Money illusion

In economics, money illusion refers to the tendency of people to think of currency in nominal, rather than real, terms. In other words, the numerical/face value (nominal value) of money is mistaken for its purchasing power (real value). This is false, as modern fiat currencies have no intrinsic value and their real value is derived from their ability to be exchanged for goods and used for payment of taxes.

The term was coined by John Maynard Keynes in the early twentieth century, and Irving Fisher wrote an important book on the subject, The Money Illusion, in 1928.^[1] The existence of money illusion is disputed by monetary economists^[who?] who contend that people act rationally (i.e. think in real prices) with regard to their wealth. Shafir, Diamond and Tversky (1997) have provided compelling empirical evidence for the existence of the effect and it has been shown to affect behaviour in a variety of experimental and real world situations.^[2]

Shafir et al.^[2] also state that money illusion influences economic behaviour in three main ways:

• Price stickiness. Money illusion has been proposed as one reason why nominal prices are slow to change even where inflation has caused real prices or costs to rise.
• Contracts and laws are not indexed to inflation as frequently as one would rationally expect.
• Social discourse, in formal media and more generally, reflects some confusion about real and nominal value.

Money illusion can also influence people's perceptions of outcomes. Experiments have shown that people generally perceive a 2% cut in nominal income as unfair, but see a 2% rise in nominal income where there is 4% inflation as fair, despite them being almost rational equivalents. However, this result is consistent with the Myopic Loss Aversion theory.^[3] Further, money illusion means nominal changes in price can influence demand even if real prices have remained constant.^[4]

Some have suggested that money illusion implies that the negative relationship between inflation and unemployment described by the Phillips curve might hold, contrary to recent macroeconomic theories such as the "expectations-augmented Phillips curve".^[5] If workers use their nominal wage as a reference point when evaluating wage offers, firms can keep real wages relatively lower in a period of high inflation as workers accept the seemingly high nominal wage increase. These lower real wages would allow firms to hire more workers in periods of high inflation.

Explanations of money illusion generally describe the phenomenon in terms of heuristics. Nominal prices provide a convenient rule of thumb for determining value and real prices are only calculated if they seem highly salient (e.g. in periods of hyperinflation or in long term contracts).

See also

Numismatics portal

• Framing (social science)
• Behavioural economics
• Homo economicus
• The Mandrake Mechanism
• Map-territory relation
• Fiscal Illusion

References

1. ^ Fisher, Irving (1928), The Money Illusion, New York: Adelphi Company 
2. ^ ^{a b} Shafir, E.; Diamond, P. A.; Tversky, A. (1997), "On Money Illusion", Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 341–374, doi:10.1162/003355397555208 
3. ^ http://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/qjecon/v110y1995i1p73-92.html
4. ^ Patinkin, 1969^{[citation needed]}
5. ^ Romer 2006, p. 252.

Further reading

• Fehr, Ernst; Tyran, Jean-Robert (2001), "Does Money Illusion Matter?", American Economic Review 91 (5): 1239–1262, doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1239, JSTOR 2677924 
• Howitt, P. (1987), "money illusion", The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 3, London: Macmillan, pp. 518–519, ISBN 0333372352 
• Weber, Bernd; Rangel, Antonio; Wibral, Matthias; Falk, Armin (2009), "The medial prefrontal cortex exhibits money illusion", PNAS 106 (13): 5025–5028, doi:10.1073/pnas.0901490106, PMC 2664018, PMID 19307555 
• Akerlof, George A.; Shiller, Robert J. (2009), Animal Spirits, Princeton University Press, pp. 41–50, http://press.princeton.edu/titles/8967.html 
• Erber, Georg (2010), The Problem of Money Illusion in Economics. In: Journal of Applied Economic Sciences. vol. 5, issue 3(13), 2010, ISSN 1667-6726, S. 196–216 (PDF-File; JAES Online).