- Introduction to general relativity
**General relativity**(GR) is atheory ofgravitation that was developed byAlbert Einstein between 1907 and 1915. According to general relativity, the observed gravitational attraction betweenmass es results from the warping ofspace and time by those masses.Before the advent of general relativity,

Newton's law of universal gravitation had been accepted for more than two hundred years as a valid description of the gravitional force between masses. Under Newton's model, gravity was the result of an attractive force between massive objects. Although even Newton was bothered by the unknown nature of that force, the basic framework was extremely successful at describing motion.However, experiments and observations show that Einstein's description accounts for several effects that are unexplained by Newton's law, such as minute anomalies in the

orbit s of Mercury and otherplanet s. General relativity also predicts novel effects of gravity, such asgravitational wave s,gravitational lens ing and an effect of gravity ontime known asgravitational time dilation . Many of these predictions have been confirmed by experiment, while others are the subject of ongoing research. For example, although there is indirect evidence for gravitational waves, direct evidence of their existence is still being sought by several teams of scientists in experiments such as theLIGO andGEO 600 projects.General relativity has developed into an essential tool in modern

astrophysics . It provides the foundation for the current understanding ofblack holes , regions of space where gravitational attraction is so strong that not even light can escape. Their strong gravity is thought to be responsible for the intenseradiation emitted by certain types of astronomical objects (such as active galactic nuclei ormicroquasar s). General relativity is also part of the framework of the standardBig Bang model of cosmology.Although general relativity is not the only relativistic theory of gravity, it is the simplest such theory that is consistent with the experimental data. Nevertheless, a number of open questions remain: the most fundamental is how general relativity can be reconciled with the laws of quantum physics to produce a complete and self-consistent theory of

quantum gravity .**From special to general relativity**In September 1905, Einstein published his theory of

special relativity , which reconcilesNewton's laws of motion withelectrodynamics (the interaction between objects withelectric charge ). Special relativity introduced a new framework for all of physics by proposing radically new concepts ofspace andtime . Some then-accepted physical theories were inconsistent with that framework; a key example was Newton's theory ofgravity , which describes the mutual attraction experienced by bodies due to theirmass .Several physicists, including Albert Einstein, searched for a theory that would reconcile Newton's law of gravity and special relativity. Only Einstein's theory proved to be consistent with experiments and observations. To understand the theory's basic ideas, it is instructive to follow Einstein's thinking between 1907 and 1915, from his simple thought experiment involving an observer in free fall to his fully geometric theory of gravity. [

*This development is traced e.g. in Harvnb|Renn|2005|loc=p. 110ff.,in chapters 9 through 15 of Harvnb|Pais|1982, and in Harvnb|Janssen|2005. A precis of Newtonian gravity can be found in Harvnb|Schutz|2003|loc=chapters 2–4. It is impossible to say whether the problem of Newtonian gravity crossed Einstein's mind before 1907, but by his own admission, his first serious attempts to reconcile that theory with special relativity date to that year, cf. Harvnb|Pais|1982|loc=p. 178.*]**Equivalence principle**A person in a free-falling elevator experiences weightlessness during their fall, and objects either float alongside them or drift at constant speed. Since everything in the elevator is falling together, no gravitational effect can be observed. In this way, the experiences of an observer in free fall are indistinguishable from those of an observer in deep space, far from any sufficent source of gravity. Such observers are the privileged ("inertial") observers Einstein described in his theory of

special relativity : observers for whomlight travels along straight lines at constant speed. [*This is described in detail in chapter 2 of Harvnb|Wheeler|1990.*]Einstein hypothesized that the similar experiences of weightless observers and inertial observers in special relativity represented a fundamental property of gravity, and he made this the cornerstone of his theory of general relativity, formalized in his

equivalence principle . Roughly speaking, the principle states that a person in a free-falling elevator cannot tell that they are in free fall. Every experiment in such a free-falling environment has the same results as it would for an observer at rest or moving uniformly in deep space, far from all sources of gravity. [*While the equivalence principle is still part of modern expositions of general relativity, there are some differences between the modern version and Einstein's original concept, cf. Harvnb|Norton|1985.*]**Gravity and acceleration**Just as most effects of gravity can be made to vanish by observing them in free fall, the same effects can be "produced" by observing objects in an accelerated frame of reference. An observer in a closed room cannot tell which of the following is true:

* Objects are falling to the floor because the room is resting on the surface of the Earth and the objects are being pulled down by gravity.

* Objects are falling to the floor because the room is aboard a rocket in space, which is accelerating at 9.81 m/s^{2}. The objects are being pulled towards the floor by the same "inertial force" that presses the driver of an accelerating car into his seat.Conversely, any effect observed in an accelerated reference frame should also be observed in a gravitational field of corresponding strength. This principle allowed Einstein to predict several novel effects of gravity in 1907, as explained in the next section.

An observer in an accelerated reference frame must introduce what physicists call

fictitious forces to account for the acceleration experienced by himself and objects around him. One example, the force pressing the driver of an accelerating car into his or her seat, has already been mentioned; another is the force you can feel pulling your arms up and out if you attempt to spin around like a top. Einstein's key insight was that the constant, familiar pull of the earth's gravitational field is fundamentally the same as these fictitious forces. [*E. g. Harvnb|Janssen|2005|loc=p. 64f. Einstein himself also explains this in section XX of his non-technical book Einstein 1961. Following earlier ideas by*] Since fictitious forces are always proportional to theErnst Mach , Einstein also explored centrifugal forces and their gravitational analogue, cf. Harvnb|Stachel|1989.mass of the object on which they act, an object in a gravitational field should feel a gravitational force proportional to its mass, as embodied inNewton's law of gravitation .**Physical consequences**In 1907, Einstein was still eight years away from completing the general theory of relativity. Nonetheless, he was able to make a number of novel, testable predictions that were based on his starting point for developing his new theory: the equivalence principle. [

*More specifically, Einstein's calculations, which are described in chapter 11b of Harvnb|Pais|1982, use the equivalence principle, the equivalence of gravity and inertial forces, and the results of special relativity for the propagation of light and for accelerated observers (the latter by considering, at each moment, the instantaneous*]inertial frame of reference associated with such an accelerated observer).The first new effect is the

gravitational frequency shift of light. Consider two observers aboard an accelerating rocket-ship. Aboard such a ship, there is a natural concept of "up" and "down": the direction in which the ship accelerates is "up", and unattached objects accelerate in the opposite direction, falling "downward". Assume that one of the observers is "higher up" than the other. When the lower observer sends a light signal to the higher observer, the acceleration causes the light to bered-shift ed, as may be calculated fromspecial relativity ; the second observer will measure a lowerfrequency for the light than the first. Conversely, light sent from the higher observer to the lower isblue-shift ed, that is, shifted towards higher frequencies. [*This effect can be derived directly within special relativity, either by looking at the equivalent situation of two observers in an accelerated rocket-ship or by looking at a falling elevator; in both situations, the frequency shift has an equivalent description as a*] Einstein argued that such frequency shifts must be also observed in a gravitational field. This is illustrated in the figure at left, which shows a light wave that is gradually red-shifted as it works its way upwards against the gravitational acceleration. This effect has been confirmed experimentally, as described below.Doppler shift between certain inertial frames. For simple derivations of this, see Harvnb|Harrison|2002.This gravitational frequency shift corresponds to a

gravitational time dilation : Since the "higher" observer measures the same light wave to have a lower frequency than the "lower" observer, time must be passing faster for the higher observer. Thus, time runs slower for observers who are lower in a gravitational field.It is important to stress that, for each observer, there are no observable changes of the flow of time for events or processes that are at rest in his or her reference frame. Five-minute-eggs as timed by each observer's clock have the same consistency; as one year passes on each clock, each observer ages by that amount; each clock, in short, is in perfect agreement with all processes happening in its immediate vicinity. It is only when the clocks are compared between separate observers that one can notice that time runs more slowly for the lower observer than for the higher. [

*See chapter 12 of Harvnb|Mermin|2005.*] This effect is minute, but it too has been confirmed experimentally in multiple experiments, as described below.In a similar way, Einstein predicted the gravitational deflection of light: in a gravitational field, light is deflected downward. Quantitatively, his results were off by a factor of two; the correct derivation requires a more complete formulation of the theory of general relativity, not just the equivalence principle. [

*Cf. Harvnb|Ehlers|Rindler|1997; for a non-technical presentation, see Harvnb|Pössel|2007.*]**Tidal effects**The equivalence between gravitational and inertial effects does not constitute a complete theory of gravity. Notably, it does not answer the following simple question: what keeps the people on the other side of the world from falling off? When it comes to explaining gravity near our own location on the Earth's surface, noting that our reference frame is not in free fall, so that

fictitious force s are to be expected, provides a suitable explanation. But a freely falling reference frame on one side of the Earth cannot explain why the people on the opposite side of the Earth experience a gravitational pull in the opposite direction.A more basic manifestation of the same effect involves two bodies that are falling side by side towards the Earth. In a reference frame that is in free fall alongside these bodies, they appear to hover weightlessly – but not exactly so. These bodies are not falling in precisely the same direction, but towards a single point in space: namely, the Earth's center of gravity. Consequently, there is a component of each body's motion towards the other (see the figure). In a small environment such as a freely falling lift, this relative acceleration is minuscule, while for

skydiver s on opposite sides of the Earth, the effect is large. Such differences in force are also responsible for thetides in the Earth's oceans, so the term "tidal effect " is used for this phenomenon.The equivalence between inertia and gravity cannot explain tidal effects – it cannot explain variations in the gravitational field. [

*These and other tidal effects are described in Harvnb|Wheeler|1990|pp=83–91.*] For that, a theory is needed which describes the way that matter (such as the large mass of the Earth) affects the inertial environment around it.**From acceleration to geometry**In exploring the equivalence of gravity and acceleration as well as the role of tidal forces, Einstein discovered several analogies with the

geometry ofsurface s. An example is the transition from an inertial reference frame (in which free particles coast along straight paths at constant speeds) to a rotating reference frame (in which extra terms corresponding tofictitious force s have to be introduced in order to explain particle motion): this is analogous to the transition from a Cartesiancoordinate system (in which the coordinate lines are straight lines) to a curved coordinate system (where coordinate lines need not be straight).A deeper analogy relates tidal forces with a property of surfaces called "

curvature ". For gravitational fields, the absence or presence of tidal forces determines whether or not the influence of gravity can be eliminated by choosing a freely falling reference frame. Similarly, the absence or presence of curvature determines whether or not a surface is equivalent to a plane. In the summer of 1912, inspired by these analogies, Einstein searched for a geometric formulation of gravity. [*Tides and their geometric interpretation are explained in chapter 5 of Harvnb|Wheeler|1990. This part of the historical development is traced in Harvnb|Pais|1982|loc=section 12b.*]The elementary objects of

geometry – points, lines,triangle s – are traditionally defined in three-dimensionalspace or on two-dimensionalsurface s. In 1907, however, the mathematicianHermann Minkowski introduced a geometric formulation of Einstein'sspecial theory of relativity in which the geometry included not onlyspace , but alsotime . The basic entity of this new geometry is four-dimension alspacetime . The orbits of moving bodies are lines in spacetime; the orbits of bodies moving at constant speed without changing direction correspond to straight lines. [*For elementary presentations of the concept of spacetime, see the first section in chapter 2 of Harvnb|Thorne|1994, and Harvnb|Greene|2004|loc=p. 47–61. More complete treatments on a fairly elementary level can be found e.g. in Harvnb|Mermin|2005 and in Harvnb|Wheeler|1990|loc=chapters 8 and 9.*]For surfaces, the generalization from the geometry of a plane – a flat surface – to that of a general curved surface had been described in the early nineteenth century by

Carl Friedrich Gauss . This description had in turn been generalized to higher-dimensional spaces in a mathematical formalism introduced byBernhard Riemann in the 1850s. With the help ofRiemannian geometry , Einstein formulated a geometric description of gravity in which Minkowski's spacetime is replaced by distorted, curved spacetime, just as curved surfaces are a generalization of ordinary plane surfaces. [*See Harvnb|Wheeler|1990|loc=chapters 8 and 9 for vivid illustrations of curved spacetime.*]After he had realized the validity of this geometric analogy, it took Einstein a further three years to find the missing cornerstone of his theory: the equations describing how

matter influences spacetime's curvature. Having formulated what are now known asEinstein's equations (or, more precisely, his field equations of gravity), he presented his new theory of gravity at several sessions of thePrussian Academy of Sciences in late 1915. [*Einstein's struggle to find the correct field equations is traced in chapters 13–15 of Harvnb|Pais|1982.*]**Geometry and gravitation**Paraphrasing the doyen of American relativity research, John Wheeler, Einstein's geometric theory of gravity can be summarized thus: spacetime tells matter how to move; matter tells spacetime how to curve. [

*E.g. p. xi in Harvnb|Wheeler|1990.*] What this means is addressed in the following three sections, which explore the motion of so-called test particles, examine which properties of matter serve as a source for gravity, and, finally, introduce Einstein's equations, which relate these matter properties to the curvature of spacetime.**Probing the gravitational field**In order to map a body's gravitational influence, it is useful to think about what physicists call probe or

test particle s: particles that are influenced by gravity, but are so small and light that we can neglect their own gravitational effect. In the absence of gravity and other external forces, a test particle moves along a straight line at a constant speed. In the language ofspacetime , this is equivalent to saying that such test particles move along straightworld lines in spacetime. In the presence of gravity, however, spacetime isnon-Euclidean , or curved. In such a spacetime, straight world lines may not exist. Instead, test particles move along lines calledgeodesic s, which are "as straight as possible".A simple analogy is the following: In

geodesy , the science of measuring Earth's size and shape, a geodesic (from Greek "ge", Earth, and "daiein", to divide) is the shortest route between two points on the Earth's surface. Approximately, such a route is a segment of agreat circle , such as aline of longitude or theequator . These paths are certainly not straight, simply because they must follow the curvature of the Earth's surface. But they are as straight as is possible subject to this constraint.The properties of geodesics differ from those of straight lines. For example, in a plane, parallel lines never meet, but this is not so for geodesics on the surface of the Earth: for example, lines of longitude are parallel at the equator, but intersect at the poles. Analogously, the world lines of test particles in free fall are spacetime geodesics, the straightest possible lines in spacetime. But still there are crucial differences between them and the truly straight lines that can be traced out in the gravity-free spacetime of special relativity. In special relativity, parallel geodesics remain parallel. In a gravitational field with tidal effects, this will not, in general, be the case. If, for example, two bodies are initially at rest relative to each other, but are then dropped in the Earth's gravitational field, they will move towards each other as they fall towards the Earth's center. [

*A thorough, yet accessible account of basic differential geometry and its application in general relativity can be found in Harvnb|Geroch|1978.*]Compared with planets and other astronomical bodies, the objects of everyday life (people, cars, houses, even mountains) have little mass. Where such objects are concerned, the laws governing the behavior of test particles are sufficient to describe what happens. Notably, in order to deflect a test particle from its geodesic path, an external force must be applied. A person sitting on a chair is trying to follow a geodesic, that is, to fall freely towards the center of the Earth. But the chair applies an external upwards force preventing the person from falling. In this way, general relativity explains the daily experience of gravity on the surface of the Earth "not" as the downwards pull of a gravitational force, but as the upwards push of external forces. These forces deflect all bodies resting on the Earth's surface from the geodesics they would otherwise follow. [

*See chapter 10 of Harvnb|Wheeler|1990.*] For matter objects whose own gravitational influence cannot be neglected, the laws of motion are somewhat more complicated than for test particles., although it remains true that spacetime tells matter how to move. [*In fact, when starting from the complete theory, Einstein's equation can be used to derive these more complicated laws of motion for matter as a consequence of geometry; however, deriving from this the motion of idealized test particles is a highly non-trivial task, cf. Harvnb|Poisson|2004.*]**Sources of gravity**In Newton's description of gravity, the gravitational force is caused by matter. More precisely, it is caused by a specific property of material objects: their

mass . In Einstein's theory and relatedtheories of gravitation , curvature at every point in spacetime is also caused by whatever matter is present. Here, too, mass is a key property in determining the gravitational influence of matter. But in a relativistic theory of gravity, mass cannot be the only source of gravity. Relativity links mass with energy, and energy with momentum.The equivalence between mass and

energy , as expressed by the formula "E" = "mc"^{2}, is perhaps the most famous consequence of special relativity. In relativity, mass and energy are two different ways of describing one physical quantity. If a physical system has energy, it also has the corresponding mass, and vice versa. In particular, all properties of a body that are associated with energy, such as itstemperature or thebinding energy of systems such as nuclei ormolecules , contribute to that body's mass, and hence act as sources of gravity. [*A simple explanation of mass-energy-equivalence can be found in sections 3.8 and 3.9 of Harvnb|Giulini|2005.*]In special relativity, energy is closely connected to

momentum . Just as space and time are, in that theory, different aspects of a more comprehensive entity called spacetime, energy and momentum are merely different aspects of a unified, four-dimensional quantity that physicists callfour-momentum . In consequence, if energy is a source of gravity, momentum must be a source as well. The same is true for quantities that are directly related to energy and momentum, namely internalpressure and tension. Taken together, in general relativity it is mass, energy, momentum, pressure and tension that serve as sources of gravity: they are how matter tells spacetime how to curve. In the theory's mathematical formulation, all these quantities are but aspects of a more general physical quantity called the energy-momentum tensor. [*See chapter 6 of Harvnb|Wheeler|1990.*]**Einstein's equations**Einstein's equations are the centerpiece of general relativity. They provide a precise formulation of the relationship between spacetime geometry and the properties of matter, using the language of mathematics. More concretely, they are formulated using the concepts ofRiemannian geometry , in which the geometric properties of a space (or a spacetime) are described by a quantity called a metric. The metric encodes the information needed to compute the fundamental geometric notions of distance and angle in a curved space (or spacetime).A spherical surface like that of the Earth provides a simple example. The location of any point on the surface can be described by two coordinates: the geographic

latitude andlongitude . Unlike the Cartesian coordinates of the plane, coordinate differences are not the same as distances on the surface, as shown in the diagram on the right: for someone at the equator, moving 30 degrees of longitude westward (magenta line) corresponds to a distance of roughly km to mi|3300. On the other hand, someone at a latitude of 55 degrees, moving 30 degrees of longitude westward (blue line) covers a distance of merely km to mi|1900. Coordinates therefore do not provide enough information to describe the geometry of a spherical surface, or indeed the geometry of any more complicated space or spacetime. That information is precisely what is encoded in the metric, which is a function defined at each point of the surface (or space, or spacetime) and relates coordinate differences to differences in distance. All other quantities that are of interest in geometry, such as the length of any given curve, or the angle at which two curves meet, can be computed from this metric function. [*For a more detailed definition of the metric, but one that is more informal than a textbook presentation, see chapter 14.4 of Harvnb|Penrose|2004.*]The metric function and its rate of change from point to point can be used to define a geometrical quantity called the

Riemann curvature tensor , which describes exactly how the space (or spacetime) is curved at each point. In general relativity, the metric and the Riemann curvature tensor are quantities defined at each point in spacetime. As has already been mentioned, the matter content of the spacetime defines another quantity, the Energy-momentum tensor**T**, and the principle that "spacetime tells matter how to move, and matter tells spacetime how to curve" means that these quantities must be related to each other. Einstein formulated this relation by using the Riemann curvature tensor and the metric to define another geometrical quantity**G**, now called theEinstein tensor , which describes some aspects of the way spacetime is curved. "Einstein's equation" then states that

$mathbf\{G\}=frac\{8pi\; G\}\{c^4\}mathbf\{T\},$

i.e., up to a constant multiple, the quantity**G**(which measures curvature) is equated with the quantity**T**(which measures matter content). The constants involved in this equation reflect the different theories that went into its making: "G" is thegravitational constant that is already present in Newtonian gravity; "c" is thespeed of light , the key constant in special relativity; and π is one of the basic constants of geometry.This equation is often referred to in the plural as

*Einstein's equations*, since the quantities**G**and**T**are each determined by several functions of the coordinates of spacetime, and the equations equate each of these component functions. [*The geometrical meaning of Einstein's equations is explored in chapters 7 and 8 of Harvnb|Wheeler|1990; cf. box 2.6 in Harvnb|Thorne|1994. An introduction using only very simple mathematics is given in chapter 19 of Harvnb|Schutz|2003.*] A solution of these equations describes a particular geometry ofspace and time ; for example, the Schwarzschild solution describes the geometry around a spherical, non-rotating mass such as astar or ablack hole , whereas the Kerr solution describes a rotating black hole. Still other solutions can describe agravitational wave or, in the case of the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker solution, an expanding universe. The simplest solution is the uncurvedMinkowski spacetime , the spacetime described by special relativity. [*The most important solutions are listed in every textbook on general relativity; for a (technical) summary of our current understanding, see Harvnb|Friedrich|2005.*]**Experimental tests**No scientific theory is apodictically true; each is a model that must be checked by experiment. A theory is falsified if it unambiguously fails even a single experiment.

Newton's law of gravity was accepted because it accounted for the motion of planets and moons in the solar system with exquisite accuracy. However, as the precision of experimental measurements gradually improved, some discrepancies with Newton's predictions were observed. These discrepancies were accounted for in the general theory of relativity, but the predictions of that theory must also be checked with experiment. Three experimental tests were devised by Einstein himself and are now known as the classical tests of the theory:

*Newtonian gravity predicts that theorbit which a singleplanet traces around a perfectly sphericalstar should be anellipse . Einstein's theory predicts a more complicated curve: the planet behaves as if it were travelling around an ellipse, but at the same time, the ellipse as a whole is rotating slowly around the star. In the diagram on the right, the ellipse predicted by Newtonian gravity is shown in red, and part of the orbit predicted by Einstein in blue. For a planet orbiting theSun , this deviation from Newton's orbits is known as the anomalous perihelion shift. The first measurement of this effect, for the planet Mercury, dates back to 1859. The most accurate results for Mercury and for other planets to date are based on measurements which were undertaken between 1966 and 1990, usingradio telescope s. [*More precisely, these are*] General relativity predicts the correct anomalous perihelion shift for all planets where this can be measured accurately (Mercury, Venus and theVLBI measurements of planetary positions; see chapter 5 of Harvnb|Will|1993 and section 3.5 of Harvnb|Will|2006.Earth ).

*According to general relativity, light does not travel along straight lines when it propagates in a gravitational field. Instead, it is deflected in the presence of massive bodies. In particular, starlight is deflected as it passes near theSun , leading to apparent shifts of up 1.75arc second s in the stars' positions in the night sky (an arc second is equal to 1/3600 of a degree). In the framework of Newtonian gravity, a heuristic argument can be made that leads to light deflection by half that amount. The different predictions can be tested by observing stars that are close to the Sun during asolar eclipse . In this way, a British expedition to Brazil and West Africa in 1919, directed byArthur Eddington , confirmed that Einstein's prediction was correct, and the Newtonian predictions wrong. Eddington's results were not very accurate; subsequent observations of the deflection of the light of distantquasar s by the Sun, which utilize highly accurate techniques ofradio astronomy , have confirmed Eddington's results with significantly better precision (the first such measurements date from 1967, the most recent comprehensive analysis from 2004). [*For the historical measurements, see Harvnb|Hartl|2005, Harvnb|Kennefick|2005, and Harvnb|Kennefick|2007; Soldner's original derivation in the framework of Newton's theory is Harvnb|Soldner|1804. For the most precise measurements to date, see Harvnb|Bertotti|2005.*]

*Gravitational redshift was first measured in a laboratory setting in 1959 by Pound and Rebka. It is also seen in astrophysical measurements, notably for light escaping theWhite Dwarf Sirius B . The relatedgravitational time dilation effect has been measured by transportingatomic clock s to altitudes of between tens and tens of thousands of kilometers (first by Hafele and Keating in 1971; most accurately to date byGravity Probe A launched in 1976). [*See Harvnb|Kennefick|2005 and chapter 3 of Harvnb|Will|1993. For the Sirius B measurements, see Harvnb|Trimble|Barstow|2007.*] Of these tests, only the perihelion advance of Mercury was known prior to Einstein's final publication of general relativity in 1916. The subsequent experimental confirmation of his other predictions, especially the first measurements of the deflection of light by the sun in 1919, catapulted Einstein to international stardom. [*Harvnb|Pais|1982, Mercury on pp. 253–254, Einstein's rise to fame in sections 16b and 16c.*] These three experimental tests justified adopting general relativity over Newton's theory and, incidentally, over a number ofalternatives to general relativity that had been proposed.Further tests of general relativity include precision measurements of the

Shapiro effect or gravitational time delay for light, most recently in 2002 by the Cassini space probe. One set of tests focuses on effects predicted by general relativity for the behavior ofgyroscopes travelling through space. One of these effects, geodetic precession, has been tested withLunar laser ranging experiment s (high precision measurements of the orbit of theMoon ). Another, which is related to rotating masses, is calledframe-dragging . It is due to be tested by theGravity Probe B satellite experiment launched in 2004, with results expected in late 2008. [*For the Cassini measurements of the Shapiro effect, see Harvnb|Bertotti|2005. For more information about Gravity Probe B, see the Citation | title=Gravity Probe B website| url=http://einstein.stanford.edu/| accessdate=2007-06-13*]By cosmic standards, gravity throughout the solar system is weak. Since the differences between the predictions of Einstein's and Newton's theories are most pronounced when gravity is strong, physicists have long been interested in testing various relativistic effects in a setting with comparatively strong gravitational fields. This has become possible thanks to precision observations of

binary pulsar s. In such a star system, two highly compactneutron star s orbit each other. At least one of them is apulsar – an astronomical object that emits a tight beam of radiowaves. Similar to the way that the rotating beam of a lighthouse means that an observer sees the lighthouse blink, these beams strike the Earth at very regular intervals, and can be observed as a highly regular series of pulses. General relativity predicts specific deviations from the regularity of these radio pulses. For instance, at times when the radio waves pass close to the other neutron star, they should be deflected by the star's gravitational field. The observed pulse patterns are impressively close to those predicted by general relativity. [*Harvnb|Kramer|2004.*]One particular set of observations is related to eminently useful practical applications, namely to

satellite navigation system s such as theGlobal Positioning System that are used both for precise positioning andtimekeeping . Such systems rely on two sets ofatomic clocks : clocks aboard satellites orbiting the Earth, and reference clocks stationed on the Earth's surface. General relativity predicts that these two sets of clocks should tick at slightly different rates, due to their different motions (an effect already predicted by special relativity) and their different positions within the Earth's gravitational field. In order to ensure the system's accuracy, the satellite clocks are either slowed down by a relativistic factor, or that same factor is made part of the evaluation algorithm. In turn, tests of the system's accuracy (especially the very thorough measurements that are part of the definition of universal coordinated time) are testament to the validity of the relativistic predictions. [*An accessible account of relativistic effects in the global positioning system can be found in Harvnb|Ashby|2002; details are given in Harvnb|Ashby|2003.*]A number of other tests have probed the validity of various versions of the

equivalence principle ; strictly speaking, all measurements of gravitational time dilation are tests of the weak version of that principle, not of general relativity itself. So far, general relativity has passed all observational tests. [*An accessible introduction to tests of general relativity is Harvnb|Will|1993; a more technical, up-to-date account is Harvnb|Will|2006.*]**Astrophysical applications**Models based on general relativity play an important role in

astrophysics , and the success of these models is further testament to the theory's validity.**Gravitational lensing**Since light is deflected in a gravitational field, it is possible for the light of a distant object to reach an observer along two or more paths. For instance, light of a very distant object such as a

quasar can pass along one side of a massivegalaxy and be deflected slightly so as to reach an observer on Earth, while lightpassing along the opposite side of that same galaxy is deflected as well, reaching the same observer from a slightly different direction. As a result, that particular observer will see one astronomical object in two different places in the night sky. This kind of focussing is well-known when it comes tooptical lens es, and hence the corresponding gravitational effect is calledgravitational lensing . [*The geometry of such situations is explored in chapter 23 of Harvnb|Schutz|2003.*]Observational astronomy uses lensing effects as an important tool to infer properties of the lensing object. Even in cases where that object is not directly visible, the shape of a lensed image provides information about themass distribution responsible for the light deflection. In particular, gravitational lensing provides one way to measure the distribution ofdark matter , which does not give off light and can be observed only by its gravitational effects. One particularly interesting application are large-scale observations, where the lensing masses are spread out over a significant fraction of the observable universe, and can be used to obtain information about the large-scale properties and evolution of our cosmos. [*Introductions to gravitational lensing and its applications can be found on the webpages Harvnb|Newbury|1997 and Harvnb|Lochner|2007.*]**Gravitational waves**Gravitational wave s, a direct consequence of Einstein's theory are ripples in space-time, distortions of geometry which propagate at the speed of light. (They should not be confused with thegravity wave s offluid dynamics , which are a different concept.)Indirectly, the effect of gravitational waves has been detected in observations of specific binary stars. Such pairs of stars

orbit each other and, as they do so, gradually lose energy by emitting gravitational waves. For ordinary stars like our sun, this energy loss would be too small to be detectable. However, in 1974, this energy loss was observed in abinary pulsar calledPSR1913+16 . In such a system, one of the orbiting stars is a pulsar. This has two consequence: a pulsar is an extremely dense object known asneutron star , for which gravitational wave emission is much stronger than for ordinary stars. Also, a pulsar emits a narrow beam ofelectromagnetic radiation from its magnetic poles. As the pulsar rotates, its beam sweeps over the Earth, where it is seen as a regular series of radio pulses, just as a ship at sea observes regular flashes of light from the rotating light in a lighthouse. This regular pattern of radio pulses functions as a highly accurate "clock". It can be used to time the double star's orbital period, and it reacts sensitively to distortions of space-time in its immediate neighborhood.The discoverers of

PSR1913+16 , Russell Hulse and Joseph Taylor, were awarded the Nobel prize in physics in 1993. Since then, several other binary pulsars have been found. The most useful are those in which both stars are pulsars, since they provide the most accurate tests of general relativity. [*Harvnb|Schutz|2003|loc=pp. 317–321; Harvnb|Bartusiak|2000|loc=pp. 70–86.*]Currently, one major goal of research in relativity is the direct detection of gravitational waves. To this end, a number of land-based

gravitational wave detector s are in operation, and a mission to launch a space-based detector, LISA, is currently under development, with a precursor mission (LISA Pathfinder ) due for launch in late 2009. If gravitational waves are detected, they could be used to obtain information about compact objects such asneutron star s andblack holes , and also to probe the state of the earlyuniverse fractions of asecond after theBig Bang . [*The ongoing search for gravitational waves is described vividly in Harvnb|Bartusiak|2000 and in Harvnb|Blair|McNamara|1997.*]**Black holes**When mass is concentrated into a sufficiently compact region of space, general relativity predicts the formation of a

black hole – a region of space with a gravitational attraction so strong that not even light can escape. Certain types of black holes are thought to be the final state in the evolution of massivestars . On the other hand,supermassive black hole s with the mass ofmillion s or billions ofSun s are assumed to reside in the cores of most galaxies, and they play a key role in current models of how galaxies have formed over the past billions of years. [*For an overview of the history of black hole physics from its beginnings in the early twentieth century to modern times, see the very readable account by Harvnb|Thorne|1994. For an up-to-date account of the role of black holes in structure formation, see Harvnb|Springel|White|Jenkins|Frenk|2005; a brief summary can be found in the related article Harvnb|Gnedin|2005.*]Matter falling onto a compact object is one of the most efficient mechanisms for releasing

energy in the form ofradiation , and matter falling onto black holes is thought to be responsible for some of the brightest astronomical phenomena imaginable. Notable examples of great interest to astronomers arequasars and other types of active galactic nuclei. Under the right conditions, falling matter accumulating around a black hole can lead to the formation of jets, in which focused beams of matter are flung away into space at speeds near that of light . [*See chapter 8 of Harvnb|Sparke|Gallagher|2007 and Harvnb|Disney|1998. A treatment that is more thorough, yet involves only comparatively little mathematics can be found in Harvnb|Robson|1996.*]There are several properties that make black holes most promising sources of gravitational waves. One reason is that black holes are the most compact objects that can orbit each other as part of a binary system; as a result, the gravitational waves emitted by such a system are especially strong. Another reason follows from what are called black hole uniqueness theorems: over time, black holes retain only a minimal set of distinguishing features (since different hair styles are a crucial part of what gives different people their different appearances, these theorems have become known as "no hair" theorems). For instance, in the long term, the collapse of a hypothetical matter cube will not result in a cube-shaped black hole. Instead, the resulting black hole will be indistinguishable from a black hole formed by the collapse of a spherical mass, but with one important difference: in its transition to a spherical shape, the black hole formed by the collapse of a cube will emit gravitational waves. [

*An elementary introduction to the black hole uniqueness theorems can be found in Harvnb|Chrusciel|2006 and in Harvnb|Thorne|1994|loc=pp. 272–286.*]**Cosmology**One of the most important aspects of general relativity is that it can be applied to the

universe as a whole. A key point is that, on large scales, our universe appears to be constructed along very simple lines: All current observations suggest that, on average, the structure of the cosmos should be approximately the same, regardless of an observer's location or direction of observation: the universe is approximately homogeneous andisotropic . Such comparatively simple universes can be described by simple solutions of Einstein's equations. The current cosmological models of the universe are obtained by combining these simple solutions to general relativity with theories describing the properties of the universe'smatter content, namelythermodynamics , nuclear- andparticle physics . According to these models, our present universe emerged from an extremely dense high-temperature state (theBig Bang )roughly 14 billionyear s ago, and has been expanding ever since. [*Detailed information can be found in Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial and FAQ, Harvnb|Wright|2007; a very readable introduction is Harvnb|Hogan|1999. Using undergraduate mathematics but avoiding the advanced mathematical tools of general relativity, Harvnb|Berry|1989 provides a more thorough presentation.*]Einstein's equations can be generalized by adding a term called the

cosmological constant . When this term is present, empty space itself acts as a source of attractive or, unusually, repulsive gravity. Einstein originally introduced this term in his pioneering 1917 paper on cosmology, with a very specific motivation: contemporary cosmological thought held the universe to be static, and the additional term was required for constructing static model universes within the framework of general relativity. When it became apparent that the universe is not static, but expanding, Einstein was quick to discard this additional term; prematurely, as we know today: From about 1998 on, a steadily accumulating body of astronomical evidence has shown that the expansion of the universe is accelerating in a way that suggests the presence of a cosmological constant or, equivalently, of adark energy with specific properties that pervades all of space. [*Einstein's original paper is Harvnb|Einstein|1917; good descriptions of more modern developments can be found in Harvnb|Cowen|2001 and Harvnb|Caldwell|2004.*]**Modern research: general relativity and beyond**General relativity is very successful in providing a framework for accurate models which describe an impressive array of physical phenomena. On the other hand, there are many interesting open questions, and in particular, the theory as a whole is almost certainly incomplete. [

*Cf. Harvnb|Maddox|1998|loc=pp. 52–59 and 98–122; Harvnb|Penrose|2004|loc=section 34.1 and chapter 30.*]In contrast to all other modern theories of

fundamental interaction s, general relativity is a classical theory: it does not include the effects of quantum physics. The quest for a quantum version of general relativity addresses one of the most fundamental open questions in physics. While there are promising candidates for such a theory ofquantum gravity , notablystring theory andloop quantum gravity , there is at present no consistent and complete theory. It has long been hoped that a theory of quantum gravity would also eliminate another problematic feature of general relativity: the presence of spacetime singularities. These singularities are boundaries ("sharp edges") of spacetime at which geometry becomes ill-defined, with the consequence that general relativity itself loses its predictive power. Furthermore, there are so-called singularity theorems which predict that such singularities "must" exist within the universe if the laws of general relativity were to hold without any quantum modifications. The best-known examples are the singularities associated with the model universes that describe black holes and the beginning of the universe. [*With a focus on string theory, the search for quantum gravity is described in Harvnb|Greene|1999; for an account from the point of view of loop quantum gravity, see Harvnb|Smolin|2001.*]Other attempts to modify general relativity have been made in the context of

cosmology . In the modern cosmological models, most energy in the universe is in forms that have never been detected directly, namelydark energy anddark matter . There have been several controversial proposals to obviate the need for these enigmatic forms of matter and energy, by modifying the laws governing gravity and the dynamics ofcosmic expansion , for examplemodified Newtonian dynamics . [*For dark matter, see Harvnb|Milgrom|2002; for dark energy, Harvnb|Caldwell|2004.*]It is possible that another reason to modify Einstein's theory can be found much closer to home, in the shape of what is called the "Pioneer" anomaly, after the "

Pioneer 10 " and "Pioneer 11 "space probe s. Taking into account all known effects, gravitational or otherwise, it is possible to make very specific predictions for these probes' trajectories. Yet observations show ever-so-slight divergences between these predictions and the actual positions. The possibility of new physics has not been ruled out, despite thorough attempts to find more conventional explanations. [*See Harvnb|Nieto|2006.*]Beyond the challenges of quantum effects and cosmology, research on general relativity is rich with possibilities for further exploration: mathematical relativists explore the nature of singularities and the fundamental properties Einstein's equations, [

*See Harvnb|Friedrich|2005.*] ever more comprehensive computer simulations of specific spacetimes (such as those describing merging black holes) are run, [*A review of the various problems and the techniques being developed to overcome them, see Harvnb|Lehner|2002.*] and the race for the first direct detection of gravitational waves continues apace. [*See Harvnb|Bartusiak|2000 for an account up to that year; up-to-date news can be found on the websites of major detector collaborations such as [*] More than ninety years after the theory was first published, research is more active than ever. [*http://geo600.aei.mpg.de GEO 600*] and [*http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/ LIGO*] .*A good starting point for a snapshot of present-day research in relativity is the electronic review journal [*]*http://relativity.livingreviews.org Living Reviews in Relativity*] .**See also***

Introduction to special relativity

*History of general relativity

*Tests of general relativity

*Golden age of general relativity

*Numerical relativity **Notes****References*** Citation

last=Ashby

first=Neil

title=Relativity and the Global Positioning System

url=http://www.ipgp.jussieu.fr/~tarantola/Files/Professional/GPS/Neil_Ashby_Relativity_GPS.pdf

journal=Physics Today

volume=55(5)

pages=41–47

year=2002

doi=10.1063/1.1485583

* Citation

last=Ashby

first=Neil

title=Relativity in the Global Positioning System

url=http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1/index.html

journal=Living Reviews in Relativity

volume=6

year=2003

accessdate=2007-07-06

* Citation

last=Bartusiak

first= Marcia

title= Einstein's Unfinished Symphony: Listening to the Sounds of Space-Time

isbn= 978-0-425-18620-6

publisher = Berkley

year=2000

* Citation

last=Berry

first=Michael V.

title=Principles of Cosmology and Gravitation

publisher=Institute of Physics Publishing

edition=2nd

year=1989

isbn=0852740379

* Citation

last=Bertotti

first=Bruno

authorlink=Bruno Bertotti

pages=402–405

contribution=The Cassini Experiment: Investigating the Nature of Gravity

editor-last=Renn

editor-first=Jürgen

title=One hundred authors for Einstein

year=2005

publisher=Wiley-VCH

isbn=3-527-40574-7

* Citation

last=Blair

first=David

authorlink=David_Blair_(physicist)

last2=McNamara

first2=Geoff

title=Ripples on a Cosmic Sea. The Search for Gravitational Waves

year=1997

publisher=Perseus

isbn=0-7382-0137-5

* Citation

last=Caldwell

first=Robert R.

title=Dark Energy

journal=Physics World

pages=37–42

volume=17(5)

year=2004

url=http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/5/7

doi=10.1038/nature02139

* Citation

last = Chrusciel

first= Piotr

contribution = How many different kinds of black hole are there?

year = 2006

url=http://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlights/bh_uniqueness/index.html

accessdate=2007-07-15

title = [*http://www.einstein-online.info Einstein Online*]

* Citation

last=Cowen

first=Ron

title=A Dark Force in the Universe

journal=Science News

volume= 159(14)

year=2001

url=http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20010407/bob14.asp

accessdate=2007-07-15

pages=218

doi=10.2307/3981642

format=dead link|date=June 2008 –^{ [http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3ACowen+intitle%3AA+Dark+Force+in+the+Universe&as_publication=Science+News&as_ylo=2001&as_yhi=2001&btnG=Search Scholar search] }

* Citation

last=Disney

first=Michael

title=A New Look at Quasars

journal=Scientific American

volume=6

year=1998

pages=52–57

* Citation

last=Ehlers

first = Jürgen

last2= Rindler

first2=Wolfgang

authorlink2=Wolfgang Rindler

title=Local and Global Light Bending in Einstein's and other Gravitational Theories

journal=General Relativity and Gravitation

volume =29

year=1997

pages= 519–529

doi=10.1023/A:1018843001842

* Citation

last= Einstein

first=Albert

authorlink=Albert Einstein

title=Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie

year=1917

journal=Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften

pages=142

* Citation

last= Einstein

first=Albert

authorlink=Albert Einstein

title=Relativity. The special and general theory

year=1961

publisher=Crown Publishers

url=http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/5001

* Citation

last=Friedrich

first=Helmut

title=Is general relativity `essentially understood'?

journal=Annalen Phys.

volume=15

year=2005

pages=84–108

url=http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0508016

doi=10.1002/andp.200510173

* Citation

last=Geroch

first=Robert

title= General relativity from A to B

publisher=University of Chicago Press

year=1978

isbn=0-226-28864-1

* Citation

last=Giulini

first=Domenico

title=Special relativity. A first encounter

publisher=Oxford University Press

year=2005

isbn=0-19-856746-4

* Citation

last=Gnedin

first=Nickolay Y.

title=Digitizing the Universe

journal=Nature

volume=435

year=2005

pages=572–573

doi=10.1038/435572a

* Citation

last=Greene

first=Brian

authorlink=Brian Greene

title=The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory

publisher=Vintage

isbn= 0-375-70811-1

year=1999

* Citation

last=Greene

first=Brian

authorlink=Brian Greene

title=The Fabric of the Cosmos. Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality

publisher=A. A. Knopf

isbn= 0-375-41288-3

year=2004

*Citation

last = Harrison

first = David M.

year = 2002

title = A Non-mathematical Proof of Gravitational Time Dilation

url = http://www.upscale.utoronto.ca/GeneralInterest/Harrison/GenRel/TimeDilation.pdf

accessdate = 2007-05-06

*Citation

last=Hartl

first=Gerhard

contribution=The Confirmation of the General Theory of Relativity by the British Eclipse Expedition of 1919

pages=182–187

editor-last=Renn

editor-first=Jürgen

title=One hundred authors for Einstein

year=2005

publisher = Wiley-VCH

isbn=3-527-40574-7

*Citation

last=Hogan

first=Craig J.

title= The Little Book of the Big Bang. A Cosmic Primer

publisher=Springer

year=1999

isbn=0-387-98385-6

*Citation

last = Janssen

first = Michel

title = Of pots and holes: Einstein’s bumpy road to general relativity

journal = Ann. Phys. (Leipzig)

volume= 14

year = 2005

pages = 58–85

url = http://www.tc.umn.edu/~janss011/pdf%20files/potsandholes.pdf

doi = 10.1002/andp.200410130

*Citation

last=Kennefick

first=Daniel

contribution=Astronomers Test General Relativity: Light-bending and the Solar Redshift

pages=178–181

editor-last=Renn

editor-first=Jürgen

title=One hundred authors for Einstein

year=2005

publisher = Wiley-VCH

isbn=3-527-40574-7

*Citation

last=Kennefick

first=Daniel

year=2007

contribution=Not Only Because of Theory: Dyson, Eddington and the Competing Myths of the 1919 Eclipse Expedition

title=Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the History of General Relativity, Tenerife, 2005

id=arxiv|0709.0685

*Citation

last=Kramer

first=Michael

contribution=Millisecond Pulsars as Tools of Fundamental Physics

pages=33–54

editor-last=Karshenboim

editor-first=S. G.

editor-last2=Peik

editor-first2=E.

title=Astrophysics, Clocks and Fundamental Constants (Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 648)

publisher=Springer

year=2004 (E-Print at [*http://de.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0405178 astro-ph/0405178*] )

*Citation

last=Lehner

first=Luis

title=Numerical Relativity: Status and Prospects

url=http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0202055

year=2002

* Citation

editor-last=Lochner

editor-first=Jim

title = Gravitational Lensing

journal= Imagine the Universe website

publisher = NASA GSFC

url= http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/news/grav_lens.html

year=2007 | accessdate=2007-06-12

* Citation

last=Maddox

first=John

authorlink=John Maddox

title=What Remains To Be Discovered

publisher=Macmillan

year=1998

isbn=0-684-82292-X

* Citation

first=N. David

last=Mermin

authorlink=David Mermin

year=2005

title= It's About Time. Understanding Einstein's Relativity

publisher = Princeton University Press

isbn=0-691-12201-6

* Citation

first=Mordehai

last=Milgrom

title=Does dark matter really exist?

journal=Scientific American

year=2002

pages=30–37

volume=287(2)

url=http://www.sciamdigital.com/index.cfm?fa=Products.ViewIssuePreview&ARTICLEID_CHAR=724C1E4B-FFD5-46F4-963E-7610EC8B7EC&sc=I100322

* Citation

first= John D.

last=Norton

title=What was Einstein's principle of equivalence?

journal= Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

year=1985

volume= 16

pages = 203–246

accessdate = 2007-06-11

url=http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/ProfE_re-set.pdf

doi=10.1016/0039-3681(85)90002-0

* Citation

last=Newbury

first=Pete

title = Gravitational lensing webpages

url=http://www.iam.ubc.ca/~newbury/lenses/lenses.html

year=1997

accessdate = 2007-06-12

format = dead link|date=June 2008 –^{ [http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=author%3ANewbury+intitle%3AGravitational+lensing+webpages&as_publication=&as_ylo=1997&as_yhi=1997&btnG=Search Scholar search] }

* Citation

last=Nieto

first=Michael Martin

title=The quest to understand the Pioneer anomaly

journal=EurophysicsNews

volume=37(6)

year=2006

pages=30–34

url=http://www.europhysicsnews.com/full/42/article4.pdf

* Citation

last = Pais

first = Abraham

authorlink=Abraham Pais

title = 'Subtle is the Lord...' The Science and life of Albert Einstein

publisher = Oxford University Press

year = 1982

isbn = 0-19-853907-X

* Citation

last=Penrose

first=Roger

authorlink=Roger Penrose

title=The Road to Reality

publisher = A. A. Knopf

year=2004

isbn=0679454438

* Citation

last = Pössel

first = M.

year = 2007

contribution = The equivalence principle and the deflection of light

title = [*http://www.einstein-online.info Einstein Online*]

url = http://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlights/equivalence_deflection/index.html

accessdate = 2007-05-06

* Citation

last=Poisson

first=Eric

title=The Motion of Point Particles in Curved Spacetime

journal= Living Rev. Relativity

volume=7

year = 2004

url=http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2004-6

accessdate=2007-06-13

* Citation

editor-first = Jürgen | editor-last = Renn

title = Albert Einstein – Chief Engineer of the Universe: Einstein's Life and Work in Context

place = Berlin| publisher = Wiley-VCH | year = 2005| isbn = 3-527-40571-2

* Citation

last=Robson

first=Ian

title=Active galactic nuclei

publisher=John Wiley

year=1996

isbn=0471958530

* Citation

last=Schutz

first=Bernard F.

title=Gravity from the ground up

publisher=Cambridge University Press

year=2003

isbn=0-521-45506-5

* Citation

last=Smolin

first=Lee

authorlink=Lee Smolin

title=Three roads to quantum gravity

year=2001

isbn=0-465-07835-4

publisher=Basic

*Citation | last = von Soldner | first = Johann Georg | title = Ueber die Ablenkung eines Lichtstrals von seiner geradlinigen Bewegung, durch die Attraktion eines Weltkörpers, an welchem er nahe vorbei geht | journal = Berliner Astronomisches Jahrbuch | year = 1804 | pages =161–172.

* Citation

last=Sparke

first=Linda S.

last2=Gallagher

first2=John S.

title=Galaxies in the universe – An introduction

publisher = Cambridge University Press

year=2007

isbn=0521855934

* Citation

last=Springel

first=Volker

last2=White

first2=Simon D. M.

last3=Jenkins

first3=Adrian

last4=Frenk

first4=Carlos S.

title=Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars

journal=Nature

volume=435

year=2005

pages=629–636

doi=10.1038/nature03597

* Citation

last= Stachel

first=John

authorlink=John Stachel

contribution= The Rigidly Rotating Disk as the 'Missing Link in the History of General Relativity'

editor-last=Howard

editor-first= D.

editor2-last=Stachel

editor2-first=J.

title=Einstein and the History of General Relativity (Einstein Studies, Vol. 1)

publisher=Birkhäuser

isbn=0-817-63392-8

year=1989

pages=48–62

* Citation

last = Thorne

first=Kip

authorlink=Kip Thorne

year = 1994

title = Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy

publisher = W W Norton & Company

isbn = 0-393-31276-3

* Citation

last = Trimble

first= Virginia

authorlink=Virginia Trimble

last2 = Barstow

first2=Martin

contribution = Gravitational redshift and White Dwarf stars

year = 2007

url=http://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlights/redshift_white_dwarfs/index.html

accessdate=2007-06-13

title = [*http://www.einstein-online.info Einstein Online*]

* Citation

first = John A.

last = Wheeler

authorlink=John Archibald Wheeler

title = A Journey Into Gravity and Spacetime

series = Scientific American Library

place = San Francisco

isbn = 0-7167-6034-7

publisher = W. H. Freeman

year = 1990

* Citation

last=Will

first=Clifford M.

authorlink=Clifford Will

title=The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

journal = Living Rev. Relativity

volume=9

year=2006

url=http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2006-3

accessdate = 2007-06-12

* Citation

last=Will

first=Clifford M.

authorlink=Clifford Will

title = Was Einstein Right?

publisher = Oxford University Press

year = 1993

isbn=0-19-286170-0

* Citation

last=Wright

first=Ned

title=Cosmology tutorial and FAQ

year=2007

publisher=University of California at Los Angeles

accessdate=2007-06-12

url=http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm**External links***Additional resources, including more advanced material, can be found in*General relativity resources .

* [*http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8550767253417678390&hl=en Yale University Video Lecture: Special and General Relativity*] at Google Video

* [*http://www.einstein-online.info/en Einstein Online*] . Website featuring articles on a variety of aspects of relativistic physics for a general audience, hosted by theMax Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics

* [*http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/NumRelHome.html NCSA Spacetime Wrinkles*] . Website produced by thenumerical relativity group at theNational Center for Supercomputing Applications , featuring an elementary introduction to general relativity,black hole s andgravitational wave s

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*