Bristle-spined Rat

Bristle-spined Rat Temporal range: none
Conservation status
Vulnerable (IUCN 3.1)[1]
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Mammalia
Order:	Rodentia
Suborder:	Hystricomorpha
Parvorder:	Caviomorpha
Family:	Erethizontidae
Subfamily:	Chaetomyinae Thomas, 1897
Genus:	Chaetomys Gray, 1843
Species:	C. subspinosus
Binomial name
Chaetomys subspinosus (Olfers, 1818)

The Bristle-spined Rat, Chaetomys subspinosus, is an arboreal rodent from Brazil. Also known as the Bristle-spined Porcupine or Thin-spined Porcupine, it is the only member of the genus Chaetomys and the subfamily Chaetomyinae. It was officially described in 1818, but rarely sighted since, until December 1986 when two specimens - one a pregnant female - were found in the vicinity of Valencia in Bahia State.^[2]

Characteristics

Bristle-spined Rats are named because the spines on the back are more bristle-like in texture than the spines on the rest of the body. They have long naked tails which are not prehensile. Adult animals weigh around 1.3 kg (2.9 lb).

Their skulls are unusual in several ways. The eye socket is almost completely surrounded by a ring of bone. Incisors are distinctly narrow. Overall, the animal displays a mix of New World porcupine cranial characters, spiny rat cranial characters, and characters that set it apart from all other rodents.

The Bristle-spined Rat is restricted to remnant forests and forest edges in the Atlantic coastal forests on the East Coast of Brazil. Its habitat is dwindling rapidly and the species may be vulnerable to extinction. It is classified as vulnerable by IUCN and endangered by USDI (Nowak, 1999

Taxonomic controversy

No consensus has been reached as to the taxonomic position of Chaetomys. It is commonly placed with the New World porcupines in the family Erethizontidae or with the spiny rats the family Echimyidae. Both are South American hystricognaths with hairs modified as spines or quills. Chaetomys has more highly developed spines than the spiny rats, but less developed than the porcupines. Characteristics of the premolar suggest that it belongs with the Echimyidae, but characteristics of the incisor enamel suggest that it belongs in the Erethizontidae. This animal is not endangered any more.

Patterson and Pascual (1968), Patterson and Wood (1982), Woods (1982, 1984, 1993) Patton and Reig (1989), Nowak (1999), and Carvalho (2000) support the inclusion of this animal in the Echimyidae whereas Martin (1994), McKenna and Bell (1997), Carvalho and Salles (2004), and Woods and Kilpatrick (2005) argue that it belongs in the Erethizontidae. Emmons (2005) mentions the family Chaetomyidae without much further comment except to exclude it from Echimyidae.

References

1. ^ Catzeflis, F., Patton, J., Percequillo, A., Bonvicino, C. & Weksler, M. (2008). Chaetomys subspinosus. In: IUCN 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 5 January 2009.
2. ^ Karl Shuker, Gerald Durrell, (1993). Lost Ark: New and Rediscovered Animals of the Twentieth Century. HarperCollins Publishers. pp. 89–90. ISBN 0-00-219943-2. 

• Carvalho, 2000. Substitution of the deciduous premolar in Chaetomys subspinosus (Olfers, 1818) (Hystricognathi, Rodentia) and its taxonomic implications. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 65:187-190.
• Carvalho, G. A. S. and L. O. Salles. 2004. Relationships among extant and fossil echimyids. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 142:445-477.
• Emmons, L.H. 2005. A Revision of the Genera of Arboreal Echimyidae (Rodentia: Echimyidae, Echimyinae), With Descriptions of Two New Genera. Pp. 247-310 in Lacey, E.A. & Myers, P. 2005. Mammalian Diversification: From Chromosomes to Phylogeography (A Celebration of the Career of James L. Patton). University of California Publications in Zoology.
• Martin, T. 1994. On the systematic position of Chaetomys subspinosus (Rodentia: Caviomorpha) based on evidence from the incisor enamel microstructure. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 2:117-131.
• McKenna, Malcolm C., and Bell, Susan K. 1997. Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York, 631 pp. ISBN 0-231-11013-8
• Nowak, R. M. 1999. Walker's Mammals of the World, Vol. 2. Johns Hopkins University Press, London.
• Patton, J. L. and O. A. Reig. 1989. Genetic differentiation among echimyid rodents, with emphasis on spiny rats, genus Proechimys. Pp. 75-96 in Neotropical Mammalogy (K. H. Redford and J. F. Eisenberg, eds.). Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville.
• Patterson, B. and R. Pascual. 1968. New echimyid rodents from the Oligoceneof Patagonia, and a synopsis of the family. Brevioria, 301:1-14.
• Patterson, B. and A. E. Wood. 1982. Rodents from the Deseadan Oligocene of Bolivia and the relationships of the Caviomorpha. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 149:371-543.
• Woods, C. A. 1982. The history and classification of the South American hystricognath rodents: Reflections on the far away and long ago. Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology Special Publication, 6:377-392.
• Woods, C. A. 1984. Hystricognath rodents. Pp. 389-446 in Anderson and Jones eds. Orders and families of Recent mammals of the world. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
• Woods, C. A. 1993. Hystricognathi. In Mammal Species of the World a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder eds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.
• Woods, C. A. and C. W. Kilpatrick. 2005. Hystricognathi. Pp 1538-1600 in Mammal Species of the World a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference 3rd ed. D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder eds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.

External links

• Animal Diversity Web page on Chaetomys