- Combustion analysis
-
Combustion analysis is a method used in both organic chemistry and analytical chemistry to determine the elemental composition (more precisely empirical formula) of a pure organic compound by combusting the sample under conditions where the resulting combustion products can be quantitatively analyzed. Once the number of moles of each combustion product has been determined the empirical formula or a partial empirical formula of the original compound can be calculated.
Contents
History
The method was invented by Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac. Justus von Liebig studied the method while working with Gay-Lussac between 1822 and 1824 and improved the method in the following years to a level that it could used as standard procedure for organic analysis.[1]
Combustion train
A combustion train is an analytical tool for the determination of elemental composition of a chemical compound. With knowledge of elemental composition a chemical formula can be derived. The combustion train allows the determination of carbon and hydrogen in a succession of steps:
- combustion of the sample at high temperatures with copper oxide as the oxidizing agent,
- collection of the resulting gas in an anhydrous agent (magnesium perchlorate or calcium chloride) to trap generated water,
- collection of the remainder gas in a strong base (for instance potassium hydroxide) to trap generated carbon dioxide.
Analytical determination of the amounts of water and carbon dioxide produced from a known amount of sample gives the empirical formula. For every hydrogen atom in the compound 1/2 equivalent of water is produced, and for every carbon atom in the compound 1 equivalent of carbon dioxide is produced.
Nowadays, modern instruments are sufficiently automated to be able to do these analyses routinely. Samples required are also extremely small — 3 mg of sample is sufficient to give satisfactory CHN analysis.
See also
References
- ^ Frederic L. Holmes (1963). "Elementary Analysis and the Origins of Physiological Chemistry". Isis 54 (1): 50–81. doi:10.1086/349664. JSTOR 228728.
Categories:
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
