Semantic Web

The Semantic Web is an evolving extension of the World Wide Web in which the semantics of information and services on the web is defined, making it possible for the web to understand and satisfy the requests of people and machines to use the web content. [ cite journal
last = Berners-Lee
first = Tim
coauthors = James Hendler and Ora Lassila
title = The Semantic Web
journal = Scientific American Magazine
date = May 17, 2001
url = http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-semantic-web&print=true
accessdate = 2008-03-26] cite web|url=http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/SW-FAQ|title= W3C Semantic Web Frequently Asked Questions |publisher=W3C|accessdate=2008-03-13] It derives from World Wide Web Consortium director Sir Tim Berners-Lee's vision of the Web as a universal medium for data, information, and knowledge exchange. [cite web|url=http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Activity.html|title=Semantic Web Activity Statement|publisher=W3C|accessdate=2008-03-13|date=2008-03-07|author=Herman, Ivan]

At its core, the semantic web comprises a set of design principles, [cite web|url=http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/|title=Design Issues|publisher=W3C|accessdate=2008-03-13] collaborative working groups, and a variety of enabling technologies. Some elements of the semantic web are expressed as prospective future possibilities that are yet to be implemented or realized. Other elements of the semantic web are expressed in formal specifications. [cite web|url=http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/|title=W3C Semantic Web Activity|publisher=W3C|accessdate=2008-03-13|date=2008-03-12|author=Herman, Ivan] Some of these include Resource Description Framework (RDF), a variety of data interchange formats (e.g. RDF/XML, N3, Turtle, N-Triples), and notations such as RDF Schema (RDFS) and the Web Ontology Language (OWL), all of which are intended to provide a formal description of concepts, terms, and relationships within a given knowledge domain.

Purpose

Humans are capable of using the Web to carry out tasks such as finding the Finnish word for "monkey", reserving a library book, and searching for a low price on a DVD. However, a computer cannot accomplish the same tasks without human direction because web pages are designed to be read by people, not machines. The semantic web is a vision of information that is understandable by computers, so that they can perform more of the tedious work involved in finding, sharing and combining information on the web.

Tim Berners-Lee originally expressed the vision of the semantic web as follows: [cite book
last = Berners-Lee
first = Tim
authorlink = Tim Berners-Lee
coauthors = Fischetti, Mark
title = Weaving the Web
publisher = HarperSanFrancisco
date = 1999
pages = chapter 12
isbn = 9780062515872 ]

Semantic publishing will benefit greatly from the semantic web. In particular, the semantic web is expected to revolutionize scientific publishing, such as real-time publishing and sharing of experimental data on the Internet. This simple but radical idea is now being explored by W3C HCLS group's [http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ScientificPublishingTaskForce Scientific Publishing Task Force] .

Tim Berners-Lee has further stated: [cite web
url = http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/23/business/web.php
title = A 'more revolutionary' Web
accessdate = 2006-05-24
author = Victoria Shannon
date = 2006-06-26
work = International Herald Tribune]

Relationship to the Hypertext Web

Markup

Many files on a typical computer can be loosely divided into documents and data. Documents like mail messages, reports, and brochures are read by humans.Data, like calendars, addressbooks, playlists, and spreadsheets are presented using an application program which lets them be viewed, searched and combined in many ways. Currently, the World Wide Web is based mainly on documents written in Hypertext Markup Language (HTML), a markup convention that is used for coding a body of text interspersed with multimedia objects such as images and interactive forms. Metadata tags, for example





provide a method by which computers can categorise the content of web pages.

The Semantic Web takes the concept further; it involves publishing the data in a language, Resource Description Framework (RDF), specifically for data, so that it can be categorized as human perception and be "understood" by computers. So all data is not only stored, but filed and well handled.

HTML describes documents and the links between them. RDF, by contrast, describes arbitrary things such as people, meetings, or airplane parts.

For example, with HTML and a tool to render it (perhaps Web browser software, perhaps another user agent), one can create and present a page that lists items for sale. The HTML of this catalog page can make simple, document-level assertions such as "this document's title is 'Widget Superstore'". But there is no capability within the HTML itself to assert unambiguously that, for example, item number X586172 is an Acme Gizmo with a retail price of €199, or that it is a consumer product. Rather, HTML can only say that the span of text "X586172" is something that should be positioned near "Acme Gizmo" and "€ 199", etc. There is no way to say "this is a catalog" or even to establish that "Acme Gizmo" is a kind of title or that "€ 199" is a price. There is also no way to express that these pieces of information are bound together in describing a discrete item, distinct from other items perhaps listed on the page.

Descriptive and extensible

The semantic web addresses this shortcoming, using the descriptive technologies Resource Description Framework (RDF) and Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the data-centric, customizable Extensible Markup Language (XML). These technologies are combined in order to provide descriptions that supplement or replace the content of Web documents. Thus, content may manifest as descriptive data stored in Web-accessible databases, or as markup within documents (particularly, in Extensible HTML (XHTML) interspersed with XML, or, more often, purely in XML, with layout/rendering cues stored separately). The machine-readable descriptions enable content managers to add meaning to the content, i.e. to describe the structure of the knowledge we have about that content. In this way, a machine can process knowledge itself, instead of text, using processes similar to human deductive reasoning and inference, thereby obtaining more meaningful results and facilitating automated information gathering and research by computers.

Semantic vs. non-Semantic Web

Example tags that would be used in Non-semantic web page (Web 1.0 and Web 2.0):

<item>cat</item>

A tag that would be used by Semantic web 'page'(part of Web 3.0):

<item rdf:about="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cat">Cat</item>

Relationship to Object Orientation

A number of authors highlight the similarities which the Semantic Web shares with Object Orientation. [cite web|url=http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/SE/ODSD/|title=A Semantic Web Primer for Object-Oriented Software Developers|last1=Knublauch|first1=Holger|last2=Oberle|first2=Daniel|last3=Tetlow|first3=Phil|last4=Wallace|last4=Evan|publisher=W3C|date=2006-03-09|accessdate=2008-07-30] [cite web|url=http://www.w3.org/Architecture/NOTE-ioh-arch|title=An Evaluation of the World Wide Web with respect to Engelbart's Requirements|last=Connolly|first=Daniel|publisher=W3C |date=2002-08-13|accessdate=2008-07-30 ] The idea that the Semantic Web is Object Oriented is quite obvious when you understand that when hypertext and the web was first being created in the late 1980s and early 1990s it was done so using Object Oriented Programming languagesFact|date=August 2008 such as Objective-C, Smalltalk and CORBA, in the mid-1990s this development practise was furthered with the announcement of the Enterprise Objects Framework, Portable Distributed Objects and WebObjects all by NeXT , in addition to the Component Object Model released by Microsoft. XML was then released in 1998, and RDF a year after in 1999.

Similarity to Object Orientation also came from two other routes, the first was the development of the very knowledge-centric "Hyperdocument" systems by Douglas Engelbart [cite web|url=http://www.bootstrap.org/augdocs/augment-132082.htm|title=Knowledge-Domain Interoperability and an Open Hyperdocument System|last=Engelbart|first=Douglas|publisher= [http://www.bootstrap.org/ Bootstrap Institute] |date=1990|accessdate=2008-07-30 ] , and the second comes from the usage and development of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol [cite web|url=http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/9703-web-apps-essay.html|title=From the editor... WebApps|last=Connolly|first=Dan|publisher=W3C|accessdate=2008-07-30 ] .

The object orientation in the Semantic Web is clear; both the Semantic Web and Object Oriented Programming have classes, attributes (relationships) and instances. Plus with Linked Data there are also Dereferenceable Unified Resource Identifiers which provides Data-by-reference, which you can find in every programming language in the form of Pointers (known as "Object Identifiers" in Object Oriented Programming Languages and Object Databases). Therefore the Unified Modeling Language can be a useful tool for Semantic Web development and Semantic Web integration with Object Oriented Software Development.

Skeptical reactions

Practical feasibility

Critics question the basic feasibility of a complete or even partial fulfillment of the semantic web. Some develop their critique from the perspective of human behavior and personal preferences, which ostensibly diminish the likelihood of its fulfillment (see e.g., metacrap). Other commentators object that there are limitations that stem from the current state of software engineering itself (see e.g., Leaky abstraction).

Where semantic web technologies have found a greater degree of practical adoption, it has tended to be among core specialized communities and organizations for intra-company projects.cite web
url = http://www.w3.org/2007/Talks/0424-Stavanger-IH/Slides.pdf
title = State of the Semantic Web
accessdate = 2007-07-26
author = Ivan Herman
date = 2007
work = Semantic Days 2007] The practical constraints toward adoption have appeared less challenging where domain and scope is more limited than that of the general public and the World-Wide Web.

An unrealized idea

The original 2001 Scientific American article by Berners-Lee described an expected evolution of the existing Web to a Semantic Web. [cite web|accessdate=2008-03-13|url=http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00048144-10D2-1C70-84A9809EC588EF21|title=The Semantic Web |publisher=Scientific American|date=2001-05-01|author=Berners-Lee, Tim ] Such an evolution has yet to occur. Indeed, a more recent article from Berners-Lee and colleagues stated that: "This simple idea, however, remains largely unrealized." [cite web
url = http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12614/1/Semantic_Web_Revisted.pdf
title = The Semantic Web Revisited
accessdate = 2007-04-13
author = Nigel Shadbolt, Wendy Hall, Tim Berners-Lee
date = 2006
work = IEEE Intelligent Systems]

Censorship and privacy

Enthusiasm about the semantic web could be tempered by concerns regarding censorship and privacy. For instance, text-analyzing techniques can now be easily bypassed by using other words, metaphors for instance, or by using images in place of words. An advanced implementation of the semantic web would make it much easier for governments to control the viewing and creation of online information, as this information would be much easier for an automated content-blocking machine to understand. In addition, the issue has also been raised that, with the use of FOAF files and geo location meta-data, there would be very little anonymity associated with the authorship of articles on things such as a personal blog.

Doubling output formats

Another criticism of the semantic web is that it would be much more time-consuming to create and publish content because there would need to be two formats for one piece of data: one for human viewing and one for machines. However, many web applications in development are addressing this issue by creating a machine-readable format upon the publishing of data or the request of a machine for such data. The development of microformats has been one reaction to this kind of criticism.

Specifications such as eRDF and RDFa allow arbitrary RDF data to be embedded in HTML pages. The GRDDL (Gleaning Resource Descriptions from Dialects of Language) mechanism allows existing material (including microformats) to be automatically interpreted as RDF, so publishers only need to use a single format, such as HTML.

Need

The idea of a 'semantic web' necessarily coming from some marking code other than simple HTML is built on the assumption that it is not possible for a machine to appropriately interpret code based on nothing but the order relationships of letters and words. If this is not true, then a 'semantic web' may be possible to be built on HTML alone, making a specially built 'semantic web' coding system unnecessary.

There are latent dynamic network models that can, under certain conditions, be 'trained' to appropriately 'learn' meaning based on order data, in the process 'learning' relationships with order (a kind of rudimentary working grammar). See for example latent semantic analysis.

Components

The semantic web comprises the standards and tools of XML, XML Schema, RDF, RDF Schema and OWL that are organized in the Semantic Web Stack. The [http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ OWL Web Ontology Language Overview] describes the function and relationship of each of these components of the semantic web:

* XML provides an elemental syntax for content structure within documents, yet associates no semantics with the meaning of the content contained within.
* XML Schema is a language for providing and restricting the structure and content of elements contained within XML documents.
* RDF is a simple language for expressing data models, which refer to objects ("resources") and their relationships. An RDF-based model can be represented in XML syntax.
* RDF Schema is a vocabulary for describing properties and classes of RDF-based resources, with semantics for generalized-hierarchies of such properties and classes.
* OWL adds more vocabulary for describing properties and classes: among others, relations between classes (e.g. disjointness), cardinality (e.g. "exactly one"), equality, richer typing of properties, characteristics of properties (e.g. symmetry), and enumerated classes.
* SPARQL is a protocol and query language for semantic web data sources.

Current ongoing standardizations include:
* Rule Interchange Format (RIF) as the Rule Layer of the Semantic Web Stack

The intent is to enhance the usability and usefulness of the Web and its interconnected resources through:

* servers which expose existing data systems using the RDF and SPARQL standards. Many [http://esw.w3.org/topic/ConverterToRdf converters to RDF] exist from different applications. Relational databases are an important source. The semantic web server attaches to the existing system without affecting its operation.
* documents "marked up" with semantic information (an extension of the HTML tags used in today's Web pages to supply information for Web search engines using web crawlers). This could be machine-understandable information about the human-understandable content of the document (such as the creator, title, description, etc., of the document) or it could be purely metadata representing a set of facts (such as resources and services elsewhere in the site). (Note that "anything" that can be identified with a "Uniform Resource Identifier" (URI) can be described, so the semantic web can reason about animals, people, places, ideas, etc.) Semantic markup is often generated automatically, rather than manually.
* common metadata vocabularies (ontologies) and maps between vocabularies that allow document creators to know how to mark up their documents so that agents can use the information in the supplied metadata (so that "Author" in the sense of 'the Author of the page' won't be confused with "Author" in the sense of a book that is the subject of a book review).
* automated agents to perform tasks for users of the semantic web using this data
* web-based services (often with agents of their own) to supply information specifically to agents (for example, a Trust service that an agent could ask if some online store has a history of poor service or spamming).

Projects

This section provides some "example" projects and tools, but is very incomplete. The choice of projects is somewhat arbitrary but may serve illustrative purposes.

NextBio

A database consolidating high-throughput life sciences experimental data tagged and connected via biomedical ontologies. Nextbio is accessible via a search engine interface. Researchers can contribute their findings for incorporation to the database. The database currently supports gene or protein expression data and is steadily expanding to support other biological data types.

FOAF

A popular application of the semantic web is Friend of a Friend (or FoaF), which describes relationships among people and other agents in terms of RDF.

SIOC

The SIOC Project - [http://sioc-project.org/ Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities] provides a vocabulary of terms and relationships that model web data spaces. Examples of such data spaces include, among others: discussion forums, weblogs, blogrolls / feed subscriptions, mailing lists, shared bookmarks, image galleries.

Open GUID

Aimed at providing context for the Semantic Web, [http://openguid.net/ Open GUID] maintains a global Identifier repository the linked web. Domain specific Ontologies and content publishers establish identity relationships with Open GUIDs.

SIMILE

Semantic Interoperability of Metadata and Information in unLike Environments

[http://simile.mit.edu/ SIMILE] is a joint project, conducted by the [http://libraries.mit.edu/ MIT Libraries] and [http://csail.mit.edu/ MIT CSAIL] , which seeks to enhance interoperability among digital assets, schemata/vocabularies/ontologies, meta data, and services.

Linking Open Data

The [http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData Linking Open Data project] is a community-led effort to create openly accessible, and interlinked, RDF Data on the Web. The data in question takes the form of [http://esw.w3.org/topic/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/DataSets RDF Data Sets] drawn from a broad collection of data sources. There is a focus on the Linked Data style of publishing RDF on the Web. See #Triplify for a small plugin to expose data from your Web application as Linked Data.

The project is one of several sponsored by the W3C's Semantic Web Education & Outreach Interest Group ( [http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/ SWEO] ).

Services

Notification Services

Semantic Web Ping Service

The [http://pingthesemanticweb.com/ Semantic Web Ping Service] is a notification service for the semantic web that tracks the creation and modification of RDF based data sources on the Web. It provides Web Services for loosely coupled monitoring of RDF data. In addition, it provides a breakdown of RDF data sources tracked by vocabulary that includes: SIOC, FOAF, DOAP, RDFS, and OWL.

Piggy Bank

Another freely downloadable tool is the [http://simile.mit.edu/wiki/Piggy_Bank Piggy Bank] plug-in to Firefox. Piggy Bank works by extracting or translating web scripts into RDF information and storing this information on the user’s computer. This information can then be retrieved independently of the original context and used in other contexts, for example by using Google Maps to display information. Piggy Bank works with a new service, Semantic Bank, which combines the idea of tagging information with the new web languages. Piggy Bank was developed by the [http://simile.mit.edu/ Simile Project] , which also provides [http://simile.mit.edu/wiki/RDFizers RDFizers] , tools that can be used to translate specific types of information, for example weather reports for US zip codes, into RDF. Efforts like these could ease a potentially troublesome transition between the web of today and its semantic successor.

Webepags Databases

[http://www.webepags.com/database/createtable.htm Webepags Databases] is an application that allows users to create an rdf database in the browser, without any knowledge necessary.

See also

* List of emerging technologies
* Semantic advertising
* Semantic Sensor Web
* Semantic Web Services
* Social Semantic Web
* Swoogle
* Web 3.0
* Website Parse Template
*

Notes

Further reading

*
*
*

External links

* [http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ W3C Semantic Web Activity]
* [http://semanticweb.org semanticweb.org] the Semantic Web community wiki, including descriptions of many related [http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Tools tools] , [http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Events events] , and [http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Ontologies ontologies]
* [http://infomesh.net/2001/swintro/ The Semantic Web: An Introduction]
* [http://informationr.net/ir/7-4/paper134.html Shiyong Lu, Ming Dong, and Farshad Fotouhi, “The Semantic Web: Opportunities and Challenges for Next-Generation Web Applications”, Information Research, Special Issue on the Semantic Web, 7(4), 2002.]
* [http://www.codeproject.com/KB/graphics/semwebmusic.aspx Semantic Web in c#]
* [http://obitko.com/tutorials/ontologies-semantic-web/ Introduction to Ontologies and Semantic Web]
* [http://www.gopubmed.org GoPubMed: bringing Pubmed and the semantic web together]

emantic Web Software & Demonstrations

* [http://www.iglueit.com/ iGLue] provided by in4 Ltd.
* [http://www.cklingo.com/ CK Lingo] provided by Novorum Consulting Inc.
* [http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-8246463980976635143&q=Human+Computation&ei=pcQrSMimBoKIqgPK1omyCQ&hl=en/ Human Computation Video] Luis Von Ahn presents innovative techniques to incorporate RDF info into a database of images, video or other group of data.
* [http://treemagic.org/ Open Source Semantic Tools]
* [http://wordpresshelp.org/ SWED portal] provided by WordPressHelp
* [http://www.zimesh.com/ Recommendation engine based on Semantic Web] provided by Mesh Labs
* [http://www.inform.com/ Leading semantic software for online media properties] provided by Inform Technolgies, Inc. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inform_Technologies,_Inc.]