, Sherman was named simply Tecumseh. According to these accounts, Sherman acquired the name "William" at age nine or ten, after being taken into the Ewing household. His foster mother, Maria Ewing, who was of Irish ancestry, was a devout Catholic. In the Ewing home, Sherman was baptized by a Dominican priest who supposedly used the name William because the event took place on a Saint William's Day – possibly June 25, the feast day of Saint William of Montevergine. [Lewis, p. 34.] However, this colorful account is dubious. Sherman himself states in his "Memoirs" that his father named him William Tecumseh, and there is corroborating evidence that Sherman was baptized by a Presbyterian minister as an infant and given the name William at that time. [Sherman, "Memoirs", p. 11; Lewis, p. 23; Schenker, "'My Father . . . Named Me William Tecumseh': Rebutting the Charge That General Sherman Lied About His Name," "Ohio History" (2008), vol. 115, p. 55; Sherman biographer John Marszalek considers the cited article to "present a convincing case regarding Sherman's name." Marszalek, "Preface" to 2007 edition of "Sherman: A Soldier's Passion for Order", pp. xiv-xv n.1.] As an adult, Sherman signed all his correspondence (even to his wife) "W.T. Sherman," [See, e.g., the many Civil War letters reproduced in Brooks D. Simpson & Jean V. Berlin, "Sherman's Civil War: Selected Correspondence of William T. Sherman" (Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 1999).] but his friends and family always called him "Cump." [See, for instance, Walsh, p. 32.] Despite having been baptized twice in his youth, Sherman did not adhere to any organized religion for much of his adult life. [See, for instance, Hirshson pp. 387–388. At the time of Sherman's death, his son Thomas, a Catholic priest, reportedly said: "My father was baptized in the Catholic Church, married in the Catholic Church, and attended the Catholic Church until the outbreak of the civil war. Since that time he has not been a communicant of any church . . . ." Thomas C. Fletcher, "Life and Reminiscences of General Wm. T. Sherman by Distinguished Men of His Time" (Baltimore: R.H. Woodward Co., 1891), 139.]

Military training and service

Senator Ewing secured an appointment for the 16 year old Sherman as a cadet in the United States Military Academy at West Point, [Sherman, "Memoirs", p. 14] where he roomed and became good friends with another important future Civil War General, George H. Thomas. There Sherman excelled academically, but treated the demerit system with indifference. Fellow cadet William Rosecrans would later remember Sherman at West Point as "one of the brightest and most popular fellows," and "a bright-eyed, red-headed fellow, who was always prepared for a lark of any kind." [Quoted in Hirshson, p. 13] About his time at West Point, Sherman says only the following in his "Memoirs":

Upon graduation in 1840, Sherman entered the Army as a second lieutenant in the 3rd U.S. Artillery and saw action in Florida in the Second Seminole War against the Seminole tribe. He was later stationed in Georgia and South Carolina. As the foster son of a prominent Whig politician, in Charleston, the popular Lt. Sherman moved within the upper circles of Old South society. [See, for instance, Hirshson, p. 21]

While many of his colleagues saw action in the Mexican-American War, Sherman performed administrative duties in the captured territory of California. He and fellow officer Lieutenant Edward Ord reached the town of Yerba Buena two days before its name was changed to San Francisco. In 1848, Sherman accompanied the military governor of California, Col. Richard Barnes Mason, in the inspection that officially confirmed the claim that gold had been discovered in the region, thus inaugurating the California Gold Rush. [ See [http://www.sfmuseum.org/bio/sherman.html Sherman at the Virtual Museum of San Francisco] and [http://www.sfmuseum.net/hist6/shermgold.html excerpts from Sherman's "Memoirs"] ] Sherman earned a brevet promotion to captain for his "meritorious service", but his lack of a combat assignment discouraged him and may have contributed to his decision to resign his commission. Sherman would become one of the relatively few high-ranking officers in the Civil War who had not fought in Mexico.

Marriage and business career

In 1850, Sherman was promoted to the substantive rank of Captain and married Thomas Ewing's daughter, Eleanor Boyle ("Ellen") Ewing, in a Washington ceremony attended by President Zachary Taylor and other political luminaries. (Thomas Ewing was serving as the first Secretary of the Interior at the time.) [Katherine Burton, "Three Generations: Maria Boyle Ewing - Ellen Ewing Sherman - Minnie Sherman Fitch" (Longmans, Green & Co., 1947), pp. 72-78.] Like her mother, Ellen Ewing Sherman was a devout Roman Catholic, and the Sherman's eight children were reared in that faith. In 1874, with Sherman having become world famous, their eldest child, Marie Ewing ("Minnie") Sherman, also had a politically prominent wedding, attended by President Ulysses S. Grant and commemorated by a generous gift from the Khedive of Egypt. [Burton, pp. 217-21, 226-27.] Another of the Sherman daughters, Eleanor was married to Alexander Montgomery Thackara at General Sherman’s home in Washington, D.C. on May 5, 1880. To Sherman's great displeasure and sorrow, one of his sons, Thomas Ewing Sherman, was ordained a Jesuit priest in 1879. [See, for instance, Hirshson, pp. 362–368, 387]

In 1853, Sherman resigned his Captaincy and became president of a bank in San Francisco. He returned to San Francisco at a time of great turmoil in the West. He survived two shipwrecks and floated through the Golden Gate on the overturned hull of a foundering lumber schooner. [Sherman, "Memoirs", pp. 125–129] Sherman eventually suffered from stress-related asthma because of the city's brutal financial climate. [Sherman, "Memoirs", pp. 131–134, 166] Late in life, regarding his time in real-estate-speculation-mad San Francisco, Sherman recalled: "I can handle a hundred thousand men in battle, and take the City of the Sun, but am afraid to manage a lot in the swamp of San Francisco." [Quoted in Royster, pp. 133–134] In 1856, he served as a major general of the California militia.

Sherman's bank failed during the financial Panic of 1857 and he turned to the practice of law in Leavenworth, Kansas, at which he was also unsuccessful. [Sherman, "Memoirs", p. 158–160]

University superintendent

In 1859, Sherman accepted a job as the first superintendent of the Louisiana State Seminary of Learning & Military Academy in Pineville, Louisiana, a position offered to him by Major D. C. Buell and General G. Mason Graham. [Sherman, "Memoirs", Chap. VI] He proved an effective and popular leader of that institution, which would later become Louisiana State University (LSU). Colonel Joseph P. Taylor, the brother of the late President Zachary Taylor, declared that "if you had hunted the whole army, from one end of it to the other, you could not have found a man in it more admirably suited for the position in every respect than Sherman." [ Quoted in Hirshson, p. 68]

On hearing of South Carolina's secession from the United States, Sherman observed to a close friend, Professor David F. Boyd of Virginia, an enthusiastic secessionist, almost perfectly describing the four years of war to come:

In January 1861 just before the outbreak of the Civil War, Sherman was required to accept receipt of arms surrendered to the State Militia by the U.S. Arsenal at Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Instead of complying, he resigned his position as superintendent and returned to the North, declaring to the governor of Louisiana, "On no earthly account will I do any act or think any thought hostile ... to the ... United States." [Letter by W.T. Sherman to Gov. Thomas O. Moore, January 18, 1861. Quoted in Sherman, "Memoirs", p. 156] He promptly traveled to Washington, D.C., possibly in the hope of securing a position in the army, and met with Abraham Lincoln in the White House during inauguration week. Sherman expressed concern about the North's poor state of preparedness but found Lincoln unresponsive. [Sherman, "Memoirs", pp. 184-86.] Thereafter, Sherman became president of the St. Louis Railroad, a streetcar company, a position he held for only a few months before being called to Washington, D.C.

Following the war, General Sherman donated two cannons to the institution. These cannons had been captured from Confederate forces and had been used to start the war when fired at Fort Sumter, South Carolina. They are still currently on display in front of LSU's Military Science building. [ [http://appl003.lsu.edu/artsci/milscience.nsf/$Content/Unit+History?OpenDocument Department of Military Science: Unit History ] ]

Civil War service

Army commission

Sherman accepted a commission as a colonel in the 13th U.S. Infantry regiment, effective May 14, 1861. He was one of the few Union officers to distinguish himself at the First Battle of Bull Run on July 21, 1861, where he was grazed by bullets in the knee and shoulder. The disastrous Union defeat led Sherman to question his own judgment as an officer and the capacities of his volunteer troops. President Lincoln, however, promoted him to brigadier general of volunteers (effective May 17, 1861, which made him senior in rank to Ulysses S. Grant, his future commander). [See, for instance, Hirshson, pp. 90–94] He was assigned to serve under Robert Anderson in the Department of the Cumberland in Louisville, Kentucky, and succeeded Anderson in command of the department in the fall.

Breakdown and Shiloh

During his time in Louisville, Sherman became increasingly pessimistic about the outlook of the war. His frequent complaints to Washington, D.C. about shortages and his exaggerated estimates of the strength of the rebel forces caused the local press to describe him as "crazy". [See, for instance, Marszalek, "Sherman", p. 162] He was replaced in his command by Don Carlos Buell and transferred to St. Louis, Missouri, where in the fall of 1861 he experienced what would probably be described today as a nervous breakdown. He was put on leave and returned to Ohio to recuperate. While he was at home, his wife, Ellen, wrote to his brother Senator John Sherman seeking advice and complaining of "that melancholy insanity to which your family is subject". [Quoted in Lewis, p. 204] However, Sherman quickly recovered and returned to service under Maj. Gen. Henry W. Halleck, commander of the Department of the Missouri. Halleck's department had just won a major victory at Fort Henry, but he harbored doubts about the commander in the field, Brig. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, and his plans to capture Fort Donelson. Unbeknownst to Grant, Halleck offered several officers, including Sherman, command of Grant's army. Sherman refused, saying he preferred serving "under" Grant, even though he outranked him.Fact|date=September 2008 Sherman wrote to Grant from Paducah, Kentucky, "Command me in any way. I feel anxious about you as I know the great facilities [the Confederates] have of concentration by means of the river and railroad, but [I] have faith in you." [Smith, pp, 151–52]

After Grant was promoted to major general in command of the District of West Tennessee, Sherman served briefly as his replacement in command of the District of Cairo. He got his wish of serving under Grant when he was assigned on March 1, 1862, to the Army of West Tennessee as commander of the 5th Division. [Eicher, p. 485] His first major test under Grant was at the Battle of Shiloh. The massive Confederate attack on the morning of April 6, 1862, took most of the senior Union commanders by surprise. Sherman in particular had dismissed the intelligence reports that he had received from militia officers, refusing to believe that Confederate General Albert Sidney Johnston would leave his base at Corinth. He took no precautions beyond strengthening his picket lines, refusing to entrench, build abatis, or push out reconnaissance patrols. At Shiloh, he may have wished to avoid appearing overly alarmed in order to escape the kind of criticism he had received in Kentucky. He had written to his wife that, if he took more precautions, "they'd call me crazy again". [Daniel, p. 138]

Despite being caught unprepared by the attack, Sherman rallied his division and conducted an orderly, fighting retreat that helped avert a disastrous Union rout. Finding Grant at the end of the day sitting under an oak tree in the darkness smoking a cigar, he experienced, in his own words "some wise and sudden instinct not to mention retreat". Instead, in what would become one of the most famous conversations of the war, Sherman said simply: "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" After a puff of his cigar, Grant replied calmly: "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though." [Quoted in Walsh, pp. 77–78] Sherman would prove instrumental to the successful Union counterattack of April 7, 1862. Sherman was wounded twice—in the hand and shoulder—and had three horses shot out from under him. His performance was praised by Grant and Halleck and after the battle, he was promoted to major general of volunteers, effective May 1, 1862. [Eicher, p. 485] Beginning in late April, a Union force of 100,000 moved slowly against Corinth, under Halleck's command with Grant relegated to a hollow role as second-in-command to Halleck; Sherman commanded the division on the extreme right of the Union's right wing (under George H. Thomas).

Vicksburg and Chattanooga

Sherman developed close personal ties to Grant during the two years they served together. Shortly after the Union forces occupied Corinth on May 30, Sherman persuaded Grant not to resign from the Army, despite the serious difficulties he was having with his commander, General Halleck. Sherman offered Grant an example from his own life, "Before the battle of Shiloh, I was cast down by a mere newspaper assertion of 'crazy', but that single battle gave me new life, and I'm now in high feather." He told Grant that, if he remained in the army, "some happy accident might restore you to favor and your true place." [Smith, p. 212] The careers of both officers ascended considerably after that time. Sherman later famously declared that "Grant stood by me when I was crazy and I stood by him when he was drunk and now we stand by each other always." [Brockett, p. 175]

Sherman's military record in 1862–63 was mixed. In December 1862, forces under his command suffered a severe repulse at the Battle of Chickasaw Bayou, just north of Vicksburg, Mississippi. Soon after, his XV Corps was ordered to join Maj. Gen. John A. McClernand in his successful assault on Arkansas Post, generally regarded as a politically motivated distraction from the effort to capture Vicksburg. [Smith, p. 227] Before the Vicksburg Campaign in the spring of 1863, Sherman expressed serious reservations about the wisdom of Grant's unorthodox strategy, [To whit: an invading army may separate from its supply train and subsist by foraging. Smith, pp. 235–36] but he went on to perform well in that campaign under Grant's supervision. After the surrender of Vicksburg to the Union forces under General Grant on July 4, 1863, Sherman was given the rank of brigadier general in the regular army in addition to his rank as a major general of volunteers. Sherman's family came from Ohio to visit his camp near Vicksburg; their visit resulted in the death of his nine-year-old son, Willie, the Little Sergeant, from typhoid fever. [Sherman, "Memoirs", pp. 370-75.]

During the Battle of Chattanooga in November, Sherman, now in command of the Army of the Tennessee, quickly took his assigned target of Billy Goat Hill at the north end of Missionary Ridge, only to discover that it was not part of the ridge at all, but rather a detached spur separated from the main spine by a rock-strewn ravine. When he attempted to attack the main spine at Tunnel Hill, his troops were repeatedly repulsed by Patrick Cleburne's heavy division, the best unit in Braxton Bragg's army. [McPherson, p. 678] Sherman's effort was overshadowed by George Henry Thomas's army's successful assault on the center of the Confederate line, a movement originally intended as a diversion. Subsequently, Sherman led a column to relieve Union forces under Ambrose Burnside thought to be in peril at Knoxville and, in February 1864, led an expedition to Meridian, Mississippi, to disrupt Confederate infrastructure. [Sherman, "Memoirs", pp. 406-34; Buck T. Foster, "Sherman's Meridian Campaign" (University of Alabama Press, 2006).]

Georgia

Despite this mixed record, Sherman enjoyed Grant's confidence and friendship. When Lincoln called Grant east in the spring of 1864 to take command of all the Union armies, Grant appointed Sherman (by then known to his soldiers as "Uncle Billy") to succeed him as head of the Military Division of the Mississippi, which entailed command of Union troops in the Western Theater of the war. As Grant took overall command of the armies of the United States, Sherman wrote to him outlining his strategy to bring the war to an end concluding that "if you can whip Lee and I can march to the Atlantic I think ol' Uncle Abe will give us twenty days leave to see the young folks". [Sherman, "Memoirs", p. 589]

Sherman proceeded to invade the state of Georgia with three armies: the 60,000-strong Army of the Cumberland under George Henry Thomas, the 25,000-strong Army of the Tennessee under James B. McPherson, and the 13,000-strong Army of the Ohio under John M. Schofield. [McPherson, p. 653] He fought a lengthy campaign of maneuver through mountainous terrain against Confederate General Joseph E. Johnston's Army of Tennessee, attempting a direct assault only at the disastrous Battle of Kennesaw Mountain. In July, the cautious Johnston was replaced by the more aggressive John Bell Hood, who played to Sherman's strength by challenging him to direct battles on open ground. Meanwhile, in August, Sherman "learned that I had been commissioned a major-general in the regular army, which was unexpected, and not desired until successful in the capture of Atlanta." [Sherman, "Memoirs", p. 576. The nomination was not submitted to the Senate until December. Eicher, p. 702.]

Sherman's Atlanta Campaign concluded successfully on September 2, 1864 with the capture of the city. After ordering all civilians to leave the city, he ordered that all military and government buildings be burned, although many private homes and shops were burned as well. This was to set a precedent for future behavior by his armies. Capturing Atlanta was an accomplishment that made Sherman a household name in the North and helped ensure Lincoln's presidential re-election in November. Lincoln's electoral defeat by Democratic Party candidate George B. McClellan, the former Union army commander, had appeared likely in the summer of that year. Such an outcome would probably have meant the victory of the Confederacy, as the Democratic Party platform called for peace negotiations based on the acknowledgment of the Confederacy's independence. Thus the capture of Atlanta, coming when it did, may have been Sherman's greatest contribution to the Union cause.

After Atlanta, Sherman began his march south, declaring that he could "make Georgia howl". Initially disregarding Hood's army moving into Tennessee, he boasted that if Hood moved north he (Sherman) would "give him rations" as "my business is down south." He quickly, however, had to send an army back to deal with Hood. [Telegram by W.T. Sherman to Gen. U.S. Grant, October 9, 1864, reproduced in "Sherman's Civil War", pp. 731–732] Sherman marched with 62,000 men to the port of Savannah, Georgia, living off the land and causing, by his own estimate, more than $100 million in property damage. [Report by Maj. Gen. W.T. Sherman, January 1, 1865, quoted in Grimsley, p. 200] Sherman called this harsh tactic of material war "hard war", which is now, in modern times, known as total war. [History Channel] At the end of this campaign, known as Sherman's March to the Sea, his troops captured Savannah on December 22, 1864. Sherman then telegraphed Lincoln, offering him the city as a Christmas present.

Sherman's success in Georgia received ample coverage in the Northern press at a time when Grant seemed to be making little progress in his fight against Confederate General Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. A bill was introduced in Congress to promote Sherman to Grant's rank of lieutenant general, probably with a view towards having him replace Grant as commander of the Union Army. Sherman wrote both to his brother, Senator John Sherman, and to General Grant vehemently repudiating any such promotion. [See, for instance, See Liddell Hart, p. 354] According to a war-time account, [Brockett, p. 175 (p. 162 in 1865 edition).] it was around this time that Sherman made his memorable declaration of loyalty to Grant:

It is related that a distinguished civilian, who visited him at Savannah, desirous of ascertaining his real opinion of General Grant, began to speak of him in terms of depreciation. "It won't do; it won't do, Mr. _____," said Sherman, in his quick, nervous way; "General Grant "is a great general". I know him well. He stood by me when I was crazy, and I stood by him when he was drunk; and now, sir, we stand by each other always."

While in Savannah, Sherman also suffered the blow of learning from a newspaper that his infant son Charles Celestine had died during Sherman's march to the sea; the general had never even seen the child. [Marszalek, Sherman: A Oldier's Passion, p. 311.]

The Final Campaigns in the Carolinas

In the spring of 1865, Grant ordered Sherman to embark his army on steamers to join him against Lee in Virginia. Instead, Sherman persuaded Grant to allow him to march north through the Carolinas, destroying everything of military value along the way, as he had done in Georgia. He was particularly interested in targeting South Carolina, the first state to secede from the Union, for the effect it would have on Southern morale. His army proceeded north through South Carolina against light resistance from the troops of Confederate General Joseph E. Johnston. Upon hearing that Sherman's men were advancing on corduroy roads through the Salkehatchie swamps at a rate of a dozen miles per day, Johnston declared that "there had been no such army in existence since the days of Julius Caesar." [Quoted in McPherson, p. 727]

Sherman captured the state capital of Columbia, South Carolina on February 17, 1865. Fires began that night and by next morning, most of the central city was destroyed. The burning of Columbia has engendered controversy ever since, with some claiming the fires were accidental, others a deliberate act of vengeance, and still others that the retreating Confederates burned bales of cotton on their way out of town. Local Native American Lumbee guides helped Sherman's army cross the Lumber River through torrential rains and into North Carolina. According to Sherman, the trek across the Lumber River, and through the swamps, pocosins, and creeks of Robeson County "was the damnedest marching I ever saw". Thereafter, his troops did little damage to the civilian infrastructure, as North Carolina, unlike its southern neighbor, which was seen as a hotbed of secession, was regarded by his men to be only a reluctant Confederate state, due to its position as one of the last to join the Confederacy. In late March, Sherman briefly left his forces and traveled to City Point, Virginia, to consult with Grant. Lincoln happened to be at City Point at the same time, allowing the only three-way meeting of Lincoln, Grant, and Sherman during the war. [Sherman, "Memoirs", pp. 806-17; Donald C. Pfanz, "The Petersburg Campaign: Abraham Lincoln at City Point" (Lynchburg, VA, 1989), 1-2, 24-29, 94-95.]

Following Sherman's victory over Johnston's troops at the Battle of Bentonville, Lee's surrender to Grant at Appomattox Court House, and Lincoln's assassination, Sherman met with Johnston at Bennett Place in Durham, North Carolina to negotiate a Confederate surrender. At the insistence of Johnston and Confederate President Jefferson Davis, Sherman offered generous terms that dealt with both political and military issues. Sherman thought his terms were consistent with the views Lincoln had expressed at City Point, but the general had no authority to offer such terms from General Grant, newly installed President Andrew Johnson, or the Cabinet. The government in Washington, D.C. refused to honor the terms, precipitating a long-lasting feud between Sherman and the Secretary of War, Edwin M. Stanton. Confusion over this issue lasted until April 26, 1865, when Johnston, ignoring instructions from President Davis, agreed to purely military terms and formally surrendered his army and all the Confederate forces in the Carolinas, Georgia, and Florida, becoming the largest surrender of the American Civil War. [See, for instance, [http://www.wadehamptoncamp.org/hist-js.html "Johnston's Surrender at Bennett Place on Hillsboro Road"] ]

lavery and emancipation

Though he came to disapprove of slavery, Sherman was not an abolitionist before the war, and like many of his time and background, he did not believe in "Negro equality". [See, for instance, letter by W.T. Sherman to Salmon P. Chase, January 11, 1865, reproduced in "Sherman's Civil War", pp. 794–795, and letter by W.T. Sherman to John Sherman, Aug. 1865, quoted in Liddell Hart, p. 406] His military campaigns of 1864 and 1865 freed many slaves, who greeted him "as a second Moses or Aaron" [Letter to Chase, cited above] and joined his marches through Georgia and the Carolinas by the tens of thousands.

The fate of these refugees became a pressing military and political issue. Some abolitionists accused Sherman of doing little to alleviate the precarious living conditions of the freed slaves. [ See, for instance, Sherman, "Memoirs", vol. II, p. 247.] To address this issue, on January 12, 1865 Sherman met in Savannah with Secretary of War Stanton and with twenty local black leaders. After Sherman's departure, Garrison Frazier, a Baptist minister, declared in response to an inquiry about the feelings of the black community that

Four days later, Sherman issued his Special Field Orders, No. 15. The orders provided for the settlement of 40,000 freed slaves and black refugees on land expropriated from white landowners in South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. Sherman appointed Brig. Gen. Rufus Saxton, an abolitionist from Massachusetts who had previously directed the recruitment of black soldiers, to implement that plan. [ [http://www.history.umd.edu/Freedmen/sfo15.htm Special Field Orders, No. 15] , January 16, 1865. See also McPherson, pp. 737–739] Those orders, which became the basis of the claim that the Union government had promised freed slaves "40 acres and a mule", were revoked later that year by President Andrew Johnson.

Although the context is often overlooked, and the quotation usually chopped off, one of Sherman's most famous statements about his hard-war views arose in part from the racial attitudes summarized above. In his Memoirs, Sherman noted political pressures in 1864-1865 to encourage the escape of slaves, in part to avoid the possibility that "'able-bodied slaves will be called into the military service of the rebels.'" [Sherman, "Memoirs", pp. 728-29, quoting a December 30, 1864 letter from Henry W. Halleck.] Sherman thought concentration on such policies would have delayed the "successful end" of the war and the "liberat [ion of] "all" slaves." [Sherman, "Memoirs", p. 729.] He went on to summarize vividly his hard-war philosophy and to add, in effect, that he really did not want the help of liberated slaves in subduing the South:

Quote|My aim then was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. "Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom." I did not want them to cast in our teeth what General Hood had once done at Atlanta, that we had to call on their slaves to help us to subdue them. But, as regards kindness to the race . . ., I assert that no army ever did more for that race than the one I commanded at Savannah. [Sherman, Memoirs, 2d ed., ch. XXII, p. 729 (Lib. of America, 1990).]

trategies

General Sherman's record as a tactician was mixed, and his military legacy rests primarily on his command of logistics and on his brilliance as a strategist. The influential 20th century British military historian and theorist Basil Liddell Hart ranked Sherman as one of the most important strategists in the annals of war, along with Scipio Africanus, Belisarius, Napoleon Bonaparte, T. E. Lawrence, and Erwin Rommel. Liddell Hart credited Sherman with mastery of maneuver warfare (also known as the "indirect approach"), as demonstrated by his series of turning movements against Johnston during the Atlanta Campaign. Liddell Hart also stated that study of Sherman's campaigns had contributed significantly to his own "theory of strategy and tactics in mechanized warfare", which had in turn influenced Heinz Guderian's doctrine of "Blitzkrieg" and Rommel's use of tanks during the Second World War. [Liddell Hart, foreword to the Indiana University Press's edition of Sherman's "Memoirs" (1957). Quoted in Wilson, p. 179] Another WWII-era student of Liddell Hart's writings about Sherman was George S. Patton, who "'spent a long vacation studying Sherman's campaigns on the ground in Georgia and the Carolinas, with the aid of [LH's] book,'" and later "'carried out his [bold] plans, in super-Sherman style.'" [Hirshson, p. 393, quoting B.H. Liddell Hart, "Notes on Two Discussions with Patton, 1944," Feb. 20, 1948, GSP Papers, box 6, USMA Library.]

Sherman's greatest contribution to the war, the strategy of total warfare—endorsed by General Grant and President Lincoln—has been the subject of much controversy. Sherman himself downplayed his role in conducting total war, often saying that he was simply carrying out orders as best he could in order to fulfill his part of Grant's master plan for ending the war.

Total warfare

Like Grant, Sherman was convinced that the Confederacy's strategic, economic, and psychological ability to wage further war needed to be definitively crushed if the fighting were to end. Therefore, he believed that the North had to conduct its campaign as a war of conquest and employ scorched earth tactics to break the backbone of the rebellion, which he called "hard war".

Sherman's advance through Georgia and South Carolina was characterized by widespread destruction of civilian supplies and infrastructure. Although looting was officially forbidden, historians disagree on how well this regulation was enforced. [See, for instance, Grimsley, pp. 190–204; McPherson, pp. 712–714, 727–729.] The speed and efficiency of the destruction by Sherman's army was remarkable. The practice of bending rails around trees, leaving behind what came to be known as Sherman's neckties, made repairs difficult. Accusations that civilians were targeted and war crimes were committed on the march have made Sherman a controversial figure to this day, particularly in the South.

The damage done by Sherman was almost entirely limited to the destruction of much property. Though exact figures are not available, the loss of civilian life appears to have been very small. [See, for instance, Grimsley, p. 199] Consuming supplies, wrecking infrastructure, and undermining morale were Sherman's stated goals, and several of his Southern contemporaries noted this and commented on it. For instance, Alabama-born Major Henry Hitchcock, who served in Sherman's staff, declared that "it is a terrible thing to consume and destroy the sustenance of thousands of people", but if the scorched earth strategy served "to paralyze their husbands and fathers who are fighting ... it is mercy in the end." [Hitchcock, p. 125]

The severity of the destructive acts by Union troops was significantly greater in South Carolina than in Georgia or North Carolina. This appears to have been a consequence of the animosity among both Union soldiers and officers to the state that they regarded as the "cockpit of secession". [ See, for instance, Grimsley, pp. 200–202] One of the most serious accusations against Sherman was that he allowed his troops to burn the city of Columbia. Historian James M. McPherson, however, claims that:

Modern assessment

Atlanta to Goldsboro

After the fall of Atlanta in 1864, Sherman ordered the city's evacuation. When the city council appealed to him to rescind that order, on the grounds that it would cause great hardship to women, children, the elderly, and others who bore no responsibility for the conduct of the war, Sherman sent a response in which he sought to articulate his conviction that a lasting peace would be possible only if the Union were restored, and that he was therefore prepared to do all he could do to quash the rebellion:

Literary critic Edmund Wilson found in Sherman's "Memoirs" a fascinating and disturbing account of an "appetite for warfare" that "grows as it feeds on the South". [Wilson, p. 184] Former U.S. Defense Secretary Robert McNamara refers equivocally to the statement that "war is cruelty and you cannot refine it" in both the book "Wilson's Ghost" [McNamara and Blight, p. 130] and in his interview for the film "The Fog of War".

On the other hand, when comparing Sherman's scorched earth campaigns to the actions of the British Army during the Second Boer War (1899–1902)—another war in which civilians were targeted because of their central role in sustaining an armed resistance—South African historian Hermann Giliomee declares that it "looks as if Sherman struck a better balance than the British commanders between severity and restraint in taking actions proportional to legitimate needs". [Giliomee, p. 253] The admiration of scholars such as Victor Davis Hanson, Basil Liddell Hart, Lloyd Lewis, and John F. Marszalek for General Sherman owes much to what they see as an approach to the exigencies of modern armed conflict that was both effective and principled.

Postbellum service

In May 1865, after the major Confederate armies had surrendered, Sherman wrote in a personal letter:

In July 1865, only three months after Robert E. Lee’s surrender at Appomattox, General W. T. Sherman was put in charge of the Military Division of the Missouri, which included every territory west of the Mississippi.Sherman's main concern as commanding general was to protect the construction and operation of the railroads from attack by hostile Indians. In his campaigns against the Indian tribes, Sherman repeated his Civil War strategy by seeking not only to defeat the enemy's soldiers, but also to destroy the resources that allowed the enemy to sustain its warfare. The policies he implemented included the decimation of the buffalo, which were the primary source of food for the Plains Indians. [See Isenberg, pp. 128, 156]

The attitude of the American government against the native Americans is all in Sherman’s own words, as reported by the [http://www.independent.org/ Independent Institute] [ [http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=108 The Independent Institute] ] :

cquote|We are not going to let a few thieving, ragged Indians check and stop the progress of the railroads.... I regard the railroad as the most important element now in progress to facilitate the military interests of our Frontier

We must act with vindictive earnestness against the Sioux, even to their extermination, men, women and children. (The Sioux must) feel the superior power of the Government.

During an assault, the soldiers cannot pause to distinguish between male and female, or even discriminate as to age.

Despite his harsh treatment of the warring tribes, Sherman spoke out against the unfair way speculators and government agents treated the natives within the reservations. [See, for instance, Lewis, pp. 597–600]

On July 25, 1866, Congress created the rank of General of the Army for Grant and then promoted Sherman to lieutenant general. When Grant became president in 1869, Sherman was appointed Commanding General of the United States Army. After the death of John A. Rawlins, Sherman also served for one month as interim Secretary of War. His tenure as commanding general was marred by political difficulties, and from 1874 to 1876, he moved his headquarters to St. Louis, Missouri in an attempt to escape from them. One of his significant contributions as head of the Army was the establishment of the Command School (now the Command and General Staff College) at Fort Leavenworth.

In 1875 Sherman published his memoirs in two volumes. According to critic Edmund Wilson, Sherman

On June 19, 1879, Sherman delivered an address to the graduating class of the Michigan Military Academy, in which he may have uttered the famous phrase "War Is Hell." [Fred R. Shapiro and Joseph Epstein, eds., "The Yale Book of Quotations" (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006), 708.] On April 11, 1880, he addressed a crowd of more than 10,000 at Columbus, Ohio: "There is many a boy here today who looks on war as all glory, but, boys, it is all hell." [From transcript published in the "Ohio State Journal", August 12, 1880, reproduced in Lewis, p. 637.] In 1945, President Harry S. Truman would say: "Sherman was wrong. I'm telling you I find peace is hell." [Richard S. Kirkendall, ed., "Harry's Farewell: Interpreting and Teaching the Truman Presidency" (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1880), 63.]

Sherman stepped down as commanding general on November 1, 1883, and retired from the army on February 8, 1884. He lived most of the rest of his life in New York City. He was devoted to the theater and to amateur painting and was much in demand as a colorful speaker at dinners and banquets, in which he indulged a fondness for quoting Shakespeare. [See, for instance, Woodward] Sherman was proposed as a Republican candidate for the presidential election of 1884, but declined as emphatically as possible, saying, "If drafted, I will not run; if nominated, I will not accept; if elected, I will not serve." [Marszalek in "Encyclopedia of the American Civil War", p. 1769.] Such a categorical rejection of a candidacy is now referred to as a "Shermanesque statement".

Autobiography and memoirs

Around 1868, Sherman wrote (or at least began) a “private” recollection for his children about his life before the Civil War — identified now as his unpublished “Autobiography, 1828-1861.” This manuscript is held by the Ohio Historical Society. Much of the material in it would eventually be incorporated in revised form in his memoirs.

In 1875, ten years after the end of the Civil War, Sherman became one of the first Civil War generals to publish a memoir. [Marszalek, p. 461.] His "Memoirs of General William T. Sherman. By Himself", published by D. Appleton & Company, took the form of two volumes, beginning in 1846 (when the Mexican War began) and ending with a chapter about the “military lessons of the [civil] war” (1875 edition: [http://books.google.com/books?id=qC4OAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA2&dq=Memoirs+Sherman+599454#PPA1,M1 Volume I] ; [http://books.google.com/books?id=0C0OAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA2&dq=Sherman+Memoirs+599455#PPA1,M1 Volume II] ).The memoirs were controversial, and sparked complaints from many quarters. [Marszalek, p. 463. In 1875, Henry V. Boynton published a critical [http://books.google.com/books?id=Tx1CAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=boyton+%22sherman%27s+historical+raid%22#PPA1,M1 book-length review] of Sherman's memoirs "based upon compilations from the records of the war office." ] Grant (serving as President when Sherman’s memoirs first appeared) later remarked that others had told him that Sherman treated Grant unfairly but “when I finished the book, I found I approved every word; that . . . it was a true book, an honorable book, creditable to Sherman, just to his companions — to myself particularly so — just such a book as I expected Sherman would write.” [Extract from John Russell Young, "Around the World with General Grant", vol. II, 290-91, quoted in Sherman, "Memoirs" (Library of America ed., 1990), p. 1054.] In 1886, after the appearance of Grant’s own memoirs, Sherman brought out a “second edition, revised and corrected” of his memoirs with Appleton. The new edition added a second preface, a chapter about his life up to 1846, a chapter concerning the post-war period (ending with his 1884 retirement from the army), several appendices, portraits, improved maps, and an index (1886 edition: [http://books.google.com/books?id=Ii4OAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA1&dq=Sherman+468763 Volume I] , [http://books.google.com/books?id=gsMEAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA1&dq=Sherman+%22second+edition,+revised+and+corrected%22+Vol.+II#PPA1,M1 Volume II] ). For the most part, Sherman refused to revise his original text on the ground that “I disclaim the character of historian, but assume to be a witness on the stand before the great tribunal of history” and “any witness who may disagree with me should publish his own version of [the] facts in the truthful narration of which he is interested." However, Sherman did add the appendices, in which he published the views of some others. [1886 Preface. In one amusing change to his text, Sherman dropped the assertion that John Sutter, of gold rush fame, had become “very ‘tight’” at a Fourth of July celebration in 1848 and stated instead that Sutter “was enthusiastic.” Sherman, "Memoirs" (Library of America ed., 1990), Note on the Text, p. 1123; H.W. Brands, "The Age of Gold" (Doubleday, 2002), p. 271.]

Subsequently, Sherman shifted to the publishing house of Charles L. Webster & Co., the publisher of Grant’s memoirs. The new publishing house brought out a “third edition, revised and corrected” in 1890. This difficult-to-find edition was substantively identical to the second (except for the probable omission of Sherman's short 1875 and 1886 prefaces). [Sherman, "Memoirs" (Library of America ed., 1990), Note on the Text, p. 1123.]

Upon Sherman’s death in 1891, there were dueling new editions of his memoirs. His original publisher, Appleton, reissued the original (1875) edition of the memoirs with two new chapters about Sherman’s later years added by the journalist W. Fletcher Johnson (1891 Johnson edition: [http://books.google.com/books?id=Oi8OAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA1&dq=Sherman+Memoirs+W.+Fletcher+Johnston Volume I] , [http://books.google.com/books?id=ay4OAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Memoirs+of+General+William+T.+Sherman Volume II] ). Meanwhile, Charles L. Webster & Co. issued a “fourth edition, revised, corrected, and complete” with the text of Sherman’s second edition, a new chapter prepared under the auspices of the Sherman family bringing the general’s life from his retirement to his death and funeral, and an appreciation by politician James G. Blaine (who was related to Sherman's wife). Unfortunately, this edition omits Sherman’s prefaces to the 1875 and 1886 editions (1891 Blaine edition: [http://books.google.com/books?id=NUk-sPRJPRoC&pg=PA5&dq=Memoirs+SHerman+fourth+edition#PPA1,M1 Volume I] , [http://books.google.com/books?id=RmjWiedzvtoC&pg=PA1&dq=Memoirs+Sherman+fourth+edition+Vol.+II#PPA1,M1 Volume II] ).

In 1904 and 1913, Sherman’s youngest son (Philemon Tecumseh Sherman) republished the memoirs, ironically with Appleton (not Charles L. Webster & Co.). This was designated as a “second edition, revised and corrected.” This edition contains Sherman’s two prefaces, his 1886 text, and the materials added in the 1891 Blaine edition. Thus, this virtually invisible edition of Sherman's memoirs is actually the most comprehensive version.

There are many modern editions of Sherman’s memoirs. The edition most useful for research purposes is the 1990 Library of America version, edited by Charles Royster. It contains the entire text of Sherman’s 1886 edition, together with annotations, a note on the text, and a detailed chronology of Sherman’s life. Missing from this edition, however, is the useful biographical material contained in the 1891 Johnson and Blaine editions.

Published correspondence

Many of Sherman's official war-time letters (and other items) appear in the [http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/moa/browse.monographs/waro.html "Official Records of the War of the Rebellion"] . Some of these letters are rather personal in nature, rather than relating directly to operational activities of the army. There also are at least five published collections of Sherman correspondence:

*"Sherman's Civil War: Selected Correspondence of William T. Sherman, 1860-1865," edited by Brooks D. Simpson and Jean V. Berlin (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1999) -- a large collection of war-time letters (Nov. 1860 to May 1865).
*"Sherman at War," edited by Joseph H. Ewing (Dayton, OH: Morningside, 1992) -- approximately thirty war time letters to Sherman's father-in-law, Thomas Ewing, and one of his brothers-in-law, Philemon B. Ewing.
* [http://books.google.com/books?id=-iz2dbO65skC&printsec=frontcover&dq=home+letters+sherman+howe#PPP15,M1 "Home Letters of General Sherman,"] edited by M.A. DeWolfe Howe (New York: Charles Scribner's Son, 1909) -- edited letters to his wife, Ellen Ewing Sherman, from 1837 to 1888.
* [http://books.google.com/books?id=emFjH6bhr2EC&printsec=frontcover&dq=sherman+letters+thorndike "The Sherman Letters: Correspondence Between General Sherman and Senator Sherman from 1837 to 1891,"] edited by Rachel Sherman Thorndike (New York: Charles Scribner's Son, 1894) -- edited letters to his brother, Senator John Sherman, from 1837 to 1891.
* [http://books.google.com/books?id=fC4WAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=fleming+sherman+college+president#PPA5,M1 "General W.T. Sherman as College President,"] edited by Walter L. Fleming (Cleveland: The Arthur H. Clark Co., 1912) -- edited letters and other documents from Sherman's 1859-1861 service as superintendent of the Louisiana Seminary of Learning and Military Academy.

Death and posterity

Sherman died in New York City on February 14, 1891. On February 19, there was a funeral service held at his home there, followed by a military procession. Sherman's body was then transported to St. Louis, where another service was conducted on February 21, 1891 at a local Catholic church. His son, Thomas Ewing Sherman, a Jesuit priest, presided over his father's funeral mass. General Joseph E. Johnston, the Confederate officer who had commanded the resistance to Sherman's troops in Georgia and the Carolinas, served as a pallbearer in New York City. It was a bitterly cold day and a friend of Johnston, fearing that the general might become ill, asked him to put on his hat. Johnston famously replied: "If I were in [Sherman's] place, and he were standing in mine, he would not put on his hat." Johnston did catch a serious cold and died one month later of pneumonia. [See, for instance, Lewis, p. 652; Marszalek, pp. 495-98.]

Sherman is buried in Calvary Cemetery in St. Louis. Major memorials to Sherman include the gilded bronze equestrian statue by Augustus Saint-Gaudens at the main entrance to Central Park in New York City and [http://www.dcmemorials.com/index_indiv0000735.htm the major monument] by Carl Rohl-Smith near President's Park in Washington, D.C. Other posthumous tributes include the naming of the World War II M4 Sherman tank [The U.S. M4 tank was first given the service name General Sherman by the British] and the "General Sherman" Giant Sequoia tree, the most massive documented single-trunk tree in the world.

Some of the artistic treatments of Sherman's march are the Civil War era song "Marching Through Georgia" by Henry Clay Work, the poem [http://books.google.com/books?id=Hs0s_Cx2xlQC&pg=PA37&dq=Melville+March+to+the+Sea&sig=WAzeNpNKuA8yVNIzTAEx9BOPdAg "The March to the Sea"] by Herman Melville, the film "Sherman's March" by Ross McElwee, and E. L. Doctorow's novel "The March". At the beginning of Margaret Mitchell's novel "Gone with the Wind", first published in 1936, the fictional character Rhett Butler warns a group of upper-class secessionists of the folly of war with the North in terms very reminiscent of those Sherman directed to David F. Boyd before leaving Louisiana. Sherman's invasion of Georgia later plays a central role in the plot of the novel. Charles Beaumont in the Twilight Zone episode Long Live Walter Jameson has the lead character (a history professor) comment on the burning of Atlanta that the union soldiers did it unwillingly at the behest of a Sherman described as sullen and brutish.

ee also

*List of American Civil War generals
*Sherman's March to the Sea
*"Sherman's March" (2007 documentary)

Writings

*"General Sherman's Official Account of His Great March to Georgia and the Carolinas, from His Departure from Chattanooga to the Surrender of General Joseph E. Johnston and Confederate Forces under His Command" (1865)
*"Autobiography, 1828-1861" (circa 1868), Mss. 57, WTS Papers, Ohio Historical Society. Private recollections for Sherman's children.
*"Memoirs of General William T. Sherman, Written by Himself" (1875), 2d ed. with additional chapters (1886)
*"Reports of Inspection Made in the Summer of 1877 by Generals P. H. Sheridan and W. T. Sherman of Country North of the Union Pacific Railroad" (co-author, 1878)
* [http://books.google.com/books?id=bUUYJ9oYN7wC&printsec=frontcover&dq=sherman+letters#PPR1,M1 "The Sherman Letters: Correspondence between General and Senator Sherman from 1837 to 1891" (posthumous, 1894)]
* [http://books.google.com/books?id=-iz2dbO65skC&printsec=frontcover&dq=home+letters#PPP15,M1 "Home Letters of General Sherman" (posthumous, 1909)]
* [http://books.google.com/books?id=fC4WAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Fleming+SHerman&lr=#PPA5,M1 "General W. T. Sherman as College President: A Collection of Letters, Documents, and Other Material, Chiefly from Private Sources, Relating to the Life and Activities of General William Tecumseh Sherman, to the Early Years of Louisiana State University, and the Stirring Conditions Existing in the South on the Eve of the Civil War" (posthumous, 1912)]
*"The William Tecumseh Sherman Family Letters" (posthumous, 1967). Microfilm collection prepared by the Archives of the University of Notre Dame contains letters, etc. from Sherman, his wife, and others.
*"Sherman at War" (posthumous, 1992)
*"Sherman's Civil War: Selected Correspondence of William T. Sherman, 1860 – 1865" (posthumous, 1999)

Notes

References

* [http://books.google.com/books?id=jcxEAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=brockett+captains#PPA3,M1 Brockett, L.P., "Our Great Captains: Grant, Sherman, Thomas, Sheridan, and Farragut", C.B. Richardson, 1866.]
*Daniel, Larry J., "Shiloh: The Battle That Changed the Civil War", Simon & Schuster, 1997, ISBN 0-684-80375-5.
*Eicher, John H., & Eicher, David J., "Civil War High Commands", Stanford University Press, 2001, ISBN 0-8047-3641-3.
*Giliomee, Hermann, "The Afrikaners: Biography of a People", University Press of Virginia, 2003, ISBN 0-8139-2237-2.
*Grimsley, Mark, "The Hard Hand of War: Union Military Policy toward Southern Civilians, 1861–1865", Cambridge University Press, 1997, ISBN 0-521-59941-5.
*Hanson, Victor D., "The Soul of Battle", Anchor Books, 1999, ISBN 0-385-72059-9.
*Hirshson, Stanley P., "The White Tecumseh: A Biography of General William T. Sherman", John Wiley & Sons, 1997, ISBN 0-471-28329-0.
*Hitchcock, Henry, "Marching with Sherman: Passages from the Letters and Campaign Diaries of Henry Hitchcock, Major and Assistant Adjutant General of Volunteers, November 1864 – May 1865", ed. M.A. DeWolfe Howe, Yale University Press, 1927. Reprinted in 1995 by the University of Nebraska Press, ISBN 0-8032-7276-6.
*Isenberg, Andrew C., "The Destruction of the Bison", Cambridge University Press, 2000, ISBN 0-521-00348-2.
* [http://books.google.com/books?id=NMcEAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA482&dq=general+sherman+name+tecumseh&lr=#PPA1,M1 W. Fletcher Johnson, "Life of Wm. Tecumseh Sherman. Late General. U.S.A." (1891)] Useful 19th century biography.
*Lewis, Lloyd, "Sherman: Fighting Prophet", Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1932. Reprinted in 1993 by the University of Nebraska Press, ISBN 0-8032-7945-0.
*Liddell Hart, Basil Henry, "Sherman: Soldier, Realist, American", Dodd, Mead & Co., 1929. Reprinted in 1993 by Da Capo Press, ISBN 0-306-80507-3.
*Marszalek, John F., "Sherman: A Soldier's Passion for Order", Free Press, 1992, ISBN 0-02-920135-7; reissued with new "Preface," Southern Illinois University Press, 2007.
* Marszalek, John F., "William Tecumseh Sherman", "Encyclopedia of the American Civil War: A Political, Social, and Military History", Heidler, David S., and Heidler, Jeanne T., eds., W. W. Norton & Company, 2000, ISBN 0-393-04758-X.
*McNamara, Robert S. and Blight, James G., "Wilson's Ghost: Reducing the Risk of Conflict, Killing, and Catastrophe in the 21st Century", Public Affairs, 2001, ISBN 1-891620-89-4.
*McPherson, James M., "Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era", illustrated ed., Oxford University Press, 2003, ISBN 0-19-515901-2.
*Royster, Charles, "The Destructive War: William Tecumseh Sherman, Stonewall Jackson, and the Americans", Alfred A. Knopf, 1991, ISBN 0-679-73878-9.
*Schenker, Carl R., Jr., "'My Father . . . Named Me William "Tecumseh"': Rebutting the Charge That General Sherman Lied About His Name," "Ohio History" (2008), vol. 115, p. 55.
*"Sherman's Civil War: Selected Correspondence of William T. Sherman,1860–1865", eds. Brooks D. Simpson and J.V. Berlin, University of North Carolina Press, 1999, ISBN 0-8078-2440-2.
*Sherman, William T., " [http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/4361 Memoirs of General W.T. Sherman] ", 2nd ed., D. Appleton & Co., 1913 (1889). Reprinted by the Library of America, 1990, ISBN 978-0-94045065-3.
*"William Tecumseh Sherman", "A Dictionary of Louisiana Biography", Vol. II (1988), p. 741.
*Smith, Jean Edward, "Grant", Simon and Schuster, 2001, ISBN 0-684-84927-5.
*Walsh, George, "Whip the Rebellion", Forge Books, 2005, ISBN 0-7653-0526-7.
*Warner, Ezra J., "Generals in Blue: Lives of the Union Commanders", LSU Press, 1964, ISBN 0-8071-0822-7.
*Wilson, Edmund, "Patriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the American Civil War", Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1962. Reprinted by W. W. Norton & Co., 1994, ISBN 0-393-31256-9.
*Woodward, C. Vann, "Civil Warriors", "New York Review of Books", vol. 37, no. 17, November 8, 1990.

External links

* [http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/cg&csa/Sherman-WT.htm U.S. Army Center of Military History]
* [http://www.archives.nd.edu/findaids/ead/html/SHR.htm William T. Sherman Family papers from the University of Notre Dame]
* [http://www.sfmuseum.net/bio/sherman.html William Tecumseh Sherman] , from the [http://www.sfmuseum.net Virtual Museum of the City of San Francisco] , concentrates on Sherman's time in California
* [http://www.militarymuseum.org/sherman3.html California military history] Sherman's time in California, more info
* [http://ngeorgia.com/people/shermanwt.html General William Tecumseh Sherman] , from [http://ngeorgia.com/ About North Georgia] , concentrates on Sherman's time in Georgia
* [http://www.shermanhouse.org/ Sherman House Museum] , at Sherman's birthplace in Lancaster, Ohio
* [http://www.stlouiswalkoffame.org/inductees/william-sherman.html St. Louis Walk of Fame]
* [http://www.sonofthesouth.net/union-generals/sherman/memoirs/general-sherman-memoirs.htm Memoirs of General W. T. Sherman]
* [http://www.familytales.org/results.php?tla=wts Digitized collection of letters between William Sherman and his brother Senator John Sherman]
* [http://digital.library.villanova.edu/Sherman%20Thackara%20Collection/ Sherman Thackara Collection at the Digital Library @ Villanova University]
* [http://www.historynet.com/magazines/mhq/8250947.html William T. Sherman’s First Campaign of Destruction] Article by Buck T. Foster
*gutenberg author| id=William+T.+Sherman | name=William Tecumseh Sherman
* [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9F05E4DA1F3BE533A25756C1A9649C94609ED7CF New York Times obituary]
* [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9B01E6D91F3BE533A25753C2A9649C94609ED7CF&scp=2&sq=sherman+funeral&st=p New York Times report on NY funeral proceedings]
* [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9502EED91239E033A25751C2A9649C94609ED7CF&scp=36&sq=sherman+funeral&st=p* New York Times report on St. Louis funeral proceedings]
* [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9D04E2D81E31E033A25754C0A9629C94639ED7CF Eulogy by brother, Senator John Sherman]
*findagrave|951 Retrieved on 2007-12-13
*City of San Francisco
* [http://www.mohistory.org/files/archives_guides/Sherman.pdf William Tecumseh Sherman Collection] at Missouri History Museum Archives

Persondata
NAME=Sherman, William Tecumseh
ALTERNATIVE NAMES=Cump, Uncle Billy (nicknames)
SHORT DESCRIPTION=American General, businessman, educator, and author.
DATE OF BIRTH=February 8, 1820
PLACE OF BIRTH=Lancaster, Ohio
DATE OF DEATH=February 14, 1891
PLACE OF DEATH=New York City, New York