 Normalform game

In game theory, normal form is a way of describing a game. Unlike extensive form, normalform representations are not graphical per se, but rather represent the game by way of a matrix. While this approach can be of greater use in identifying strictly dominated strategies and Nash equilibria, some information is lost as compared to extensiveform representations. The normalform representation of a game includes all perceptible and conceivable strategies, and their corresponding payoffs, of each player.
In static games of complete, perfect information, a normalform representation of a game is a specification of players' strategy spaces and payoff functions. A strategy space for a player is the set of all strategies available to that player, where a strategy is a complete plan of action for every stage of the game, regardless of whether that stage actually arises in play. A payoff function for a player is a mapping from the crossproduct of players' strategy spaces to that player's set of payoffs (normally the set of real numbers, where the number represents a cardinal or ordinal utility—often cardinal in the normalform representation) of a player, i.e. the payoff function of a player takes as its input a strategy profile (that is a specification of strategies for every player) and yields a representation of payoff as its output.
Contents
An example
A normalform game Player 1 \ Player 2 Player 2 chooses left Player 2 chooses right Player 1 chooses top 4, 3 −1, −1 Player 1 chooses bottom 0, 0 3, 4 The matrix to the right is a normalform representation of a game in which players move simultaneously (or at least do not observe the other player's move before making their own) and receive the payoffs as specified for the combinations of actions played. For example, if player 1 plays top and player 2 plays left, player 1 receives 4 and player 2 receives 3. In each cell, the first number represents the payoff to the row player (in this case player 1), and the second number represents the payoff to the column player (in this case player 2).
Other representations
Often symmetric games (where the payoffs do not depend on which player chooses each action) are represented with only one payoff. This is the payoff for the row player. For example, the payoff matrices on the right and left below represent the same game.
Both players Stag Hare Stag 3, 3 0, 2 Hare 2, 0 2, 2 Just row Stag Hare Stag 3 0 Hare 2 2 Uses of normal form
Dominated strategies
The Prisoner's Dilemma Cooperate Defect Cooperate −1, −1 −5, 0 Defect 0, −5 −2, −2 The payoff matrix facilitates elimination of dominated strategies, and it is usually used to illustrate this concept. For example, in the prisoner's dilemma (to the right), we can see that each prisoner can either "cooperate" or "defect". If exactly one prisoner defects, he gets off easily and the other prisoner is locked up for good. However, if they both defect, they will both be locked up for longer. One can determine that Cooperate is strictly dominated by Defect. One must compare the first numbers in each column, in this case 0 > −1 and −2 > −5. This shows that no matter what the column player chooses, the row player does better by choosing Defect. Similarly, one compares the second payoff in each row; again 0 > −1 and −2 > −5. This shows that no matter what row does, column does better by choosing Defect. This demonstrates the unique Nash equilibrium of this game is (Defect, Defect).
Sequential games in normal form
A sequential game Left, Left Left, Right Right, Left Right, Right Top 4, 3 4, 3 −1, −1 −1, −1 Bottom 0, 0 3, 4 0, 0 3, 4 These matrices only represent games in which moves are simultaneous (or, more generally, information is imperfect). The above matrix does not represent the game in which player 1 moves first, observed by player 2, and then player 2 moves, because it does not specify each of player 2's strategies in this case. In order to represent this sequential game we must specify all of player 2's actions, even in contingencies that can never arise in the course of the game. In this game, player 2 has actions, as before, Left and Right. Unlike before he has four strategies, contingent on player 1's actions. The strategies are:
 Left if player 1 plays Top and Left otherwise
 Left if player 1 plays Top and Right otherwise
 Right if player 1 plays Top and Left otherwise
 Right if player 1 plays Top and Right otherwise
On the right is the normalform representation of this game.
General formulation
In order for a game to be in normal form, we are provided with the following data:
 There is a finite set P of players, which we label {1, 2, ..., m}
 Each player k in P has a finite number of pure strategies
A pure strategy profile is an association of strategies to players, that is an mtuple
such that
A payoff function is a functionwhose intended interpretation is the award given to a single player at the outcome of the game. Accordingly, to completely specify a game, the payoff function has to be specified for each player in the player set P= {1, 2, ..., m}.
Definition: A game in normal form is a structure
where:
is a set of players,
is an mtuple of pure strategy sets, one for each player, and
is an mtuple of payoff functions.
References
 D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole, Game Theory, MIT Press, 1991.
 LeytonBrown, Kevin; Shoham, Yoav (2008), Essentials of Game Theory: A Concise, Multidisciplinary Introduction, San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers, ISBN 9781598295931, http://www.gtessentials.org. An 88page mathematical introduction; free online at many universities.
 R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions, Dover Publications, 1989.
 Shoham, Yoav; LeytonBrown, Kevin (2009), Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, GameTheoretic, and Logical Foundations, New York: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 9780521899437, http://www.masfoundations.org. A comprehensive reference from a computational perspective; see Chapter 3. Downloadable free online.
 J. Weibull, Evolutionary Game Theory, MIT Press, 1996
 J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of games and Economic Behavior, John Wiley Science Editions, 1964. This book was initially published by Princeton University Press in 1944.
External links
Categories:
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.