Cultivar

Osteospermum 'Pink Whirls'
A cultivar selected for its intriguing and colourful flowers

A cultivar^{[nb 1]} is a plant or group of plants selected for desirable characteristics that can be maintained by propagation. Most cultivars have arisen in cultivation but a few are special selections from the wild. Popular ornamental garden plants like roses, camellias, daffodils, rhododendrons and azaleas are cultivars produced by careful breeding and selection for flower colour and form. Similarly the world's agricultural food crops are almost exclusively cultivars that have been selected for characters like improved yield, flavor, and resistance to disease: very few wild plants are now used as food sources. Trees used in forestry are also special selections grown for their enhanced quality and yield of timber.

Cultivars form a major part of Liberty Hyde Bailey's broader grouping, the cultigen,^[1] defined as a plant whose origin or selection is primarily due to intentional human activity.^[2] Cultivar was coined by Liberty Hyde Bailey and it is generally regarded as a portmanteau of "cultivated" and "variety", but could also be derived from "cultigen" and "variety". A cultivar is not the same as a botanical variety,^[3] and there are differences in the rules for the formation and use of the names of botanical varieties and cultivars. In recent times the naming of cultivars has been complicated by the use of statutory Plant Patents and Plant Breeders' Rights names.^[4]

The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV – French: Union internationale pour la protection des obtentions végétales) offers legal protection of plant cultivars to people or organisations who introduce new cultivars to commerce. UPOV requires that a cultivar be distinct, uniform and stable. To be distinct, it must have characteristics that easily distinguish it from any other known cultivar. To be uniform and stable, the cultivar must retain these characteristics under repeated propagation.

The naming of cultivars is an important aspect of cultivated plant taxonomy, and the correct naming of a cultivar is prescribed by the Rules and Recommendations of the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (the ICNCP, commonly known as the Cultivated Plant Code). A cultivar is given a cultivar name, which consists of the scientific Latin botanical name followed by a cultivar epithet. The cultivar epithet is usually in a vernacular language. For example, the full cultivar name of the King Edward potato is Solanum tuberosum 'King Edward'. The 'King Edward' part of the name is the cultivar epithet which, according to the Rules of the Cultivated Plant Code, is bounded by single quotation marks.^[5]

Origin of term

Liberty Hyde Bailey (1858-1954) coined the word cultigen in 1918 and the word cultivar in 1923.

Main article: Cultivated plant taxonomy

The origin of the term “cultivar” arises from the need to distinguish between wild plants and those with characteristics that have arisen in cultivation (what we now call cultigens). This distinction dates back to the Greek philosopher Theophrastus (370–285 BCE), the "Father of Botany", who was keenly aware of this difference. Botanical historian Alan Morton notes that Theophrastus in his Enquiry into Plants "had an inkling of the limits of culturally induced (phenotypic) changes and of the importance of genetic constitution" (Historia Plantarum III, 2,2 and Causa Plantarum I, 9,3).^[6]

The International Code of Botanical Nomenclature uses as its starting point for modern botanical nomenclature those Latin names that appeared in Linnaeus' publications Species Plantarum (10th ed.) and Genera Plantarum (5th ed.). In Species Plantarum, Linnaeus (1707-1778) listed all the plants known to him, either directly or from his extensive reading. He recognized the rank of varietas (in English this is the botanical "variety", a rank below that of species and subspecies) and he indicated these varieties by using letters of the Greek alphabet such as α, β, λ in front of the variety name, rather than using the abbreviation var., which is the current convention. Most of the varieties listed by Linnaeus were of “garden” origin rather than being wild plants.^[7]

Over time there was an increasing need to distinguish between plants growing in the wild, and those with variations that had been produced in cultivation. In the nineteenth century many "garden-derived" plants were given horticultural names, sometimes in Latin and sometimes in a local language. From about the 1900s plants produced in cultivation in Europe were recognised in the Scandinavian, Germanic and Slavic literature through the words stamm or sorte^[8] but these words could not be used internationally since, by international agreement, any new terms had to be based in Latin.^[9] In the twentieth century an improved international terminology was proposed for the classification and nomenclature of cultivated plants.^[10]

The word cultivar was coined in 1923 by Liberty Hyde Bailey of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium, Cornell University, New York State, when he wrote:

“

The cultigen is a species, or its equivalent, that has appeared under domestication – the plant is cultigenous. I now propose another name, cultivar, for a botanical variety, or for a race subordinate to species, that has originated under cultivation; it is not necessarily, however, referable to a recognized botanical species. It is essentially the equivalent of the botanical variety except in respect to its origin.[11]

”

In this paper Bailey used only the rank of species for the cultigen but it was clear to him that many domesticated plants were more like botanical varieties than species, and that appears to have motivated the suggestion of the new classification category cultivar, which is generally assumed to be a contraction of the words cultivated and variety. However, Bailey was never explicit about the etymology of the word, and it has been suggested that it is a contraction of the words cultigen and variety, which seems more appropriate.^[12]

The new word cultivar was promoted as ... euphonious. It is free from ambiguity. It serves a purpose.^{[8][nb 2]} Its use was subsequently recommended by the first Cultivated Plant Code, which was published in 1953, and by 1960 it had achieved wide international acceptance.^[13]

Cultigens and cultivars

Main article: Cultigen

Brassica oleracea Italica Group 'Calabrese'
Showing presentation of a Group name

The terms cultigen and cultivar may be confused with each other. Cultigen is a general-purpose term for plants that have been deliberately altered or specially selected by humans, while cultivar denotes either a rank in a cultigen classification scheme, or a cultigen taxon.^[14] Cultigens include plants with cultivar names and also those with names in the classification categories of Grex and Group. The Cultivated Plant Code states that cultigens are deliberately selected plants that may have arisen by intentional or accidental hybridization in cultivation, by selection from existing cultivated stocks, or from variants within wild populations that are maintained as recognizable entities solely by continued propagation.^[15] Included within the group of plants known as cultigens are genetically modified plants, plants with binomial Latin names that are the result of ancient human selection, and plants that have been altered by humans but which have not been given formal names.^[16] Nevertheless, almost all cultigens are cultivars.^[17]

Formal definition

Main article: International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants

The Cultivated Plant Code notes that the word cultivar is used in two different senses: first, as a classification category the cultivar is defined in Article 2 of the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (2009, 8th edition) as follows: The basic category of cultivated plants whose nomenclature is governed by this Code is the cultivar.^[18] There are two other classification categories for cultigens, the grex^[19] and the Group.^[20] The Code then defines a cultivar as a taxonomic unit within the classification category of cultivar. This is the sense of cultivar that is most generally understood and which is used as a general definition.

“

A cultivar is an assemblage of plants that (a) has been selected for a particular character or combination of characters, (b) is distinct, uniform and stable in those characters, and (c) when propagated by appropriate means, retains those characters.[21]

”

Different kinds of cultivar

A cultivar of the orchid genus Oncidium

Which plants are chosen to be named as cultivars is simply a matter of convenience as the category was created to serve the practical needs of horticulture, agriculture and forestry.^[22]

Members of a particular cultivar are not necessarily genetically identical. The Cultivated Plant Code emphasizes that different cultivated plants may be accepted as different cultivars, even if they have the same genome, while cultivated plants with different genomes may be regarded as the same cultivar. The production of cultivars generally entails considerable human involvement although in a few cases it may be as little as simply selecting variation from plants growing in the wild (whether by collecting growing tissue to propagate from or by gathering seed).^[23]

Cultivars generally occur as garden and food crops: Malus 'Granny Smith' and Malus 'Red Delicious' are cultivars of apples propagated by cuttings or grafting, Lactuca 'Red Sails' and Lactuca 'Great Lakes' are lettuce cultivars propagated by seeds. Named cultivars of Hosta and Hemerocallis plants are cultivars produced by micropropagation or division.

Clones

Main article: clone (botany)

Leucospermum 'Scarlet Ribbon'
A cross performed in Tasmania between L. glabrum and L. tottum

Cultivars that are produced asexually are genetically identical and known as clones; this includes plants propagated by division, layering, cuttings, grafts, and budding. The propagating material may be taken from a particular part of the plant, such as a lateral branch, or from a particular phase of the life cycle, such as a juvenile leaf, or from aberrant growth as occurs with witch's broom. Plants whose distinctive characters are derived from the presence of an intracellular organism may also form a cultivar provided the characters are reproduced reliably from generation to generation. Plants of the same chimera (which have mutant tissues close to normal tissue) or graft-chimeras (which have vegetative tissue from different kinds of plants and which originate by grafting) may also constitute a cultivar.^[24]

Seed-produced

Some cultivars "come true from seed", retaining their distinguishing characteristics when grown from seed. Such plants are termed a "variety", "selection" or "strain" but these are ambiguous and confusing words that are best avoided. In general cultivars grown from seeds produce highly variable seedling plants, and should not be labelled with, or sold under, the parent cultivar's name (see ^[25] an article by Tony Lord of The RHS Plant Finder).

Deliberately seed-raised cultivars can be produced by uncontrolled pollination provided the cultivar can be distinguished by one or more characters that are distinct, uniform and stable under propagation. They may be produced as “lines” that are produced by repeated self-fertilization or inbreeding or “multilines” that are made up of several closely related lines. Sometimes they are F1 hybrids which are the result of a deliberate repeatable single cross between two pure lines. A few F2 hybrid seed cultivars also exist, such as Achillea 'Summer Berries'.

Cultivars may arise as a result of 9ik9i, uuua change in ploidy level of a plant, and agamospermous plants that retain their genetic composition and characteristics under reproduction may form cultivars.^[26] Occasionally cultivars are raised from seed of a specially selected provenance – for example the seed may be taken from plants that are resistant to a particular disease.^[27]

Genetically modified

Main article: genetic engineering

Genetically modified plants with characters resulting from the deliberate implantation of genetic material from a different germplasm may form a cultivar. However, the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants notes, "In practice such an assemblage is often marketed from one or more lines or multilines that have been genetically modified. These lines or multilines often remain in a constant state of development which makes the naming of such an assemblage as a cultivar a futile exercise." ^[28] However, retired transgenic varieties such as the Fish tomato, which are no longer being developed, do not run into this obstacle and can be given a cultivar name.

Cultivar names

Viola 'Clear Crystals Apricot'
The specific epithet may be omitted from a cultivar name

Every unique cultivar has a unique name within its denomination class (which is almost always the genus). Names of cultivars are regulated by the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants, and may be registered with an International Cultivar Registration Authority (ICRA). There are separate registration authorities for different plant-groups such as roses and camellias. In addition, cultivars may be associated with commercial marketing names referred to in the Cultivated Plant Code as "trade designations" (see below).

Apple 'Sundown'
Showing use of a common name as part of the cultivar name

Presenting in text

A cultivar name consists of a botanical name (of a genus, species, infraspecific taxon, interspecific hybrid or intergeneric hybrid) followed by a cultivar epithet. The cultivar epithet is capitalised and enclosed by single quotes; it should not be italicized.^[29] It is permissible to place a cultivar epithet after a common name provided the common name is botanically unambiguous. Cultivar epithets published before 1 January 1959 were often given a Latin form and can be readily confused with the specific epithets in botanical names; after that date, newly coined cultivar epithets must be in a modern vernacular language to distinguish them from botanical epithets.^[30]

Examples of correct text presentation:

Cryptomeria japonica 'Elegans'

Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 'Aureomarginata' (pre-1959 name, Latin in form)

Chamaecyparis lawsoniana 'Golden Wonder' (post-1959 name, English language)

Pinus densiflora 'Akebono' (post-1959 name, Japanese language)

Apple 'Sundown'

Some incorrect text presentation examples:

Cryptomeria japonica "Elegans" (double quotes are unacceptable)

Berberis thunbergii cv. 'Crimson Pygmy' (this once-common usage is now unacceptable, as it is no longer correct to use "cv." in this context; Berberis thunbergii 'Crimson Pygmy' is correct)

Rosa cv. 'Peace' (this is now incorrect for two reasons: firstly, the use of "cv."; secondly, "Peace" is a trade designation or "selling name" for the cultivar R. 'Madame A. Meilland' and should therefore be printed in a different typeface from the rest of the name, without quote marks, for example: Rosa Peace.)

Group names

Main article: Cultivar group

Where several very similar cultivars exist they can be associated into a Group (formerly Cultivar-group). As Group names are used with cultivar names it is necessary to understand their way of presentation. Group names are presented in normal type and the first letter of each word capitalised as for cultivars, but they are not placed in single quotes.^[31]

Presenting in text

Brassica oleracea Capitata Group (the group of cultivars including all typical cabbages)

Brassica oleracea Botrytis Group (the group of cultivars including all typical cauliflowers)

Hydrangea macrophylla Groupe Hortensis (in French) = Hydrangea macrophylla Hortensia Group (in English)

Where cited with a cultivar name the Group should be enclosed in parentheses, as follows:

Hydrangea macrophylla (Hortensia Group) 'Ayesha' ^[32]

Legal protection of cultivars and their names

Intellectual property law
Primary rights
Copyright · authors' rights · related rights · moral rights · patent · utility model · trademark · geographical indication · trade secret
Sui generis rights
Database right · indigenous intellectual property · industrial design right · mask work · plant breeders' rights · supplementary protection certificate
Related topics
Societal views · orphan works · public domain · more
v · d · e

Further information: Plant breeders' rights and Trademarks

Since the 1990s there has been an increasing use of legal protection for newly produced cultivars. Plant breeders expect legal protection for the cultivars they produce. If other growers can immediately propagate and sell these cultivars as soon as they come on the market, the breeder's benefit is largely lost.^[33] Legal protection for cultivars is obtained through the use of Plant breeders’ rights and plant Patents but the specific legislation and procedures needed to take advantage of this protection vary from country to country.^[34]

Controversial use of legal protection for cultivars

The use of legal protection for cultivars can be controversial, particularly for food crops that are staples in developing countries,^[35] or for plants selected from the wild and propagated for sale without any additional breeding work; some people consider this practice unethical.^[36]

Trade designations and marketing names

The formal scientific name of a cultivar, like Solanum tuberosum ‘King Edward’, is a way of uniquely designating a particular kind of plant. This scientific name is in the public domain and cannot be legally protected. Plant retailers wish to maximize their share of the market and one way of doing this is to replace the cumbersome Latin scientific names on plant labels in retail outlets with appealing marketing names that are easy to use, pronounce and remember. Marketing names lie outside the scope of the Cultivated Plant Code which refers to them as "trade designations". If a retailer or wholesaler has the sole legal rights to a marketing name then that may offer a sales advantage. Plants protected by Plant breeders’ rights (PBR) may have a “true” cultivar name – the recognized scientific name in the public domain, and a “commercial synonym” an additional marketing name that is legally protected: an example would be Rosa Fascination = 'Poulmax', the ‘Poulmax’ being the true scientific name. Because a name that is attractive in one language may have less appeal in another country, a plant may be given different selling names from country to country. Quoting the original code name allows the correct identification of cultivars around the world.^[37] The peak body coordinating Plant breeders rights is the Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (Union internationale pour la protection des obtentions végétales, UPOV) and this organization maintains a database of new cultivars protected by PBR in all countries.^[38]

International Cultivar Registration Authorities

Main article: International Cultivar Registration Authority

Dahlia 'Akita'
A cultivar selected for flower form and colour

An International Cultivar Registration Authority (ICRA) is a voluntary, non-statutory organization appointed by the Commission for Nomenclature and Cultivar Registration of the International Society of Horticultural Science. ICRAs are generally formed by societies and institutions specializing in particular plant genera such as Dahlia or Rhododendron and are currently located in Europe, North America, China, India, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Puerto Rico.^[39]

Each ICRA produces an annual report and its reappointment is considered every four years. The main task is to maintain a register of the names within the group of interest and where possible this is published and placed in the public domain. One major aim is to prevent the duplication of cultivar and Group epithets within a genus, as well as ensuring that names are in accord with the latest edition of the Cultivated Plant Code. In this way, over the last 50 years or so, ICRAs have contributed to the stability of cultivated plant nomenclature. In recent times many ICRAs have also recorded trade designations and trademarks used in labelling plant material, to avoid confusion with established names.^[40]

New names and other relevant data are collected by and submitted to the ICRA and in most cases there is no cost. The ICRA then checks each new epithet to ensure that it has not been used before and that it conforms with the Cultivated Plant Code. Each ICRA also ensures that new names are formally established (i.e. published in hard copy, with a description in a dated publication). They record details about the plant, such as parentage, the names of those concerned with its development and introduction, and a basic description highlighting its distinctive characters. ICRAs are not responsible for assessing the distinctiveness of the plant in question.^[40] Most ICRAs can be contacted electronically and many maintain web sites: for an up-to-date listing.^[41]

See also

• Variety (plant)

References

1. ^ Bailey 1923, p. 113
2. ^ Spencer & Cross 2007, p. 938
3. ^ Lawrence 1953, pp. 19–20
4. ^ See [1]
5. ^ Cultivated Plant Code Article 14.1 Brickell 2009, p. 19
6. ^ Morton 1981, pp. 38–39
7. ^ Lawrence 1955, p. 177
8. ^ ^{a b} Lawrence 1955, p. 180
9. ^ Lawrence 1955, p. 181
10. ^ Lawrence 1955, pp. 179–180
11. ^ Bailey 1923, p. 113
12. ^ Trehane 2004, p. 17
13. ^ Lawrence 1960, p. 1
14. ^ Spencer, Cross & Lumley 2007, p. 54
15. ^ Cultivated Plant Code Art. 2.3 Brickell 2009, p. 1
16. ^ Spencer, Cross & Lumley 2007, p. 47
17. ^ Spencer, Cross & Lumley 2007, p. 53
18. ^ Cultivated Plant Code. Art. 2.1 Brickell 2009, p. 6
19. ^ Cultivated Plant Code. Art. 4 Brickell 2009, p. 12
20. ^ Cultivated Plant Code. Art. 3 Brickell 2009, pp. 10–12
21. ^ Cultivated Plant Code. Art. 2.2 Brickell 2009, p. 6
22. ^ Cultivated Plant Code. Preamble & Principles Brickell 2009, p. 19
23. ^ Cultivated Plant Code, Article 2.20 Brickell 2009, p. 9
24. ^ Cultivated Plant Code, Articles 2.5–2.11 Brickell 2009, pp. 6–7
25. ^ Courses / RHS Gardening
26. ^ Cultivated Plant Code, Articles 2.17–2.18 Brickell 2009, pp. 7–8
27. ^ Cultivated Plant Code, Articles 2.12–2.16 Brickell 2009, pp. 7–8
28. ^ Cultivated Plant Code, Articles 2.19 Brickell 2009, pp. 8–9
29. ^ Lawrence 1957, pp. 162–165
30. ^ Cultivated Plant Code Art. 14 Brickell 2009, p. 19
31. ^ Cultivated Plant Code Art. 3 Brickell 2009, pp. 10–12
32. ^ Cultivated Plant Code Art. 15 Brickell 2009, p. 19
33. ^ P. Gepts (2004) Who Owns Biodiversity, and How Should the Owners Be Compensated? Plant Physiology 134, pp. 1295-1307
34. ^ BSPB Plant breeding - The business and science of crop improvement British Society of Plant Breeders booklet
35. ^ Adi, A.B.C., Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology and the Fate of Poor Farmers' Agriculture. Social Science Research Network
36. ^ 'Who owns nature?' (article by nurseryman and plant hunter Michael Wickenden, published in The Plantsman)
37. ^ Spencer, Cross & Lumley 2007, pp. 76–81
38. ^ Spencer, Cross & Lumley 2007, p. 78
39. ^ Cultivated Plant Code Brickell 2009, pp. 62, 67–83
40. ^ ^{a b} See International Cultivar Registration Authorities
41. ^ Staff (2010 [last update]). "ISHS :: Commission Nomenclature and Cultivar Registration - International Cultivar Registration Authorities (ICRAs)". ishs.org. http://www.ishs.org/sci/icra.htm. Retrieved 5 March 2011. 

Footnotes

1. ^ Cultivar has two meanings as explained under Formal definition. When used in reference to a taxon, the word does not apply to an individual plant but to all those plants sharing the unique characteristics that define the cultivar.
2. ^ This ignored its prior existence as a transitive verb in Spanish, meaning to farm, to cultivate, to grow, or to practice.Online Spanish dictionary, and in Portuguese meaning to cultivate, to husband, to farm, to plant, to polish, to reclaim, to improve.Ectaco online Portuguese dictionary

Bibliography

• Bailey, Liberty Hyde (1923). "Various cultigens, and transfers in nomenclature". Gentes Herbarum 1: 113–136. 
• Brickell, Chris D. et al. (eds) (2009). "International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants (ICNCP or Cultivated Plant Code) incorporating the Rules and Recommendations for naming plants in cultivation. 8th ed., adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences International Commission for the Nomenclature of Cultivated Plants". Scripta Horticulturae (International Society of Horticultural Science) 10: 1–184. ISBN 9789066056626. http://www.actahort.org/chronica/pdf/sh_10.pdf. 
• Lawrence, George H.M. (1953). "Cultivar, Distinguished from Variety". Baileya 1: 19–20. 
• Lawrence, George H.M. (1955). "The Term and Category of Cultivar". Baileya 3: 177–181. 
• Lawrence, George H.M. (1957). "The Designation of Cultivar-names". Baileya 5: 162–165. 
• Lawrence, George H.M. (1960). "Notes on Cultivar Names". Baileya 8: 1–4. 
• Morton, Alan G. (1981). History of Botanical Science: An Account of the Development of Botany from Ancient Times to the Present Day. London: Academic Press. ISBN 0125083823. 
• Spencer, Roger; Cross, Robert; Lumley, Peter (2007). Plant names: a guide to botanical nomenclature. (3rd ed.). Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO Publishing (also Earthscan, UK.). ISBN 9780643094406. 
• Spencer, Roger D.; Cross, Robert G. (2007). "The Cultigen". Taxon 56 (3): 938. 
• Trehane, Piers (2004). "50 years of the International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants". Acta Horticulturae 634: 17–27. 

External links

• Sale point of the Latest Edition (October 2009) of The International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants
• International Cultivar Registration Authorities
• The Language of Horticulture
• Opinion piece by Tony Lord (from The Plantsman magazine)
• Hortivar - The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Horticulture Cultivars Performance Database
• UPOV Homepage