- Proteasome
Proteasomes are large
protein complex es inside alleukaryote s andarchaea , as well as in somebacteria . In eukaryotes, they are located in the nucleus and thecytoplasm .cite journal |author=Peters JM, Franke WW, Kleinschmidt JA |title=Distinct 19 S and 20 S subcomplexes of the 26 S proteasome and their distribution in the nucleus and the cytoplasm |journal=J Biol Chem |volume=269 |issue=10 |pages=7709–18 |year=1994 |month=Mar |pmid=8125997 |doi= |url=http://www.jbc.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=8125997] The main function of the proteasome is to degrade unneeded or damagedprotein s byproteolysis , achemical reaction that breakspeptide bond s.Enzyme s that carry out such reactions are calledprotease s. Proteasomes are part of a major mechanism by which cells regulate theconcentration of particular proteins and degrade misfolded proteins. The degradation process yieldspeptide s of about seven to eightamino acid s long, which can then be further degraded into amino acids and used in synthesizing new proteins.cite book |author=Lodish H, Berk A, Matsudaira P, Kaiser CA, Krieger M, Scott MP, Zipursky SL, Darnell J |title=Molecular cell biology |publisher=W.H. Freeman and CO |location=New York |year=2004 |pages=66–72 |edition=5th ed. |chapter=3 |isbn=0-7167-4366-3 |oclc= |doi= |accessdate=] Proteins are tagged for degradation by a small protein calledubiquitin . The tagging reaction is catalyzed by enzymes calledubiquitin ligase s. Once a protein is tagged with a single ubiquitin molecule, this is a signal to other ligases to attach additional ubiquitin molecules. The result is a "polyubiquitin chain" that is bound by the proteasome, allowing it to degrade the tagged protein.In structure, the proteasome is a large barrel-like complex containing a "core" of four stacked rings around a central pore. Each ring is composed of seven individual proteins. The inner two rings are made of seven "β subunits" that contain the six
protease active site s. These sites are located on the interior surface of the rings, so that the target protein must enter the central pore before it is degraded. The outer two rings each contain seven "α subunits" whose function is to maintain a "gate" through which proteins enter the barrel. These α subunits are controlled by binding to "cap" structures or "regulatory particles" that recognize polyubiquitin tags attached to protein substrates and initiate the degradation process. The overall system of ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation is known as the "ubiquitin-proteasome system".The proteasomal degradation pathway is essential for many cellular processes, including the
cell cycle , the regulation ofgene expression , and responses tooxidative stress . The importance of proteolytic degradation inside cells and the role ofubiquitin in proteolytic pathways was acknowledged in the award of the 2004Nobel Prize in Chemistry toAaron Ciechanover ,Avram Hershko andIrwin Rose .cite web |url=http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/2004/ |title=Nobel Prize Awardees in Chemistry, 2004 |accessdate=2006-12-11 |author=Nobel Prize Committee |year=2004 ]Discovery
Before the discovery of the ubiquitin proteasome system, protein degradation in cells was thought to rely mainly on
lysosome s, membrane-boundorganelle s withacid ic andprotease -filled interiors that can degrade and then recycle exogenous proteins and aged or damaged organelles. However, work by Alfred Goldberg in 1977 on ATP-dependent protein degradation inreticulocyte s, which lack lysosomes, suggested the presence of a second intracellular degradation mechanism [cite journal |author=Etlinger JD, Goldberg AL |title=A soluble ATP-dependent proteolytic system responsible for the degradation of abnormal proteins in reticulocytes |journal=Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. |volume=74 |issue=1 |pages=54–8 |year=1977 |month=Jan |pmid=264694 |pmc=393195 |doi= 10.1073/pnas.74.1.54|url=] . This was shown in 1978 to be composed of several distinct protein chains, a novelty among proteases at the time. cite journal | journal=Biochem Biophys Res Commun. | volume=81 | issue=4 | pages=1100–1105 | year=1978 | author=Ciehanover A, Hod Y, Hershko A | title=A heat-stable polypeptide component of an ATP-dependent proteolytic system from reticulocytes | pmid=666810 | doi = 10.1016/0006-291X(78)91249-4 ] Later work on modification ofhistone s led to the identification of an unexpectedcovalent modification of the histone protein by a branched bond between a histonelysine residue and the C-terminalglycine residue of the proteinubiquitin , which had no known function.cite journal | journal=Proc Natl Acad Sci USA | volume=74 | issue=3 | pages=864–8 | year=1977 | author=Goldknopf IL, Busch H | title=Isopeptide linkage between nonhistone and histone 2A polypeptides of chromosomal conjugate-protein A24 | pmid=265581 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.74.3.864 ] It was then discovered that a previously-identified protein associated with proteolytic degradation, known as ATP-dependent proteolysis factor 1 (APF-1), was the same protein as ubiquitin,cite journal | journal=Cell Death Differ | volume=12 | issue=9 | pages=1167–77 | year=2000 | author=Ciechanover A | title=Early work on the ubiquitin proteasome system, an interview with Aaron Ciechanover | pmid=16094393 | doi = 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401691 ] . Later, the ATP-dependant proteolytic complex that was responsible for ubiquitin-dependant protein degradation was discovered and was called the 26S proteasome [cite journal |author=Tanaka K, Waxman L, Goldberg AL |title=ATP serves two distinct roles in protein degradation in reticulocytes, one requiring and one independent of ubiquitin |journal=J. Cell Biol. |volume=96 |issue=6 |pages=1580–5 |year=1983 |month=Jun |pmid=6304111 |pmc=2112434 |doi= 10.1083/jcb.96.6.1580|url=http://www.jcb.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=6304111] [cite journal |author=Hough R, Pratt G, Rechsteiner M |title=Purification of two high molecular weight proteases from rabbit reticulocyte lysate |journal=J. Biol. Chem. |volume=262 |issue=17 |pages=8303–13 |year=1987 |month=Jun |pmid=3298229 |doi= |url=http://www.jbc.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=3298229] .Much of the early work leading up to the discovery of the ubiquitin proteasome system occurred in the late 1970s and early 1980s at the
Technion in the laboratory ofAvram Hershko , whereAaron Ciechanover worked as a graduate student. Hershko's year-long sabbatical in the laboratory ofIrwin Rose at theFox Chase Cancer Center provided key conceptual insights, though Rose later downplayed his role in the discovery.cite journal | journal=Cell Death Differ | volume=12 | pages=1158–1161 | year=2005 | author=Hershko A | title=Early work on the ubiquitin proteasome system, an interview with Avram Hershko | pmid=16094391 | doi = 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401709 ] The three shared the 2004Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their work in discovering this system.Although
electron microscopy data revealing the stacked-ring structure of the proteasome became available in the mid-1980s,cite journal | journal=Biochim Biophys Acta | volume=872 | issue=3 | pages=253–60 | year=1986 | author=Kopp F et al. | title=Size and shape of the multicatalytic proteinase from rat skeletal muscle | pmid=3524688 | doi = ] the first structure of the proteasome core particle was not solved byX-ray crystallography until 1994.cite journal | journal=Science | volume=268 | pages=533–539 | year=1995 | author=Löwe J et al. | title=Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon "T. acidophilum" at 3.4 Å resolution | pmid=7725097 | doi = 10.1126/science.7725097 ] As of 2006, no structure has been solved of the core particle in complex with the most common form of regulatory cap.tructure and organization
The proteasome subcomponents are often referred to by their
Svedberg sedimentation coefficient (denoted "S"). The most common form of the proteasome is known as the 26S proteasome, which is about 2000 kilodaltons (kDa) inmolecular mass and contains one 20S core particle structure and two 19S regulatory caps. The core is hollow and provides an enclosed cavity in which proteins are degraded; openings at the two ends of the core allow the target protein to enter. Each end of the core particle associates with a 19S regulatory subunit that contains multipleATPase active site s and ubiquitin binding sites; it is this structure that recognizes polyubiquitinated proteins and transfers them to the catalytic core. An alternative form of regulatory subunit called the 11S particle can associate with the core in essentially the same manner as the 19S particle; the 11S may play a role in degradation of foreign peptides such as those produced after infection by avirus .cite journal | journal=Cell Mol Immunol | volume=3 | issue=4 | pages= 255 | year=2006 | author=Wang J, Maldonado MA | title=The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Its Role in Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases | pmid=16978533 | doi = ]20S core particle
The number and diversity of subunits contained in the 20S core particle depends on the organism; the number of distinct and specialized subunits is larger in multicellular than unicellular organisms and larger in eukaryotes than in prokaryotes. All 20S particles consist of four stacked heptameric ring structures that are themselves composed of two different types of subunits; α subunits are structural in nature, whereas β subunits are predominantly catalytic. The outer two rings in the stack consist of seven α subunits each, which serve as docking domains for the regulatory particles and the alpha subunits N-termini form a gate that blocks unregulated access of substrates to the interior cavitycite journal |author=Smith DM, Chang SC, Park S, Finley D, Cheng Y, Goldberg AL |title=Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry |journal=Mol. Cell |volume=27 |issue=5 |pages=731–44 |year=2007 |month=Sep |pmid=17803938 |doi=10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.033 |url=] . The inner two rings each consist of seven β subunits and contain the
protease active site s that perform the proteolysis reactions. The size of the proteasome is relatively conserved and is about 150angstrom s (Å) by 115 Å. The interior chamber is at most 53 Å wide, though the entrance can be as narrow as 13 Å, suggesting that substrate proteins must be at least partially unfolded to enter.cite journal | journal=J Biosci | volume=31 | issue=1 | pages=137–55 | year=2006 | author=Nandi D et al. | title=The ubiquitin-proteasome system | pmid=16595883 | doi = 10.1007/BF02705243 ]In
archaea such as "Thermoplasma acidophilum", all the α and all the β subunits are identical, while eukaryotic proteasomes such as those inyeast contain seven distinct types of each subunit. Inmammal s, the β1, β2, and β5 subunits are catalytic; although they share a common mechanism, they have three distinct substrate specificities consideredchymotrypsin -like,trypsin -like, andpeptidyl-glutamyl peptide-hydrolyzing (PHGH).cite journal | journal=J Biol Chem | volume=272 | issue=40 | pages=25200–9 | year=1997 | author=Heinemeyer W et al. | title=The active sites of the eukaryotic 20 S proteasome and their involvement in subunit precursor processing | pmid=9312134 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.272.40.25200 ] Alternative β forms denoted β1i, β2i, and β5i can be expressed inhematopoietic cells in response to exposure to pro-inflammatory signals such ascytokine s, in particular,interferon gamma . The proteasome assembled with these alternative subunits is known as the "immunoproteasome", whose substrate specificity is altered relative to the normal proteasome.19S regulatory particle
The 19S particle in eukaryotes consists of 19 individual proteins and is divisible into two subassemblies, a 10-protein base that binds directly to the α ring of the 20S core particle, and a 9-protein lid where polyubiquitin is bound. Six of the ten base proteins are ATPase subunits from the AAA Family, and an evolutionary homolog of these ATPases exists in archaea, called PAN (Proteasome Activating Nucleotidase) [cite journal |author=Zwickl P, Ng D, Woo KM, Klenk HP, Goldberg AL |title=An archaebacterial ATPase, homologous to ATPases in the eukaryotic 26 S proteasome, activates protein breakdown by 20 S proteasomes |journal=J. Biol. Chem. |volume=274 |issue=37 |pages=26008–14 |year=1999 |month=Sep |pmid=10473546 |doi= 10.1074/jbc.274.37.26008|url=http://www.jbc.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10473546] . The association of the 19S and 20S particles requires the binding of ATP to the 19S ATPase subunits, but ATP hydrolysis is required for the assembled complex to degrade folded and ubiquitinated proteins. Interestingly, only the step of substrate unfolding requires energy from ATP hydrolyis, while ATP-binding alone can support all the other steps required for protein degradation (e.g. complex assembly, gate opening, translocation and proteolysis).cite journal |author=Smith DM, Kafri G, Cheng Y, Ng D, Walz T, Goldberg AL |title=ATP binding to PAN or the 26S ATPases causes association with the 20S proteasome, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded proteins |journal=Mol. Cell |volume=20 |issue=5 |pages=687–98 |year=2005 |month=Dec |pmid=16337593 |doi=10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.019 |url=] [cite journal | journal=Mol Cell | volume=24 | issue=1 | pages=39–50 | year=2006 | author=Liu CW et al. | title=ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis play distinct roles in the function of 26S proteasome | pmid=17018291 | doi = 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.025 ] In fact, ATP binding to the ATPases by itself supports the rapid degradation of unfolded proteins. However, while ATP hydrolysis is required for unfolding only it is not yet clear whether this energy may be used in the coupling of some of these steps. [cite journal | journal=Nature | volume=416 | issue=6882 | pages=763–7 | year=2002 | author=Lam YA et al. | title=A proteasomal ATPase subunit recognizes the polyubiquitin degradation signal | pmid=11961560 | doi = 10.1038/416763a ] cite journal | journal=Mol Cell | volume=24 | issue=1 | pages=39–50 | year=2006 | author=Liu CW et al. | title=ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis play distinct roles in the function of 26S proteasome | pmid=17018291 | doi = 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.025 ] As of 2008, the atomic structure of the 26S proteasome has not been solved, despite massive efforts to do so. Nevertheless, it is understood generally how the 19S associates with and regulates the 20S core particlecite journal | journal=PLoS Biol | volume=4 | issue=8 | pages=e267 | year=2006 | author=Sharon M et al. | title=Structural Organization of the 19S Proteasome Lid: Insights from MS of Intact Complexes | pmid=16869714 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040267 ] . In fact, the 19S and 11S particles bind to the same sites in the α rings of the 20S core particle although, they each induce gate opening by different mechanism.
Regulation of the 20S by the 19S
The 19S regulatory particle is responsible for stimulating the 20S to degrade proteins. A primary function of the 19S regulatory ATPAses is to open the gate in the 20S that blocks the entry of subustrates into the degridation chamber [cite journal |author=Köhler A, Cascio P, Leggett DS, Woo KM, Goldberg AL, Finley D |title=The axial channel of the proteasome core particle is gated by the Rpt2 ATPase and controls both substrate entry and product release |journal=Mol. Cell |volume=7 |issue=6 |pages=1143–52 |year=2001 |month=Jun |pmid=11430818 |doi= 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00274-X|url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1097-2765(01)00274-X] . The mechanism by which the proteasomal ATPase open this gate has been recently elucidated. 20S gate opening, and thus substrate degradation, requires the C-termini of the proteasomal ATPases, which contains a specific motif (i.e. HbYX motif). The ATPases C-termini bind into pockets in the top of the 20S, and tether the ATPase complex to the 20S proteolitic complex thus joining the substrate unfolding equipment with the 20S degradation machinery. Binding of these C-termini into these 20S pockets by themselves stimulates opening of the gate in the 20S much like a "Key-in-a-lock" opens a door. The precise mechanism by which this "key-in-a-lock" mechanism functions has been structuraly elucidated [cite journal |author=Rabl J, Smith DM, Yu Y, Chang SC, Goldberg AL, Cheng Y |title=Mechanism of gate opening in the 20S proteasome by the proteasomal ATPases |journal=Mol. Cell |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=360–8 |year=2008 |month=May |pmid=18471981 |doi=10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.004 |url=] .
11S regulatory particle
20S proteasomes can also associate with a second type of regulatory particle, the 11S regulatory particle, a heptameric structure that does not contain any
ATPase s and can promote the degradation of shortpeptide s, but not of complete proteins. It is presumed that this is because the complex cannot unfold larger substrates. This structure is also known as PA28 or REG. The mechanisms by which it binds to the core particle through the C-terminal tails of its subunits and induces α-ringconformational change s to open the 20S gate suggest a similar mechanism for the 19S particle.cite journal | journal=Mol Cell | volume=18 | issue=5 | pages=589–99 | year=2005 | author=Forster A et al. | title=The 1.9 Å Structure of a Proteasome-11S Activator Complex and Implications for Proteasome-PAN/PA700 Interactions | pmid=15916965 | doi = 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.04.016 ] The expression of the 11S particle is induced byinterferon gamma and is responsible, in conjunction with the immunoproteasome β subunits, for the generation of peptides that bind to themajor histocompatibility complex .Assembly
The assembly of the proteasome is a complex process due to the number of subunits that must associate to form an active complex. The β subunits are synthesized with N-terminal "propeptides" that are post-translationally modified during the assembly of the 20S particle to expose the proteolytic active site. The 20S particle is assembled from two half-proteasomes, each of which consists of a seven-membered pro-β ring attached to a seven-membered α ring. The association of the β rings of the two half-proteasomes triggers
threonine -dependentautolysis of the propeptides to expose the active site. These β interactions are mediated mainly bysalt bridge s andhydrophobic interactions between conserved alpha helices whose disruption bymutation damages the proteasome's ability to assemble.cite journal | journal=Structure | volume=14 | issue=7 | pages=1179–88 | year=2006 | author=Witt S et al. | title=Proteasome assembly triggers a switch required for active-site maturation | pmid=16843899 | doi = 10.1016/j.str.2006.05.019 ] The assembly of the half-proteasomes, in turn, is initiated by the assembly of the α subunits into their heptameric ring, forming a template for the association of the corresponding pro-β ring. The assembly of α subunits has not been characterized.cite journal | journal=Biochimie | volume=83 | issue=3-4 | pages=289–93 | year=2001 | author=Kruger E et al. | title=20S proteasome biogenesis | pmid=11295488 | doi = 10.1016/S0300-9084(01)01241-X ]In general, less is known about the assembly and maturation of the 19S regulatory particles. They are believed to assemble as two distinct subcomponents, the ATPase-containing base and the ubiquitin-recognizing lid. The six ATPases in the base may assemble in a pairwise manner mediated by
coiled-coil interactions.cite journal | journal=Mol Biol Rep | volume=26 | issue=1-2 | pages=15–9 | year=1999 | author=Gorbea C et al. | title=Assembly of the regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome | pmid=10363641 | doi = 10.1023/A:1006957802028 ] The order in which the nineteen subunits of the regulatory particle are bound is a likely regulatory mechanism that prevents exposure of the active site before assembly is complete.The protein degradation process
Ubiquitination and targeting
Proteins are targeted for degradation by the proteasome by
covalent modification of alysine residue that requires the coordinated reactions of threeenzyme s. In the first step, aubiquitin-activating enzyme (known as E1) hydrolyzes ATP and adenylates a ubiquitin molecule. This is then transferred to E1's active-sitecysteine residue in concert with the adenylation of a second ubiquitin.Haas AL, Warms JV, Hershko A, Rose IA. Ubiquitin-activating enzyme: Mechanism and role in protein-ubiquitin conjugation. "J Biol Chem." 1982 March 10;257(5):2543–8. PMID 6277905] This adenylated ubiquitin is then transferred to a cysteine of a second enzyme,ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2). In the last step, a member of a highly diverse class of enzymes known asubiquitin ligase s (E3) recognizes the specific protein to be ubiquitinated and catalyzes the transfer of ubiquitin from E2 to this target protein. A target protein must be labeled with at least four ubiquitin monomers (in the form of a polyubiquitin chain) before it is recognized by the proteasome lid.cite journal | journal=EMBO J | volume=19 | pages=94–102 | year=2000 | author=Thrower JS et al. | title=Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal | pmid=10619848 | doi = 10.1093/emboj/19.1.94 ] It is therefore the E3 that confers substrate specificity to this system.cite journal | journal=Plant J | volume=34 | issue=6 | pages=753–67 | year=2003 | author=Risseeuw EP et al. | title=Protein interaction analysis of SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase subunits from Arabidopsis | pmid=12795696 | doi = 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01768.x ] The number of E1, E2, and E3 proteins expressed depends on the organism and cell type, but there are many different E3 enzymes present in humans, indicating that there is a huge number of targets for the ubiquitin proteasome system.The mechanism by which a polyubiquitinated protein is targeted to the proteasome is not fully understood. Ubiquitin-receptor proteins have an N-terminal ubiquitin-like (UBL) domain and one or more ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domains. The UBL domains are recognized by the 19S proteasome caps and the UBA domains bind ubiquitin via three-helix bundles. These receptor proteins may escort polyubiquitinated proteins to the proteasome, though the specifics of this interaction and its regulation are unclear.cite journal | journal=Nat Cell Biol | volume=7 | issue=8 | pages=742–9 | year=2005 | author=Elsasser S, Finley D | title=Delivery of ubiquitinated substrates to protein-unfolding machines | pmid=16056265 | doi = 10.1038/ncb0805-742 ]
The ubiquitin protein itself is 76
amino acid s long and was named due to its ubiquitous nature, as it has a highly conserved sequence and is found in all known eukaryotic organisms. The genes encoding ubiquitin ineukaryote s are arranged intandem repeat s, possibly due to the heavy transcription demands on these genes to produce enough ubiquitin for the cell. It has been proposed that ubiquitin is the slowest-evolving protein identified to date.cite journal | journal=J Mol Evol | volume=25 | issue=1 | pages=1432–1432 | year=1987 | author=Sharp PM, Li WH | title=Ubiquitin genes as a paradigm of concerted evolution of tandem repeats | pmid=3041010 | doi =10.1007/BF02100041 ]Unfolding and translocation
After a protein has been ubiquitinated, it is recognized by the 19S regulatory particle in an ATP-dependent binding step. The substrate protein must then enter the interior of the 20S particle to come in contact with the proteolytic active sites. Because the 20S particle's central channel is narrow and gated by the N-terminal tails of the α ring subunits, the substrates must be at least partially unfolded before they enter the core. The passage of the unfolded substrate into the core is called "translocation" and necessarily occurs after deubiquitination. However, the order in which substrates are deubiquitinated and unfolded is not yet clear.cite journal | journal=Exp Cell Res | volume=307 | issue=2 | pages=436–51 | year=2005 | author=Zhu Q et al. | title=Deubiquitination by proteasome is coordinated with substrate translocation for proteolysis in vivo | pmid=15950624 | doi = 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.03.031 ] Which of these processes is the
rate-limiting step in the overall proteolysis reaction depends on the specific substrate; for some proteins, the unfolding process is rate-limiting, while deubiquitination is the slowest step for other proteins. The extent to which substrates must be unfolded before translocation is not known, but substantialtertiary structure , and in particular nonlocal interactions such asdisulfide bond s, are sufficient to inhibit degradation.cite journal | journal=Nat Struct Biol | volume=2 | pages=199–204 | year=1995 | author=Wenzel T, Baumeister W | title=Conformational constraints in protein degradation by the 20S proteasome | pmid=7773788 | doi = 10.1038/nsb0395-199 ]The gate formed by the α subunits prevents peptides longer than about four residues from entering the interior of the 20S particle. The ATP molecules bound before the initial recognition step are hydrolyzed before translocation. While energy is needed for substrate unfolding it is not required for translocation. cite journal | journal=Mol Cell | volume=20 | issue=5 | pages=687–98 | year=2005 | author=Smith DM et al. | title=ATP binding to PAN or the 26S ATPases causes association with the 20S proteasome, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded proteins | pmid=16337593 | doi = 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.019 ] [cite journal |author=Liu CW, Li X, Thompson D, "et al" |title=ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis play distinct roles in the function of 26S proteasome |journal=Mol. Cell |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=39–50 |year=2006 |month=Oct |pmid=17018291 |doi=10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.025 |url=] . The assembled 26S proteasome can degrade unfolded proteins in the presence of a non-hydrolyzable ATP analog, but cannot degrade folded proteins, indicating that energy from ATP hydrolysis is used for substrate unfolding. Passage of the unfolded substrate through the opened gate occurs via
facilitated diffusion if the 19S cap is in the ATP-bound state.cite journal | journal=J Struct Biol | volume=156 | issue=1 | pages=72–83 | year=2006 | author=Smith DM et al. | title=Proteasomes and their associated ATPases: a destructive combination | pmid=16919475 | doi = ]The mechanism for unfolding of
globular protein s is necessarily general, but somewhat dependent on the amino acid sequence. Long sequences of alternatingglycine andalanine have been shown to inhibit substrate unfolding decreasing the efficiency of proteasomal degradation; this results in the release of partially degraded byproducts, possibly due to the decoupling of the ATP hydrolysis and unfolding steps.cite journal | journal=EMBO J | volume=25 | issue=8 | pages=1720–9 | year=2006 | author=Hoyt MA et al. | title=Glycine-alanine repeats impair proper substrate unfolding by the proteasome | pmid=16601692 | doi = 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601058 ] Such glycine-alanine repeats are also found in nature, for example insilk fibroin ; in particular, certainEpstein-Barr virus gene products bearing this sequence can stall the proteasome, helping the virus propagate by preventingantigen presentation on themajor histocompatibility complex .cite journal | journal=J Biol Chem | volume=279 | issue=10 | pages=8635–41 | year=2004 | author=Zhang M, Coffino P | title=Repeat sequence of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded nuclear antigen 1 protein interrupts proteasome substrate processing | pmid=14688254 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.M310449200 ]Proteolysis
The mechanism of proteolysis by the β subunits of the 20S core particle is through a
threonine -dependent nucleophilic attack. This mechanism may depend on an associatedwater molecule for deprotonation of the reactive threoninehydroxyl . Degradation occurs within the central chamber formed by the association of the two β rings and normally does not release partially degraded products, instead reducing the substrate to short polypeptides typically 7–9 residues long, though they can range from 4 to 25 residues depending on the organism and substrate. The biochemical mechanism that determines product length is not fully characterized.cite journal | journal=Annu Rev Biochem | volume=68 | pages=1015–1068 | year=1999 | author=Voges D et al. | title=The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis | pmid=10872471 | doi = 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.1015 ] Although the three catalytic β subunits have a common mechanism, they have slightly different substrate specificities, which are consideredchymotrypsin -like,trypsin -like, andpeptidyl-glutamyl peptide-hydrolyzing (PHGH)-like. These variations in specificity are the result of interatomic contacts with local residues near the active sites of each subunit. Each catalytic β subunit also possesses a conservedlysine residue required for proteolysis.Although the proteasome normally produces very short peptide fragments, in some cases these products are themselves biologically active and functional molecules. Certain
transcription factor s, including one component of themammal ian complex NF-κB, are synthesized as inactive precursors whose ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation converts them to an active form. Such activity requires the proteasome to cleave the substrate protein internally: rather than processively degrading it from one terminus. It has been suggested that long loops on these proteins' surfaces serve as the proteasomal substrates and enter the central cavity, while the majority of the protein remains outside.cite journal | journal=Nat Cell Biol | volume=4 | issue=5 | pages=E113–6 | year=2002 | author=Rape M, Jentsch S | title=Taking a bite: proteasomal protein processing | pmid=11988749 | doi = 10.1038/ncb0502-e113 ] Similar effects have been observed inyeast proteins; this mechanism of selective degradation is known as "regulated ubiquitin/proteasome dependent processing" (RUP).cite journal | journal=Biochim Biophys Acta | volume=1695 | issue=1-3 | pages=209–13 | year=2004 | author=Rape M, Jentsch S | title=Productive RUPture: activation of transcription factors by proteasomal processing | pmid=15571816 | doi =10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.09.022 ]Ubiquitin-independent degradation
Although most proteasomal substrates must be ubiquitinated before being degraded, there are some exceptions to this general rule, especially when the proteasome plays a normal role in the post-translational processing of the protein. The proteasomal activation of NF-κB by processing
p105 into p50 via internal proteolysis is one major example. Some proteins that are hypothesized to be unstable due to intrinsically unstructured regions,cite journal | journal=Bioessays | volume=28 | issue=8 | pages=844–9 | year=2006 | author=Asher G, Reuven N, Shaul Y | title=20S proteasomes and protein degradation "by default" | pmid=16927316 | doi = 10.1002/bies.20447 ] are degraded in a ubiquitin-independent manner. The most well-known example of a ubiquitin-independent proteasome substrate is the enzymeornithine decarboxylase .cite journal | journal=EMBO J | volume=22 | issue=7 | pages=1488–96 | year=2003 | author=Zhang M, Pickart CM, Coffino P | title=Determinants of proteasome recognition of ornithine decarboxylase, a ubiquitin-independent substrate | pmid=12660156 | doi = 10.1093/emboj/cdg158 ] Ubiquitin-independent mechanisms targeting keycell cycle regulators such asp53 have also been reported, although p53 is also subject to ubiquitin-dependent degradation.cite journal | journal=Cell Cycle | volume=4 | issue=8 | pages=1015–8 | year=2005 | author=Asher G, Shaul Y | title=p53 proteasomal degradation: poly-ubiquitination is not the whole story | pmid=16082197 | doi = ] Finally, structurally abnormal, misfolded, or highly oxidized proteins are also subject to ubiquitin-independent and 19S-independent degradation under conditions of cellular stress.cite journal | journal=J Biol Chem | volume=278 | issue=1 | pages=311–8 | year=2003 | author=Shringarpure R et al. | title=Ubiquitin conjugation is not required for the degradation of oxidized proteins by proteasome | pmid=12401807 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.M206279200 ]Evolution
The 20S proteasome is both ubiquitous and essential in
eukaryote s. Someprokaryote s, including manyarchaea and thebacteria l orderActinomycetales also share homologs of the 20S proteasome, whereas most bacteria possessheat shock geneshslV andhslU , whose gene products are a multimeric protease arranged in a two-layered ring and an ATPase.cite journal | journal=J Mol Biol | volume=326 | pages=1437–1448 | year=2003 | author=Gille C et al. | title=A Comprehensive View on Proteasomal Sequences: Implications for the Evolution of the Proteasome | pmid=12595256 | doi = 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01470-5 ] The hslV protein has been hypothesized to resemble the likely ancestor of the 20S proteasome.cite journal | journal=Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. | volume=28 | pages=295–317 | year=1999 | author=Bochtler M et al. | title=The proteasome | pmid=10410804 | doi = 10.1146/annurev.biophys.28.1.295 ] In general, HslV is not essential in bacteria, and not all bacteria possess it, whereas someprotist s possess both the 20S and the hslV systems.Sequence analysis suggests that the catalytic β subunits diverged earlier in evolution than the predominantly structural α subunits. In bacteria that express a 20S proteasome, the β subunits have high
sequence identity to archaeal and eukaryotic β subunits, whereas the α sequence identity is much lower. The presence of 20S proteasomes in bacteria may result fromlateral gene transfer , while the diversification of subunits among eukaryotes is ascribed to multiplegene duplication events.Cell cycle control
Cell cycle progression is controlled by ordered action of
cyclin-dependent kinase s (CDKs), activated by specificcyclin s that demarcate phases of thecell cycle . Mitotic cyclins, which persist in the cell for only a few minutes, have one of the shortest life spans of all intracellular proteins. After a CDK-cyclin complex has performed its function, the associated cyclin is polyubiquitinated and destroyed by the proteasome, which provides directionality for the cell cycle. In particular, exit frommitosis requires the proteasome-dependent dissociation of the regulatory componentcyclin B from themitosis promoting factor complex.cite journal | journal=Cell Cycle | volume=5 | issue=15 | pages=1687–98 | year=2006 | author=Chesnel F et al. | title=Cyclin B dissociation from CDK1 precedes its degradation upon MPF inactivation in mitotic extracts of Xenopus laevis embryos | pmid=16921258 | doi = ] Invertebrate cells, "slippage" through the mitotic checkpoint leading to prematureM phase exit can occur despite the delay of this exit by thespindle checkpoint .cite journal | journal=Curr Biol | volume=16 | issue=12 | pages=1194–200 | year=2006 | author=Brito DA, Rieder CL | title=Mitotic checkpoint slippage in humans occurs via cyclin B destruction in the presence of an active checkpoint | pmid=16782009 | doi = 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.043 ]Earlier cell cycle checkpoints such a post-
restriction point check between G1 phase andS phase similarly involve proteasomal degradation ofcyclin A , whose ubiquitination is promoted by theanaphase promoting complex (APC), an E3ubiquitin ligase .cite journal | journal=Mol Cell Biol | volume=26 | issue=12 | pages=4701–11 | year=2006 | author=Havens CG et al. | title=Regulation of late G1/S phase transition and APC Cdh1 by reactive oxygen species | pmid=16738333 | doi = 10.1128/MCB.00303-06 ] The APC and the Skp1/Cul1/F-box protein complex (SCF complex ) are the two key regulators of cyclin degradation and checkpoint control; the SCF itself is regulated by the APC via ubiquitination of the adaptor protein, Skp2, which prevents SCF activity before the G1-S transition.cite journal | journal=Nature | volume=428 | issue=6979 | pages=190–3 | year=2004 | author=Bashir T et al. | title=Control of the SCF(Skp2-Cks1) ubiquitin ligase by the APC/C(Cdh1) ubiquitin ligase | pmid=15014502 | doi = 10.1038/nature02330 ]Individual components of the 19S particle have their own regulatory roles.
Gankyrin , a recently identified oncoprotein, is one of the 19S subcomponents that also tightly binds thecyclin-dependent kinase CDK4 and plays a key role in recognizing ubiquitinatedp53 , via its affinity for the ubiquitin ligaseMDM2 . Gankyrin is anti-apoptotic and has been shown to be overexpressed in sometumor cell types such ashepatocellular carcinoma .cite journal | journal=Cell Cycle | volume=4 | issue=10 | pages=1335–7 | year=2005 | author=Higashitsuji H et al. | title=The oncoprotein gankyrin negatively regulates both p53 and RB by enhancing proteasomal degradation | pmid=16177571 | doi = ]Regulation of plant growth
In
plant s, signaling byauxin s, orphytohormone s that order the direction andtropism of plant growth, induces the targeting of a class oftranscription factor repressors known as Aux/IAA proteins for proteasomal degradation. These proteins are ubiquitinated by SCFTIR1, or SCF in complex with the auxin receptor TIR1. Degradation of Aux/IAA proteins derepresses transcription factors in the auxin-response factor (ARF) family and induces ARF-directed gene expression.cite journal | journal=Plant Mol Biol | volume=49 | issue=3-4 | pages=401–9 | year=2002 | author=Dharmasiri S, Estelle M | title=The role of regulated protein degradation in auxin response | pmid=12036263 | doi = 10.1023/A:1015203013208 ] The cellular consequences of ARF activation depend on the plant type and developmental stage, but are involved in directing growth in roots and leaf veins. The specific response to ARF derepression is thought to be mediated by specificity in the pairing of individual ARF and Aux/IAA proteins.cite journal | journal=EMBO J | volume=24 | issue=10 | pages=1874–85 | year=2005 | author=Weijers D et al. | title=Developmental specificity of auxin response by pairs of ARF and Aux/IAA transcriptional regulators | pmid=15889151 | doi = 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600659 ]Apoptosis
Both internal and external signals can lead to the induction of
apoptosis , or programmed cell death. The resulting deconstruction of cellular components is primarily carried out by specialized proteases known ascaspase s, but the proteasome also plays important and diverse roles in the apoptotic process. The involvement of the proteasome in this process is indicated by both the increase in protein ubiquitination, and of E1, E2, and E3 enzymes that is observed well in advance of apoptosis,cite journal | journal=Neuron | volume=5 | issue=4 | pages=411–9 | year=1990 | author=Schwartz LM et al. | title=Activation of polyubiquitin gene expression during developmentally programmed cell death | pmid=2169771 | doi = 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90080-Y ] cite journal | journal=FEBS Lett | volume=400 | issue=3 | pages=345–9 | year=1997 | author=Löw P et al. | title=Expression of a 26S proteasome ATPase subunit, MS73, in muscles that undergo developmentally programmed cell death, and its control by ecdysteroid hormones in the insect Manduca sexta | pmid=9009228 | doi = 10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01413-5 ] cite journal | journal=J Biol Chem | volume=270 | issue=16 | pages=9407–12 | year=1995 | author=Haas AL et al. | title=Coordinated induction of the ubiquitin conjugation pathway accompanies the developmentally programmed death of insect skeletal muscle | pmid=7721865 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.270.16.9407 ] During apoptosis, proteasomes localized to the nucleus have also been observed to translocate to outer membrane blebs characteristic of apoptosis.cite journal | journal=FEBS Lett | volume=394 | issue=1 | pages=47–50 | year=1996 | author=Pitzer F et al. | title=Removal of proteasomes from the nucleus and their accumulation in apoptotic blebs during programmed cell death | pmid=8925925 | doi = 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00920-9 ]Proteasome inhibition has different effects on apoptosis induction in different cell types. In general, the proteasome is not required for apoptosis, although inhibiting it is pro-apoptotic in most cell types that have been studied. However, some cell lines — in particular,
primary culture s of quiescent and differentiated cells such asthymocyte s andneuron s — are prevented from undergoing apoptosis on exposure to proteasome inhibitors. The mechanism for this effect is not clear, but is hypothesized to be specific to cells in quiescent states, or to result from the differential activity of the pro-apoptotickinase JNK .cite journal | journal=Cell Death Differ | volume=6 | pages=303–313 | year=1999 | author=Orlowski RZ | title=The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in apoptosis | pmid=10381632 | doi = 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400505 ] The ability of proteasome inhibitors to induce apoptosis in rapidly dividing cells has been exploited in several recently developedchemotherapy agents such asbortezomib andsalinosporamide A .Response to cellular stress
In response to cellular stresses - such as
infection ,heat shock , or oxidative damage -heat shock protein s that identify misfolded or unfolded proteins and target them for proteasomal degradation are expressed. BothHsp27 andHsp90 —chaperone proteins have been implicated in increasing the activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, though they are not direct participants in the process.Garrido C, Brunet M, Didelot C, Zermati Y, Schmitt E, Kroemer G. (2006). Heat Shock Proteins 27 and 70: Anti-Apoptotic Proteins with Tumorigenic Properties. "Cell Cycle" 5(22). PMID 17106261 ]Hsp70 , on the other hand, binds exposedhydrophobic patches on the surface of misfolded proteins and recruits E3 ubiquitin ligases such as CHIP to tag the proteins for proteasomal degradation.cite journal | journal=Mol Biol Cell | volume=18 | issue=1 | pages=153–65 | year=2007 | author=Park SH et al. | title=The cytoplasmic Hsp70 chaperone machinery subjects misfolded and endoplasmic reticulum import-incompetent proteins to degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system | pmid=17065559 | doi = 10.1091/mbc.E06-04-0338 ] The CHIP protein (carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein) is itself regulated via inhibition of interactions between the E3 enzyme CHIP and its E2 binding partner.cite journal | journal=J Biol Chem | volume=280 | issue=46 | pages=38673–81 | year=2005 | author=Dai Q et al. | title=Regulation of the cytoplasmic quality control protein degradation pathway by BAG2 | pmid=16169850 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.M507986200 ]Similar mechanisms exist to promote the degradation of oxidatively damaged proteins via the proteasome system. In particular, proteasomes localized to the nucleus are regulated by
PARP and actively degrade inappropriately oxidizedhistone s.cite journal | journal=Biol Chem | volume=387 | issue=10-11 | pages=1351–5 | year=2006 | author=Bader N, Grune T | title=Protein oxidation and proteolysis | pmid=17081106 | doi = 10.1515/BC.2006.169 ] Oxidized proteins, which often form large amorphous aggregates in the cell, can be degraded directly by the 20S core particle without the 19S regulatory cap and do not require ATP hydrolysis or tagging with ubiquitin. However, high levels of oxidative damage increases the degree of cross-linking between protein fragments, rendering the aggregates resistant to proteolysis. Larger numbers and sizes of such highly oxidized aggregates are associated withaging .cite journal | journal=Biochimie | volume=83 | issue=3-4 | pages=301–10 | year=2003 | author=Davies KJ | title=Degradation of oxidized proteins by the 20S proteasome | pmid=11295490 | doi = 10.1016/S0300-9084(01)01250-0 ]Impaired proteasomal activity has been suggested as an explanation for some of the late-onset
neurodegenerative diseases that share aggregation of misfolded proteins as a common feature, such asParkinson's disease andAlzheimer's disease . In these diseases large insoluble aggregates of misfolded proteins can form and then result inneurotoxicity , through mechanisms that are not yet well understood. Decreased proteasome activity has been suggested as a cause of aggregation andLewy body formation in Parkinson's.cite journal | journal=Neurology | volume=66 | issue=10 Suppl 4 | pages=S37–49 | year=2006 | author=McNaught KS et al. | title=Proteasomal dysfunction in sporadic Parkinson's disease | pmid=16717251 | doi = 10.1212/01.wnl.0000221745.58886.2e ] This hypothesis is supported by the observation thatyeast models of Parkinson's are more susceptible to toxicity from α-synuclein, the major protein component of Lewy bodies, under conditions of low proteasome activity.cite journal | journal=J Mol Neurosci | volume=28 | issue=2 | pages=161–78 | year=2006 | author=Sharma N et al. | title=Alpha-Synuclein budding yeast model: toxicity enhanced by impaired proteasome and oxidative stress | pmid=16679556 | doi = 10.1385/JMN:28:2:161 ]Role in the immune system
The proteasome plays a straightforward but critical role in the function of the adaptive immune system. Peptide
antigen s are displayed by themajor histocompatibility complex class I (MHC) proteins on the surface ofantigen-presenting cell s. These peptides are products of proteasomal degradation of proteins originated by the invadingpathogen . Although constitutively expressed proteasomes can participate in this process, a specialized complex composed of proteins whose expression is induced byinterferon gamma produces peptides of the optimal size and composition for MHC binding. These proteins whose expression increases during the immune response include the 11S regulatory particle, whose main known biological role is regulating the production of MHC ligands, and specialized β subunits called β1i, β2i, and β5i with altered substrate specificity. The complex formed with the specialized β subunits is known as the "immunoproteasome". Another β5i variant subunit, β5t, is expressed in the thymus, leading to a thymus-specific "thymoproteasome" (Murata et al., Science 316:1349 (2007)) whose function is as yet unclear.The strength of MHC class I ligand binding is dependent on the composition of the ligand C-terminus, as peptides bind by
hydrogen bond ing and by close contacts with a region called the "B pocket" on the MHC surface. Many MHC class I alleles prefer hydrophobic C-terminal residues, and the immunoproteasome complex is more likely to generate hydrophobic C-termini.Due to its role in generating the activated form of NF-κB, an anti-apoptotic and pro-
inflammatory regulator ofcytokine expression, proteasomal activity has been linked to inflammatory andautoimmune disease s. Increased levels of proteasome activity correlate with disease activity and have been implicated in autoimmune diseases includingsystemic lupus erythematosus andrheumatoid arthritis .Proteasome inhibitors
Proteasome inhibitors have effective anti-
tumor activity incell culture , inducingapoptosis by disrupting the regulated degradation of pro-growth cell cycle proteins.cite journal | journal=Cancer Res | volume=59 | issue=11 | pages=2615–22 | year=1999 | author=Adams J et al. | title=Proteasome inhibitors: a novel class of potent and effective antitumor agents | pmid=10363983 | doi = ] This approach of selectively inducing apoptosis in tumor cells has proven effective in animal models and human trials.Bortezomib , a molecule developed byMillennium Pharmaceuticals and marketed as Velcade, is the first proteasome inhibitor to reach clinical use as achemotherapy agent. [http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00905.html United States Food and Drug Administration press release] 13 May 2003. Access date 29 December 2006. See also [http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/velcade/ FDA Velcade information page] .] Bortezomib is used in the treatment ofmultiple myeloma .cite journal | journal=J Clin Oncol | volume=24 | issue=30 | pages=4867–74 | year=2006 | author=Fisher RI et al. | title=Multicenter phase II study of bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma | pmid=17001068 | doi = 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.9665 ] Notably, multiple myeloma has been observed to result in increased proteasome levels inblood serum that decrease to normal levels in response to successful chemotherapy.cite journal | journal=Blood | volume=109 | issue=5 | pages=2100–5 | year=2007 | author=Jakob C et al. | title=Circulating proteasome levels are an independent prognostic factor for survival in multiple myeloma | pmid=17095627 | doi = 10.1182/blood-2006-04-016360 ] Studies in animals have indicated that bortezomib may also have clinically significant effects inpancreatic cancer .cite journal | journal=J Cell Biochem | volume=82 | issue=1 | pages=110–22 | year=2001 | author=Shah SA et al. | title=26S proteasome inhibition induces apoptosis and limits growth of human pancreatic cancer | pmid=11400168 | doi = 10.1002/jcb.1150 ] cite journal | journal=Mol Cancer Ther | volume=3 | issue=1 | pages=59–70 | year=2004 | author=Nawrocki ST et al. | title=The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enhances the activity of docetaxel in orthotopic human pancreatic tumor xenografts | pmid=14749476 | doi = ] Preclinical and early clinical studies have been started to examine bortezomib's effectiveness in treating otherB-cell -related cancers,cite journal | journal=Clin Lymphoma | volume=3 | issue=1 | pages=49–55 | year=2002 | author=Schenkein D | title=Proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of B-cell malignancies | pmid=12141956 | doi =10.3816/CLM.2002.n.011 ] particularly some types ofnon-Hodgkin's lymphoma .cite journal | journal=J Clin Oncol | volume=23 | issue=4 | pages=676–84 | year=2005 | author=O'Connor OA et al. | title=Phase II clinical experience with the novel proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma | pmid=15613699 | doi = 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.050 ]The molecule
ritonavir , marketed as Norvir, was developed as aprotease inhibitor and used to targetHIV infection. However, it has been shown to inhibit proteasomes as well as free proteases; to be specific, thechymotrypsin -like activity of the proteasome is inhibited by ritonavir, while thetrypsin -like activity is somewhat enhanced.cite journal | journal=J Biol Chem | volume=274 | issue=50 | pages=35734–40 | year=1999 | author=Schmidtke G et al. | title=How an inhibitor of the HIV-I protease modulates proteasome activity | pmid=10585454 | doi = 10.1074/jbc.274.50.35734 ] Studies in animal models suggest that ritonavir may have inhibitory effects on the growth ofglioma cells.cite journal | journal=Mol Cancer Ther | volume=3 | issue=2 | pages=129–36 | year=2004 | author=Laurent N et al. | title=Effects of the proteasome inhibitor ritonavir on glioma growth in vitro and in vivo | pmid=14985453 | doi = ]Proteasome inhibitors have also shown promise in treating autoimmune diseases in animal models. For example, studies in mice bearing human
skin graft s found a reduction in the size of lesions frompsoriasis after treatment with a proteasome inhibitor.cite journal | journal=J Clin Invest. | volume=109 | pages=671–679 | year=2002 | author=Zollner TM et al. | title=Proteasome inhibition reduces superantigenmediated T cell activation and the severity of psoriasis in a SCID-hu model | pmid=11877475 | doi = ] Inhibitors also show positive effects inrodent models ofasthma .cite journal | journal=J Allergy Clin Immunol. | volume=104 | pages=294–300 | year=1999 | author=Elliott PJ et al. | title=Proteasome inhibition: A novel mechanism to combat asthma | pmid=10452747 | doi = 10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70369-6 ]Labeling and inhibition of the proteasome is also of interest in laboratory settings for both "in vitro" and "in vivo" study of proteasomal activity in cells. The most commonly used laboratory inhibitor is
lactacystin , a natural product synthesized by "Streptomyces "bacteria .Fluorescent inhibitors have also been developed to specifically label the active sites of the assembled proteasome.cite journal | journal=Chem Biol | volume=13 | issue=11 | pages=1217–26 | year=2006 | author=Verdoes M et al. | title=A fluorescent broad-spectrum proteasome inhibitor for labeling proteasomes in vitro and in vivo | pmid=17114003 | doi = 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.09.013 ]See also
* Exosome
* Endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradationReferences
External links
* [http://www.plosbiology.org/plosonline/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020013 PLOS Primer: The Proteasome and the Delicate Balance between Destruction and Rescue]
* [http://biochemie.web.med.uni-muenchen.de/feldmann/proteasome_units.html The Yeast 26S Proteasome with list of subunits and pictures]
* [http://www.nature.com/cdd/journal/v12/n9/full/4401691a.html "Cell Death and Differentiation's" interview with Aaron Ciechanover]
* [http://www.nature.com/cdd/journal/v12/n9/full/4401709a.html "Cell Death and Differentiation's" interview with Avram Hershko]
* [http://www.nature.com/cdd/journal/v12/n9/full/4401700a.html "Cell Death and Differentiation's" interview with Irwin Rose]
* [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17979756 Proteasome Inhibition by Disulfiram and Dithiocarbamates]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.