- De Havilland Hornet
:"For the 1930's single-engine cabin biplane see:
de Havilland Hornet Moth " infobox Aircraft
name = D.H.103 Hornet Sea Hornet
type = Land- and naval-basedfighter aircraft
manufacturer =de Havilland
caption = The de Havilland Hornet Mk 1 (F.1)(note both propellers are feathered, with engines stopped)
designer =
first flight = 28 July 1944
introduced = 1946
retired = 1956
status =
primary user =Royal Air Force
more users =Royal Navy
number built = 383
unit cost =
produced = 1945 to 1950
developed from=The British de Havilland DH.103 Hornet was a
piston engine fighter that further exploited the wooden construction techniques pioneered byde Havilland 's classic Mosquito. Entering service at the end of the Second World War, the Hornet postwar equippedFighter Command day fighter units in the UK and later was used with success as a strike fighter in Malaya. The Sea Hornet was a carrier-capable version.Design and development
Designed as a private venture for a long-range fighter for use in the Pacific Theater in the war against
Japan , the Specification F.12/43 was written around the type. From an early stage it was also envisaged that the Hornet could be adapted for naval use, operating from carriers. As a result priority was given to ease of control, especially at low speeds, and good pilot visibility. Construction was of mixedbalsa /ply similar to the earlierde Havilland Mosquito , but the Hornet differed in incorporating stressedAlclad lower-wing skins bonded to the wooden upper wing structure using the then-newadhesive Redux. The two wing spars were redesigned to withstand a higher safety factor of 10 versus 8. [http://users.skynet.be/BAMRS/dh103/dh103.htm DH 103] ] Clark 1987]Apart from the revised structure the Hornet wings were a synthesis of aerodynamic knowledge that had been gathered since the Mosquito's design process, being much thinner in cross section, with de Havilland designers adopting a
laminar flow profile similar to theP-51 Mustang andHawker Tempest . Control surfaces consisted of hydraulically operated split flaps extending from the wing root to outboard of the engine nacelles; like the Mosquito the rear of the nacelles were part of the flap structure. Outboard, the Alclad-coveredaileron s extended close to the clipped wing tips and provided excellent roll control.The Hornet used "slimline"
Rolls-Royce Merlin engines that were versions of the Merlin with engine ancillaries repositioned to achieve minimum frontal area and drag. The aircraft was somewhat unusual in a British design in that it hadpropeller s that rotated in opposite directions. To achieve this the engines used slightly different gearboxes, hence the double Merlin marks of 130/131 This feature effectively cancels the variable and cumulative torque effect of two propellers turning in the same direction that had affected earlier designs such as the Mosquito, in turn reducing the amount ofadverse yaw caused byaileron trim corrections and generally providing more stable and predictable behaviour in flight. Initially the propellers were "handed" to rotate inboard, towards the fuselage, but this was found to reduce the effectiveness of the rudder so propellers "rising" outboard were used instead. [Note: The Merlin 131 had an additional idler gear which allowed the propeller to rotate to the left. The Merlin was originally designed as a "right hand tractor". On production Hornets the Merlin 131 was installed in the portnacelle , with the Merlin 130 in the starboard.] Because of the revised induction arrangements of the Merlin 130 series, the supercharger and carburettor air intakes could be placed in the leading edges of the wings, outboard of the nacelles. Other versions of the Merlin, which used "updraft" induction arrangements required that the intakes be placed in a duct below the main engine cowling. The main radiators were also mounted in the inboard leading edges of the wings. Internal fuel, to a maximum capacity of 432 Imp gallons (1,964 l) (F 3) was provided in four self-sealing wing tanks which were accessed through detachable panels forming part of the lower wing surfaces.To assist airflow over the wing the engine nacelles were mounted low, which meant that the
undercarriage legs were reasonably short and the pilot's field of view was improved.The single legged undercarriage units were simpler and cleaner than those of the Mosquito, using the same de Havilland-developed rubber-in-compression energy absorption system. The mainwheels were also smaller and lighter.
To further aid the pilot's field of view the unpressurised
cockpit was mounted well forward in thefuselage and was housed under an aft sliding, perspex blister canopy. The three-panel windscreen was designed so that refraction through the panels meant that there were no obvious blind spots caused by the corner tie-rods; all three panels were bullet-proof laminated glass. An armour plate bulkhead (hinged near the top to provide access to the back of the instrument panel and the rudder pedals), was part of the nose structure, with the pilot's back and head being protected by another armour plate bulkhead built into the cockpit. Below and behind the cockpit floor was a bay housing the built-in armament of four short-barrel 20mm Hispano V cannon, with 190 rounds per gun, firing through short blast tubes.Fuselage construction was identical to the earlier Mosquito; a balsa wood "pith" sandwiched between plywood sheets which were laid in diagonal panels.
Formaldehyde cement was the bonding agent.The fuselage halves were built on large concrete or wood patterns, equipment was fitted in each half and they were then joined along the top and bottom centre lines using wooden reinforcing strips. The entire fuselage was then tightly wrapped in fine aviation fabric which was doped in place. The tailfin which had the trademark, gracefully curved de Havilland shape, was an integral part of the rear fuselage. On Late Mk Is and future production aircraft, a fin fillet was added to the base of the unit.
The horizontal tail unit was an all-metal structure, again featuring the distinctive de Havilland shape.
Hornet F.3
The Hornet F 3's wings were stressed to carry external ordnance. Two to four "60 lb" (27 kg) RP-3 rockets could be carried under each wing; it was also possible to carry a combination of four rockets with one bomb of up to 1,000 lb (453 kg), or an additional drop tank on each wing, ranging in capacity up to 200 Imp gallons (909 l). Internally the fuel tanks were enlarged from a total capacity of 360 Imp gallons (1,636 l) to 432 Imp gallons (1,964 l) and additional equipment was added. Larger horizontal tail surfaces were adopted, with larger elevator horn balances. With the evolution of longer-range, jet-powered fighters such as the later
de Havilland Vampire marks and thede Havilland Venom andGloster Meteor , the Hornet became obsolescent fairly quickly. The F 3 was the last Hornet derivative to see operational RAF service.Hall 1990]Hornet PR 2 and FR 4
The Hornet PR 2 was intended to operate as a long-range Photo
Reconnaissance aircraft. The Hispano cannon were removed and cameras were mounted in the rear fuselage. Total internal fuel capacity was increased to 528 gallons (2,400 l)."PX216", "PX220" and "PX249" converted from standard Mk Is were the prototypes, followed by five more. The requirement for these aircraft lapsed with the end of the Second World War in the Pacific; all were scrapped before entering RAF service.Twelve Hornet FR 4s were modified from F 3s in much the same way, except that the cannon were retained and the internal fuel capacity slightly reduced from that of the fighter. Again, these aircraft were scrapped before entering service.
ea Hornet F 20, NF 21 and PR 22
The Hornet was designed with the possibilities for naval service off carriers firmly in mind. To this end good low speed handling was required, [Note: The Hornet was designed with "handed" engines and powerful flaps to cancel out any handling problems during take-off or landing. Jackson 1987, p.438.] along with good all round visibility for the pilot; the basic Hornet design excelled at meeting these requirements.
Shortly after the first Hornet prototype flew Specification N.5/44 was issued to de Havilland covering the modification of the Hornet for naval service. Heston Aircraft Co. was contracted to carry out the conversion work on three early production F.Is. The work entailed altering the wings to incorporate folding mechanisms so that each outer wing panel, from the aileron/flap line outboard could be folded upwards and inwards at an angle. The hinges were part of the upper wing skin structure while the lower wing skins incorporated securing latches. Lockheed hydraulic jacks were used to actuate the wing panels. Slotted flaps were introduced to improve low speed "flaps down" control.
The lower rear fuselage was reinforced with two additional
spruce longerons designed to take the stresses imposed by the external "vee" framed arrestor hook, which was flush-mounted below the fuselage. The frame was made up of steel tubing with a forged-steel hook and was held against the fuselage by a "snap gear". Because the Hornet used the American "3-point" system of catapultassisted take off two forged steel catapult bridle hooks were fitted, one below each wing, and close to the fuselage.The de Havilland rubber-in-compression undercarriage legs could not absorb the rebound energies imposed by carrier landings; these were replaced by more conventional hydraulic oleos which embodied torque links. Merlin 133/134s (derated from 2,070 hp (1,543 kW) to 2,030 hp (1,535 kW)) were fitted to all Sea Hornets.
Other specialised naval equipment (mainly different radio gear) was fitted and provision was made for three camera ports, one on each side of the rear fuselage and one pointing down. Sea Hornet F 20s also incorporated the modifications of the Hornet F 3, although the internal fuel capacity was 347 Imp gal (1,557 l), slightly reduced from that of the F I. In total all of the modifications added some 550 lb (249 kg) to the weight of the aircraft. Maximum speed was decreased by 11 mph (18 km/h).
The Hornet NF 21 was designed to fill a need for a naval night fighter. Special flame dampening exhausts were installed, and a second basic cockpit was added to the rear fuselage, just above the wing trailing edges. ASH radar equipment was placed to the rear of this cockpit, with the radar operator/navigator seated facing aft. To gain access a small trap door was provided in the lower fuselage; a fixed, teardrop shaped bubble canopy, which could be jettisoned in an emergency, provided a good field of view. At the front of the aircraft the nose underwent a transformation with the small rotating ASH radar dish being housed under an elongated "thimble" radome. The horizontal tail units were increased in span. The effect of these modifications on performance was minimal; about 4 mph (6 km/h)
The Sea Hornet PR 22 was a dedicated photo reconnaissance aircraft version of the F.20. The cannon were removed and the apertures faired over. Three cameras were installed in the rear fuselage; two were F.52s for
diurnal use and one K.19B fornocturnal . A total of 23 of these were built, interspersed with F.20s being built atHatfield .The lone civilian Hornet was a Sea Hornet F.20 TT193. It had been sent to
Edmonton, Alberta , Canada for winter trials and was later sold rather than be transported back to England. Registered CF-GUO, it was operated bySpartan Air Services andField Aviation until June 11, 1952 when an engine failure caused a forced landing atTerrace, British Columbia . Some of the remains are still there in private hands.Flying the Sea Hornet
Captain
Eric "Winkle" Brown , former fighter pilot and officer of theFleet Air Arm , is one of the world's most accomplishedtest pilot s and he still holds the record for flying the greatest number of different aircraft types.Just after VE Day the first semi-navalised Sea Hornet "PX212" arrived at the RAE,
Farnborough . Eric Brown initiated "work-up-to deck landing" trials; 37 years later he was still impressed::"...the next two months of handling and deck landing assessment trials were to be absolute joy; from the outset the Sea Hornet was a winner!":"The view from the cockpit, positioned right forward in the nose beneath a one-piece aft-sliding canopy was truly magnificent. The Sea Hornet was easy to taxi, with powerful brakes... the takeoff using 25 lb (2,053mm Hg, 51"Hg) boost and flaps at one-third extension was remarkable! The convert|2070|hp|abbr=on Merlin 130/131 engines fitted to the prototypes were to be derated to 18 lb (1,691 Hg, 37"Hg) boost and convert|2030|hp|abbr=on as Merlin 133/134s in production Sea Hornets, but takeoff performance was to remain fantastic. Climb with convert|18|lb|abbr=on boost exceeded 4,000 ft/min (20.32 m/sec)"...:"In level flight the Sea Hornet's stability about all axes was just satisfactory, characteristic, of course, of a good day interceptor fighter. Its stalling characteristics were innocuous, with a fair amount of elevator buffeting and aileron twitching preceding the actual stall"...:"For aerobatics the Sea Hornet was absolute bliss. The excess of power was such that manoeuvres in the vertical plane can only be described as rocket like. Even with one propeller feathered the Hornet could loop with the best single-engine fighter, and its aerodynamic cleanliness was such that I delighted in its demonstration by diving with both engines at full bore and feathering "both" propellers before pulling up into a loop!Brown 1982] [Note: A photo of "PX212", with Captain Brown at the controls and both propellers feathered is shown at the start of this page.]
During this series of tests Captain Brown found that the ailerons were too heavy and ineffectual for deck landing and there were some problems with throttle movement, brakes and the rubber-in-compression undercarriage legs still fitted. De Havilland were quick to modify the aircraft. Eric Brown::"The landings aboard "Ocean" had been made without any crash barrier... Yet, in the case of the Sea Hornet, I had felt such absolute confidence that I was mentally relaxed... Indeed, there was something about the Sea Hornet that made me feel that I had total mastery of it; I revelled in its sleek form and the immense surge of power always to hand...":"Circumstances had conspired against the Sea Hornet in obtaining the recognition that it justly deserved as a truly outstanding warplane...in my book the Sea Hornet ranks second to none for harmony of control, performance characteristics and, perhaps most important, in inspiring confidence in its pilot. For sheer exhilarating flying enjoyment, no aircraft has ever made a deeper impression on me than did this outstanding filly from the de Havilland stable."
Operational history
Hornet
The Hornet prototype "RR915" first flew on 28 July 1944 with
Geoffrey de Havilland Jr. at the controls. [Bowman 1997, p. 52.] Powered by twin Merlin engines, it was the fastest piston-engined fighter in Royal Air Force service. The Hornet also has the distinction of being the fastest wooden aircraft ever built and the second fastest operational twinpropeller -driven aircraft — being slightly slower than the unconventional GermanDornier Do 335 of 1945.The prototype achieved 485 mph (780 km/h) in level flight, which came down to 472 mph (760 km/h) in production aircraft.
The Hornet entered service in 1946 with 64 Squadron based at RAF
Horsham St Faith . Next to convert to the Hornet was 19 Squadron at RAFWittering , followed by 41 Squadron and 65 Squadron, both based at RAFChurch Fenton . No. 65 Sqn was to participate in one of the first official overseas visits by an RAF unit when they visited Sweden in May 1948. Pilot conversion to the Hornet was provided by No. 226 Operational Conversion Unit (O.C.U.) which was based atRAF Molesworth . [Note: All these units had previously flown single engine fighters (19, 64 and 65 Sqns on Mustang Mark IIIs and IVs, 41 Sqn. on Spitfire XIVs).]During their relatively short operational service Hornets participated in several record attempts and air races; for example, on 15 September 1949
Flight Lieutenant H. Peebles flew from RAFBovingdon toGibraltar at an average speed of 357.565 mph (574.445 km/h), setting a new British point-to-point record, only to see it broken three days later whenGroup Captain A.P.C. Carver flew back to Bovingdon, averaging 435.871 mph (701.466 km/h).Operationally the Hornet F I (later F 1) was to last only a short time before being superseded by the F 3 version. The first Hornet F 3 was "PX366" which flew at the Farnborough Show in June 1946.
New units to convert to this mark were 33 Squadron, 45 Squadron (based at RAF
Tengah ,Singapore where, in early 1952, the unit converted to the Hornet from the unreliableBristol Brigand ) and 80 Squadron. Along with 64 Sqn these squadrons operated inMalaysia where they replaced Beaufighters and Spitfires operating againstCommunist guerrillas during theMalayan Emergency . Armed with rockets and/or 1,000 lb (454 kg) bombs Hornets, with their long range and good endurance, were able to spend up to two hours loitering over the target area. They also proved to be very reliable; 45 Sqn Hornets, based inSingapore achieved 4,500 operational sorties over five years.The last operational Hornet sortie was flown on 21 May 1955. [ [http://www.dehavillandmuseum.co.uk/hornet/hornet.html 50th Anniversary] ] All Hornets were withdrawn from operational service by mid-1956. No examples of the Hornet remain in existence today.ea Hornet
The Sea Hornet F 20 prototype, "PX212", which didn't have the wing-fold mechanism, first flew on 19 April 1945. "PX212" was later converted to the prototype NF Mk 21, first flying in this form on 9 July 1946.
The first and only unit fully equipped with Sea Hornet F.20s was 801 Squadron on 1 June 1947 at RNAS
Ford . After a move toArbroath they were embarked on HMS "Implacable". In 1951 another move was made to HMS "Indomitable" until, in June, the Sea Hornets were replaced by Hawker Sea Furies.Other Sea Hornets were attached to various Naval Squadrons, including three which were attached to 806 Squadron which, along with a Vampire and two Sea Furies was embarked on HMCS "Magnificent" for a tour of North America in 1948. The Sea Hornets gave several spectacular flying displays at the International Air Exposition in New York between 31 July and 8 August.
In January 1949 The Sea Hornet NF 21 equipped 809 Squadron at RNAS Culdrose: moves were made to HMS "Illustrious" and then, in May 1951 HMS "Vengeance". The unit was then briefly seconded to the RAF at
Coltishall before a posting to Hal FarMalta where it disbanded in 1954.One Sea Hornet F 20, "TT213", was acquired by the
RAAF from theMinistry of Supply in theUnited Kingdom . The aircraft was used by theAircraft Research and Development Unit (ARDU), atLaverton, Victoria ,Australia from 1948 to 1950. It was mainly used for evaluation and tropical trials.As with its land-based cousin, no examples of the Sea Hornet remain extant.
Variants
;Hornet F 1:Fighter version, 60 built. ;Hornet PR 2:Photo-reconnaissance version, 5 built.;Hornet F 3:Fighter version, 132 built. ;Hornet FR 4:Fighter-reconnaissance version, 12 built.;Sea Hornet F 20:A navalised version for service on British aircraft carriers, 79 built.;Sea Hornet NF 21:
Fleet Air Arm night fighter powered by Merlin 133/134 engines, 72 built.;Sea Hornet PR 22:Photo-reconnaissance version, 23 built.Operators
;AUS
*Royal Australian Air Force - One aircraft used for evaluation and tropical trials.;UK
*Royal Air Force
**No. 19 Squadron RAF
**No. 33 Squadron RAF
**No. 41 Squadron RAF
**No. 45 Squadron RAF
**No. 64 Squadron RAF
**No. 65 Squadron RAF
**No. 80 Squadron RAF *
Fleet Air Arm
**703 Naval Air Squadron
**728 Naval Air Squadron
**736 Naval Air Squadron
**738 Naval Air Squadron
**739 Naval Air Squadron
**759 Naval Air Squadron
**771 Naval Air Squadron
**778 Naval Air Squadron
**787 Naval Air Squadron
**792 naval Air Squadron
**801 Naval Air Squadron
**806 Naval Air Squadron
**809 Naval Air Squadron
**1833 Naval Air Squadron pecifications (Hornet F.3)
aircraft specifications
plane or copter?=plane
jet or prop?=prop
ref= [Bridgman 1946, p. 114.]
crew=1
capacity=
payload main=
payload alt=
length main= 36 ft 8 in
length alt=11.18 m
span main=45 ft
span alt=13.72 m
height main=14 ft 2 in
height alt=4.3 m
area main= 361 ft²
area alt= 33.54 m²
airfoil=
empty weight main=
empty weight alt=
loaded weight main= 19,550 lb
loaded weight alt= 8,886 kg
useful load main=
useful load alt=
max takeoff weight main= 20,900 lb
max takeoff weight alt= 9,480 kg [Note: Configured as a Long Range Fighter] Clark 1987]
more general=
engine (jet)=
type of jet=
number of jets=
thrust main=
thrust alt=
thrust original=
afterburning thrust main=
afterburning thrust alt=
engine (prop)=Rolls-Royce Merlin 130/131
type of prop=12-cylinder engines
number of props=Four blade, convert|12|ft|m|sing=on diameter "handed" de Havilland propellers: Two
power main= 2,080 hp
power alt=1,551 kW
power original=
max speed main= 472 mph at convert|22000|ft|m|abbr=on
max speed alt= 760 km/h at 6,706 m
cruise speed main=
cruise speed alt=
stall speed main=
stall speed alt=
never exceed speed main=
never exceed speed alt=
range main= 3,000 mi
range alt=4,828 km
ceiling main= 35,000 ft
ceiling alt= 10,668 m
climb rate main= 4,000 ft/min
climb rate alt= 20.3 m/s
loading main=
loading alt=
thrust/weight=
power/mass main=
power/mass alt=
more performance=
armament=*4x 20 mm Hispano Mk. V cannon (with 190 rounds per gun) in lower fuselage nose
*2x 1000 lb (454 kg) bombs under wing, outboard of engines
*8x "60 lb" (27 kg) RP-3 unguided rockets
avionics= ASH radar fitted in Sea Hornet NF Mk 21.ee also
aircontent
related=
*de Havilland Mosquito
similar aircraft=
*Grumman F7F Tigercat
*Lockheed P-38 Lightning
*Westland Welkin
*Westland Whirlwind (fighter)
lists=
see also=References
Notes
Bibliography
* Birtles, Philip J. "The De Havilland Hornet (Profile Publications No. 174)". Leatherhead, Surrey, UK: Profile Publications Ltd., 1967.
* Bowman, Martin W. "Sting of the Hornet." "Air Classics" Vol. 33, no. 6, June 1997.
* Bridgman, Leonard, ed. "The D.H. 103 Hornet" "Jane’s Fighting Aircraft of World War II". London: Studio, 1946. ISBN 1-85170-493-0.
* Brown, Eric (Captain, CBE DSC AFC RN). "Viewed from the Cockpit: Sea Hornet Supreme". "Air International" Vol 23, No 4, October 1982. pp 192-199.
* Buttler, Tony. "de Havilland Hornet and Sea Hornet (Warpaint Series no. 19)". Hall Park Books, 2000.
* Buttler, Tony. "de Havilland Hornet & Sea Hornet" "Aeroplane Monthly" Vol. 33, No. 6, June 2005.
* Caruana, Richard. "The De Havilland Hornet" "Scale Aviation Modeller International" October 2002, pp.943–951.
* Clark, J.H. "Forties Favorites 5 - de Havilland D.H 103". "Aeroplane Monthly" (Article first appeared in "The Aeroplane," 25 January 1946.) Vol. 15, No. 9, September 1987.
* Cooper, Lewis G. "The Hornet File". Tonbridge, Kent, UK: Air-Britain (Historians) Publications, 1992. ISBN 0-85130-202-5.
* Hall, Alan W. "Aircraft In Detail: de Havilland DH.103 Hornet". "Scale Aircraft Modelling" Vol. 12 No. 8, 8 May 1990.
* Jackson, A.J. "De Havilland Aircraft since 1909". London:Putnam, Third edition 1987. ISBN 0-85177-802-X.
* Mondey, David. "British Aircraft of World War II" (Hamlyn Concise Guide). London: Bounty Books, 1982. ISBN 0-753714-62-0.
* Wixey, Ken. "Ahhhh! Hornet!" "FlyPast" No. 156, July 1994.External links
* [http://www.dhhornet50.net The de Havilland Hornet Project" website]
* [http://www.vicflintham.co.uk/post-war-military-aircraft/hornet/hornet.html Hornet and Sea Hornet]
* [http://users.skynet.be/BAMRS/dh103/dh103.htm the de Havilland Hornet & Sea Hornet]
* [http://www.vectorsite.net/avmoss_3.html Hornet & Sea Hornet / Variant Summary]
* [http://www.dehavillandmuseum.co.uk/hornet/hornet.html Hornet 50th Anniversary Last Flight Celebration]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.